MEF2C Gene and Protein Function
The
MEF2C gene, first identified by
Leifer et al. [1993], is located within the microdeletion syndrome region on chromosome 5q14.3. Three transcriptional start sites with variable 5′-untranslated regions are annotated and
MEF2C contains up to 11 coding exons spanning approximately 100 kb of genomic DNA (fig. ). Up to now, 6 transcript variants in humans are annotated (Ref Seq: NM_002397, NM_001131005, NM_001193347, NM_001193348, NM_001193349, NM_001193350). The longest of these variants encodes for a 483-amino-acid protein, the shortest one for 393 amino acids.
Like all members of the MADS family (MCM1-agamous-deficiens-serum response factor) MEF2C, which belongs to the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) subfamily, is characterized by a highly conserved N-terminal MADS box. Together with the directly adjacent subfamily-specific MEF2 domain motif it mediates dimerization, DNA binding, and cofactor interaction [
Potthoff and Olson, 2007]. It is also known that MEF2 family members possess strong nuclear localization signals, for MEF2C it is reported in the N-terminal region [
Janson et al., 2001]. The C-terminal region of MEF2 proteins contains the transcriptional activation domains, differs between family members, and is subject to complex patterns of alternative splicing (fig. ). Whereas vertebrates have 4
MEF2 genes,
MEF2A–D, yeast,
Drosophila, and
Caenorhabditis elegans possess only a single
Mef2 gene. MEF2 factors bind to the A/T rich consensus DNA sequence YTA(A/T)
4TAR as homo- and heterodimers. Their transcriptional activity relies on the recruitment of and cooperation with many other transcription factors, as well as on translational and posttranslational modifications [
Potthoff and Olson, 2007]. For instance, phosphorylation of a highly conserved site enhances the DNA binding activity of MEF2C [
Molkentin et al., 1996]. MEF2 proteins are known to act as central regulators of diverse developmental programs [
Potthoff and Olson, 2007]. The 4 vertebrate
MEF2 genes display overlapping, but distinct temporal and spatial expression patterns during embryonic development and in adult tissues with highest expression in striated muscles and brain [
Edmondson et al., 1994].
Regarding
MEF2C in particular, high expression levels were detected in skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle and brain in both humans and mice [
Edmondson et al., 1994;
Zweier et al., 2010]. It is reported to be highly expressed in the embryonic cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, midbrain, olfactory bulb, and cerebellum, as well as in the adult frontal cortex, dentate gyrus, hippocampus, thalamus, and cerebellum in the development of mouse CNS [
Lyons et al., 1995]. Alternatively spliced MEF2C transcripts differ significantly in both expression pattern and transactivation functions, some of them shown to be brain-specific [
Leifer et al., 1993;
Janson et al., 2001;
Zweier et al., 2010].
Previous studies revealed an important role of
Mef2c in several differentiation and developmental processes like myogenesis, the development of the anterior heart field, neural crest and craniofacial development, chondrocyte hypertrophy and vascularization, endothelial cell proliferation and survival, lymphoid development, neurogenesis, and synaptic formation [
Potthoff and Olson, 2007;
Li et al., 2008a,
b;
Stehling-Sun et al., 2009].
Mef2c homozygous knockout in mice results in embryonic lethality due to cardiovascular defects even before brain development [
Lin et al., 1997], resembling the indicated crucial role of MEF2C in developmental processes. However, in vivo analysis of the neuronal function of MEF2C using a conditional homozygous deletion of murine
Mef2c in radial glial cells during late embryogenesis and expression of a superactive form of
Mef2c in neurons indicated an essential role in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory by suppressing the number of excitatory synapses and thus regulating basal and evoked synaptic transmission [
Barbosa et al., 2008]. Interestingly,
Li et al. [2008a] reported that mice with conditional
Mef2c knockout in neural progenitors have abnormal aggregation and compaction of neurons migrating into the lower layers of the neocortex during development. This manifested in smaller brain size with smaller, less mature neurons in adulthood, with resultant aberrant electrophysiology and severe behavioral anomalies resembling those seen in mouse models of Rett syndrome-like altered anxiety and paw-clasping [
Li et al., 2008a]. Supported by a study showing that activated MEF2C drives the formation of neurons from murine stem cells [
Li et al., 2008b], this work indicates the pivotal role of MEF2C in early neuronal differentiation and offers a phenotypic link to Rett syndrome.
The phenotype of murine models of
Mef2c inactivation and the biological function in neuronal pathways supports the causal role of defects in
MEF2C for the severe mental retardation phenotype observed in human patients with
MEF2C haploinsufficiency. Of note, in the human phenotype the impairment seems to be restricted to its central nervous functions [
Le Meur et al., 2010;
Zweier et al., 2010]. Trying to explain the observed phenotypic overlap of patients with
MEF2C mutations and atypical Rett syndrome and Pitt-Hopkins syndrome due to the involvement of a common pathway,
Zweier et al. [2010] found diminished
MECP2 and
CDKL5 expression in vivo in blood of
MEF2C-deficient patients. Supporting evidence was given by transcriptional reporter assays indicating that
MEF2C truncating and missense mutations diminish synergistic transactivation of E-box promoters including that of
MECP2 and
CDKL5. These results are in line with other molecular findings indicating involvement of MECP2 and CDKL5 in a common pathway [
Mari et al., 2005]. Of note, MECP2 binding to the murine
Mef2c promoter as a repressor was shown by [
Chahrour et al., 2008]. In contrast, consistently altered expression levels of
TCF4, mutations which cause Pitt-Hopkins syndrome [
Zweier et al., 2007], were not found in
MEF2C-deficient patients. Therefore, a molecular link between MEF2C and TCF4 at this level was not obvious [
Zweier et al., 2010].
MEF2 proteins like MEF2C are reported to cooperate with many different cofactors and promote gene expression of many different genes, some of which are responsible for intellectual disability themselves. There is evidence that fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is required to enable MEF2 proteins to eliminate excitatory synapses in hippocampal neurons of mice [
Pfeiffer et al., 2010].
Expression profiling in hippocampal neurons of rats indicated that MEF2 proteins also regulate several transcripts like Dia1, Pcdh10, and Ube3a in which defects are known to cause neurodevelopmental features such as intellectual disability, epilepsy and autism [
Flavell et al., 2008;
Morrow et al., 2008].
Inheritance and Genotype-Phenotype Correlation
All reported
MEF2C mutations and microdeletions occurred de novo and have been heterozygous. Although no recurrence within siblings was observed so far, an approximately 1% recurrence risk is likely due to the possibility of parental germ line mosaicism. Similarity of the phenotype in microdeletions and point mutations indicates haploinsufficiency as the underlying genetic mechanism. Moreover,
Zweier et al. [2010] demonstrated significantly diminished
MEF2C expression levels in patients with microdeletions and truncating mutations. In contrast,
MEF2C expression levels in patients with missense mutations were unaltered or significantly increased, but downstream effects on the expression levels of
MECP2 and
CDKL5 was equally in patients with missense or truncating mutations and deletions. Both reported missense mutations are located in the MADS domain and like truncating mutations abolish the transcriptional activity of MEF2C in vitro [
Zweier et al., 2010].
Despite the contiguous gene deletion phenotype associated with the RASA1 gene deletion, no striking genotype-phenotype correlation evolved so far. However, patients with point mutations and smaller deletions seem to have a higher chance of walking skills and a lower risk of refractory seizures.
The only large scale mutational screening study identified
MEF2C mutations in 1.1% of patients with moderate to severe intellectual disability of unknown cause and in about 2% of patients fitting into the spectrum of Rett syndrome-like disorders [
Zweier et al., 2010]. Thus, MEF2C-related disorders represent one of the more common causes of intellectual disability.