The adaptations caused by high-intensity exercise training have first been examined by Dudley et al. (
1982), who reported that fast-twitch fibers respond to training by increasing cytochrome
c, only when intensity was high. A decade later, McKenna and his research group started investigating the effects of sprint training on ionic balance (McKenna et al.,
1993). As discussed in a previous section of this review, Bogdanis et al. (
1996) were the first to demonstrate a large increase in oxidative metabolism coupled by a decrease in anaerobic glycolysis when a 30-s sprint was repeated after 4

min or recovery. The increase in aerobic metabolism and the decrease in glycolysis were possibly mediated by changes in key enzyme activities, such as glycogen phosphorylase, PFK, and pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH). Parolin et al. (
1999) reported an inhibition of glycogen phosphorylase transformation to the more active form due to increased H
+ concentration at the last of three 30

s sprints performed with a 4-min rest. At the same time PDH activity was enhanced possibly due to the increased H
+ concentration, resulting in a better matching between pyruvate production and oxidation and minimal muscle lactate accumulation. Repeated high-intensity bouts lasting from 30

s (Stepto et al.,
1999) to 4

min (Helgerud et al.,
2001) are used since then to improve endurance performance in several sports. These early studies indicated that repeated bouts of intense exercise rely heavily on aerobic energy supply and formed the bases for the increasingly popular high-intensity exercise interval training (high-intensity training, HIT) concept.
A series of more recent studies by Burgomaster et al. (
2005,
2006,
2008) have shown that training with repeated 30

s sprints results in large increases in oxidative enzymes such as CS (by 38%), cytochrome
c oxidase (COX), and HAD. These adaptations were achieved with only six training sessions performed over 2

weeks with 1–2

days rest (four to seven sprints 30

s sprints per session with 4

min rest) and were accompanied by a remarkable 100% increase in endurance capacity as defined by time to exhaustion at 80%

(from 26

±

5 to 51

±

11

min,
P
<

0.05). The authors have proposed the repeated 30

s sprint method as a time-efficient training strategy to simultaneously improve aerobic and anaerobic fitness and reduce fatigue. The extremely low time commitment (2.5

min per session for 5

×

30

s sprints, or less than 20

min including the 4-min rest intervals) makes this method attractive and further research is warranted to examine its possible applications in health and disease. The basis for the usefulness of this exercise scheme in both sports and clinical settings is that the exercise stimulus induces rapid phenotypic changes that resemble traditional endurance training and promotes mitochondrial biogenesis (Gibala,
2009) which appear to stimulate other healthy metabolic adaptations in skeletal muscle, such as improved insulin action, improved lipoprotein lipase activity and greater clearance of plasma triglycerides (Coyle,
2005).
Following the pioneering study by Burgomaster et al. (
2005), Gibala et al. (
2006) compared the typical HIT protocol (i.e., 4–6

×

30

s sprints with 4

min rest) with traditional endurance exercise (90–120

min of continuous cycling at 65%

) performed three times per week for 2

weeks. The two protocols resulted in similar increases in muscle oxidative capacity as reflected by the activity of COX and a similar improvement in an endurance time trial (by 10.1 and 7.5%). The key role the increase of the active form of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) after this type of training was highlighted in the study of Burgomaster et al. (
2006) who also reported a concomitant reduction in glycogenolysis (from 139

±

11 to 100

±

16

mmol

kg
−1 dry weight,
P
=

0.03) and lower lactate accumulation possibly due to greater mitochondrial pyruvate oxidation. The lower level of acidification due to decreased glycogenolysis may have contributed to reduced fatigability following this type of training.
It should also be stressed that this type of repeated sprint exercise also increases

and improves cardiovascular function. Astorino et al. (
2012) reported a 6% increase in

, oxygen pulse and power output, in only six sessions of HIT involving repeated 30

s sprints over 2–3

weeks. However, in athletic populations, the importance of lower intensity–high-volume training should not be overlooked. Laursen (
2010) in a critical review of low and high volume and intensity training suggested that training for sports performance should have an appropriate blend of both HIT and high-volume training, otherwise performance ability can stagnate. A polarized approach for optimal intensity distribution for the training of elite athletes of intense events (rowing, swimming, track running, and cycling) was suggested by Laursen (
2010), whereby 75% of total training volume should be performed at low intensities, and 10–15% should be performed at very high intensities.
Another form of high-intensity interval training is called “aerobic interval training” and usually consists of four exercise bouts of 4

min each, at an intensity corresponding to 90–95% of peak heart rate or 85–90%

with 2–3

min or rest in between (Wisloff et al.,
2007). This type of training is commonly used in soccer in the form of running or small sided games and has been proved to be very effective in delaying soccer specific or game fatigue. A comparison between the effectiveness of this training protocol with a repeated sprint protocol has been performed by Ferrari Bravo et al. (
2008). They compared the effects of training with a 4

×

4

min running at 90–95% of maximal heart rate, with 3

min active recovery vs. a repeated sprint training protocol that included three sets of six 40

m all-out “shuttle” sprints with 20

s passive recovery between sprints and 4

min between sets. The repeated sprint group, compared with the aerobic interval training group, showed a greater improvement not only in repeated sprint performance, but also in the soccer specific “Yo–Yo” intermittent recovery test (28.1 vs. 12.5%,
P
<

0.01). A similar improvement in

(6%) was found for the two groups. As noted above, the adaptations and improvements following HIT of either form (aerobic interval and repeated sprints) are far superior and time-efficient compared with longer duration continuous training. As will be discussed later, the benefits of high-intensity interval exercise of both forms (30

s–4

min high-intensity bouts) extend to health promotion and are currently proposed for improving health and reducing fatigue in many diseases (COPD and cardiac patients).
Molecular bases for adaptations to HIT
Understanding the multiple benefits of HIT requires investigation of the molecular signals that cause adaptations at the level of the skeletal muscle fiber. According to Coffey and Hawley (
2007), there are at least four primary signals, as well as a number of secondary messengers, that are related with mitochondrial adaptations and glucose transport capacity across the sarcolemma:
(1)
Mechanical tension or stretch,(2)
Oxidative stress manifested by an increase in ROS.(3)
Increase in intracellular calcium with each contraction.(4)
Altered energy status, as reflected by a lower ATP concentration.
Some putative signaling cascades promoting skeletal muscle mitochondrial biogenesis in response to high-intensity interval training may be as follows (Gibala et al.,
2012): during intense muscle contractions, the rise in intracellular calcium activates the mitochondrial biogenesis messenger calmodulin kinase. At the same time, the “energy crisis” that results in decreased ATP and increased adenosine mono phosphate (AMP) activates the AMP-activated protein kinase (Gibala,
2009; Laursen,
2010). Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), possibly via increase generation of ROS may also be involved (Gibala et al.,
2012). These signals can increase a key transcriptional coactivator, namely the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α), which is a key regulator of oxidative enzyme expression in skeletal muscle. PGC-1α has been described as a “master switch” that coordinates mitochondrial biogenesis by interacting with various nuclear genes encoding for mitochondrial proteins (Gibala,
2009; Gibala et al.,
2012). Previous work has shown that an increased expression of PGC-1α in the muscle results in the conversion of the muscle from glycolytic to oxidative with a dramatic up-regulation of typical oxidative genes/proteins like COX. This results in a shift of the functional capacity of the muscle toward a more fatigue resistance profile found in the endurance trained state. Calvo et al. (
2008) demonstrated that up-regulation of PGC-1α in transgenic mice, results in far superior exercise performance and 20% higher peak oxygen uptake compared with wild-type control mice. It is noteworthy that in the study of Burgomaster et al. (
2008) which compared typical endurance training with HIT, PGC-1α protein content of the quadriceps muscle was equally increased in both protocols, demonstrating the large potential of the repeated sprint protocol to produce rapid mitochondrial adaptations. As suggested by Coyle (
2005), one of the advantages of the repeated sprint protocol over the traditional endurance exercise, lays on the high level of type II muscle fiber recruitment that is not achieved in the traditional low intensity endurance exercise. Thus, HIT results in mitochondrial adaptations also in type II fibers that are absent when lower intensity/high-volume endurance training is performed. These adaptations of type II fibers would also increase their fatigue resistance and this is beneficial for high-intensity performance.
Changes in muscle fiber capillary supply and regulation of ionic balance
As noted in the previous sections, the improvement in fatigue resistance is partly due to an increase in the enzymes that favor oxidative metabolism. However, a proliferation of capillary supply to muscle fibers would cause an additional improvement in fatigue resistance by enhanced lactate and H
+ elimination and oxygen supply (Tesch and Wright,
1983). Additional to the role of the different lactate and H
+ transport mechanisms out of the exercising muscle, improved perfusion contributes to the increased release from muscle to the blood (Juel,
2008). HIT training with intense leg extension exercise three to five times per week for 7

weeks (1

min exercise, 3

min rest for 1

h at ~150% of leg

) resulted in an increase of capillary-to-fiber ratio from 1.74

±

0.10 to 2.37

±

0.12 capillaries per fiber, and a 17% increase in capillary density (Jensen et al.,
2004). These adaptations would increase oxygen extraction and facilitate aerobic metabolism during exercise as well as the rate of PCr resynthesis during the recovery intervals (McCully et al.,
1991).
In a recent review, Iaia and Bangsbo (
2010) presented the benefits of “speed endurance” training, which is a form of repeated HIT. The characteristics of this type of training are as follows: The form or exercise is running and the intensity is between 70 and 100% of the maximum running speed, which corresponds to a cardiorespiratory load very close or well above

The number of repetitions is between 3 and 12 repetitions and the duration of each bout is 10–40

s (usually 30

s) with a recovery interval greater than five times the exercise duration (usually 2–4

min). In well trained athletes, this type of training causes adaptations that do not appear to depend on changes in

muscle substrate levels, glycolytic and oxidative enzymes activity. Instead they appear to be related to improved running economy, and a higher expression of muscle Na
+, K
+ pump α-subunits, which may delay fatigue during intense exercise by increasing Na
+–K
+ pump activity and a reduced contraction-induced net loss of K
+, thus preserving muscle excitability (Iaia and Bangsbo,
2010). These conclusions were based on previous studies that compared the effects of two different intense training regimens on changes in muscle ATPase subunits and fatigue.
Mohr et al. (
2007) divided participants into a sprint training group (15

×

6

s sprints with 1

min rest) and a speed endurance group (8

×

30

s runs at 130%

with 1.5

min rest). Training was performed three to five times per week and lasted for 8

weeks. The fatigue index during a 5

m

×

30

m sprint running test with 25

s active recovery, was reduced by 54% only in the speed endurance group, and remained unchanged in the sprint group. The reduction in fatigue was accompanied by a 68% increase in Na
+–K
+ ATPase isoform α2 and a 31% increase in the amount of the Na
+/H
+ exchanger isoform, only in the speed endurance group. These adaptations are possibly related with the metabolic responses (and thus metabolic load) during each session of speed endurance training, where peak blood lactate (14.5–16.5

mmol

l
−1) and plasma K
+ (about 6.4

mmol

l
−1) were higher compared to the sprint training responses (blood lactate: ~8.5 and K
+: ~5.5

mmol

l
−1).
The marked increases in extracellular K
+ that are commonly observed during high-intensity exercise contribute to muscle fatigue by causing depolarization of the sarcolemmal and t-tubular membranes (McKenna et al.,
2008). A training-induced increase in Na–K
+ ATPase activity has been shown to contribute to the control of K
+ homeostasis and reduce fatigue (Mohr et al.,
2007).
However, the importance of pH regulation, especially in less trained and non-athletic populations and patients with various diseases should not be overlooked. It is well established that the pH regulating systems in skeletal muscles are very responsive to HIT (Juel,
2008). During high-intensity exercise and the subsequent recovery period, muscle pH is regulated by three systems: (1) lactate/H
+ co-transport by two important monocarboxylate transporter proteins: MCT1 and MCT4, (2) Na
+/H
+ exchange by a specific exchanger protein, and (3) Na
+/bicarbonate transporters (Juel,
2008). The MCT1 and MCT4 transporters are considered as the most important during exercise and thus their changes following training have been extensively studied in animal and human muscle. Animal studies have shown that HIT in rats for 5

weeks results in 30 and 85% in the MCT1 and Na
+/bicarbonate transporter, respectively, while MCT4 remained unchanged (Thomas et al.,
2007). In humans, changes in the Na
+/H
+ exchanger protein levels by 30% have been reported in the 4-week high-intensity sprint training study of Iaia et al. (
2008). Moreover, significant increases in MCT1 and Na
+/H
+ exchanger protein densities have been found after HIT, especially when training bouts cause a significant accumulation of H
+ in the muscle (Mohr et al.,
2007). Increased expression of lactate and H
+ transporters results in faster H
+ and lactate release. Juel et al. (
2004) used the one-legged knee extensor exercise model to examine changes in muscle pH regulating systems following intense training. Following 7

weeks of training with 15

×

1

min bouts of single knee extensions at 150%

per day, time to exhaustion was improved by 29%. The rate of lactate release at exhaustion was almost double (19.4

±

3.6 vs. 10.6

±

2.0

mmol

min
−1,
P
<

0.05) and the rate of H
+ release was ~50% higher (36.9

±

3.1 vs. 24.2

±

1.5

mmol

min
−1,
P
<

0.05) for the trained than for the untrained leg. The membrane contents of the MCT1 lactate/H
+ co-transporter and Na
+/H
+ exchanger proteins were increased by 15 and 16%, while blood flow was also increased by 16% in the trained compared to the untrained leg. This study demonstrated that when muscle is stressed with training stimuli that cause high intramuscular lactate and H
+ concentration, it adapts by increasing the rate of lactate and H
+ transport out of the muscle. These adaptations are done by both changes in specific membrane proteins and structural changes, such as increased capillary density (Jensen et al.,
2004), that enhance blood flow and thus transport of lactate and H
+ away from the working muscle.
Within the muscle cell, the ability to buffer the build-up of free H
+ in the muscle during high-intensity exercise is an important determinant of fatigue resistance and may be improved by training. To test this hypothesis, Edge et al. (
2006) trained recreationally active female team sport players for 3

days per week for 5

weeks, using two protocols with matched for total work but different intensity. The high-intensity group performed six to ten 2-min bouts of cycling with 1

min rest at an intensity that was 120–140% of that corresponding to the 4-mmol

l
−1 blood lactate threshold. The moderate-intensity group performed continuous exercise at 80–95% of that corresponding to the lactate threshold for 20–30

min, so that the total work was the same with the high-intensity group. Blood lactate at the end of a typical training session was 16.1

±

4.0

mmol

l
−1 for the high-intensity group and only 5.1

±

3.0

mmol

l
−1 for the moderate-intensity exercise group.

and the intensity corresponding to lactate threshold were equally improved (by 10–14%) in both groups, but only the high-intensity group showed a significant increase in buffering capacity by 25% (from 123

±

5 to 153

±

7

μmol H
+
g dry muscle
−1
pH
−1,
P
<

0.05), coupled with a greater improvement in a repeated sprint exercise performance compared with the low intensity group (13.0 vs. 8.5%,
P
<

0.05, Edge et al.,
2005). Taken collectively, the above results emphasize the importance of exercise intensity for achieving the most favorable adaptations that delay muscle acidification and increase fatigue resistance. A reduced rate of H
+ accumulation, by transporting more H
+ out of the muscle and/or by intracellular buffering, would allow a greater contribution of glycolysis to energy supply and thus higher muscle performance.