Two sources of cervid CWD, both from the original endemic area, exhibit distinct and reproducible clinical and biochemical features after adaptation to ferrets. Indicators of prion strain phenomena include differences in clinical presentation, survival period, distribution of lesions, glycoform profiles and in the resistance of the misfolded protein to proteolysis (
Bessen & Marsh, 1992a,
1994;
Bruce & Fraser, 1991;
Bruce et al., 1991;
Everest et al., 2006;
Fraser & Dickinson, 1973). We encountered several of these indicators for ‘strains’ in CWD infection of ferrets, including differential PrP
CWD sensitivity to PK and differential distribution of PrP
CWD in the brain and lymphoid organs. The established susceptibility of ferrets to CWD (
Bartz et al., 1998;
Sigurdson et al., 2008) was extended to include IP and oral challenge. Shortening of the incubation period for the CSU isolate signalled a time course for infection that was quick for an outbred host and comparable with transgenic rodents (
Browning et al., 2004;
Kong et al., 2005;
LaFauci et al., 2006).
A major point of difference between isolates concerned accumulation of PrP
CWD in lymphoid tissues. Infection of ferrets with the CSU isolate never resulted in PrP
CWD in lymphoid tissue, including when NaPTA enrichment (
Wadsworth et al., 2001) and a panel of ferret PrP-recognizing antibodies was used. Replication in lymphoid tissue frequently precedes neural invasion and was presumed to be important in the pathogenesis of ferret CWD. Lymphoid accumulation of scrapie prion protein (PrP
Sc) or PrP
CWD is notable in scrapie and CWD, respectively (
Andréoletti et al., 2000;
Sigurdson et al., 1999), as opposed to bovine spongiform encephalopathy in which only minor accumulation occurs after experimental exposure (
Terry et al., 2003). Laboratory strains of scrapie demonstrate both relative and absolute differences in the distribution of PrP
Sc in the lymphoid tissues of a model host (
Farquhar et al., 1994). Furthermore, neuro-invasion without preliminary replication in the lymphoreticular system has been documented in hamsters inoculated with transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) (
Bartz et al., 2005). The CSU isolate of CWD in ferrets appears to have features in common with this model of hamster TME in that a peripheral replication site was not identified in the current study.
Further differences between isolates of CWD were evident in the brains of inoculated ferrets and most apparent in the hind brain and olfactory regions. Many precedents exist for distinguishing prion strains by differences in the accumulation of misfolded protein and lesion characteristics in the brain (
Bessen & Marsh, 1994;
Bruce et al., 1991;
Fraser & Dickinson, 1973;
Hecker et al., 1992). Different sources of cervid CWD, inoculated into mice transgenic for elk PrP
C, showed differences in the distribution of PrP
CWD in the cerebellar and olfactory regions of the brain (
LaFauci et al., 2006). These two same regions of the brain showed differential accumulation of PrP
CWD between isolates in the current study.
The extent to which these unique CWD phenotypes in ferrets reflect more subtle phenomena in cervid populations remains to be determined. However, there is steadily increasing support for the existence of cervid disease subtypes and variants.
Race et al. (2002) reported greater heterogeneity of glycoform patterns in mule deer PrP
CWD compared with elk PrP
CWD and speculated that this may indicate the existence of different or multiple cervid ‘strains’.
O’Rourke et al. (2007) described similar phenomena in elk with different
Prnp genotypes.
Prnp gene polymorphisms and pseudogenes exist and are linked to variation in susceptibility to CWD (
Brayton et al., 2004;
Hamir et al., 2006b;
Huson & Happ, 2006;
Johnson et al., 2003,
2006;
Kelly et al., 2008;
O’Rourke et al., 1999,
2004). Mice transgenic for either leucine or methionine at codon 132 of the elk
Prnp gene show absolute differences in susceptibility to CWD when challenged with different genotypes of CWD (
Green et al., 2008). Furthermore, cell-free conversion assays that have propagated mule deer CWD prions
in vitro show that conversion efficiency is influenced by the amino acid sequence of the PrP
C template (
Kurt et al., 2009;
Raymond et al., 2007). The mechanism(s) by which amino acid sequence differences in PrP
CWD determine conversion kinetics is not well understood. What is evident is the potential for structural diversity of both PrP
C and PrP
CWD in the outbred cervid population. As further precedent, it was recently shown that distinct incubation period and neuropathological lesion profiles exist when cervid PrP
CWD from diverse sources are inoculated into transgenic mice (
Angers et al., 2010).
It was remarkable that ferrets inoculated by different routes showed essentially similar patterns of PrP
CWD accumulation in the brain. One possible explanation is that PrP
CWD from each isolate was interacting with different isoforms of PrP
C. In this way the PrP
C distribution would influence the distribution of PrP
CWD more strongly than the route of inoculation. Differences in native forms of the PrP
C molecule, its glycoform characteristics and distribution have been described (
Beringue et al., 2003), with
in vitro models supporting the influence of PrP
C and glycosylation on conversion kinetics (
Lawson et al., 2005;
Priola & Lawson, 2001). Because stereotactic inoculation of the brain was not used in this study, we consider peripheral, particularly natural, inoculation routes to be more informative regarding the differences between the isolates in terms of distribution of PrP
CWD in the brain.
What seems possible is that the unique CSU isolate arose from a different CWD variant or variants, pre-existing in the pooled mule-deer brain inoculum, and that passage of pooled cervid PrP
CWD in ferrets (
Sigurdson et al., 2008) selected for a dominant conformer. There was some evidence from Western blotting that this may have begun upon primary passage when cervid PrP
CWD proteins first encountered the species barrier. Presumably this process of selection of a dominant CWD conformer was irrelevant in the ferret-adapted UWI inoculum, because of its prior origin from a single cervid donor (
Bartz et al., 1998). If the cervid inoculum pool contained variants, then a single phenotype or kinetically ‘fit’ population of PrP
CWD molecules may have predominated. While
de novo generation of prion strains has been described (
Bartz et al., 2000), co-inoculation trials in a well-characterized hamster TME model also provided evidence that prion conformer/strain interference is a mechanism influencing prion replication (
Bartz et al., 2007;
Schutt & Bartz, 2008).
Distinct ferret-adapted CWD strains were identified in the present study and may have had an origin in the mule deer-derived inocula.
Raymond et al. (2007) performed numerous passage experiments in hamster species using individual or pooled elk, mule deer and white-tailed deer inocula. From data obtained in Syrian golden hamsters, these authors suggested the existence of strains in cervid-derived inocula. Inocula from individual mule deer and elk gave distinctly divergent strains of hamster CWD based on incubation period and clinical signs. It would be interesting to determine whether ferret CWD, the CSU isolate in particular, retains pathogenicity for deer or cervid PrP-transgenic mice, with these studies now being relatively feasible (
Browning et al., 2004;
Kong et al., 2005;
LaFauci et al., 2006). There may be analogies with the hyper and drowsy strains of the TME agent (
Bessen & Marsh, 1992a,
b) wherein the drowsy strain, but not the hyper strain, retained its pathogenicity for mink.
The ferret is an outbred model for studies into the transmission and pathogenesis of CWD and has shown further utility as an alternative species. The ferret passage studies reported here parallel many investigations and observations that indicate the existence of TSE variants in ruminant host populations that are susceptible to prions (
Benestad et al., 2003;
Buschmann et al., 2004;
Casalone et al., 2004;
Everest et al., 2006). The results of these studies support the growing evidence for multiple strains of CWD prions.