The average time until exhaustion was significantly extended in subjects who ingested HFM + M as compared with those who ingested HFM + P or HCM + P (p < 0.05) (). The time until exhaustion for subjects who ingested HFM + P showed no significant differences when compared with subjects who ingested HCM + P, but the performance time of seven out of eight subjects was extended.
Table 2
Runningtime to exhaustion for three trials. HFM: high-fat meal; HCM: high-carbohydrate meal; M: maltodextrin; and P: placebo jelly.
|
| HFM + M | HFM + P | HCM + P |
|---|
| A | 87 | 75 | 85 |
| B | 110 | 91 | 85 |
| C | 90 | 90 | 84 |
| D | 92 | 91 | 88 |
| E | 101 | 96 | 94 |
| F | 107 | 96 | 93 |
| G | 99 | 95 | 94 |
| H | 115 | 105 | 97 |
| Mean ± SE | 100 ± 3.4 *,† | 92 ± 2.8 | 90 ± 1.7 |
There was no statistical difference in the average values of oxygen consumption at rest (0.28 ± 0.01 L/min, 0.27 ± 0.01 L/min, 0.27 ± 0.01 L/min, in HFM + M, HFM + P, and HCM + P, respectively) or during exercise (2.59 ± 0.16 L/min, 2.59 ± 0.14 L/min, 2.58 ± 0.17 L/min, in HFM + M, HFM + P, and HCM + P, respectively) among the three groups. The RER, carbohydrate and fat oxidization rates are shown in , and . At rest, subjects in the HFM + M and HFM + P groups showed a lower RER and carbohydrate oxidation rate than subjects in the HCM + P group. During exercise, these values continued to decrease. In contrast, at rest, the fat oxidation rate was higher in the HFM + M and HFM + P groups as compared with subjects in the HCM + P group. During exercise, the fat oxidation rate was higher in the HFM + P group than the HCM + P group.
Carbohydrate oxidation () during rest was significantly lower with HFM + M and HFM + P than with HCM + P (p < 0.05), while fat oxidation for the same groups () was high (p < 0.05). Carbohydrate oxidation () during the 75 min of exercise was significantly lower in subjects in the HFM + P group as compared with those in the HFM + M and HCM + P groups (p < 0.05). Fat oxidation () during the 75 min of exercise was significantly higher in groups HFM+P and HFM + M as compared with the HCM + P group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, fat oxidation was higher in HFM + P as compared with HFM + M (p < 0.05). The total energy expenditure was not substantially different among the three trials.
Carbohydrate oxidation both during rest and exercise was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in subjects in the HFM + P group (887 ± 68 kcal) when compared with subjects in the HFM + M (969 ± 62 kcal) and HCM+P (1085 ± 60 kcal) groups. In addition, subjects in the HFM + M group showed a lower carbohydrate oxidation than those in the HCM + P group (p < 0.05).
The HR and RPE values during exercise increased as time passed, but no significant differences were found between the three groups.
No statistical differences were found between the three trials with respect to plasma glucose, serum insulin and LA concentration during rest (). However, the serum FFA concentration (d) during rest was significantly higher in subjects that had ingested a HFM + P as compared with those who had ingested a HCM + P (p < 0.05).
The plasma glucose concentration at 15 and 30 min of exercise (b) was significantly higher with the HFM + M diet than with the HFM + P diet (p < 0.05). However, regarding the serum insulin concentration during exercise (a), no differences were found between the three trials. Serum insulin concentrations during exercise were higher for HFM+M (14.9 ± 3.7 μU/mL) than for HFM + P (2.9 ± 0.5 μU/mL) and HCM + P (6.5 ± 3.0 μU/mL) at 30 min of exercise, but two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements did not demonstrate any significant difference. The serum FFA concentrations (d) during exercise were significantly higher with HFM + P than with HCM + P at 15 and 60 min of exercise (p < 0.05). The LA concentration (c) was not significantly different between the three trials during exercise, and the LA concentrations at exhaustion were 2.9 ± 0.3 mmol/L, 2.5 ± 0.2 mmol/L, 3.0 ± 0.2 mmol/L, for HFM + M, HFM + P, and HCM + P groups, respectively.