PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of wtpaEurope PMCEurope PMC Funders GroupSubmit a Manuscript
 
Biochem Soc Trans. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 24, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3403808
UKMSID: UKMS49295
Myosin Motor Proteins are Involved in the Final Stages of the Secretory Pathways
Lisa M. Bond,§ Hemma Brandstaetter, James R. Sellers, John Kendrick-Jones, and Folma Buss
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK
§Laboratory of Molecular Physiology, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA
Please address all correspondence to: Folma Buss, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK., Tel. +44(0)1223 (office) 763348 (lab) 336782, Fax +44(0)1223 762640, fb1/at/mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
In eukaryotes, the final steps in both the regulated and constitutive secretory pathways can be divided into four distinct stages: 1) the ‘approach’ of secretory vesicles/granules to the plasma membrane; 2) the ‘docking’ of these vesicles/granules at the membrane itself; 3) the ‘priming’ of the secretory vesicles/granules for the fusion process; and finally 4) the ‘fusion’ of vesicular/granular membranes with the plasma membrane to permit content release from the cell. Recent work indicates that nonmuscle myosin II and the unconventional myosin motor proteins in classes 1c/1e, Va, and VI are specifically involved in these final stages of secretion. In this review, we examine the roles of these myosins in these stages of the secretory pathway and the implications of their roles for an enhanced understanding of secretion in general.
Keywords: Myosin, Exocytosis, Secretion, Actin, Fusion, Vesicle
Secretion/exocytosis is a fundamental mechanism for the extracellular release of proteins synthesized within the cell. It can be broadly divided into the two main categories: a) regulated secretion and b) constitutive secretion, which can be distinguished by differences in their temporal progression through a series of similar stages [1]. During constitutive secretion, proteins synthesized on the ribosomes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are transported in tubular/vesicular carriers from the ER to the Golgi complex, where they are processed and sorted for delivery to the plasma membrane (PM) for immediate release from the cell [2-4]. Proteins on the regulated secretory pathway pass through the same ER to Golgi to PM pathway route, but are then stored in either secretory granules or neuronal synaptic vesicles [5]. Rather than immediately releasing their cargo upon arrival at the plasma membrane, these carriers remain arrested near the PM until triggered to release their contents by a specific intracellular signal or ligand, such as a change in calcium ion concentration [6]. Thus by targeting certain proteins to the constantly active constitutive pathway versus the temporally regulated pathway, the eukaryotic cell can carefully control the rates and levels of secretion into the extracellular environment.
The final stages of the secretory pathway are a critical control point for regulating the release of secretory cargo at the plasma membrane. The vesicular or granular secretory carriers proximal to the plasma membrane in both the regulated and constitutive secretion pathways undergo four main phases: 1) approach, 2) docking, 3) priming, and 4) fusion [7, 8] (Figure 1). Remodeling of the cortical actin network plays a key role during these stages; for example, during regulated secretion in chromaffin cells the crosslinked actin filament network underneath the plasma membrane is reorganized and partially disassembled to allow secretory vesicles to be transported through this dense physical barrier. However, complete depolymerization of actin filaments inhibits secretion in many cell types, indicating that actin filaments also provide the tracks for transport of secretory carriers through the actin network to specific regions near the membrane (‘Approach’) [9]. The actin cytoskeleton may also provide the framework for the tethering or exact positioning of these carriers at the membrane before they dock to a specific complex of SNARE docking proteins (‘Docking’) [10]. The subsequent ‘priming’ of these carriers is a broad term encompassing the gathering of fusion machinery and the execution of any protein and lipid modifications necessary to prepare the carriers for the upcoming fusion event (‘Priming’) [11]. In the fourth and final stage, carrier membranes fuse with the plasma membrane to create aqueous channels called fusion pores that can open and close reversibly to permit release of the secretory cargo (‘Fusion’) [12].
Figure 1
Figure 1
Roles played by myosin motor proteins in the final stages of secretion
The precise mechanisms involved in secretory carrier transport and regulation during these four final stages of secretion are presently unclear. A plethora of studies, however, highlight the important roles of the cortical actin filament network and the myosin superfamily of molecular motor proteins, particularly the unconventional myosin proteins 1c, 1e, Va, and VI and the nonmuscle myosin II [13] (Figure 1). In this review we will examine what is known about the roles that each of these myosins play in the final stages of exocytosis and speculate how these roles may improve our understanding of these phases in the secretory pathway.
Myosin 1
Myosin 1e, a single-headed, long-tailed myosin motor protein, has been shown to play an important role in the final stages of regulated secretion during Xenopus laevis oocyte maturation [14]. In response to stimuli that trigger secretion, myosin 1e rapidly relocalizes from a cytosolic pool to the surface of cortical granules to facilitate their subsequent secretion. The localization and function of myosin 1e during cortical granule secretion is believed to be due to its interaction with cysteine string proteins (molecular chaperones), which are well-characterized constituents of granule membranes that play a crucial role in exocytic events. Since myosin 1e is recruited to these granules prior to the onset of secretion, it has been suggested that it functions in a pivotal step in the preexocytic ‘approach’ stage of granule transport. For example, myosin 1e could mediate the translocation of secretory granules through the dense actin filament network in the cell cortex to position these granules in close proximity to the plasma membrane, enabling the final phases of secretion to occur.
Another member of the class I family of myosins, myosin 1c, has been identified as a crucial motor in the insulin-stimulated secretion of GLUT4-glucose transporter-containing vesicles, enabling glucose to be taken up in adipose [15] and muscle tissue [16]. Myosin 1c is recruited to GLUT4-positive vesicles by its binding partner, the small GTPase RalA [15, 17]. In response to insulin, it actively drives these vesicles through the cortical actin network and anchors them to the actin cytoskeleton beneath the plasma membrane (‘approach’) [18]. Fusion of the GLUT4-vesicles with the plasma membrane requires phosphatidylinositol(PI)-3-kinase activity. Interestingly, a block in this fusion event caused by a PI-3-kinase inhibitor, can be overridden by overexpression of myosin 1c suggesting that myosin 1c may also have a role during fusion at the plasma membrane in this final step in the secretory pathway [18]. Since myosin 1c is known to drive localized remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton at the cell surface, it is possible that this motor creates fusion hot-spots that speed up GLUT4-vesicle secretion.
Myosin II
There is now extensive evidence that nonmuscle myosin II is implicated in the ‘approach’ and ‘fusion’ steps of the final stages in the secretory pathways. Interestingly it is the myosin IIA isoform that is involved in these events in the apical domain below the plasma membrane [27]. Numerous studies have shown that myosin II modulates the approach of secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane via regulation of the cortical actin filament network; for example, myosin II has been implicated in the regulation of actin filament distribution and reorganization during secretion in adrenal chromaffin cells [19, 20], in the assembly, stabilization, and remodeling of actin filaments in anterior pituitary lactotrophs [21], and in the regulation of cortical actin filaments in parietal cells [22]. In addition, myosin II plays a well-studied role in the ‘fusion’ stage of exocytosis; for example, myosin II has been shown to maintain an open fusion pore in secretory epithelial cells [23], to promote fusion pore expansion in chromaffin cells [24], and to regulate the duration of fusion pore opening in neuroendocrine PC12 cells [25]. It has been suggested that myosin II interacts with the cortical F-actin network to provide the tension necessary to expand the fusion pore for full secretory protein release [26] however so far there is no information on the ‘assembly state/organization’ of the myosin II that could generate this effect. There is a vast array of data on how force generation and filament assembly is regulated by nonmuscle myosin IIs in vitro, and thus it will be interesting in the future to determine how these regulatory properties of myosin II control specific steps in the secretory pathways in cells [27]. The combined roles of myosin II in both the ‘approach’ of secretory carriers to the plasma membrane and the actual ‘fusion’ of these carriers with the plasma membrane render this myosin a potentially critical contributor to the dynamics of the late secretory pathway.
Myosin Va
Myosin Va has been strongly linked to three of the four final stages of exocytosis: approach, docking, and priming. A protein well-known for its role in the ‘cooperative capture’ of pigment granules in the actin filament network in melanocytes [28], it has been suggested that myosin Va may play a similar role in the capture, tethering, and transport of secretory vesicles approaching the plasma membrane through the actin cytoskeleton [29]. In particular, myosin Va has been shown to transport secretory granules through the F-actin cortex in pancreatic β-cells [30, 31] and upon stimulation to transport insulin granules toward exocytic sites for the final stages of regulated secretion in INS-1E cells [32]. Furthermore, expression of a dominant negative form of myosin Va (missing the motor domain) causes a reduction or loss of secretory vesicle mobility in the cortical F-actin of PC12 cells [33, 34]. When a vesicle arrives at the plasma membrane, myosin Va plays a further role in mediating the docking of secretory carriers to the membrane itself [35]. As myosin Va has been shown to bind directly to the SNARE proteins syntaxin 1A [36] and VAMP2 [37, 38], this docking function may be based on myosin Va’s roles in the actual formation of SNARE docking complexes or in the binding of secretory carriers to preformed SNARE complexes. In addition to its roles in ‘approach’ and ‘docking,’ myosin Va has been suggested to play a role in the ‘priming’ of docked vesicles for later fusion [28, 32, 38]. The widespread functions of myosin Va throughout the ‘approach,’ ‘docking,’ and ‘priming’ stages of secretion render this protein an important focal point for examining the final stages of the secretory pathway.
Myosin VI
Although the retrograde motor myosin VI has been broadly implicated in the overall process of secretion [39-42], a role for this protein in the final stages of the exocytic pathway is only now emerging. Recent work highlights the interaction between myosin VI and its binding partner optineurin as a control point for regulating the dynamics of the fusion pore formed between the vesicular and plasma membranes in the fourth and final ‘fusion’ stage of the secretory pathway [43]. It has been suggested that the movement of secretory vesicle-bound myosin VI toward the minus ends of actin filaments might provide the tension/force necessary to stabilize or open the fusion pore during constitutive exocytosis [43]. A similar role for myosin VI in the final stages of regulated secretion is intimated by the recent discovery that myosin VI binds to the transmembrane protein otoferlin [44, 45], an exocytic calcium sensor that has been shown to directly regulate SNARE-mediated membrane fusion in auditory hair cells [44, 45]. Although the precise interaction between myosin VI and otoferlin needs to be established, it is possible that the functional interaction between these proteins occurs during the fusion stage of regulated synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Overall, these recent demonstrations that myosin VI is involved in the later stages of the secretory pathway highlights this protein as an interesting target for future studies.
Studying the dynamic events that occur in the final stages of the secretory pathway (approach, docking, priming, and fusion) reveals a critical involvement of the myosin motor proteins in these later stages of both regulated and constitutive secretion (Figure 1). Secretory vesicles or granules approaching the plasma membrane are transported by myosin Va, myosin 1e and myosin 1c along an F-actin filament path, probably as a multi-motor complex organized and regulated by myosin II. When the secretory vesicles/granules arrive at their precise location underneath the plasma membrane, they are tethered to the actin cytoskeleton and held in position by myosin 1c. They are then docked to the membrane by the direct interaction between myosin Va and the SNARE docking complex. Priming of these docked vesicles or granules for fusion relies on the membrane remodeling capabilities of myosin Va. Finally, fusion of primed secretory vesicles/granules is modulated by tension-based interactions of myosin VI, myosin II, and perhaps even myosin 1c with the F-actin cytoskeleton, which also regulate the dynamics (opening/closing) of the exocytic fusion pore.
The precise details of the involvement of each of these myosins in secretion at the molecular level however, still need to be elucidated. Which of the myosins act primarily as transporters, moving the secretory vesicles/granules to their correct locations in the cell, and which are mainly anchors, flexibly linking them to the dynamic actin (depolymerizing/repolymerizing) cytoskeleton? Could they work in both capacities depending on the identity of their adaptor/binding proteins? Which of their specific adaptor/binding proteins are involved in each precise step? Extensive further work will be required to identify and characterize the precise adaptor/binding protein for each of the myosins in different secretory cells. In addition, since it is likely that the myosins act cooperatively with over-lapping functions, it will be necessary to conduct future studies on the joint cellular functions of multiple motors, rather than examining each motor in isolation.
Further detailed studies on the roles of these myosins in secretion are particularly important due to the potential biomedical implications of their involvement in this process. It is possible that diseases linked to malfunctions in the final stages of secretion, such as Huntington’s disease [46] and Alzheimer’s disease [47], occur due to functional defects in the role of the myosins in these phases of the secretory pathways. Similarly, diseases arising from the improper function of myosins Ic/Ie/II/Va/VI, such as inclusion body myopathy [48], Griscelli syndrome [49], or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [50], could arise from an inability of these myosins to function properly in the secretory pathways. Future studies exploring the precise role of these myosins in secretion may therefore help us understand the pathogenesis of many modern diseases.
Acknowledgments
Funding
This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust (F.B., H.B.), a scholarship from the Winston Churchill Foundation of the United States (L.B.) and an NIH-Oxford-Cambridge PhD studentship (L.B.), and was supported by the Medical Research Council (J.K-J.). The CIMR is in receipt of a strategic award from the Wellcome Trust.
1. Kelly RB. Pathways of protein secretion in eukaryotes. Science. 1985;230:25–32. [PubMed]
2. Burgess TL, Kelly RB. Constitutive and regulated secretion of proteins. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1987;3:243–293. [PubMed]
3. Griffiths G, Simons K. The trans Golgi network: sorting at the exit site of the Golgi complex. Science. 1986;234:438–443. [PubMed]
4. Saraste J, Svensson K. Distribution of the intermediate elements operating in ER to Golgi transport. J Cell Sci. 1991;100(Pt 3):415–430. [PubMed]
5. Sollner TH. Regulated exocytosis and SNARE function (Review) Mol Membr Biol. 2003;20:209–220. [PubMed]
6. Lin RC, Scheller RH. Mechanisms of synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:19–49. [PubMed]
7. Jahn R, Sudhof TC. Membrane fusion and exocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:863–911. [PubMed]
8. Sorensen JB. Conflicting views on the membrane fusion machinery and the fusion pore. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009;25:513–537. [PubMed]
9. Aunis D. Exocytosis in chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla. Int Rev Cytol. 1998;181:213–320. [PubMed]
10. Pfeffer SR. Transport vesicle docking: SNAREs and associates. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:441–461. [PubMed]
11. Klenchin VA, Martin TF. Priming in exocytosis: attaining fusion-competence after vesicle docking. Biochimie. 2000;82:399–407. [PubMed]
12. Jackson MB, Chapman ER. Fusion pores and fusion machines in Ca2+-triggered exocytosis. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006;35:135–160. [PubMed]
13. Loubery S, Coudrier E. Myosins in the secretory pathway: tethers or transporters? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:2790–2800. [PubMed]
14. Schietroma C, Yu HY, Wagner MC, Umbach JA, Bement WM, Gundersen CB. A role for myosin 1e in cortical granule exocytosis in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:29504–29513. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Bose A, Guilherme A, Robida SI, Nicoloro SM, Zhou QL, Jiang ZY, Pomerleau DP, Czech MP. Glucose transporter recycling in response to insulin is facilitated by myosin Myo1c. Nature. 2002;420:821–824. [PubMed]
16. Toyoda T, An D, Witczak CA, Koh HJ, Hirshman MF, Fujii N, Goodyear LJ. Myo1c regulates glucose uptake in mouse skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:4133–4140. [PubMed]
17. Chen XW, Leto D, Chiang SH, Wang Q, Saltiel AR. Activation of RalA is required for insulin-stimulated Glut4 trafficking to the plasma membrane via the exocyst and the motor protein Myo1c. Dev Cell. 2007;13:391–404. [PubMed]
18. Bose A, Robida S, Furcinitti PS, Chawla A, Fogarty K, Corvera S, Czech MP. Unconventional myosin Myo1c promotes membrane fusion in a regulated exocytic pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:5447–5458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Doreian BW, Fulop TG, Meklemburg RL, Smith CB. Cortical F-actin, the exocytic mode, and neuropeptide release in mouse chromaffin cells is regulated by myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate and myosin II. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:3142–3154. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Giner D, Neco P, Frances Mdel M, Lopez I, Viniegra S, Gutierrez LM. Real-time dynamics of the F-actin cytoskeleton during secretion from chromaffin cells. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:2871–2880. [PubMed]
21. Vitale ML, Carbajal ME. Involvement of myosin II in dopamine-induced reorganization of the lactotroph cell’s actin cytoskeleton. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004;52:517–527. [PubMed]
22. Zhou R, Watson C, Fu C, Yao X, Forte JG. Myosin II is present in gastric parietal cells and required for lamellipodial dynamics associated with cell activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003;285:C662–673. [PubMed]
23. Bhat P, Thorn P. Myosin 2 maintains an open exocytic fusion pore in secretory epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:1795–1803. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Neco P, Fernandez-Peruchena C, Navas S, Gutierrez LM, de Toledo GA, Ales E. Myosin II contributes to fusion pore expansion during exocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:10949–10957. [PubMed]
25. Aoki R, Kitaguchi T, Oya M, Yanagihara Y, Sato M, Miyawaki A, Tsuboi T. Duration of fusion pore opening and the amount of hormone released are regulated by myosin II during kiss-and-run exocytosis. Biochem J. 2010;429:497–504. [PubMed]
26. Berberian K, Torres AJ, Fang Q, Kisler K, Lindau M. F-actin and myosin II accelerate catecholamine release from chromaffin granules. J Neurosci. 2009;29:863–870. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Conti MA, Adelstein RS. Nonmuscle myosin II moves in new directions. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:11–18. [PubMed]
28. Wu X, Bowers B, Rao K, Wei Q, Hammer JA., 3rd. Visualization of melanosome dynamics within wild-type and dilute melanocytes suggests a paradigm for myosin V function In vivo. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:1899–1918. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Rudolf R, Bittins CM, Gerdes HH. The role of myosin V in exocytosis and synaptic plasticity. J Neurochem. 2011;116:177–191. [PubMed]
30. Yoshizaki T, Imamura T, Babendure JL, Lu JC, Sonoda N, Olefsky JM. Myosin 5a is an insulin-stimulated Akt2 (protein kinase Bbeta) substrate modulating GLUT4 vesicle translocation. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:5172–5183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Varadi A, Tsuboi T, Rutter GA. Myosin Va transports dense core secretory vesicles in pancreatic MIN6 beta-cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:2670–2680. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Ivarsson R, Jing X, Waselle L, Regazzi R, Renstrom E. Myosin 5a controls insulin granule recruitment during late-phase secretion. Traffic. 2005;6:1027–1035. [PubMed]
33. Kogel T, Bittins CM, Rudolf R, Gerdes HH. Versatile roles for myosin Va in dense core vesicle biogenesis and function. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010;38:199–204. [PubMed]
34. Rudolf R, Kogel T, Kuznetsov SA, Salm T, Schlicker O, Hellwig A, Hammer JA, 3rd, Gerdes HH. Myosin Va facilitates the distribution of secretory granules in the F-actin rich cortex of PC12 cells. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1339–1348. [PubMed]
35. Desnos C, Huet S, Fanget I, Chapuis C, Bottiger C, Racine V, Sibarita JB, Henry JP, Darchen F. Myosin va mediates docking of secretory granules at the plasma membrane. J Neurosci. 2007;27:10636–10645. [PubMed]
36. Watanabe M, Nomura K, Ohyama A, Ishikawa R, Komiya Y, Hosaka K, Yamauchi E, Taniguchi H, Sasakawa N, Kumakura K, Ushiki T, Sato O, Ikebe M, Igarashi M. Myosin-Va regulates exocytosis through the submicromolar Ca2+-dependent binding of syntaxin-1A. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:4519–4530. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Prekeris R, Terrian DM. Brain myosin V is a synaptic vesicle-associated motor protein: evidence for a Ca2+-dependent interaction with the synaptobrevin-synaptophysin complex. J Cell Biol. 1997;137:1589–1601. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Ohyama A, Komiya Y, Igarashi M. Globular tail of myosin-V is bound to vamp/synaptobrevin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;280:988–991. [PubMed]
39. Chibalina MV, Roberts RC, Arden SD, Kendrick-Jones J, Buss F. Rab8-optineurin-myosin VI: analysis of interactions and functions in the secretory pathway. Methods Enzymol. 2008;438:11–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Sahlender DA, Roberts RC, Arden SD, Spudich G, Taylor MJ, Luzio JP, Kendrick-Jones J, Buss F. Optineurin links myosin VI to the Golgi complex and is involved in Golgi organization and exocytosis. J Cell Biol. 2005;169:285–295. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Au JS, Puri C, Ihrke G, Kendrick-Jones J, Buss F. Myosin VI is required for sorting of AP-1B-dependent cargo to the basolateral domain in polarized MDCK cells. J Cell Biol. 2007;177:103–114. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Yano H, Ninan I, Zhang H, Milner TA, Arancio O, Chao MV. BDNF-mediated neurotransmission relies upon a myosin VI motor complex. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1009–1018. [PubMed]
43. Bond LM, Peden AA, Kendrick-Jones J, Sellers JR, Buss F. Myosin VI and its binding partner optineurin are involved in secretory vesicle fusion at the plasma membrane. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:54–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Roux I, Hosie S, Johnson SL, Bahloul A, Cayet N, Nouaille S, Kros CJ, Petit C, Safieddine S. Myosin VI is required for the proper maturation and function of inner hair cell ribbon synapses. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:4615–4628. [PubMed]
45. Dulon D, Safieddine S, Jones SM, Petit C. Otoferlin is critical for a highly sensitive and linear calcium-dependent exocytosis at vestibular hair cell ribbon synapses. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10474–10487. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Morton AJ, Faull RL, Edwardson JM. Abnormalities in the synaptic vesicle fusion machinery in Huntington’s disease. Brain Res Bull. 2001;56:111–117. [PubMed]
47. Yao PJ, Zhu M, Pyun EI, Brooks AI, Therianos S, Meyers VE, Coleman PD. Defects in expression of genes related to synaptic vesicle trafficking in frontal cortex of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2003;12:97–109. [PubMed]
48. Amato AA, Barohn RJ. Inclusion body myositis: old and new concepts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:1186–1193. [PubMed]
49. Kumar M, Sackey K, Schmalstieg F, Trizna Z, Elghetany MT, Alter BP. Griscelli syndrome: rare neonatal syndrome of recurrent hemophagocytosis. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001;23:464–468. [PubMed]
50. Mohiddin SA, Ahmed ZM, Griffith AJ, Tripodi D, Friedman TB, Fananapazir L, Morell RJ. Novel association of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, sensorineural deafness, and a mutation in unconventional myosin VI (MYO6) J Med Genet. 2004;41:309–314. [PMC free article] [PubMed]