PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC Sep 15, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3343696
NIHMSID: NIHMS351604
Phase Transitions in the Assembly of Multi-Valent Signaling Proteins
Pilong Li,1,7 Sudeep Banjade,1,7 Hui-Chun Cheng,1,7 Soyeon Kim,1 Baoyu Chen,1 Liang Guo,2 Marc Llaguno,3 Javoris V. Hollingsworth,4 David S. King,5 Salman F. Banani,1 Paul S. Russo,4 Qiu-Xing Jiang,3 B. Tracy Nixon,6 and Michael K. Rosen1
1Department of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-8812, USA
2BioCAT of IIT at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
3Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9148, USA
4Department of Chemistry and Macromolecular Studies Group, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
5Howard Hughes Medical Institute Mass Spectrometry Laboratory and Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Correspondence to Michael K. Rosen: Michael.Rosen/at/utsouthwestern.edu Telephone: 214-645-6361
7Equal contributions
Cells are organized on length scales ranging from Angstroms to microns. However, the mechanisms by which Angstrom-scale molecular properties are translated to micron-scale macroscopic properties are not well understood. Here we show that interactions between diverse, synthetic multivalent macromolecules (including multi-domain proteins and RNA) produce sharp, liquid-liquid demixing phase separations, generating micron-sized liquid droplets in aqueous solution. This macroscopic transition corresponds to a molecular transition between small complexes and large, dynamic supramolecular polymers. The concentrations needed for phase transition are directly related to valency of the interacting species. In the case of the actin regulatory protein, neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein (N-WASP) interacting with its established biological partners Nck and phosphorylated nephrin1, the phase transition corresponds to a sharp increase in activity toward the actin nucleation factor, Arp2/3 complex. The transition is governed by the degree of phosphorylation of nephrin, explaining how this property of the system can be controlled to regulatory effect by kinases. The widespread occurrence of multivalent systems suggests that phase transitions are likely used to spatially organize and biochemically regulate information throughout biology.
Covalent and non-covalent interactions between multivalent small molecules are central elements of classical polymer chemistry/physics and supramolecular chemistry2,3,4. These fields have produced theories and experimental demonstrations of sharp transitions between small assemblies and macroscopic polymer gels (sol-gel transitions) as the degree of bonding increases. The transition point (critical point) depends on physical properties of the monomeric species such as valency and affinity. The polymer can have a variety of physical forms, ranging from phase-separated liquid to crystalline solid. For non-covalent systems, phase separation can strongly influence the sol-gel transition by altering the degree of bonding5,6. In biology, interactions between multivalent entities are found in many processes, ranging from extracellular carbohydrate-lectin binding to intracellular signaling to RNA metabolism to chromatin organization in the nucleus7,8,9,10. Biological multivalency has been studied most extensively in the context of extracellular ligands binding to cell surface receptors, where antibody-receptor11 and carbohydrate-lectin7 systems can assemble into crosslinked networks. These networks are typically precipitates11,12, but liquid-like gels have also been described13. Multivalency has been less studied in the context of intracellular molecules, which often share characteristics of high valency, modest affinity and long, flexible connections between binding elements14. Here we asked whether these systems also undergo sharp transitions to polymer, and if so, what the macroscopic properties of the polymer are, and how such transitions could be regulated and affect function.
Initially we examined interactions between the Src homology 3 (SH3) domain and its proline-rich motif (PRM) ligand, two widely observed modules that often appear in tandem arrays in signaling proteins8,14. We generated two classes of engineered proteins, one composed of repeats of a single SH3 domain (SH3m, m=1–5) and a second composed of repeats of a PRM ligand (PRMn, n=1–5; KD = 350 μM for the SH31-PRM1 interaction; Supplementary Fig. 1). Initially we mixed SH34 with PRM4. At low concentrations the solutions were clear, while at high concentrations they were opalescent. Examination of such opalescent solutions using light microscopy revealed the presence of numerous spherical droplets, ~1 μm to >50 μm in diameter, that had phase separated from the bulk solution (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 2). Smaller droplets tended to coalesce into larger droplets over time, consistent with liquid-like properties (Fig. 1b). When the proteins were mixed in 1:1 ratio, both the droplet and bulk phases contained equal amounts of each molecule. But the proteins are concentrated ~100-fold in the droplets relative to the bulk (Fig. 1a, right; 116-fold for SH35+PRM5, 82-fold for a SH35 plus an octameric dendrimer, PRM(N-WASP)8). Analogous droplets were also observed with an unrelated SH35-ligand5 pair and with the tetravalent RNA binding protein, PTB, interacting with an RNA oligonucleotide (Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, liquid-liquid demixing phase transitions may be widely observed in intracellular multivalent systems.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Macroscopic and microscopic phase transitions in multivalent SH3+PRM systems
A large body of data indicates that the phase separation observed here is driven by assembly of the multivalent proteins into large species, analogous to behavior observed in many small molecule polymer systems2,5 and also with covalent protein crosslinking15. First, the phase boundary is strongly dependent on valency of the interacting species (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 4). This observation is consistent with theory and our simulations, which indicate that higher valency enables formation of larger species at lower fractional saturation of binding modules2,3,5,16 (Supplementary Simulations and Theory, Supplementary Figs. 5–7). Second, the phase transition can be blocked by a high affinity monovalent ligand, PRM(H)1 (KD = 10 μM for SH31 binding PRM(H)1; Supplementary Fig. 8). Third, we used dynamic light scattering (DLS) and small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) to characterize the species formed during titrations of PRM proteins into SH35 (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Figs. 10–12). Below their concentrations needed for droplet formation, both PRM2 and PRM4 substantially increased the apparent hydrodynamic radius (Rh, for DLS) and apparent radius of gyration (Rg, for SAXS), suggesting the formation of oligomeric species. For equal total module concentrations, PRM4 caused larger increases than did PRM2, consistent with predictions from polymer theory2,3,5,16. For higher concentrations, we removed droplets by centrifugation, and found that increasing PRM2 and PRM4 caused Rh and Rg to decrease in the bulk phase, suggesting that larger species partitioned selectively into the droplet phase. This behavior resembles that observed in sol-gel transitions of covalent polymers, where above the critical extent of reaction the average size of oligomers in the sol phase decreases, because larger species preferentially join the gel2. Titrations with PRM1 or PRM(H)1, which unlike PRM2 and PRM4 cannot generate polymers and did not cause phase separation, produced only small, saturable increases in Rh and Rg. Together these data indicate that phase separation is driven by the unique ability of multivalent SH3m-PRMn interactions to create large assemblies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multivalency drives phase separation and likely a sol-gel transition in the droplet phase
Additional data suggest that the multivalent proteins have formed large polymers within the droplets, such that the phase transition likely coincides with a sol-gel transition. First, at the extremely high concentrations in the droplet phase, the fractional saturation of SH3/PRM binding sites is estimated to be 3–5-fold higher than that needed to induce the sol-gel transition16 (Supplementary Materials, Cyclization). Second, DLS analyses of droplet phases created by SH3m/PRMn mixtures showed multi-phasic intensity autocorrelation curves with a complex distribution of relaxation times spanning 0.2–20 ms (Supplementary Fig. 13) or beyond (Fig. 2c). Some of these relaxation times scale non-linearly with the square of scattering angle (q2, Supplementary Fig. 13). The wide range of timescales, presence of long timescale processes and q2-independence of some of these processes are typical of polymer solutions in the semi-dilute range, but highly atypical of discrete molecular species17. Third, photobleaching studies showed that the diffusion of the droplet constituents is slowed by ~3 orders of magnitude relative to free diffusion in water (not shown). Further, the photobleaching recovery rate correlates inversely with monomer-monomer affinity and valency (Supplementary Fig. 14), suggesting that recovery represents reorganization of a polymer matrix. Small molecule fluorophores and EGFP can enter and move rapidly within the droplets (Supplementary Fig. 15). Finally, electron cryo-microscopic images of SH35+PRM5 solutions flash frozen immediately after mixing showed numerous round, electron dense objects with diameters of 50~500 nm (Fig. 2d; Supplementary Fig. 16). These objects were not observed with high concentrations of either SH35 or PRM5 alone, or with the two components mixed below the droplet concentration. Although the objects were too dense to observe structures within them, their edges were highly irregular on the ~10 nm scale, suggesting they contained large but disordered molecular species, consistent with a crosslinked gel. These characterizations of the droplet phase suggest that it contains large polymeric species and likely has undergone a sol-gel transition.
Together our data suggest a model in which association of multivalent proteins produces macroscopic liquid-liquid phase separation, which is thermodynamically coupled to a molecular sol-gel transition within the droplet phase. The sharp transition between small complex and polymer is consistent with condensation polymerization theory2,3,6, and our own particle-based simulations (Supplementary Fig. 5). A theoretical analysis of these systems (Supplementary Simulations and Theory) indicates that the polymerization process is driven appreciably by the extremely high configurational entropy of the polymer6,18.
The behavior we observe for these multivalent systems in vitro is mirrored in cells. Co- expression of mCherry-SH35 and eGFP-PRM5 in HeLa cells results in formation of 0.5~2 μm diameter, cytoplasmic puncta containing both fluorophores (Fig. 3a). Puncta are not observed in cells expressing either protein alone, or in cells co-expressing mCherry-SH35 + eGFP-PRM3, indicating that their formation is dependent on interaction between the two high-valent molecules. The puncta do not stain with a large range of vesicle markers or a lipid dye, suggesting they are phase-separated bodies rather than vesicular structures (Supplementary Fig. 18). Both mCherry and eGFP fluorescence of the bodies recover in ~10 seconds after photobleaching (Fig. 3b), indicating rapid exchange of both components with the surrounding cytoplasm and suggesting a dynamic, liquid-like nature. Thus, interactions between multi-valent proteins can produce phase separated liquid droplets both in vitro and in cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Co-expression of SH35 and PRM5 in cells produces dynamic puncta
The nephrin/Nck/N-WASP system constitutes a natural, three-component interaction to investigate phase transitions resulting from multi-valent interactions, and their functional consequences (Fig. 4a). In kidney podocytes, the transmembrane protein nephrin plays a central role in forming the glomerular filtration barrier, acting partly through assembling cortical actin1. The cytoplasmic tail of nephrin contains three tyrosine phosphorylation (pY) sites, which can each bind the SH2 domain of Nck1,19. Nck contains three SH3 domains which can bind the ~six PRMs in the proline-rich region of N-WASP20. N-WASP, in turn stimulates actin filament nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex. Multivalency in nephrin or Nck is necessary for proper actin assembly19, and together with multivalency in N-WASP has potential to cause phase transitions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phase transition correlates to biochemical activity transition in the nephrin/Nck/N-WASP system
Addition of Nck to an N-WASP construct (GBD-P-VCA, Supplementary Table 1; called N-WASP hereafter) causes droplet formation as in the model systems above (Fig. 4b). Addition of a di-phosphorylated nephrin tail peptide (2pY) drops the phase boundary for both proteins by ≥2-fold (Fig. 4c), presumably because the effective valency of Nck increases when arrayed on nephrin. This effect is even more pronounced when nephrin 3pY peptide is added (to the same total pY concentration) (Fig. 4d). Thus, in cells kinases could regulate phase transitions in this system (and cooperative assembly of all three proteins) by controlling the degree of phosphorylation of nephrin, and consequently shifting the phase boundary from μM (Fig. 4b) to nM (Fig. 4d) regimes. We note that where measured, the cytoplasmic concentrations of WASP and other actin regulatory proteins are typically 1-10 μM, indicating that shifts in this range could be functionally important (Supplementary Fig. 19).
We next asked how droplet formation affects the ability of the nephrin/Nck/N-WASP system to stimulate Arp2/3-mediated actin assembly. We measured the half time to completion (t1/2) of pyrene-actin assembly reactions containing fixed concentrations of the Arp2/3 complex, Nck, nephrin 3pY peptide and N-WASP, plus variable amounts of an N-WASP truncation mutant (N-WASPΔ) that contains the full proline-rich region, can assemble into polymers, but cannot bind the Arp2/3 complex. In the absence of N-WASPΔ, the 50 nM N-WASP produces only weak stimulation of the Arp2/3 complex (long t1/2) (Fig. 4e). Addition of N-WASPΔto concentrations between 0–750 nM has no effect on actin assembly. But 1000 nM N-WASPΔ sharply increases activation of the Arp2/3 complex. Activity increases asymptotically as N-WASPΔ is further raised. N- WASPΔ has no effect on an N-WASP protein that lacks the proline-rich region, suggesting that engagement by Nck is needed for the enhancement of activity (Supplementary Fig. 20). These data are consistent with switch-like formation of a higher activity21,22, likely polymeric, form of nephrin/Nck/N-WASP when the total concentration of wild type (active) plus truncated (inactive) N-WASP surpasses that needed for droplet formation. The sharp transition is followed by slower increases in activity as additional N-WASPΔ draws a greater percentage of the wild type protein into the droplets/polymer. Consistent with these ideas, when reactions containing N-WASP above its phase separation concentration are stained with phalloidin, numerous actin filament bundles are observed within the droplets (Fig. 4f). In cells, nephrin is transmembrane, and the system would produce not a three dimensional polymer phase as observed here, but rather its two dimensional equivalent at the plasma membrane. Such interactions may contribute to formation and/or stability of the micron-scale clusters of nephrin and Nck, with associated actin tails, which are observed in cells upon nephrin crosslinking (and consequent phosphorylation)1. Of the 28 known binding partners of the Nck SH2 domain, 14 are predicted or demonstrated to contain three or more pY binding sites23,24, suggesting that analogous pY/Nck/N-WASP assembly may occur in many systems.
Sharp phase transitions occurring concomitantly with sol-gel transitions may be a general feature of multivalent systems in biology. Many “cellular bodies” — sub-cellular compartments that are compositionally distinct from the surrounding cytoplasm or nucleoplasm, but are not membrane-bound25,26 – are enriched in multivalent proteins and nucleic acids9,27. These include promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies, Cajal bodies, P bodies and P granules27,28,29. Moreover, P granules in the C. elegans embryo were recently shown to have liquid-like properties with many of the features that we have observed here, including switch-like formation and greatly slowed diffusion of constituent molecules30. Many multivalent proteins in general can organize into puncta in the cytosol or at membranes (Supplementary Fig. 21). Within these objects the physical properties of a polymer could impart micron-scale structural and dynamic organization, and control chemistry (e.g. catalysis, interactions, structural rearrangements). Our findings provide a mechanism by which multivalent interactions could potentially yield sharp transitions between physically and functionally distinct states, generating non-linearity in signaling pathways, connecting disparate length scales in the cell, and perhaps contributing to the structure and function of cellular bodies and other two- and three-dimensional compartments.
Material generation
In vitro phase separation
Samples were incubated for >12 hours before scoring for droplets using bright-field microscopy; when observed, droplets formed immediately after mixing. For in vitro FRAP experiments, a 5 μm diameter spot was bleached in OG-SH34-containing droplets >20 μm in diameter using a 488 nm laser line. Mean intensity of the bleached spot was fit to a single exponential.
DLS and SAXS
For titrations monitored by DLS (DynaPro, Wyatt) and SAXS (Advanced Photon Source, BioCAT beamline), samples contained 170 μM SH35 plus PRM proteins at PRM:SH3 module ratios of 0–5. Droplets were removed from all relevant samples by centrifugation (16,000 g, 10 minutes) before analysis. For SH35+PRM(N-WASP)8 and SH35+PRM5 droplets, single angle DLS data were collected on a DynaPro instrument (Wyatt), and multi-angle DLS data were collected on a custom build apparatus, respectively.
Electron cryo-microscopy
Samples were blotted and frozen immediately after mixing, and imaged under low-dose cryo conditions in a JEOL 2200FS FEG transmission electron microscope, using a 2Kx2K Tietz slowscan CCD camera.
Cellular assays
HeLa cells were imaged at 32 °C 24 hours after transfection with vectors expressing mCherry-SH35 and/or eGFP-PRM5 (or eGFP-PRM3). Images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. For FRAP experiments, individual mCherry-SH35/eGFP-PRM5 puncta were bleached with a 488 nm laser line.
Actin polymerization
4 μM actin (5% pyrene labeled) was polymerized in the presence of 3 μM nephrin 3pY, 10 μM Nck, 50 nM N-WASP, and 10 nM Arp2/3 complex plus increasing concentrations of N-WASPΔ in 150KMEI buffer as described21. Imaging was performed on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope after adding rhodamine-actin (10 % labeled, 4 μM), 300 nM Alexa 488 phalloidin and 10 nM Arp2/3 complex to droplets containing 3 μM nephrin 3pY, 10 μM Nck and 2 μM N-WASP.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Jose Onuchic and Shae Padrick for discussion of theoretical aspects of this study, Dr. Luke Rice for sharing his fluorescence microscope, Dr. Mike Socolich for a gift of purified EGFP, Drs. Kate Luby-Phelps and Abhijit Bugde for advice on FRAP experiments, Dr. Shae Padrick and Lynda Doolittle for help in purifying actin and the Arp2/3 complex and for sharing reagents, Drs. Nick Grishin and Shuoyong Shi for help with database searches, Dr. Kristen Lynch for providing the PTB expression construct, Drs. Dan Billadeau and Timothy Gomez for providing antibodies, Drs. Arati Ramesh, Wade Winkler and Pei-Ling Tsai for advice on RNA experiments, Kole Roybal and Dr. Christoph Wülfing for sharing unpublished data, and Dr. Jun Liu (UT Health Science Center, Houston) for help with electron cryotomography. Work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and grants from the NIH (R01-GM56322) and Welch Foundation (I–1544) to M.K.R.; Chilton Foundation Fellowship to H.-C. C.; NIH EUREKA award (R01-GM088745) to Q.-X.J.; NIH Cancer Biology T32 Training Grant to M.L.; NSF award (DMR-1005707) to P.S.R.; Gates Millennium Fund award to J.V.H. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, under contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38. BioCAT is a National Institutes of Health-supported Research Center RR-08630.
Footnotes
Author Contributions
M.K.R. oversaw project, helped analyze all data, and wrote the paper with assistance from all authors. P.L., H-.C.C., M.K.R. conceived of the project. P.L. developed and interpreted the theoretical and computational models, which promoted much of the experimentation. S.B. performed and analyzed experiments on the nephrin/Nck/N- WASP system, and performed monovalent competition studies. H-.C.C. mapped and analyzed phase diagrams, and collected FRAP data, on the engineered model systems. S.K. performed and analyzed cellular experiments. S.B., B.C., L.G., B.T.N. collected and/or analyzed SAXS data. S.B., M.L., Q-.X. J. collected and/or analyzed electron microscopy data. S.B., J.V.H., P.S.R. collected and/or analyzed multi-angle-DLS data. H-.C.C., S.B. collected and analyzed single angle DLS data. D.S.K. synthesized octameric PRM dendrimer. S.F.B. analyzed cyclization in the sol-gel transition.
1. Jones N, et al. Nck adaptor proteins link nephrin to the actin cytoskeleton of kidney podocytes. Nature. 2006;440:818–823. [PubMed]
2. Flory PJ. Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Cornell University Press; 1953.
3. Cohen RJ, Benedek GB. Equilibrium and Kinetic Theory of Polymerization and the Sol-Gel Transition. J Phys Chem. 1982;86:3696–3714.
4. Lehn JM. Supramolecular Polymer Chemistry--Scope and Perspectives. Polym Int. 2002;51:825–839.
5. Tanaka F. Polymer Physics: Applications to Molecular Association and Thermoreversible Gelation. Cambridge University Press; 2011.
6. Semenov AN, Rubinstein M. Thermoreversible gelation in solutions of associative polymers. 1 Statics. Macromolecules. 1998;31:1373–1385.
7. Brewer CF, Miceli MC, Baum LG. Clusters, bundles, arrays and lattices: novel mechanisms for lectin-saccharide-mediated cellular interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2002;12:616–623. [PubMed]
8. Pawson T, Nash P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science. 2003;300:445–452. [PubMed]
9. Lunde BM, Moore C, Varani G. RNA-binding proteins: modular design for efficient function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:479–490. [PubMed]
10. Ruthenburg AJ, Li H, Patel DJ, Allis CD. Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:983–994. [PubMed]
11. Goldberg R. A theory of antibody-antigen reactions. I Theory for reactions of multivalent antigen with bivalent and univalent antibody. J Am Chem Soc. 1952;74:5715–5725.
12. Dam TK, et al. Thermodynamic, kinetic, and electron microscopy studies of concanavalin A and Dioclea grandiflora lectin cross-linked with synthetic divalent carbohydrates. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:8640–8646. [PubMed]
13. Sisu C, et al. The influence of ligand valency on aggregation mechanisms for inhibiting bacterial toxins. Chembiochem. 2009;10:329–337. [PubMed]
14. Jin J, et al. Eukaryotic protein domains as functional units of cellular evolution. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra76. [PubMed]
15. Asherle N, et al. Oligomerization and phase separation in globular protein solutions. Biophys Chem. 1998;75:213–227. [PubMed]
16. Stockmayer WH. Molecular Distribution in Condensation Polymers. J Polymer Sci. 1952;9:69–71.
17. Li J, Ngai T, Wu C. The Slow Relaxation Mode: From Solutions to Gel Networks. Polym J. 2010;42:609–625.
18. Semenov A, Charlot A, Auzely-Velty R, Rinaudo M. Rheological properties of binary associating polymers. Rheologica Acta. 2007;46:541–568.
19. Blasutig IM, et al. Phosphorylated YDXV motifs and Nck SH2/SH3 adaptors act cooperatively to induce actin reorganization. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:2035–2046. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Rohatgi R, Nollau P, Ho HY, Kirschner MW, Mayer BJ. Nck and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate synergistically activate actin polymerization through the N-WASP-Arp2/3 pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:26448–26452. [PubMed]
21. Padrick SB, et al. Hierarchical regulation of WASP/WAVE proteins. Mol Cell. 2008;32:426–438. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Padrick SB, Rosen MK. Physical mechanisms of signal integration by WASP family proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:707–735. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Lettau M, Pieper J, Janssen O. Nck adaptor proteins: functional versatility in T cells. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2009;7:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Obenauer JC, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB. Scansite 2.0: Proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3635–3641. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Matera AG, Izaguire-Sierra M, Praveen K, Rajendra TK. Nuclear bodies: random aggregates of sticky proteins or crucibles of macromolecular assembly? Dev Cell. 2009;17:639–647. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Buchan JR, Parker R. Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation. Mol Cell. 2009;36:932–941. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Parker R, Sheth U. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol Cell. 2007;25:635–646. [PubMed]
28. Matera AG, Shpargel KB. Pumping RNA: nuclear bodybuilding along the RNP pipeline. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006;18:317–324. [PubMed]
29. Bernardi R, Pandolfi PP. Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:1006–1016. [PubMed]
30. Brangwynne CP, et al. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science. 2009;324:1729–1732. [PubMed]