The goal of our study was not to offer a rationale for or to recommend the use of AA
in vivo. Rather since high-dose AA is already administered
in vivo, and both IFN-α and high-dose AA have similar success rates
in vivo
[8], our study was intended to perform the first comparative analysis of their
ex vivo and
in vitro molecular and cellular mechanisms of action. In this study, we reveal significant and superior antiproliferative, cell death-inducing and immunomodulatory effects of high-dose AA compared to IFN-α treatment, as demonstrated
ex vivo in primary HAM/TSP PBMCs.
In spite of the pronounced antiproliferative effects of high-dose AA in HAM/TSP PBMCs, treatment of NDs PBMCs also revealed antiproliferative effects of high-dose AA, unrelated to HTLV-1, indicating broad antiproliferative effects. Nevertheless, we observed preferential inhibition of virus-
versus TCR-induced lymphoproliferation in HAM/TSP, in keeping with its excellent safety profile and mild side effects
in vivo
[8]. A distinct pattern of Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines was observed for NDs and ACs in comparison with HAM/TSP patients, detected in cell-free supernatant of PBMCs. Whereas a minority of NDs and ACs secreted IL-6 only, the majority of HAM/TSP patients produced IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ pro-inflammatory cytokines. Although IFN-α exerted variable effects on pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, it non-significantly reduced IL-2 levels in HAM/TSP patients. However, IFN-α was unable to inhibit lymphoproliferation, in agreement with the previously reported modest role of IL-2 in spontaneous lymphoproliferation
[32]–
[34]. Furthermore, high-dose AA, but not IFN-α, significantly reduced IFN-γ and TNF-α levels of HAM/TSP PBMCs. Although the effects of IFN-α and high-dose AA on cytokine levels of HAM/TSP PBMCs were not significantly different, we suggest that high-dose AA has differential and superior immunomodulatory effects over IFN-α in HAM/TSP PBMCs, given the exacerbated
in vitro production of primarily IFN-γ and TNF-α by PBMCs from HAM/TSP patients and their high
in vivo levels in cerebrospinal fluid and spinal cord lesions of HAM/TSP patients
[22],
[35]–
[39]. Interestingly, the immunomodulatory effects upon cytokine levels, the induction of cell death or the antiproliferative response of either AA or IFN-α were not intercorrelated, supporting the differential pathways used by both drugs revealed by microarray data. In contrast, no significant effect of IFN-α nor high-dose AA was observed on HTLV-1 p19 levels in cell-free supernatant of HAM/TSP PBMCs, due to strong inter-patient variability. Of note, the antiproliferative or immunomodulatory effects of both drugs were also independent of the proviral load of HAM/TSP patients (p>0.3 for all comparisons). Given that certain HAM/TSP patients included in our study were already treated with high-dose AA combined with prednisone, we also recruited additional untreated Brazilian HAM/TSP patients, as well as Peruvian patients who were being treated symptomatically (baclofen) or had received antiretrovirals (AZT and 3TC). No correlation was observed between
ex vivo drug response and EDSS or disease duration. Therefore, the higher EDSS in some of our patients merely reflects more aggressive disease and rapid progression in Brazilian and Peruvian cohorts, as previously demonstrated
[40],
[41], as compared to for example the Japanese cohorts.
Due to the strong variability as well as cellular heterogeneity in HAM/TSP patient samples, we aimed to confirm our
ex vivo findings in HTLV-1-infected CD4+ T-cell lines
in vitro. In agreement with our HAM/TSP data, we were able to confirm the absence of antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory effects of IFN-α in HTLV-1-infected cell lines. In addition, we confirmed the previously described posttranscriptional inhibition of HTLV-1 p19 secretion by IFN-α
[24] in HTLV-1-infected cell lines, without any effect of IFN-α on cell death. Furthermore, we were able to confirm the antiproliferative, cell death-inducing and immunomodulatory effects of high-dose AA in both HTLV-1-infected cell lines, although MT-4 cells appear to be more sensitive to AA treatment than MT-2 cells. Whereas AA dose-dependently induced cell death in HTLV-1-infected cell lines, only high-dose AA exerted antiproliferative and immunomodulatory effects. We speculate that in analogy with the
in vivo situation in HAM/TSP patients, only high-dose AA is sufficient to induce significant effects. We hypothesize that the cell death-inducing and immunomodulatory effects of high-dose AA in HTLV-1-infected cell lines were most probably a direct consequence of programmed cell death, with morphological evidence of apoptosis. However, active-caspase 3 activation was not detected, suggesting that the effect of high-dose AA on DNA degradation and cell death might not be mediated by classical, caspase-dependent apoptosis. Confocal microscopy images confirmed extensive cell death with nuclear condensation in cell lines, but without massive accumulation of classical apoptotic bodies. In addition, IPA identified cell death-associated networks rather than classical caspase-dependent apoptosis, suggesting other types of cell death, such as necroptosis, caspase-independent apoptosis and/or mitotic catastrophe, should be considered as well. Although reactive oxygen species, as a major player in apoptotic cell death, are an obvious target of AA, genes or signaling pathways related to oxidative stress were not significantly up-regulated by AA treatment. In addition, treatment of HTLV-1-infected cell lines with
N-acetylcysteine showed no effect on cell death or proliferation, suggesting that the inhibitory effects of AA are unrelated to its antioxidant properties. Another possible explanation for the anti-HTLV-1 effect of AA, might be through the binding of its oxidized form, dehydroascorbic acid (DHA), to the ubiquitous HTLV-1 receptor GLUT-1
[42] and thereby blocking cell-to-cell viral spread or through interactions of DHA with cellular pathways involved in cell proliferation or survival, such as NF-κB. However, in contrast with AA, DHA did not induce cell death or DNA degradation at either low- or high-dose in HTLV-1-infected cell lines (data not shown). In addition, significantly high-dose AA-modulated carbohydrate metabolism and starch and sucrose metabolism canonical pathway, did not include GLUT-1 (or any related glucose-transporter). Therefore, pooled analysis by microarray and IPA indicate that the cell death-inducing effects of high-dose AA treatment in MT-2 cells, are likely mediated by genes such as ATF3, IKBKB, FOXF1, PTPN13, SERPINB2 or MIR155 (). Of those, IκB has been previously associated, whereas the others represent novel molecular targets in HAM/TSP. ATF3 has been shown to directly bind HBZ
[43], the HTLV-1 antisense transcript known to induce proliferation of HTLV-1-infected cells
[44],
[45] and to positively correlate with HAM/TSP disease severity
[46]. miR-155 is one of the few well-studied microRNAs that has been linked to immune system function and oncogenesis
[47]–
[49]. Through the promotion of the development of inflammatory T cells, including the IFN-γ-producing Th1, and the IL-17-producing Th17 cell subsets, and T cell-dependent tissue inflammation, miR-155 could be a key player in various autoimmune diseases
[50],
[51]. In both brain lesions as well as PBMCs of multiple sclerosis patients, miR-155 has been shown to be up-regulated
[52],
[53]. In addition, miR-155 has also been shown to function as a positive regulator of IFN-γ production in natural killer cells
[54]. In HTLV-1-transformed cells, miR-155 has been reported to be up-regulated when compared to HTLV-negative control cells
[55],
[56]. Given that HAM/TSP is characterized by a vigorous immune response to HTLV-1 with an exacerbated
in vivo production of IFN-γ, dysregulation of miR-155 could contribute to the development of HAM/TSP. Our results, revealing high-dose AA-induced down-regulation of miR-155 in MT-2 cells, suggest that this microRNA could represent a novel therapeutic target in HAM/TSP. In parallel, microarray and IPA analysis confirmed IFN-α-activated signaling pathways, resulting in the induction of several known antiviral genes such as OAS, Mx, IFI35 and IFITM1. Nevertheless, large clinical studies are necessary to elucidate the relevance of these IFN-α- and AA-regulated pathways in HAM/TSP
in vivo. Moreover, as IFN-α has a higher cost price and more severe side effects in comparison to high-dose AA treatment, the therapeutic potential of high-dose AA should be further explored, in parallel with widely used treatments such as corticosteroids and IFN-α, in future clinical studies with a biomarker discovery design. Considering the differential
ex vivo and
in vitro effects of AA and IFN-α, as demonstrated in this study, their modest
in vivo effectiveness might be increased if host or viral biomarkers are identified that reliably predict treatment outcome.
In conclusion, high-dose AA treatment has superior ex vivo and in vitro cell death-inducing, antiproliferative and immunomodulatory anti-HTLV-1 effects, as compared to IFN-α. However, differential pathway activation by both drugs opens up avenues for targeted treatment in specific patient subsets. Our findings reveal molecular mechanisms of action as well as candidate biomarkers for both IFN-α and high-dose ascorbic acid therapy and provide a rational basis for their use in HAM/TSP treatment.