Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Hepatol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
J Hepatol. 2012 June; 56(6): 1283–1292.
Published online 2012 February 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.01.019

Figure 3

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms356307f3a.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms356307f3b.jpg
Bile duct ligation produces intestinal bacterial overgrowth

Mice underwent sham operation or bile duct ligation (BDL) for indicated time intervals. (A, B) Total aerobic bacteria (A) and anaerobic bacteria (B) were quantified by culture in the gastrointestinal tract (n=3–15). (C) 16S rRNA from the mouse cecum was sequenced using 454 Titanium technology. Experiment-specific operational taxonomic units (OTUs) representative sequences (97% identity) were classified using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier and plotted. Orange bars indicate OTUs containing the BDL group (3 mice, distributed among 1264 OTUs) and white bars indicate OTUs containing the sham control group (3 mice, distributed among 1245 OTUs). (D) The graph demonstrates the percentages of each community contributed by the indicated phyla. (E) Scatter plot of Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) on weighted and normalized P1 vs. P2 UniFrac distances. The BDL samples are in blue while the sham samples are in red. CFU = colony forming unit.*p<0.05.

Images in this article

  • Figure 1
  • Figure 2
  • Figure 3
  • Figure 4
Click on the image to see a larger version.