PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jun 25, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3382079
NIHMSID: NIHMS359166
Pediatric HIV Type 1 Vaccine Trial Acceptability among Mothers in Kenya
Carey Farquhar,1,2 Grace C. John-Stewart,1,2 Francis N. John,3 Marjory N. Kabura,3 and James N. Kiarie3
1Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104
2Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
Address reprint requests to: Carey Farquhar, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359909 Seattle, Washington 98104, cfarq/at/u.washington.edu
Vaccination of infants against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) may prevent mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission. Successful trials and immunization efforts will depend on the willingness of individuals to participate in pediatric vaccine research and acceptance of infant HIV-1 vaccines. In a cross-sectional study, pregnant women presenting to a Nairobi antenatal clinic for routine care were interviewed regarding their attitudes toward participation in research studies and HIV-1 vaccine acceptability for their infants. Among 805 women, 782 (97%) reported they would vaccinate their infant against HIV-1 and 729 (91%) reported willingness to enroll their infant in a research study. However, only 644 (80%) would enroll their infants if HIV-1 testing was required every 3 months and 513 (64%) would agree to HIV-1 vaccine trial participation. Reasons for not wanting to enroll in a pediatric HIV-1 vaccine trial included concerns about side effects (75%), partner objection (34%), and fear of discrimination (10%), HIV-1 acquisition (8%), or false-positive HIV-1 results (5%). The strongest correlate of pediatric vaccine trial participation was maternal willingness to be a vaccine trial participant herself; in univariate and multivariate models this was associated with a 17-fold increased likelihood of participation (HR 17.1; 95% CI 11.7–25; p < 0.001). We conclude from these results that immunizing infants against HIV-1 and participation in pediatric vaccine trials are generally acceptable to women at high risk for HIV-1 infection. It will be important to address barriers identified in this study and to include male partners when mobilizing communities for pediatric HIV-1 vaccine trials and immunization programs.
Children In Sub-Saharan Africa and other regions with generalized human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) epidemics are at risk for acquiring HIV-1 through mother-to-child transmission.1 Vaccination of infants against HIV-1 may be one way to reduce HIV-1 acquisition or attenuate disease progression among children during the first years of life.25 The success of pediatric vaccine research and future HIV-1 immunization programs that target infants will depend in part on the willingness of parents to have their child participate in a clinical study and on parental acceptance of infant HIV-1 vaccines.
To our knowledge, no studies have examined attitudes toward infant vaccination against HIV-1. However, parental perceptions have been shown to be important predictors of uptake of infant immunizations against other common childhood illnesses. 69 Parents’ beliefs in the protective value and safety of vaccination significantly influence having an up-to-date immunization record for their child,6,8 while insufficient information has been cited as an important reason for not accepting newer vaccines.6 HIV-1 vaccine acceptability studies among adults also contribute to our understanding of what may influence parents’ decisions to accept HIV-1 immunization for their child once a vaccine is developed.1016 Several studies have found that health beliefs, such as low perceived susceptibility to HIV-1 and concerns about safety and efficacy, impact adult HIV-1 vaccine acceptance.
Additional data come from studies evaluating how willing parents would be to vaccinate adolescents and preadolescents against HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted infections (STI). Such studies have focused on sexual rather than vertical HIV-1 transmission risk and were carried out in the United States where the HIV-1 epidemic has been concentrated in high-risk groups, unlike in sub-Saharan Africa.1723 Not surprisingly, acceptance of HIV or STI vaccines was not universal with negative responses being associated with parents’ perceiving their child to be at low risk for HIV or STI, and positive responses being associated with vaccine efficacy, severity of the disease, and the absence of behavioral interventions to prevent specific infections.18,20
The goals of the current study were to define parental attitudes towards HIV-1 vaccines for infants and to determine willingness of parents to participate in pediatric HIV-1 research and vaccine trials. This is the first study to address HIV/AIDS vaccine acceptability among pregnant women and to work towards pediatric HIV-1 vaccine preparedness in an African setting within a population with high rates of vertical HIV-1 transmission. Such preparedness is essential if pediatric vaccines are to be developed, studied, promoted, and utilized in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the world where pediatric HIV-1 infection contributes disproportionately to childhood morbidity and mortality.
Enrollment and follow-up visits
This study was nested in a cohort study evaluating the suitability of pregnant and postpartum women for participation in HIV-1 prevention trials. Pregnant women attending a public antenatal clinic in Nairobi, Kenya provided written informed consent for study participation and were interviewed with a questionnaire by a study nurse or physician in Swahili or English, depending on the participant’s language preference. Those women agreeing to HIV-1 voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) were tested using parallel rapid HIV-1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and asked to return 2 weeks after enrollment for additional HIV-1 prevention counseling. Questions regarding attitudes and acceptability of pediatric research participation and immunization against HIV-1 were asked only at the enrollment visit prior to HIV-1 testing.
Statistical analysis
Independent t tests and Chi-squared tests were used to define associations between maternal factors and expressed willingness to participate in pediatric research or vaccinate their child against HIV-1 with a vaccine when available. Those factors that were statistically significant in univariate analyses (p ≤ 0.05) were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. If two or more factors were highly collinear, only one was incorporated into the final model.
Cohort characteristics
From December 2003 to April 2004, 805 pregnant women presenting to the antenatal clinic were enrolled into the study after providing written informed consent (Table 1). Among these, the median age was 23 years [interquartile range (IQR) 20–27] and 716 (79%) women were married, with 30 months (IQR 14–60) as the median duration of their current relationship. On average, the women had a history of two lifetime sexual partners (IQR 1–3) and two pregnancies (IQR 1–3) when including the current pregnancy (Table 1). Only 139 (17%) perceived themselves to be at risk for HIV-1 acquisition during the last 1 year. Five hundred eighty-five (72%) women accepted HIV-1 testing and 97 (17%) of these were HIV-1 seropositive.
Table 1
Table 1
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Cohort
Attitudes toward pediatric research and childhood immunization against HIV-1
Among the 805 women enrolled in the study, 782 (97%) responded that they would be willing to have their child vaccinated against HIV-1 if a safe, effective vaccine were available and 729 (91%) were willing to have their child participate in a research study. Of the 794 women with a regular sexual partner, 601 (76%) responded that study participation would require approval from their spouse or partner (Table 2). Overall, 488 (62%) believed their partner would support participation in pediatric research and 251 (32%) did not know how their partner would respond.
Table 2
Table 2
Attitudes of 805 Pregnant Women in Nairobi Toward Participation in Pediatric Research Studies and HIV Vaccination for Their Child
A lower proportion of these women was willing to have their child participate in a study requiring frequent HIV-1 testing or in a trial involving immunization of their child with an investigational HIV-1 vaccine (Table 2). Overall, 644 (80%) responded positively to research participation when study participation included HIV-1 testing every 3 months and 513 (64%) responded they would be willing to enroll their child in an HIV-1 vaccine trial. The majority of women did not provide an explanation for their unwillingness to participate in a research study that included HIV-1 testing every 3 months (Table 3). For the subset who did respond, reasons identified included time constraints [8 (8%)] and concerns about partner objections to study participation [7 (7%)]. Among the 240 women who did not want their child in an HIV-1 vaccine trial, 175 (79%) were concerned about side effects, 82 (34%) indicated that their partner would object to participation, 24 (10%) were concerned about discrimination, and 18 (8%) feared HIV-1 acquisition as a result of immunization (Table 3).
Table 3
Table 3
Reasons for Not Wanting to Participate in Pediatric HIV-1 Research or an HIV-1 Vaccine Trial or Receive an Immunization Against HIV-1
Correlates of willingness to participate in HIV-1 vaccine trials
Women stating that they were willing to be participants in HIV-1 research were more likely to respond that they would allow their child to be enrolled in a pediatric study or HIV-1 vaccine trial (Table 4). For HIV-1 vaccine trials, women who would participate were 17-fold more likely to report willingness to have their child participate in an HIV-1 vaccine trial [odds ratio (OR) 17.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.9–24.7, p < 0.001]. Additional correlates of participation in vaccine trials included younger age (p = 0.002), fewer years of formal education (p = 0.004), and earlier sexual debut (p = 0.003) (Table 4). Women who tested HIV-1 seropositive after the interview and those perceiving themselves at higher risk for HIV-1 acquisition were not more likely to agree to participation than women who were HIV-1 seronegative (p = 0.4 for both).
Table 4
Table 4
Correlates of Willingness to Participate in a Pediatric HIV-1 Vaccine Triala
Using a multivariate model to assess those correlates that were significantly associated in univariate analysis, we found a persistent association between the woman’s willingness to be a participant in an HIV-1 vaccine study and her interest in having her child participate (p < 0.001) (footnote to Table 4). Younger age was also found to be associated with willingness to enroll in a pediatric vaccine study (p = 0.01) (footnote to Table 4).
Overall, we found that the majority of pregnant women in this Nairobi-based study were willing to participate in research (>90%) and were receptive to having their child immunized with a safe and effective HIV-1 vaccine (>95%). A lower proportion of women was willing to have their child participate in studies requiring frequent blood draws for HIV-1 testing or in an HIV-1 vaccine trial (80% and 64%, respectively). The most frequently cited reason for not wanting to participate in a vaccine trial was fear of side effects, mentioned by approximately 80% of women. Other barriers included concerns about their male partner’s response, stigmatization, and fear of HIV-1 acquisition. Prior to initiating recruitment for pediatric vaccine studies, it will be important to address these specific concerns within the community through education and outreach efforts.
Our findings also suggest that special recruitment strategies may be required for pediatric HIV-1 vaccine studies. Thirty-four percent of women refusing to participate in a pediatric vaccine trial believed that their male partner would object and reported this as a primary reason. In addition, 76% of 750 women responding that they would participate in a research study believed they would need the prior approval of their spouse or partner. Approximately two-thirds of these women believed that their spouse would be in favor and the remaining one-third was uncertain of his response. As male partners were not interviewed in this study we were unable to assess their perspective. Additional studies exploring male attitudes toward participation in vaccine trials will be important to help clarify this. It will also be necessary to target men when launching community out-reach and educational programs directed at potential pediatric research participants. Using couple counseling to identify parents who are willing to participate in vaccine trials is another strategy that may work well. Couple counseling in the antenatal setting has been associated with increased uptake of interventions to prevent vertical as well as heterosexual transmission and may enhance recruitment and retention in clinical trials for HIV-1 vaccines.24
The most significant correlate for participation in pediatric studies was the woman’s willingness to be enrolled in research herself. This suggests that discussing pediatric study participation from the perspective of the parents may contribute to successful mobilization. In addition, identifying those parents willing to participate in research may be a useful strategy for recruitment into pediatric vaccine studies. Other correlates of participation in HIV-1 and vaccine studies were younger age and fewer years of education. One explanation for this is that younger, less educated individuals believe themselves to be at higher risk for HIV-1 acquisition and therefore their perception of the risk–benefit ratio is more favorable.
This cross-sectional study of pediatric vaccine acceptability and willingness to participate in vaccine research has its limitations. As noted earlier, men were not interviewed as part of this study and attitudes of male partners are likely to be important determinants of a woman’s willingness and ability to enroll her child in a vaccine study. In addition, participants were interviewed before learning their HIV-1 status, making it difficult to know whether women who knew they were HIV-1 seropositive and at risk for vertical HIV-1 transmission would have responded differently. It is possible they would have been more receptive toward participation in HIV-1 vaccine trials and infant vaccination against HIV-1. Finally, our study could not address whether behavior will change for women participating in pediatric HIV-1 vaccine trials. Specifically, will women choose to breastfeed over formula feed if their child participates in an HIV-1 vaccine trial, thus increasing risky behavior because they perceive a protective benefit from having their child vaccinated with a candidate vaccine? This concern has come up in HIV-1 vaccine studies among adults and will need to be further examined in mother–infant prevention studies.
In conclusion, as vaccine research continues, feasibility studies such as this one will help prepare for future pediatric vaccine studies in sub-Saharan Africa. Pediatric HIV-1 vaccine trials pose unique scientific, ethical, and logistical challenges,2 making it important to educate communities most affected by HIV-1 and to address specific concerns well before introducing an HIV-1 vaccine. Evaluating parental attitudes toward participation in research and particularly in vaccine trials may help to shape these educational efforts and may guide trial design and community preparation. Furthermore, while immunization campaigns against childhood illnesses have been successful in Kenya and other developing countries, there is no guarantee that availability of an HIV-1 vaccine will lead to widespread public acceptance. Many factors are likely to contribute and effectiveness of HIV vaccine programs will ultimately depend on the availability and willingness of individuals to accept vaccination.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
C. Farquhar receives support from NIH Grant K23 HD41879 and J. Kiarie, F. John, and M. Kabura were scholars in the AIDS International Training and Research Program supported by the NIH Fogarty International Center Grant D43 TW00007. G. John-Stewart is an Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (EGPAF) Scientist. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. This study received ethical approval from the institutional review boards of the University of Washington and the University of Nairobi and was conducted according to the guidelines set forth by the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
1. John-Stewart G, Mbori-Ngacha D, Ekpini R, et al. Breast-feeding and transmission of HIV-1. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(2):196–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Safrit JT. HIV vaccines in infants and children: Past trials, present plans and future perspectives. Curr Mol Med. 2003;3(3):303–312. [PubMed]
3. Safrit JT, Ruprecht R, Ferrantelli F, et al. Immunoprophylaxis to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(2):169–177. [PubMed]
4. Cunningham CK, Wara DW, Kang M, et al. Safety of 2 recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope vaccines in neonates born to HIV-1-infected women. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(5):801–807. [PubMed]
5. Johnson DC, McFarland EJ, Muresan P, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an HIV-1 recombinant canarypox vaccine in new-borns and infants of HIV-1-infected women. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(12):2129–2133. [PubMed]
6. Freeman VA, Freed GL. Parental knowledge, attitudes, and demand regarding a vaccine to prevent varicella. Am J Prevent Med. 1999;17(2):153–155. [PubMed]
7. Prislin R, Dyer JA, Blakely CH, Johnson CD. Immunization status and sociodemographic characteristics: The mediating role of beliefs, attitudes, and perceived control. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(12):1821–1826. [PubMed]
8. Wischnack LL, Jacobson RM, Poland GA, Jacobsen SJ, Harrison JM, Murtaugh PA. The surprisingly high acceptability of low-efficacy vaccines for otitis media: A survey of parents using hypothetical scenarios. Pediatrics. 1995;95(3):350–354. [PubMed]
9. Harrington PM, Woodman C, Shannon WF. Vaccine, yes, injection, no: Maternal responses to the introduction of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(448):901–902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Zimet GD, Mays RM, Winston Y, Kee R, Dickes J, Su L. Acceptability of human papillomavirus immunization. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9(1):47–50. [PubMed]
11. Zimet GD, Kee R, Winston Y, Perkins SM, Maharry K. Acceptance of hepatitis B vaccination among adult patients with sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(11):678–680. [PubMed]
12. Zimet GD, Fortenberry JD, Fife KH, Tyring SK, Herne K, Douglas JM. Acceptability of genital herpes immunization. The role of health beliefs and health behaviors. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24(10):555–560. [PubMed]
13. Liau A, Zimet GD, Fortenberry JD. Attitudes about human immunodeficiency virus immunization: The influence of health beliefs and vaccine characteristics. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25(2):76–81. [PubMed]
14. Gagnon MP, Godin G. Young adults and HIV vaccine: Determinants of the intention of getting immunized. Can J Public Health. 2000;91(6):432–434. [PubMed]
15. Baeten JM, Richardson BA, Martin HL, Jr, et al. Trends in HIV-1 incidence in a cohort of prostitutes in Kenya: Implications for HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;24(5):458–464. [PubMed]
16. Hom DL, Johnson JL, Mugyenyi P, et al. HIV-1 risk and vaccine acceptability in the Ugandan military. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1997;15(5):375–380. [PubMed]
17. Mays RM, Zimet GD. Recommending STI vaccination to parents of adolescents: The attitudes of nurse practitioners. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31(7):428–432. [PubMed]
18. Mays RM, Sturm LA, Zimet GD. Parental perspectives on vaccinating children against sexually transmitted infections. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(7):1405–1413. [PubMed]
19. McClure CA, Gray G, Rybczyk GK, Wright PF. Challenges to conducting HIV preventative vaccine trials with adolescents. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36(2):726–733. [PubMed]
20. Zimet GD, Mays RM, Sturm LA, Ravert AA, Perkins SM, Juliar BE. Parental attitudes about sexually transmitted infection vaccination for their adolescent children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(2):132–137. [PubMed]
21. Lazcano-Ponce E, Rivera L, Arillo-Santillan E, Salmeron J, Hernandez-Avila M, Munoz N. Acceptability of a human papillomavirus (HPV) trial vaccine among mothers of adolescents in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Arch Med Res. 2001;32(3):243–247. [PubMed]
22. Hinds A, Cameron JC. Acceptability of universal hepatitis B vaccination among school pupils and parents. Commun Dis Public Health. 2004;7(4):278–282. [PubMed]
23. Short MB, Rupp R, Stanberry LR, Rosenthal SL. Parental acceptance of adolescent vaccines within school-based health centres. Herpes. 2005;12(1):23–27. [PubMed]
24. Farquhar C, Kiarie JN, Richardson BA, et al. Antenatal couple counseling increases uptake of interventions to prevent HIV-1 transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;37(5):1620–1626. [PMC free article] [PubMed]