Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français |

**|**Nanoscale Res Lett**|**v.7(1); 2012**|**PMC3349597

Formats

Article sections

- Abstract
- Background
- Presentation of the hypothesis
- Testing the hypothesis
- Results and discussion
- Implications of the hypothesis
- Abbreviations
- Competing interests
- Authors' contributions
- Authors' information
- Endnotes
- References

Authors

Related links

Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012; 7(1): 229.

Published online 2012 April 22. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-229

PMCID: PMC3349597

Fekry M Hady: moc.liamtoh@hmyrkef; Fouad S Ibrahim: moc.liamg@802miharbif; Sahar M Abdel-Gaied: moc.oohay@deiagas; Mohamed R Eid: moc.oohay@die_r_m

Received 2011 December 14; Accepted 2012 April 22.

Copyright ©2012 Hady et al; licensee Springer.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

In this work, we study the flow and heat transfer characteristics of a viscous nanofluid over a nonlinearly stretching sheet in the presence of thermal radiation, included in the energy equation, and variable wall temperature. A similarity transformation was used to transform the governing partial differential equations to a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. An efficient numerical shooting technique with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme was used to obtain the solution of the boundary value problem. The variations of dimensionless surface temperature, as well as flow and heat-transfer characteristics with the governing dimensionless parameters of the problem, which include the nanoparticle volume fraction *ϕ*, the nonlinearly stretching sheet parameter *n*, the thermal radiation parameter *N _{R}*, and the viscous dissipation parameter

The problem of viscous flow and heat transfer over a stretching sheet has important industrial applications, for example, in metallurgical processes, such as drawing of continuous filaments through quiescent fluids, annealing and tinning of copper wires, glass blowing, manufacturing of plastic and rubber sheets, crystal growing, and continuous cooling and fiber spinning, in addition to wide-ranging applications in many engineering processes, such as polymer extrusion, wire drawing, continuous casting, manufacturing of foods and paper, glass fiber production, stretching of plastic films, and many others. During the manufacture of these sheets, the melt issues from a slit and is subsequently stretched to achieve the desired thickness. The final product with the desired characteristics strictly depends upon the stretching rate, the rate of cooling in the process, and the process of stretching. In view of these applications, Sakiadis [1,2] investigated the boundary-layer flow of a viscous fluid past a moving solid surface; various aspects of the problem have been explored by many authors in the past decades.

However, all these studies are restricted to linear stretching of the sheet. It is worth mentioning that the stretching is not necessarily linear. In view of this, Kumaran and Ramanaih [3] studied flow over a quadratic stretching sheet, but only a few recent studies focused on exponentially and nonlinearly stretching sheet are cited here. Magyari and Keller [4], Elbashbeshy [5], Khan and Sanjayanand [6], Sanjayanand and Khan [7], Sajid and Hayat [8], and Partha et al. [9] studied the heat transfer characteristics of viscous and viscoelastic fluid flows over an exponentially stretching sheet. Vajravelu [10], Vajravelu and Cannon [11], Cortell [12-15], Prasad et al. [16], Afzal [17], and Nandeppanavar et al. [18] studied the effects of various parameters governing the flow of a viscous fluid over a nonlinearly stretching sheet.

A nanofluid is a new class of heat transfer fluids that contain a base fluid and nanoparticles. The use of additives is a technique applied to enhance the heat transfer performance of base fluids. The thermal conductivity of ordinary heat transfer fluids is not adequate to meet today's cooling rate requirements. Nanofluids have been shown to increase the thermal conductivity and convective heat transfer performance of the base liquids. Nanofluids are suspensions of submicronic solid particles (nanoparticles) in common fluids. The term was coined by Choi [19]. The characteristic feature of nanofluids is thermal conductivity enhancement, a phenomenon observed by Masuda et al. [20]. This phenomenon suggests the possibility of using nanofluids in advanced nuclear systems [21]. A comprehensive survey of convective transport in nanofluids was made by Buongiorno [22], who says that a satisfactory explanation for the abnormal increase of the thermal conductivity and viscosity is yet to be found. He focused on further heat transfer enhancement observed in convective situations. Very recently, Kuznetsov and Nield [23] have examined the influence of nanoparticles on natural convection boundary-layer flow past a vertical plate using a model in which Brownian motion and thermophoresis are accounted for. The authors have assumed the simplest possible boundary conditions, namely those in which both the temperature and the nanoparticle fraction are constant along the wall. Furthermore, Nield and Kuznetsov [24,25] have studied the Cheng and Minkowycz [26] problem of natural convection past a vertical plate in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. The model used for the nanofluid incorporates the effects of Brownian motion and thermophoresis for the porous medium. The Darcy model has been employed.

Hamad and Bashir [27] numerically investigated the problem of forced convection heat transfer to the power law non-Newtonian nanofluid from the stretching surface. Khan and Pop [28] focused on the problem of laminar fluid flow, which results from the stretching of a flat surface in a nanofluid. A similarity solution of the steady boundary layer flow near the stagnation-point flow on a permeable stretching sheet in a porous medium saturated with a nanofluid and in the presence of internal heat generation/absorption was theoretically studied by Hamad and Pop [29]. Hamad and Ferdows [30] investigated the heat and mass transfer analysis for boundary layer stagnation-point flow over a stretching sheet in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid with internal heat generation/absorption and suction/blowing. The problem of laminar fluid flow, which results from the stretching of a vertical surface with variable stream conditions in a nanofluid, was investigated numerically by Kandasamy et al. [31]. Makinde and Aziz [32] studied numerically the boundary layer flow induced in a nanofluid due to a linearly stretching sheet. Hamad [33] examined the convective flow and heat transfer of an incompressible viscous nanofluid past a semi-infinite vertical stretching sheet in the presence of a magnetic field. All these researchers studied the linear stretching sheet in the nanofluid, but only the numerical investigation by Rana and Bhargava [34] studied the steady laminar boundary fluid flow, which results from the non-linear stretching of a flat surface in a nanofluid, and incorporated the effects of Brownian motion and thermophoresis. Also, more recently, Nadeem and Lee [35] investigated analytically the problem of steady boundary layer flow of nanofluid over an exponential stretching surface including the effects of Brownian motion parameter and thermophoresis parameter.

To the authors' knowledge, no studies have thus far been communicated with regard to the boundary layer viscous flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid past a nonlinearly stretching sheet in the presence of the radiation effect in a one-phase model. The aim of the present paper is therefore to extend the work of Cortell [13] by taking the steady thermal boundary-layer flow with nonlinearly stretching sheet in a nanofluid. The present study is of immediate interest to all those processes which are highly affected with heat enhancement concept, e.g., cooling of metallic sheets or electronic chips, etc. An efficient numerical shooting technique with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme was used to solve the normalized boundary layer equations, and the effects of nanoparticle volume fraction *ϕ*, nonlinearly stretching sheet parameter *n*, thermal radiation parameter *N _{R}*, and viscous dissipation parameter

We consider a steady, incompressible, laminar, two-dimensional boundary layer flow of a viscous nanofluid past a flat sheet coinciding with the plane *y *= 0 and the flow being confined to *y *> 0. The flow is generated due to nonlinear stretching of the sheet caused by the simultaneous application of two equal and opposite forces along the *x*-axis. Keeping the origin fixed, the sheet is then stretched with a velocity *u _{w}*(

$$\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}=0,$$

(1)

$$u\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+v\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}={\upsilon}_{nf}\frac{{\partial}^{2}u}{\partial {y}^{2}},$$

(2)

$$u\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}+v\frac{\partial T}{\partial y}={\alpha}_{nf}\frac{{\partial}^{2}T}{\partial {y}^{2}}+\frac{{\upsilon}_{nf}}{{\left({c}_{p}\right)}_{nf}}{\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)}^{2}-\frac{1}{{\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{nf}}\frac{\partial {q}_{r}}{\partial y}.$$

(3)

The associated boundary conditions of Equations 1, 2, and 3 can be written as:

$$\begin{array}{c}u={u}_{w}\left(x\right)=C{x}^{n},v=0;\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}T={T}_{w}\left(x\right)={T}_{\infty}+b{x}^{m}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\text{at}}y=0;\hfill \\ u\to 0;\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}T\to {T}_{\infty}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathsf{\text{as}}y\to \infty ,\hfill \\ \end{array}$$

(4)

where *x *and *y *denote the Cartesian coordinates along the sheet and normal to it, and *u *and *v *are the velocity components of the nanofluid in the *x*- and *y*-directions, respectively. *n *and *m *are the nonlinear stretching parameter and the surface temperature parameter, respectively. The temperature on the wall is *T _{w}*, and the ambient is held at constant temperature

$$\begin{array}{c}{\upsilon}_{nf}=\frac{{\mu}_{nf}}{{\rho}_{nf}},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}{\rho}_{nf}=\left(1-\varphi \right){\rho}_{f}+\varphi {\rho}_{s},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{\mu}_{nf}=\frac{{\mu}_{f}}{{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5}},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{\alpha}_{nf}=\frac{{k}_{nf}}{{\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{nf}},\\ {\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{nf}=\left(1-\varphi \right)\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{f}+\varphi {\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{s},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\frac{{k}_{nf}}{{k}_{f}}=\frac{\left({k}_{s}+2{k}_{f}\right)-2\varphi \left({k}_{f}-{k}_{s}\right)}{\left({k}_{s}+2{k}_{f}\right)+2\varphi \left({k}_{f}-{k}_{s}\right)}.\\ \end{array}$$

(5)

Here, *ϕ *is the solid volume fraction, where *μ _{f }*is the viscosity of the basic fluid,

$${q}_{r}=-\frac{4{\sigma}^{*}}{3{k}^{*}}\frac{\partial {T}^{4}}{\partial y},$$

(6)

where *σ** and *k** are the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and the mean absorption coefficient, respectively. We assume that the temperature differences within the flow, such as the term *T*^{4}, may be expressed as a linear function of temperature. Hence, expanding *T*^{4 }in a Taylor series about a free stream temperature *T*_{∞ }and neglecting higher-order terms, we get:

$${T}^{4}\cong 4{T}_{\infty}^{3}T-3{T}_{\infty}^{4}.$$

(7)

From Equation 3 and in view of Equations 6 and 7, it is seen that the effect of radiation is to enhance the thermal diffusivity. If we take ${N}_{R}={k}_{nf}{k}^{*}/\left[4{\sigma}^{*}{T}_{\infty}^{3}\right]$as the radiation parameter, Equation 3 becomes:

$$u\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}+v\frac{\partial T}{\partial y}=\frac{{\alpha}_{nf}}{{k}_{0}}\frac{{\partial}^{2}T}{\partial {y}^{2}}+\frac{{\upsilon}_{nf}}{{\left({c}_{p}\right)}_{nf}}{\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)}^{2},$$

(8)

where ${k}_{0}=\frac{3{N}_{R}}{3{N}_{R}+4}$. It is worth citing here that the classical solution for energy equation, Equation 8, without thermal radiation influence can be obtained from the above equation, which reduces to $u\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}+v\frac{\partial T}{\partial y}={\alpha}_{nf}\frac{{\partial}^{2}T}{\partial {y}^{2}}$as *N _{R }*→∞ (i.e.,

By introducing the following non-dimensional variables:

$$\begin{array}{ccc}\hfill \eta & =y\sqrt{\frac{C\left(n+1\right)}{2{\upsilon}_{f}}}{x}^{\frac{n-1}{2}},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}u=C{x}^{n}{f}^{\prime}\left(\eta \right),\hfill & \hfill \\ \hfill v& =-\sqrt{\frac{C\left(n+1\right){\upsilon}_{f}}{2}}{x}^{\frac{n-1}{2}}\left[f\left(\eta \right)-\frac{n-1}{n+1}\eta {f}^{\prime}\left(\eta \right)\right],\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\theta \left(\eta \right)=\frac{T-{T}_{\infty}}{{T}_{w}-{T}_{\infty}},\hfill \\ \hfill \end{array}$$

(9)

then the governing Equations 1, 2, and 8 reduce to:

$${f}^{\prime \prime \prime}+{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5}\left(1-\varphi +\varphi \frac{{\rho}_{s}}{{\rho}_{f}}\right)\left(f{f}^{\prime \prime}-\frac{2n}{n+1}{{f}^{\prime}}^{2}\right)=0,$$

(10)

$$\frac{1}{\mathsf{\text{pr}}}\left(\frac{{k}_{nf}}{{k}_{f}}\right)\frac{{\theta}^{\prime \prime}}{{k}_{0}}+\frac{Ec}{{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5}}{x}^{2n-m}{{f}^{\prime \prime}}^{2}+\left[\left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{s}}{{\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{f}}\right]\left(f{\theta}^{\prime}-\frac{2m}{n+1}{f}^{\prime}\theta \right)=0$$

(11)

so that all similar solutions put *m *= 2*n *in Equation 11, which becomes:

$$\frac{1}{\mathsf{\text{pr}}}\left(\frac{{k}_{nf}}{{k}_{f}}\right)\frac{{\theta}^{\prime \prime}}{{k}_{0}}+\frac{Ec}{{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5}}{f}^{\prime \prime 2}+\left[\left(1-\varphi \right)+\varphi \frac{{\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{s}}{{\left(\rho {c}_{p}\right)}_{f}}\right]\left(f{\theta}^{\prime}-\frac{4n}{n+1}{f}^{\prime}\theta \right)=0,$$

(12)

and the transformed boundary conditions (Equation 4) become:

$$\begin{array}{c}f\left(0\right)=0,\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}{f}^{\prime}\left(0\right)=1,\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\theta \left(0\right)=1,\hfill \\ {f}^{\prime}\left(\infty \right)\to 0,\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\theta \left(\infty \right)\to 0,\hfill \\ \end{array}$$

(13)

where Pr = *υ _{f}/α_{f }*is the Prandtl number, and

It is worth mentioning that Equation 10 with the boundary conditions in Equation 13, with *n *= 0, is the classical Blasius flat-plate flow problem, and a detailed numerical study of that problem has been carried out by the author of this work. For the linearly stretching boundary problem (i.e., *n *= 1), the exact solution for *f *is *f*(*η*) = 1 - e^{-η}; this exact solution is unique, while for the nonlinearly stretching boundary problem (i.e., n ≠ 1), there is no exact solution. The quantities of practical interest in this study are the skin friction coefficient *C _{f }*and the local Nusselt number

$${C}_{f}=\frac{2{\mu}_{nf}}{{\rho}_{f}{\left({u}_{w}\left(x\right)\right)}^{2}}{\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)}_{y=0};\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}N{u}_{x}=\frac{-{k}_{nf}{\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial y}\right|}_{y=0}x}{{k}_{f}\left({T}_{w}-{T}_{\infty}\right)}.$$

(14)

Using Equation (9), the quantities (14) can be expressed as:

$$\sqrt{\frac{C}{2{\upsilon}_{f}}}{C}_{f}=\frac{\sqrt{n+1}}{{\left(1-\varphi \right)}^{2.5}}{x}^{-\frac{n+1}{2}}{f}^{\prime \prime}\left(0\right)$$

(15)

$$\sqrt{\frac{2{\upsilon}_{f}}{C}}N{u}_{x}=-\frac{{k}_{nf}\sqrt{n+1}}{{k}_{f}}{x}^{\frac{n+1}{2}}{\theta}^{\prime}\left(0\right).$$

(16)

In order to get the physical insight into the flow problem, comprehensive numerical computations are conducted for various values of the parameters that describe the flow characteristics, and the results are illustrated graphically. The system of nonlinear ordinary differential Equations 10 and 12 with the boundary conditions (Equation 13) are integrated numerically by means of the efficient numerical shooting technique with a fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme (MATLAB package). The step size *η *= 0.001 was used while obtaining the numerical solution with *η*_{max }= 6. The physical quantities of interest here are the skin friction coefficient *C _{f }*and the Nusselt number

We consider three different types of nanoparticles, namely, copper (Cu), alumina (Al_{2}O_{3}), and titanium oxide (TiO_{2}), with water as the base fluid. Table Table11 shows the thermo-physical properties of water and the elements Cu, Al_{2}O_{3}, and TiO_{2}. The Prandtl number of the base fluid (water) is kept constant at 6.2. It is worth mentioning that this study reduces the governing Equations 10-12 to those of a viscous or regular fluid when *ϕ *= 0. In order to verify the accuracy of the present method, we have compared our results with those of Cortell [12,13] for the rate of heat transfer - *θ'*(0) in the absence of the nanoparticles (*ϕ *= 0), without (*N _{R }*→ ∞ (i.e., k

Comparison of - *θ'*(0) for various values of thermal radiation parameter *N*_{R }with *ϕ *= 0 (regular fluid).

Figures Figures22 and and33 illustrate the effect of nanoparticle volume fraction *ϕ *on the nanofluid velocity and temperature profile, respectively, in the case of Cu nanoparticles and water base fluid (Pr = 6.2) when *ϕ *= 0, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2, with *Ec *= 0.1, *n *= 10, and *NR *= 1. It is clear that, as the nanoparticles volume fraction increases, the nanofluid velocity decreases, and the temperature increases. These figures illustrate this agreement with the physical behavior. When the volume of nanoparticles increases, the thermal conductivity increases, and then the thermal boundary layer thickness increases. Figures Figures44 and and55 depict the effect of nonlinearly stretching sheet parameter *n *on velocity distribution *f*'(*η*) and temperature profile *θ*(*η*), respectively. Figure Figure44 illustrates that an increase of nonlinear stretching sheet parameter *n *tends to decrease the nanofluid velocity in the case of Cu-water when *n *= 0.75, 1.5, 3, 7, and 10, with *Ec *= 0.1, *N _{R }*= 1, and

The influence of nonlinear stretching sheet *n *on the skin friction at the surface -*f'' *(0) with *N _{R }*= 5, Pr = 6.2,

The problem of boundary-layer flow and heat transfer in a viscous nanofluid over a nonlinearly stretched non-isothermal moving flat surface in the presence or absence of thermal radiation using the Rosseland approximation for the radiative heat flux was analyzed. The governing partial differential equations were converted to ordinary differential equations by using a suitable similarity transformation and were then solved numerically via shooting method by employing throughout our calculations the fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme (MATLAB package). The effects of the solid volume fraction *ϕ*, thermal radiation parameter *N _{R}*, nonlinear stretching sheet parameter

1. The increase of the solid volume fraction *ϕ *and the nonlinear stretching sheet parameter *n *leads to the decrease of dimensionless surface velocity; this yields an increase in the skin friction at the surface.

2. An increment in the solid volume fraction *ϕ *and the Eckert number *Ec *yields an increment in the nanofluid's temperature; this leads to a rapid reduction in the heat transfer rates.

3. An increase in the thermal radiation parameter *N _{R }*and the nonlinear stretching sheet parameter

4. The TiO_{2 }nanoparticles proved to have the highest cooling performance for this problem than the other two types of nanoparticles (cu and Al_{2}O_{3 }nanoparticles).

*b*: constant; *C*: physical parameter related with stretched surface; *C _{f}*: skin friction coefficient;

*α*: thermal diffusivity; *η*: similarity variable; *θ*: dimensionless temperature; *μ*: effective viscosity; *υ*: kinematic viscosity; *ρ*: density; *σ**: Stefan-Boltzmann constant; (*ρC _{p}*)

*f*: fluid fraction; *nf*: nanofluid fraction; *s*: solid fraction; *w*: condition at the wall; **∞**: stream function condition at infinity.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

MRE did the major part of the article; however, the funding, computational suggestions, and proof reading were done by FSI, FMH and SMAG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

FMH and FSI are professors of applied mathematics. SMAG is a mathematics lecturer, and MR is a PhD student.

This is just a theoretical study; every experimentalist can check it experimentally with our consent.

The authors are very thankful to the editor and the reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the presentation of this paper.

- Sakiadis BC. Boundary layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: I. boundary layer equations for two dimensional and axisymmetric flows. AIChE J. 1961;7:26–28. doi: 10.1002/aic.690070108. [Cross Ref]
- Sakiadis BC. Boundary layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: II. boundary layer on a continuous flat surface. AIChE J. 1961;7:221–225. doi: 10.1002/aic.690070211. [Cross Ref]
- Kumaran V, Ramanaih G. A note on the flow over stretching sheet. Arch Mech. 1996;116:229–233.
- Magyari E, Keller B. Heat mass transfer in the boundary layers on an exponentially stretching sheet. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 1999;32:577–585. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/32/5/012. [Cross Ref]
- Elbashbeshy EMA. Heat transfer over an exponentially stretching continuous surface with suction. Arch Mech. 2001;53:643–651.
- Khan SK, Sanjayanand E. Viscoelastic boundary layer flow and heat transfer over an exponential stretching sheet. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2005;48:1534–1542. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.10.032. [Cross Ref]
- Sanjayanand E, Khan SK. On heat and mass transfer in viscoelastic boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching sheet. Int J Therm Sci. 2006;45:819–828. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.11.002. [Cross Ref]
- Sajid M, Hayat T. Influence of thermal radiation on the boundary layer flow due to an exponentially stretching sheet. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf. 2008;35:347–356. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.08.006. [Cross Ref]
- Partha MK, Murthy PVSN, Rajasekhar GP. Effect of viscous dissipation on the mixed convection of heat transfer from an exponential stretching surface. Heat Mass Transf. 2005;41:360–366. doi: 10.1007/s00231-004-0552-2. [Cross Ref]
- Vajravelu K. Viscous flow over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. A ppl Math Comput. 2001;124:281–288.
- Vajravelu K, Cannon JR. Fluid flow over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. A ppl Math Comput. 2006;181:609–618.
- Cortell R. Viscous flow and heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. A ppl Math Comput. 2007;184:864–873.
- Cortell R. Effects of viscous dissipation and radiation on the thermal boundary layer over a non-linearly stretching sheet. Phys Lett A. 2008;372:631–636. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.08.005. [Cross Ref]
- Cortell R. Similarity solutions for the flow and heat transfer of a quiescent fluid over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;203:176–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.055. [Cross Ref]
- Cortell R. Heat and fluid flow due to non-linearly stretching surfaces. Appl Math Comput. 2011;217:7564–7572. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.02.029. [Cross Ref]
- Prasad KV, Vajravelu K, Datti PS. Mixed convection heat transfer over a non-linear stretching surface with variable fluid properties. Int J Non-Linear Mech. 2010;45:320–330. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.12.003. [Cross Ref]
- Afzal N. Momentum and thermal boundary layers over a two-dimensional or axisymmetric non-linear stretching surface in a stationary fluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2010;53:540–547. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.04.039. [Cross Ref]
- Nandeppanavar MM, Vajravelu K, Abel MS, Ng C. Heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet with non-uniform heat source and variable wall temperature. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54:4960–4965. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.07.009. [Cross Ref]
- Choi SUS. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluid with nanoparticles, developments and applications of non-Newtonian flow. ASME FED. 1995;231:99–105.
- Masuda H, Ebata A, Teramae K, Hishinuma N. Alteration of thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultra-fine particles. Netsu Bussei. 1993;7:227–233. doi: 10.2963/jjtp.7.227. [Cross Ref]
- Buongiorno J, Hu W. Proceedings of ICAPP 05: May 2005. Seoul. Sydney: Curran Associates, Inc; 2005. Nanofluid coolants for advanced nuclear power plants; pp. 15–19.
- Buongiorno J. Convective transport in nanofluids. ASME J Heat Transf. 2006;128:240–250. doi: 10.1115/1.2150834. [Cross Ref]
- Kuznetsov AV, Nield DA. Natural convective boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical plate. Int J Thermal Sci. 2010;49:243–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.07.015. [Cross Ref]
- Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV. The Cheng-Minkowycz problem for natural convective boundary-layer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:5792–5795. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.024. [Cross Ref]
- Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV. The Cheng-Minkowycz problem for the double-diffusive natural convective boundary-layer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54:374–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.09.034. [Cross Ref]
- Cheng P, Minkowycz WJ. Free convection about a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium with application to heat transfer from a dike. J Geophysics Research. 1977;82(14):2040–2044. doi: 10.1029/JB082i014p02040. [Cross Ref]
- Hamad MAA, Bashir MA. Boundary-layer flow and heat transfer of a power-law non-Newtonian nanofluid over a vertical stretching sheet. World Applied Sciences J (Special Issue for Applied Mathematics) 2009;7:172–178.
- Khan WA, Pop I. Boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2010;53:2477–2483. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.01.032. [Cross Ref]
- Hamad MAA, Pop I. Scaling transformations for boundary layer flow near the stagnation-point on a heated permeable stretching surface in a porous medium saturated with a nanofluid and heat generation/absorption effects. Transp Porous Med. 2011;87:25–39. doi: 10.1007/s11242-010-9683-8. [Cross Ref]
- Hamad MAA, Ferdows M. Similarity solution of boundary layer stagnation-point flow towards a heated porous stretching sheet saturated with a nanofluid with heat absorption/generation and suction/blowing: a lie group analysis. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat. 2011;17(1):132–140.
- Kandasamy R, Loganathan P, Arasu PP. Scaling group transformation for MHD boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical stretching surface in the presence of suction/injection. Nuclear Engineering Design. 2011;241:2053–2059. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.04.011. [Cross Ref]
- Makinde OD, Aziz A. Boundary layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet with a convective boundary condition. Int J Therm Sci. 2011;50:1326–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.02.019. [Cross Ref]
- Hamad MAA. Analytical solution of natural convection flow of a nanofluid over a linearly stretching sheet in the presence of magnetic field. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2011;38:487–492. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.12.042. [Cross Ref]
- Rana P, Bhargava R. Flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid over a nonlinearly stretching sheet: a numerical study. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat. 2011;17(1):212–226.
- Nadeem S, Lee C. Boundary layer flow of nanofluid over an exponentially stretching surface. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7:94. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
- Oztop HF, Abu-Nada E. Numerical study of natural convection in partially heated rectangular enclosures filled with nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2008;29:1326–1336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.04.009. [Cross Ref]
- Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2003;46:3639–3653. doi: 10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00156-X. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Nanoscale Research Letters are provided here courtesy of **Springer**

PubMed Central Canada is a service of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) working in partnership with the National Research Council's national science library in cooperation with the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the U.S. National Library of Medicine(NCBI/NLM). It includes content provided to the PubMed Central International archive by participating publishers. |