PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcgeriBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Geriatrics
 
BMC Geriatr. 2012; 12: 13.
Published online Mar 29, 2012. doi:  10.1186/1471-2318-12-13
PMCID: PMC3368768
Validation of the spiritual distress assessment tool in older hospitalized patients
Stefanie Monod,corresponding author1 Estelle Martin,1 Brenda Spencer,2 Etienne Rochat,1,3 and Christophe Büla1
1Service of Geriatric Medicine & Geriatric Rehabilitation, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
2Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Bugnon 17, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
3Chaplaincy Service, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Stefanie Monod: Stefanie.monod-zorzi/at/chuv.ch; Estelle Martin: estelle.martin/at/statelite.ch; Brenda Spencer: brenda.spencer/at/chuv.ch; Etienne Rochat: Etienne.rochat/at/chuv.ch; Christophe Büla: Christophe.bula/at/chuv.ch
Received September 30, 2011; Accepted March 29, 2012.
Abstract
Background
The Spiritual Distress Assessment Tool (SDAT) is a 5-item instrument developed to assess unmet spiritual needs in hospitalized elderly patients and to determine the presence of spiritual distress. The objective of this study was to investigate the SDAT psychometric properties.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was performed in a Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit. Patients (N = 203), aged 65 years and over with Mini Mental State Exam score ≥ 20, were consecutively enrolled over a 6-month period. Data on health, functional, cognitive, affective and spiritual status were collected upon admission. Interviews using the SDAT (score from 0 to 15, higher scores indicating higher distress) were conducted by a trained chaplain. Factor analysis, measures of internal consistency (inter-item and item-to-total correlations, Cronbach α), and reliability (intra-rater and inter-rater) were performed. Criterion-related validity was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp) and the question "Are you at peace?" as criterion-standard. Concurrent and predictive validity were assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), occurrence of a family meeting, hospital length of stay (LOS) and destination at discharge.
Results
SDAT scores ranged from 1 to 11 (mean 5.6 ± 2.4). Overall, 65.0% (132/203) of the patients reported some spiritual distress on SDAT total score and 22.2% (45/203) reported at least one severe unmet spiritual need. A two-factor solution explained 60% of the variance. Inter-item correlations ranged from 0.11 to 0.41 (eight out of ten with P < 0.05). Item-to-total correlations ranged from 0.57 to 0.66 (all P < 0.001). Cronbach α was acceptable (0.60). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were high (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.96). SDAT correlated significantly with the FACIT-Sp, "Are you at peace?", GDS (Rho -0.45, -0.33, and 0.43, respectively, all P < .001), and LOS (Rho 0.15, P = .03). Compared with patients showing no severely unmet spiritual need, patients with at least one severe unmet spiritual need had higher odds of occurrence of a family meeting (adjOR 4.7, 95%CI 1.4-16.3, P = .02) and were more often discharged to a nursing home (13.3% vs 3.8%; P = .027).
Conclusions
SDAT has acceptable psychometrics properties and appears to be a valid and reliable instrument to assess spiritual distress in elderly hospitalized patients.
Articles from BMC Geriatrics are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central