PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 30.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3368379
NIHMSID: NIHMS381873

Filamin A Regulates Neural Progenitor Proliferation and Cortical Size through Wee1-Dependent Cdk1 Phosphorylation

Abstract

Cytoskeleton-associated proteins play key roles not only in regulating cell morphology and migration but also in proliferation. Mutations in the cytoskeleton-associated gene filamin A (FlnA) cause the human disorder periventricular heterotopia (PH). PH is a disorder of neural stem cell development that is characterized by disruption of progenitors along the ventricular epithelium and subsequent formation of ectopic neuronal nodules. FlnA-dependent regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics is thought to direct neural progenitor migration and proliferation. Here we show that embryonic FlnA null mice exhibited a reduction in brain size, and decline in neural progenitor numbers over time. The drop in the progenitor population was not attributable to cell death or changes in premature differentiation, but to prolonged cell cycle duration. Suppression of FlnA led to prolongation of the entire cell cycle length, principally in M-phase. FlnA loss impaired degradation of cyclin b1-related proteins, thereby delaying the onset and progression through mitosis. We found that the cdk1 kinase Wee1 bound FlnA, demonstrated increased expression levels after loss of FlnA function, and was associated with increased phosphorylation of cdk1. Phosphorylation of cdk1 inhibited activation of the anaphase promoting complex degradation system, which was responsible for cyclin b1 degradation and progression through mitosis. Collectively, our results demonstrate a molecular mechanism whereby FlnA loss impaired G2 to M phase entry, leading to cell cycle prolongation, compromised neural progenitor proliferation, and reduced brain size.

Introduction

Neural progenitor proliferation and brain size are principally modulated by two major cell parameters, cell cycle length and early differentiation (Kintner, 2002; Cremisi et al., 2003; Dehay and Kennedy, 2007; Farkas and Huttner, 2008). In mouse brain, corticogenesis begins at E11 and ends at E18 (Takahashi et al., 1995). During this period, neuroepithelial progenitors in the ventricular zone go through approximately 11 cell cycles, and in each cycle, a fraction of the progenitor population will differentiate into intermediate progenitors (referred to as basal progenitors) or directly exit the cell cycle to become post-mitotic neurons (Takahashi et al., 1996). Therefore, an increase in pre-mature neural progenitor differentiation can compromise the expansion of the neural progenitor pool, resulting in impaired neurogenesis, and subsequently microcephaly (Miyata et al.; Cremisi et al., 2003). Conversely, cell cycle length can also impact the size of the progenitor pool (Miyata et al.; Ohnuma and Harris, 2003). A prolonged cell cycle would proportionally inhibit the generation of both progenitors and neurons over a defined period of time, yielding fewer cortical neurons (Ohnuma and Harris, 2003). The precise interplay between cell cycle rate and the differentiating fraction of neural progenitors will direct neural progenitor proliferation, and finally determine brain size.

Neural progenitor progression through the various stages of the cell cycle (G1, Synthesis (S), G2 and Mitosis (M) phases, with postmitotic neurons exiting the cell cycle at G0) are mediated by cdk kinases and their activators, cyclin-related proteins (Murray and Kirschner, 1989; Leise and Mueller, 2002). For example, the cdk1/cyclinb1 complex is inactive prior to entry into M phase owing to Wee1/Pkmyt1 kinase-regulated cdk1 phosphorylation (Gould and Nurse, 1989). To enter M phase, progenitor cells activate cdk1/cyclinb1 through cdk1 dephosphorylation in part through degradation of Wee1-like kinases (Watanabe et al., 2004; Okamoto and Sagata, 2007). M phase progression is further enhanced by the cdc25c phosphatase (Lew and Kornbluth, 1996). Cdk1 activation also enhances cyclinb1 degradation through activation of the anaphase promoting complex (APC) system, involving cdh1 and cdc20 (Rudner and Murray, 2000; Golan et al., 2002). As cells proceed into metaphase, APC-regulated cyclinb1 degradation begins to inhibit cdk1 activation (dephosphorylation) (Visintin et al., 1997). In an analogous fashion, cdk inhibitors, such as the Cdk inhibitor p16, inhibit cdk4/6 interactions with cyclin d, thereby blocking the G1-S phase transition and possible exit from the cell cycle. Disruption of the cyclins, cdk kinases, or components of the APC system can delay progression through the various cell cycle stages.

During human cortical development, mutations in the FLNA gene cause a malformation of cortical development, periventricular heterotopia (PH) (Fox et al., 1998; Sheen et al., 2005). PH is characterized by a disruption of neural progenitors along the ventricular neuroepithelium, leading to ectopic neuronal nodules along the lateral ventricles and reduced brain size. Cytoskeleton-related genes have been found to play a crucial role in controlling brain size (bond et al., 1996). However, the underlying molecular mechanism whereby FLNA regulates neural progenitor development, giving rise to these neuropathological phenotypes is not known.

Materials and Methods

Mice

The Dilp2 mouse strain was obtained from the Comparative and Developmental Genetics Dept. MRC Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. The Dilp2 strain has been submitted to the European Mouse Mutant Archive (http://www.emmanet.org/) strain number EM: 00387 (Hart et al., 2006). The Dilp2 mouse strain is C3H/HeN background and Dilp2 embryos usually die before E15.5. To prolong the survival period of FlnA-null embryos, we crossbred Dilp2 female mice with wild-type (WT) S129/Sv male mice, which permitted us to observe FlnA function at later ages. In the current work, we only characterized FlnA effect on brain development until E18 due to the limits on the survival period of FlnA-null embryos. FlnA function on progenitor proliferation might also influence neurogenesis after this time period of normal corticogenesis.

All mouse studies were performed under approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Albany Medical College in accordance with The National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

BrdU labeling in vivo

BrdU (Roche) was dissolved in sterile PBS at a concentration of 6 mg/ml. BrdU injection was performed as previously described (Ferland et al., 2009). Briefly, for cumulative Brdu labeling, E14 pregnant mice were injected intra-peritoneally with BrdU (60mg/kg body weight) at 3-h intervals and sacrificed at varied time points, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 14 h; for mitotic index labeling. Other E14 pregnant mice were injected once with Brdu and scarified at 1.5- and 2-h intervals. For analysis of proliferation and differentiation, E14.5 and E17 pregnant mice were injected once intra-peritoneally with BrdU (100mg/kg) and were sacrificed after a 24-h interval. For S-phase cell labeling, E15.5 pregnant mice were pulse-labeled with BrdU for 20 min. All the embryos were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for BrdU immunohistochemistry as previously described (Ferland et al., 2009). Prior reports have suggested that BrdU may be cytotoxic and potentially affect mitogenesis, especially when administered at very high doses. However, under our experimental conditions, we did not observe the toxic effect of BrdU on cell growth, as seen by TUNEL staining (figure 2). In addition, the in vitro assays were performed without Brdu labeling and also indicate that FlnA loss prolongs the duration of M phase in FlnA-null cells.

Figure 2
Reduction in the neural progenitor population with loss of FlnA function at embryonic day 18

Cell culture

Neuronal progenitors were isolated from the E13.5 mouse embryo cortex as previously described (Sheen et al., 2006). Briefly, for neural progenitor isolation, E13.5 embryo cortices were miscroscopically dissected to separate the telencephalon from the basal ganglia. The tissue was triturated in Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) buffer, digested at 37°C in Earle's balanced salt solution (EBSS) containing papain (20 units/ml; Worthington Biochemical) for 10-20 min. The undigested tissue chunks were allowed to settle for 2-5 min, and the suspended cells were filtered through a cell strainer (BD Falcon). Dissociated cells were then re-suspended in knockout DMEM/F12 medium, a neural progenitor culture medium (Invitrogen). For neural sphere growth, the cells were cultured in suspension in tissue culture flasks (BD Falcon, Cat. No: 353108). M2 and A7 cell lines (a gift from Dr. T. Stossel) were cultured in minimum essential MEM medium supplemented with 2% FBS, 8% newborn calf serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. In addition, G418 (final concentration 500 μg/ml) was added to A7 cell culture medium to maintain FLNA expression (Cunningham et al., 1992).

For the assays involving cell proliferation or drug administration, the cells were plated on 5-10 μg/cm2 laminin I (Trevigen, Cat. 3400-010-01)-coated 6-cm dishes at a density of 5×104 cells/cm2. Neural progenitor doubling time was calculated by cell count. For flow cytometric analysis, neural progenitors were pulse-labeled with BrdU (10 μM) for 40 min, and then washed twice with HBSS and continued to culture in neural progenitor medium for varied time points. Cells were digested with trypsin, centrifuged, re-suspended in HBSS and then fixed with 4% PFA. For examination of cell cycle progression from G2/M to G1 phase, cultured neural progenitors were synchronized at G2/M phase by a treatment of 40 ng/ml nocodazole (Cat. M1404, Sigma Aldrich) for 12-16 h, and then released to continue cell cycle progression. At varied time points, cells were digested and fixed for flow cytometry or western blot. For protein degradation studies, cultured neural progenitors were harvested for western blot analyses after incubation in 100μM cycloheximide (Cat. C1988, Sigma Aldrich) for varying lengths of time.

Flow cytometry

For BrdU-labeled neural progenitors, cell staining was performed according to manufacturer's protocols with minor modifications (FITC BrdU Flow Kit, cat. 559619, BD Pharmingen, San Diego). Briefly, PFA-fixed cells were treated with DNase I to expose BrdU epitopes and incubated with anti-BrdU antibody (1:100, Calbiochem, cat. NA61) and Alexa fluor 488 secondary antibody (1:300); total DNA was stained with 7-AAD. The flow cytometry experiments were performed using a LASER SORP LSRII.

For propidium iodide (PI) staining, cells were re-suspended in HBSS and fixed by gently dropping into cold 100% ethanol (-20 °C). The cells were centrifuged and re-suspended in 0.5ml of DNA staining solution (50 ug/ml PI and 0.5 mg/ml RNAse A in PBS). FACS analysis was performed using a LASER SORP LSRII.

Tissue and cell processing for immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry

Timed murine embryos (E14.5, E15.5, and E18) were harvested from pregnant dams according to IACUC guidelines. Processing of tissue for preparation of frozen and paraffin sections and routine histological staining was performed according to previously described procedures (Ferland et al., 2006; Ferland et al., 2009). For immunohistochemistry, sections were blocked in PBS containing 5% donkey serum, and then incubated overnight using the appropriate primary antibodies. For FlnA staining, paraffin sections were stained by rabbit anti-FLNA monoclonal antibody (1:300, Epitomics, cat. 2242-1). For BrdU staining, tissue sections were retrieved by heating at 95-100°C in citrate buffer for 15-20 min, and then quickly put into ambient distilled water to denature the DNA, or alternate sections were slowly cooled and treated with DNAse I to cleave chromosomal DNA. The following antibodies with corresponding dilutions were used for the studies: mouse anti-BrdU (1:100, Calbiochem) and rat anti-BrdU (1:150, Serotec, cat. MCA2060), rabbit anti-Ki-67 monoclonal antibody (1:200, Epitomics, cat. 4203-1), rabbit anti-PH3 polyclonal antibody (1:250, Millipore cat: 06-570), rabbit anti-Sox2 (1:250, Epitomics, cat. 2683-1), mouse anti-Reelin (1:50, Developmental Studies Hybridoma bank, cat. R4B), mouse anti-CSPG (1:200, Sigma Aldrich cat. c8035), rabbit anti-Tbr-1 and anti-Tbr-2 (1:150, Abcam, cat. ab31940, ab23345), mouse anti-actin (1:100, Santa Cruz, sc-47778), mouse anti-beta-catenin and anti-N-cadherin (1:100, BD Biosciences, cat. c19220 and 610920), mouse monoclonal antibody against phospho-FLNA (ser2152) (1:150) were a kind gift from F. Nakamura (Stossel lab). Following incubation in primary antibody, tissue sections were washed and treated with the appropriate secondary antibodies for two h. The following secondary antibodies were used: dye 488 and dye 594 donkey anti-mouse antibodies (1:200), and dye 488 and dye 594 donkey anti-rabbit antibodies (1:200) from Jackson Immunoresearch. For F-actin staining, Alexa fluor 488 or rhodamine-labeled phalloidin was used on frozen sections (dissolved in 1.5ml methanol, 1:50, Invitrogen cat. A12379 and R415). Fluorescent microscopy images were obtained using the Olympus AX70 microscope with a SNAP microphotographic system. Confocal images were obtained using a Zeiss laser scanning microscope LSM 510.

For cellular staining of FlnA, Wee1, Pkmyt1, cdc25c and cyclinb1, cells were fixed using ice-cold 10% (w/V) tri-chloroaectic acid (TCA) for 20 minutes, washed >3 times using PBS and permeabilized by 0.2% triton-X100 (Yonemura et al., 2004). For other antibody staining, cells were fixed by 4% PFA and permeabilized by triton-x100. Cell staining procedure was the same as that used in tissue staining. The following antibodies were used for cell staining: rabbit anti-FLNA (1:250, Epitomics, cat. 2242-1), mouse anti-FLNA (1:100, Santa Cruz, cat. sc-58764), mouse and rabbit anti-Wee1 (1:50, Santa Cruz cat. sc-5285 and sc-325), rabbit anti-Pkmyt1 (1:100, Epitomics cat. 3303-1), mouse anti-aurora b (AIM-1, 1:100, BD Bioscience, cat. 611082), mouse and rabbit anti-cyclinb1 (1:100, Santa Cruz cat. sc-245 and sc-752), mouse and rabbit anti-cdc25c (1:100, Santa Cruz cat. sc-55513 and sc-327). Secondary antibodies were the same as above for tissue staining.

Endogenous co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and western blot analyses

For co-immunoprecipitation, neural progenitor cells were grown to 70-80% confluence on laminin-coated dishes and synchronized by nocodazole treatment. Cells were lysed in a co-immunoprecipitation buffer (50mM Tris-HCl pH7.4, 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X-100, 1 mM Na3VO4, 2mM EDTA, 1mM PMSF, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 3 (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.p0044) and proteinase-inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich cat. p8340)). Cell lysates were centrifuged at 132,000 rpm for 15 min and the supernatants were incubated at 4°C with 8μg of protein A/G beads-coupled anti-Wee1 (Santa Cruz, cat. sc-5285), cyclinb1 (Santa Cruz, cat. sc-245), or anti-pan 14-3-3 (Santa Cruz, sc-629) antibodies for 3 h. The beads were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 1 min and washed with co-IP buffer for 3 times. Beads were boiled in SDS-PAGE sample loading buffer for western blot. For co-IP, A7 melanoma cells were cultured to 70-80% confluence and then synchronized by nocodazole treatment. Cells were lysed as above and the supernatants were incubated with protein A/G beads-coupled anti-FLNA (Santa Cruz, cat. sc-58764), anti-Wee1, or anti-pan 14-3-3 antibodies.

For western blot experiments, protein samples were loaded onto 8-12% SDS-PAGE gels for electrophoresis, and transferred onto PVDF membrane (Bio-rad, cat.162-0177). Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, and with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:3000, Jackson Immunoresearch) for 2 hours. Signals were detected using LumiGOLD ECL detection kit (Signagen Laboratories, cat. SL100309). The following primary antibodies were used: α-tubulin (1:2000, Santa Cruz, cat. 32293), integrin β1 (1:1000, BD Bioscience, cat.610467), FLNA (1:10000, Epitomics cat. 2242-1), FLNA (1:1000, Santa Cruz cat. sc-58764), PH3 (1:2000, same as immunostaining), cdc20 (1:500, Santa Cruz, cat. sc-8385 and sc-13162), cdh1 (1:500, Santa Cruz, cat. sc-56312), cyclinb1 (1:500, same as above), cdk1(1:1000, Calbiochem, pc25), phospho-cdk1 (pY-15) (1:500, BD Biosciences cat.612306), Wee1 (1:500, same as above), cdc25c (1:500, Santa Cruz, cat. sc-327 and sc-55513), cdc25c (1:500, Epitomics, cat.1302), and Pkymt1 (1:1000, Epitomics, cat.3303).

Pull-down assay

FLNA c-terminal (aa2167-aa2647, protein code: P21333 on NCBI website) was inserted into the prokaryotic expression vector pGEX-6p-3 through restriction enzymatic digestion. GST-FLNA-C protein was expressed in BL21 bacteria and purified through GSH-Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare, cat. 17-0756-01). Endogenous Wee1 was pulled-down through incubation of purified GST-FLNA-C with A7 cell supernatants.

TUNEL staining

Cell death was detected by TUNEL staining (In situ cell death detection kit, Roche cat. 12156792910). The procedures followed the manufacturer's protocol.

Quantitative analysis

To quantify the number of positively labeled cells on serial tissue sections, cell number was quantified using ImageJ software (NIH). Three coronal sections of one FlnA-null brain were compared to 3 homotopic sections of one FlnA-WT brain in a same litter. A total of more than 4 sets of experimental and control E18 embryonic brains were used for analyses (i.e. ≥4 FlnA-WT brains and ≥4 FlnA–null brains), and 3 sets for E15.5 embryo brains. Data are represented as the mean (n≥4 for E18 and =3 for E15.5) ± STDEV for BrdU, Ki-67, PH3, Tbr-1, Tbr-2 and Sox2. P value was calculated by Excel software. Significance was determined using a paired Student's T-test.

Cortex thickness was measured from digitized images using imaging software (Adobe Photoshop). The thickness of FlnA-null brain cortex was reported as a relative value to that of FlnA-WT brain cortex. Mean values, STDEV and T-test (p value) were calculated by Excel software.

To quantify western blot results, the band intensity for a given sample was digitized, and quantified using ImageJ (NIH) software. Greater than 3 replicates were performed for each set of experiments. For temporal studies, the intensity of bands at time zero was arbitrarily set as 100, and the intensity value of other bands at other time points is reported as a relative value to that the zero time point measurement.

Results

Loss of FlnA function leads to microcephaly in embryonic mice

While FlnA has been proposed to affect corticogenesis, the underlying pathological mechanisms have not been explored. We therefore characterized the embryonic development of C3H/HeN X S129/SV Dilp2 mice. These mutant mice harbor a T to A point mutation in the FlnA gene, leading to a stop codon in exon 46, nonsense-mediated decay of the FlnA mRNA, and undetectable FlnA protein levels using either N- (domain 4) or C-terminal (last domain) FlnA antibodies (data available when required), consistent with prior reports(Hart et al., 2006) The FlnAy/- embryos displayed a smaller physical body size compared to age-matched WT controls (Fig. 1a), developed midline omphalocoeles, and were embryonic lethal after E18. FlnAy/- brain size was also reduced both in the rostral-caudal extent and in the width of the telencephalon (Fig. 1b), and the cortex was significantly thinned at E15.5 (9% reduction) and E18 (15% reduction) compared to FlnAy/+ brain (Fig. 1c, 1d). At higher magnification, loss of cortical width was most prominent in the cortical plate (Fig. 1d). FlnA was highly expressed in the ventricular (VZ) and subventricular (SVZ) zones of the cerebral cortex, regions populated by proliferating neural progenitors during mid-gestation (Fig. 1e), whereas FlnA expression was reduced in the upper cortical layers, where post-migratory neurons were situated. The phenotype of smaller brains and loss of cortical width in FlnAy/- embryos, as well as prominent FlnA expression along the VZ/SVZ, suggested that FlnA might play a functional role in regulating progenitor pool size during cortical development.

Figure 1
FlnA-/- mice display mild microcephaly, omphalocele formation, and an overall reduction in body size

Decreased neural progenitor pool size in embryonic FlnAy/- mice

To address whether the reduction in brain size was due to altered progenitor development, we used markers for cell proliferation as surrogates for determining the progenitor pool size (Figs. 2 and and33). The Ki-67 antigen labels all cells in the cell cycle (G1, S, G2 and M phases), but not those exiting the cycle, such as differentiated progenitors and newly born neurons. The number of Ki-67-positive neural progenitors was significantly decreased by 28.2% and 13.4% in E18 (Fig. 2) and E15.5 (Fig. 3) FlnAy/- cortices, respectively, compared to WT controls (n>3, **= p < 0.01, ***= p < 0.001). Moreover, fewer Ki67+ progenitors were seen both in the VZ as well as the intermediate zone (IZ) where secondary progenitors reside. We similarly observed a decline in progenitor numbers along the ventricular lining, as evidenced by phospho-histone H3 (PH3) staining, an M-phase marker. The E18 (Fig. 2) and E15.5 (Fig. 3) FlnAy/- cortices showed a 25% and 9.2% decline, respectively, in the number of PH3+ progenitors compared to WT controls (n>3, *= p < 0.05, ***= p < 0.001). Furthermore, pulsing with the thymidine analog, BrdU, captured progenitors entering S-phase. Loss of FlnA resulted in a 31% and 15% decrease in the BrdU+ cell number, respectively, in E18 and E15.5 cortices 24 h after BrdU pulse labeling (n>3, **= p < 0.01, ***= p < 0.001). Again, fewer progenitors were seen in both the VZ/SVZ and IZ (white brackets). Lastly, the diminished brain size in the FlnAy/- mice was not the result of increased cell death, as evidenced by the absence of any significant increase in TUNEL staining in comparison of FlnAy/- to FlnAy/+ cortices of E18 and E15.5 brains. Summarily, our data indicated that the reduction in brain size seen with loss of FlnA was, in part, due to a decline in the progenitor pool.

Figure 3
Early decline in the neural progenitor population in E15.5 FlnAy/- cortex

FlnA-dependent defects in progenitor pool size are not a result of an increased differentiation of neural progenitors

During the development of the cerebral cortex, neural progenitors undergo both self-duplication and neuronal differentiation. The balance between these processes regulates neural progenitor's proliferation and brain size. To explore a possible role for FlnA in cell fate specification, we first quantified the number of neural cells expressing several layer specific markers relative to the number of Sox2+ progenitor cells in E15 and E18 FlnAy/- and FlnAy/+ cortices. If early onset differentiation increased, earlier formed layers (subplate/preplate, marginal zone or deep cortical layer neurons) would be expected to be increased in width compared to later-formed superficial cortical layers, composed of later born neurons. The reelin antigen labels Cajal-Retzius neurons in the marginal zone, whereas chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) is found in subplate and intermediate neurons. A slight decrease in the layer thickness for both early markers was seen in the FlnAy/- brain, suggesting that FlnA loss might actually lead to a reduction in early differentiation of neural progenitors (Fig. 4a). We next examined two additional layer markers: Tbr-2, a differentiating intermediate progenitor marker, and Tbr-1, a marker of earlier born neurons located in deeper layers of the cortical plate. The number of Tbr-2 positive cells relative to the number of Sox2 positive progenitors was reduced by 4.2% in the FlnAy/- E18 cortex compared to WT control (Fig. 4b, c and d). Likewise, the number of Tbr-1 positive cells relative to the number of Sox2 positive progenitors was decreased by 5.5% in FlnAy/- cortex compared to FlnAy/+ cortex. These results would further imply that loss of FlnA resulted in a decrease in progenitor differentiation.

Figure 4
Diminished brain size in null FlnA mice is not due to an increase in neural differentiation

Another measure of proliferation versus differentiation can be made through dual labeling studies using Ki-67 and BrdU (Fig. 4b, c and d). Pulsed injection of BrdU labels progenitors undergoing cell division at a particular instance in time. Secondary labeling with Ki-67 at 24h post BrdU injection captures a subset of BrdU+ cells that remain progenitors, as opposed to the Ki-67- and BrdU+ cells that have exited the cell cycle and adopted post-mitotic neuronal fates. We observed fewer BrdU+ progenitors situated above the ventricular zone (brackets referring to the intermediate zone in Figs. 2, ,33) in FlnAy/- cortex as compared to FlnAy/+ cortex, suggestive of slower or delayed differentiation. Additionally, a greater proportion of BrdU+ and Ki-67+ labeled cells were seen in the FlnAy/- mice (37% vs 34% in FlnAy/- E18 brain; n>3, *= p < 0.05, **= p < 0.01), indicating again a decline in differentiation. Finally, co-staining with Tuj1, a neuronal marker, revealed an increased proportion of Tuj1 to Sox2 cells in the FlnAy/- cortices as compared to WT (data available when required). These findings also indicated that early differentiation was not the cause of the reduction in proliferation observed above in FlnAy/- mice. Similar, albeit less pronounced changes were seen in the analysis of the E15.5 FlnAy/- cortex (data available when required). Taken together, the decline in progenitor pool numbers, due to loss of FlnA, was not derived from a premature-onset differentiation of neural progenitors.

Loss of FlnA prolongs cell cycle progression and delays G2/M to G1 phase transition

One possible mechanism that could account for the reduction in neural progenitor numbers would be a role for FlnA in regulating the cell cycle. Given that phenotypic changes due to loss of FlnA might not be apparent until later in development (i.e., E15.5 and E18), we performed in vivo pulse BrdU labeling for 1.5 and 2h, and cumulative BrdU labeling for 2, 3, 9 and 14h in E14 embryos to analyze loss of FlnA effects on the cell cycle (Fig. 5). The percentage of BrdU+ cells with respect to the total number of cells in the ventricular zone (labeling index, LI; the maximal LI is 1 when all the cells are BrdU-positive) was quantified by counting the number of BrdU+ cells in a defined region of mediodorsal frontal cortex. Similar to the previously reported control data (Takahashi et al., 1993), LI in FlnAy/+ cortices was 0.42±0.01, 0.46±0.02, 0.85±0.015 and 0.97±0.01, respectively, for 2-, 3-, 9-, and 14-h cumulative BrdU labeling (Fig. 5). In contrast, LI in FlnAy/- cortex was significantly reduced to 0.43±0.02, 0.75±0.025, respectively, for 3- and 9-h BrdU labeling, but unchanged for 2- and 14-hour cumulative labeling (Fig. 5). A linear fit plot of LI as a function of labeling time allowed for determination of the duration for each cell cycle phase. By 14-h, the number of BrdU+ cells in either WT or mutant mouse had reached a maximal plateau. From the plot, Tc (the whole cell cycle length) - Ts (S-phase length) corresponded to the minimal time necessary to reach the maximal LI (10.8 h for FlnAy/+ cells versus 12.9 h for FlnAy/- cells). Ts could be determined from the relative ratio of the LI for Ts versus Tc (Ts/ Tc=0.28/GF). Thus, FlnA loss caused an increase of the whole cell cycle length Tc to 17.9 h vs 15.1 h in WT and an increase in S-phase length Ts to 5 h, (FlnAy/-) compared to 4.3 h in WT. TG2+M (the length of G2- and M-phases) was measured from the minimum time required for all mitotic cells (PH3+) along the ventricular surface to become BrdU labeled. After a 1.5 h interval, 74% and 68% of PH3+ cells were BrdU-labeled along the FlnAy/+ and FlnAy/- ventricular surfaces, respectively (Fig. 5, BrdU/PH3 staining). By 2h, the mitotic labeling index increased to 98±2% for FlnAy/+ cells and to 90±2% for FlnAy/- cells. Therefore, for FlnAy/+ mitotic cells, the maximal LI was achieved within 2h (TG2+M for WT), whereas the time interval for the maximal LI was interpolated to be 2.3 h (TG2+M) for FlnAy/- mitotic cells, assuming a linear rate of LI ascent after 2 h. TG1 (G1 phase length) could be calculated by TG1= Tc-Ts-TG2+M, and became 10.6 h in null FlnA mice, compared to 8.8 h for WT mice. Finally, M phase length was estimated by Tc X the ratio of M-phase cells to total cells in the ventricular zone (Fig. 5, PH3 staining). For FlnAy/+ PH3+ cells, the ratio was 0.043±0.004, giving an M phase length of 40 min (TM =0.66 h). In contrast, the ratio for FlnAy/- PH3+ cells was 0.063±0.005, and so M phase length was 66 min (TM =1.1 h). G2-phase length became 1.2 h in FlnAy/- mice as opposed to 1.34 h in WT mice. The duration of each phase of the cell cycle (TC, TG1, TS, TG2+M, TG2 and TM phases) lengths is summarized in Table 1. It is noteworthy that loss of FlnA affected every phase length in the cell cycle with the most significant changes arising in M-phase and G1 phase lengths, with 66% and 20% increases, respectively. Therefore, loss of FlnA function led to a prolonged cell cycle, resulting in an overall reduction in the number of progenitors generated.

Figure 5
FlnA loss causes a prolongation of cell cycle length in vivo
Table 1
Summary of cell cycle length changes due to loss of FlnA function

The cell cycle analyses in vivo prompted us to further characterize FlnA function and regulation of cell cycle in vitro. Consistent with the impaired proliferation seen in vivo, the doubling time of cultured E13.5 FlnAy/- neural progenitors was prolonged by more than 25% compared to that of FlnAy/+ progenitors (12.7h for FlnAy/+ cells vs 16.9h for FlnAy/- cells) (Fig. 6a,b). To better characterize the effects of FlnA suppression that was observed on cell cycle transitions from S to G1 phase, we again pulse labeled progenitors with BrdU for 40 min and used flow cytometry to examine progression through phases of the cell cycle (Fig. 6c, 0h). Slower cell cycle progression from S-phase to G1 phase was seen in the FlnAy/- progenitor population (see arrow in Fig. 6c). Given the above in vivo results (Table 1), we suspected that the slower S-G2/M-G1 phase transition of FlnAy/- progenitor might be due to an M-phase delay. We therefore synchronized the neural progenitors to the G2/M phase by nocodazole treatment and observed the cell cycle progression after nocodazole release by flow cytometry (Fig. 6d). More than 40% FlnAy/+ progenitors passed through M-phase to G1 phase within 1.5h, compared to less than 20% of the FlnAy/- progenitors (n>3, p≤0.001). The cell cycle progression of FlnAy/- progenitors was still delayed after 8h (Fig. 6d). Overall, these findings indicated that the neural progenitor proliferation defects seen following FlnA inhibition arose from a defect in cell cycle progression, principally from G2/M to G1 phase transition and secondarily from G1 phase.

Figure 6
FlnA regulates cell cycle progression from G2 to M phase

FlnA regulates cyclinb1 degradation through cdk1 Tyr15 phosphorylation in neural progenitors

To transition through the various phases of mitosis, neural progenitors entering metaphase must first inactivate cdk1 (through phosphorylation of cdk1) to initiate degradation of cyclinb1 through the APC system. Progression from metaphase to anaphase and anaphase to G1 is regulated by activators of the APC, cdh1 and cdc20. To address whether FlnA regulated cyclinb1 levels, we first examined the temporal course of cyclinb1 expression in both FlnAy/+ and FlnAy/- progenitors after nocodozole synchronization (time zero corresponding to G2/M entry phase). Cyclinb1 levels rapidly declined in FlnAy/+ cells as mitosis progressed over a 180-min time period, but the decline was significantly slower in the FlnAy/- cells (Fig. 7a). Both cdh1 and cdc20, which promoted cyclinb1 degradation through the APC system, however, also underwent significantly slower rates of clearance in the FlnAy/- progenitors compared to FlnAy/+ cells. To determine whether the slower rates of decline in the levels of expression for these proteins in FlnAy/- progenitors were due to impairments in protein degradation or increased protein synthesis, we examined the expression levels of cyclinb1 and cdc20 after addition of the protein synthesis inhibitor, cyclohexamide (Fig. 7b). Similar to the results from the nocodazole treatment studies, both proteins exhibited increased expression levels in the FlnAy/- progenitors compared to WT cells over time, indicating a disruption in the clearance of these cell cycle proteins. Cdc20 and cdh1 promote cyclinb1 degradation through the APC system. The expression levels of these APC regulators were actually increased but not decreased in FlnAy/- neural progenitors (Fig. 7c) suggesting that the impaired rate of cyclinb1 degradation was not attributable to either of these proteins and more likely, another molecule in the APC system.

Figure 7
FlnA impairs cyclin B degradation and inhibits cdk1 phosphorylation

With cyclinb1, cdk1 phosphorylates several target substrates that promote activation of the APC degradation system (Rudner and Murray, 2000; Golan et al., 2002). Cdk1 activation is regulated by binding to cyclinb1 and also inhibited by cdk1 phosphorylation at tyrosine (Tyr15). In FlnAy/- progenitors and FLNA-null M2 cells, we detected a significant (>3 fold) increase in cdk1 phosphorylation at Tyr15 site (Fig. 7c), suggesting that a greater proportion of cdk1 existed in the inactivated versus activated state in FlnA y/-- cells. Furthermore, cdk1 Tyr15 phosphorylation levels remained increased in FlnAy/- progenitors throughout the entire period of mitosis after nocodozole release (Fig. 7d), whereas cdk1 phosphorylation in FlnAy/+ progenitors abruptly decreased as mitosis progressed (Fig. 7d). Overall, these observations indicated that FlnA regulated cyclinb1 degradation by affecting the status of cdk1 Tyr15 phosphorylation in neural progenitors.

FlnA interacts with Wee1-like proteins in neural progenitors

To clarify the molecular mechanism by which FlnA regulated cdk1 inactivation via Tyr15 phosphorylation, we first addressed whether FlnA physically interacted with several regulators of cdk1 activity. Wee1 is conserved among all eukaryotes and phosphorylates Tyr15, whereas members of the cdc25 family are phosphatases, counteracting this activity. We could not demonstrate binding of FlnA to cyclinb1 or cdc25c (Fig. 8a, b). Compared with control co-immunoprecipitation, FlnA weakly interacted with the protein 14-3-3, a regulator of Wee1, (Fig. 8c) but significantly bound to Wee1 endogenously in both neural progenitors and FLNA-expressing A7 cells (Fig. 8d and e). We have previously observed that the FlnA C-terminal fragment bound to several proline-rich proteins (unpublished data), and Wee1 contain a proline-rich domain at the N-terminal. As expected, Wee1 was able to bind the C-terminal portion of FLNA, further suggesting that the actin binding protein interacted with Wee1 through the proline-rich region (Fig. 8f). Immunostaining showed overlapping FlnA and Wee1 expression at the cell membrane and peri-nuclear region (Fig. 8g). FLNA appeared to regulate the localization of Wee1 as FLNA suppression in the M2 cell leaded to a diffusion of Wee1 to the cytoplasm (Fig. 8h). Furthermore, Wee1 expression levels were higher in unsynchronized FlnAy/- cells (Fig. 8i, left two bands), and Wee1 degradation was slower in nocodazole-synchronized FlnAy/- cells as progenitors advanced through mitosis (Fig. 8i, right lanes). Our results suggested that FlnA regulated Wee1 stability and expression levels and thereby directed cdk1 phosphorylation and inactivation.

Figure 8
FlnA interacts with Wee1 to promote entry into M phase

DISCUSSION

FlnA interactions with trans-membrane receptors and actin provide for a variety of signaling pathways with which to regulate neural progenitor proliferation. For example, FlnA binds integrin β1, which is a cell adhesion receptor for extracellular matrix proteins like laminin, fibronectin and collagen (Loo et al., 1998). FlnA shares some common functional characteristics with integrins (Schwartz and Assoian, 2001; Aszodi et al., 2003; LaFlamme et al., 2008): (1) both promote proliferation through regulating cell cycle progression, particularly in M phase and in G1 phase; (2) they promote progenitor differentiation; and (3) they both regulate focal adhesion formation and stress fiber maturation (our unpublished observation). In this respect, FlnA might serve as a key bridge in the signal transduction between integrin and downstream molecules. Our current studies provided a possible signaling pathway, whereby integrin could regulate M phase progression. Integrin has been found to influence cytokinesis in chondrocytes. FlnA has also been reported to regulate cytokinesis during cell division (Playford et al., 2006), and our immunostaining for FlnA suggested that the protein was concentrated near the cleavage furrow and at the midbody (unpublished data). Alternatively, both FlnA and integrin have been implicated in G1 phase progression. FlnA has been reported to bind several downstream molecules of the ERK-MAPK pathway, such as Ras GTPase and MKK4 (Ohta et al., 1999; Sarkisian et al., 2006), and integrin has been found to promote G1 phase progression via the ERK pathway (Schwartz and Assoian, 2001; Aszodi et al., 2003). Thus, FlnA might also regulate G1 phase progression via the potential integrin-ERK pathway. Finally, FlnA binds and interacts with F-actin, and F-actin has also been reported to promote cell proliferation by regulating G1 phase progression (Huang et al., 2002). Interestingly, we do see a significant decrease in F-actin staining in the FlnA-null E18 brain (unpublished observation) and this loss would potentially influence G1 phase progression even if secondarily. Overall, the filamin family of actin binding proteins likely plays a complex regulatory role in maintenance and stabilization of various proteins involved in cell cycle regulation.

FlnA regulation of cyclinb1 degradation is a key factor for progression through mitosis once a cell enters metaphase. Our study found that the rate of cyclinb1 degradation in FlnA-null progenitors was significantly reduced, which could explain the delayed mitotic progression of FlnA-null progenitors. Prior studies have reported physical binding of FlnA to cyclinb1, leading to FlnA phosphorylation by cyclinb1-activated kinase cdk1 and the ability of FlnA to cross-link actin (Cukier et al., 2007). We did find that FlnA was highly phosphorylated in neural progenitors during G2/M phase, but were unable to confirm endogenous interactions between FlnA and cyclinb1 via bi-directional co-immunoprecipitation. Differences of sequence and structure between mouse FlnA and human FLNA may be in part responsible for this discrepancy. Alternatively, the prior work's findings may reflect non-physiologic interactions given the tendency for non-specific binding of the filamins and the reliance on over-expression of FLNA or cyclinb1 to demonstrate a physical interaction. Whether direct or indirect, both studies would suggest some shared role between FlnA and cyclinb1.

Various components in the APC system can regulate cyclinb1 degradation (Visintin et al., 1997). We found that the expression levels of both cdc20 and cdh1 (APC regulators that promote progression through metaphase to anaphase and anaphase to G1 as well as cyclinb1 degradation) in null FlnA progenitors were not decreased but increased, and their degradation rates were also slower, similar to that of cyclinb1. This observation suggested that a primary activation defect in the APC system might collectively lead to the slower degradation of cyclinb1, cdc20 and cdh1. Previous reports have demonstrated that phosphorylation of APC subunits by activated cdk1 or pilk1 leads to activation of the APC system (Rudner and Murray, 2000; Golan et al., 2002). Moreover, phosphorylation of cdk1 at amino acid sites theronine-14 and tyrosine-15 inactivates cdk1 (Gould and Nurse, 1989; Atherton-Fessler et al., 1993). We found that loss of FlnA promoted cdk1 phosphorylation on tyrosine-15 in neural progenitors and that phosphorylation levels remained elevated throughout mitosis, suggesting that cdk1 activity was inhibited throughout the mitotic cycle. We interpreted these findings to indicate that the delayed degradation of cyclinb1 seen after loss of FlnA and during mitosis was linked to a primary dysregulation of cdk1 phosphorylation.

Wee1-like family kinases, like Wee1 and Pkymt1, can phosphorylate cdk1 on tyrosine-15, whereas cdc25c family phosphatases with its partner protein 14-3-3 can dephosphorylate cdk1 at this site. Recently, FLNA was also reported to regulate entry into mitosis through cdc25c participation (Telles et al.). We could not identify any significant binding between FLNA and cdc25c. The difference in results from those reported likely is due to the fact that the prior work used either GST or over-expression studies through transfection to demonstrate binding between these two proteins. Additionally, we did not find any change in neural progenitor expression levels of cdc25c or 14-3-3 after FlnA suppression. We did, however, identify a weak interaction between FlnA and 14-3-3, suggesting that this pathway might still contribute to and promote entry into mitosis. More prominently, the expression of Wee1-like kinases in FlnA-null progenitors was increased compared to that in FlnA-WT progenitors. Our findings that FlnA endogenously co-immunoprecipitated with Wee1 indicated that FlnA likely regulates the levels of Wee1 protein in neural progenitors and this pathway led to the increased phosphorylation of cdk1 in FlnA-null progenitors. Given that Wee1 and Pkymt1 share similar proline rich domains and are expressed in neural progenitors, it is likely that Pkymt1 will be capable of binding FlnA. One possibility might be that FlnA regulates the degradation of these proteins through the ubiquitination system, given APC's role as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and FlnA interactions with members of the Skp, Cullin, F-box containing complex (SCF) pathway (unpublished observations). Further clarification of how FlnA regulates either Wee1 or Pkymt1 will need investigation.

The current studies demonstrate that loss of FlnA in mice does not lead to PH formation in the lateral ventricles of mice but rather a reduction in brain size. The mild microcephaly seen in the mice mirrors the human phenotype in males that harbor mutations in FLNA. The female heterozygous FlnA mice show a mild reduction in brain size but no heterotopia formation in the lateral ventricles. There has been a prior report of nodular formation in the third ventricles of null FlnA mice, although this appears to be an inconsistent finding (Adams et al., 2012). We observe a thinning in the neuroependymal lining of null FlnA mice but no PH formation (unpublished observations). The absence of PH may reflect the fact that the mice are late embryonic lethal and heterotopia formation may not yet have occurred at this stage of development. Alternatively, we have previously shown that disruption of the neuroependymal lining can lead to nodular heterotopia with loss of BIG2, the second gene mutation in humans that causes PH (unpublished observations and Ferland et al., 2009). In this context, it is possible that the mechanical stressors in the human neuroepithlium may be greater than that in the mouse and that loss of FlnA function alone is not sufficient to cause PH formation in mice. Finally, the observed microcephaly and thinning of the neuroependyma with loss of FlnA may extend from a common role for filamins in regulation of vesicle trafficking and therefore the turnover of cell surface and intracellular proteins. For example, loss of cell surface adhesion proteins such as integrins and cadherins would likely lead to weakening of the neuroependyma and disrupt progenitor proliferation through integrin-mediated cyclin activity. Additional studies will be required to understand this possible relationship.

While our findings demonstrate a novel role for actin-binding proteins in regulating the degradation of cell cycle-related proteins in the brain and giving rise to microcephaly, loss of FlnA function also influences the development of various other organ systems. FlnA appears to be involved in blood vessel and heart formation given the vasculopathy and valvular defects seen in the null mice. Suppression of this actin-binding protein also leads to midline closure defects involving the sternum and palate, suggesting a defect in skeletal formation. Additionally, development of omphalocele and observed shortening of the gut similarly implies a disruption in gastrointestinal development. Lastly, the null FlnA mouse exhibits an overall reduction in body size. Taken in total, these observations raise the possibility that FlnA function as it relates to cell cycle regulation of the neural progenitor pool may extend more broadly to other progenitors across various tissue and organ systems and thereby provide a general mechanism of function and action.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health NS063997-01 to VLS. This work was also supported in part by the Empire State Stem Cell Fund through the New York State Department of Health Contract #C024324 to RJF and VLS. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Empire State Stem Cell Board, the New York State Department of Health, or the State of New York. VLS is a Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Developmental Award Recipient. We thank Fumihiko Nakamura for the gift of anti-FLNA antibodies (1-7, and 4-4). We also thank Dr. Karina Tuz and Barbara Beyer.

Footnotes

Authors do not have Conflict of Interest.

REFERENCES

  • Adams M, Simms RJ, Abdelhamed Z, Dawe HR, Szymanska K, Logan CV, Wheway G, Pitt E, Gull K, Knowles MA, Blair E, Cross SH, Sayer JA, Johnson CA. A meckelin-filamin A interaction mediates ciliogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:1272–1286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Aszodi A, Hunziker EB, Brakebusch C, Fassler R. Beta1 integrins regulate chondrocyte rotation, G1 progression, and cytokinesis. Genes Dev. 2003;17:2465–2479. [PubMed]
  • Bond J, Woods CG. Cytoskeletal genes regulating brain size. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006;18:95–101. [PubMed]
  • Cremisi F, Philpott A, Ohnuma S. Cell cycle and cell fate interactions in neural development. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:26–33. [PubMed]
  • Cukier IH, Li Y, Lee JM. Cyclin B1/Cdk1 binds and phosphorylates Filamin A and regulates its ability to cross-link actin. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:1661–1672. [PubMed]
  • Cunningham CC, Gorlin JB, Kwiatkowski DJ, Hartwig JH, Janmey PA, Byers HR, Stossel TP. Actin-binding protein requirement for cortical stability and efficient locomotion. Science. 1992;255:325–327. [PubMed]
  • Dehay C, Kennedy H. Cell-cycle control and cortical development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:438–450. [PubMed]
  • Farkas LM, Huttner WB. The cell biology of neural stem and progenitor cells and its significance for their proliferation versus differentiation during mammalian brain development. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:707–715. [PubMed]
  • Ferland RJ, Gaitanis JN, Apse K, Tantravahi U, Walsh CA, Sheen VL. Periventricular nodular heterotopia and Williams syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140:1305–1311. [PubMed]
  • Ferland RJ, Batiz LF, Neal J, Lian G, Bundock E, Lu J, Hsiao YC, Diamond R, Mei D, Banham AH, Brown PJ, Vanderburg CR, Joseph J, Hecht JL, Folkerth R, Guerrini R, Walsh CA, Rodriguez EM, Sheen VL. Disruption of neural progenitors along the ventricular and subventricular zones in periventricular heterotopia. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:497–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fox JW, Lamperti ED, Eksioglu YZ, Hong SE, Feng Y, Graham DA, Scheffer IE, Dobyns WB, Hirsch BA, Radtke RA, Berkovic SF, Huttenlocher PR, Walsh CA. Mutations in filamin 1 prevent migration of cerebral cortical neurons in human periventricular heterotopia. Neuron. 1998;21:1315–1325. [PubMed]
  • Golan A, Yudkovsky Y, Hershko A. The cyclin-ubiquitin ligase activity of cyclosome/APC is jointly activated by protein kinases Cdk1-cyclin B and Plk. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:15552–15557. [PubMed]
  • Gould KL, Nurse P. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the fission yeast cdc2+ protein kinase regulates entry into mitosis. Nature. 1989;342:39–45. [PubMed]
  • Hart AW, Morgan JE, Schneider J, West K, McKie L, Bhattacharya S, Jackson IJ, Cross SH. Cardiac malformations and midline skeletal defects in mice lacking filamin A. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2457–2467. [PubMed]
  • Huang S, Ingber DE. A discrete cell cycle checkpoint in late G(1) that is cytoskeleton-dependent and MAP kinase (Erk)-independent. Exp Cell Res. 2002;275:255–264. [PubMed]
  • Kintner C. Neurogenesis in embryos and in adult neural stem cells. J Neurosci. 2002;22:639–643. [PubMed]
  • LaFlamme SE, Nieves B, Colello D, Reverte CG. Integrins as regulators of the mitotic machinery. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:576–582. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Leise W, 3rd, Mueller PR. Multiple Cdk1 inhibitory kinases regulate the cell cycle during development. Dev Biol. 2002;249:156–173. [PubMed]
  • Lew DJ, Kornbluth S. Regulatory roles of cyclin dependent kinase phosphorylation in cell cycle control. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:795–804. [PubMed]
  • Loo DT, Kanner SB, Aruffo A. Filamin binds to the cytoplasmic domain of the beta1-integrin. Identification of amino acids responsible for this interaction. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:23304–23312. [PubMed]
  • Miyata T, Kawaguchi D, Kawaguchi A, Gotoh Y. Mechanisms that regulate the number of neurons during mouse neocortical development. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 20:22–28. [PubMed]
  • Murray AW, Kirschner MW. Cyclin synthesis drives the early embryonic cell cycle. Nature. 1989;339:275–280. [PubMed]
  • Ohnuma S, Harris WA. Neurogenesis and the cell cycle. Neuron. 2003;40:199–208. [PubMed]
  • Ohta Y, Suzuki N, Nakamura S, Hartwig JH, Stossel TP. The small GTPase RalA targets filamin to induce filopodia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:2122–2128. [PubMed]
  • Okamoto K, Sagata N. Mechanism for inactivation of the mitotic inhibitory kinase Wee1 at M phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:3753–3758. [PubMed]
  • Playford MP, Lyons PD, Sastry SK, Schaller MD. Identification of a filamin docking site on PTP-PEST. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:34104–34112. [PubMed]
  • Rudner AD, Murray AW. Phosphorylation by Cdc28 activates the Cdc20-dependent activity of the anaphase-promoting complex. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:1377–1390. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sarkisian MR, Bartley CM, Chi H, Nakamura F, Hashimoto-Torii K, Torii M, Flavell RA, Rakic P. MEKK4 signaling regulates filamin expression and neuronal migration. Neuron. 2006;52:789–801. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schwartz MA, Assoian RK. Integrins and cell proliferation: regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases via cytoplasmic signaling pathways. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:2553–2560. [PubMed]
  • Sheen VL, Ferland RJ, Harney M, Hill RS, Neal J, Banham AH, Brown P, Chenn A, Corbo J, Hecht J, Folkerth R, Walsh CA. Impaired proliferation and migration in human Miller-Dieker neural precursors. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:137–144. [PubMed]
  • Sheen VL, et al. Filamin A mutations cause periventricular heterotopia with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Neurology. 2005;64:254–262. [PubMed]
  • Takahashi T, Nowakowski RS, Caviness VS., Jr Cell cycle parameters and patterns of nuclear movement in the neocortical proliferative zone of the fetal mouse. J Neurosci. 1993;13:820–833. [PubMed]
  • Takahashi T, Nowakowski RS, Caviness VS., Jr The cell cycle of the pseudostratified ventricular epithelium of the embryonic murine cerebral wall. J Neurosci. 1995;15:6046–6057. [PubMed]
  • Takahashi T, Nowakowski RS, Caviness VS., Jr The leaving or Q fraction of the murine cerebral proliferative epithelium: a general model of neocortical neuronogenesis. J Neurosci. 1996;16:6183–6196. [PubMed]
  • Telles E, Gurjar M, Ganti K, Gupta D, Dalal SN. Filamin A stimulates cdc25C function and promotes entry into mitosis. Cell Cycle. 10:776–782. [PubMed]
  • Visintin R, Prinz S, Amon A. CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science. 1997;278:460–463. [PubMed]
  • Watanabe N, Arai H, Nishihara Y, Taniguchi M, Watanabe N, Hunter T, Osada H. M-phase kinases induce phospho-dependent ubiquitination of somatic Wee1 by SCFbeta-TrCP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4419–4424. [PubMed]
  • Yonemura S, Hirao-Minakuchi K, Nishimura Y. Rho localization in cells and tissues. Exp Cell Res. 2004;295:300–314. [PubMed]