The
Drosophila VHL (
dVHL) was identified by amino-acid sequence homology query against the newly deposited fly genomic sequence in the late 1990s (
Adryan et al., 2000). The dVHL protein was shown to interact with
Drosophila elongin C
in vitro. A similar strategy was used and the same
dVHL sequence was identified independently at about the same time (
Aso et al., 2000). The latter study showed that dVHL protein could form complex with the human Cul-2, human elongin B and C and mouse Rbx-1, but not with the human elongin A. Thus, the ubiquitin ligase function of pVHL is conserved in insects. Later,
Arquier et al. (2006) showed that
dVHL is involved in degradation of hydroxylated oxygen-dependent degradation domain of either the human HIF-1α or the
Drosophila homolog Sima in normoxia, and that the oxygen-dependent degradation–GFP fusion protein is stabilized in hypoxia
in vivo.
The first phenotypic analyses (
Adryan et al., 2000) utilized the then new but promising RNA interference technology.
dVHL was in fact one of the first
Drosophila genes studied using siRNA-mediated knockdown.
Drosophila contains a vascular system, the trachea, for transporting oxygen, which is capable of oxygen sensing (
Jarecki et al., 1999;
Wingrove and O’Farrell, 1999). On the other hand, the Malpighian tubes perform excretory and osmoregulatory functions similar to those of the vertebrate kidneys. There was therefore much speculation as to which of these systems will be affected in
dVHL mutant. As it turned out, injection of
dVHL-specific siRNA into pre-blastoderm embryos resulted in ectopic looping and branching in the trachea, but not in the Malpighian tubes (
Adryan et al., 2000). Importantly, injection of either
dVHL or human
VHL sense RNA into wild-type embryos blocked tracheal branch migration. These reciprocal experiments demonstrated that
VHL could negatively regulate vascular cell motility.
The function of
VHL was further explored in the
Drosophila system by analyzing the genomic knockout of the endogenous
dVHL gene (
Hsouna et al., 2010). Homozygous
dVHL mutant is lethal at the early larval stage and exhibits profound tracheal phenotypes, consistent with the earlier RNA interference study. Surprisingly, the lethality could be rescued by re-expressing
dVHL specifically in the trachea, indicating that modulation of vascular development is the main developmental function of
dVHL. This notion is consistent with the earlier mouse knockout phenotype (
Gnarra et al., 1997) and was later confirmed in zebrafish (
van Rooijen et al., 2010). In both flies and vertebrates, the key defining process in vasculogenesis is the outgrowth of branches, regulated by growth factor signaling pathways. In
Drosophila embryo
, the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathway is utilized (
Ghabrial et al., 2003;
Uv et al., 2003;
Akis and Madaio, 2004) to pattern the trachea in a stereotyped fashion. The tracheal phenotype in
dVHL mutant resembled that resulting from over-active FGF receptor (FGFR) signaling (
Dammai et al., 2003). Indeed, FGFR-ERK-Ets1 signaling pathway is over-activated in
dVHL mutant tracheal cells, which is the result of accumulated FGFR on the mutant tracheal cell surface (
Hsouna et al., 2010). Genetic epistasis analysis indicates that the surface accumulation of FGFR is the result of defective endocytic pathway and that dVHL functionally interacts with and stabilizes Abnormal Wing Discs (AWD), the homolog of human anti-metastasis factor Nm23, which has been shown to regulate endocytosis (
Dammai et al., 2003;
Hsu et al., 2006;
Nallamothu et al., 2008,
2009;
Woolworth et al., 2009) in part by stabilizing Rab5 (
Woolworth et al., 2009). The detailed phenotypic analysis also revealed that the endocytic function of
dVHL not only regulates cell motility but also controls the size and length of the tubule lumen (
Hsouna et al., 2010). Formation of the tracheal lumen, and likely of other tubule systems in mammals, is controlled by secretion (exocytosis) of matrix material and, at the maturation phase, reabsorption through endocytosis of these structural materials (
Behr et al., 2007;
Tsarouhas et al., 2007). Mutations in
dVHL result in defective endocytosis of the lumenal chitin and consequently, enlarged and tortuous lumen of the trachea. This phenotype can be reduced or exacerbated by expression of constitutively active Rab5 or dominant-negative Rab5, respectively. Interestingly, ectopic branching and dilated tubule phenotypes were also observed in the mouse
Vhl knockout kidney tubules (
Hsouna et al., 2010).
We also showed that specific regulation of FGFR internalization is evolutionarily conserved. In
VHL mutant human ccRCC cells and primary human endothelial cells knocked down with
VHL-specific RNA duplex, FGFR over-accumulates on the cell surface, leading to increased FGFR, ERK and Ets1 transcription factor activation, elevated cell motility and increased angiogenic potential
in vitro (
Hsu et al., 2006;
Champion et al., 2008). In addition, heterozygous
Vhl knockout mouse shows increased angiogenic response toward bFGF
in vivo (
Champion et al., 2008). Importantly, this endocytic function is at least partly independent of HIF function, as
Hif-α knockdown could not rescue the cell motility phenotypes in multiple cell systems. However, pVHL has recently been shown to regulate endocytosis of EGF receptor via HIF-dependent suppression of a Rab5 effector, rabaptin-5, in ccRCC cell lines (
Wang et al., 2009). It is not known whether these different mechanisms are specific for different surface receptors.
In a separate study (
Mortimer and Moberg, 2009), the tracheal branching phenotype in
dVHL knockdown flies (mediated by trachea-specific expression of
dVHL shRNA) was shown to be partly the result of over-expression of
sima, the
Drosophila homolog of
HIF-1α. sima in turn stimulates the transcription of
btl (
FGFR), leading to ectopic branching.
sima-dependent
btl transcription has also been demonstrated in terminal branching in the larval trachea, which is induced by localized hypoxia (
Centanin et al., 2008). Thus, both canonical and non-canonical functions of
dVHL are involved in the tubule formation in
Drosophila.
The role of
dVHL in regulating motile epithelial cells was further studied in
Drosophila border cells (
Doronkin et al., 2010), which have been considered an
in vivo model for epithelial cell invasion and epithelial–to–mesenchymal transition (
Duchek et al., 2001;
McDonald et al., 2003). During oogenesis, a specialized group of follicular epithelial cells (border cells) delaminates from the epithelium and invades through the germ cell complex until they reach the anterior end of the oocyte (
Rorth, 2002;
Montell, 2003). The precise movement of the border cells is guided by the
Drosophila platelet-derived growth factor/VEGF signaling pathway. Interestingly,
Doronkin et al. (2010) showed that the
dVHL-sima system is involved in border cell migration. However, the exact correlation between border cell migration and
dVHL function appears to be complicated, because the extents of hypoxia and the expression levels of
sima or
dVHL could cause either slowed or accelerated migration. Nonetheless, this study presented the first
in vivo demonstration of the role of pVHL in regulating epithelial cell invasion.
Because
VHL mutant ccRCC involves pathological transformation of epithelial tissues, whether and how
VHL regulates epithelial morphogenesis has been of great interest. One useful epithelial model is again the
Drosophila follicular epithelium in the egg chamber (
Duchi et al., 2010). Epithelial cells are characterized by asymmetrical specification of membrane domains. One crucial step in establishing epithelial polarity is the specification of the apical domain, which is defined by the localized accumulation of a complex containing atypical PKC (aPKC), Bazooka (Baz; mammalian and worm PAR-3) and PAR-6 (
Suzuki and Ohno, 2006). The PAR complex is required for subsequent localization of the basolateral complex that consists of known tumor suppressors Discs Large, Lethal Giant Larvae and Scribble (
Bilder et al., 2003;
Betschinger et al., 2005), and the adherens junction (
Yamanaka et al., 2003). In mutant
dVHL clones of follicle cells, microtubule bundles are disrupted and aPKC is mislocalized, leading to adenoma-like piling up of the epithelium (
Duchi et al., 2010). Consistent with the known human VHL activity (
Hergovich et al., 2003), wild-type dVHL can bind to microtubules. The direct influence of microtubule stability by dVHL leading to aPKC localization is supported by the
ex vivo culture of
dVHL mutant egg chambers, in which the aPKC mislocalization and epithelial phenotypes could be rescued by treatment with microtubule stabilizing agent paclitaxel, whereas treatment of wild-type egg chambers with microtubule destabilizing agent nocodazole could recapitulate the
dVHL mutant phenotypes (
Duchi et al., 2010). Furthermore, although wild-type
dVHL could rescue the phenotypes, the type 2A mutant Y98H (Y51H in
Drosophila), which has been shown to lose the microtubule-stabilizing function but retain partly the HIF-degradation function (
Hergovich et al., 2003), could not. Therefore, the initial apical localization of aPKC requires intact microtubule bundles, which is maintained by dVHL protein (). The
Drosophila study is the first demonstration of physiological and developmental significance of the microtubule-stabilizing function of VHL
in vivo.
Taken together, the Drosophila system has confirmed the HIF regulatory pathway, but unbiased genetic studies also revealed novel and important HIF-independent functions in endocytosis and microtubule-stabilizing functions in morphogenesis of both epithelial tubule system and polarized epithelial tissue. Also important, the Drosophila system demonstrated clearly tissue-specific functions of VHL; that is, the endocytic function of dVHL is required in tubule epithelial cells whereas the microtubule-stabilizing activity is functional in organcovering epithelium.