PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcmidmBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
 
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12: 52.
Published online Jun 8, 2012. doi:  10.1186/1472-6947-12-52
PMCID: PMC3408324
Is a prostate cancer screening anxiety measure invariant across two different samples of age-appropriate men?
Suzanne K Linder,corresponding author1,2 Paul R Swank,3 Sally W Vernon,2 Robert O Morgan,2 Patricia D Mullen,2 and Robert J Volk1
1Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
2School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
3School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Suzanne K Linder: SKLinder/at/mdanderson.org; Paul R Swank: Paul.R.Swank/at/uth.tmc.edu; Sally W Vernon: Sally.W.Vernon/at/uth.tmc.edu; Robert O Morgan: Robert.O.Morgan/at/uth.tmc.edu; Patricia D Mullen: Patricia.D.Mullen/at/uth.tmc.edu; Robert J Volk: BVolk/at/mdanderson.org
Received October 12, 2010; Accepted June 8, 2012.
Abstract
Background
In order to explore the influence of anxiety on decision–making processes, valid anxiety measures are needed. We evaluated a prostate cancer screening (PCS) anxiety scale that measures anxiety related to the prostate–specific antigen (PSA) test, the digital rectal examination (DRE), and the decision to undergo PCS (PCS-D) using two samples in different settings.
Methods
We assessed four psychometric properties of the scale using baseline data from a randomized, controlled decision aid trial (n = 301, private clinic; n = 149, public).
Results
The 3-factor measure had adequate internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the 3–factor model did not have adequate fit. When subscales were considered separately, only the 6–item PCS-D anxiety measure had adequate fit and was invariant across clinics.
Conclusions
Our results support the use of a 6–item PCS-D anxiety measure with age-appropriate men in public and private settings. The development of unique anxiety items relating to the PSA test and DRE is still needed.
Articles from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central