|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging allows acquisition of diagnostic images in the shortest scan time, leading to better patient compliance and artifact-free images. Methods of clinical examination of the anterior chest wall joints vary between physician groups and consideration of the rules of rib motion is suggested. The type of joint and its synovial lining may also aid imaging/clinical correlation. This well-written study by experts in the field with a standardized design and methodology allows good scientific analysis and suggests the advantages of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in anterior chest wall imaging. Selection of clinical examination criteria and specific joints may have had an influence on the study results and the lack of association reported.
The Holy Grail of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the acquisition of diagnostic images in the shortest scan time, leading to better patient compliance and thereby to images without artifacts. The Holy Grail of a scientific study is a standardized design and a methodological approach. The recent study by Weber and colleagues is written by experts in the field who have utilized both these unwritten commandments . They have used a standardized design and methodology in their selection of whole-body MRI. This allows a good scientific analysis of the clinical parameters and imaging in the assessment of anterior chest wall findings in spondyloarthropathy (SpA).
It is arguable, however, that conventional MRI at higher fields, with cardiorespiratory gating, allows a more accurate assessment of joints by providing better spatial resolution than whole-body MRI, and the selection of this modality could have led to the inclusion of false positive lesions. The poor specificity and the cost-effectiveness of whole-body MRI has led to questioning its value as a screening investigation in the past , and this study may help rethink that approach .
The selection of an important yet traditionally ignored joint involved in SpA is also intriguing . The morphoanatomy of the costovertebral joint, its involvement in enthesitis and the importance of standardized MRI protocols have been previously stressed . It is not just the imaging of the anterior chest wall joints that needs standardization, but the methods used to clinically examine these joints by different physician groups. The clinical assessment using the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score protocol relies on palpation pressure . This protocol does not deal with the rules of rib motion. Ribs 1 to 5 exhibit primarily 'pump-handle motion', whereas ribs 6 to 10 exhibit 'bucket-handle motion'. Ribs 11 and 12, which do not articulate with the thoracic cage, undergo 'caliper motion'. The clinical examination of each set of ribs and differing motion requires varying assessment, as is performed by sports physicians . These variations may account for some of the results reported.
Furthermore, the reduction of the Mander Enthesis Index, with the selection of the first and seventh rib joints, in the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score may also account for the lack of association found . The first rib is a synchondrosis or a synostosis, with no movement at the anterior joint . To capture the relevant joints, along with varying types of motion, selection of the second and seventh anterior joints may have produced better correlation.
The type of joint and its synovial lining also influences variations in involvement and patterns of inflammation that are seen on imaging. The second costal cartilage and its articulation with the manubrium and the body of the sternum is unique in that it has an interarticular ligament and two synovial membranes. This arrangement is similar to the costovertebral joints that demonstrate a characteristic pattern of inflammation on MRI in SpA . The inflammatory patterns may therefore differ, allowing better specificity in SpA.
Whilst stimulating much thought, this well-written study by experts in the field, with its standardized design and methodology, allows a good scientific analysis of findings and suggests the advantages of a relatively new imaging variation. Whole-body MRI with its holistic screening approach may yet help redefine the SpA disease process. The selection of clinical criteria, how-ever, may have had an influence on the study results and the lack of association reported.
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; SpA: spondyloarthropathy.
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
See related research by Weber et al., http://arthritis-research.com/content/14/1/R3