PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aacPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAAC ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 June; 56(6): 3465–3466.
PMCID: PMC3370747

Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Heidelberg from a Ground Turkey-Associated Outbreak in the United States in 2011

LETTER

Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg is the fifth-most-common serotype that causes human disease in the United States, and it appears to be more invasive than other nontyphoidal serotypes (3, 6). In March 2011, a multistate outbreak of Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg infections was investigated (2). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of isolates from suspected cases and an epidemiologic investigation identified 136 case patients from 34 states from February to September. Two closely related XbaI PFGE patterns were identified among the outbreak isolates. Additional information was available on 94 ill persons. Their ages ranged from <1 to 90 years of age, and the median age was 23. Thirty-nine percent of patients were hospitalized. One death was reported. A collaborative effort by national, state, and local agencies identified ground turkey as the source of infection. S. enterica serotype Heidelberg isolates matching the outbreak pattern were identified among ground turkey products from retail establishments, and these products originated from a common food production establishment (2).

Nineteen outbreak isolates from ill persons or retail meat samples were sent to the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) at Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). MICs were determined for amikacin, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, kanamycin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole by broth microdilution (Sensititre; Trek Diagnostics, Westlake, OH). Resistance was defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretive standards, when available (5). For streptomycin, where no CLSI interpretive criteria for human isolates exist, the resistance breakpoint is 64 mg/liter. All of the isolates were resistant to ampicillin, gentamicin, streptomycin, and tetracycline (5). Two isolates from Ohio, one clinical and one retail meat, with different XbaI PFGE patterns (JF6X01.0058 and JF6X01.0032) but the same BlnI pattern (JF6A26.0076) were analyzed for antimicrobial resistance genes by PCR and DNA sequencing. Both isolates were positive for blaTEM-1, aac(3)-IIa, aadA1, ant(3″)-Ia, and tetA genes (4). Plasmid DNA was electroporated into E. coli DH10B cells (7). PCR analysis and AST demonstrated the transfer of all five genes, confirming that they were plasmid encoded. PCR-based replicon typing identified the plasmid as type IncI1, a common poultry-associated plasmid type (1, 8). Plasmid PFGE confirmed plasmids of approximately 100 kb in size in both transformants, and plasmid multilocus sequence typing (pMLST) identified them as sequence type 26 (ST26) (10). Most ST26 plasmids submitted to the pMLST database are cephalosporin resistance plasmids in Escherichia coli strains isolated from porcine and human sources in Europe. Conjugation experiments demonstrated that both plasmids were transferred to E. coli J53 (sodium azide-resistant) cells with high efficiency (2.8 × 10−1 and 9.0 × 10−2), similar to IncI1 plasmids from other studies (9, 12).

Both the number of cases and the percentage of hospitalizations (39%, compared to an average of 26.2% for outbreaks of Heidelberg infections) have raised questions concerning whether the severity of this outbreak was due to pathogen dose or if this multidrug-resistant outbreak “strain” was novel (11). While theses isolates do not match previously studied Heidelberg isolates in our laboratory by PFGE, resistance gene content, and plasmid type, NARMS has identified several isolates from past routine surveillance of isolates from ground turkey, turkey, and human clinical samples that match the observed characteristics, including XbaI PFGE pattern, AST pattern, and plasmid characteristics (AR genes, Inc type, ST, and size) (7, 13).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the NARMS-participating public health laboratories for submitting the isolates, Anne Whitney for DNA sequencing, A. Carattoli for the plasmid incompatibility typing control strains, and G. Jacoby for the conjugation recipient strain.

This work was partially supported by an interagency agreement between CDC and the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC, FDA, or USDA.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 26 March 2012

Contributor Information

J. Taylor, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

S. Zhao, Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, Maryland, USA.

P. J. Fedorka-Cray, Bacterial Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Athens, Georgia, USA.

J. Whichard, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

P. McDermott, Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, Maryland, USA.

REFERENCES

1. Carattoli A, et al. 2005. Identification of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J. Microbiol. Methods 63:219–228 [PubMed]
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011. Multistate outbreak of human Salmonella Heidelberg infections linked to ground turkey. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/index.html
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2009. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) for enteric bacteria: enteric bacteria annual report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: http://www.cdc.gov/narms/pdf/2009AnnualReportNARMS508.pdf
4. Chen S, et al. 2004. Characterization of multiple-antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella serovars isolated from retail meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1–7 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. CLSI 2011. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 21st informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S21. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA
6. Crump JA, et al. 2011. Antimicrobial resistance among invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica isolates in the United States: National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 1996 to 2007. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:1148–1154 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Folster JP, et al. 2010. Characterization of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg isolated from humans in the United States. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 7:181–187 [PubMed]
8. Folster JP, Pecic G, McCullough A, Rickert R, Whichard JM. 2011. Characterization of bla(CMY)-encoding plasmids among Salmonella isolated in the United States in 2007. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 8:1289–1294 [PubMed]
9. Jacoby GA, Han P. 1996. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:908–911 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Jolley KA, Maiden MC. 2010. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinform. 11:595 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-595 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Jones TF, et al. 2008. Salmonellosis outcomes differ substantially by serotype. J. Infect. Dis. 198:109–114 [PubMed]
12. Kim SR, Komano T. 1997. The plasmid R64 thin pilus identified as a type IV pilus. J. Bacteriol. 179:3594–3603 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. U. S. Food and Drug Administration 2009. NARMS retail meat annual report. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/SafetyHealth/AntimicrobialResistance/NationalAntimicrobialResistanceMonitoringSystem/UCM257587.pdf

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)