PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcpsycBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Psychiatry
 
BMC Psychiatry. 2012; 12: 36.
Published online Jun 20, 2012. doi:  10.1186/1471-244X-12-36
PMCID: PMC3379935
Development and psychometric properties the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) related to people with mental ill health
Sarah Clement,corresponding author1 Elaine Brohan,1 Debra Jeffery,1 Claire Henderson,1 Stephani L Hatch,2 and Graham Thornicroft1
1Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
2Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Sarah Clement: sarah.clement/at/kcl.ac.uk; Elaine Brohan: elaine.brohan/at/kcl.ac.uk; Debra Jeffery: debra.jeffery/at/kcl.ac.uk; Claire Henderson: claire.1.henderson/at/kcl.ac.uk; Stephani L Hatch: stephani.hatch/at/kcl.ac.uk; Graham Thornicroft: graham.thornicroft/at/kcl.ac.uk
Received October 26, 2011; Accepted April 30, 2012.
Abstract
Background
Many people with mental illness do not seek or delay seeking care. This study aimed to develop, and provide an initial validation of, a comprehensive measure for assessing barriers to access to mental health care including a ‘treatment stigma’ subscale, and to present preliminary evidence about the prevalence of barriers experienced by adults currently or recently using secondary mental health services in the UK.
Methods
The Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) was developed from items in existing scales, systematic item reduction, and feedback from an expert group. It was completed in an online survey by 117 individuals aged 18 and over who had received care from secondary mental health services in the past 12 months. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity (correlation of treatment stigma subscale with the Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help (SSRPH) and with the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI)), respondent opinion and readability were assessed.
Results
The BACE items were found to have acceptable test-retest reliability as all but one of the items exceeded the criterion for moderate agreement. The treatment stigma subscale had acceptable test-retest-reliability and good internal consistency. As hypothesised the subscale was significantly positively correlated with the SSRPH and the ISMI demonstrating convergent validity. The developmental process ensured content validity. Respondents gave the BACE a median rating of 8 on the 10-point quality scale. Readability scores indicated the measure can be understood by the average 11 to 12 year-old. The most highly endorsed barrier was ‘concern that it might harm my chances when applying for jobs’. The scale was finalised into a 30-item measure with a 12-item treatment stigma subscale.
Conclusions
There is preliminary evidence demonstrating the reliability, validity and acceptability of the BACE. It can be used to ascertain key barriers to access to mental health care which may help to identify potential interventions to increase care seeking and service use. Further research is needed to establish its factor analytic structure and population norms.
Keywords: Measure, Barriers to care, Access, Health care seeking, Stigma, Psychometric
Articles from BMC Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central