Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Addict Disord Their Treat. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 December 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Addict Disord Their Treat. 2011 December; 10(4): 180–187.
doi:  10.1097/ADT.0b013e31821cadbd
PMCID: PMC3401576

Cigarette Smoking and Neonatal Outcomes in Depressed and Non-Depressed Opioid-Dependent Agonist-Maintained Pregnant Patients



To investigate whether cigarette smoking and/or depression contribute to neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) severity.


Cohort study analyzing data from a randomized, controlled trial of methadone versus buprenorphine.


Seven study sites that randomized patients to study conditions and provided comprehensive addiction treatment to pregnant patients.


119 of 131 opioid-dependent pregnant patients who completed the MOTHER study.


Smoking data and depression status were obtained from the Addiction Severity Index and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, respectively. Neonatal outcomes (birth weight, preterm delivery and NAS pharmacologic treatment) were collected from the medical charts. Study site was a fixed-effect factor in all analyses.


Cigarette smoking was reported by 94% of participants and depression identified in 35%. Smoking was associated with low birth weight, preterm delivery, and NAS pharmacologic treatment in both depressed and non-depressed participants. The association between smoking and NAS treatment differed significantly between depressed and non-depressed participants. Among non-depressed participants, adjusting for site and illicit drug use, each additional average cigarette per day (CPD) increased the odds of NAS treatment by 12% [95%CI: (1.02-1.23), p=0.02]. Among depressed participants, each additional average CPD did not statistically increase the odds of NAS treatment [OR: 0.94, 95% CI: (0.84-1.04), p=0.23].


These results are consistent with the hypothesis that NAS expression is influenced by many factors. The relationship between CPD and NAS pharmacologic treatment is attenuated among depressed women in this study for reasons currently unknown. Further investigations are needed to clarify the complex relationships among maternal smoking, depression, and NAS.

Keywords: Cigarettes, depression, neonatal, pregnancy, opioids


In an effort to improve the maternal and infant health outcomes of opioid-dependent pregnant women, stabilization on therapeutic doses of methadone in the context of prenatal care and ancillary services has been the accepted standard of care (1). More recently, buprenorphine has been evaluated in randomized clinical trials for the treatment of opioid dependence during pregnancy (2-4).

Prenatal exposure to methadone, as well as other opioids including buprenorphine, often leads to neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in the newborn. NAS in prenatally opioid-exposed newborns is a constellation of signs and symptoms representing central nervous, autonomic, respiratory, and gastrointestinal dysregulation (5) such as hypertonicity, tachypnea, feeding problems, and irritability (6). Although nearly all opioid-exposed infants express some signs of NAS, the presentation varies widely and only a subset of these infants develop signs severe enough to require pharmacologic treatment (7). The reason for this variability in NAS expression is not well understood. Most studies suggest that the severity of NAS expression is unrelated to maternal methadone dose (7-11). Numerous other factors, such as placenta efflux transporters, antidepressant medication exposure and infant vagal tone, may modulate NAS expression exist and require further study (4,12-19).

Maternal cigarette smoking is one of the many variables postulated to affect NAS expression. There have been several reports that indicate an association between heavy maternal nicotine exposure and severity of NAS expression (4,14-18). However, because at least 90% of opioid-dependent pregnant patients smoke cigarettes (14,16,18,20-23), it has been challenging to disentangle this variable from the other potential risk factors for NAS severity.

Another variable frequently found in opioid-dependent pregnant smokers (24), which may also play a role in NAS expression, is maternal depression. Up to 50% of opioid-dependent pregnant women who smoke are also depressed (25), and depression is causally linked to numerous other adverse neonatal outcomes (26,27). However, the contribution of maternal depression in opioid-dependent women to NAS expression has not been previously examined. Nor have studies of maternal cigarette smoking and NAS concurrently examined the impact of the presence of co-occurring maternal depression on NAS.

In this study we aim to expand on the previous literature by examining whether maternal cigarette smoking and/or depression contribute significantly to the severity of NAS expression in the infant. This study will explore the possibility that maternal cigarette smoking and depression may have additive or synergistic effects on NAS severity in the infant.



This is a secondary analysis of data from the multi-site MOTHER study, which examined the comparative safety and efficacy of methadone and buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid-dependence among pregnant women and their neonates (28).


Participants in this cohort study were selected from 131 opioid-dependent agonist-maintained pregnant patients who completed a multi-site randomized controlled, double-blind, double-dummy intervention trial of methadone versus buprenorphine.

Eligibility and categorization of participants into groups

Of the 131 completers of the randomized controlled trial, 12 were excluded due to missing data on key variables: 7 lacked information on cigarette smoking, 3 lacked maternal urine toxicology screens within two weeks of delivery, and 2 lacked data on infant NAS treatment. 119 women had complete data for the outcomes and covariates of interest and so were eligible for inclusion in the subsequent cohort analyses. Both smokers (n = 112) and non-smokers (n=7) were included in the study cohort. Smoking status was identified based on self-report, and their cigarette smoking quantified using the Addiction Severity Index (29-31) at study entry and during study period. Both depressed participants (n = 42) and non-depressed (n=77) participants were included in the study cohort. Depression status was identified based on Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) (32) screening at study entry.


Addiction Severity Index (ASI)

All participants completed a modified ASI 5.0 (30), a semi-structured interview assessing lifetime (study entry only) and past month pre-treatment psychosocial functioning (study entry and monthly follow-up prior to delivery). For this study, number of cigarettes per day (CPD) smoked by the participant over study period was averaged and comparisons were made between average CPD and neonatal outcomes.

Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

All participants completed at study entry the MINI, a brief structured diagnostic psychiatric interview designed for multicenter clinical trials and epidemiology studies (32). Endorsement of one or both of two items (“Have you been consistently depressed or down, most of the day, nearly every day, for the past two weeks?”; “In the past two weeks, have you been less interested in most things or less able to enjoy the things you used to enjoy most of the time?”) has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid indicator of the presence of a current episode of major depressive disorder (MDD) (32). For this study, patients were categorized as depressed or non-depressed based on response to these two items on the MINI.

Neonatal medical documentation

Neonatal outcomes were collected from the medical charts and included birth weight, preterm delivery (<37 weeks) (yes v. no), and administration of NAS pharmacologic treatment (yes v. no).


Baseline demographics and rates of maternal cigarette smoking, substance use, and antidepressant treatment were tabulated. Rates of adverse neonatal outcomes (low birth rate, preterm delivery, and NAS pharmacologic treatment) were tabulated for the total sample, and separately, for depressed and non-depressed mothers. Univariate and bivariate logistic regression was used to assess potential risk factors (and their interactions) for NAS pharmacologic treatment. Linear combinations of parameter estimates were used to calculate the point estimates and confidence intervals for the increase in odds of NAS treatment associated with each additional cigarette, separately for depressed and non-depressed individuals. Site was a fixed-effect factor in all analyses: urban US (Baltimore, MD; Philadelphia, PA: Detroit MI: Providence, RI) v. rural US (Burlington, VT; Nashville, TN) v. urban European (Vienna), the latter of which was the control site for the parametric analyses. Pooling the sites minimized the possibility that site heterogeneity might adversely impact the analyses. Maternal illicit drug use is a well known risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes and so adjusting for maternal urine toxicology screens positive for illicit drugs minimized the possibility that this factor might adversely impact the analyses. All analyses were performed with the randomized controlled intervention trial blind intact.


Participant Characteristics: Study Entry

Maternal demographic, substance use, cigarette smoking, and depression data at study entry are presented in Table 1. All participants were opioid-dependent, but 29% and 13% at study entry were also using cocaine and marijuana, respectively. Over 90% reported smoking cigarettes and 35% of women screened positive for MDD.

Table 1
Participant demographic, depression and drug use characteristics at study entry

Participant Characteristics: During Treatment

Cigarette smoking, depression, antidepressant medication and illicit drug use during study period are found in Table 2. Most (94%) of participants reported smoking cigarettes, with an average number of cigarettes per day (CPD) of 11.3 (SD = 6.5). Twenty nine percent of participants used antidepressant medication. At least once during the study period, 25% of participants tested positive for illicit opioids, 17% for cocaine, 14% for cannabis, and 8% for sedatives. However, only 9% tested positive for any illicit drug within 2 weeks of delivery.

Table 2
Cigarette smoking, antidepressant medication use and drug use during study duration

Total Sample Neonatal Outcomes: Low Birth Weight and Preterm Delivery

Maternal cigarette smoking, adjusting for site and illicit drug use, was associated with lower birth weight [β:-20.49, 95% CI: (-35.42,-5.55), p<0.01] but not with lower gestational age at delivery [β:-0.03, 95% CI: (-0.09,0.03), p=0.33] among both depressed and non-depressed patients. The association between maternal smoking and low birth weight was attenuated, but still persisted after adjusting for estimated gestational age [β:-15.44, 95% CI: (-26.54,-4.35), p<0.01].

Total Sample Neonatal Outcomes: Administration of NAS Pharmacologic Treatment

A significant site effect was seen in administration of NAS pharmacologic treatment: neonates of both urban and rural US mothers were statistically significantly less likely to require NAS pharmacologic treatment as compared to infants of urban European mothers [urban US OR: 0.31, 95% CI: (0.12,0.79), p=0.01; rural US OR: 0.15, 95% CI: (0.05,0.43), p<0.01)].

Neonatal Outcomes by Maternal Depression and Smoking Status

Neonatal outcomes by maternal depression status are presented in Table 3. About half of the total sample’s offspring were administered NAS pharmacologic treatment. Table 4 contains results of the univariate analyses, which show that infants born to depressed women were significantly less likely to need NAS treatment. Although CPD was not associated with NAS treatment in the univariate analyses, because this variable has been implicated in NAS development and severity in past studies (4,14-18) it was included in the multivariate analyses, which are shown in Table 5. These analyses, as well as the linear combinations in Table 6, reveal that the association between smoking and administration of NAS pharmacologic treatment differed between depressed and non-depressed patients. Among non-depressed mothers, adjusting for site and illicit drug use, each additional average cigarette per day (CPD) increased the odds of administration of NAS pharmacologic treatment by 12% [95% CI :(1.02,1.23), p=0.02]. The odds ratio (OR) for the association between maternal depression and NAS pharmacologic treatment, adjusting for average CPD, site and illicit drug use, was 3.81 [95% CI: (0.66-21.92), p=0.13]. There was a statistically significant interaction between maternal depression and average CPD [ratio of ORs: 0.84, 95% CI: (0.72,0.97), p=0.02], such that among depressed mothers, adjusting for site and illicit drug use, each additional average CPD did not statistically increase the odds of NAS pharmacologic treatment [OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.84-1.04), p=0.23].

Table 3
Maternal depression and neonatal outcomes
Table 4
Univariate analyses of NAS pharmacologic treatment
Table 5
Multivariate analyses of NAS pharmacologic treatment, adjusted for site and drug use
Table 6
Linear combinations, adjusted for site and drug use

Additional analyses revealed no significant association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant treatment and NAS pharmacologic treatment, adjusting for CPD, illicit drug use, depression and cigarette smoking/ depression interaction [OR: 1.66, 95% CI: (0.64,4.29), p=0.30].

No significant association between maternal illicit drug use within two weeks of delivery and NAS pharmacologic treatment, adjusting for CPD, depression, and cigarette smoking/depression interaction, was found [OR: 0.63, 95% CI: (0.14, 2.79), p=0.54].


The finding that the average number of cigarettes per day smoked by a non-depressed opioid-agonist-maintained pregnant woman is a factor that predicts her offspring’s subsequent need for NAS pharmacologic treatment is not surprising. Although the finding that the same relationship is not true for the offspring of depressed women was unexpected, both are compatible with the well-recognized association of smoking with poor neonatal outcome (33) and the hypothesis that NAS expression is influenced by multiple factors (13,17,19). Alterations in maternal (34) and infant ((13) autonomic functioning have been found to be associated with NAS severity in opioid-exposed pregnancies, and the role of fetal programming has been implicated in underlying deficits present in alcohol exposed children (35,36). Epigenetic alterations and fetal programming have also been implicated in NAS expression (37,38). Further studies regarding the relationship between adult autonomic function and depression in both children and adults (39-42) suggest that depressed psychiatric patients have elevated levels of plasma catecholamines and other markers of altered autonomic function compared with non-depressed controls. The relationship between CPD and NAS pharmacologic treatment is attenuated among depressed women in this cohort of mother-infant dyads for reasons currently unknown. However, the suggestion that maternal depression results in altered maternal autonomic functioning and, through fetal programming, may affect the infant’s autonomic functioning, which may be expressed ex-utero as more severe NAS expression, warrants further study. Possible mechanisms for the attenuated relationship between smoking and NAS among depressed women in this study may include maternal smoking being a stronger determinant of adverse neonatal outcomes compared to maternal depression. Thus, maternal smoking may eclipse the effect of depression on NAS expression and antidepressant medication treatment, which may mitigate the effect of maternal smoking on NAS expression in infants born to opioid-dependent depressed mothers. These findings are provocative and clearly highlight the need for further research regarding the interaction of cigarette smoking, depression and NAS in opioid-dependent pregnant patients.

There are several limitations of this study. First, data were collected as part of a larger randomized controlled trial. As a result, this study was not optimally designed to examine the variables of maternal cigarette smoking and depression. Although, it used a broadly-defined self-report measure of both smoking and depression, a prospective trial on this topic could include more comprehensive and sensitive measures (e.g., biological measurement of smoking via carbon monoxide and/or cotinine; diagnosis of depression via clinical examination and/or lengthier structured clinical interview). The sample sizes of the examined groups are small and variable, which may limit the power and ability to detect all differences of interest. Ongoing measures of depression in the participants were not conducted limiting the interpretation of the role of antidepressant medication treatment in these women. Addressing these limitations would yield results supporting stronger conclusions. However, this study represents a first step in understanding the possible interaction between maternal cigarette smoking and depression in the expression of NAS.

The present study provides some of the first data examining the complex relationship among concomitant prenatal exposure to opioid-agonist medication, cigarette smoke, and maternal depression on NAS. While the health risks of maternal opioid medication treatment, cigarette smoking, and depression during pregnancy are independently well known for both mother and neonate, as a constellation these factors have received less attention. The present study is a first attempt at exploring some of these complex relationships. In addition, this study measured CPD as a continuous variable, in contrast to past studies of maternal cigarette smoking and NAS, which measured CPD as a dichotomous variable. Measurement of CPD as a continuous variable may improve the ability to detect maternal smoking effects on NAS expression.

Thus, future research must focus on several important issues. First, examining whether the type of opioid-agonist medication (i.e., methadone v. buprenorphine) to which the fetus is exposed alters the interaction among cigarette smoking, depression and NAS is indicated given previous differential findings between methadone and buprenorphine regarding the relationship between smoking and NAS (18). Second, characterizing how other combinations of the specific risk factors (i.e., type of opioid-agonist medication, presence or absence of cigarette smoking, cigarette smoking profiles, and/or depression during various stages of pregnancy) exacerbate or mitigate negative maternal and neonatal outcomes is needed. Third, how opioid-dependence, which is the focus of treatment, in combination with cigarette smoking and depression, fuels negative bio-behavioral outcomes in these women and their offspring is of interest. Fourth, identifying and implementing safe and effective treatments to reduce and eliminate smoking over the course of pregnancy to improve maternal and child health is imperative, especially in opioid-dependent patients who are at great risk for compromised maternal and neonatal outcomes.


Declaration of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest for this study, which was funded through NIDA R01DA 045778, 015832, 015764, 015738, 017513, 018410, and 018417.


1. Kaltenbach K, Berghella V, Finnegan L. Opioid dependence during pregnancy. Effects and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998 Mar;25(1):139–151. [PubMed]
2. Jones HE, Johnson RE, Jasinski DR, Milio L. Randomized controlled study transitioning opioid-dependent pregnant women from short-acting morphine to buprenorphine or methadone. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Apr 4;78(1):33–38. [PubMed]
3. Jones HE, Johnson RE, Jasinski DR, O’Grady KE, Chisholm CA, Choo RE, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent patients: effects on the neonatal abstinence syndrome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Jul;79(1):1–10. [PubMed]
4. Fischer G, Ortner R, Rohrmeister K, Jagsch R, Baewert A, Langer M, et al. Methadone versus buprenorphine in pregnant addicts: a double-blind, double-dummy comparison study. Addiction. 2006 Feb;101(2):275–281. [PubMed]
5. Osborn DA, Jeffery HE, Cole M. Opiate treatment for opiate withdrawal in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3) CD002059. [PubMed]
6. Finnegan LP. Treatment issues for opioid-dependent women during the perinatal period. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1991 Apr-Jun;23(2):191–201. [PubMed]
7. Jansson LM, Dipietro JA, Elko A, Velez M. Maternal vagal tone change in response to methadone is associated with neonatal abstinence syndrome severity in exposed neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Sep;20(9):677–685. [PubMed]
8. Cleary BJ, Donnelly J, Strawbridge J, Gallagher PJ, Fahey T, Clarke M, et al. Methadone dose and neonatal abstinence syndrome-systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2010 Sep 15; [PubMed]
9. McCarthy JJ, Leamon MH, Parr MS, Anania B. High-dose methadone maintenance in pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 1):606–610. [PubMed]
10. Berghella V, Lim PJ, Hill MK, Cherpes J, Chennat J, Kaltenbach K. Maternal methadone dose and neonatal withdrawal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):312–317. [PubMed]
11. Mack G, Thomas D, Giles W, Buchanan N. Methadone levels and neonatal withdrawal. J Paediatr Child Health. 1991 Apr;27(2):96–100. [PubMed]
12. Hemauer SJ, Patrikeeva SL, Nanovskaya TN, Hankins GD, Ahmed MS. Opiates inhibit paclitaxel uptake by P-glycoprotein in preparations of human placental inside-out vesicles. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009 Nov 1;78(9):1272–1278. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Jansson LM, Dipietro JA, Elko A, Velez M. Infant autonomic functioning and neonatal abstinence syndrome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 1;109(1-3):198–204. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Winklbaur B, Baewert A, Jagsch R, Rohrmeister K, Metz V, Aeschbach Jachmann C, et al. Association between prenatal tobacco exposure and outcome of neonates born to opioid-maintained mothers. Implications for treatment. Eur Addict Res. 2009;15(3):150–156. [PubMed]
15. Fischer G, Johnson RE, Eder H, Jagsch R, Peternell A, Weninger M, et al. Treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women with buprenorphine. Addiction. 2000 Feb;95(2):239–244. [PubMed]
16. Choo RE, Huestis MA, Schroeder JR, Shin AS, Jones HE. Neonatal abstinence syndrome in methadone-exposed infants is altered by level of prenatal tobacco exposure. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Sep 6;75(3):253–260. [PubMed]
17. Burns L, Mattick RP. Using population data to examine the prevalence and correlates of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Sep;26(5):487–492. [PubMed]
18. Bakstad B, Sarfi M, Welle-Strand GK, Ravndal E. Opioid maintenance treatment during pregnancy: occurrence and severity of neonatal abstinence syndrome. A national prospective study. Eur Addict Res. 2009;15(3):128–134. [PubMed]
19. Seligman NS, Salva N, Hayes EJ, Dysart KC, Pequignot EC, Baxter JK. Predicting length of treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome in methadone-exposed neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):396.e1–396.e7. [PubMed]
20. Chisolm MS, Brigham EP, Lookatch SJ, Tuten M, Strain EC, Jones HE. Cigarette smoking knowledge, attitudes, and practices of patients and staff at a perinatal substance abuse treatment center. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Oct;39(3):298–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Jones HE, Heil SH, O’Grady KE, Martin PR, Kaltenbach K, Coyle MG, et al. Smoking in pregnant women screened for an opioid agonist medication study compared to related pregnant and non-pregnant patient samples. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009;35(5):375–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Tuten M, Jones HE, Svikis DS. Comparing homeless and domiciled pregnant substance dependent women on psychosocial characteristics and treatment outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Jan 24;69(1):95–99. [PubMed]
23. Haug NA, Stitzer ML, Svikis DS. Smoking during pregnancy and intention to quit: a profile of methadone-maintained women. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 Nov;3(4):333–339. [PubMed]
24. Martin PR, Arria AM, Fischer G, Kaltenbach K, Heil SH, Stine SM, et al. Psychopharmacologic management of opioid-dependent women during pregnancy. Am J Addict. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):148–156. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Chisolm MS, Tuten M, Brigham EC, Strain EC, Jones HE. Relationship between cigarette use and mood/anxiety disorders among pregnant methadone-maintained patients. Am J Addict. 2009 Sep-Oct;18(5):422–429. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Henry AL, Beach AJ, Stowe ZN, Newport DJ. The fetus and maternal depression: implications for antenatal treatment guidelines. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;47(3):535–546. [PubMed]
27. Wisner KL, Sit DK, Hanusa BH, Moses-Kolko EL, Bogen DL, Hunker DF, et al. Major depression and antidepressant treatment: impact on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 May;166(5):557–566. [PubMed]
28. Jones HE, Martin PR, Heil SH, Kaltenbach K, Selby P, Coyle MG, et al. Treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women: Clinical and research issues. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Jan 11; [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, O’Brien CP. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980 Jan;168(1):26–33. [PubMed]
30. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, et al. The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992;9(3):199–213. [PubMed]
31. McLellan AT, Cacciola J, Alterman AI, Rikoon SH, Carise D. The Addiction Severity Index at 25: origins, contributions and transitions. American Journal of Addiction. 2006;15(2):113–124. [PubMed]
32. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 20):22–33. quiz 34-57. [PubMed]
33. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2001.
34. Jansson LM, Dipietro JA, Elko A, Velez M. Maternal vagal tone change in response to methadone is associated with neonatal abstinence syndrome severity in exposed neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Sep;20(9):677–685. [PubMed]
35. Zhang X, Sliwowska JH, Weinberg J. Prenatal alcohol exposure and fetal programming: effects on neuroendocrine and immune function. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2005 Jun;230(6):376–388. [PubMed]
36. Hellemans KG, Sliwowska JH, Verma P, Weinberg J. Prenatal alcohol exposure: fetal programming and later life vulnerability to stress, depression and anxiety disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 May;34(6):791–807. [PubMed]
37. Wei LN, Loh HH. Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Opioid Receptor Genes—Present and Future. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010 Jan 18; [PubMed]
38. Lester BM, Lagasse LL. Children of addicted women. J Addict Dis. 2010 Apr;29(2):259–276. [PubMed]
39. McGirr A, Diaconu G, Berlim MT, Pruessner JC, Sable R, Cabot S, et al. Dysregulation of the sympathetic nervous system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and executive function in individuals at risk for suicide. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2010 Sep 1; [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Tonhajzerova I, Ondrejka I, Javorka K, Turianikova Z, Farsky I, Javorka M. Cardiac autonomic regulation is impaired in girls with major depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010 May 30;34(4):613–618. [PubMed]
41. Udupa K, Sathyaprabha TN, Thirthalli J, Kishore KR, Lavekar GS, Raju TR, et al. Alteration of cardiac autonomic functions in patients with major depression: a study using heart rate variability measures. J Affect Disord. 2007 Jun;100(1-3):137–141. [PubMed]
42. Carney RM, Freedland KE, Veith RC. Depression, the autonomic nervous system, and coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 2005 May-Jun;67(Suppl 1):S29–33. [PubMed]