|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Nucleosome positioning is important for the structural integrity of chromosomes. During metaphase the mitotic spindle exerts physical force on pericentromeric chromatin. The cell must adjust the pericentromeric chromatin to accommodate the changing tension resulting from microtubule dynamics to maintain a stable metaphase spindle. Here we examine the effects of spindle-based tension on nucleosome dynamics by measuring the histone turnover of the chromosome arm and the pericentromere during metaphase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that both histones H2B and H4 exhibit greater turnover in the pericentromere during metaphase. Loss of spindle-based tension by treatment with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole or compromising kinetochore function results in reduced histone turnover in the pericentromere. Pericentromeric histone dynamics are influenced by the chromatin-remodeling activities of STH1/NPS1 and ISW2. Sth1p is the ATPase component of the Remodels the Structure of Chromatin (RSC) complex, and Isw2p is an ATP-dependent DNA translocase member of the Imitation Switch (ISWI) subfamily of chromatin-remodeling factors. The balance between displacement and insertion of pericentromeric histones provides a mechanism to accommodate spindle-based tension while maintaining proper chromatin packaging during mitosis.
Nucleosomes form the basis for packaging of DNA into chromatin. Two copies each of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 are wrapped by 145–147 base pairs of DNA (Luger et al., 1997 ). Histone protein levels are tightly regulated, as both overexpression and depletion have deleterious effects, including disruption of nucleosome organization surrounding the centromere (Saunders et al., 1990 ). Histone genes are transcribed and the protein incorporated during DNA replication. Histone deposition is believed to occur in a stepwise manner, with H3–H4 tetramers bound first, followed by two H2A–H2B dimers (Verreault, 2000 ; Akey and Luger, 2003 ). Histone eviction has been proposed to occur in reverse, with H2A/H2B being more mobile than H3/H4 (Kimura and Cook, 2001 ; Jamai et al., 2007 ). Outside of replication-dependent histone incorporation, histones are known to be dynamic during transcription in a manner dependent on RNA polymerase II (Widmer et al., 1984 ; Lee et al., 2004 ; Chen et al., 2005 ; Kimura, 2005 ; Thiriet and Hayes, 2005 ; Dion et al., 2007 ; Kim et al., 2007 ; Deal et al., 2010 ; Lopes da Rosa et al., 2011 ).
Individual histones display different dynamic properties within actively transcribed or silent regions. Histone H2B is dynamic at both active and inactive loci, whereas histone H3 is dynamic predominantly at active loci (Pusarla and Bhargava, 2005 ; Jamai et al., 2007 ). Histone H3 displays rapid exchange at highly transcribed regions, such as rRNA gene loci, associated with the incorporation of an H3 variant (Ahmad and Henikoff, 2002 ; Thiriet and Hayes, 2005 ; Lopes da Rosa et al., 2011 ). Histones are stable during metaphase in HeLa cells when transcription is silenced, and when transcription resumes upon anaphase onset histones are found to be more dynamic (Chen et al., 2005 ). Similarly, histones are exchanged during a single cell cycle in yeast (Cho et al., 1998 ; Schwabish and Struhl, 2004 ).
Histone dynamics are regulated by ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes, which in budding yeast include the Imitation Switch (ISWI) and switching defective 2/sucrose nonfermenting 2 (SWI2/SNF2; SWI/SNF and Remodels the Structure of Chromatin [RSC]) families of chromatin remodelers (Clapier and Cairns, 2009 ). The ISWI family is known to remodel nucleosomes as well as function as a chromatin assembly factor (Corona et al., 1999 ). Isw2p is the nucleosome-stimulated ATPase of the ISW2 complex in the ISWI family of chromatin remodelers that exhibits nucleosome-spacing activities resulting in increased nucleosome occupancy (Tsukiyama et al., 1999 ; Flaus and Owen-Hughes, 2003 ; Whitehouse et al., 2003 , 2007 ). Isw2p is located throughout the nucleus in budding yeast (Supplemental Figure S1). Antagonistic activities of ISW2 and SWI/SNF control gene expression; ISW2 increases nucleosome occupancy to exclude SWI/SNF and silence gene expression (Tomar et al., 2009 ). The yeast SWI/SNF and RSC remodeling complexes contain the conserved homologous ATPase subunits Swi2p/Snf2p and Sth1p/Nps1p, respectively (Tsuchiya et al., 1992 ; Cairns et al., 1996 ; Du et al., 1998 ; Vignali et al., 2000 ). Sth1p/Nps1p demonstrates DNA-dependent ATPase activity resulting in the eviction of nucleosomes (Lorch et al., 2006 ; Chaban et al., 2008 ; Parnell et al., 2008 ; Erkina et al., 2010 ), is essential for mitotic growth (Cairns et al., 1996 ; Cao et al., 1997 ; Tsuchiya et al., 1998 ; Xue et al., 2000 ; Saha et al., 2002 ), and is located throughout the nucleus (Supplemental Figure S1).
RSC is required for chromatin organization in the pericentromere and kinetochore structure in budding yeast (Tsuchiya et al., 1998 ; Hsu et al., 2003 ). Loss of Sth1p/Nps1p function results in reduced histone occupancy around the centromere by nucleosome-scanning assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation (Desai et al., 2009 ) and leads to cell cycle arrest at G2/M. Nucleosomes flanking the centromere are subject to disruptive tension from the spindle, which would require removing mislocalized nucleosomes and reloading them in the proper position. In the absence of nucleosome removal (i.e., loss of RSC), the nucleosomes flanking the centromere cannot be efficiently repositioned and become disorganized, and the net effect is reduced overall occupancy (Desai et al., 2009 ).
The pericentromere is approximately 50 kb of chromatin flanking the centromere forming a C-loop (Yeh et al., 2008 ). This chromatin is located in a defined region in metaphase cells (~800 × ~300 nm cylinder between the spindle pole bodies; Figure 1A), corresponding to the region enriched for cohesin and condensin (Yeh et al., 2008 ; Stephens et al., 2011 ). The pericentromeric chromatin acts as an elastic spring to balance the outward forces exerted by the mitotic spindle in metaphase (Bouck and Bloom, 2007 ; Stephens et al., 2011 ). To determine the contribution of histone dynamics in packaging and maintaining the metaphase chromatin spring, we measured histone turnover within the pericentromere and its regulation by ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factors. We show that regulation of histone dynamics by chromatin remodelers is important for kinetochore structure, pericentromeric chromatin organization, and metaphase spindle length.
We determined the dynamics of histones H2B and H4 in the pericentromere and the chromosome arm during metaphase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by measuring the half-life (t½) of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Strains containing histone tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and spindle pole bodies tagged with red fluorescent protein (RFP; see Table 1 in Materials and Methods) allowed us to demarcate the pericentromere from chromosomal arms in a living cell. The pericentromere lies between the spindle pole bodies (Yeh et al., 2008 ), and the chromosome arms are distal to the spindle (Figure 1).
Histones within the pericentromere exhibit faster turnover rates than in the chromosome arms. Histone H2B has a t½ of 62 s in the pericentromere during metaphase, compared with 87 s in the arm (Figures 1B and and2A2A and Supplemental Table S1). Histone H4 has a t½ of 76 s in the pericentromere, compared with 121 s in the chromosome arm (Figures 1C and and2A2A and Supplemental Table S2). H2B is more dynamic than H4 in both regions of the chromosome. For both H2B and H4, the t½ values of the chromosome arm are significantly slower than those of the pericentromere (Student's t test, p < 0.05). The final percentage recoveries of histone protein were found to be similar for both regions and histones measured, indicating similar levels of mobile protein (Figure 2B and Supplemental Tables S1 and S2). The individual dynamics of H2B and H4 both within the pericentromere and the arms are consistent with the observations that each histone pair, H2A/H2B and H3/H4, is independently regulated (Jackson, 1987 ; Smith and Stillman, 1991 ; Ladoux et al., 2000 ; Akey and Luger, 2003 ; Jin et al., 2005 ; Thiriet and Hayes, 2005 ).
To determine whether histone dynamics in the pericentromere were influenced by spindle-based tension, we treated cells with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole (noc) and examined histone half-life. In nocodazole-arrested cells, the spindle pole bodies collapse into a single diffraction-limited spot and the pericentromeric chromatin remains adjacent to the spindle pole bodies. On photobleaching, we observed two populations of histone recovery. There was a significant reduction in the number of cells with measurable H4 recovery dynamics in the pericentromere, with the chromosome arm largely unaffected (pericentromere, 92% untreated wild type (WT) vs. 55% noc treated; arm, 97% untreated WT vs. 85% noc treated; Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 3A). H2B also showed a decrease in cells exhibiting measurable dynamics (pericentromere, 92% untreated WT vs. 74% noc treated; arm, 100% untreated WT vs. 83% noc treated), but these were not found to be statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 3A).
When histone recovery was measurable, H2B half-life was significantly slowed in the pericentromere (62 s untreated WT vs. 121 s noc treated; Student's t test, p < 0.05; Figure 3B and Supplemental Table S1). There was no significant change in H2B recovery in the chromosome arm upon nocodazole treatment or any significant changes in final percentage recovery (Figure 3, B and andC).C). Therefore, upon reduction of spindle tension by nocodazole treatment, the dynamics of pericentromeric H2B and H4 are reduced.
An alternative method to reduce pericentric tension was used by introducing a conditional allele of the kinetochore protein Nuf2 (Gal-NUF2). On galactose (gal) media the cells express NUF2 and are able to assemble the kinetochore, whereas on glucose (glu) media NUF2 expression is repressed compromising kinetochore function (Bouck and Bloom, 2005 ). Loss of Nuf2p resulted in reduced histone dynamics in the pericentromere but not the chromosome arm for both H2B and H4 (H2B: pericentromere, 62 s WT vs. 94 s Gal-NUF2 on glu; arm, 87 s WT vs. 86 s Gal-NUF2 on glu; H4: pericentromere, 76 s WT vs. 97 s Gal-NUF2 on glu; arm, 121 s WT vs. 135 s Gal-NUF2 on glu; Student's t test, p < 0.05; Figure 3B and Supplemental Tables S1 and S2). The final percentage recovery of H2B was not significantly affected, whereas the final percentage recovery of H4 in the pericentromere was significantly reduced (64% WT vs. 30% Gal-NUF2 on glu; Figure 3C), indicating a reduced level of mobile histones. Thus, like nocodazole treatment, the loss of spindle tension via reduction of kinetochore function results in significantly reduced histone dynamics in the pericentromere and not in the chromosome arm.
At least two properties of histone dynamics can contribute to the observed behavior in the pericentromere: either the histones are removed from DNA more frequently in the pericentromere, or histones are replaced more quickly, leaving binding sites in the arm unbound longer. To address these possible explanations, we examined the dynamics of H2B tagged with a photoactivatable GFP (paGFP) fluorophore (Vorvis et al., 2008 ).
The highly dynamic nature of proteins can be visualized using photoactivation (Figure 4A). As a control, we examined the dispersion characteristics of photoactivated Erg6p, a membrane protein involved in ergosterol biosynthesis (Gaber et al., 1989 ; Vorvis et al., 2008 ). Erg6p exhibited dispersion in all of the examined cells, indicative of a high level of dynamics (Figure 4B and Supplemental Table S3). Dispersion was measured by quantifying the loss of signal intensity in a 2.6 × 2.6 μm area over time (20 × 20 pixels; Materials and Methods). Photoactivation of H2B in the pericentromere and chromosome arm reveals that the percentage of cells showing histone dispersion is not significantly different in the pericentromere and the chromosome arm (79 vs. 83%, respectively; Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 4B). The removal dynamics of histone protein are not different in the pericentromere and chromosome arm. Therefore the increased histone dynamics observed by FRAP in the pericentromere under tension are likely the result of active processes replacing lost histones more rapidly.
Loss of spindle tension leads to a significant decrease in the percentage of cells displaying dispersion of photoactivated H2B in the pericentromere but not the chromosome arm (pericentromere, 79% untreated WT vs. 33% noc treated; arm, 83% untreated WT vs. 46% noc treated; Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 4B). The reduced histone dispersion in the pericentromere in collapsed spindles points to reduced histone removal from the DNA in the absence of tension. The FRAP and photoactivation data indicate an active histone replacement time under tension and an increased histone dwell time (slower off rate) in the pericentromere upon loss of spindle tension.
To address whether chromatin remodelers are involved in nucleosome exchange at the pericentromere, we measured histone dynamics in mutations in RSC (STH1/NPS1) and ISW2. In the absence of RSC activity (nps1-105 temperature-sensitive allele), cells arrest in metaphase with defects in kinetochore assembly and segregation (Tsuchiya et al., 1998 ; Hsu et al., 2003 ). In the nps1-105 mutant at permissive temperature (24°C), there is a significant decrease in the percentage of cells exhibiting measurable histone-GFP recovery in the pericentromere (H2B, 92% WT vs. 60% nps1-105; H4, 92% WT vs. 58% nps1-105; Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 3A and Supplemental Tables S1 and S2). Of the cells with measurable histone recovery, the t½ of H2B is significantly slowed as compared with wild type (pericentromere, 62 s WT vs. 116 s nps1-105; arm: 87 s WT vs. 125 s nps1-105; Student's t test, p < 0.05, Figure 3B). The t½ of H4 is also significantly altered in both the pericentromere and chromosome arm in nps1-105 cells as compared with wild-type (pericentromere, 76 s WT vs. 119 s nps1-105; arm, 121 s WT vs. 75 s nps1-105; Student's t test, p < 0.05; Figure 3B). The final percentage recovery of histone H4 in nps1-105 cells is significantly reduced from wild type in the pericentromere but unaffected in the chromosome arm (pericentromere, 64% WT vs. 33% nps1-105; arm, 52% WT vs. 60% nps1-105; Student's t test, p < 0.05; Figure 3C). Histone exchange in the pericentromere is dependent upon a fully functional RSC complex. When the photoactivatable H2B is used, the fraction of cells exhibiting dispersion is unchanged (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 4B). Thus histones are evicted in nps1-105, but the mechanisms replacing lost histones are diminished (Figure 3, A and andBB).
RSC chromatin remodeling during metaphase primarily affects the histone dynamics in the pericentromere, with histone dynamics in the chromosome arm affected to a lesser degree. The nucleus-wide alteration of histone dynamics is consistent with the essential nature of STH1/NPS1. However, histones in the pericentromere more often display no measurable recovery (Figure 3A), indicating a regional specificity for RSC chromatin-remodeling activity.
The requirement for antagonistic chromatin remodeling has been demonstrated at promoter regions to control expression levels (Tomar et al., 2009 ; Erkina et al., 2010 ). We reasoned that histone occupancy at the pericentromere might also reflect balanced chromatin remodeling. ISW2 has been found to counter the histone removal activity of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling (Tomar et al., 2009 ).
In the absence of ISW2 activity (isw2Δ), the t½ of both histones H2B and H4 is significantly slower in the pericentromere but not the chromosome arm as compared with wild-type cells. H2B t½ slows from 62 s in wild type to 103 in isw2Δ cells, and H4 t½ slows from 76 s in wild-type cells to 119 s in isw2Δ cells (Student's t test, p < 0.05; Figure 3B and Supplemental Tables S1 and S2). Similarly, the final percentage recovery is significantly lower in the pericentromere but not the chromosome arm for both histones H2B and H4 (Student's t test, p < 0.05; Figure 3C). Wild-type H2B percentage recovery in the pericentromere is 58% and is reduced to 40% in isw2Δ cells. H4 percentage recovery in the pericentromere is 64% in wild-type cells and is reduced to 37% in isw2Δ cells. Consistent with the nonessential nature of ISW2, there is no significant difference in the percentage of cells showing measurable histone recovery between wild-type and isw2Δ cells (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 3A). As in the nps1-105 cells, there was no significant change in percentage of cells exhibiting dispersion after photoactivation in isw2Δ cells as compared with wild type (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 4B). These data suggest that the primary role for ISW2 is maintenance of nucleosome occupancy under tension by reloading histones rather than eviction, as there is no decrease in percentage of cells exhibiting measurable recovery (Figure 3A).
In yeast, the 16 kinetochores are clustered into a close-to-diffraction–limited spot. To address whether histone occupancy is important for this organization, we examined the structure of the inner (Ame1p-GFP or Ndc10p-GFP) and outer (Spc24p-GFP or Nuf2p-GFP) kinetochores (Figure 5, A and andB).B). From this analysis, we observed significant disruption of the kinetochores in conditions that perturb chromatin packaging.
We first examined kinetochore structure upon the depletion of histone H3 and found that the inner, but not the outer (as in Bouck and Bloom, 2007 ), kinetochore is disrupted (Figure 5C and Supplemental Table S4). Cells expressing the sole copy of H3 under the galactose promoter exhibit disruption of the inner kinetochore (Ndc10p-GFP) in 5% of cells. On reduction of histone H3—resulting in an approximately twofold reduction in nucleosome concentration—55% of the cells show disruption of the inner kinetochore, a significant increase (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 5C). Decreasing histone density specifically affects the inner kinetochore organization, leaving the microtubule-binding components (Nuf2p-GFP) structurally intact. The significant disruption of the inner kinetochores observed in H3-repressed cells is not simply the disaggregation of the 16 individual kinetochores, because the outer kinetochore components remain properly organized. Thus the underlying pericentromeric chromatin contributes to the structure of the inner kinetochore and the correct linkage with the microtubule-binding outer kinetochore.
Loss of RSC function (nps1-105 at restrictive temperature, 37°C) results in significant disruption of both the inner and outer kinetochores. The inner (Ame1p-GFP) and outer (Spc24p-GFP) kinetochores of nps1-105 cells are disrupted 37 and 24%, respectively, as compared with 6 and 7% in wild-type cells (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 5C and Supplemental Table S4). The increase in disruption is more dramatic in the inner kinetochore (6% WT vs. 37% nps1-105), supporting the hypothesis that disruption of the underlying chromatin results in disrupted kinetochore organization. The disruption of the outer kinetochore (Spc24p-GFP) in nps1-105 cells may suggest a role for RSC in kinetochore organization or stability. We did not observe increased kinetochore disruption in isw2Δ cells (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05; Figure 5C). Thus nucleosome density and mobility within pericentromeric chromatin is essential in maintaining kinetochore structure.
The proper organization of the pericentromere is essential for balancing spindle forces in metaphase, as well as for the attachment and alignment of sister chromatids. The work presented here provides a model for maintenance of histone occupancy in the pericentromere under tension through the balanced remodeling activities of RSC and ISW2 (Figure 6). The chromatin-remodeling activities of RSC and ISW2 are needed to maintain a balance of on and off rates of histones in the pericentromere. Loss of RSC activity (Figure 6D) results in reduced off rates (increased dwell time; Figure 3B) and slowed reloading of histones that are displaced (Figure 3B), as well as in disrupted kinetochore organization (Figure 5C). These data are consistent with roles for RSC in both histone removal and reloading. The loss of Isw2p (Figure 6E) also results in slower histone dynamics (Figure 3B), likely due to disrupted reloading of histones. Given that ISW2 is nonessential, other remodeling complexes may contribute to reloading histones at the pericentromere. ISW2 is known to interact genetically with various components of both the INO80 chromatin-remodeling complex and chromatin assembly complex (Collins et al., 2007 ; Vincent et al., 2008 ; Hannum et al., 2009 ; Costanzo et al., 2010 ), suggesting possible roles for these remodelers in the maintenance of histone occupancy in the pericentromere. Balanced remodeling at gene promoters is required for maintenance of proper gene expression (Tomar et al., 2009 ). These experiments demonstrated synthetic lethality between Isw2 and Snf2 of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex (Nps1/Sth1 is a Snf2 homologue). The remodeling activities of RSC and ISW2 are critical for nucleosome occupancy in the pericentromere while accommodating physical tension.
During chromosome segregation, the mitotic spindle exerts an outward force on the chromosomes that exceeds the amount of force required for nucleosome eviction (Nicklas, 1983 , 1988 ; Mihardja et al., 2006 ; Yan et al., 2007 ). We hypothesize that the eviction of nucleosomes under tension serves to equalize the tension across the pericentromeric chromatin. The cell must maintain a balance between nucleosome eviction and reloading to maintain kinetochore organization. Here we provide evidence coupling the imposition of mechanical force (spindle tension) to a distinct chemical reaction to remodel chromatin. Tension sensing is an important component of the spindle-assembly checkpoint, required for preventing aneuploidy and chromosome missegregation (Nicklas et al., 1995 ; Nicklas, 1997 ; Biggins and Murray, 2001 ; Stern and Murray, 2001 ; Musacchio and Salmon, 2007 ; Luo et al., 2010 ). To ensure consistent tension sensing, the chromatin spring must accommodate the fluctuating forces exerted by growing and shortening microtubules without DNA breaks. This consistent tension sensing is accomplished by the balanced off and on rates dictated, at least in part, by RSC and ISW2 chromatin remodeling.
In addition to examining the dynamics of nucleosome turnover in response to tension, this work suggests an ordered sequence of histone removal and deposition (Verreault, 2000 ; Kimura and Cook, 2001 ; Akey and Luger, 2003 ; Jamai et al., 2007 ). We find that in wild-type cells H2B dynamics are more rapid than those of H4 (Figure 2A). In the absence of tension due to nocodazole treatment, H2B turnover is significantly slower (Figure 3B), and fewer cells exhibit H4 recovery (Figure 3A) in the pericentromere. On repression of an essential kinetochore protein (Gal-NUF2), both H2B and H4 dynamics are slowed, and H4 exhibits a lower final percentage recovery, which indicates a lower mobile fraction (Figure 3, B and andC).C). From these data, we hypothesize that the H2A–H2B dimer must be removed to allow for H3–H4 tetramer mobility. This normal sequence of eviction and deposition seems to be abolished in the RSC mutant (nps1-105), as H4 turnover is more rapid than that of H2B in the chromosome arm (Figure 3B) and overall dynamics are suppressed in the pericentromere (Figure 3A). We hypothesize that RSC may play a role in directing the ordered remodeling of nucleosomes, and upon loss of RSC activity this stepwise remodeling is abolished. The observed differences in histone dynamics point to an ordered remodeling, which is accomplished in large part by RSC remodeling throughout the nucleus. From these data, we can hypothesize that histone eviction as a result of physical tension occurs in a two-step manner, with H2B being more mobile than H4.
This research shows that the pericentromere surrounding the point centromere of budding yeast is functionally distinct from the bulk chromosome arms during mitosis. Traditionally the pericentromere is delineated by histone modifications and variants that result in the unique state of chromatin at the centromere, which has been termed centrochromatin (Sullivan and Karpen, 2004 ). In addition to histone modifications and variants, the physical state of the chromatin serves to define the pericentromere. Chromatin under tension exhibits a distinct pattern of nucleosome dynamics that might functionally distinguish pericentromeric chromatin during mitosis in budding yeast.
The underlying pericentromeric chromatin is required to form kinetochore–microtubule attachments and maintain kinetochore clustering when under spindle-based tension. The platform on which the kinetochore is built depends on the sequence-specific centromere DNA, as well as on the flanking pericentromeric chromatin. Unlike promoters and repressors that serve as signposts for starting or stopping transcription, the centromere DNA locus forms a node within a larger chromatin network upon which the kinetochore is built. The finding that 55% of the inner kinetochores are disrupted without disruption of the outer kinetochore in H3-repressed cells reveals that the inner kinetochore relies on an intact chromatin foundation. In contrast, the outer kinetochore is less dependent on the underlying chromatin. We propose that the pericentromeric chromatin surrounding a point centromere contributes to the maintenance of kinetochore organization. The structure of the underlying foundation is likely to consist of chromatin meshwork under tension, organized around nodes of Cse4p.
We previously showed that the force produced by the mitotic spindle is not exerted in a linear manner between the sister centromeres (Yeh et al., 2008 ; Stephens et al., 2011 ). Instead, the chromatin loops, which are radially dispersed relative to the microtubule spindle axis, provide a vector perpendicular to the site of kinetochore–microtubule attachment and microtubule lengthening and shortening axis. The consequence of this organization is that the chromatin platform occupies a larger area than the sites of microtubule or kinetochore attachment. The organization of the pericentromeric chromatin into a surface platform containing both Cse4p- and H3-containing nucleosomes may be analogous to the organization of chromatin in larger regional centromeres, where a large surface of centromere chromatin is exposed on the surface of the chromosome. It is known that pericentromeric chromatin of regional centromeres is organized into a higher-order structure in which inner kinetochore components (such as CENP-T/W) are known to interact with H3-containing nucleosomes (Marshall et al., 2008 ; Santaguida and Musacchio, 2009 ; Ribeiro et al., 2010 ). The filamentous NDC80 complex connects the inner kinetochore plate to the outer microtubule-binding side of the kinetochore by associating with CENP-T/W via the Mis12 and Knl1 complexes. By building the inner kinetochore on a larger chromatin platform instead of foci of Cse4p, the linkage from the microtubule can be distributed across a larger area of chromatin.
All strains in this study were constructed in the YEF473A background (Bi and Pringle, 1996 ) unless otherwise noted. Most proteins were tagged with fluorescent proteins through homologous recombination at the C-terminus using PCR-amplified fragments (Joglekar et al., 2009 ). NUF2-GFP, Gal-NUF2, and Gal-H3 strains were constructed as previously described (Bouck and Bloom, 2005 , 2007 ; Anderson et al., 2009 ). Tagging with photoactivatable GFP was performed as previously described (Vorvis et al., 2008 ).
Yeast strains were grown in 2% glucose, 2% peptone, and 1% yeast extract (YPD) before imaging at 32°C for untreated wild-type and nocodazole-treated cells and 24°C for nps1-105 and isw2Δ strains (Table 1). Overnight cultures were diluted into fresh YPD media several hours before imaging and grown to early to mid logarithmic phase. Unsynchronized cells were washed and imaged on 2% glucose slab media. Nocodazole treatment to depolymerize microtubules was done by adding nocodazole to a final concentration of 20 μg/ml at 1 h before imaging. Gal-H3 cells were depleted of H3 as described (Bouck and Bloom, 2007 ). Growth in glucose media results in an approximately twofold reduction in nucleosome concentration. Gal-NUF2 strains were grown overnight in 2% galactose, 2% peptone, and 1% yeast extract (YPG) at 24°C to early to mid logarithmic phase. Approximately 1 h before imaging, cells were washed with water and resuspended in YPD at 24°C to repress NUF2 expression. We imaged large-budded cells with shorter spindles, representative of cells arrested due to activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (Bouck and Bloom, 2005 ).
Cells were imaged on a wide-field Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U or Nikon FN600 (Nikon, East Rutherford, NJ) microscope stand with a 100× Plan Apo, 1.4 numerical aperture, digital interference contrast oil immersion lens and an Orca ER Camera (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan). MetaMorph 6.1 (Molecular Devices, Downington, PA) was used to acquire 2 × 2 binned five-plane z-series stacks every 500 nm for FRAP experiments. For characterization of kinetochore organization, unbinned five-plane z-series stacks were acquired, and the brightest (most in-focus) plane was analyzed.
FRAP experiments were performed by acquiring a z-series in both the GFP and RFP channels before photobleaching. Throughout, a neutral density (ND4) filter was used to reduce photobleaching during photoacquisition. Proteins were photobleached with a single 50-ms pulse of 488-nm laser light focused on the image plane in a diffraction-limited spot. A five-plane z-series of the GFP channel was acquired immediately postbleach and every 20 s for 6 min. After the end of the GFP time lapse, a z-series of the RFP channel was taken to ensure that the cell did not enter anaphase.
The RFP spindle pole bodies were used to determine whether the cells were in metaphase (spindle length between 1.4 and 1.8 μm) and the position of the photobleached region. For nocodazole-treated cells we examined medium-budded cells with fully collapsed spindle pole bodies. To ensure that our analysis in the nps1-105 mutant is also of metaphase cells, we examined spindle pole (Spc29p-RFP) to kinetochore (Ame1p-GFP) distances in both wild-type and nps1-105 cells. On anaphase onset, the distance between the spindle pole and kinetochore is reduced. In wild-type cells this occurred when the spindle was ~1.9–2 μm, and similar values were observed in nps1-105 cells at permissive temperature (Supplemental Figure S3). Therefore we can use the same spindle length criteria (between 1.4 and 1.8 μm) to examine metaphase histone dynamics. Gal-NUF2 cells exhibited a metaphase arrest, so we examined only cells with medium buds, spindles <1.8 μm, and wild-type, roughly circular histone signal (corresponding to preanaphase nuclear shape).
Postacquisition, maximum-projection images were compiled from each z-series at each time point. A 5 × 5 pixel square was drawn over the photobleached region and copied to the RFP image of the spindle pole bodies. The pericentromere was defined by a rectangle corresponding to the region of cohesin enrichment, ~800 × 300 nm between the spindle pole bodies (Yeh et al., 2008 ). The 5 × 5 photobleached region was defined as pericentromeric if more than half of the pixels fell within the cohesin cylinder rectangle dimension (Figure 1).
To calculate t½ and percentage protein recovery, integrated intensity values were measured at each time point for a 5 × 5 region over the photobleached spot, an unbleached region in the same nucleus, the cell background, and an unbleached cell in the same field of view. These values were further analyzed using Excel (Microsoft, Richmond, WA). We corrected for photobleaching during acquisition by measuring the unbleached intensity over time. The FRAP rate constant (k) was calculated as follows: [Finf − F(t)]/[Finf − F(0)] = e−kt, where Finf is the average fluorescence intensity after maximum recovery, F(t) is the fluorescence intensity at each time point, F(0) is the fluorescence intensity at t = 0 s immediately postbleach, k is the rate constant for exponential decay, and t is time. The t½ was calculated as (ln 2)/k, and final percentage recovery equals [Finf − F(0)]/[Fpre − F(0)].
Samples with a negative percentage recovery were classified as displaying no measurable recovery. The number of samples exhibiting measurable recovery or not was compared with wild-type values by Fisher's exact test of statistical significance. Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test used to analyze contingency tables, similar to a chi-squared test, but it allows for smaller sample sizes. Of the cells displaying recovery, further statistical analysis was done using Excel. The upper and lower ranges were calculated as quartile 1 (Q1) – 1.5 × interquartile range (IQR) and Q3 + 1.5 × IQR. Values below or above these limits were defined as outliers. Mean averages and standard deviations of t½ and percentage recovery were calculated (summarized in Supplemental Tables S1 and S2). To determine whether data sets to be compared had statistically significantly different variances, we first performed an F test (p < 0.05). Subsequently, we performed two-tailed Student's t tests (type 2 or 3, depending on F test result) to determine whether the values were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Similar to the described FRAP technique, photoactivation experiments were performed by acquiring a z-series in both the GFP and RFP channels before photoactivation. A neutral density (ND4) filter was used to reduce photoactivation during photoacquisition. Proteins were photoactivated with one to three 800-ms pulses of 458/10-nm laser light. We also imaged these strains using 405-nm excitation light exciting the full field of view as a control. A z-series of the GFP channel was acquired immediately postbleach and every 15 s for 6 min. After the end of the GFP time lapse, a z-series of the RFP channel was taken to ensure that the cell did not enter anaphase. The RFP spindle pole bodies were used to determine whether the cells were in metaphase (spindle length between 1.4 and 1.8 μm) and the position of the photoactivated region.
For analysis, z-series stacks were compiled into maximum-projection images for each time point. The background intensity value was obtained from the prephotoactivation images. These are defined as the average intensity of a 20 × 20 pixel region plus three SDs. For each postphotoactivation frame, we determined the number of pixels in the region that were brighter than the background value. We then corrected for photoactivation during acquisition by subtracting the average intensity of a 20 × 20 pixel region in an unphotoactivated cell in the same field of view. The corrected number of pixels brighter than background was plotted over time. Proteins were characterized as dispersive or not dispersive based on the slope. Dispersive samples (such as the Erg6p control) exhibited negative slopes, suggesting the spot was getting dimmer over time. Nondispersive samples exhibited a positive slope. The number of samples exhibiting dispersion or not was compared with wild-type values by Fisher's exact test of statistical significance.
We thank the W. L. Lee laboratory for the photoactivatable GFP plasmid and ERG6-paGFP strain (Vorvis et al., 2008 ). We thank the T. Miyakawa laboratory for the nps1-105 temperature-sensitive strain (Tsuchiya et al., 1998 ). We thank Jim Haber and members of his lab (Brandeis University, Waltham, MA) and the Bloom lab for helpful discussions and suggestions, Lisa Bond for preliminary investigations into histone dynamics at the pericentromere, Marybeth Anderson for preliminary investigations regarding chromatin effects on kinetochore organization, and Colleen Hamm and Kaan Apaydin for work in imaging ISW2-GFP and NPS1-GFP. This work was funded by National Institutes of Health R37 Grant GM32238 (to K.B.).
This article was published online ahead of print in MBoC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E11-07-0651) on May 16, 2012.