Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2012; 7(6): e38996.
Published online 2012 June 29. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0038996
PMCID: PMC3387212

Inhibition of CK2α Down-Regulates Hedgehog/Gli Signaling Leading to a Reduction of a Stem-Like Side Population in Human Lung Cancer Cells

Alan P. Fields, Editor


Protein kinase CK2 is frequently elevated in a variety of human cancers. The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway has been implicated in stem cell maintenance, and its aberrant activation has been indicated in several types of cancer, including lung cancer. In this study, we show that CK2 is positively involved in Hh/Gli signaling in lung cancer cell lines A549 and H1299. First, we found a correlation between CK2α and Gli1 mRNA levels in 100 primary lung cancer tissues. Down-regulation of Gli1 expression and transcriptional activity were demonstrated after the silencing of CK2α in lung cancer cells. In addition, CK2α siRNA down-regulated the expression of Hh target genes. Furthermore, two small-molecule CK2α inhibitors led to a dose-dependent inhibition of Gli1 expression and transcriptional activity in lung cancer cells. Reversely, forced over-expression of CK2α resulted in an increase both in Gli1 expression and transcriptional activity in A549 cells. Finally, the inhibition of Hh/Gli by CK2α siRNA led to a reduction of a cancer stem cell-like side population that shows higher ABCG2 expression level. Thus, we report that the inhibition of CK2α down-regulates Hh/Gli signaling and subsequently reduces stem-like side population in human lung cancer cells.


Protein kinase CK2 (formerly known as casein kinase II) is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase that phosphorylates more than 300 proteins [1]. CK2 has a heterotetrameric structure consisting of two catalytic subunits (42-kDa α or 38-kDa α’) and the regulatory subunit (28-kDa β), forming the configurations α2β2, αα’β2 and α’2β2. CK2 is a multifunctional protein kinase [2], that has been shown to be involved in nearly every aspect of cell proliferation and survival [3], [4], [5]. The level of CK2α expression is tightly regulated in normal cells [6], and increased CK2α level and activity has been consistently observed in a variety of human cancers [7], [8], [9]. For instance, the high level and/or nuclear localization of CK2α is a marker of poor prognosis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, prostate cancer and gastric cancer [10], [11], [12], [13]. CK2 also affects several cell signaling pathways, including PI3K, NFkB and Wnt [6], [14], [15].

The Hedgehog (Hh) family of secreted proteins, which consists of Sonic, Indian and Desert Hedgehog, plays important roles in mammalian development and in stem cell maintenance [16], [17]. Activation of the Hh pathway is initiated at the cell surface by the Hh ligand binding to its receptor Patched (Ptc), resulting in derepression of the effector protein, a G-protein-coupled receptor, Smoothened (Smo) [18]. Ultimately, Smo activates the Gli family of transcription factors and target genes. There are three Gli proteins in humans: Gli1 serves to activate Hh target genes, Gli2 acts both as activator and repressor of Hh target genes, while Gli3 acts as a repressor of Hh target genes [19], [20]. Deregulation of Hh/Gli signaling is implicated as an initiating or maintaining factor in the progression of various cancers, including basal cell carcinomas, medulloblastomas, leukemia, lung, gastrointestinal, lung, ovarian, breast and prostate cancers [19], [21]. For instance, the Gli1 gene is amplified in human glioma and activated in basal cell carcinoma [22], [23], [24]. Transgenic over-expression of Gli1 in mice leads to the development of basal cell carcinoma [25]. Gli1 activation has been demonstrated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells and tissues [26].

Direct evidence that Hh/Gli signaling plays an important role in cancer stem cells (CSCs) derives from a series of studies in different tumor types [21]. Recent studies have indicated that ATP-binding cassette transporter member 2 of G family protein (ABCG2) is a direct transcriptional target of Hh/Gli signaling [27]. A subpopulation, named side population (SP) with higher ABCG2 expression level in human cancer cells including lung cancer A549 cells, showed series of CSCs’ characteristics [28], [29], [30]. Several lines of recent evidence suggest that hedgehog signaling regulates stem-like side population in human lung cancer cells. For instance, the side population of lung cancer cell line H460 preferentially expresses ABCG2 and SMO, a critical mediator of the hedgehog signaling. Cyclopamine, a natural hedgehog pathway inhibitor, greatly inhibits cell-cycle progression and cell proliferation of H460 cell line [30]. Cyclopamine also reduced side population in human cancer cells [31]. Furthermore, Hedgehog pathway inhibitor GDC-0449, a FDA approved drug for treatment of metastatic basal cell carcinoma, effectively reduced cell growth in human lung cancer cell lines. The effect is mediated by the inhibition of stem-like side population [32].

To date, there is no evidence for the relationship between CK2 and Hh/Gli signaling in mammalian cells. To investigate whether CK2 is involved in the Hh pathway in human lung cancer cells, we tested the activity of Gli1 after CK2 inhibition.


CK2α and Gli1 Genes are Activated and Correlated in Human NSCLC

Both CK2α and Gli1 genes have been shown to be over-expressed in a variety of cancers, including lung cancer [26], [33]. Through the use of semi-quantitative RT-PCR (Figure 1A) and Western blot analysis (Figure 1B), we examined the CK2α gene and protein in eight of NSCLC cell lines. Data showed that CK2α is expressed in all these cancer cells. Among them, at least five cell lines (A549, A427, H1299, H358 and H838) showed relatively higher expression of CK2α both at the mRNA and protein levels. CK2α expression was previously shown to be minimal in normal lung cells [34]. Gli1 gene and protein expressions were broadly detected in all cell lines except H358. Interestingly, there appeared to be a correlation between the expression of CK2α and Gli1 in these cell lines. We performed real-time RT-PCR of CK2α and Gli1 in 100 primary NSCLC samples. A mild correlation between CK2α and Gli1 mRNA levels was found in these tissues (r = 0.37, P<0.05) (Figure 1C). For subsequent experimental studies, A549 was chosen because the status of cancer-related pathways in A549 cells has been well characterized. H1299 was also chosen because of its relatively higher expression of CK2α and Gli1 genes.

Figure 1
Over-Expression and Correlation of CK2α and Gli1 Genes in NSCLC.

CK2α Knockdown Inhibits Hh/Gli Signaling Through Down-Regulating Gli1

To investigate whether CK2 suppression have an effect on the Hh pathway, we silenced CK2 expression using CK2 subunit-specific siRNAs. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the efficiency of RNA interference was monitored by semi-quantitative RT-PCR (Figure S1). The corresponding mRNA levels of the three subunits decreased, and the knockdown of α and α′ was confirmed by co-transfection of their siRNAs. The expression of the indicated Hh pathway components was also determined (Figure S2). Overall, the RT-PCR results showed that Ptc1 and Gli1 mRNA levels in A549 and H1299 cells were consistently down-regulated after CK2α or CK2β knockdown, whereas minimal changes were observed in other Hh pathway components. By real-time RT-PCR, we confirmed that the silencing of CK2α significantly inhibited Gli1 expression both in A549 and H1299 cell lines (Figure 2A). Silencing of CK2β also resulted in a significant decrease of Gli1 in both cell lines (Figure 2A). In addition, Gli1 expression was minimal in the normal lung control. At the protein level, silencing of CK2α led to a 71% (A549) and a 73% (H1299) decrease of Gli1, while silencing of CK2β led to a 67% (A549) and a 35% (H1299) decrease of Gli1. Treatment with CK2α′-targeting siRNA produced no obvious difference, rather than decrease of Gli1 in A549, and produced a 60% increase in H1299, both at the mRNA and protein levels (Figure 2B). Furthermore, we performed immunofluorescence staining with a monoclonal anti-Gli1 antibody, since nuclear localization of Gli1 reflects activity of the Hh pathway [35]. Nuclear Gli1 proteins were dramatically decreased in the presence of CK2α siRNA (Figure 2C). Moreover, silencing of CK2α resulted in a significant decrease (45% at 25 µM and 60% at 50 µM, P<0.01) in the Gli1-boosted Gli reporter activity, compared with the non-targeting siRNA (control) (Figure 2D).

Figure 2
CK2α Inhibition Down-Regulates Gli1 Expression and Transcriptional Activity.

Small-Molecule CK2α Inhibitors Down-Regulate Gli1 Expression and Transcriptional Activity

To further validate the role played by CK2α in the Hh pathway, we used two small-molecule CK2α inhibitors: TBB (4,5,6,7-tetrabromobenzotriazole), a well-known inhibitor of CK2α [36], and CX-4945 (5-(3-chlorophenylamino)benzo[c] [2], [6]naphthyridine-8-carboxylic acid), a first-in-class, selective, oral inhibitor of CK2α under investigation in Phase 1 clinical trials [37].

Cells were treated with various concentrations of TBB (10, 30, 50 µM) or CX-4945 (1, 3, 10 µM), or with the vehicle DMSO for 48 hours. Treatments with TBB or CX-4945 led to a dose-dependent decrease of Gli1 mRNA and protein levels both in A549 and H1299 cell lines (Figure 2E, 2F and S3). The quantitative mRNA levels were detected by real-time RT-PCR. As shown in Figure 2E, Gli1 expression in A549 decreased noticeably at the dosage levels of 1 µM CX-4945 and 10 µM TBB, and decreased significantly at 10 µM CX-4945 and 50 µM TBB (50% and 60%, P<0.05). At the protein level, these decreases reached to 76% (10 µM CX-4945) and 89% (50 µM TBB) in A549, and 81% (10 µM CX-4945) and 93% (50 µM TBB) in H1299, respectively (Figure 2F). Immunofluorescence staining with a monoclonal anti-Gli1 antibody on cultured cells showed a dramatically lower green florescence in the presence of 30 µM TBB (Figure 2G). We then demonstrated that the small molecules inhibited Gli reporter activity in A549 cell line, where a significant decrease (55%, P<0.01) was detected in the presence of 10 µM CX-4945 or 10 µM TBB (Figure 2H). These results are consistent with what we found in siRNA studies.

Forced Over-Expression of the CK2α Gene Leads to Gli1 Up-Regulation and Transcriptional Activation

To confirm whether the CK2 gene positively affects the transcriptional activity of Gli1, we transfected A549 cells with either a pcDNA3.1-CK2α or control pcDNA3.1-LacZ plasmid. As expected, the over-expression of CK2α was attributed to the activation of Gli1 in the A549 cell line. The over-expression of CK2α was detected by RT-PCR (Figure 3A) and Western blot (Figure 3B). The elevated Gli1 mRNA level was also detected by RT-PCR (Figure 3A). By Western blot analysis, we showed the elevated Gli1 protein level (2.35 folds) in cells with ectopic over-expression of CK2α (Figure 3B). Moreover, the reporter assay also showed a significant (>2 folds, P<0.01) increase of Gli1 transcriptional activity (Figure 3C). These findings suggest that the over-expression of CK2α gene leads to an up-regulation of Gli1 gene expression and transcriptional activity.

Figure 3
Over-Expression of CK2α Gene Leads to Gli1 Up-Regulation and Transcriptional Activation, and Loss of CK2α Function Promotes Gli1 Degradation.

The Silencing of CK2α Promotes Gli1 Degradation

We further carried out a time-course experiment to examine Gli1 half-time. A549 cells were transfected with CK2α or control siRNA, and Gli1 protein levels were detected at the time points of 0, 1 and 2 hours after treatment with the protein inhibitor, cycloheximide. In the CK2α knockdown group, the Gli1 protein level reduced to mimimum at 2 hours after treatment with cycloheximide (when compared with that at 0 hour), which suggested that the half life of Gli1 after CK2α siRNA knockdown is <2 hours. These data indicate that CK2α knockdown results in degradation of Gli1 (Figure 3D). This, in turn, suggests that CK2α regulates Gli1 activity by preventing its degradation.

CK2α Knockdown Down-Regulates Hh Downstream Genes and Reduces SP Profile via ABCG2 in A549

Hh reportedly controls the proliferation of several cell types through various molecular mechanisms and targets downstream genes, including Ptc, Cyclin family members, and self-induction of Gli1 [20], [38]. We analyzed mRNA levels of four (Gli1, Ptc1, Ptc2 and Cyclin E1) of these genes by using real-time RT-PCR (Figure 4A). The expression of the four Hh target genes decreased significantly (P<0.05) after CK2α knockdown, which suggests a depressed transcriptional activity of the Hh pathway.

Figure 4
CK2α Knockdown Down-Regulates Hh Signal Pathway Transduction and Reduces SP Proportion in A549.

It has been demonstrated that ABCG2 is the primary contributor to the SP phenotype in several cancer cell lines including A549 [28]. The SP phenotype has been characterized in a series of studies of cancer stem cells derived from prostate, breast, colon, glioma, bladder, ovary, cervix, and melanoma [29], [39], [40], [41], [42]. Recent studies show that ABCG2 is a direct target of the Hh pathway which is involved in stem cell maintenance [27]. We first examined ABCG2 expression after CK2α knockdown and found that the ABCG2 level decreased dramatically in CK2α-silenced A549 cells (Figure 4B). Consistent with other findings, relatively higher percentage (26.8%) of A549 cells were classified as SP cells in our study. In the presence of verapamil, an ABC transporter inhibitor, the proportion of SP cells dropped to 9.4%. After treatment with CK2α siRNA, the proportion dropped to 15.4% (without verapamil) or 3.4% (with verapamil) (Figure 4C and 4D). We then sorted SP and non-SP cells in this system. In further analysis by semi-quantitative RT-PCR, the sorted SP cells showed higher expression of ABCG2 than did non-SP cells, but no difference of ABCG2 expression in SP or non-SP cells was shown between the CK2α siRNA and control (Figure S4). In brief, we showed a 42.5% reduction of SP proportion after CK2α knockdown.


Our results suggest that CK2 is a positive regulator in Hh/Gli1 signaling in human lung cancer. This is supported by several lines of evidence. First of all, the correlation of CK2 and Gli1 expressions were noticed in several lung cancer cell lines. We further demonstrated a linear correlation in 100 primary NSCLC tissues. Secondly, the inhibition of CK2α by siRNA or small-molecular inhibitors resulted in down-regulation of Gli1 expression and transcriptional activity. Thirdly, forced over-expression of CK2α resulted in increased Gli1 expression and transcriptional activity. Finally, CK2α knockdown led to a reduction of side population via down-regulating ABCG2, a direct target of Hh/Gli signaling [27].

To date, there is no evidence for the correlation between CK2 and Hh/Gli signaling in human cancer cells, although CK2 was suggested as a positive regulator of the Hh signal transduction pathway and two serine residues in Smo were phosphorylated by CK2 in Drosophila [43]. However, this mechanism on Smo phosphorylation by CK2 does not appear to apply to humans, as these two Smo residues are not conserved in human Smo when aligned with Clustal W [44] (Figure S5). Furthermore, several studies have suggested that mammalian Smo and Drosophila Smo are regulated by fundamentally distinct mechanisms [45], [46]. Recently, Chen et al. demonstrated that mammalian Smo is activated through multi-site phosphorylation by CK1α and GRK2 and proposed two-step mechanism for Smo phosphorylation in mammalian cells [47].

To investigate the potential mechanism through which CK2 positively regulates human Gli1 expression and transcriptional activity, we performed protein degradation assay of Gli1 after treatment with CK2α siRNA. Our results indicated that CK2 silencing reduces the half-life of human Gil1 protein in A549 cells. Furthermore, both CK2 siRNA and small molecule inhibitors down-regulated Gli1-boosted transcriptional activity. Moreover, forced over-expression of CK2α resulted in Gli1 transcriptional activity. In addition, we found two predicted CK2 phosphorylation sites in human Gli1 by using Scansite with medium stringency [48] (Figure S6). Our data suggest that CK2 may regulate Gli1 in human cancer cells in a similar manner with that in Drosophila. For instance, Jia et al. reported that CK2 directly phosphorylates Ci in Drosophila, and then prevents its ubiquitination and degradation [43]. On the other hand, it has been proposed that glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta negatively regulates Gli1 transcription factors cooperating with other kinases such as PKA and CK1s in lung cancer A549 cells [49]. Thus, two steps are probably involved in the positive regulation of Gli1 by CK2. In the first step, inhibition of CK2 promotes Gli1 degradation, followed by reduced accumulation of Gli1 in nuclear compartment. In the second step, as the key transcription factor of the Hh pathway, the reduced Gli1 protein subsequently suppresses the transcription of the Hh target genes. This in turn, forms a feedback loop to further decrease the expression level of Gli1, which is acting as a target gene of the pathway (Figure 4E). Although the mechanism of CK2 regulation in human cancers remains largely unknown, there is evidence that CK2 is essential for Wnt/beta-catenin signaling [50], [51]. For instance, it was implicated that CK2 may bind and phosphorylate β-catenin and promotes its degradation [52]. Taken together, these results suggest that CK2α may stabilize of human Gli1 protein through direct phosphorylation. Further studies are needed to elucidate the precise mechanisms.

The Hh pathway transcription factor Gli1 regulates the expression of the ABC transporter protein ABCG2 by directly binding to the ABCG2 promoter [27], ABCG2 is a molecular determinant of the SP phenotype and expressed at higher levels in SP cells, compared with non-SP cells [28], [31]. The SP cells are reportedly enriched with cancer stem cells, as they shows stem-cell properties (highly tumurigenic and chemo-resistant). Previous studies have detected SP phenotype with higher ABCG2 expression level and implicated ABCG2 as a CSC marker in lung cancer A549 cells [28]. For instance, SP cells in A549 showed more tumurigenic potential [29]. In our study, the target gene of Hh/Gli signaling ABCG2 was down-regulated after CK2α inhibition, where ABCG2-driven side population was reduced subsequently. Thus, we report that CK2 participates in CSCs maintenance by regulating Hh/Gli signaling.

Hh pathway may play key roles in the maintenance of CSCs, however the druggable targets in Hh pathway is very limited. CK2 provide an additional target for the inhibition of Hh/Gli signaling. CK2 inhibitors have not been extensively developed as therapeutic agents, partially due to that the ATP-binding pocket of CK2 is not as druggable as some other protein kinases [50], [53], [54]. To date, only one small-molecule CK2 inhibitor has been entered to clinical trials as a potential anticancer drug. CX-4945, a highly selective CK2 small molecule inhibitor, is a promising first-in-class oral therapeutic agent targeting multiple human cancers. CX-4945 shows a favorable safety profile in Phase I clinical trials [55]. In addition, CIGB-300 (a synthetic peptide-based drug targeting the CK2 phosphoaceptor domain) has proved to be safe and of clinical benefit in Phase I cervical cancer trials [56].

In summary, we report that CK2 is a positive regulator in the Hh/Gli signaling pathway, and the inhibition of CK2α down-regulates Hh/Gli signaling in human lung cancer cells. Given the emerging importance of Hh/Gli signaling in tumor initiation and progression, our findings provide an important evidence for the potential benefits of CK2 inhibitors.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture and Small Molecule Treatment

Human NSCLC cell lines (A549, A427, H460, H1299, H1650, H358, H838 and H322) were obtained from American Type Culture Collections (Manassas, VA). Cells were routinely maintained in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 µg/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml). All cells were routinely cultivated at 37°C in a humid incubator with 5% CO2. Treatment with CX-4945 (Synkinase, San Diego, CA) and TBB (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) dissolved in DMSO was administered at several dosages (1, 3 and 10 µM of CX4945; 10, 30, 50 µM of TBB). Cells were grown in medium for 48 hours after treatment.

SiRNA and Plasmid DNA Transfection

CK2α, CK2α′ and CK2β-specific siRNAs (ON-TARGET plus SMARTpool) and control RNA were purchased from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA). In brief, cells were seeded in a 6-well plate as 105 cells/well one day before transfection, with a target of 30–50% confluency at the time of transfection. Cells were transfected with 50 nmol/L of siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Adequate inhibition of the siRNA-mediated knockdown was confirmed by RT-PCR. The pcDNA3.1-CK2α or control pcDNA3.1-LacZ plasmid vectors were then transfected into the A549 cells (0.5 µg/ml in 24-well plate) using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were harvested for RT-PCR and Western blot or used in reporter assays at 48 hours post-transfection.

RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis and Semi-quantitative RT-PCR

Isolation of RNA was performed using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Human Lung Total RNA was purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Five-hundred ng of total RNA was converted into 20 µl cDNA using iScript cDNA Synthesis Kits (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA,) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. PCR bands were visualized under UV light and photographed.

Real-Time RT-PCR

A total of 2 µl of the reverse transcription reaction were used as template for real-time detection of Gli1 expression using TaqMan Technology on an Applied Biosystems 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Gene expression was quantitated for the tested genes (Gli1, Ptc1, Ptc2 and Cyclin E1) and endogenous control gene b-glucuronidase (GUSB) using the primer and probe sequences commercially (Applied Biosystems).

Western Blot Analysis and Immunofluorescence Staining

Whole protein was extracted by M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo) from cell lines added with Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail Set II (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) and Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktails (Roche, Lewes, UK) according to manufactures’ protocols. The proteins were separated on 4–15% gradient SDS–polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Bellerica, MA). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CK2α (Millipore), anti-Gli1 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), anti-ABCG2 (Millipore), and anti-GAPDH (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD). After being incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies, the antigen-antibody complexes were detected by using an ECL blotting analysis system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Immunofluorescence staining was carried out. Examination was done using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSM510, Carl Zeiss, Oakland, CA). Digital images of single confocal slices were prepared using Adobe Photoshop 6.0.

Protein Degradation Assay

The CK2α- and control siRNA-transtected A549 cells were exposed to 50 µg/ml cycloheximide and harvested at the time points of 0 and 6 hours. Total cellular proteins were extracted and were analyzed by western blot analysis.

Luciferase Reporter Assays

To measure Gli-mediated Hh transcriptional activity, the luciferase reporter constructs, 8× wild-type Gli binding site (8× Gliwt Luc) or 8× mutant Gli binding site (8× Glimut Luc) plasmids [57] and a human Gli1 expression vector (pcDNA3.1-Gli1) were co-transfected into A549 cells in 24-well plate. The Renilla luciferase pRL-TK plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI), whose expression is driven by the housekeeping thymidine kinase gene promoter, was co-transfected to normalize for transfection efficiency. All transfection experiments were performed using the Lipofectamine2000 (Invitrogen) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. After 24 h cells were lysed and luciferase assays were performed as described previously [58]. Results are expressed as fold induction, which is the ratio of luciferase activity induced in Gli-transfected cells relative to basal luciferase activity in control transfected A549 cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate; means and standard errors were calculated using Student’s t-test.

Flow Cytometry Analysis and Sorting

Identification of SP cells was performed as described previously by Goodell et al. [42]. The A549 cells were incubated with 5 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 dye (Invitrogen) for 90 min with and without 50 µM verapamil. Cell samples were analyzed and sorted using a Moflo MLS cell sorter (Beckman-Coulter, Hialeah, FL) with UV capabilities and SUMMIT software for data acquisition and analysis. An argon laser was used to excite the Hoechst dye. Fluorescence emission was collected with a 405/30 nm bandpass filter for Hoechst blue and a 670/40 nm bandpass filter for Hoechst red. Dead cells were excluded by propidium iodide fluorescence at 670/30 nm. The SP and non-SP cells were sorted for further test of their ABCG2 gene expression.

Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments. All of the statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 13.0 for Windows software system (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Student’s t-test was used to compare the differences among groups. Pearson product correlation tests (in the form of a correlation matrix) were used to analyze the mRNA level of CK2 and Gli1. A significant difference was declared if the P value from a two-tailed test was less than 0.05 (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01).

Supplementary materials and methods are shown in Text S1.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Silencing of CK2 substrates genes expression by siRNA. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the efficiency of RNA interference was monitored by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The corresponding mRNA levels of the three subunits decreased, and the knockdown of α and α′ was confirmed by co-transfection.


Figure S2

The expression of the indicated Hh pathway components, detected by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The results showed that Ptc and Gli1 gene expression in A549 and H1299 was consistently down-regulated after CK2α and β knockdown, whereas no obvious changes were revealed in other HH pathway components.


Figure S3

Treatments with TBB or CX4945 led to a dose-dependent decrease of Gli1 mRNA level both in A549 and H1299, which was detected by semi-quantitative RT-PCR.


Figure S4

The sorted SP cells showed higher expression of ABCG2 than non-SP cells in semi-quantitative RT-PCR, however, no difference of ABCG2 expression in SP or non-SP cells was shown between the CK2α siRNA and control.


Figure S5

Multiple sequence alignment of Smoothened with peptides indentified by Proteomics analysis. Hh membrane receptor Smo in human (NCBI Reference Sequence: EAL24102.1) and Drosophila melanogaster (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_523443.1) was aligned with Clustal W software. The two serine phosphorylation sites of CK2 (indicated in box) in Drosophila do not exist in humans, indicating that the regulation of Hh by CK2 is a Smo phosphorylation-independent reaction.


Figure S6

The phosphorylation prediction results of human Gli1 with CK2. Two CK2 phosphorylation sites (indicated in box) in Gli1 (NCBI Reference Sequence: AAM13391.1) were predicted using Scansite 2.0 with medium stringency.


Text S1

Supplementary materials and methods.



We thank Pamela Derish and Li Tai Fang of the UCSF Department of Surgery for editorial assistance with the manuscript and correlation analysis. We also thank Tara Rambaldo of USCF Laboratory for Cell Analysis for cell sorting.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: The present work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 CA140654-01A1 (LY) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, P.R.C. 2009 (9451008901003072). We are also grateful for support from the Kazan, McClain, Abrams, Fernandez, Lyons, Greenwood, Harley & Oberman Foundation, Inc; the Estate of Robert Griffiths; the Jeffrey and Karen Peterson Family Foundation; Paul and Michelle Zygielbaum; the Estate of Norman Mancini; and the Barbara Isackson Lung Cancer Research Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Meggio F, Pinna LA. One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2? FASEB J. 2003;17:349–368. [PubMed]
2. Raaf J, Bischoff N, Klopffleisch K, Brunstein E, Olsen BB, et al. Interaction between CK2alpha and CK2beta, the subunits of protein kinase CK2: thermodynamic contributions of key residues on the CK2alpha surface. Biochemistry. 2011;50:512–522. [PubMed]
3. Guo C, Yu S, Davis AT, Ahmed K. Nuclear matrix targeting of the protein kinase CK2 signal as a common downstream response to androgen or growth factor stimulation of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1999;59:1146–1151. [PubMed]
4. Buchou T, Vernet M, Blond O, Jensen HH, Pointu H, et al. Disruption of the regulatory beta subunit of protein kinase CK2 in mice leads to a cell-autonomous defect and early embryonic lethality. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:908–915. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Ahmad KA, Wang G, Unger G, Slaton J, Ahmed K. Protein kinase CK2–a key suppressor of apoptosis. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2008;48:179–187. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Dominguez I, Sonenshein GE, Seldin DC. Protein kinase CK2 in health and disease: CK2 and its role in Wnt and NF-kappaB signaling: linking development and cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:1850–1857. [PubMed]
7. Trembley JH, Wang G, Unger G, Slaton J, Ahmed K. Protein kinase CK2 in health and disease: CK2: a key player in cancer biology. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:1858–1867. [PubMed]
8. Piazza FA, Ruzzene M, Gurrieri C, Montini B, Bonanni L, et al. Multiple myeloma cell survival relies on high activity of protein kinase CK2. Blood. 2006;108:1698–1707. [PubMed]
9. Wang G, Ahmad KA, Harris NH, Ahmed K. Impact of protein kinase CK2 on inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in prostate cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2008;316:91–97. [PubMed]
10. Martins LR, Lucio P, Silva MC, Anderes KL, Gameiro P, et al. Targeting CK2 overexpression and hyperactivation as a novel therapeutic tool in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2010;116:2724–2731. [PubMed]
11. Laramas M, Pasquier D, Filhol O, Ringeisen F, Descotes JL, et al. Nuclear localization of protein kinase CK2 catalytic subunit (CK2alpha) is associated with poor prognostic factors in human prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:928–934. [PubMed]
12. Kim JS, Eom JI, Cheong JW, Choi AJ, Lee JK, et al. Protein kinase CK2alpha as an unfavorable prognostic marker and novel therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1019–1028. [PubMed]
13. Lin KY, Fang CL, Chen Y, Li CF, Chen SH, et al. Overexpression of nuclear protein kinase CK2 Beta subunit and prognosis in human gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1695–1702. [PubMed]
14. Duncan JS, Litchfield DW. Too much of a good thing: the role of protein kinase CK2 in tumorigenesis and prospects for therapeutic inhibition of CK2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1784:33–47. [PubMed]
15. Guerra B. Protein kinase CK2 subunits are positive regulators of AKT kinase. Int J Oncol. 2006;28:685–693. [PubMed]
16. Beachy PA, Karhadkar SS, Berman DM. Tissue repair and stem cell renewal in carcinogenesis. Nature. 2004;432:324–331. [PubMed]
17. Ingham PW, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3059–3087. [PubMed]
18. Ingham PW, Nakano Y, Seger C. Mechanisms and functions of Hedgehog signalling across the metazoa. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:393–406. [PubMed]
19. Ng JM, Curran T. The Hedgehog’s tale: developing strategies for targeting cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:493–501. [PubMed]
20. Takebe N, Harris PJ, Warren RQ, Ivy SP. Targeting cancer stem cells by inhibiting Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog pathways. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:97–106. [PubMed]
21. Ruiz i Altaba A. Therapeutic inhibition of Hedgehog-GLI signaling in cancer: epithelial, stromal, or stem cell targets? Cancer Cell. 2008;14:281–283. [PubMed]
22. Kinzler KW, Bigner SH, Bigner DD, Trent JM, Law ML, et al. Identification of an amplified, highly expressed gene in a human glioma. Science. 1987;236:70–73. [PubMed]
23. Dahmane N, Lee J, Robins P, Heller P, Ruiz i Altaba A. Activation of the transcription factor Gli1 and the Sonic hedgehog signalling pathway in skin tumours. Nature. 1997;389:876–881. [PubMed]
24. Epstein EH. Basal cell carcinomas: attack of the hedgehog. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:743–754. [PubMed]
25. Nilsson M, Unden AB, Krause D, Malmqwist U, Raza K, et al. Induction of basal cell carcinomas and trichoepitheliomas in mice overexpressing GLI-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:3438–3443. [PubMed]
26. Yuan Z, Goetz JA, Singh S, Ogden SK, Petty WJ, et al. Frequent requirement of hedgehog signaling in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncogene. 2007;26:1046–1055. [PubMed]
27. Singh RR, Kunkalla K, Qu C, Schlette E, Neelapu SS, et al. ABCG2 is a direct transcriptional target of hedgehog signaling and involved in stroma-induced drug tolerance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncogene. 2011;30(49):4874–4886. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Scharenberg CW, Harkey MA, Torok-Storb B. The ABCG2 transporter is an efficient Hoechst 33342 efflux pump and is preferentially expressed by immature human hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 2002;99:507–512. [PubMed]
29. Ho MM, Ng AV, Lam S, Hung JY. Side population in human lung cancer cell lines and tumors is enriched with stem-like cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:4827–4833. [PubMed]
30. Shi Y, Fu X, Hua Y, Han Y, Lu Y, et al. The Side Population in Human Lung Cancer Cell Line NCI-H460 Is Enriched in Stem-Like Cancer Cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33358. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Balbuena J, Pachon G, Lopez-Torrents G, Aran JM, Castresana JS, et al. ABCG2 is required to control the sonic hedgehog pathway in side population cells with stem-like properties. Cytometry A. 2011;79A:672–683. [PubMed]
32. Tian F, Mysliwietz J, Ellwart J, Gamarra F, Huber RM, et al. Effects of the Hedgehog pathway inhibitor GDC-0449 on lung cancer cell lines are mediated by side populations. Clin Exp Med. 2012;12:25–30. [PubMed]
33. Scaglioni PP, Yung TM, Cai LF, Erdjument-Bromage H, Kaufman AJ, et al. A CK2-dependent mechanism for degradation of the PML tumor suppressor. Cell. 2006;126:269–283. [PubMed]
34. Hung MS, Lin YC, Mao JH, Kim IJ, Xu Z, et al. Functional polymorphism of the CK2alpha intronless gene plays oncogenic roles in lung cancer. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11418. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Niemann C, Unden AB, Lyle S, Zouboulis ChC, Toftgard R, et al. Indian hedgehog and beta-catenin signaling: role in the sebaceous lineage of normal and neoplastic mammalian epidermis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:11873–11880. [PubMed]
36. Sarno S, Reddy H, Meggio F, Ruzzene M, Davies SP, et al. Selectivity of 4,5,6,7-tetrabromobenzotriazole, an ATP site-directed inhibitor of protein kinase CK2 (‘casein kinase-2’). FEBS Lett. 2001;496:44–48. [PubMed]
37. Pierre F, Chua PC, O’Brien SE, Siddiqui-Jain A, Bourbon P, et al. Discovery and SAR of 5-(3-chlorophenylamino)benzo[c][2,6]naphthyridine-8-carboxylic acid (CX-4945), the first clinical stage inhibitor of protein kinase CK2 for the treatment of cancer. J Med Chem. 2011;54:635–654. [PubMed]
38. Duman-Scheel M, Weng L, Xin S, Du W. Hedgehog regulates cell growth and proliferation by inducing Cyclin D and Cyclin E. Nature. 2002;417:299–304. [PubMed]
39. Kondo T, Setoguchi T, Taga T. Persistence of a small subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:781–786. [PubMed]
40. Patrawala L, Calhoun T, Schneider-Broussard R, Zhou J, Claypool K, et al. Side population is enriched in tumorigenic, stem-like cancer cells, whereas ABCG2+ and ABCG2- cancer cells are similarly tumorigenic. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6207–6219. [PubMed]
41. Haraguchi N, Utsunomiya T, Inoue H, Tanaka F, Mimori K, et al. Characterization of a side population of cancer cells from human gastrointestinal system. Stem Cells. 2006;24:506–513. [PubMed]
42. Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, Conner AS, Mulligan RC. Isolation and functional properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo. J Exp Med. 1996;183:1797–1806. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Jia H, Liu Y, Xia R, Tong C, Yue T, et al. Casein kinase 2 promotes Hedgehog signaling by regulating both smoothened and Cubitus interruptus. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:37218–37226. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–2948. [PubMed]
45. Varjosalo M, Li SP, Taipale J. Divergence of hedgehog signal transduction mechanism between Drosophila and mammals. Dev Cell. 2006;10:177–186. [PubMed]
46. Huangfu D, Anderson KV. Signaling from Smo to Ci/Gli: conservation and divergence of Hedgehog pathways from Drosophila to vertebrates. Development. 2006;133:3–14. [PubMed]
47. Chen Y, Sasai N, Ma G, Yue T, Jia J, et al. Sonic Hedgehog dependent phosphorylation by CK1alpha and GRK2 is required for ciliary accumulation and activation of smoothened. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001083. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Obenauer JC, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB. Scansite 2.0: Proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3635–3641. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Mizuarai S, Kawagishi A, Kotani H. Inhibition of p70S6K2 down-regulates Hedgehog/GLI pathway in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Mol Cancer. 2009;8:44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Sarno S, Pinna LA. Protein kinase CK2 as a druggable target. Mol Biosyst. 2008;4:889–894. [PubMed]
51. Gao Y, Wang HY. Casein kinase 2 Is activated and essential for Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:18394–18400. [PubMed]
52. Song DH, Sussman DJ, Seldin DC. Endogenous protein kinase CK2 participates in Wnt signaling in mammary epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:23790–23797. [PubMed]
53. Cozza G, Meggio F, Moro S. The dark side of protein kinase CK2 inhibition. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18:2867–2884. [PubMed]
54. Cozza G, Bortolato A, Moro S. How druggable is protein kinase CK2? Med Res Rev. 2010;30:419–462. [PubMed]
55. Pierre F, Chua PC, O’Brien SE, Siddiqui-Jain A, Bourbon P, et al. Pre-clinical characterization of CX-4945, a potent and selective small molecule inhibitor of CK2 for the treatment of cancer. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;356:37–43. [PubMed]
56. Perea SE, Baladron I, Garcia Y, Perera Y, Lopez A, et al. CIGB-300, a synthetic peptide-based drug that targets the CK2 phosphoaceptor domain. Translational and clinical research. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;356:45–50. [PubMed]
57. Sasaki H, Hui C, Nakafuku M, Kondoh H. A binding site for Gli proteins is essential for HNF-3beta floor plate enhancer activity in transgenics and can respond to Shh in vitro. Development. 1997;124:1313–1322. [PubMed]
58. Dhoot GK, Gustafsson MK, Ai X, Sun W, Standiford DM, et al. Regulation of Wnt signaling and embryo patterning by an extracellular sulfatase. Science. 2001;293:1663–1666. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science