The mechanism mediating the interaction between NAFLD, NASH and HCC is not completely elucidated. Some of the hypothetical mechanisms are illustrated in . For HCC, the relationship with obesity seems to be primarily mediated by factors related to metabolic syndrome, NAFLD, and NASH. Insulin modulates intracellular signaling through the tyrosine kinase activity of the insulin receptor. Defects in these signaling pathways are thought to contribute to insulin resistance, which can then lead to hepatic fat accumulation by lipolysis.
14 Hepatic fat accumulation can then produce inflammatory changes in the liver.
14 In particular, free fatty acids may lead to hepatic inflammation through production of cytokines such as TNF-α. Mitochondrial dysfunction is also thought to lead to free radical production and oxidative stress, which may provide the “second hit” which allows progression from steatosis to steatohepatitis and cirrhosis.
14,70 Moreover, leptin levels have been demonstrated to be increased in patients with NASH,
71 pointing to a possible role for increased angiogenesis and vascular invasiveness in HCC in the setting of metabolic syndrome.
With respect to obesity as a risk factor for HCC, the exact relationship between HCC and risk is still being defined. Nair and colleagues used the United Network of Organ Sharing, a database on all liver transplantations performed in the United States, and showed that obesity was an independent predictor of HCC in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, and cryptogenic cirrhosis, but not for those with cirrhosis of other etiologies.
72A meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies conducted in Europe, the United States, and Asia showed that those who were overweight had a significantly increased relative risk of developing HCC (1.07 (95% CI=1.01-1.15), while for those who were obese, the relative risk was even higher at 1.85 (95% CI=1.44-2.37). This analysis excluded studies which included cirrhotics in order to avoid confounding by ascites.
73While earlier studies did not show a clear relationship between diabetes and HCC risk, more recent epidemiologic data suggest that diabetes is likely associated with a 2-4-fold increased risk of HCC.
74-76 It is not known whether insulin resistance causes NASH. Patients with cirrhosis of all types may become insulin resistant within the liver because insulin is not cleared properly.
77,78 However, peripheral insulin resistance is thought to be “primary,” leading to hepatic steatosis, which can then contribute to both peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance.
79 Steatosis, or fatty liver, can also be seen with hepatitis C infection, and those with both hepatitis C and fatty liver changes have a greater risk of HCC than those with hepatitis C alone.
80 Thus, mechanisms of carcinogenesis may relate at least partially to the intermediate steps of fatty change in the liver and insulin resistance rather than the “final outcome” of cirrhosis. Data are available which suggest that diabetes precedes liver disease and subsequently increases HCC risk.
76 Using data from a VA population, and excluding those with chronic liver disease at baseline. Dr. El-Serag showed that the incidence of HCC was doubled among patients with diabetes, and was higher among those with longer follow up. Similar findings were recently reported in a Japanese cohort study.
76, 81 These studies strongly suggest that the insulin resistance precedes the cirrhosis and HCC.
We performed a preliminary retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for HCC, and found a dose-response relationship between increasing BMI and the percentage of patients having microvascular invasion in their specimens,
82 supporting the idea that the obese milieu may contribute to angiogenesis. As noted above, those with other etiologies of fatty liver disease may also be at higher risk of cancer: a study of 99 patients undergoing liver transplantation with underlying hepatitis C showed that those with steatosis had a higher risk of having underlying HCC.
80Given the likely relationships between metabolic syndrome and HCC risk, several strategies have been attempted in the management of NASH. The most straightforward are interventions which lead to weight loss. Bariatric surgery has shown clear improvements in liver histology.
83 In children, a two-year lifestyle intervention including diet and 45 minutes per day of aerobic exercise improved metabolic parameters and liver histology.
84One pharmacologic intervention which has received attention as a potential treatment for NASH is pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione which improves insulin resistance and has anti-inflammatory effects in patients with type II diabetes. In a proof-of-concept study, 55 patients with impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes received either a hypocaloric diet plus pioglitazone (45 mg daily), or hypocaloric diet plus placebo. Patients assigned to the diet plus pioglitazone group showed improved glycemic control, but also showed reduced necroinflammation on pathology after 6 months of treatment.
85 Unfortunately, these results seem to reverse quickly when the medication is stopped, and weight gain is a major side effect of the drug.
86 Other insulin-sensitizing drugs, such as metformin, have been used, with improvements seen in metabolic parameters.
87Because oxidative stress is thought to mediate the progression of simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, antioxidants have also been tried in those with fatty liver disease. In the lifestyle intervention in children described above, the addition of alpha-tocepherol (600 IU/day) and ascorbic acid (500 mg/day) did not improve results compared with placebo (all children received the exercise and lifestyle intervention).
84 In adults, a randomized trial of 49 patients randomized to a combination of alpha-tocepherol and ascorbic acid or placebo led to improvements in fibrosis after 6 months in the treatment group, the placebo group unexpectedly did as well, making the interpretation of results unclear.
88,89A pilot study of pentoxifylline, a drug which inhibits TNF alpha, also led to improvements in biochemical markers, but the drug led to nausea in many subjects.
90Outcomes of those with metabolic syndrome and HCC are not well-studied. For instance, little is known about how those with underlying NASH respond to systemic treatments for their HCC. Leung and colleagues evaluated 149 patients treated with PIAF (cisplatin, interferon-alpha, doxorubicin and 5-Fluorouracil) and found that the presence of hepatitis C serology was an independent predictor of a worsened response rate. It is difficult to conclude that these results are definitive since only 4 patients were HCV positive. Further, since almost all the remaining patients had underlying HBV, the authors note that it is impossible to determine outcomes in those with other etiologies of liver disease. The presence of cirrhosis also led to worsened overall survival in patients treated with this regimen, similar to results seen in past trials with single agent doxorubicin, and data from the recently published Phase II trial of sorafenib in HCC.
92-94 Neither the SHARP trial nor the recently-published Asia-pacific trial of HCC using sorafenib comment on outcomes of those with non-viral disease.
95, 96 In the SHARP trial, those with vascular invasion showed a suggestion of a better response to sorafenib, although this was not statistically significant. Thus, data showing a higher degree of vascular invasion in tumors of those with NASH may have implications for response to anti-angiogenic agents like sorafenib.
Outcomes in obese patients with HCC after surgery may also be worse. One Japanese study showed no effect on overall survival or disease recurrence for initial resection, but a significantly worsened overall survival and disease recurrence in obese patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy.
97 Patients with hepatic steatosis may be at increased risk for tumor recurrence after resection.
98 Finally, diabetics also may have an increased risk of HCC recurrence. Patients who underwent resection for HCC with hepatitis C and were diabetic had significantly worsened survivals compared with those who were not diabetic. On multiple regression analysis, receiving insulin was an independent predictor of recurrence, underscoring the possibility that insulin may have carcinogenic properties in vivo.
99