PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 10, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2010; 31(1): 92–96.
PMCID: PMC3349218
NIHMSID: NIHMS372919
Lack of short-wavelength light during the school day delays dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) in middle school students
Mariana G. Figueiro and Mark S. Rea
Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
Correspondence to: Mariana Figueiro, Lighting Research Center, 21 Union St., Troy, NY 12180, USA. tel: +1 (518) 687-7100; fax: +1 (518) 687-7120; figuem/at/rpi.edu
OBJECTIVE
Circadian timing affects sleep onset. Delayed sleep onset can reduce sleep duration in adolescents required to awake early for a fixed school schedule. The absence of short-wavelength (“blue”) morning light, which helps entrain the circadian system, can hypothetically delay sleep onset and decrease sleep duration in adolescents. The goal of this study was to investigate whether removal of short-wavelength light during the morning hours delayed the onset of melatonin in young adults.
METHODS
Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was measured in eleven 8th-grade students before and after wearing orange glasses, which removed short-wavelength light, for a five-day school week.
RESULTS
DLMO was significantly delayed (30 minutes) after the five-day intervention, demonstrating that short-wavelength light exposure during the day can be important for advancing circadian rhythms in students.
CONCLUSIONS
Lack of short-wavelength light in the morning has been shown to delay the circadian clock in controlled laboratory conditions. The results presented here are the first to show, outside laboratory conditions, that removal of short-wavelength light in the morning hours can delay DLMO in 8th-grade students. These field data, consistent with results from controlled laboratory studies, are directly relevant to lighting practice in schools.
Keywords: daylight, melatonin, circadian system, adolescents, sleep
In terrestrial mammals, circadian rhythms are regulated by the interaction of the internal biological clock located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus with the earth’s natural 24-hour light-dark pattern (Refinetti 2006). The SCN are self-sustaining oscillators with an intrinsic period that is typically slightly longer or shorter than 24 hours. The timing of the SCN is set by the local light-dark pattern, usually ensuring that the organism’s behavioral and physiological rhythms are synchronized with its photic niche (nocturnal, diurnal, or crepuscular).
Light incident on human retinas will entrain or phase shift SCN timing, depending upon the time, duration, spectrum and intensity of the stimulus (Stevens & Rea 2001). These fundamental light characteristics affect the circadian system differently than they affect the visual system. Although we now know the human circadian system is more sensitive to light than was originally thought (Lewy et al. 1980), it is much less sensitive to light than the visual system (Rea et al. 2002). It is also well established that the human circadian system is maximally sensitive to short-wavelength (450 nm to 480 nm) light (Brainard et al. 2001, Thapan et al. 2001, and Rea et al. 2005). Most electric light sources illuminating our indoor environments are designed to support the visual system by providing relatively low levels of light dominated by wavelengths near 555 nm, the peak of the photopic luminous efficiency function (CIE 1978). Moreover, for convenience, electric light sources are available night or day and for variable durations. More and more then, people throughout the world are living under a roof illuminated by electric light sources, exposing them to dim days and extended dim light at night, separating them from the robust, natural light-dark cycle.
Studies have shown that adolescents report going to bed later as they get older (Crowley et al. 2007). These age-related changes in bedtimes have been associated with reduced parental influence on bedtimes, increased homework and extra-curricular activities, and other activities such as playing on computers and watching television. Evidence to date supports the hypothesis that adolescents have a late circadian phase, contributing to these late bed times. With a highly structured school schedule requiring early rising, these adolescents typically experience reduced sleep durations. Indeed, on unrestricted weekends, adolescents rise 1.5 to 3 hours later than they do on weekdays (Crowley et al. 2007).
Light during the day is important for entrainment; that is, for aligning circadian phase to the rest-activity cycle required by attending school. For reasons described above, however, electric lighting, including that common in schools, may not provide adequate light for circadian entrainment. Without a robust light stimulus during the day then, adolescents would logically be expected to exhibit late circadian phase and therefore go to bed late and experience restricted sleep.
Daily morning short-wavelength light exposures (after minimum core body temperature) are expected to slightly advance the clock every day and thereby maintain entrainment to the solar day (Jewett et al. 1997). The impact of reduced daily short-wavelength light exposure on the circadian system of young adults, as might be experienced by students without adequate daylight (or electric light) exposure, has never been formally investigated. A simple before-and-after, within-subjects field experiment was conducted in a school with documented good daylight design to determine whether removal of short-wavelength light on five consecutive school days would delay circadian phase relative to a baseline measurement obtained prior to the intervention.
Site
The study was conducted at Smith Middle School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina in May 2009. Smith Middle School is unusual with respect to current architectural practice in terms of the amount of daylight provided to interior spaces (LRC 2004). The building uses south-facing roof monitor skylights in most spaces to deliver daylight to the interior spaces. Diffuse toplighting prevents occlusions due to blinds or wall displays typical of sidelighting. To minimize glare from direct sunlight entering the spaces, light entering the roof monitor is baffled with cloth partitions; only diffuse light enters the conditioned room. The electric lighting system is controlled with motion sensors and photosensors that modulate the fluorescent lamp output with dimming ballasts. This strategy allows electric lights to be off most of the day for electric energy savings.
The daylighting conditions were evaluated as part of an extensive case study in 2004 (LRC 2004). On a sunny afternoon in March 2004, researchers measured light levels on several surfaces in a classroom with a calibrated illuminance meter having a photopic spectral response (CIE 1978). At the time of the site measurements, all illumination was provided by daylight. Horizontal light level measurements were made by placing the illuminance meter on desks; these ranged from 1330–2150 lux. Vertical illuminances on the chalkboard ranged from 996–1265 lux. The vertical light measurements were made by placing the illuminance meter on the chalkboard at eye level. Typical levels found in spaces illuminated only by electric light sources are approximately 80% lower. That is, these illuminance levels were approximately 5× higher than commonly found in buildings only illuminated by electric lights. Based on calculations using the model of human circadian phototransduction developed by Rea and colleagues (2005), these vertical illuminance levels would result in at least 60% melatonin suppression (at night), suggesting that the light stimulus students receive in Smith’s classrooms is strong enough to activate the circadian system. Based upon results by Zeitzer et al. (2000) who showed that the half maximum saturation for phase shifting was 80–160 lux from cool white fluorescent light sources for a 6.5 hr exposure, the light levels measured in Smith Middle School would also be highly effective for phase shifting and, therefore, entrainment. Battery-powered monitoring devices also recorded illuminances on the teacher’s desk over a long period of time. The desk was located near the perimeter of the room rather than directly under the roof monitor. These illuminance levels averaged 550 lux on sunny days and 320 lux on partly cloudy days. Based upon the previous measurements, it was expected that students at Smith Middle School would be exposed to some of the highest illuminances typically found in an indoor classroom environment, making this an appropriate site for the study.
Procedures
The within-subjects study began at the school on a Friday morning. Eleven subjects (nine males and two females, ages 13–14 years) were given an explanation about the study and were asked to wear orange glasses that attenuated all light of wavelengths shorter than about 525 nm from reaching the eyes (Figure 1) during the study period, Monday to Friday on the following week, from the time they awoke until they returned home after school (approximately 15:00); thus, subjects were required to wear the orange glasses during school and on the commute to school in the morning when they are likely to be exposed to daylight. Participants were then asked to refrain from consuming caffeinated products for the remainder of the day because saliva samples would be gathered from them in the evening. Finally, subjects were instructed to return to the school at 19:00 for saliva sample collection. The participants stayed in the dimly illuminated school library during sample collection. All electric lighting was kept off and all blinds were pulled down to avoid daylighting in the space. The room was lit with a dim red light (less than 5 lux at the cornea), during which time the participants were allowed to watch movies, play games, read or study. Serial saliva samples (Salivette, Sarstedt, Newton, NC, USA) were collected every 30 minutes (from 19:30 to 23:00) to determine DLMO. The subjects chewed on a plain cotton cylinder until saturated. These samples were then, in turn, centrifuged and refrigerated by the researcher. To prevent contamination of the saliva samples, the subjects were not allowed to eat or drink between sample times. The refrigerated samples were later sent to Pharmascan, Osceola, WI, for melatonin assay. On the next Friday evening, participants returned to school at 19:00 to repeat the saliva sample data collection in the dimly illuminated library. The study was approved by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute’s Institutional Review Board and meets the international ethical standards of this journal (Portaluppi et al. 2008).
Figure 1
Figure 1
The spectral irradiance distribution (SIR) of daylight varies continuously throughout the day at every location on the earth. Shown here is the relative SIR of one, standard phase of daylight (left ordinate), defined by CIE as illuminant D65 (Wyszecki (more ...)
DLMO, in decimal hours, was calculated for each subject using a threshold of 4.0 pg/ml. DLMO was determined by using linear interpolation between the melatonin values that fell above and below threshold. DLMO for the eleven subjects on the Friday prior to wearing the orange glasses averaged 21.15±0.61 and DLMO for the same subjects averaged 21.66±0.81 after five consecutive days of wearing the orange glasses. One subject had not achieved the threshold value (4 pg/ml) at 23:00 on the second Friday, suggesting that his DLMO occurred later than 23:00, but as a conservative estimate, we used 23:00 as his DLMO time. Using a two-tail paired students’ t-test, this difference was significant with a probability of 0.006 of a Type 1 error. Figure 2 shows the cumulative frequencies of DLMO for the participants before and after the orange glasses intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative frequencies of DLMO for the students before and after the orange glasses intervention.
In one respect the results of this field study are trivial because they simply confirm what has been shown before (Warman et al. 2003) namely that removing short-wavelength light exposure in the morning delays circadian phase. In another respect, however, the results of this study are quite important because they validate controlled laboratory findings with actual field measurements. Specifically, these data are consistent with the inference that removing short-wavelength light during school days delays circadian phase in 8th-grade students. After five consecutive school days of wearing orange glasses, DLMO was delayed by about 30 minutes. Although it is known that individual SCN clocks can have different periods, the phase delay of about 6 minutes per day observed here is consistent with the typical free-running period in humans of 24.18±0.04 hrs (Czeisler et al. 1999). Therefore, both the direction and the magnitude of the predicted effects from laboratory studies were obtained in this field study.
It has been estimated that bedtime occurs approximately two to three hours after DLMO (Burgess et al. 2003; Burgess & Fogg 2008). Since the present results showed that removing short-wavelength light during the school day will delay DLMO, sleep times are likely to be delayed as well. Wake-up times are fixed for most students, so those who do not receive short-wavelength light during the day will probably have reduced sleep on school nights. One study showed that students who had poorer performance in school were those who obtained about 25 minutes less sleep per night and went to bed on average 40 minutes later on school nights than those who were good performers (Wolfson and Carskadon 1998). By extension then, those who do not get enough short-wavelength light during the school day would exhibit reduced scholastic performance.
These findings, bridging controlled laboratory results to a real school environment, should have important, and practical, implications for school design because it seems necessary to expose students to short-wavelength light during the early part of the day to maintain entrainment. Conscious delivery of short-wavelength light in schools may be a simple, effective, non-pharmacological treatment for students to help them increase sleep duration and, perhaps, scholastic performance. Daylight in a school like that provided in Smith Middle School appears to be an ideal source to accomplish this goal because it can deliver the proper quantity and spectrum as well as the proper timing and duration of light exposure. Electric lighting could also serve this purpose, but current electric lighting is manufactured, designed and specified to meet visual requirements. Electric lighting could have an advantage over daylight for the purpose of circadian entrainment, because electric lighting can be precisely controlled, not only during the day, but during the night when exposure to light emulating daylight would be counterproductive for entrainment. Indeed, electric lighting can provide a complete 24-hour light exposure pattern to help ensure entrainment, but these deliberations represent an entirely new framework for architectural lighting design and practice (Figueiro 2008).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) for sponsoring this research. The Trans-NIH Genes, Environment and Health Initiative Grant U01 DA023822 also provided support this project. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Mary Carskadon and Dr. Stephanie Crowley of Brown University and Bradley Hospital for helping with the DLMO calculations. A. Bierman, D. Guyon, J. Brons, B. Plitnick, R. Leslie, and J. Taylor of the Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, are thanked for their assistance with this project and manuscript. We would also like to thank the staff, teachers, and principal of Smith Middle School for making this project possible. And, finally, we would like to thank the students and parents who participated in this research project.
1. Brainard G, Hanifin J, Greeson J, Byrne B, Glickman G, Gerner E, et al. Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: Evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor. J Neurosci. 2001;21:6405–6412. [PubMed]
2. Burgess HJ, Savic N, Sletten T, Roach G, Gilbert SS, Dawson D. The relationship between the dim light melatonin onset and sleep on a regular schedule in young healthy adults. Behav Sleep Med. 2003;1:102–114. [PubMed]
3. Burgess HJ, Fogg LF. Individual differences in the amount and timing of salivary melatonin secretion. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3055. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE) Light as a true visual quantity: Principles of measurement. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage; Paris: 1978.
5. Crowley SJ, Acebo C, Carskadon MA. Sleep, circadian rhythms, and delayed phase in adolescence. Sleep Med. 2007;8:602–612. [PubMed]
6. Czeisler C, Duffy JF, Shanahan TL, Brown EN, Mitchell JF, Rimmer DW, et al. Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker. Science. 1999;284:2177–2181. [PubMed]
7. Figueiro MG. A proposed 24 hour lighting scheme for older adults. Light Res Technol. 2008;40:153–160.
8. Jewett M, Rimmer DW, Duffy JF, Klerman EB, Kronauer RE, Czeisler CA. Human circadian pacemaker is sensitive to light throughout subjective day without evidence of transients. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1997;273:R1800–R1809. [PubMed]
9. Lewy AJ, Werh TA, Goodwin FK, Newsome DA, Markey SP. Light suppresses melatonin secretion in humans. Science. 1980;210:1267–1269. [PubMed]
10. Lighting Research Center. Daylight Dividends Case Study: Smith Middle School, NC. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, N.Y: 2004. p. 12.
11. Portaluppi F, Touitou Y, Smolensky MH. Ethical and methodological standards for laboratory and medical biological rhythm research. Chronobiol Int. 2008;25:999–1016. [PubMed]
12. Rea M, Figueiro MG, Bullough J. Circadian photobiology: An emerging framework for lighting practice and research. Light Res Technol. 2002;34:177–190.
13. Rea M, Figueiro MG, Bullough J, Bierman A. A model of phototransduction by the human circadian system. Brain Res Rev. 2005;50:213–228. [PubMed]
14. Refinetti R. Circadian physiology. 2. CRC Taylor & Francis; Boca Raton, London, New York: 2006.
15. Stevens R, Rea M. Light in the built environment: Potential role of circadian disruption in endocrine disruption and breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:279–287. [PubMed]
16. Thapan K, Arendt J, Skene DJ. An action spectrum for melatonin suppression: evidence for a novel non-rod, non-cone photoreceptor system in humans. J Physiol. 2001;535(Pt 1):261–267. [PubMed]
17. Warman VL, Dijk DJ, Warman GR, Arendt J, Skene DJ. Phase advancing human circadian rhythms with short wavelength light. Neurosci Lett. 2003;342(1–2):37–40. [PubMed]
18. Wolfson AR, Carskadon MA. Sleep schedules and daytime functioning in adolescents. Child Dev. 1998;69:875–887. [PubMed]
19. Wyszecki G, Stiles W. Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae. 2. John Wiley and Sons; New York: 1982. Reprinted in 2000.
20. Zeitzer J, Dijk D, Kronauer R, Brown E, Czeisler C. Sensitivity of the human circadian pacemaker to nocturnal light: Melatonin phase resetting and suppression. J Physiol. 2000;526:695–702. [PubMed]