PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbacterPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJB ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
J Bacteriol. May 2012; 194(9): 2378–2379.
PMCID: PMC3347079
Whole-Genome Sequences of Bacillus subtilis and Close Relatives
Ashlee M. Earl,a* Mark Eppinger,b W. Florian Fricke,b M. J. Rosovitz,c* David A. Rasko,b Sean Daugherty,b Richard Losick,d Roberto Kolter,a and Jacques Ravelcorresponding authorb
aHarvard Medical School, Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
bInstitute for Genome Sciences (IGS), University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
cJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
dHarvard University, Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Address correspondence to Jacques Ravel, jravel/at/som.umaryland.edu.
*Present address: Ashlee M. Earl, The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Genome Sequencing & Analysis Program, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; M. J. Rosovitz, National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC), Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Received June 30, 2011; Accepted February 13, 2012.
Abstract
We sequenced four strains of Bacillus subtilis and the type strains for two closely related species, Bacillus vallismortis and Bacillus mojavensis. We report the high-quality Sanger genome sequences of B. subtilis subspecies subtilis RO-NN-1 and AUSI98, B. subtilis subspecies spizizenii TU-B-10T and DV1-B-1, Bacillus mojavensis RO-H-1T, and Bacillus vallismortis DV1-F-3T.
Bacillus subtilis is a model Gram-positive ubiquitous soil bacterium capable of forming endospores. Since its discovery in Marburg, Germany, in the late 1800s, there have been thousands of publications addressing various aspects of B. subtilis biology, leading to a level of understanding of this microbe that is virtually unparalleled in the life sciences. The genomes presented here will enable in-depth investigation of B. subtilis sequence variation and detailed whole-genome comparisons of this important model species.
Strains were selected for sequencing to represent phylogenetically diverse groups within and closely related to the B. subtilis species, including the type strains for these groups. B. subtilis subspecies subtilis strains RO-NN-1 (4,011,949 bp) (GenBank accession no. CP002906) and AUSI98 (128 contigs) (GenBank accession no. AFSF00000000) were isolated from soils originating from the Mojave Desert in Rosamond, CA, and Salzburg, Austria, respectively (10, 14). These isolates are closely related to the well-known laboratory strain B. subtilis 168T, the type strain for the B. subtilis subspecies (1, 17), as well as the recently sequenced strains BSn5 and BEST195 (3, 11). TU-B-10T (4,207,222 bp) (GenBank accession no. CP002905), the type strain for Bacillus subtilis subspecies spizizenii (10, 14), and DV1-B-1 (20 contigs) (GenBank accession no. AFSG00000000) (15) are closely related to the recently sequenced laboratory strain W23 and marine strain gtP20b (7, 18). TU-B-10T and DV1-B-1 were isolated from soils collected near Nefta, Tunisia, and Death Valley National Monument, CA (10, 14, 15), respectively. Bacillus vallismortis DV1-F-3T (94 contigs) (GenBank accession no. AFSH00000000) is the type strain for this B. subtilis close relative and was also isolated from Death Valley National Monument, CA (14, 16). RO-H-1T (45 contigs) (GenBank accession no. AFSI00000000) represents the type strain for Bacillus mojavensis, another B. subtilis close relative that was isolated from Mojave Desert soil in Rosamond, CA (15).
Genomic DNA was subjected to random whole-genome Sanger or hybrid Sanger-454 shotgun sequencing and closure strategies as previously described (6). Plasmid (pHOS2) and fosmid (pCC1fos) libraries were constructed with target insert sizes of 3 to 5, 10 to 12, and 30 to 39 kb. Sequences were assembled using the Celera assembler (8). All genomes were manually annotated using the Manatee system (http://manatee.sourceforge.net/). These genomes exhibit a high degree of proteome conservation and syntenic genome architectures (2, 12, 13). The synteny appears to be well conserved even in more distantly related bacilli (5, 7, 9). However, each strain harbors numerous strain-specific regions that are found interspersed throughout the conserved genomic backbone. Such strain-specific regions vary enormously in size (1 kb to 100 kb), the majority being smaller than 5 kb. Genomic islands harbor secondary metabolism and developmental genes (e.g., sporulation and competence), suggesting that these pathways are plastic, subject to environmental selection, which may explain how B. subtilis has become so broadly adapted to different ecological niches (4).
Access to these high-quality genome sequences and their comparative analyses with multiple genomes from B. subtilis and close relatives will expand our understanding of gene flow and speciation among sympatric soil bacilli. Understanding the genetic diversity and genome dynamics in the bacilli will further aid experimental analyses of this important model species and allow insights into the physiology, ecology, and evolution of the group.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
Strains have been deposited in the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center and ARS (NRRL) Culture Collection under accession numbers BGSCID 3A27 and NRRL B-14823 (RO-NN-1), BGSCID 3A26 (AUSI98), BGSCID 2A11T and NRRL B-23049T (TU-B-10T), BGSCID 2A12 and NRRL B-23054 (DV1-B-1), BGSCID 28A5 and NRRL B-14698 (RO-H-1T), and BGSCID 28A4 and NRRL B-14890 (DV1-F-3T).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The genome sequencing projects were supported with funds from National Science Foundation grant NSF-EF-0523471 and the University of Maryland School of Medicine.
We thank John Perkins, Patrick Eichenberger, Dan Kearns, John D. Helmann, Tina Henkin, Jeff Meisner, Matthias Schmalish, Yunrong (Win) Chai, Michael D'Elia, Jenny Auchtung, Adam Breier, Heiko Liesegang, Evert-Jan Blom, Michiel de Hoon, and Claudio Aguilar for their contributions to the annotation of the genomes.
1. Barbe V, et al. 2009. From a consortium sequence to a unified sequence: the Bacillus subtilis 168 reference genome a decade later. Microbiology 155:1758–1775. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 14:1394–1403. [PubMed]
3. Deng Y, et al. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis BSn5, an endophytic bacterium of Amorphophallus konjac with antimicrobial activity for the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. J. Bacteriol. 193:2070–2071. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Earl AM, Losick R, Kolter R. 2008. Ecology and genomics of Bacillus subtilis. Trends Microbiol. 16:269–275. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Eppinger M, et al. 2011. Genome sequences of the biotechnologically important Bacillus megaterium strains QM B1551 and DSM319. J. Bacteriol. 193:4199–4213. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Eppinger M, et al. 2010. Genome sequence of the deep-rooted Yersinia pestis strain Angola reveals new insights into the evolution and pangenome of the plague bacterium. J. Bacteriol. 192:1685–1699. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Fan L, et al. 2011. Genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii gtP20b, isolated from the Indian ocean. J. Bacteriol. 193:1276–1277. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Huson DH, et al. 2001. Design of a compartmentalized shotgun assembler for the human genome. Bioinformatics 17(Suppl 1):S132–S139. [PubMed]
9. Kunst F, et al. 1997. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390:249–256. [PubMed]
10. Nakamura LK, Roberts MS, Cohan FM. 1999. Relationship of Bacillus subtilis clades associated with strains 168 and W23: a proposal for Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis subsp. nov. and Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii subsp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49(Pt 3):1211–1215. [PubMed]
11. Nishito Y, et al. 2010. Whole genome assembly of a natto production strain Bacillus subtilis natto from very short read data. BMC Genomics 11:243. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Rasko DA, Myers GS, Ravel J. 2005. Visualization of comparative genomic analyses by BLAST score ratio. BMC Bioinformatics 6:2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Rissman AI, et al. 2009. Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve aligner. Bioinformatics 25:2071–2073. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Roberts MS, Cohan FM. 1995. Recombination and migration rates in natural populations of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus mojavensis. Evolution 49:1081–1094.
15. Roberts MS, Nakamura LK, Cohan FM. 1994. Bacillus mojavensis sp. nov., distinguishable from Bacillus subtilis by sexual isolation, divergence in DNA sequence, and differences in fatty acid composition. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44:256–264. [PubMed]
16. Roberts MS, Nakamura LK, Cohan FM. 1996. Bacillus vallismortis sp. nov., a close relative of Bacillus subtilis, isolated from soil in Death Valley, California. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:470–475. [PubMed]
17. Srivatsan A, et al. 2008. High-precision, whole-genome sequencing of laboratory strains facilitates genetic studies. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Zeigler DR. 2011. The genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii W23: insights into speciation within the B. subtilis complex and into the history of B. subtilis genetics. Microbiology 157(Pt 7):2033–2041. [PubMed]
Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)