PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Invest Dermatol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3396713
NIHMSID: NIHMS361098

Vitamin D receptor mediates DNA repair and is UV-inducible in intact epidermis but not cultured keratinocytes

To the Editor

While providing a powerful approach for studying epidermal biology, cultured keratinocytes may imperfectly model a three-dimensional epidermis in which cells are architecturally ordered. We report two important examples of the limitations of cultured keratinocytes in understanding vitamin D receptor (VDR) photobiology in murine skin. Recently, the vitamin D signaling pathway has been implicated in skin cancer prevention through its role in cellular responses to ultraviolet B radiation (UVB)-induced DNA damage, and demonstrations that VDR−/− mice are susceptible to UVB-induced epidermal tumors (Ellison et al., 2008; Mason et al., 2010; Quigley et al., 2009; Teichert et al., 2011). VDR's transactivation of certain genes is also mediated by a subunit of the nucleotide excision repair (NER)/transcription factor, TFIIH (Drané et al., 2004), further suggesting a potential interaction between VDR and DNA repair.

We examined the dependence of NER on VDR in detail in several model systems. First, wild-type and VDR−/− mice (Teichert et al., 2011) were irradiated with UVB, and removal of the most common UVB photoproduct, the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD), was monitored by immunofluorescence. 1 hour post-UVB, both wild-type and VDR−/− mice exhibited significant CPD levels in epidermal keratinocytes (Fig. 1a). In wild-type epidermis, CPDs were markedly diminished by 24 hours and undetectable by 48 hours post-UVB. In contrast, in VDR−/− epidermis, CPDs persisted at 24 hours, and were still clearly detectable at 48 hours, indicating impaired NER. CPD quantification indicated that even as early as 1 hour post-UV wild-type epidermis had fewer CPDs than VDR−/− epidermis (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1
VDR supports NER in intact epidermis but not cultured keratinocytes

To facilitate quantitative analysis, we also explored the role of VDR in DNA repair in vitro. Keratinocytes cultured from mice bearing floxed VDR and expressing cre recombinase did not significantly express VDR relative to control cells (Fig. 1c,d). UVB-irradiated cells were assayed for CPDs and the pyrimidine(6,4)pyrimidone photoproducts (6–4PPs) using a standard immunoblot assay (Yeh and Oh, 2002). In vitro, where it was possible to harvest cells within seconds following irradiation, no differences in initial CPD or 6–4PP levels were discernible between wild-type and VDR-negative keratinocytes (Fig. 1e), and both cell types were completely deficient in global genomic NER of CPDs over 48 hours, though equally proficient in repair of 6–4PP (Fig. 1f,g). These results agree with previous observations that cultured rodent cells possess poor global genomic NER of CPDs (Tang et al., 2000).

We then studied explanted epidermal sheets that better preserve skin architecture than do cultured cells while providing a more easily manipulable model system for quantitatively assessing VDR effects than whole animals. Following harvest (Teichert et al., 2011), explants from mice bearing floxed VDR and cre were irradiated through the stratum corneum and incubated for 46 hours before measurement of photoproducts by immunoblot assay. Floxed VDR explants expressing cre were significantly deficient in both CPD and 6–4PP repair (Fig. 1h,i). Hydroxyurea treatment did not significantly affect CPD levels at 46 hours, indicating that the observed CPD loss reflected true repair rather than dilution of DNA damage through replication, consistent with a lack of PCNA staining in explants (data not shown).

VDR has also been reported to be UVB inducible in vivo (Hong et al., 2008; Lesiak et al., 2011; Mallbris et al., 2005), while others have reported that VDR is down regulated by UVB in vitro (Courtois et al., 1998). We studied this difference in behavior in our mouse model systems. Irradiation of wild-type mice induced epidermal VDR mRNA levels 2–3.5-fold by 24 hours (Fig. 2a). In epidermal explants derived from wild-type mice, UVB induced VDR mRNA >6-fold by 24 hours, and sustained that level over 48 hours (Fig. 2b). As anticipated, VDR-negative explants exhibited undetectable VDR expression. These results indicate that UVB strongly induces VDR expression, consistent with in vivo mouse and human data. In contrast, cultured mouse keratinocytes only weakly induced VDR mRNA expression following UVB (Fig. 2c). Consistent with prior results from cultured human keratinocytes, VDR protein levels increased only slightly at low UVB doses and then actually appeared to decrease at moderate doses, though the observed differences at all UVB doses were not statistically significant (Fig. 2d).

Figure 2
UV induction of VDR in intact epidermis but not cultured keratinocytes

These results confirm that VDR is strongly induced by UVB in intact epidermis, consistent with its role in promoting NER (Ellison et al., 2008). These activities, however, are not reflected in cultured keratinocytes monolayers. Similarly, sonic hedgehog is expressed and repressed by vitamin D in epidermal explants but not in cultured keratinocytes (Teichert et al., 2011). Cultured rodent cells have been commonly regarded as being defective in CPD repair; this phenotype has been ascribed to rodent cells' inability to express DDB2 which encodes a DNA damage recognition protein (Hanawalt, 2001; Tan and Chu, 2002; Tang et al., 2000). However, qualitative studies of DNA repair in intact epidermis typically demonstrate that repair of epidermal CPDs appears to proceed efficiently (Fig. 1 and e.g., ref. (Mitchell et al., 1990)), suggesting that DDB2 expression is actually not limiting in intact mouse epidermis. It has also been reported that cultured mouse keratinocytes but not fibroblasts are actually repair proficient and express DDB2 (Pines et al., 2009). Interestingly, this prior study utilized keratinocytes grown on a layer of fibronectin and collagen, and it is possible that extracellular matrix or intercellular interactions or another as yet undefined tissue-related factor may specifically modulate NER activity in epidermal keratinocytes.

In summary, VDR is a UVB-inducible gene that critically supports NER activity in intact murine epidermis, but these activities are poorly recapitulated in keratinocytes cultured from the same animals. The use of epidermal explants may represent an approach that preserves the biological behavior of epidermis while providing a facile substrate for detailed molecular studies more commonly associated with cultured cells.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We thank S. Pennypacker for assistance in preparing keratinocytes. Work was supported by VA Merit Reviews (D.H.O., D.D.B.), NIH R01AR050023 (D.D.B.), and University of California Cancer Coordinating Committee grants (D.H.O., J.E.C.) and the Dickson Emeritus Professorship (J.E.C.).

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

  • Courtois SJ, Segaert S, Degreef H, Bouillon R, Garmyn M. Ultraviolet B suppresses vitamin D receptor gene expression in keratinocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;246:64–69. [PubMed]
  • Drané P, Compe E, Catez P, Chymkowitch P, Egly J-M. Selective regulation of vitamin D receptor-responsive genes by TFIIH. Mol Cell. 2004;16:187–197. [PubMed]
  • Ellison TI, Smith MK, Gilliam AC, MacDonald PN. Inactivation of the vitamin D receptor enhances susceptibility of murine skin to UV-induced tumorigenesis. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128:2508–2517. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hanawalt PC. Revisiting the rodent repairodox. Environ Molec Mutagenesis. 2001;38:89–96. [PubMed]
  • Hong SP, Kim MJ, Jung M-Y, Jeon H, Goo J, Ahn SK, et al. Biopositive effects of low-dose UVB on epidermis: Coordinate upregulation of antimicrobial peptides and permeability barrier reinforcement. J INvest Dermatol. 2008;128:2880–2887. [PubMed]
  • Lesiak A, Narbutt J, Wodz K, Pawliczak R, Rogows-kiTylman M, Sysa-Jedrzejowka A, et al. Repeated suberythemal UVB preexposure protects against high-dose UVB-induced expression of vitamin D receptor protein in human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131 [PubMed]
  • Mallbris L, Edström DW, Sundblad L, Granath F, Ståhle M. UVB upreglates the antimicrobial protein hCAP18 mRNA in human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125:1072–1074. [PubMed]
  • Mason RS, Sequeira VB, Dixon KM, Gordon-Thomson C, Pobre K, Dilley A, et al. Photoprotection by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and analogs: Further studies on mechanisms and implications for UV-damage. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;121 [PubMed]
  • Mitchell DL, Cleaver JE, Epstein JH. Repair of pyrimidine(6–4)pyrimidone photoproducts in mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1990;95:55–59. [PubMed]
  • Pines A, Backendorf C, Alekseev S, Jansen JG, de Gruijl FR, Vrieling H, et al. Differential activity of UV-DDB in mouse keratinocytes and fibroblasts: Impact on DNA repair and UV-induced skin cancer. DNA repair. 2009;8:151–161. [PubMed]
  • Quigley DA, To MD, Pérez-Losada J, Pelorosso FG, Mao J-H, Nagase H, et al. Genetic architecture of mouse skin inflammation and tumour susceptibility. Nature. 2009;458:505–508. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tan T, Chu G. p53 binds and activates the xerderma pigmentosum DDB2 gene in humans but not mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:3247–3254. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tang JY, Hwang BJ, Ford JM, Hanawalt PC, Chu G. Xeroderma pigmentosum p48 gene enhances global genomic repair and suppresses UV-induced mutagenesis. Mol Cell. 2000;5:737–744. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Teichert A, Elalieh H, Elias PM, Welsh J, Bikle D, D Overexpression of hedgehog signaling is associated with epidermal tumor formation in vitamin D receptor- null mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:2289–2297. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yeh K, Oh D. Efficient repair of UV-induced DNA damage in terminally differentiated keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;119:331.