Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 June 18.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3376706

GABAergic inhibition sharpens the frequency tuning and enhances phase locking in chicken nucleus magnocellularis neurons


GABAergic modulation of activity in avian cochlear nucleus neurons has been studied extensively in vitro. However, how this modulation actually influences processing in vivo is not known. We investigated responses of chicken nucleus magnocellularis (NM) neurons to sound while pharmacologically manipulating the inhibitory input from the superior olivary nucleus (SON). SON receives excitatory inputs from nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus laminaris (NL), and provides GABAergic inputs to NM, NA, NL, and putatively to the contralateral SON. Results from single unit extracellular recordings from 2–4 wks posthatch chickens show that firing rates of auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) increased monotonically with sound intensity, while that of NM neurons saturated or even decreased at moderate or loud sound levels. Blocking GABAergic input with local application of TTX into the SON induced an increase in firing rate of ipsilateral NM while that of the contralateral NM decreased at high sound levels. Moreover, local application of bicuculline to NM also increased the firing rate of NM neurons at high sound levels, reduced phase-locking, and broadened the frequency tuning properties of NM neurons. Following application of DNQX, clear evidence of inhibition was observed. Furthermore, the inhibition was tuned to a broader frequency range than the excitatory response areas. We conclude that GABAergic inhibition from SON has at least three physiological influences on the activity of NM neurons: it regulates the firing activity of NM units in a sound-level dependent manner; it improves phase selectivity; and it sharpens frequency tuning of NM neuronal responses.

Keywords: Superior olivary nucleus, Cochlear nucleus, Bicuculline, GABA, Auditory, In vivo


Sounds are encoded as a train of action potentials in auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) and various stimulus features are represented by these patterns of activity. In birds, ANFs bifurcate to innervate two cochlear nuclei, nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and nucleus angularis (NA), where further processing occurs. NM is specialized for transmission of phase information bilaterally to nucleus laminaris (NL), where the interaural phase differences (IPD) are first processed (Young and Rubel, 1983; Carr and Konishi, 1990; Overholt et al., 1992). NM is specialized both morphologically and physiologically. First, large ANF presynaptic terminals, called the end-bulbs of Held (Parks and Rubel, 1978; Whitehead and Morest, 1981; Jhaveri and Morest, 1982ac), are formed on somas of NM neurons and generate a large post-synaptic current that can minimize jitter in synaptic transmission (Brenowitz and Trussell, 2001b). Second, low voltage activated potassium channels are robustly expressed in the postsynaptic membrane, which decreases the membrane resistance and correspondingly shortens the membrane time constant (Reyes et al., 1994; Rathouz and Trussell, 1998). These and other specialized features of postsynaptic membrane and the morphological features of synaptic terminals are differentially expressed along tonotopic axis in the NM (Fukui and Ohmori, 2004).

The superior olivary nucleus (SON) is known to receive excitatory inputs from the ipsilateral NA, NL and is thought to receive inhibitory inputs from the contralateral SON. It sends GABAergic projections to the ipsilateral NM, NA, NL and contralateral SON (Lachica et al., 1994; Westerberg and Schwarz, 1995; Burger et al., 2005b), and constitutes a major source of GABAergic inputs to these targets. In brainstem slice experiments, the GABAergic activity decreases the membrane resistance of NM and NL neurons (Yang et al., 1999; Monsivais et al., 2000). Models propose SON functions to improve ITD processing in two primary ways: 1) equalizing the binaural cochlear nucleus activity (Burger et al., 2005b; Dasika et al., 2005), and 2) improving the phase sensitivity in NM by shortening the membrane time constant (Yang et al., 1999; Monsivais et al., 2000). Until now, it has been unclear how this unusual depolarizing GABAergic input actually functions in vivo, especially considering that it must overcome the very large excitatory currents generated by the secure endbulb synapses of ANF terminals in order to suppress activity (Brenowitz and Trussell, 2001a). We investigated the processing of auditory information in vivo to further understand the role of this inhibitory system on sound evoked activity in NM. Our results support three main conclusions regarding inhibitory function. First, SON regulates the firing rate of NM at moderate and high sound pressure levels, stimulus conditions for which ANF inputs are expected to be depressed. Second, inhibition improves the phase selectivity of high frequency NM neurons. Finally, GABAergic input sharpens frequency tuning of NM neurons. These three related consequences of SON input have important implications for the computation of ITDs.


In vivo neuron recording and measurement

We used 128 young adult chickens aged 15 to 31 days (P15–31). Chickens were anesthetized using chloral hydrate (150 mg/kg) and urethane (1 g/kg) or, in some cases, only urethane (1 g/kg). Supplemental doses of urethane were administered, if the subjects showed any sign of discomfort. Animals were maintained at 40°C with a heating pad. Sound stimuli were presented through a pair of hollow ear bars with a closed acoustic system from a pair of earphones (EF-1935, Knowles Electronics). The sound pressure level was calibrated at the beginning of each experiment. All experiments were made in a sound-isolation booth placed within a soundproof, shielded room. The detailed surgical and physiological recording methods were previously described (Fukui et al., 2006) except as noted below. In experiments using the multi-barrel electrodes or the application of DNQX to the brainstem, the surface of NM was exposed by aspiration of the cerebellum leaving the cerebellar peduncle. Neural responses were recorded with custom-written data acquisition software (B. Warren, University of Washington, Seattle, WA) or software written in MATLAB (Fukui et al., 2006). After recordings, the brainstem was fixed by transcardiac perfusion with 10% formalin and sliced at 100 μm to document the electrode tracts. The source of 1,518 units recorded in NM was identified as either an ANF or a NM unit by the waveform of spike triggered average (STA) in response to white noise stimulus (Suppl. Fig. 1Bb; ANF, n = 628; NM, n = 844) and/or the latency to click stimuli (Suppl. Fig. 1A; ANF, n = 130; NM, n = 120). Supplemental Fig. 1Ba shows the example of the STA measurement. The zero crossing time (arrowheads) between the 2nd and the 3rd significant peaks was stable regardless of the sound level. This time value was used as one criterion to distinguish ANF from NM units. SON units were also confirmed by the electrode tract as well as the latency of STA and/or from the latency to the click stimulus (Suppl. Fig. 1C).

Quartz glass electrodes (#QF100-70-10, Sutter instrument) filled with 1 M sodium chloride were used for extracellular single unit recordings. After detection of single unit activity by white noise sound (90 dB), characteristic frequency (CF) was determined as previously described (Fukui et al., 2006). The firing rate-intensity function was measured with CF tones at randomized levels (from 10 to 90 dB SPL, 10 dB steps, Fig. 1A). The sound duration was 50 or 70 ms with a 3 ms rise and fall time for a sinusoidal envelope and the interstimulus interval was typically 500 ms. Firing rate was measured by counting spikes in a window from 3 ms after stimulus onset to the end of sound stimulus for more than 3 trials. The criterion for a threshold increase in spike rate was defined as the spontaneous firing rate plus 40 spikes/s (Warchol and Dallos, 1990). Maximal firing rate was defined as the maximal firing rate for the CF sound of 10–90 dB SPL. A depression index was computed as the ratio of the firing rate to a CF tone presented at 90 dB SPL to the maximal firing rate of the unit at any intensity. Therefore, a high depression index value (~1.0) indicates little or no spike suppression, while lower values indicate stronger spike suppression. Frequency tuning was determined by using a series of stimuli in which we varied frequency by 1/12 or 1/6 octave steps and intensity levels from below threshold to 90 dB SPL. Frequency selectivity was defined as the frequency range evoking above threshold firing rates at each intensity. Inhibitory frequency range was defined as the frequency range evoking firing rates falling two standard deviations below the spontaneous rate. The ratio of sensitive frequency (H/L) was defined as the ratio of the high end of the frequency range evoking a response divided by the lower limit of the frequency range at a given intensity. Vector strength (VS; Goldberg and Brown, 1969) was calculated from 15 ms after the sound onset to the end of sound stimulus (Fig. 56) as:

equation M1

where ai is the phase position of a single spike and N is the total number of spikes. The phase angle of the stimulussinusoid at which each spike occurs is expressed as a vectorof unit length. The vectors of all spikes are then averaged with the mean length indicating the vector strength. Thus, this measure equates to the relative abundance of firing at a particular phase angle. Vector strength varies from 0 (no phase-locking)to 1 (perfect phase-locking). Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = number of samples). Statistical analysis was performed by the unpaired or paired Student’s t-test or ANOVA. Removal of cerebellum did not affect the firing properties (spontaneous firing rate, maximal firing rate, threshold, depression ratio) of ANF and NM units (Suppl. Fig. 2, p > 0.45).

Figure 1
Difference in the rate-intensity relationship between ANF and NM
Figure 5
Phase sensitivity of NM response to sound with and without bicuculline
Figure 6
Wide band inhibition of NM activity is evident following DNQX application in NM

Application of TTX to SON

TTX was iontophoretically applied to SON using a glass electrode of about 40 μm tip diameter. SON was located by the evoked potential in response to a 50 ms white noise stimulus. The electrode was filled with ACSF containing 0.5 mM TTX, 1 mg/ml Alexa-568-conjugated 10 kDa dextran amine. TTX and the dye were injected by applying a large current (± 40 nA, 1 s positive and 1 s negative, 20 min). After the injection of TTX, the evoked potential response along the dorsal to ventral extent of the SON to white noise was almost completely suppressed. The injection site was confirmed by Alexa-568 following unit recordings (Suppl. Fig. 3). TTX was successfully injected into SON for 7 chickens (P17–24). Single unit recordings were made from 30 min to 5 hr after the injection of TTX.

Injection of bicuculline in NM

Multibarrel “piggyback” electrodes, composed of a single sharp electrode (borosilicate: AM SYSTEMS, Cat#602000, or quartz: (#QF100-70-10, Sutter instrument) glued to a three or five barrel pulled glass pipette (AM SYSTEMS, Cat#609000, or World Precision Instruments, 5B120F-4), were used for iontophoretic application of bicuculline methiodide to NM (Havey and Caspary, 1980). The tip of the multi-barrel electrode was broken to make the total tip diameter of about 25–40 μm and the sharp recording electrode was glued using cyanoacrylate glue and self-curing resin. The tip of the single sharp electrode protruded 20–30 μm from the tip of the multibarrel electrode. Internal solution of 1M NaCl was used for the single sharp electrode. Internal solution of 19.6 mM bicuculline in 154 mM NaCl at pH 3 and control solution (154 mM NaCl, pH 3) was used for the multibarrel electrode. The center barrel of the electrode was used as a current sink to balance the total injected current (154 mM NaCl, pH 7). A retention current (6 nA) was always applied during the insertion of electrode through the brainstem. The amplitude of the injected current ranged between −40 and −80 nA. The injection of control solution (154 mM NaCl, pH 3) had no effect on NM unit responses (n = 2, data not shown).

Application of DNQX onto the brainstem

Artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM: 120 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 17 glucose) or ACSF including 20 μM DNQX at 40°C) was continuously perfused on the surface of brainstem by a peristaltic pump (2–4 ml/min) in 10 chickens (P21–27). The peristaltic pump was also used to recover the ACSF solution. In order to stabilize the effects of drug, unit recordings were made after more than 30 min from the beginning of drug perfusion.


Firing properties of ANF and NM units and block of SON activity

Figure 1A shows the averaged rate-intensity function for ANF and NM units when a CF tone stimulus was applied. The spontaneous firing rate of NM units was significantly higher than for ANF units (NM, 101.9 ± 2.1 spikes/s, n = 413; ANF, 48.7 ± 2.1 spikes/s, n = 201, p < 0.0001). The spontaneous firing rate, the threshold sound level (NM, 31.34 ± 0.7 dB; ANF, 30.3 ± 1.0 dB) and maximal firing rate (NM, 260.9 ± 4.2 spikes/s; ANF, 370.0 ± 7.9 spikes/s) were comparable to those of previous reports (Warchol and Dallos, 1990; Salvi et al., 1992; Fukui et al., 2006). The firing rate of ANF units increased with the sound level and the rate-intensity relationship was monotonic in almost all units recorded. In contrast, the firing rate of NM units reached a maximum at an intermediate sound level and was slightly decreased or saturated at higher input levels (ANF). The depression index was defined as the firing rate at 90 dB SPL divided by the maximum firing rate of a unit. Thus low values indicate strong suppression. The depression index was lower than 0.95 in 72.7% of NM units, and only 6.7% of ANF units. Interestingly, although there was substantial variation in the depression index between units of similar CF, the depression index of NM units depended on the CF of units. Depression of spike rate was seen primarily in the middle to high CF NM units (Fig. 1B), in contrast to units with CFs < 1 kHz. Consistent with these findings, as described below, the influence of inhibition (or SON input) was most clearly observed in neurons with CFs above 1kHz. Furthermore, there was a weak, but significant relationship between threshold and firing rate depression at high sound levels; units having low acoustic thresholds tended to have low depression indexes (larger depression; Fig. 1C).

To test the influence of the SON in NM, the activity of the SON was blocked by local iontophoretic injection of 0.5mM TTX leaving the contralateral SON intact (Suppl. Fig. 3) and the responses of NM neurons were tested for 7 chickens. The depression of the NM units ipsilateral to the TTX inactivated SON was reduced compared to that seen in control NM neurons and, particularly, that observed in contralateral NM units (Fig. 2A). The effect of inactivating the SON input was only apparent at high intensities (> approximately 60 dB) and was much more dramatic for neurons with high frequency CFs than low CF units. Moreover, the depression of the ipsilateral NM after the TTX injection to SON was significantly smaller than that of the control, while that of the contralateral NM after the TTX injection was larger than that of the control for units with CFs above 1 kHz (Fig. 2B). ANOVA followed by individual comparisons revealed no significant differences for units with CFs < 1 kHz. For units with CFs ≥ 1 kHz, depression at high stimulus levels was significantly less on the ipsilateral side than controls (p < 0.05) and reliably greater on the contralateral side than controls (p < 0.001). Similarly, the difference between the average depression index ipsilateral and contralateral to the TTX blockade of SON activity was highly significant (p < 0.001). This difference between ipsilateral and contralateral depression index was not due to differences in CF distribution for the two populations of neurons. The means and SDs did not differ significantly [< 1 kHz: ipsilateral CF = 767.2 ± 48.7 Hz (n = 13); contralateral CF = 616.5 ± 81.7 Hz (n = 7). ≥ 1 kHz: ipsilateral CF = 1745.0 ± 129.7 Hz (n = 27); contralateral CF = 1619.3 ± 192.9 Hz (n = 8)].

Figure 2
Blocking SON activity by TTX altered the degree of depression for NM neurons

There was no significant difference in the spontaneous rate in NM (ipsilateral 127 ± 4.7 spikes/s, n = 40; contralateral 131.7 ± 9.3 spikes/s, n = 15; p = 0.62) or the threshold sound level (ipsilateral 20.0 ± 1.2 dB, n = 40; contralateral 20.3 ± 2.7 dB, n = 15; p = 0.91). However, the NM spontaneous rates were higher for the TTX treated population than for the control data reported in Fig. 1 (control 103.2 ± 2.3 spikes/s, n = 346; TTX 128.3 ± 9.3, n = 55, p < 0.01). The maximal firing rate was not significantly different between three groups for CFs < 1 kHz (control, ipsilateral, contralateral; ANOVA, p = 0.13). For CFs ≥ 1 kHz, the mean maximum rate of ipsilateral TTX treated NM neurons (347.8 ± 10.3 spikes/s, n = 27) was significantly higher than control (274.6 ± 3.7 spikes/s, n = 304, p < 0.001), but that of contralateral TTX treated was not (319.2 ± 22.6 spikes/s, n = 8). ANF activity was not significantly influenced by TTX injection into SON; spontaneous rate (control 43.5 ± 39.4 spikes/s, n = 31, +TTX 36.8 ± 18.0 spikes/s, n = 7, p = 0.66); rate at 90 dB SPL (control 356.0 ± 98.6 spikes/s, n = 31, +TTX 427.8 ± 84.5 spikes/s, n = 7, p = 0.08).

Bicuculline facilitated the firing activity of NM units

SON is known to make a GABAergic projection to NM. We further evaluated the effects of GABAergic inhibition by locally blocking GABAA receptors in NM with the iontophoretic application of bicuculline using a multibarrel piggy-back electrode while recording from NM neurons. Firing rates before, during, and after the application of bicuculline were measured. It should be stressed that this manipulation did not evaluate possible contributions of GABAB receptors to the firing properties of NM neurons, and it is known that GABAB receptors are found both pre-and postsynaptically in NM (Burger et al., 2005a). The results of blocking GABAA receptors for a typical neuron are shown in Figure 3. For this neuron, following 1–4 min of bicuculline iontophoresis (−60 nA), the firing rate in response to a 90 dB CF tone gradually increased, and saturated within 6 min of bicuculline application (Fig. 3A). Again, the increase in the firing rate was observed only for stimuli above about 60 dB SPL, and was not effective at either moderate (50 dB SPL) or subthreshold (10 dB) levels (Fig. 3A, b in 3B). After 2–4 min from the suspension of bicuculline application, the firing rate at 90 dB SPL decreased to the control rate, and no decrease was observed at 10 or 50 dB SPL (Fig. 3A). The complete rate-intensity function was similar to the control after 6–10 min of recovery from bicuculline application (c in Fig. 3B). In 24 NM neurons tested, a significant increase of the firing rate was observed at sound levels higher than 60 dB SPL and the mean firing rate at 90 dB SPL was increased 1.38 ± 0.04 times (Fig. 3C, Da), while the spontaneous firing rate was not significantly changed (p = 0.73, Fig. 3C). Iontophoretic application of the pH adjusted isotonic vehicle solution (154 mM NaCl, pH 3.0) had no significant effect on the firing activity (n = 2, data not shown). The largest increases in the firing rate following bicuculline application were found in units with the lowest depression index values in the control (p < 0.001; Fig. 3Db). The firing rate of ANF units was not affected by the application of bicuculline (n = 2, data not shown). Despite the large changes in firing rate at high sound levels, the overall firing pattern was only marginally changed.

Figure 3
Bicuculline-induced increase in NM neuron firing rate was level-dependent

Figure 4 shows one example of the PSTH in the control (Aa) and during the application of bicuculline (Ab), and the averaged difference of firing rate (B). After application of bicuculline, the firing rate increased during the entire 80 ms CF tone stimulus with the exception of the onset response (Fig. 4, vertical dotted line). In this example, the increase became significant starting at around 8 ms following stimulus onset and continued to be statistically significant until offset of the response to sound (Fig. 4B). The averaged increase in firing rate between 10–80 ms was 54.9 ± 8.4 spikes/s to this 90 dB SPL CF stimulus. That corresponds to a 44.2% above the firing rate of prior to the bicuculline treatment (124.3 ± 9.9 spikes/s, n = 24). Figures 4C and 4D show average firing rates for the early portion of the PSTH and sustained response portion, respectively, as a function of stimulus level for the control condition and with bicuculline treatment. It is clear that the bicuculline treatment dramatically enhances responses to high intensity stimuli during the sustained response, but has little or no effect during the onset response. While PSTH analyses show little change in the overall pattern of response, analyses of the temporal precision in responses to tone stimuli was dependent on GABAergic input. Vector strength (VS) is a measure of the degree of phase selectivity of a response (Goldberg and Brown, 1969). Figure 5A shows one example of period histograms of spikes in under control conditions and during bicuculline treatment. Phase-locking was observed in the control with a VS of 0.46. During bicuculline application the period histogram broadened and the VS fell to 0.33, while the firing rate increased to 1.55 times the control at 90 dB SPL. Ratios of VS measured at 90 dB SPL in each condition are plotted in Fig. 5B. The averaged ratio of VS at 90 dB SPL was 0.92 ± 0.02 for all units studied in both conditions (n = 24, p < 0.001). Again, the decrease in VS was more striking for higher CF units (r = −0.47, p < 0.05). VS decreases were also level-dependent, a priori comparisons were made between control and bicuculline condition at each intensity. At 70, 80 and 90 dB stimulus levels the difference was significant (p < 0.05). At lower intensities, the small differences in VS ratios were not reliable (Fig. 5C).

Figure 4
Time course of the bicuculline sensitive response

Inhibitory tuning curve in NM

The acoustically evoked inhibition in NM, demonstrated by suppressing the excitatory synaptic input from ANFs, was frequency dependent (Fig. 6). We applied 20 μM DNQX onto the surface of the brainstem to partially block AMPA receptors in NM from activation by ANFs. The spontaneous firing rate of NM units was slightly lower in the presence of DNQX than in control conditions (in DNQX, 97.5 ± 4.2 spikes/s, n = 58; in controls, 116.5 ± 6.2 spikes/s, n = 49, p < 0.05), while the spontaneous firing rates of ANF units was not significantly different (in DNQX, 52.6 ± 3.6 spikes/s, n = 41; in control, 49.7 ± 4.7 spikes/s, n = 35). After the application of DNQX, the auditory evoked discharges in NM units nearly ceased, only occurring at the onset of the sound stimulus for most neurons (Fig. 6Aa). Surprisingly, the ongoing firing rate for remainder of the duration of the tone decreased below the spontaneous level. The onset responses enabled us to identify NM units and characterize their frequency selectivity. The zero crossing time and latency in spike triggered averaging (STA, Suppl. Fig. 1B) of the click response corresponded to that of untreated NM units (Suppl. Fig. 1A).

The excitatory and inhibitory response tuning was assessed for each NM unit in two time windows with respect to the stimulus. The excitatory onset responses were assessed in a window including the initial 15 ms while the inhibitory response area was measured from the area of response suppression in the remaining 15–80 ms period (see Methods). The excitatory response exhibited a relatively narrow tuning range at 90 dB SPL (Fig. 6Ab, the frequency range above the threshold level was 1.32–2.07 kHz) when compared to the inhibitory tuning range (Fig. 5Ab, the frequency range below the inhibitory threshold level was 0.45–3.75 kHz). Figure 6Ba shows one example of the tuning curve for the excitation measured from the onset response and the tuning curve of the inhibition measured from the ongoing response. The tuning curve of the excitatory onset response was sharp. Figure 6Bb shows another example of the inhibitory tuning curve in the unit for which the onset excitatory response was not detectable. The tuning curve of the inhibitory response was again very broad (Fig. 6Bb) and overlapped with that of the excitatory response at loud sound levels (Fig. 6Ba). The W-shape of inhibitory tuning curve in Fig. 6Ba is likely due to the remaining excitatory response that canceled the inhibition during the sound stimulus.

The frequency ranges of the excitation and the inhibition are compared in Fig. 7A for DNQX treated NM neurons (n = 30). For most units (24 out of 30 units) the frequency range of the inhibition extended well beyond the frequency range of the excitation. In 3 out of 30 neurons the frequency range of the excitation could not be detected with the DNQX treatment. While a small onset response was detectable, it did not achieve our criterion for threshold across a range of frequencies. In contrast, evoked inhibition suppressed spontaneous activity in these neurons (top 3 units in Fig. 7A) across a broad range of frequencies. In two units (indicated by closed arrowheads in Fig. 7A), the inhibition extended only to the high frequency side, and in one unit (indicated by grey arrowhead in Fig. 7A) the inhibition extended only to the low frequency side.

Figure 7
Inhibitory tuning curves are broader than excitatory tuning curves in NM neurons

Tuning width was assessed for units using the sensitive frequency ratio (H/L), defined as the ratio of the high frequency limit of the response range divided by the low frequency limit. Population mean H/L ratios for ANF, NM, as well as the excitatory and inhibitory response areas for NM units treated with DNQX are shown in Fig. 7B. ANF, NM, showed sharp frequency tuning. DNQX treated NM units (NM-exc in Fig. 7B) also showed sharp excitatory tuning, but the inhibitory area (NM-inh in Fig. 7B) was strikingly broader. H/L ratios for all four conditions were significantly different from each other (ANF 2.9 ± 0.2; NM 2.4 ± 0.1; NM-Exc. 1.8 ± 0.1; NM-Inh 9.7 ± 1.3). The broad tuning of the inhibitory response area was similar in scale to the excitatory tuning curves observed in recordings of individual SON units (data not shown).

The H/L of NM units was also CF dependent and had a tendency to be smaller than that of ANF units for CFs >1 kHz (Fig. 7B). The range of sensitive frequencies, defined by the maximum and minimum frequencies evoking superthreshold responses at any intensity, was compared between the control and bicuculline conditions for a group of NM units. Figure 8A shows one typical example. The range of sensitive frequency (bounded by two arrows) became broader by bicuculline. For almost all 11 NM units studied in this way, the H/L ratio became larger after the application of bicuculline (Fig. 8B). The average of H/L was 1.8 ± 0.3 in control and 2.5 ± 0.5 in the bicuculline (n = 11). Bicuculline broadened the H/L by 1.4 ± 0.2 (p < 0.05). The average of the lower and higher bound was 1154 ± 185 Hz and 1653 ± 127 Hz for the control, 1031 ± 172 Hz and 1958 ± 112 Hz for the bicuculline conditions. Both side of the bounds was significantly modified by the application of bicuculline (p < 0.01 for lower bound, p < 0.05 for higher bound). Thus, taken together with data from Figure 7B the tuning of excitation in NM while GABAergic input is blocked was much narrower than the tuning of inhibitory input while excitation was blocked.

Figure 8
Bicuculline sensitive current sharpened the frequency response


In this report, we evaluated the contribution of GABAergic input from the SON to processing of acoustic features in NM. We revealed at least three physiologically significant roles of GABAergic input to the NM in vivo. First, SON controls the firing rate of NM in a sound-level dependent manner (Figs. 13). Second, the inhibition improves phase responsiveness in NM (Fig. 5). The improvement of the VS was more significant in high CF units (Fig. 5B) and was significant only at the more intense sound levels (Fig. 5C). Third, the inhibition sharpens frequency tuning at NM (Fig. 8). In each case, the influence of GABAergic input was most prominent for cells responsive to higher frequencies (> 1 kHz) and for high or relatively high intensity stimuli.

Degree of the inhibition in NM

The synaptic projection from SON to NM is known to be GABAergic (Lachica et al., 1994). The intracellular chloride concentration is elevated in mature NM neurons and the reversal potential of GABAergic IPSP is between −25 mV and −37 mV (Lu and Trussell, 2001; Monsivais and Rubel, 2001). As a result GABAergic input depolarizes the membrane of NM neurons, yet the net effect of GABAergic input remains strongly inhibitory via two mechanisms. First, the depolarization reduces the membrane resistance by the activation of low voltage activated potassium channels and second, the kinetically slow depolarization causes threshold accommodation (Yang et al., 1999; Monsivais et al., 2000; Howard et al., 2007; Howard and Rubel, 2010). Our results are consistent with the above results from in vitro studies, showing that GABA indeed inhibits acoustically driven NM activity in vivo.

The excitatory input to NM has been well characterized by in vitro studies as well. The ANF terminals form large end bulb of Held synapses on NM neurons that individually generate very large synaptic currents sufficient to evoke an action potential in NM neurons in vitro (Parks and Rubel, 1978; Jhavari and Morest, 1982ac; Carr and Boudreau, 1991). However, at high firing rates the ANF to NM synapse undergoes dramatic depression such that current amplitudes are reduced by more than 80% at >300 Hz, even over brief input trains (Brenowitz and Trussell, 2001a). In this report, we demonstrate that acoustically evoked GABAergic input is sufficient to suppress excitatory tone responses of NM neurons in vivo. The inhibition was most efficacious during high intensity stimuli and in high CF neurons. Indeed, blocking inhibition did not alter the spontaneous firing rate of NM neurons nor did it influence the evoked spike rate to low sound intensities. The bias in inhibitory efficacy toward high CF neurons was surprising given that an earlier report showing stronger GABA immunoreactivity in the low CF region in NM (Code et al., 1989). It may be noteworthy, however, that the quantitative analyses in this study utilized ICC with a polyclonal antibody raised against GABA-gluteraldehyde conjugate. A later study by our group revealed significant differences in the patterns of labeling seen in NM with this antibody and an antibody to GAD-2, although the tonotopic gradient was not directly studied with the GAD-2 antibody (Code et al., 1990), and a subsequent study of the barn owl auditory pathways did not reveal a tonotopic gradient through NM (Carr et al., 1989). In addition, a qualitative review of tissue immunostained with modern antibodies against gephryn, an intracellular marker for GABAA and glycine receptors, as well as GAD-65 failed to confirm the observations made in Code et al. (1989; EWR, unpublished observations). Hence, the tonotopic gradient that was clearly observed in this early study, may not have been specific to GABA per se, and this issue needs to be revisited by a combination of modern cell biological and physiological methods.

The dependence on CF and intensity may be due to a number of factors that control synaptic input magnitude and NM neuron excitability such as, synaptic depression (Brenowitz and Trussell 2001a, b), and tonotopic variation in voltage gated potassium channels (Fukui and Ohmori, 2004). These potassium channels are known to act cooperatively with GABAergic input to suppress spiking in these cells (Howard et al., 2007; Monsivais et al., 2000). Additionally, the number of ANF terminals impinging on NM neurons systematically decreases with CF (Fukui and Ohmori, 2004). Interestingly, the GABAergic inhibition fails to suppress responses to the putatively stronger excitatory synaptic inputs occurring at stimulus onset, when input from the SON may be relatively weak or delayed. Similar GABA dependent spike suppression has been observed in primary-like anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons in mammals (Caspary et al. 1994; Gai and Carney, 2008; Kopp-Scheinpflug et al. 2002).

In addition to CF and sound intensity, the GABAergic modulation of the NM neurons depended on depression index values. Among neurons of similar CF, there was a large variation of depression values (Fig. 1B). This variation depends, at least in part, on the degree of inhibitory input across the population of NM neurons (Fig. 3Db); the firing rate of more depressed units tended to increase with bicuculline application. In addition, there was a weak, but reliable relationship between threshold and depression (Fig. 1C); low threshold units tend to show higher depression indexes. These two, related, results probably account for the fact that the grand average of the firing rate was relatively flat at sound levels higher than 50 dB SPL (Fig. 1A), while the averaged depression index was 0.8 (Fig. 2B). Warchol and Dallos (1990) also report wide variation in threshold, saturation levels and degree of depression among NM units.

Physiological significance of SON

Inhibitory input provided by SON has emerged as a crucial component of sound localization circuitry in birds. First, Nishino et al., (2008) demonstrated that SON enhances the peak-trough contrast of ITD tuning especially in low CF NL cells. SON also appears to influence the excitatory input to NL in several important ways.

In addition to the modulation of the ipsilateral NM as a function of intensity and CF, we show that the SON activity differentially modulates NM firing rates bilaterally, putatively via it’s GABAergic synaptic connectivity to the contralateral SON (Monsevais et al., 2000; Burger et al., 2005b). The physiological role of the mutual connectivity of the SONs has been proposed to equalize the binaural firing rate differences between each NM (Burger et al., 2005b, Dasika et al., 2005). Durlach and colleagues first proposed the computational advantage of equalization of input magnitude for coincidence detection in the 1970s (Colburn and Durlach, 1978). The complimentary models proposed by Burger et al. (2005b) and Dasika et al. (2005) predicted that the SON to SON projection is itself inhibitory, and that higher activity in one SON would proportionally relieve the inhibitory feedback to the cochlear nucleus by suppressing activity in the contralateral SON. This hypothesis is supported by the demonstration that during TTX application to the SON, the firing rate of ipsilateral NM was facilitated while the contralateral NM was depressed. These findings suggest that the reciprocal connectivity between the SONs is: 1) mutually inhibitory; and 2) functions to balance the magnitude of excitation to binaural coincidence detectors in NL. They further suggest that the SON contains a population of neurons that are driven by the ipsilateral ear and suppressed by the contralateral ear much like interaural level difference (ILD) processing neurons in the mammalian lateral superior olive (LSO) or in the avian dorsal lateral lemniscal nucleus (LLDp). LLDp encodes ILD by processing excitatory synaptic input from the ipsilateral NA and inhibition from contralateral LLDp (Manley et al., 1988; Konishi, 2003). Recently, work from our laboratories has reported ILD selective neurons are also found in the chicken SON (Coleman et al., 2010) and LLDp (Sato et al., 2010).

NM’s bilateral output projects exclusively to NL, where coincidence-detecting neurons compute ITDs for sound localization, an essential feature of binaural hearing. Thus, NM’s principal function is to provide accurate temporal information to NL neurons in the form of phase-locked discharges. The improvement of the phase-locking by shortening the membrane time constant was predicted from in vitro studies (Yang et al., 1999; Monsivais et al., 2000). We show that GABAergic input does indeed improve phase-locking in NM especially in the high CF neurons.

Finally, DNQX application directly to NM revealed inhibitory input that was more broadly tuned than the excitatory response area, suggesting that inhibition may suppress responses at and beyond the boarders of an NM units frequency range, particularly at high sound levels. Enhancement of frequency contrast among inputs to NL through this mechanism might be particularly important under conditions of high background noise. Maintaining the frequency selectivity of each NM unit by SON would be advantageous for the processing of ITDs by reducing noisy, out-of-phase input from neurons phase-locked to multiple sound frequencies.

In summary, localization of low frequency sounds depends on elaborate circuitry that has evolved in birds and mammals for the precise computation of ITDs. This circuitry involves an elegant and highly specialized excitatory network known to preserve temporal information (reviewed in: Trussell, 1997; Oertel, 1997). In addition, a large body of in vitro physiological and anatomical research over the past 20 years has led to important predictions about the functional significance of the inhibitory elements in this circuitry (reviewed in: Grothe, 2003; Burger and Rubel, 2007). This report addresses several predictions made by these previous. GABAergic inhibition influences the rate, timing, and frequency tuning of NM neurons. In each case, this influence is predicted to result in improved temporal information provided by NM input neurons to coincidence detecting neurons in NL. Thus, the inhibitory circuitry composed of the two coupled inhibitory feedback loops via the SON nuclei in the avian auditory brainstem appears to be critically important for the accuracy and precision in the neural computation of sound location.

Supplementary Material



We appreciate Dr. Leonard M. Kitzes, two anonymous reviewers and the editor for valuable comments and suggestions. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (20700349 to IF and 20220008 to HO), Grant-in-Aid for Fujiwara Memorial Foundation to IF, NIH/NIDCD grants DC00466 to RMB, DC003829 and DC04661 to EWR.


artificial cerebrospinal fluid
auditory nerve fiber
characteristic frequency
gamma-aminobutyric acid
interaural level difference
interaural phase difference
nucleus angularis
nucleus magnocellularis
superior olivary nucleus
vector strength


  • Brenowitz S, Trussell LO. Maturation of synaptic transmission at end-bulb synapses of the cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci. 2001a;21:9487–9498. [PubMed]
  • Brenowitz S, Trussell LO. Minimizing synaptic depression by control of release probability. J Neurosci. 2001b;21:1857–1867. [PubMed]
  • Burger RM, Pfeiffer JD, Westrum LE, Bernard A, Rubel EW. Expression of GABA(B) receptor in the avian auditory brainstem: ontogeny, afferent deprivation, and ultrastructure. J Comp Neurol. 2005a;489:11–22. [PubMed]
  • Burger RM, Cramer KS, Pfeiffer JD, Rubel EW. Avian superior olivary nucleus provides divergent inhibitory input to parallel auditory pathways. J Comp Neurol. 2005b;481:6–18. [PubMed]
  • Burger RM, Rubel EW. Encoding of interaural timing for binaural hearing. In: Dallos P, Oertel D, editors. The senses a comprehensive reference. Vol. 3. Elsevier; Oxford: 2007. pp. 613–630.
  • Caspary DM, Backoff PM, Finlayson PG, Palombi PS. Inhibitory inputs modulate discharge rate within receptive fields of anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72:2124–2233. [PubMed]
  • Carr CE, Boudreau RE. Central projections of auditory nerve fibers in the barn owl. J Comp Neurol. 1991;314:306–318. [PubMed]
  • Carr CE, Fujita I, Konishi M. Distribution of GABAergic neurons and terminals in the auditory system of the barn owl. J Comp Neurol. 1989;286:190–207. [PubMed]
  • Carr CE, Konishi M. A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl. J Neurosci. 1990;10:3227–3246. [PubMed]
  • Code RA, Burd GD, Rubel EW. Development of GABA immunoreactivity in brainstem auditory nuclei of the chick: ontogeny of gradients in terminal staining. J Comp Neurol. 1989;284:504–518. [PubMed]
  • Code RA, Durham D, Rubel EW. Effects of cochlea removal on GABAergic terminals in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken. J Comp Neurol. 1990;301:643–654. [PubMed]
  • Colburn HS, Durlach NI. Models of binaural interaction. In: Carterette EC, Friedman M, editors. Handbook of Perception. New York: Academic Press; 1978. pp. 467–518.
  • Coleman WL, Fischl MJ, Trause DA, Burger RM. Physiological heterogeneity of in the avian Superior Olivary Nucleus. Abstracts of the thirty-third annual midwinter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; Anaheim, CA. 2010.
  • Dasika VK, White JA, Carney LH, Colburn HS. Effects of inhibitory feedback in a network model of avian brain stem. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:400–414. [PubMed]
  • Fukui I, Ohmori H. Tonotopic gradients of membrane and synaptic properties for neurons of the chicken nucleus magnocellularis. J Neurosci. 2004;24:7514–7523. [PubMed]
  • Fukui I, Sato T, Ohmori H. Improvement of phase information at low sound frequency in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:633–641. [PubMed]
  • Gai Y, Carney LH. Influence of inhibitory inputs on rate and timing of responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 2008;99:1077–1095. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goldberg JM, Brown PH. Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol. 1969;32:613–636. [PubMed]
  • Grothe B. New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:540–550. [PubMed]
  • Havey DC, Caspary DM. A simple technique for constructing ‘piggy-back’ multibarrel microelectrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980;48:249–251. [PubMed]
  • Howard MA, Burger RM, Rubel EW. A developmental switch to GABAergic inhibition dependent on increases in Kv1-type K+ currents. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2112–2123. [PubMed]
  • Howard MA, Rubel EW. Dynamic spike thresholds during synaptic integration preserve and enhance temporal response properties in the avian cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci. 2010 In press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jhaveri S, Morest DK. Neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken auditory system with observations on nucleus laminaris: a light and electron microscope study. Neuroscience. 1982a;7:809–836. [PubMed]
  • Jhaveri S, Morest DK. Sequential alterations of neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the developing chicken: a golgi study. Neuroscience. 1982b;7:837–853. [PubMed]
  • Jhaveri S, Morest DK. Sequential alterations of neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the developing chicken: an electron microscope study. Neuroscience. 1982c;7:855–870. [PubMed]
  • Konishi M. Coding of auditory space. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:31–55. [PubMed]
  • Kopp-Scheinpflug C, Dehmel S, Dörrscheidt GJ, Rübsamen R. Interaction of excitation and inhibition in anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons that receive large endbulb synaptic endings. J Neurosci. 2002;22:11004–11018. [PubMed]
  • Lachica EA, Rübsamen R, Rubel EW. GABAergic terminals in nucleus magnocellularis and laminaris originate from the superior olivary nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 1994;348:403–418. [PubMed]
  • Lu T, Trussell LO. Mixed excitatory and inhibitory GABA-mediated transmission in chick cochlear nucleus. J Physiol (Lond) 2001;535:125–131. [PubMed]
  • Manley GA, Köppl C, Konishi MA. A neural map of interaural intensity differences in the brain stem of the barn owl. J Neurosci. 1988;8:2665–2676. [PubMed]
  • Monsivais P, Yang L, Rubel EW. GABAergic inhibition in nucleus magnocellularis: implications for phase locking in the avian auditory brainstem. J Neurosci. 2000;20:2954–2963. [PubMed]
  • Monsivais P, Rubel EW. Accommodation enhances depolarizing inhibition in central neurons. J Neurosci. 2001;21:7823–7830. [PubMed]
  • Nishino E, Yamada R, Kuba H, Hioki H, Furuta T, Kaneko T, Ohmori H. Sound-intensity-dependent compensation for the small interaural time difference cue for sound source localization. J Neurosci. 2008;28:7153–7164. [PubMed]
  • Oertel D. Encoding of timing in the brain stem auditory nuclei of vertebrates. Neuron. 1997;19:959–962. [PubMed]
  • Overholt EM, Rubel EW, Hyson RL. A circuit for coding interaural time differences in the chick brainstem. J Neurosci. 1992;12:1698–1708. [PubMed]
  • Parks TN, Rubel EW. Organization and development of the brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: primary afferent projections. J Comp Neurol. 1978;180:439–448. [PubMed]
  • Rathouz M, Trussell L. Characterization of outward currents in neurons of the avian nucleus magnocellularis. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:2824–2835. [PubMed]
  • Reyes AD, Rubel EW, Spain WJ. Membrane properties underlying the firing of neurons in the avian cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci. 1994;14:5352–5364. [PubMed]
  • Salvi RJ, Saunders SS, Powers NL, Boettcher FA. Discharge patterns of cochlear ganglion neurons in the chicken. J Comp Physiol A. 1992;170:227–241. [PubMed]
  • Sato T, Fukui I, Ohmori H. Interaural phase difference modulates the neural activity in the nucleus angularis and improves the processing of level difference cue in the lateral lemniscal nucleus in the chicken. Neurosci Res. 2010;66:198–212. [PubMed]
  • Trussell LO. Cellular mechanisms for preservation of timin in central auditory pathways. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997;7:487–492. [PubMed]
  • Warchol ME, Dallos P. Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol A. 1990;166:721–734. [PubMed]
  • Westerberg BD, Schwarz DW. Connections of the superior olive in the chicken. J Otolaryngol. 1995;24:20–30. [PubMed]
  • Whitehead MC, Morest DK. Dual populations of efferent and afferent cochlear axons in the chicken. Neurosci. 1981;6:2351–2365. [PubMed]
  • Yang L, Monsivais P, Rubel EW. The superior olivary nucleus and its influence on nucleus laminaris: a source of inhibitory feedback for coincidence detection in the avian auditory brainstem. J Neurosci. 1999;19:2313–2325. [PubMed]
  • Young SR, Rubel EW. Frequency-specific projections of individual neurons in chick brainstem auditory nuclei. J Neurosci. 1983;3:1373–1378. [PubMed]