Coal bed methane (CBM) is a form of natural gas that is trapped at large quantities in deep unmineable coal bed basins and produced from boreholes (Thielemann et al.,
2004). CBM is held at coal internal surfaces by the combination of physical sorption and hydrostatic pressure of subsurface water. Gas extraction is accomplished by pumping water from subsurface coal bed basins to the surface through drilled access wells that end within the coal bed. As water is pumped to the surface, methane is no longer held by the hydrostatic pressure in micro pore structures of coal beds and migrates from the subsurface coal into the water stream flowing to the well. At the surface, methane is separated from produced water and extracted to be used as an energy source (Wheaton and Donato,
2004). Seventy percentage of the world’s CBM production is supplied by the United States while the remainder is produced by Australia, India, Canada, China, United Kingdom, Columbia, Russia, Ukraine, and Austria primarily from shallow to deep subsurface coal beds (Flores et al.,
2008).
The production of CBM has increased dramatically, and currently supplies about 10% of the total natural gas produced annually in the U.S. (Fletcher,
2005; Petzet,
2005). The most active methane producing coal seams found in the U.S. are located in Alabama/Mississippi, Southern Colorado/New Mexico, and Montana/Wyoming (Harris et al.,
2008). CBM is produced either via microbial degradation of organic molecules (i.e., biogenic gas) or via transformation of organic matter by geochemical processes (i.e., thermogenic gas; Flores et al.,
2008). Coal deposits of the Powder River Basin (PRB) in Wyoming have emerged as having some of the most active biogenic gas production, with methane as the main constituent (85–90%; Flores et al.,
2008; Strąpoć et al.,
2008). Coal beds in the PRB basin are entirely continental, and are deposited in fresh water systems with insignificant concentrations of chloride (Van Voast,
2003). The

values and associated fractionation factors indicate microbial CO
2 reduction as the overwhelming pathway for methane generation in the PRB (Flores et al.,
2008).
Current knowledge of the indigenous microbiota residing in coal bed basins, of the role they play in mediating coal biodegradation to methane, and of the biogeochemical and physical factors that may influence biological methanogenesis is limited. Jones et al. (
2010) recently reported variations in the rates of biogenic methane production among CBM wells in the Gulf Coast Basin, Texas. Possible factors causing this interwell variability remain unknown. Only recently have subsurface microbial communities been characterized that contribute to methane production from unmined or abandoned coal beds (Shimizu et al.,
2007; Green et al.,
2008; Klein et al.,
2008; Li et al.,
2008; Midgley et al.,
2010; Penner et al.,
2010; Beckmann et al.,
2011; Guo et al.,
2012). Other studies determined the potential of these microbes to generate methane (Green et al.,
2008; Harris et al.,
2008; Jones et al.,
2008; Ulrich and Bower,
2008), as well as to characterize the metabolic pathways involved in generating methane in subsurface systems (Strąpoć et al.,
2008; Jones et al.,
2010).
Analyses of archaeal diversity based on 16S rRNA genes in subsurface coal bed basins have revealed the presence of diverse assemblages of acetoclastic, methylotrophic, and hydrogenotrophic methanogens. For example, the hydrogenotrophic genus
Methanoculleus was found together with the methylotrophic genus
Methanolobus in groundwater samples from Ishikari coal field, Hokkaido, Japan (Shimizu et al.,
2007), and
Methanolobus dominated production water in the Ordos Basin, China (Guo et al.,
2012). Members of
Methanosarcina spp., known to use a wide range of substrates (H
2/CO
2, acetate, methanol, and methylamines) were detected in a methanogenic enrichment from coal beds in Alberta, Canada (Penner et al.,
2010). While hydrogenotrophic
Methanobacterium ssp. were found in enrichment cultures from the Jharia coal field, India (Singh et al.,
2012), and Methanosarcinales (Green et al.,
2008), Methanobacteriales, and Methanococcales (Klein et al.,
2008) were discovered in the PRB, Wyoming. Some studies questioned whether members of the methanogenic community could be enhanced for methane production by manipulating temperature, pH, coal particle surface, electron acceptors or donors, or rapid release of organic substrates (Green et al.,
2008; Harris et al.,
2008; Jones et al.,
2010; Penner et al.,
2010). However, these attempts involved addition of electron acceptors or donors that might limit methanogenesis by diverting electrons away from methanogens, or, in case of enhanced organic matter release might limit methanogens by the creation of toxic conditions for methane generation within coal beds (Jones et al.,
2010).
Microbial communities in subsurface coal beds likely feed on organic and inorganic sources either deposited within the coal during coalification (coal formation process) or those that have migrated from the surface along groundwater flow paths (Krumholz et al.,
1997; Ulrich and Bower,
2008). Furthermore, trace elements (e.g., iron, nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, copper, zinc, tungstate, selenium, and boron) are crucial along with macronutrients (C, N, P, etc.), for proper growth and metabolism of microorganisms (Goodwin et al.,
1990; Takashima et al.,
1990; Lengeler et al.,
1999). Various trace element demands of microorganisms are determined by the enzymes and the proteins needed for their particular metabolisms such as CO
2 assimilation, catabolism of organic compounds, and respiration (Zhang and Gladyshev,
2009). Iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), molybdenum (Mo), and tungstate (W) are known as crucial trace elements for enzymatic activity in the methanogenic system (Takashima et al.,
1990; Zhang and Gladyshev,
2010; Glass and Orphan,
2012). Requirement and optimal concentrations of trace elements for diverse microbial metabolisms are commonly studied with pure cultures only, which are orders of magnitude higher than
in situ concentrations in most natural environments (Glass and Orphan,
2012). Although, some studies tested the effects of trace elements on methanogenesis in different anaerobic environments such as peatlands, maize silage, food industrial waste, and activated waste water sludge (Burgess et al.,
1999; Gonzalez-Gil et al.,
1999; Basiliko and Yavitt,
2001; Feng et al.,
2010; Pobeheim et al.,
2010), no studies have investigated whether methanogenesis in coal bed basins is influenced by trace elements. Two geochemical investigations of trace element chemistry across the PRB in Wyoming did not find consistent trends of trace element concentrations in CBM production waters (McBeth et al.,
2003; Jackson and Reddy,
2007).
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trace element amendments on methanogenic activity and diversity in an enrichment culture from subsurface produced CBM water. This study was designed in three phases to understand (i) the effect of varying concentrations of trace element mixtures on methane production, (ii) the effect of trace element addition on transcript levels of the gene mcrA, which encodes the α-subunit of methyl coenzyme M reductase, and (iii) the effect of trace element addition on the community structure of metabolically active methanogens.