High Yield Production Process for Shigella Outer Membrane Particles

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035616

PLoS One. 2012; 7(6): e35616.

Published online 2012 June 6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035616

PMCID: PMC3368891

Copyright Berlanda Scorza et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

High Yield Production Process for Shigella Outer Membrane Particles

Francesco Berlanda Scorza,¹^¤ Anna Maria Colucci,¹ Luana Maggiore,¹ Silvia Sanzone,¹ Omar Rossi,¹ Ilaria Ferlenghi,² Isabella Pesce,¹ Mariaelena Caboni,¹ Nathalie Norais,² Vito Di Cioccio,¹ Allan Saul,¹ and Christiane Gerke¹^*

¹Novartis Vaccines Institute for Global Health, Siena, Italy

²Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy

Stefan Bereswill, Editor

Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Germany

* E-mail: christiane.gerke/at/novartis.com

Conceived and designed the experiments: FBS AMC SS NN VDC AS CG. Performed the experiments: FBS AMC LM SS OR IF IP MC VDC. Analyzed the data: FBS LM SS OR IF IP CG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: IF NN. Wrote the paper: FBS CG.

^¤Current address: Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy

Received July 6, 2011; Accepted March 22, 2012.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Gram-negative bacteria naturally shed particles that consist of outer membrane lipids, outer membrane proteins, and soluble periplasmic components. These particles have been proposed for use as vaccines but the yield has been problematic. We developed a high yielding production process of genetically derived outer membrane particles from the human pathogen Shigella sonnei. Yields of approximately 100 milligrams of membrane-associated proteins per liter of fermentation were obtained from cultures of S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU at optical densities of 30–45 in a 5 L fermenter. Proteomic analysis of the purified particles showed the preparation to primarily contain predicted outer membrane and periplasmic proteins. These were highly immunogenic in mice. The production of these outer membrane particles from high density cultivation of bacteria supports the feasibility of scaling up this approach as an affordable manufacturing process. Furthermore, we demonstrate the feasibility of using this process with other genetic manipulations e.g. abolition of O antigen synthesis and modification of the lipopolysaccharide structure in order to modify the immunogenicity or reactogenicity of the particles. This work provides the basis for a large scale manufacturing process of Generalized Modules of Membrane Antigens (GMMA) for production of vaccines from Gram-negative bacteria.

Introduction

Shigella spp. are Gram-negative bacteria that infect the intestinal epithelium and cause dysentery. In 1999 the World Health Organization estimated an annual burden of 164.7 million shigellosis cases throughout the year of which 163.2 occur in developing countries, including 1.1 million deaths, mostly in children younger than 5 years of age [1]. Four serogroups have been identified: S. dysenteriae (15 serotypes), S. boydii (20 serotypes), S. flexneri (14 serotypes) and S. sonnei (1 serotype) [2]. No vaccine is currently available. So far, vaccine candidates based on O antigen conjugates and live attenuated strains have been shown in clinical trials to protect against homologous strains [2]–[6]. Vaccines using inactivated bacteria or subcellular components are at various stages of development [3], [6].

Gram-negative bacteria naturally shed outer membrane particles consisting of outer membrane lipids, outer membrane proteins, and enclosed periplasmic proteins [7]–[9]. Unlike most unilamellar biological vesicles, outer membrane particles are formed by blebbing and not by invagination of the membrane. Thus, the orientation of components in the membrane of the outer membrane particles is the same as in the bacterial outer membrane and the components in the outer face of the bacterial outer membrane are also in the outer face of the outer membrane particles [7]. Outer membrane particles are naturally shed at low concentration. Mutations such as the deletion of gene gna33 in Neisseria meningitidis [10] or modifications of the tol-pal pathway of Escherichia coli, Shigella flexneri, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium [11], [12] can increase the level of shedding. Especially, deletion of the tolR gene in E. coli has been shown to result in substantial overproduction of outer membrane particles without loss of membrane integrity [11], [13]. Studies have characterized the protein content of these outer membrane particles [10], [13], and unlike conventional detergent-extracted outer membrane vesicles derived from homogenized bacteria they are almost free of cytoplasmic and inner membrane components and maintain lipoproteins. The outer membrane particles used for those proteomic studies have been derived in small quantities from cells grown to low cell density.

It has been previously proposed that outer membrane particles could be exploited for use as vaccines [10], [12]. The immunogenicity of outer membrane particles from a variety of Gram-negative bacteria has been studied. Consistent with their high content of stimulators of the innate immune system, e.g. lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [7] and Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) agonists [14], they are strongly immunogenic in the absence of adjuvant. They have been shown to induce protection in mice against multiple pathogens, including Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium [15], Helicobacter pylori [16], Vibrio cholera [17], [18], or to elicit antibodies in mice with in vitro bactericidal activity, e.g. for Neisseria meningitidis [19]. Recently, outer membrane particles from Shigella flexneri 2a have been shown to confer protection in mice after mucosal immunization [20]. Although these studies suggest that outer membrane particles may form the basis of vaccines [15], [17], [18], there remain several problems: their reactogenicity and the difficulty of purifying them in the quantity and at costs that would make them attractive as vaccines for the public sector most impacted by diseases such as shigellosis.

The problem of reactogenicity is amenable to genetic manipulation. A variety of strategies has been examined to attenuate the pyrogenicity of LPS by modifying genes involved in lipid A biosynthesis, e.g. msbB and htrB in Shigella and E. coli or lpxL in Neisseria that are required for complete acylation and thereby pyrogenicity of lipid A [21]–[24]. However, a major remaining difficulty is developing a scalable method for the high volume and low unit cost production of vaccines based on this method.

In this paper we show that high purity outer membrane particles from Shigella sonnei mutant strains can be produced from fermentation in chemically defined medium with high yield using a simple purification process thus making production of inexpensive vaccines feasible. We believe that this process will be widely applicable for production of Gram-negative membrane antigens and thus call it the ‘Generalized Modules for Membrane Antigens (GMMA)’ process. In the literature, outer membrane particles that are either naturally released or produced by genetically modified strains are usually referred to as outer membrane vesicles (OMV). The same term has also been used for the vesicles derived by detergent-extraction of homogenized bacteria currently used as vaccines, e.g. MeNZB, an outer membrane vesicle vaccine used to control Neisseria meningitidis type B infections in New Zealand. In order to differentiate the two substantially different types of OMV [10] we chose the term GMMA to specify the particles released from the surface of intact cells used in this study.

Methods

Construction of Shigella Sonnei 53G Mutants

Shigella sonnei 53G [25] was chosen as parent strain. The null mutants tolR [13], galU [26], and msbB1 [21] were obtained by replacing the gene coding sequence with a resistance cassette [27]. Kanamycin was used for tolR, chloramphenicol for galU and erythromycin for msbB1. To achieve this, we used a three step PCR protocol to fuse the gene upstream and downstream regions to the resistance gene. Briefly, the upstream and downstream regions of the gene were amplified from Shigella sonnei 53G genomic DNA with the primer pairs gene.AB.500-5/gene.ABL-3 and gene.AB.L-5/gene.AB.500-3, respectively (details of target ‘gene’, antibiotic cassette ‘AB’ and sequence are reported in Table 1). The kanamycin cassette was amplified from pUC4K [28] and the cat gene from pKOBEG [29] using the primers ampli.AB-5/ampliAB-3 (Table 1). Finally the three amplified fragments were fused together by mixing 100 ng of each in a PCR reaction containing the gene.AB.500-5/gene.AB.500-3 primers. The linear fragment to delete tolR was used to transform recombination-prone Shigella sonnei 53G carrying pAJD434 to obtain the respective deletion mutant S. sonnei ΔtolR. Recombination-prone S. sonnei ΔtolR was then transformed with the linear fragment for the deletion of galU, resulting in mutant strain S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU. A clone of S. sonnei ΔtolR lacking the virulence plasmid, S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR, was selected by white appearance on congo red agar. The curing of the virulence plasmid (pSS) was confirmed by the absence of the origin of replication and the plasmid encoded gene wzy using primers pS.so53G.oriF/pS.so53G.oriR and pS.so53G.wzyF/pS.so53G.wzyR respectively (Table 1). Two functional msbB genes are present in Shigella [21]. In the ΔtolR background, the copy located on the virulence plasmid (msbB2) was removed by curing the plasmid and the plasmid pΔmsbBko::ery was constructed to delete the gene msbB1 on the chromosome. Upstream and downstream flanking regions of the msbB1 gene were amplified by PCR with the XbaI.msbB.5′.F/EcoRV.msbB.5′.R and EcoRV.msbB.3′.F/XhoI.msbB.3′.R primers, respectively. Both products were cloned into the pBluescript (Stratagene) vector in Max Efficiency® E. coli DH5α™^-T1^R (Invitrogen). The erm erythromycin resistance gene [30] was amplified with primers EcoRV.Ery.F/EcoRV.Ery.R and was inserted into the EcoRV site between the flanking regions generating pΔmsbBko::ery. Primers XbaI.msbB.5′.F/XhoI.msbB.3′.R were used to amplify by PCR a linear fragment from pΔmsbBko::ery plasmid, containing the resistance cassette flanked by msbB1 flanking regions that was used to transform the recombination-prone plasmid-cured Shigella sonnei 53G ΔtolR strain to generate the msbB knockout mutant. Recombination-prone Shigella sonnei 53G cells were produced by using the highly proficient homologous recombination system as previously described (red operon) [31] encoded on pAJD434 [32]. pAJD434 was subsequently removed from the mutant strains.

Table 1

Primers used in this study.

Bacterial Strain Growth Conditions and Media

Shigella sonnei and E. coli strains were routinely cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. When required, kanamycin (30 µg/mL), chloramphenicol (20 µg/mL), trimethoprim (100 µg/mL), or ampicillin (100 µg/mL) were added. Tryptic soy agar (30 g/L tryptic soy broth, 15 g/L agar) supplemented with 150 mg/L congo red was used to evaluate the presence of the virulence plasmid in Shigella. GMMA were prepared from cultures grown in flasks or in a 5 L fermenter (Applikon) in yeast extract medium (HTMC) or Shigella sonnei defined medium (SSDM). HTMC was prepared as follows: yeast extract 30 g/L, KH₂PO₄ 5 g/L, K₂HPO₄ 20 g/L, MgSO₄*7H₂O 1.2 g/L, glycerol 15 g/L, polypropylene glycol (PPG) 0.25 g/L. SSDM was prepared as follows: glycerol 30 g/L, KH₂PO₄ 13.3 g/L, (NH₄)₂HPO₄ 4 g/L, MgSO₄*7H₂O 1.2 g/L, citric acid 1.7 g/L, CoCl₂*6H₂O 2.5 mg/L, MnCl₂*4H₂O 15 mg/L, CuCl₂*2H₂O 1.5 mg/L, H₃BO₃ 3 mg/L, Na₂MoO₄*2H₂O 2.5 mg/L, Zn(CH₃COO)₂*2H₂O 13 mg/L, ferric citrate 2 µM (unless specified differently in text), thiamine 50 mg/L, nicotinic acid 10 mg/L, L-aspartic acid 2.5 g/L, PPG 0.25 g/L. For fermentation, starter cultures were grown from glycerol stocks to OD 0.8 and subsequently transferred to the 5 L fermenter to reach a starting OD of 0.02. Dissolved oxygen was maintained at 30% saturation by controlling agitation and setting maximum aeration. The pH was maintained at 7.2 in HTMC or at 6.7 in SSDM, with 4 M ammonium hydroxide by a pH controller and temperature was kept constant either at 37°C or at 30°C. From flask cultures, supernatants were collected by 10 min centrifugation at 4000 g followed by 0.22 µm filtration or by tangential flow filtration. The optical density (OD) of cultures was measured at 600 nm wavelength.

Tangential Flow Filtration Purification

A 2-step tangential flow filtration (TFF) process was used to purify GMMA. During the first TFF step, the culture supernatant which contains the GMMA was separated from the bacteria using a 0.2 µm pore size cassette (Sartocon HYDROSART 0.2 µm, Sartorius). When approximately 80% of the starting feed was recovered as filtrate, the remaining biomass (retentate) was washed in five diafiltration steps with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The GMMA-containing culture supernatant and the GMMA-containing filtrate of the diafiltration steps were combined. In a modified process the diafiltration of the biomass was omitted. Experiments performed without this diafiltration step are specified in the text. In the second step, the combined filtrate was micro-filtered using a 0.1 µm pore size membrane (Sartocon SLICE 200 0.1 µm, Sartorius) in order to separate GMMA that remain in the retentate from soluble proteins (filtrate). After five diafiltration steps using PBS, the retentate containing the GMMA was collected and sterile filtered using a 0.22 µm Express™ PLUS stericup (Millipore).

Protein Quantification

Proteins were quantified by Bradford method, using bovine serum albumin as standard. GMMA were boiled for 10 minutes in 3.0 M guanidine hydrochloride prior quantification.

Negative Staining Electron Microscopy

A drop of 5 µL of GMMA suspension was placed on copper formvar/carbon-coated grids and adsorbed for 5 min. Grids were then washed with few drops of distilled water and blotted with a Whatman filter paper. For negative staining, grids were treated with 2% uranyl acetate in ddH₂O for 1 min, air-dried and viewed with a CM100 transmission electron microscope (Philips, Eindoven, the Netherlands) operating at 80 kV. Electron micrographs were recorded at a nominal magnification of 60000×.

Denaturing Mono-Dimensional Electrophoresis

GMMA were denatured for 3 min at 95°C in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer containing 2% (wt/vol) SDS. 20 µg of proteins were loaded onto 12% (wt/vol) or 4–12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gels (BioRad, Hercules, U.S.A.). Gels were run in 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (BioRad) and were stained with Coomassie Blue R-250.

Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis

Two hundred micrograms of GMMA were separated by 2-dimentional electrophoresis (2-DE) as previously described [10]. Briefly, proteins were separated in the first dimension on a non linear pH 3–11 gradient and in the second dimension on a linear 4–12% polyacrylamide gradient unless specified in text. Gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie G-250 [33].

Densitometry Analysis

SDS-PAGE and 2-DE gels were scanned with an Image Quant 400 (GE Healthcare). Images were analyzed with the software Image master 2D Platinum 6.0 (Amersham Biosciences).

In-Gel Protein Digestion and MALDI-TOF Analysis

Protein spots were excised from the gels and processed as previously described [13]. Mass spectra were acquired on a Ultraflex MALDI TOF-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) in reflectron, positive mode, in the mass range of 900 to 3,500 Da. Spectra were externally calibrated by using a combination of standards pre-spotted on the target (Bruker Daltonics). MS spectra were analyzed by Protein Mass Fingerprint (PMF) with flexAnalysis (flexAnalysis version 2.4, Bruker Daltonics). Monoisotopic peaks were annotated with flexAnalysis default parameters and manually revised. Protein identification was carried from the generated peak list using the Mascot program (Mascot server version 2.2.01, Matrix Science). Mascot was run on a database containing protein sequences deduced from seven sequenced Shigella genomes, downloaded from NCBInr or from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute database. Genomes used were from strains Shigella sonnei 53G, Shigella flexneri 2a str. 301, Shigella flexneri 2a str. 2457T, Shigella sonnei Ss046, Shigella boydii Sb227, Shigella flexneri 5 str. 8401, Shigella boydii CDC 3083-94. Search parameters, mass tolerance, known contaminant ions, validation and handling of multiple matches were performed as described previously [13].

Protein Precipitation and In-solution Protein Digestion

Proteins from supernatants or purified GMMA were precipitated by adding TCA and deoxycholate to a final concentration of 10% and 0.04%, respectively. The precipitation was allowed to proceed for 30 min at 4°C. The precipitate was recovered by 10 min centrifugation at 20,000×g at 4°C. The pellet was washed once with 10% TCA (wt/vol) and twice with absolute ethanol, dried with Speedvac (Labconco, Kansas City, U.S.A). For analysis by SDS-PAGE, the precipitates were resuspended with 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, and quantified. For LC-MS/MS analysis 20 µg of GMMA were precipitated and resuspended in 50 µL, 6 M guanidinium chloride, 5 mM DTT, 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Denaturation proceeded for 60 min at 60°C. Prior to digestion, the solution was diluted 1 [ratio]

8 with a solution of 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM DTT and 5 µg of trypsin (Promega) were added to the diluted solution. Digestion was carried out over night at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by adding formic acid to 0.1%. Peptides were extracted using Oasis extraction cartridges (HLB 1cc (30 mg) extraction cartridges, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

Protein Identification by Nano-LC-MS/MS

Peptides were separated by nano-LC on a NanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters) connected to a Q-ToF Premier ESI mass spectrometer equipped with a nanospray source (Waters). Samples were loaded onto a NanoAcquity 1.7 µm BEH130 C18 column (75 µm×25 mm; Waters) through a NanoAcquity 5 µm Symmetry C18 trap column (180 µm×20 mm; Waters). Peptides were eluted with a 120 min gradient of 2–40% acetonitrile (98%), 0.1% formic acid solution at a flow rate of 250 nL/min. The eluted peptides were subjected to an automated data-dependent acquisition using the MassLynx software, version 4.1 (Waters) where an MS survey scan was used to automatically select multicharged peptides over the m/z ratio range of 300–2000 for further MS/MS fragmentation. Up to eight different peptides were individually subjected to MS/MS fragmentation following each MS survey scan. After data acquisition, individual MS/MS spectra were combined, smoothed, and centroided using ProteinLynx, version 3.5 (Waters) to obtain the peak list file. The Mascot Daemon application (Matrix Science Ltd., London, UK) was used for the automatic submission of data files to in-house licensed Mascot, version 2.2.1, running on a local server. The Mascot search parameters were set to (i) 2 as the number of allowed missed cleavages (only for trypsin digestion), (ii) methionine oxidation as variable modifications, (iii) 0.05 Da as the peptide tolerance, and (iv) 0.05 Da as the MS/MS tolerance. Only significant hits were considered as defined by the Mascot scoring and probability system.

Bioinformatics

Prediction of protein localization was carried out using PSORTb v3.0 [34] and Lipo program [35].

Mouse Immunizations

Outbred CD1 mice (female, 4 to 6 weeks of age) received three injections of GMMA via the subcutaneous route on days 0, 21, and 35. Each injection contained GMMA normalized to 0.2 µg or 2 µg of protein and formulated in PBS only, with Freund’s adjuvant (FA), or adsorbed onto aluminum hydroxide (alum), 2 mg/mL, in a final volume of 100 µL. If Freund’s adjuvant was used, Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA) was used for the first immunization, Freund’s incomplete adjuvant (ICFA) was used for the second and third immunization. Control mice received either adjuvant or PBS alone. Blood samples were collected before immunization and 14 days after the second and third injection. The animal experiments complied with the relevant guidelines of Italy and the institutional policies of Novartis. The animal protocol was approved by the Animal Welfare Body of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy, approval number AEC 2009-05.

Western Blot

GMMA were boiled in loading buffer and loaded on 12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide-SDS gels (BioRad) or on 2D gels as described. Gels were run in MOPS buffer (BioRad) and protein were subsequently transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane using Trans-blot transfer medium (BioRad). The membranes were blocked in PBS containing 3% (wt/vol) powdered milk, then incubated with mouse polyclonal antisera diluted (1 [ratio]

1000) in PBS containing 3% (wt/vol) milk for 90 min at 37°C. Membranes were washed three times with PBS containing Tween 20, 0.1% (vol/vol) and then incubated with sheep anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG (GE Healthcare, UK Limited), diluted (1 [ratio]

7500) in PBS containing 3% (wt/vol) milk. Colorimetric staining was performed, after washing the membranes, with SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate Kit (Pierce, Rockford, U.S.A.) as described by the manufacturer. Positive signals were related to the corresponding proteins by comparing the Western blot membrane to the gel using Ponceau staining of the membrane as a reference and aligning the images with Image master 2D Platinum 6.0.

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

To measure Shigella sonnei GMMA-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) in mice serum, Nunc Maxisorb 96-well plates were coated over night at 2 to 8°C with 100 µL/well of a 0.5 µg/mL suspension of Shigella sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR GMMA, purified from defined medium with 2 µM ferric citrate in the same way as the GMMA in the vaccine, diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Plates were then washed three times with 300 µL/well of phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 20 (PBST) and blocked with PBS containing 1% (wt/vol) BSA for 60 min at 37°C. Serial dilutions of reference and sample sera were prepared in PBST, 1% (wt/vol) BSA in a separate dilution plate, and 100 µL/well of each serial dilution was transferred to the coated plate, incubated for 2 hours at 37°C, and then washed as described above. Bound antibody was detected using a goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase, diluted in PBST, 1% (wt/vol) BSA to 1 [ratio]

5000 and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. After a wash with PBST, 100 µL/well of p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate dissolved in diethanolamine buffer (1 M, pH 9.8) was added, and after 20 minutes optical densities were measured with a plate reader (ELx800, BioTek) at 405 and 490 nm wavelength. Absorbance at 490 nm was subtracted from the absorbance at 405 nm. Results are expressed in arbitrary ELISA units relative to a standard serum raised against GMMA from S. sonnei 53G ΔtolR ΔgalU. One unit equals the reciprocal of the dilution of the standard serum giving an OD_405–490 of 1 in the assay. All samples were measured in duplicate.

Statistical Analysis

Antibody levels (ELISA units) in different groups after the third immunization were compared by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. A p value of 0.05 was considered to be significant. For multiple comparisons the p value considered to be significant in each of the comparisons was adjusted according to the number of analyses.

Results

Generation of a Shigella Sonnei 53G Strain Capable of Overproducing Modified GMMA

The first aim of the study was to investigate if Shigella sonnei 53G could be developed as a strain suitable to overproduce GMMA through modification of the Tol-Pal system. A null mutation of the tolR gene was introduced as this has previously been demonstrated to result in overproduction of GMMA in E. coli [11], [13]. The mutation in the tolR gene led to the release of large amounts of GMMA from the surface of S. sonnei 53G as assessed by SDS page (Fig. 1A). The deletion of tolR had no detectable influence on bacterial growth (data not shown). In addition, to test if GMMA overproduction is also feasible in strains with additional genetic modifications we removed the O antigen of the LPS, either by deletion of galU [26] or by curing the virulence plasmid from strain S. sonnei 53G ΔtolR as the biosynthesis genes for the O antigen in Shigella sonnei are encoded on the plasmid [36]. GMMA obtained from S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU showed a similar protein profile to GMMA obtained from S. sonnei ΔtolR with minor differences in the 37 kDa to 50 kDa range and proteins smaller than 30 kDa appeared to be less abundant in S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU (Fig. 1A). Also GMMA obtained from the plasmid-cured S. sonnei ΔtolR mutant (S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR) showed a nearly identical protein pattern to GMMA from S. sonnei ΔtolR (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1

Comparison of Shigella sonnei GMMA from different strains and different conditions.

Furthermore, the genes msbB1 and msbB2 involved in lipid A biosynthesis were deleted since these deletions have previously been reported to decrease LPS toxicity in Shigella [21]. As the gene msbB2 is encoded on the virulence plasmid and thus absent in S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR we deleted the chromosomal gene msbB1 in this strain to generate a mutant strain lacking msbB1 and msbB2. For simplicity the ΔmsbB1ΔmsbB2 mutant is referred to as the ΔmsbB mutant. The ΔmsbB mutant was selected at 37°C on LB plates and grew in LB and yeast extract at 37°C with a duplication time of about 55 min compared to a duplication time of about 28 min for the single ΔtolR mutant. In the defined medium developed for fermentation, the plasmid-cured ΔtolR ΔmsbB mutant strain (S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB) was able to grow to high optical density (OD) at 30°C, but grew poorly at 37°C. Thus, for generation of GMMA from S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB cultivation in chemically defined medium at a growth temperature of 30°C was chosen. GMMA from S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB produced under these conditions showed a similar protein pattern to GMMA generated by S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR and S. sonnei ΔtolR with only minor variation in relative amounts of proteins visible by SDS-PAGE in the 45–75 kDa range (Fig. 1A). In order to test if the lower temperature would change the GMMA composition we compared GMMA derived from S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR at 30°C or 37°C. Only few differences were detected as highlighted in Fig. 1B, indicating that GMMA can be generated at 30°C without major effects on the composition. In conclusion, deletion of tolR greatly enhanced GMMA release while additional genetic modification of the strain or a change in growth temperature only had minor effects on the protein composition visible by SDS-PAGE.

High Density Cultivation of Shigella Sonnei

To investigate the feasibility to produce GMMA at large scale, S. sonnei 53G ΔtolR ΔgalU, S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR, and S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB were tested for their capacity to grow to high densities in a 5 liter reactor. Starter cultures were grown in flasks to OD 0.8 and were then transferred to the 5 L fermenter to reach a starting OD of 0.02. Dissolved oxygen was maintained at 30% saturation. The pH was maintained at 7.2 in HTMC or at 6.7 in SSDM and the temperature was kept constant either at 37°C or at 30°C when S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB was used. Under these conditions, cultures with optical densities of 45 to 80 were obtained.

Iron-regulated proteins have previously been shown to be important in vaccine formulations against Pasteurella and Salmonella [37], [38]. Thus, we evaluated if the GMMA process would allow the upregulation of iron-regulated proteins. Growth of S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR with 0.2 µM iron concentration in chemically defined medium led to the induction of iron-regulated proteins but hindered high density cultivation of bacteria. The addition of 2 µM iron to the medium was sufficient to allow optimal growth and the induction of three iron-regulated proteins visible by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1C), identified by protein mass fingerprint as FepA (gi|74311118), IutA (gi|74313972) and Colicin I receptor (gi|74312677). The expression of these proteins was reduced when bacteria were grown in 200 µM iron (Fig. 1C). In bacteria grown in HTMC the iron-regulated proteins are expressed to a similar level as in chemically defined medium with 200 µM iron (data not shown). Their presence was confirmed by protein mass fingerprint analysis of GMMA generated from S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU grown in HTMC (Table 2, proteins 8, 10, 12). Growth of S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB at 30°C in defined medium with 2 µM iron also enhanced expression of FepA and IutA. Colicin I receptor (marked in Fig. 1C) was less expressed than in GMMA from S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR prepared from cultures grown at 37°C (data not shown).

Table 2

Shigella sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU GMMA-associated proteins identified by proteomics.

Purification of GMMA from High Density Culture Supernatant

So far, GMMA have always been purified from flask cultures by ultracentrifugation [13]. Cultures were centrifuged at low speed (4000 g) to separate biomass from supernatant which was subsequently filtered through a 0.22 µm filter. GMMA present in the supernatant were collected by ultracentrifugation, washed, and then resuspended and stored in PBS [10], [13]. Since this technique is not suitable for large volumes we developed a scalable purification method to purify GMMA from high density cultures using tangential flow filtration (TFF). In TFF, also known as crossflow filtration, the feed stream is pumped tangentially across the surface of the membrane rather than into the filter as in conventional ‘dead-end’ filtration. A proportion of the soluble components and particles smaller than the membrane’s pores penetrates the filter (filtrate/permeate). The remainder (retentate) is circulated back to the reservoir and over the filter again. In this way, the larger particles do not build up at the surface of the filter but are swept away by the tangential flow allowing smaller molecules to continuously reach and pass through the membrane. This feature makes TFF an efficient process for size separation, concentration and diafiltration.

GMMA were purified from fermentation cultures in a 2-step TFF process. In the first step, the culture supernatant that contains the GMMA was separated from the bacteria using a 0.2 µm filter. In this step, the bacteria remained in the retentate and GMMA transferred into the filtrate. In the second filtration step using a 0.1 µm filter, GMMA were separated from soluble components present in the culture supernatant, including proteins secreted by the bacteria or released by lysis. In this step, GMMA were retained by the filter and collected and concentrated in the retentate whereas soluble proteins passed through the filter. We tested this purification process under two slightly different conditions. Firstly, when the fermentation culture of S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU reached OD 45, the culture was transferred directly from the fermenter to the first TFF and the culture supernatant containing the GMMA was collected. The retained biomass was washed with 5 volumes of PBS buffer (diafiltration) to recover remaining GMMA and the filtrate containing these GMMA was combined with the culture supernatant. In the slightly modified purification process tested, this diafiltration step was omitted. Proteins were quantified by Bradford method. In the purification performed with diafiltration of the biomass the total protein content of the TFF 0.2 µm filtrate was approximately 1.5 g/L of fermentation culture of which 15% was GMMA-associated as determined by separation of the soluble components from the high molecular weight portion (GMMA) via an ultracentrifuge step (Fig. 2 and Table 3). In the second TFF step, GMMA were concentrated in the retentate and washed with five volumes of PBS to remove remaining soluble proteins. As TFF is usually performed under non-sterile conditions, the final retentate was sterilized by filtration through a 0.22 µm filter. An aliquot of the sterilized retentate was subjected to ultracentrifugation to determine the content of GMMA as above. As shown in Fig. 2 most of the proteins in the retentate are GMMA-associated. Protein quantification of the retentate, of the GMMA fraction, and of the supernatant of the ultracentrifugation step (soluble proteins) determined that 90% of all protein present in the retentate was GMMA-associated (Table 3). Thus, soluble proteins were efficiently removed in this step (Fig. 2). GMMA recovery after the 0.1 µm TFF step was 56% of the quantity present after the 0.2 µm cassette. The final yield of GMMA was 120 milligrams of proteins per liter of fermentation (Table 3). In two subsequent tests of the purification method with S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU without diafiltration of the biomass, a lower amount of GMMA was obtained in the 0.2 µm TFF filtrate (Table 3). However, recovery of GMMA in the second TFF step (0.1 µm) was enhanced resulting in an overall similar yield of GMMA with equivalent purity (Table 3 and suppl. figures Fig. S1, Fig. S2). This suggests, firstly, that washing of the biomass increases the recovery GMMA from the fermentation culture, and secondly, that a higher starting concentration might be beneficial for the second TFF step. The 0.1 µm TFF step can likely be optimized to take advantage of the larger amounts of GMMA obtained by diafiltration of the biomass. Fermentations of S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB resulted in yields of 140 mg/L from a culture at OD 65 (2.2 mg/L/OD) and 230 mg/L from a culture at OD 80 (2.9 mg/L/OD), demonstrating that the yield of GMMA can be further improved by growing the culture to a higher OD.

Figure 2

GMMA enrichment and purity after TFF.

Table 3

Yield, purity, and recovery rate of GMMA by the high yield production process.

The preparation of GMMA generated from S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB obtained after the second TFF step was subjected to electron microscopy analysis, revealing the presence of well-organized membrane vesicles with a diameter of about 30–60 nm (Fig. 3) which is consistent with the reported average size of 40±20 nm of outer membrane particles produced by E. coli tol-pal mutants [11].

Figure 3

Electron microscopy of Shigella sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU GMMA.

Characterization of GMMA Protein Content

GMMA purified by TFF from S. sonnei 53G ΔtolR ΔgalU grown in high density culture were characterized to confirm their integrity and to analyze their protein content. One- and two-dimensional SDS-PAGE of GMMA and densitometry analysis (Fig. 1D and Fig. 4) were used to determine the protein profile and to study relative protein quantities of the most abundant proteins. Most of the Coomassie blue-stained bands and spots were identified using peptide mass fingerprint (Table 2). OmpA and OmpC are known to be among the most abundant proteins present in the outer membrane. In fact, densitometry analysis of GMMA from S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU grown in HTMC and analyzed by 1D SDS-PAGE indicated that OmpA and OmpC together contribute for 45% of the total protein; OmpX, 9%; Slp, 6%; YfiO, 5.6%; TolB, 2.3%; TolC 1.4%; and YaeT, 1.8% (Fig. 1D). With the exception of the predicted periplasmic protein TolB, all of these proteins are predicted to be associated with the outer membrane. YfiO is predicted to be an outer membrane lipoprotein. OmpA, OmpC, OmpX, Slp, TolC, and YaeT are predicted to be outer membrane proteins. Thus, the seven most abundant outer membrane-associated proteins account for approximately 69% of the protein amount in GMMA. Further densitometry analysis after 2D SDS-PAGE determined that there are approximately equal quantities of OmpA and OmpC (OmpA:OmpC is 1 [ratio]

0.83 by densitometry of a Coomassie blue-stained gel). In order to identify the diverse and less expressed proteins, GMMA were studied by proteolytic digestion and reverse phase liquid chromatography coupled to MS/MS. 61 proteins were identified in total (LC-MS/MS, 1D and 2D SDS-PAGE PMF) (Table 2), with 31 of these proteins predicted to be associated with the outer membrane (Fig. 5). Of these, 14 proteins were predicted to be outer membrane proteins and 17 to be outer membrane lipoproteins. In addition, 16 proteins were predicted to be periplasmic, 8 to be cytoplasmic, 1 to be located in the inner membrane, and for 5 proteins no prediction could be obtained. No inner membrane lipoproteins were predicted. Thus, GMMA generated by the high yield production process are mostly composed of outer membrane-associated and periplasmic proteins as previously seen for outer membrane particles release from cultures at the early logarithmic phase [10], [13].

Figure 4

2D gel electrophoresis of Shigella sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU GMMA and immunoblot.

Figure 5

Shigella sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU GMMA proteome.

GMMA Immunogenicity

Groups of 8 CD1 mice were immunized 3 times with GMMA (2 µg of total protein) obtained from S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR and S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB, both grown in defined medium with 2 µM iron, and S. sonnei 53G ΔtolR ΔgalU grown in HTMC. GMMA from S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR ΔgalU, S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR and S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB were also administered in combination with Freund’s adjuvant (FA). Freund’s complete adjuvant was used in the first immunization and Freund’s incomplete adjuvant was used in the second and third immunization. In addition, a lower dosage of 0.2 µg of GMMA from S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB was tested. Serum samples were obtained 2 weeks after the second and third doses and analyzed individually. Mice immunized with GMMA showed very high IgG responses to all 3 types of GMMA that were tested. No difference was found between groups immunized with different GMMA or between groups receiving the same GMMA with or without FA (Fig. 6). Adsorption of GMMA onto alum as adjuvant also did not have an effect on the IgG response (data not shown). Control mice immunized with PBS or FA alone had very low levels of anti-GMMA antibodies (Fig. 6). The 10-fold lower dosage of GMMA from S. sonnei 53G –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB (0.2 µg) resulted in a statistically significant, approximately 3-fold reduction in the IgG response compared to the group immunized with 2 µg of the same GMMA. However, the IgG response to the lower dosage still showed an approximately 8000-fold increase compared to preimmune sera (Fig. 6).

Figure 6

ELISA analysis of sera reactivity against GMMA.

To investigate which components of GMMA were responsible for the reactivity of the sera, 2D Western blots were performed. As GMMA from S. sonnei 53G ΔtolR ΔgalU were characterized best in respect to their protein content, sera from mice immunized with the GMMA from S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU were used to probe blots of 2D SDS-PAGE of GMMA from the same strain. Reactive proteins were identified by protein mass fingerprint. Several proteins were detected by the sera (Fig. 4 B) of which OmpA gave the strongest response. OmpC which is as abundant in GMMA as OmpA was not detected. Not all of the visible reactive proteins could be identified.

Discussion

Recent advances in genomics and reverse vaccinology have identified promising protein targets for vaccines [39]. In many cases, suitable candidate antigens for Gram-negative bacterial vaccines are outer membrane proteins and these pose particular challenges in their expression and purification and in serotype variability. An ideal delivery system especially for bacterial vaccines for developing countries will encompass multiple antigens and enable vaccines to be rapidly tailored to local and changing antigenic serotypes. Ideally, it will also be inexpensive to manufacture. We propose a platform for rapid development and delivery of vaccines against Gram-negative bacteria. The approach is based on the production of outer membrane particles we have named GMMA by genetically modified bacteria. Using genetic manipulation, it is possible to increase their yield, to remove immunodominant structures, to overexpress certain antigens, and to reduce the endotoxic activity [10], [13], [19], [21], [26], [40], [41]. GMMA could potentially be a safe, effective and low cost vaccine but need a practical way of manufacture at scale.

Shigella sonnei 53G was chosen for a first approach to develop a scalable process and a null mutation of the tolR gene was introduced to overproduce GMMA as previously described for E. coli [13]. To verify that the process is applicable to produce GMMA harboring modified lipid A, which would be more suitable for use as vaccine, and/or lacking the O antigen of the LPS we grew high density cultures of S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU, S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR (cured of the virulence plasmid pSS), and S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB in a 5 L fermenter in complex (HTMC) or chemically defined medium. Chemically defined medium was used to avoid contamination from proteins present in complex media and to have the possibility to regulate iron concentration.

Bacteria were removed from the culture supernatant by a tangential flow filtration step using a 0.2 µm membrane. A second tangential flow filtration step with a 0.1 µm membrane was used to concentrate GMMA and to remove soluble proteins. This choice of appropriate molecular weight membranes allowed the purification of GMMA in an easy, efficient, and scalable process. After purification, approximately 90% of all protein was consistently GMMA-associated with reproducible yields of more than 100 mg of GMMA-associated protein per liter fermentation volume from OD 30–45 cultures of S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU. The integrity of GMMA obtained by this process was confirmed using electron microscopy. The purity and yield can likely be increased as indicated by fermentations with S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB to densities of 65 and 80. Furthermore, first results obtained by quantitative amino acid analysis of different types of GMMA indicated an at least two-fold higher protein amount in the GMMA preparations than determined by the Bradford assay used in this study (data not shown). Still, assuming an average yield of 100 mg/L fermentation and a dosage of 25 µg as used for the MeNZB outer membrane vesicle meningococcal vaccine, at least 400,000 doses could be obtained from a 100 L fermenter.

A proteomic approach confirmed that Shigella sonnei 53G ΔtolR ΔgalU-derived GMMA are composed mostly of outer membrane and periplasmic components. They conserve lipophilic polypeptides. Only a small number of cytoplasmic components and one inner membrane protein were predicted. Thus, the proteomic analysis of GMMA obtained from an OD 45 culture revealed a similar composition as previously seen in proteomic analyses of outer membrane particles that were obtained from cultures at early logarithmic phase to avoid impurities by cytoplasmic proteins [10], [13].

In accordance with previous reports [15], [17] GMMA were highly immunogenic in mice with titers around 1 [ratio]

100,000 after administration of 2 µg of GMMA with and without adjuvant. A 10-fold lower dosage of GMMA (without adjuvant) resulted in only a 3-fold reduction and still very high antibody titers suggesting that low amounts of GMMA might be sufficient for vaccination. GMMA from the msbB mutant S. sonnei strain did not show a difference in immunogenicity which was expected due to a recent report that the resulting lipid A modification does not affect LPS recognition in mice [42]. Immunoblots confirmed that antibodies to proteins, including outer membrane proteins OmpA, OmpX, and YaeT, strongly contributed to the reactivity of the sera. Interestingly, the outer membrane protein OmpC which represents about 20% of protein in GMMA was not detected by sera raised against GMMA. Previously, an immunoproteomic analysis of isolated outer membrane proteins of Shigella flexneri 2a [43] also failed to detect OmpC as immunogenic protein. This could suggest that either OmpC is not immunogenic or that epitopes potentially recognized by antibodies are not maintained after SDS-PAGE. This might also apply to other membrane proteins that were not found by the Western blot analysis even though not all reactive proteins could be identified.

The msbB mutant strain of Shigella lacking the genes msbB1 and msbB2 [21] was generated to investigate if the production process was applicable to GMMA with modified lipid A. A previous report [21] had shown that these deletions result in the synthesis of a penta-acylated lipid A instead of a hexa-acylated lipid A in Shigella [21]. While the S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB mutant grows in rich media at 37°C temperature, its growth is impaired in the chemically defined medium developed for fermentation at 37°C but shows a normal growth in this medium at 30°C. Previously, a Shigella flexneri 5a msbB mutant and an E. coli msbB mutant in the K-12 background were reported not to show any growth defects [21], [23]. In contrast, an msbB mutant of the clinical isolate E. coli H16 formed filaments when grown at 37°C but not at 30°C or when functionally complemented by the cloned msbB gene [44]. The S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR ΔmsbB mutant strain used in this study does not form filaments. The reason for the slower growth at 37°C, especially in defined medium, is not clear and could be a result of the background of the strain, the combination of the tolR and msbB mutation, or a suboptimal composition of the defined medium that can likely be optimized. Importantly, a comparison of the protein pattern of GMMA generated from S. sonnei –pSS ΔtolR at 37°C and 30°C showed only minor differences in the protein profile visible by SDS-PAGE indicating that the change in temperature does not have major effects on GMMA composition.

In summary, we have identified an easy process to produce large quantities of GMMA from high density culture. GMMA purified from fermentation are extremely pure particles composed almost exclusively of outer membrane and periplasmic components. The simplicity and high yield of the process support its applicability for large scale manufacturing. We have also shown that this process can be used with strains genetically modified to reduce reactogenicity or to remove immunodominant antigens, e.g. the O antigen. While this work focused on Shigella sonnei, we believe that this technology is an innovative platform for efficient vaccine manufacturing for Gram-negative bacteria.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

GMMA enrichment and purity after TFF without diafiltration of the biomass. GMMA were purified from a 5 L fermentation culture of S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU grown in HTMC at 37°C to OD 39 (fermentation B2 in Table 3) using 2-step TFF. In the first step, the culture supernatant which contains the GMMA was separated from the bacteria using a 0.2 µm filter without further diafiltration of the biomass. To determine the amount of GMMA in the permeate GMMA were separated from soluble proteins by ultracentrifugation. After ultracentrifugation, the pellet (GMMA) was resuspended in the initial volume of the centrifuged material to normalize all samples to fermentation volume. Equivalent volumes of the 0.2 µm filtrate before ultracentrifugation (1), the resuspended GMMA pellet (2), and the supernatant of the ultracentrifugation (3) were separated by SDS-PAGE (12% PA) and showed a large amount of soluble proteins (3) in comparison to GMMA-associated proteins (2) to be present in the post 0.2 µm TFF permeate. In the second TFF step, GMMA were separated from soluble proteins using a 0.1 µm filter. The retentate (4) was analyzed by ultracentrifugation as described above and was found to contain almost exclusively GMMA (5) as determined by the strong reduction of soluble proteins (6). The high recovery rate of 83% in this process (see Table 3) is reflected in the similar strength of the visible protein bands in lane 2 (GMMA in the 0.2 µm TFF filtrate) and lane 5 (GMMA in the 0.1 µm retentate).

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(716K, tif)}

Figure S2

Reproducibility of purity and protein composition of GMMA obtained by the high yield production process. S. sonnei ΔtolR ΔgalU was grown in HTMC at 37°C in a 5 L fermenter to high densities of OD 30 (B1) and OD 39 (B2) and GMMA were purified using 2-step TFF. To determine the amount of GMMA in the retentate of the 0.1 µm TFF (purified GMMA) GMMA were separated from soluble proteins by ultracentrifugation. After ultracentrifugation, the pellets (GMMA) were resuspended in the initial volume of the centrifuged material to normalize all samples to fermentation volume. Equivalent volumes of the retentate before ultracentrifugation (1), the resuspended GMMA pellet (2), and the supernatant of the ultracentrifugation (3) were separated by SDS-PAGE (12% PA). The retentates were found to contain almost exclusively GMMA (2) as determined by the strong reduction of soluble proteins (3). In addition, the protein pattern in GMMA from the 2 fermentations was very similar suggesting good reproducibility of the process. Minor differences in the visible amount of proteins are highlighted by arrows.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(407K, tif)}

Acknowledgments

We thank Filipe Marques and Graziella Di Salvo, NVGH, for assistance with the ELISA, Fabiola Giusti, University of Siena, Department of Evolutionary Biology, for assistance with the electron microscopy, Myron M. Levine, University of Maryland, Baltimore for providing Shigella sonnei 53G, and Andrew J. Darwin, New York University School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, for plasmid pAJD434. We are grateful to Rino Rappuoli, NV&D, and Calman MacLennan, NVGH, for critical feedback on the manuscript.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following conflicts: Francesco Berlanda Scorza, Anna Maria Colucci, Luana Maggiore, Silvia Sanzone, Omar Rossi, Isabella Pesce, Mariaelena Caboni, Vito Di Cioccio, Allan Saul, and Christiane Gerke are or were at the time the study was conducted employees of Novartis Vaccines Institute for Global Health, Siena, Italy. Ilaria Ferlenghi and Nathalie Norais are employees of Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy. The submitted work is included in the patent applications ‘Hyperblebbing Shigella strains’ WO/2011/036564 and ‘Purification of bacterial vesicles’ WO/2011/036562 submitted by Novartis Vaccines Institute for Global Health. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Funding: The work was funded in part by a grant (#51833) from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through the Grant Challenges Explorations Initiative and in part by Novartis Vaccines Institute for Global Health (NVGH). Several of the authors are or were employed by NVGH and, as such, NVGH played a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript. The B&M Gates Foundation had no role in these activities.

References

1. Kotloff KL, Winickoff JP, Ivanoff B, Clemens JD, Swerdlow DL, et al. Global burden of Shigella infections: implications for vaccine development and implementation of control strategies. Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77:651–666. [PubMed]

2. Levine MM, Kotloff KL, Barry EM, Pasetti MF, Sztein MB. Clinical trials of Shigella vaccines: two steps forward and one step back on a long, hard road. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:540–553. [PubMed]

3. Kweon M-N. Shigellosis: the current status of vaccine development. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:313–318. [PubMed]

4. Passwell JH, Ashkenzi S, Banet-Levi Y, Ramon-Saraf R, Farzam N, et al. Age-related efficacy of Shigella O-specific polysaccharide conjugates in 1–4-year-old Israeli children. Vaccine. 2010;28:2231–2235. [PubMed]

5. Cohen D, Ashkenazi S, Green M, Gdalevich M, Yavzori M, et al. Clinical trials of Shigella vaccines in Israel. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1996;397:159–167. [PubMed]

6. Kaminski RW, Oaks EV. Inactivated and subunit vaccines to prevent shigellosis. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009;8:1693–1704. [PubMed]

7. Beveridge TJ. Structures of gram-negative cell walls and their derived membrane vesicles. Journal of Bacteriology. 1999;181:4725–4733. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

8. Kuehn MJ, Kesty NC. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and the host-pathogen interaction. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2645–2655. [PubMed]

9. Kulp A, Kuehn MJ. Biological functions and biogenesis of secreted bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010;64:163–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

10. Ferrari G, Garaguso I, Adu-Bobie J, Doro F, Taddei AR, et al. Outer membrane vesicles from group B Neisseria meningitidis Δgna33 mutant: proteomic and immunological comparison with detergent-derived outer membrane vesicles. Proteomics. 2006;6:1856–1866. [PubMed]

11. Bernadac A, Gavioli M, Lazzaroni J-C, Raina S, Lloubes R. Escherichia coli tol-pal mutants form outer membrane vesicles. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:4872–4878. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

12. Henry T, Pommier S, Journet L, Bernadac A, Gorvel JP, et al. Improved methods for producing outer membrane vesicles in Gram-negative bacteria. Res Microbiol. 2004;155:437–446. [PubMed]

13. Berlanda Scorza F, Doro F, Rodriguez-Ortega MJ, Stella M, Liberatori S, et al. Proteomics characterization of outer membrane vesicles from the extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli ΔtolR IHE3034 mutant. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7:473–485. [PubMed]

14. Bergman MA, Cummings LA, Rassoulian Barrett SL, Smith KD, Lara JC, et al. CD4⁺ T cells and Toll-like receptors recognize Salmonella antigens expressed in bacterial surface organelles. Infect Immun. 2005;73:1350–1356. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

15. Alaniz RC, Deatherage BL, Lara JC, Cookson BT. Membrane vesicles are immunogenic facsimiles of Salmonella typhimurium that potently activate dendritic cells, prime B and T cell responses, and stimulate protective immunity in vivo. J Immunol. 2007;179:7692–7701. [PubMed]

16. Keenan JI, Rijpkema SG, Durrani Z, Roake JA. Differences in immunogenicity and protection in mice and guinea pigs following intranasal immunization with Helicobacter pylori outer membrane antigens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;36:199–205. [PubMed]

17. Schild S, Nelson EJ, Camilli A. Immunization with Vibrio cholerae outer membrane vesicles induces protective immunity in mice. Infect Immun. 2008;76:4554–4563. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

18. Schild S, Nelson EJ, Bishop AL, Camilli A. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae outer membrane vesicles as a candidate vaccine for cholera. Infect Immun. 2009;77:472–484. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

19. Koeberling O, Seubert A, Granoff DM. Bactericidal antibody responses elicited by a meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine with overexpressed factor H-binding protein and genetically attenuated endotoxin. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:262–270. [PubMed]

20. Camacho AI, de Souza J, Sanchez-Gomez S, Pardo-Ros M, Irache JM, et al. Mucosal immunization with Shigella flexneri outer membrane vesicles induced protection in mice. Vaccine. 2011;29:8222–8229. [PubMed]

21. d’Hauteville H, Khan S, Maskell DJ, Kussak A, Weintraub A, et al. Two msbB genes encoding maximal acylation of lipid A are required for invasive Shigella flexneri to mediate inflammatory rupture and destruction of the intestinal epithelium. Journal of Immunology. 2002;168:5240–5251. [PubMed]

22. Nichols WA, Raetz CRH, Clementz T, Smith AL, Hanson JA, et al. htrB of Haemophilus influenzae: determination of biochemical activity and effects on virulence and lipooligosaccharide toxicity. Journal of Endotoxin Research. 1997;4:163–172.

23. Somerville JE, Cassiano L, Bainbridge B, Cunningham MD, Darveau RP. A novel Escherichia coli lipid a mutant that produces an antiinflammatory lipopolysaccharide. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1996;97:359–365. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

24. van der Ley P, Steeghs L, Hamstra HJ, ten Hove J, Zomer B, et al. Modification of lipid A biosynthesis in Neisseria meningitidis lpxL mutants: Influence on lipopolysaccharide structure, toxicity, and adjuvant activity. Infection and Immunity. 2001;69:5981–5990. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

25. Formal SB, Kent TH, May HC, Palmer A, Falkow S, et al. Protection of monkeys against experimental shigellosis with a living attenuated oral polyvalent dysentery vaccine. J Bacteriol. 1966;92:17–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

26. Sandlin RC, Lampel KA, Keasler SP, Goldberg MB, Stolzer AL, et al. Avirulence of rough mutants of Shigella flexneri - requirement of O antigen for correct unipolar localization of IcsA in the bacterial outer membrane. Infection and Immunity. 1995;63:229–237. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

27. Derbise A, Lesic B, Dacheux D, Ghigo JM, Carniel E. A rapid and simple method for inactivating chromosomal genes in Yersinia. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38:113–116. [PubMed]

28. Taylor LA, Rose RE. A correction in the nucleotide sequence of the Tn903 kanamycin resistance determinant in pUC4K. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:358. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

29. Chaveroche M-K, Ghigo J-M, d’Enfert C. A rapid method for efficient gene replacement in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:E97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

30. Trieu-Cuot P, Poyart-Salmeron C, Carlier C, Courvalin P. Nucleotide sequence of the erythromycin resistance gene of the conjugative transposon Tn1545. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:3660. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

31. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:6640–6645. [PubMed]

32. Maxson ME, Darwin AJ. Identification of inducers of the Yersinia enterocolitica phage shock protein system and comparison to the regulation of the RpoE and Cpx extracytoplasmic stress responses. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4199–4208. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

33. Doherty NS, Littman BH, Reilly K, Swindell AC, Buss JM, et al. Analysis of changes in acute-phase plasma proteins in an acute inflammatory response and in rheumatoid arthritis using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 1998;19:355–363. [PubMed]

34. Yu NY, Wagner JR, Laird MR, Melli G, Rey S, et al. PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1608–1615. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

35. Berven FS, Karlsen OA, Straume AH, Flikka K, Murrell JC, et al. Analysing the outer membrane subproteome of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) using proteomics and novel biocomputing tools. Arch Microbiol. 2006;184:362–377. [PubMed]

36. Jiang Y, Yang F, Zhang X, Yang J, Chen L, et al. The complete sequence and analysis of the large virulence plasmid pSS of Shigella sonnei. Plasmid. 2005;54:149–159. [PubMed]

37. Gilmour NJ, Donachie W, Sutherland AD, Gilmour JS, Jones GE, et al. Vaccine containing iron-regulated proteins of Pasteurella haemolytica A2 enhances protection against experimental pasteurellosis in lambs. Vaccine. 1991;9:137–140. [PubMed]

38. Kaneshige T, Yaguchi K, Ohgitani T. Siderophore receptor IroN is an important protective antigen against Salmonella infection in chickens. Avian Dis. 2009;53:563–567. [PubMed]

39. Pizza M, Scarlato V, Masignani V, Giuliani MM, Arico B, et al. Identification of vaccine candidates against serogroup B meningococcus by whole-genome sequencing. Science. 2000;287:1816–1820. [PubMed]

40. Adu-Bobie J, Lupetti P, Brunelli B, Granoff D, Norais N, et al. GNA33 of Neisseria meningitidis is a lipoprotein required for cell separation, membrane architecture, and virulence. Infection and Immunity. 2004;72:1914–1919. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

41. Chen DJ, Osterrieder N, Metzger SM, Buckles E, Doody AM, et al. Delivery of foreign antigens by engineered outer membrane vesicle vaccines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:3099–3104. [PubMed]

42. Sprong T, van der Ley P, Abdollahi-Roodsaz S, Joosten L, van der Meer J, et al. Neisseria meningitidis lipid A mutant LPSs function as LPS antagonists in humans by inhibiting TLR 4-dependent cytokine production. Innate Immun. 2011;17:517–525. [PubMed]

43. Ying T, Wang H, Li M, Wang J, Wang J, et al. Immunoproteomics of outer membrane proteins and extracellular proteins of Shigella flexneri 2a 2457T. Proteomics. 2005;5:4777–4793. [PubMed]

44. Somerville JE, Jr, Cassiano L, Darveau RP. Escherichia coli msbB gene as a virulence factor and a therapeutic target. Infect Immun. 1999;67:6583–6590. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of
Public Library of Science