PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Invest New Drugs. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 1, 2013.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3402509
NIHMSID: NIHMS386902
Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of dasatinib and cetuximab in patients with advanced solid malignancies
Athanassios Argiris,1 Trevor M. Feinstein,1 Lin Wang,2 Tianbing Yang,3 Shruti Agrawal,4 Leonard J. Appleman,1 Ronald G. Stoller,1 Jennifer R. Grandis,3 and Ann Marie Egloff3
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
2Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
3Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
4Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York City, NY
Corresponding Author: Athanassios Argiris, MD, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, 5th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, Phone: 412-648 6575, Fax: 412-648-6579, argirisae/at/upmc.edu
Background
Combined inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Src family kinases (SFK) may lead to improved therapeutic effects. We evaluated the combination of dasatinib, an inhibitor of SFK and other kinases, and cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody.
Patients and Methods
Patients with advanced solid malignancies received cetuximab intravenously on a standard weekly schedule and dasatinib orally, once daily at 3 dose levels: (1) 100 mg, (2) 150 mg, (3) 200 mg. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of dasatinib were performed prior to starting cetuximab and following 14 days of treatment.
Results
Twenty-five patients (3 dose level 1; 19 dose level 2; 3 dose level 3) were initially treated. Three patients developed dose-limiting toxicities: 1 at dose level 2 (headache) and 2 at dose level 3 (headache, nausea). Grade 3–4 toxicities in more than 2 patients included: dyspnea (4), vomiting (4), nausea (3), hypersensitivity reactions (3), headache (3) and anemia (3). Twenty-one patients developed headache (8 grade 1; 10 grade 2), which occurred after the loading of cetuximab and lasted 1–3 days. Six additional patients were treated with dasatinib starting 3 days after the loading dose of cetuximab; none developed headache after dasatinib. Dasatinib pharmacokinetics and a transient decrease in SFK PY416 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were not altered by cetuximab. Patients with higher plasma TGF-alpha levels had worse progression-free survival.
Conclusions
Dasatinib 150 mg once daily plus weekly cetuximab is recommended for phase II studies. Early-onset headache was ameliorated by starting dasatinib after cetuximab.
Keywords: dasatinib, cetuximab, Src, epidermal growth factor receptor, phase I, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has emerged as a promising anticancer therapy target for a variety of solid tumors. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody recognizing the EGFR ligand-binding domain, received approval by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of colorectal and head and neck cancers. Cetuximab has shown modest single-agent activity in head and neck and colorectal cancers and is well tolerated with rash, infusion reactions and hypomagnesemia as its most notable toxicities (13).
Preclinical data indicate that Src family kinases (SFK) mediate EGFR-dependent and -independent signaling pathways important for tumor progression (47). Of the SFK, c-Src is most characterized and is overexpressed and/or activated in many epithelial cancers including lung and head and neck cancers (8). c-Src expression and activity increase at more advanced stages of tumor development and contribute to migration and invasion. Inhibition of SFK using pharmacologic inhibitors, siRNA or overexpression of a dominant-negative Src mutant was shown to inhibit EGFR transactivation and invasion (9). Importantly, combined SFK- and EGFR-targeted treatments was found to be more effective than either agent alone in reducing proliferation and invasion of SCCHN and survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in vitro (1011).
Dasatinib, an inhibitor of several kinases, including SFK, BCR-Abl, c-Kit and EPHA2 (1214), is approved for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Recent data suggest that a once-daily schedule is equally efficacious to the twice-daily schedule initially used for CML and associated with lower incidence of pleural effusions (15). Preclinical data demonstrate that dasatinib inhibits cell migration and invasion in SCCHN and lung cancer cell lines (16). Moreover, preclinical models selected for resistance to cetuximab have been reported to be re-sensitized to cetuximab following dasatinib treatment (17), suggesting that the addition of a SFK-targeting agent to cetuximab therapy may improve clinical response.
Patients
Patients were enrolled in this study from June 2007 through April 2009. Main eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years with advanced or refractory solid malignancies, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤ 2, adequate organ function, QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) ≤450 msec and no concomitant medications known to induce or inhibit CYP3A4. Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy (not involving EGFR or SFK inhibitors) was permitted. The study protocol was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00388427). All participants provided written informed consent.
Study treatment
Cetuximab [supplied by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Princeton, USA] was administered weekly on days 1, 8, 15 of a 21-day cycle. The first dose was 400 mg/m2 and all subsequent doses 250 mg/m2. Dasatinib (supplied by BMS) was administered orally at 3 dose levels: (1) 100 mg, (2) 150 mg, or (3) 200 mg once daily on a continuous dosing schedule until disease progression. On cycle 1, dasatinib was started one day prior to cetuximab (day 0). Patients did not receive premedication with corticosteroids with the infusion of cetuximab. In an attempt to ameliorate early onset headache observed frequently in the first 25 enrolled patients, an additional 6 patients were enrolled and treated on an altered schedule: dasatinib treatment beginning 3 days after the first cetuximab dose of cycle 1.
Evaluations
Pretreatment assessment included history, physical examination, laboratory studies, electrocardiogram and tumor imaging studies within 4 weeks of registration. During the first cycle patients were evaluated weekly.
Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined in the first cycle as grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity except the following grade 3 toxicities: nausea and vomiting, infusion reactions, rash and hypomagnesemia. Nausea or vomiting (≥ grade 3) lasting longer than 48 hours despite maximal medical therapy or a delay of more than 2 weeks in starting cycle 2 due to toxicity were considered DLTs. Patients with grade 3 or worse infusion reactions were removed from study. An abnormal non-hematological laboratory value (grade ≥ 3) was considered a DLT if clinically significant and drug-related. DLT hematological toxicities were defined as absolute neutrophil count < 1000/μL lasting longer than 7 days, grade 4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3 or 4 neutropenia associated with sepsis or fever. Reassessment imaging, including chest imaging, was performed every 2 cycles (6 weeks) and response assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (18)
Pharmacokinetic studies
Dasatinib pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were performed on day 0 and on day 15 of cycle 1 for the standard treatment schedule cohort (n=25). Blood for PK analysis was collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10 and 24 hours after dasatinib administration. On day 15 of the first cycle, cetuximab was administered 5–10 minutes following dasatinib dosing. Dasatinib in plasma was assayed at Bristol-Myers Squibb using liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-four samples were analyzed: 1 day 0 sample and 1 day 15 sample were inadequate for PK analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time of Cmax (Tmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-T)) and terminal half-life (T-HALF), which was calculated as Ln2/Lz (where Lz was the absolute value of the slope of the terminal log-linear phase). AUC(0-T) was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal algorithm in Kinetica. The lower limit of quantification for this assay was 1 ng/ml.
Pharmacodynamic studies
P-SFK peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) levels
Activated SFK, SFK PY-416 (P-SFK), was measured in PBMCs just prior to dasatinib dosing and 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours after dasatinib dosing on days 0 and 15 of cycle 1. Levels of P-SFK and c-Src were quantified in 50 μg of PBMC protein lysate by quantitative immunoblotting with Odyssey Infrared Imaging System and software (LI-COR Biosciences) following incubation with anti-SFK PY-416 antibody (Cell Signaling) or anti-c-Src antibody (Upstate) diluted 1:500 and subsequent incubation with secondary antibody linked to RDye 680CW (1:5000, LI-COR Biosciences).
Plasma analyte levels
Custom Searchlight (Thermo Scientific) multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to quantify EGFR, Transforming Growth Factor-alpha (TGF-α), amphiregulin (AR), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plasma levels in duplicate. A custom 2-plex assay for EGFR and HGF and custom 3-plex assay for TGF-α, AR and COX-2 were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Independent reanalysis was performed for randomly selected 5% of samples in order to assess assay reliability.
EGFR, P-SFK and c-Src levels in tumor tissues
Paired pre- and 3–5 week post-treatment tumor tissues were available for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for 4 patients. Tissues were incubated with anti-EGFR (E3138, 1:75000; Sigma Diagnostics), anti-c-Src (SC-18, 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or anti-P-SFK PY-416 (PK1109 1:50; Calbiochem) antibody with or without prior phosphastase treatment (P4978; Sigma) following antigen retrieval. EGFR staining was visualized using Mach 4 HRP-Polymer (M4U534H; Biocare Medical) and Dako Substrate Chromagen (K3468; Dako). P-SFK and c-Src were visualized using Dako Dual Envision (K4061; Dako) and Substrate Chromagen (K3468; Dako). Tumor staining intensity (integral scale from 0 to +3) and percentage (to the nearest 10%) were interpreted by a pathologist.
Statistical Methods
The study followed a “3+3” dose escalation design. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined, 12 additional patients were entered at the MTD to further study safety. Six additional patients were treated at the MTD with dasatinib starting 3 days after the loading dose of cetuximab.
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess ELISA reproducibility. Analyte correlations were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Changes in analyte levels from baseline to 14 days after treatment were evaluated using the signed-rank test. Analyte level differences in patients who achieved stable disease (SD) versus those with progressive disease (PD) were evaluated using the rank sum test. High versus low levels of plasma analytes, defined by the median, were tested for association with progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from first treatment on study to disease progression or death, using the log rank test. Plasma analytes whose levels were found to be significantly associated with PFS by the log rank test (P<0.05) were tested for association with PFS using univariate Cox proportional hazards models and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and PS.
A total of 31 patients were accrued (Table 1). Sixteen of the 25 patients treated on the original treatment schedule completed at least 1 cycle. Three patients did not complete the first cycle due to early disease progression and 6 patients because of toxicities, 5 of which occurred at the 150 mg daily dasatinib dose and were not considered dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) according to predefined criteria. These non-dose-limiting toxicities included 3 hypersensitivity reactions (2 grade 3 and 1 grade 4), 1 grade 2 headache and 1 grade 3 nausea.. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range: 1–15). Six patients had dasatinib dose reductions for treatment-related toxicities.
Table 1
Table 1
Patient characteristics
Toxicities
Among the 25 subjects treated on the original schedule, headache was the most common toxicity and was dose-limiting (Table 2). Typically, headache started the day of cetuximab loading and lasted 1–3 days (median 2 days). Headache was managed with analgesics, usually narcotics (e.g. oxycodone), and sumatriptan. Two patients required hospitalization for management of headache. Three patients developed DLT: 1 patient at a dasatinib dose of 150 mg/day developed grade 3 headache; 2 patients at 200 mg/day developed grade 3 headache and grade 3 nausea despite antiemetics. One patient developed a grade 4 anaphylatic reaction to dasatinib and another patient a grade 3 infusion reaction to cetuximab, which were not considered dose-limiting. Thus, the MTD was reached at 150 mg/day of dasatinib. Pleural effusion developed after 2–5 months of treatment in 4 patients (grade 2 in 3 patients; grade 3 in 1 patient). Serious adverse events, grade 3 or 4, reported in more than 2 patients included: dyspnea, vomiting, nausea, allergic reactions, headache and anemia (Table 3).
Table 2
Table 2
Patients with Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
Table 3
Table 3
Drug-Related Toxicities and Serious Adverse Events
Of the 6 patients treated on the altered schedule, 3 experienced headache prior to starting dasatinib (grade 2 in 2 patients; grade 1 in 1 patient) which resolved before starting dasatinib on day 4. Other serious adverse events included hypophosphatemia (n=2) and syncope with QTc prolongation (n=1) (Table 3). One patient suffered sudden death at the doctor’s office on cycle 1, day 21; no autopsy was performed, but the event was considered unlikely related to treatment.
Pharmacokinetics
The PK parameters (AUC and T-HALF) of dasatinib were comparable when given alone (day 0) or in combination with cetuximab (day 15) (Table 4). Dasatinib was rapidly absorbed with a Tmax of 1–2 hours. After the completion of the absorption phase, concentrations of dasatinib declined rapidly with a terminal phase half-life of 5–6 hours. Dasatinib Cmax and AUC parameters were similar for 100 mg and 150 mg dasatinib doses with and without cetuximab (Table 4).
Table 4
Table 4
Pharmacokinetics of dasatinib
Antitumor activity
In 23 patients evaluable for response, there were no objective responses; 10 patients with the following tumors had SD as best response: salivary gland cancer (n=3), follicular thyroid carcinoma (1), papillary thyroid carcinoma (1), adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (1), sarcoma (2), adenocarcinoma of unknown primary (1) and NSCLC (1). Median duration of SD was 4.3 months (range 2–22). Patients with previously untreated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary and papillary thyroid carcinoma both had SD lasting 22 months. Data regarding tumor progression prior to study enrollment were not collected.
Pharmacodynamics
P-SFK and c-Src levels in PBMC protein lysates were measured (Figure 1A). Compared to baseline levels, P-SFK levels on day 0 tended to be reduced by 4 hours following dasatinib dosing, were significantly reduced by 8 hours and did not differ from baseline levels at 24 hours (Figure 1B). At day 15, P-SFK levels were also significantly decreased by 8 hours from same day pre-dasatinib dosing levels (P=0.03), and P-SFK levels at 24 hours did not differ from pre-dasatinib dosing levels (P=0.18) (data not shown). Therefore, SFK were transiently inhibited in PBMCs following dasatinib dosing. The kinetics of inhibition were not appreciably altered with the co-administration of cetuximab. There was no association between antitumor activity and P-SFK levels.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
P-Src levels following dasatinib dosing were transiently decreased in PBMCs and varied in tumor tissues
P-SFK changes in tumor samples were heterogeneous. A NSCLC tumor had markedly reduced P-SFK levels post-treatment, while no appreciable changes in P-SFK levels was observed for the liposarcoma (Figure 1c) or parotid tumor (data not shown). The patient with liposarcoma had SD as best response while the other patients with paired tumor biopsies had PD as best response. c-Src was not altered with treatment (data not shown).
Plasma analytes
We measured plasma EGFR, TGF-α, AR, COX-2 and HGF levels in patients treated on the standard treatment schedule at baseline (n=25) and day 15 (n=16). COX-2 levels were generally below detection limit and were not further evaluated. ICCs for the remaining analytes were 93% to 98%, indicating the assay performed well (data not shown).
AR and TGF-α levels were significantly correlated at baseline and day 15 (ρ= 0.51, P=0.01 and ρ=0.60, P=0.02, respectively). No other analytes tested were correlated. EGFR levels were reduced (P =0.007) and AR and TGF-α levels were increased (P= 0.004 and P=0.007, respectively) after treatment; HGF levels were unaltered. Patients with PD had higher baseline TGF-α levels than patients with SD (P = 0.02). Patients with high baseline TGF-α levels had worse PFS (P= 0.036) (Figure 2A). This association was statistically significantly in univariate proportional hazards models (HR= 2.64; 95% CI= 1.03–6.78) but not after adjusting for patient age and performance status (HR=2.16; 95% CI = 0.80–5.82). No other analyte tested was associated with disease progression (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lower plasma TGF-α levels were associated with improved progression-free survival
Approaches to enhance the antitumor activity of EGFR inhibitors are under active clinical investigation. The combination of EGFR and SFK inhibitors is well supported by preclinical data (7, 910), prompting our phase I trial. We demonstrated that 150 mg daily dasatinib can be safely combined with cetuximab in patients with advanced solid malignancies and recommend 150 mg daily dasatinib in combination with cetuximab for a phase II trial in SCCHN. Initiating dasatinib after cetuximab is recommended to avoid early-onset severe headache. The mechanism of headache remains unclear; a PK interaction was not demonstrated. PK studies showed no evidence that cetuximab affects dasatinib PK parameters, and the parameters observed were within the range reported for other dasatinib clinical trials. Dasatinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, is currently under investigation in various solid malignancies. A recent phase II study of dasatinib monotherapy in NSCLC reported 43% of patients had either a partial response or SD (19). Low single agent activity was also reported in SCCHN (20), indicating it may be preferable to study dasatinib in combination regimens. The combination of erlotinib, an oral EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and dasatinib has been investigated in a phase I/II trial in NSCLC with similarly common GI, fatigue and skin rash toxicities but with only one patient reporting headache, which was grade 2(21). Two partial responses were observed in the NSCLC trial combining erlotinib with dasatinub. One of these occurred in a patient whose tumor harbored an EGFR activating mutation. EGFR activating mutations, which render NSCLC sensitive to erlotinib, have not been reported US SCCHN patients.
P-SFK levels were decreased in PBMCs following dasatinib administration when dasatinib was given alone or after the addition of cetuximab. This transient decrease of P-SFK levels in PBMCs observed in patients is similar to the transient reduction in P-SFK PBMC levels seen in the nude mouse prostate xenograft model (22). We observed no correlation between degree of inhibition of SFK phosphorylation in PBMCs and disease control. Changes in P-SFK levels in tumors with treatment were heterogenous. This may reflect transient inhibition of SFK as seen in PBMC and/or variable times from dasatinib dosing to tumor collection and fixation.
The changes in plasma EGFR, AR and TGF-α levels following combined cetuximab-dasatinib treatment likely reflect both physiological changes and the limitation of the ELISA assay. The accumulation of EGFR ligands following cetuximab administration in in vitro and in vivo cancer models was reported to result from ligand displacement and/or blocking of ligand binding sites by cetuximab(23). The observed decrease in EGFR plasma levels following treatment may reflect assay antibody specificity rather than physiological changes associated with treatment.
We are unable to distinguish the prognostic versus predictive value of baseline TGF-α plasma levels. However, baseline plasma TGF-α levels may be useful for defining patients more likely respond to this regimen. A planned phase II study in SCCHN patients combining dasatinib with cetuximab will assess the relationship between baseline TGF-α plasma levels and response.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding: Supported in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb, and the Head and Neck SPORE Grant No. P50 CA097190-06 from the National Cancer Institute
Role of funding sources
BMS provided drug and support for the study costs and pharmacokinetics; the Head and Neck Cancer SPORE provided support for the conduct of the correlative studies.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Argiris and Grand is have received research funding from BMS
1. Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, Koralewski P, Diaz-Rubio E, Rolland F, et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy [see comment] Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25(16):2171–7. [PubMed]
2. Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer PJ, Sr, Needle MN, Kopit J, Mayer RJ. Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor [see comment] Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22(7):1201–8. [PubMed]
3. Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au H-J, et al. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;357(20):2040–8. [PubMed]
4. Tice DA, Biscardi JS, Nickles AL, Parsons SJ. Mechanism of biological synergy between cellular Src and epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(4):1415–20. [PubMed]
5. Maa MC, Leu TH, McCarley DJ, Schatzman RC, Parsons SJ. Potentiation of epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated oncogenesis by c-Src: implications for the etiology of multiple human cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(15):6981–5. [PubMed]
6. Ishizawar R, Parsons SJ. c-Src and cooperating partners in human cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:209–214. [PubMed]
7. Egloff AM, Grandis JR. Improving Response Rates to EGFR-Targeted Therapies for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Candidate Predictive Biomarkers and Combination Treatment with Src Inhibitors. Journal of oncology. 2009;2009:896407. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Summy JM, Gallick GE. Src family kinases in tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22(4):337–58. [PubMed]
9. Zhang Q, Thomas SM, Xi S, Smithgall TE, Siegfried JM, Kamens J, et al. SRC family kinases mediate epidermal growth factor receptor ligand cleavage, proliferation, and invasion of head and neck cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(17):6166–73. [PubMed]
10. Koppikar P, Choi SH, Egloff AM, Cai Q, Suzuki S, Freilino M, et al. Combined inhibition of c-Src and epidermal growth factor receptor abrogates growth and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 2008;14(13):4284–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Leung EL-H, Tam IY-S, Tin VP-C, Chua DT-T, Sihoe AD-L, Cheng L-C, et al. SRC promotes survival and invasion of lung cancers with epidermal growth factor receptor abnormalities and is a potential candidate for molecular-targeted therapy. Molecular cancer research : MCR. 2009;7(6):923–32. [PubMed]
12. Lombardo LJ, Lee FY, Chen P, Norris D, Barrish JC, Behnia K, et al. Discovery of N-(2-chloro-6-methyl- phenyl)-2-(6-(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)- piperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4- ylamino)thiazole-5-carboxamide (BMS-354825), a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor with potent antitumor activity in preclinical assays. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2004;47(27):6658–61. [PubMed]
13. Wang XD, Reeves K, Luo FR, Xu LA, Lee F, Clark E, et al. Identification of candidate predictive and surrogate molecular markers for dasatinib in prostate cancer: rationale for patient selection and efficacy monitoring. Genome Biol. 2007;8(11):R255. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Li J, Rix U, Fang B, Bai Y, Edwards A, Colinge J, et al. A chemical and phosphoproteomic characterization of dasatinib action in lung cancer. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6(4):291–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Kantarjian H, Cortes J, Kim DW, Dorlhiac-Llacer P, Pasquini R, DiPersio J, et al. Phase 3 study of dasatinib 140 mg once daily versus 70 mg twice daily in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase resistant or intolerant to imatinib: 15-month median follow-up. Blood. 2009;113(25):6322–9. [PubMed]
16. Johnson FM, Saigal B, Talpaz M, Donato NJ. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) tyrosine kinase inhibitor suppresses invasion and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(19 Pt 1):6924–32. [PubMed]
17. Wheeler DL, Iida M, Kruser TJ, Nechrebecki MM, Dunn EF, Armstrong EA, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with Src family kinases in acquired resistance to cetuximab. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8(8) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–16. [PubMed]
19. Johnson FM, Bekele BN, Feng L, Wistuba I, Tang XM, Tran HT, et al. Phase II study of dasatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4609–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Brooks HD, Glisson B, Lu C, Sabichi A, Johnson F, Ginsberg L, et al. Phase II study of dasatinib in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15s):abstr 6022.
21. Haura EB, Tanvetyanon T, Chiappori A, Williams C, Simon G, Antonia S, et al. Phase I/II study of the Src inhibitor dasatinib in combination with erlotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(8):1387–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Luo FR, Barrett Y, Ji P, Holly P, McCann E, Rhyne P, et al. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) pharmacokinetics correlate with pSRC pharmacodynamics in phase I studies of patients with cancer: Results from CA180003. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. 2006 Jun 20;24(18S):3046 2006. Supplement.
23. Mutsaers AJ, Francia G, Man S, Lee CR, Ebos JM, Wu Y, et al. Dose-dependent increases in circulating TGF-alpha and other EGFR ligands act as pharmacodynamic markers for optimal biological dosing of cetuximab and are tumor independent. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(7):2397–405. [PubMed]