|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Athletes, body builders, and military personnel use dietary creatine as an ergogenic aid to boost physical performance in sports involving short bursts of high-intensity muscle activity. Lesser known is the essential role creatine, a natural regulator of energy homeostasis, plays in brain function and development. Creatine supplementation has shown promise as a safe, effective, and tolerable adjunct to medication for the treatment of brain-related disorders linked with dysfunctional energy metabolism, such as Huntington’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease. Impairments in creatine metabolism have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders, leaving clinicians, researchers and patients alike wondering if dietary creatine has therapeutic value for treating mental illness. The present review summarizes the neurobiology of the creatine-phosphocreatine circuit and its relation to psychological stress, schizophrenia, mood and anxiety disorders. While present knowledge of the role of creatine in cognitive and emotional processing is in its infancy, further research on this endogenous metabolite has the potential to advance our understanding of the biological bases of psychopathology and improve current therapeutic strategies.
The prevalence and severity of psychiatric disorders are well substantiated by epidemiologic data, where an estimated 26–30% of the U.S. population is affected by at least one mental illness annually (Kessler et al., 1994; Kessler et al., 2005). Compounding this issue, psychotropic medications have had limited treatment success owing to delayed onset of therapeutic activity, partial or no response, individual variability, poor tolerability, high cost, and stigma associated with use (Masand, 2003; Usala et al., 2008; Young et al., 2009). An array of possible side effects contribute to low adherence rates (28–44% discontinue use within 3 months), particularly impairments in memory, attention and executive processes, extrapyramidal effects, sexual dysfunction, weight gain, and sleep disturbances (Kennedy, 2006; Masand, 2003). With these concerns in mind, researchers, clinicians and patients alike are increasingly seeking out complementary and alternative medicines (CAM), or natural forms of therapy, to improve the speed and efficacy of relief, to reduce the occurrence of adverse events, and possibly to uncover innovative mechanisms of drug action. According to the 2007 National Health Interview Survey (Nahin et al., 2009), 38.3% of Americans reported using CAM annually and consumers spent more than $15 billion on non-vitamin/non-mineral products, which contain nutritional ingredients intended to supplement the diet.
Creatine monohydrate is one of the most popular of these naturally occurring compounds, with an estimated annual market value of $400 million (Metzl et al., 2001). The primary physiological function of creatine is to buffer energy concentrations in tissues with significant and fluctuating energy demands, especially in muscles and the brain (Wyss and Schultze, 2002). Interest in creatine has centered primarily on its use as an ergogenic aid to enhance sports performance (Benzi, 2000). Nevertheless, it is becoming increasingly evident that endogenous creatine plays a critical role in a range of cognitive functions, including learning, memory, attention, speech and language, and possibly emotion.
Impaired brain energy metabolism and alterations in neuronal plasticity are among the leading hypotheses in the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders (Kondo et al., 2011a; Martin et al., 2009; Stork and Renshaw, 2005; Wood et al., 2009; Yildiz-Yesiloglu and Ankerst, 2006; Young et al., 2009). Logic would suggest that interventions like creatine that modulate energetic, oxidative and neurotrophic parameters would improve therapeutic efficacy in psychiatric patients. With this end in mind, it is important to know whether psychiatric disorders show reliable alterations in creatine metabolism, and if so, what the location and directionality of these changes are with respect to each disorder. Much of the recent evidence on changes in brain creatine metabolism in humans has been provided by studies using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), a neuroimaging tool that enables scientists to noninvasively measure major metabolites like creatine and phosphocreatine in various brain regions in vivo (for review, see Kondo et al., 2011a; Maddock and Buonocore, 2012).
Understanding the relationships between the creatine-phosphocreatine circuit, stress, and psychiatric disorders may inspire novel hypotheses for the biological bases of these disorders or provide insight for mechanisms of drug action for more rapid, effective treatment. Accordingly, the purpose of this article is to review studies linking endogenous creatine with psychopathology, to weigh available evidence for the use of dietary creatine to treat psychiatric symptoms, and to discuss plausible mechanisms of action relevant to these disorders. Specifically, this paper will (1) provide a comprehensive description of the neurobiology of creatine, (2) summarize reports on the bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of creatine supplementation in humans and animals, and (3) compare and contrast changes in creatine metabolism observed in schizophrenia, mood and anxiety disorders. The discussion will focus on whether there is value in dietary creatine for treating psychiatric disorders and clinical implications will be addressed, including sex differences in creatine metabolism and response to supplementation and the effects of psychotropic medications on creatine metabolism.
Creatine is a constituent of a normal diet of protein-based foods, such as milk, meat, and nuts. It is not considered an essential nutrient because the kidneys, liver, pancreas, and possibly brain cells are able to synthesize this compound endogenously from the amino acids arginine, glycine, and methionine (Andres et al., 2008; Béard and Braissant 2010; Wyss and Kaddurah-Daouk, 2000). It is estimated that approximately half of an individual’s daily requirement comes from alimentary creatine, while the remainder is replenished by the body (Brosnan and Brosnan, 2007).
The synthesis of creatine is a simple, albeit metabolically demanding, two-step process that follows an inter-organ pathway (Figure 1). Production of creatine begins in the kidney with L-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT), an enzyme which catalyzes the conversion of arginine and glycine to form guanidinoacetate and ornithine. Evidence indicates that guanidinoacetate is then released from the kidney and taken up by the liver. In the liver, the second enzyme in this process, glycine N-methyltransferase (GAMT), recruits S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) to methylate guanidinoacetate to form creatine and S-adenylhomocysteine (SAH). Creatine synthesis is estimated to consume between 40% to 70% of available methyl groups provided by SAMe, a considerable demand upon amino acid metabolism (Brosnan et al., 2007; Mudd and Poole, 1975; Stead et al., 2001; Wyss and Kaddurah-Daouk, 2000; Wyss and Walliman, 1994).
Endogenous synthesis of creatine possibly occurs in the brain as AGAT and GAMT are expressed in most cell types, particularly neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes (Braissant et al., 2005). However, contrary findings raise uncertainty about whether central synthesis of creatine is possible, and if it is, whether it contributes significantly to total brain creatine content (Mak et al., 2009). For instance, it was found that only ~12% of cortical cells co-expressed AGAT and GAMT, while more than 30% of cells did not express either enzyme in rat brain (Braissant and Henry, 2008). In addition, individuals born with a mutation in the SLC6A8 creatine transporter gene, which inhibits the uptake of creatine into brain cells, display significantly reduced creatine levels and severe metabolic and cognitive impairments despite normal functioning of AGAT and GAMT. One explanation is that brain synthesis of creatine follows an inter-cell pathway. It may be that AGAT-containing cells synthesize and release guanidinoacetate, which then would be taken up by GAMT-containing cells to be converted to creatine, but more research is required to clarify this hypothesis. It is generally agreed that the majority of creatine synthesis occurs peripherally in the kidney (via AGAT), liver and pancreas (via GAMT).
Following biosynthesis or ingestion, creatine is transferred from blood plasma by specific sodium and chloride-dependent creatine transporters (CRT) located in skeletal muscle, kidney, heart, brain and liver (Snow and Murphy, 2001). Importantly, creatine enters the brain via these specialized CRTs at the blood-brain barrier, which underscores the potential benefits of oral creatine supplementation to treat brain-related disorders (Nash et al., 1994; Ohtsuki et al., 2002). Daily supplementation with creatine monohydrate reliably produces measurable increases of creatine and phosphocreatine in the brain in humans and animals after several weeks (Dechent et al., 1999; Ferrante et al., 2000; Ipsiroglu et al., 2001; Lyoo et al., 2003; Persky et al., 2003a, b; Stöckler et al., 1996). However, entry of creatine into the brain does not occur as rapidly as uptake into muscle tissue because astrocytic feet, which lack CRTs, limit the surface area of microcapillaries and partially obstruct central nervous system (CNS) access (Andres et al., 2008; Ohtsuki et al., 2002).
Once creatine passes the blood brain barrier, it is taken up from extracellular fluid by neurons and oligodendrocytes by CRTs, where it serves its primary role as an energy shuttle and regulator of energy homeostasis. Recent work mapping the regional and cellular locations of CRTs found the highest level of expression in neurons within the olfactory bulb, hippocampus (granulate cells of dentate gyrus), cerebral cortex (pyramidal neurons), cerebellum (Purkinje cells), brain stem (motor and sensory cranial nerves), and the spinal cord (dorsal and ventral horns), whereas the lowest levels of CRT expression was found in the basal ganglia and white matter (Mak et al., 2009). It is important to note that many of the brain regions that express CRTs are compromised in conditions like Alzheimer’s Disease (Bürklen et al., 2006), Huntington’s Disease (Ryu et al., 2005), and psychiatric disorders (Andres et al., 2008), to name a few. Loss of CRT-containing tissue may further contribute to cognitive or emotional deficits observed in numerous brain-related disorders.
Constant replenishment of creatine from either the diet or biosynthesis is necessary. Once inside a cell, creatine is phosphorylated for energy storage, a process to be described in more detail below. This reversible conversion results in a spontaneous non-enzymatic byproduct called creatinine, which is excreted from the body by the kidneys. High energy demands required by numerous cellular processes also deplete stores of phosphorylated creatine. The rate of depletion of creatine resources is estimated at approximately 1.7% of the total pool per day (Benzi, 2000; Walliman et al., 1992). Since the majority of creatine is found in skeletal muscle, the rate of reduction varies across gender and age (Brosnan and Brosnan, 2007).
Creatine is most commonly recognized as an ergogenic aid used by athletes, body builders, and military personnel to enhance muscle mass and physical performance during brief intervals of extremely intense activities, which rapidly deplete muscle energy stores, such as bench press lifting, sprinting, or swimming (Benzi, 2000). As an example, imagine the burst of energy required by a sprinter taking off from a starting block at the beginning of a track meet. The runner’s muscles launch the body forward by hydrolyzing significant amounts of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) molecules, the energy currency within cells. The actual concentrations of ATP within muscle cells normally do not fluctuate markedly because pools of stored creatine (phosphocreatine) immediately and constantly replenish energy as it is being used. Of significance, this reaction also occurs continually within brain cells to buffer ATP for many types of energy-requiring brain functions, especially Na+ transport, Ca2+ transport, the processing of neurotransmitters (e.g., synthesis, uptake, release), intracellular signaling, and axonal and dendritic transport (for review, see Ames, 2000).
The majority of ATP synthesis occurs during aerobic cellular respiration, beginning with glycolysis (i.e., catabolism of carbohydrates) and ending with the coupling of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) + phosphate group via oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 1). However, these complex, multi-step metabolic pathways require time and energy. Bearing this in mind, the creatine-creatine kinase-phosphocreatine circuit may be thought of as a bioenergetic thermostat that quickly replenishes ATP in tissue to maintain stable levels when there are sudden and significant energy demands (Wyss and Schulze, 2002). Creatine kinase isoenzymes catalyze the phosphorylation of creatine to form pools of phosphocreatine, which serve as stored energy reserves (Figure 1). When energy is needed, creatine kinase catalyzes the transfer of the phosphate group from phosphocreatine to ADP to form ATP. Thus, phosphocreatine is the rate-limiting step in the rapid resynthesis of ATP when energy demand increases. Mitochondrial dysfunction may arise when phosphocreatine is repeatedly depleted because it is no longer available to replenish ATP. Instead, the cell must shift back to the less efficient glycolysis pathway to meet energy needs, which may set the stage for a cascade of events that lead to brain-related pathology (Stork and Renshaw, 2005).
So-called “hot spots” of creatine kinase expression in the brain are found in the granule layer of the cerebellum, granule and pyramidal cells of the hippocampus, and epithelial cells of the choroid plexus (Kaldis et al., 1996). The majority of tissues express a combination of two types of creatine kinase within a single cell out of a total of four that exist: muscle-type, sarcomeric mitochondrial-type, brain-type, and ubiquitous mitochondrial-type (Kaldis et al., 1996, Walliman et al., 1992). In the brain, the ubiquitious mitochondrial-type, which dephosphorylates mitochondrial generated ATP, is typically expressed together with the brain-type, located in the cytosol and dephosphorylates glycolytically generated ATP, to produce large pools of phosphocreatine (Andres et al., 2008). The phosphorylation of creatine (phosphocreatine), by way of the dephosphorylation of ATP, is a reversible reaction so that the creatine kinases can replenish ATP when cellular energy needs increase.
The creatine-phosphocreatine system is described as a spatial energy buffer because it acts as an energy transport system that carries high-energy phosphates from mitochondrial production sites to energy utilization sites. In addition, it is a temporal energy buffer because it maintains energy homeostasis by buffering ADP and ATP ratios (Brosnan and Brosnan, 2007). The following example summarizes the buffering activities of the creatine circuit in neuronal tissue. After ATP is produced by ATP synthase on the mitochondrial inner membrane, it is released to the intermembrane space in exchange for ADP through the adenine nucleotide transporter (reviewed in Andres et al., 2008; Brosnan et al., 2007). If energy is not needed, the ubiquitous mitochondrial-type creatine kinase, found within the intermembrane space of the mitochondria, transfers the phosphoryl group from ATP to creatine, which then leaves the mitochondria to join the pool of phosphocreatine in the cytosol. When energy demand increases, such as during signal transduction, brain-type creatine kinase transfers a phosphoryl group from phosphocreatine to ADP to replenish ATP concentrations to avoid energy imbalance.
While the physiologic importance of creatine has been studied extensively, much less is understood about the pharmacokinetics of dietary creatine. The absolute bioavailability of supraphysiological doses of creatine is unknown. McCall and Persky (2007) outline four reasons why bioavailability may be less than 100%. First, creatine can be degraded in an acidic environment like the stomach. However, creatine spends little time in the stomach so it is assumed little creatine is lost this way. Second, creatine and its metabolite, creatinine, may be degraded by intestinal bacteria and lost in feces. Third, creatine absorption is a time-consuming process, and it is possible that excess creatine is pushed by intestinal flow beyond areas of the intestinal tract where creatine can be transported across the intestinal wall by CRTs. Fourth, decreased bioavailability may occur because creatine will not be absorbed unless if it is fully dissolved.
It is hypothesized that lower doses of creatine, defined as less than 5 g in humans, will have larger bioavailability than higher doses, defined as more than 10 g in humans, because saturation of target sites with creatine may result in the downregulation of CRT function or number (McCall and Persky, 2007; Persky, 2003; Perskey et al., 2003a, b). In addition, larger doses slow the absorption of creatine, which otherwise occurs very rapidly, usually less than 2 hours (McCall and Persky, 2007). Furthermore, tissues with lower presupplementation concentrations of creatine will show greater accumulation of creatine after supplementation (Ipsiroglu et al., 2001). In humans and in animals, research has consistently shown that administration of creatine over a prolonged period of time results in measurable increases of creatine concentrations in brain and muscle tissue, which is most pronounced after 4 weeks (Dechent et al., 1999; Ferrante et al., 2000; Ipsiroglu et al., 2001; Persky et al., 2003a, b; Stöckler et al., 1996). For instance, in humans, Dechent et al. (1999) reported significant increases in total brain creatine, particularly in the thalamus, cerebellum, white matter, and gray matter, in healthy young adults following administration of creatine monohydrate (4 × 5 g per day) for four weeks. Persky et al. (2003b) showed that repeated dosing with creatine (e.g., 5 g creatine four times/day over six days) resulted in less clearance than volunteers given a single 5 g dose of creatine, likely owing to saturation of creatine pools in muscle tissue. In animals, Ipsiroglu et al. (2001) found that 4 weeks of oral creatine supplementation produced the most pronounced increases in creatine concentrations in the muscle, brain, kidney and lungs of guinea pigs, mice and rats (and there were no systematic differences in organ distribution of creatine across species). In contrast, single or repeated administration of creatine (160 mg/kg, i.p.) to rats within a period of one to two days produced negligible increases in brain creatine (1% from baseline), underscoring the necessity of daily supplementation in the diet over several days to achieve optimal blood-brain barrier penetration and significant accumulation in the brain (Perasso et al., 2003). In summary, creatine supplementation increases brain concentrations of creatine and phosphocreatine in humans given approximately 0.13 to 0.80 g/kg/day for 14 days (Bianchi et al., 2000, Dechent et al., 1999, Lyoo et al., 2003) and animals fed 2.2 to 2.6 g/kg/day for 10 days (Allen et al., unpublished results; Michaelis et al., 1999, Wick et al., 1999).
In patient populations, the schedule of creatine administration varies from clinical study to clinical study because guidelines have not been definitively established. However, to increase brain creatine levels in human populations, it has been recommended that investigators implement a loading phase (ranging from 15 to 20 g/d creatine for approximately 3–7 days) to ensure tissue saturation, followed by a maintenance phase of ~5–10 grams for at least 2–3 months (McCall and Persky, 2007). Nevertheless, few studies have evaluated where or how much brain creatine concentrations increase on the basis of dose or schedule of administration, though estimates are around 10% (Lyoo et al., 2003; McCall and Persky, 2007).
In addition to the dosage amount, another important point when considering creatine as a therapeutic intervention is the method in which it is administered. While creatine is rapidly absorbed, different dosage forms (e.g. solutions, powders, capsules) can influence the bioavailability of creatine. Harris et al. (2002) reported that 2 g of creatine resulted in different peak concentration-time profiles depending on the form it was administered, whereby the solution form of creatine reached maximal concentration before the suspension and lozenge forms, and all of these forms peaked before meat (e.g., solution > suspension = lozenge > meat). Therefore, solid forms like meat increase plasma creatine but require thorough digestion and dissolution, which reduces the rate at which this source of creatine is absorbed and made available to the body.
Extensive monographs that describe side effects associated with creatine supplementation are available, such as Natural Standard (2012) and Health Canada (2011). Creatine supplementation is generally considered safe and well-tolerated by humans and animals (Rodriguez et al., 2009). For instance, no significant adverse effects have been reported in studies of patients with inborn error of creatine synthesis given up to 0.8 g/kg daily for two years (reviewed in Braissant and Henry, 2008). Likewise, no major health issues were reported in a study of 9 healthy athletes administered 1–20 g/day from 1–4 times/day for up to five years (Poortsman and Francaux, 1999). Nonetheless, empirical and anecdotal accounts do exist that describe mild to moderate side effects of daily creatine supplementation. The majority of these reported side effects are of weight gain, gastrointestinal distress, altered insulin production, inhibition of endogenous creatine synthesis, renal dysfunction, or dehydration in study participants. Fewer have reported disturbances in mood and anxiety. Experts generally agree that there is sufficient evidence to be confident that 5 g/day of creatine is generally harmless to healthy adults, but there is not enough evidence to make an informed recommendation in favor or against doses higher than 5 g/day (Shao et al., 2006).
Sufficient evidence has been documented and reviewed to support gastrointestinal distress as a consequence of daily creatine supplementation. Mild to moderate gastrointestinal issues have been reported in a number of experimental and clinical trials, including diarrhea, nausea, and/or vomiting (Astorino et al., 2005; Chrusch et al., 2001; Cox et al., 2002; Groeneveld et al., 2003; Juhn et al., 1999; Tarnopolsky, 2000). In addition, abdominal discomfort, increased or decreased appetite, weight gain, stomach distress, and loose stool have been reported (Juhn et al., 1999; Kendall et al., 2005; Tarnopolsky, 2000; Volek et al., 2000).
While some case studies have suggested that creatine causes renal dysfunction, most empirical studies in humans and animals indicate that it is more probable that creatine worsens pre-existing renal disease (Kuehl et al., 1998; Koshy et al., 1999; Edmunds et al., 2001; Pritchard and Kalra, 1998; Sheth et al., 2006; Thornsteindottir et al., 2006). In other words, it is unlikely that healthy adults without a history of renal disease will develop kidney problems as a consequence of creatine supplementation unless there are other exacerbating factors involved, such as use of illicit anabolic-androgenic steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, nephrotoxic or renally-cleared medications, or diuretics (Natural Standard, 2012). It has also been argued that creatine supplementation can confound renal analyses because serum creatinine is the most widely used marker of renal function (Gualano et al., 2008). Creatine supplementation increases levels of creatinine, which can be falsely interpreted as an indication of renal dysfunction because most laboratories factor in serum creatinine levels when estimating glomerular filtration rate. The frequency with which physicians who are not kidney specialists misdiagnose patients that use creatine and protein supplements with renal disease is high enough that the British Medical Journal published a “Lesson of the Week” to highlight this issue (Willis et al., 2010). While research is ongoing, the majority of studies conclude that creatine supplementation is generally not harmful to the kidneys when used as directed (Dalbo et al., 2008).
The media often perpetuates anecdotal reports of creatine-induced dehydration, however few empirical studies using control groups and blinding have documented dehydration as a side effect of creatine supplementation (Juhn et al., 1999, Poortsman and Francaux, 1999). To err on the side of caution, physicians typically advise drinking extra water and avoiding caffeine when taking creatine supplements (Vahedi et al., 2000).
Increased body weight has been reported in humans following creatine supplementation. This is most probably due to the fact that creatine is an osmotically active substance that increases water retention inside cells (for review, see Bemben and Lamont, 2005; Sobolewski et al., 2011). This water weight is lost following discontinuation of creatine supplements.
Negative changes in mood or anxiety following supplementation with creatine have been documented in two human trials (Roitman et al., 2007; Volek et al., 2000) and one animal experiment (Allen et al., 2010). Specifically, in an open-label clinical trial of creatine, Roitman et al. (2007) reported that two patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder exhibited hypomania or mania following daily supplementation with 3–5 g creatine. In a clinical trial examining the effectiveness of creatine to enhance heavy resistance training, Volek et al. (2000) noted that two subjects reported feeling more aggressive and nervous after 1 week of creatine supplementation (25 g/day). In rodents, Allen et al. (2010) observed increased depression-like behavior in male rats supplemented with 4% creatine for five weeks, although this effect was not replicated in male rats in a follow-up study (Allen et al., in press). Taken together, there remains the possibility that creatine can increase risk of mania or depression in susceptible individuals. It is also possible that long-term high dosing of creatine alters creatine transporter function or creatine kinase activity in a manner that adversely affects emotional regulation. Further research is required before definitive conclusions are drawn, but caution is warranted in at-risk individuals.
The majority of research on creatine has focused on the ability of creatine monohydrate to improve muscle strength and physical endurance in healthy adult athletes. Systematic reviews of studies assessing the ergogenic effects of creatine have found consistent beneficial effects in sporting activities that involve repeated, short bouts of intense exercise, including football and soccer (for review, see Bemben and Lamont, 2005). The favorable effects of creatine supplementation on muscle energy metabolism and function increase the plausibility of creatine having a positive effect on brain energy metabolism, cognitive processes and/or mood states. This is particularly interesting because metabolic dysfunction is hypothesized to be a contributing factor for thought and mood disturbances. Accordingly, evidence for the association of creatine with cognition and mood in healthy and creatine deficient populations are considered in this section to facilitate understanding of how creatine metabolism differs in psychiatric populations.
Virtually no human or animal studies have directly examined the association of brain creatine metabolism to mood or cognition in healthy adults. However, converging evidence is bringing to light the importance of endogenous creatine for normal brain development and cognitive function. The expression of the majority of creatine kinase iosenzymes in the hippocampus and frontal cortex provides one clue that creatine metabolism participates in higher mental functioning (Kaldis et al., 1996). Another clue is the unanticipated finding that, in healthy volunteers, low phosphocreatine levels were associated with better performance on a specific frontal lobe task (Wisconsin Card Sorting Task)(Volz et al., 1998b). This evidence suggests that individuals that more efficiently replenish ATP, which relies upon the creatine-phosphocreatine circuit, have a cognitive advantage in tasks that heavily tax the frontal cortex (Volz et al., 1998b).
On the other hand, there has been significant research interest in the potential for creatine supplementation to enhance cognitive performance and brain function in healthy adults. In human intervention studies, most placebo-controlled, double-blind studies reported positive findings. In healthy volunteers, creatine supplementation reduced mental fatigue following a stressful time-pressured serial calculation test (Watanabe et al., 2002). Additionally, creatine improved working memory and intelligence scores in vegetarians and vegans, who are more likely to have diminished phosphocreatine reserves due to limited meat consumption (Rae et al., 2003). In non-vegetarians undergoing significant sleep deprivation paired with mild exercise (> 24 hours), creatine improved mood and reduced fatigue and performance decline on a choice reaction task (McMorris et al., 2006). In a follow-up study, creatine supplementation enhanced performance on central executive and working memory tasks after 36-hours of sleep deprivation (McMorris et al., 2007a). In older adults (~76 years of age), creatine buffered age-related cognitive decline, with improvement in verbal and spatial short-term memory and long-term memory after one week of daily supplementation (McMorris et al., 2007b). Most recently, adults supplemented with creatine exhibited better short-term memory and trended towards better abstract reasoning than placebo controls (Hammett et al., 2010). Post-supplementation fMRI Blood oxygen dependent responses were reduced compared to baseline, which indicates reduced metabolic demand, changes in vascular response, increased oxygen uptake, or direct neuromodulatory effects (e.g., modulating glutamatergic or GABAergic receptors).
The positive effects of creatine on cognitive behavior may be mediated in situations of stress, which significantly reduce available phosphocreatine reserves. For instance, creatine did not improve the performance of rested non-vegetarians on a battery of neurocognitive tests (Rawson et al., 2008). As mentioned, studies of vegetarian and vegan subjects may have shown greater benefit in cognitive processing post-supplementation because they presumably have lower brain creatine levels due to dietary restrictions (e.g., Rae et al., 2003). Indeed, tissues with lower pre-supplementation concentrations of creatine will show greater accumulation of creatine after supplementation (Ipsiroglu et al., 2001; Pan and Takahashi, 2006). Moreover, many other studies that have shown creatine-induced differences in cognitive function involved conditions that reduced brain creatine, such as significant sleep deprivation, mild exercise, and stressful mathematical tasks (McMorris et al., 2006; Watanabe et al., 2002).
In rodent models of cognition, female mice supplemented with 1% creatine performed better on the object recognition test, lived 9% longer, exhibited fewer markers of ageing (lipofuscin) and less oxidative stress in the hippocampus than unsupplemented mice, suggesting improved memory capabilities in these mice (Bender et al., 2008). In male rats, it was observed that intra-hippocampal administration of creatine (2.5 and 7.5 nmol) improved spatial learning, specifically by reducing escape time and the mean number of errors on subsequent trials of the Barnes Maze test (Oliveira et al., 2008). Interestingly, these researchers found that blocking the polyamine-binding site at the NMDA receptor by co-administration of arcaine (0.02 nmol/hippocampus) prevented this creatine-induced spatial learning enhancement, while co-administration of the polyamine binding site agonist spermidine (0.02 nmol/hippocampus) intensified this effect. Complementing these findings, creatine applied to hippocampal brain slices in vitro enhanced synaptic plasticity, but this effect was not observed in the presence of AP5, an NMDA antagonist (Royes et al., 2008). Taken together, creatine may exert positive cognitive effects by modifying the activity of the NMDA receptor (Brosnan and Brosnan, 2007).
Severe cognitive deficits are observed in patients diagnosed with an inborn error of creatine synthesis or an X-linked creatine transporter defect (reviewed in Braissant and Henry, 2008). Briefly, defects in the AGAT or GAMT biosynthesis genes render the body unable to synthesize creatine endogenously, whereas the presence of a mutation in the SLC6A8 gene causes creatine transporter dysfunction that prevents the uptake of creatine into muscle and brain cells. Individuals with these types of inborn errors exhibit significant brain atrophy, mitochondrial abnormalities, severe developmental delays, speech and language impairments, autism, and epilepsy (Andres et al., 2008; Braissant and Henry, 2008; Schulze et al., 2003).
Cognitive and behavioral improvement is observed in creatine deficiency patients with AGAT and GAMT deficiencies after long-term daily oral treatment with high doses of creatine monohydrate (with 0.30 – 0.80 g/kg ), however supplementation is ineffective in treating SLC6A8 transporter defects (Battini et al., 2002, Bianchi et al., 2007; Bizzi et al., 2002; Mercimek-Mahmutoglu et al., 2006; Stöckler et al., 1996; Salomons et al., 2001). In addition, creatine supplementation was safe and effective in treating a 4-month-old infant diagnosed with AGAT deficiency (Battini et al., 2006). Early intervention with creatine monohydrate may reduce or prevent deficits that occur early in life. This is important because de novo synthesis and uptake of creatine is critical to normal brain development in humans. Expression of creatine kinases have been found in the hindbrain, midbrain, and fore brain of fetuses at 8-weeks after conception (Andres et al., 2008; Braissant et al., 2005).
In animal models of creatine deficiency, transgenic mice lacking mitochondrial- and brain-type creatine kinases exhibit smaller hippocampi, larger pyramidal mossy-fiber fields, decreased creatine content, and undetectable levels of phosphocreatine relative to values observed in wild-type animals (in ‘t Zandt et al., 2004; Streijger et al., 2005). Behaviorally, these animals show severe impairments in spatial learning, less nest-building activity, less pre-pulse inhibition, and poor acoustic and startle reflex compared to wild-type controls (Jost et al., 2002; Streijger et al., 2004; Streijger et al., 2005). Mice deficient of only one creatine kinase isoenzyme (single knock-out) exhibit less severe physical and behavioral phenotypes, with intact sensory and motor systems, most likely because the intact isoenzyme compensates for the absence of the other (Streijger et al., 2005).
Psychiatric illness is characterized by diverse neural abnormalities, running the gamut from neuroendocrine and neurotransmission systems to neuroanatomical and neurotrophic factors, and these processes have significant energy requirements. Psychological stress is associated with impairments in energy metabolism, which increase the susceptibility of neurons to the negative effects of reactive oxygen species (oxidative stress), including lipid peroxidation, protein carboxylation, DNA damage and apoptosis (Seifried et al., 2007). In view of this evidence, chronic psychological stress is considered a precipitating factor in the onset of psychiatric disorders (Caspi et al., 2003; Duman and Monteggia, 2006; Pittenger and Duman; 2008, Sapolsky, 2000). For instance, in mice, chronic mild stress damaged mitochondrial structure and function in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex and increased depression-like behavior (Gong et al., 2011). Given that creatine metabolism depends on mitochondrial function, it is hypothesized that stress causes changes in creatine, phosphocreatine, or creatine kinase in brain areas linked with mental illness. If this is the case, stress-related psychiatric disorders may benefit from creatine supplementation or other agents that stimulate creatine kinase to reverse the deleterious effects of stress on mitochondrial dysfunction. Moreover, creatine supplementation may be beneficial in safeguarding the brain because it prevents oxidative damage from the formation of reactive oxygen species through direct antioxidant activity (Sestili et al., 2006; Young et al., 2010).
The effects of psychological stress on brain creatine metabolism have not been directly studied in humans, but stress-induced impairments in brain metabolite concentrations have been investigated in animal models of stress. Using MRS neuroimaging and histological techniques, researchers have found that subordinate animals exposed repeatedly to experiences of psychosocial defeat by dominant animals exhibit significantly less total creatine (the sum of creatine + phosphocreatine), reduced hippocampal volume, and impaired neurogenesis (Czéh et al., 2001; Fuchs et al., 2002; van der Hart et al., 2003). Moreover, these studies showed that the effects of stress on total creatine concentrations and neuroplasticity were reversed after treatment with tianeptine (Stablon) and clomipramine (Anafranil), and a novel substance P antagonist (L-760,735). Another study using MRS imaging ex vivo found that rats subjected to single prolonged stress showed reduced creatine concentrations in the medial prefrontal cortex compared to non-stress controls (Knox et al., 2010). On the basis of these findings, it is difficult to know whether the effects of stress on creatine occur upstream or downstream of mitochondria, but the creatine-phosphocreatine circuit may be an important mediator or target of drug action.
One known study in animals has directly assessed the effects of creatine supplementation on stress-induced impairments. Young chickens that had creatine (2 μg) administered directly into their brains prior to social separation displayed significantly fewer stress responses, including fewer vocalizations, less spontaneous activity, and reduced plasma corticosterone concentrations (Koga et al., 2005). These effects were blocked by concomitant administration of picrotoxin, a GABAA antagonist, suggesting that creatine exerts protective effects against stress, at least in part, by modifying GABAA receptor activity.
Schizophrenia is a behaviorally and biochemically heterogeneous disorder characterized by psychotic episodes, which are periods of time in which the individual experiences significant disturbances in thought and/or loses contact with reality. Symptoms manifestations include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thought or speech, catatonic behavior, and/or negative symptoms (e.g., flattened affect, alogia, or avolition). The lifetime prevalence of schizophrenia is approximately 0.5–1% of the population (Bhugra, 2005; McGrath et al., 2008).
Impairments in metabolic function, neuronal density and cellular integrity in the frontal and temporal lobes, basal ganglia, and hippocampus have been observed in schizophrenic patients (Bertolino et al., 1998; Fukuzako et al., 1995; Fujimoto et al., 1996; Yurgelun-Todd et al., 1996). Decreased metabolic activity diminishes the brain’s ability to efficiently generate or process neural signals, which may account for the positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia described above. Consistent with this evidence of impaired metabolic processes, abnormalities in the creatine-phosphocreatine pathways have also been observed within emotional and executive brain regions of schizophrenic patients. Additionally, some studies have found an association between creatine metabolism and cognitive function in schizophrenia, generating much interest in the role creatine plays in the pathogenesis of the disorder.
One of the earliest and most robust findings in clinical reports of schizophrenia is the incidence of psychosis-associated creatine kinase-emia (PACK), which refers to a marked spike in serum creatine kinase levels at the onset of acute psychotic episodes (Coffey et al., 1970; Faulstich et al., 1984; Gosling et al., 1972; Hermesh et al., 2002; Meltzer 1968, 1973, 1976; Meltzer et al., 1969, 1970; Martin et al., 1972; Schweid et al., 1972). Studies have reported that approximately half of acutely psychotic schizophrenic patients exhibit muscle-type PACK, though interestingly normal creatine kinase activity is observed in patients experiencing chronic episodes of psychosis (Hermesh et al., 2002; Melkersson et al., 2006). Moreover, sex differences have been observed in PACK, with men showing significantly greater increases in muscle-type creatine kinase activity than women, and this pattern is more likely to reoccur in men than women (Hermesh et al., 2002; Manor et al., 1998).
In recent years, advancements in neuroimaging technology have better enabled scientists to research creatine metabolism in the brain of schizophrenic patients (Table 1a,e). Reports have described alterations specific to schizophrenia, but the evidence is inconsistent and sometimes contradictory. In studies that specifically measured phosphocreatine, elevated levels have been observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)(Volz et al.,1998b). Additionally, levels of phosphocreatine were also found to be asymmetrical in the temporal lobes in schizophrenia, with the left side displaying lower levels than the right, but there were no overall differences compared with controls (Deicken et al., 1995). In contrast, less phosphocreatine has been found in the frontal region of schizophrenics and first-degree relatives of schizophrenics (Deicken et al., 1994; Klemm et al., 2001; Volz et al., 2000). Other studies did not observe differences in phosphocreatine in the DLPFC (Volz et al., 1998a) or the temporal lobes (Calabrese et al., 1992; Fujimoto et al., 1992). Reduced total creatine has been reported in the DLPFC (Ohrmann et al., 2007), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)(Öngür et al., 2009; Tayoshi et al., 2009), the left thalamus (Yoo et al., 2009), parietal-occipital cortex (Öngür et al., 2009), and white matter (Auer et al., 2001). Conversely, increased total creatine concentrations have been reported in the left frontal-parietal region (Fujimoto et al., 1992), ACC (Jensen et al., 2004; O’Neill et al., 2003), hippocampus (Lutkenhoff et al., 2010), left temporal lobe (Fukuzako et al.,1999), medial temporal lobe (Wood et al., 2008), and parietal cortex (Bluml et al., 1999). Numerous other neuroimaging studies have not detected any differences in creatine metabolism in these areas when comparing schizophrenic patients to healthy controls (Table 1a,e).
Behavioral measures correlated with creatine metabolism in certain studies. For instance, total thalamic creatine and frontal phosphocreatine were associated with psychiatric symptoms, measured using the Brief Psychotic Rating Scale (Auer et al., 2000; Deicken et al., 1994). In particular, low frontal phosphocreatine was observed in schizophrenics with high hostility-suspiciousness scores and high anxiety-depression scores (Deicken et al., 1994). Moreover, schizophrenics with high negative symptom scores exhibited greater phosphocreatine levels in the frontal lobes than schizophrenics with few negative symptoms and healthy controls (Kato et al.,1995). Additionally, asymmetry of phosphocreatine/ATP in the temporal lobes was also associated with severity of psychiatric symptoms (Calabrese et al., 1992), and reduced left temporal phosphocreatine and greater phosphocreatine asymmetry were associated with more severe thinking disturbances (Deicken et al., 1995). As a whole, reduced brain phosphocreatine levels correspond with earlier findings of hyper creatine kinase activity (PACK).
One intervention study in humans has been carried out using a randomized, double-blind cross-over design to examine the potential for creatine to buffer abnormal energy metabolism in schizophrenia (Kapstan et al., 2007). Creatine supplementation was not superior to placebo in treating symptoms. The heterogeneity of schizophrenia, both in neuropsychological symptoms and treatment effects, may contribute to variability in this small study (Stroup, 2007; Sautter et al., 1995). Additionally, the severity or duration of illness or difficulties in measuring symptom improvement may generate a false negative result. On the other hand, perhaps creatine supplementation would show more benefit in first-episode, treatment-naïve patients. Moreover, as significant neurobiological evidence supports the plausibility that schizophrenia is a disorder of neurodevelopment (Weinberger, 1996), creatine may prove more essential during a critical point in cortical development. As mentioned previously, creatine plays a significant role in embryonic development, as well as in the survival and differentiation of GABA-ergic and dopaminergic neurons (Andres et al., 2005; Ducray et al., 2007a, b).
Major depressive disorders are characterized by at least one major depressive episode, or a period of at least two weeks during which an individual experiences a depressed mood or loss of pleasure in activities once enjoyed. To receive a clinical diagnosis of major depression, this episode must be accompanied by four or more additional depressive symptoms, such as difficulty concentrating, changes in sleep, appetite or weight, decreased energy, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, or suicidal ideation, plans, or attempts. Currently, an estimated 5–6% of the U.S. population suffers from major depression annually, whereas 13–16% of the population is at risk of experiencing depression over the course of a lifetime (Hasin et al., 2005; Kessler et al., 2003).
The role of dysfunctional creatine metabolism in the neurochemical underpinnings of depression was first considered over three decades ago (Agren and Niklasson, 1984, 1988). In the first of these studies, a significantly negative correlation between levels of creatinine in cerebral spinal fluid and self-reported suicidal ideation was identified in depressed patients (Agren and Niklasson, 1984). Moreover, a positive relationship between CSF dopamine and serotonin metabolites (HVA and 5-HIAA) and levels of creatine and creatinine was subsequently discovered in depressed patients (Agren and Niklasson, 1988). Altogether, these data hinted at the fact that functional neurotransmission depends on intracellular energy metabolism supported by the creatine-phosphocreatine system.
Imaging studies have found conflicting alterations in absolute concentrations of phosphocreatine or total creatine for patients diagnosed with depression (Table 1b,e). One study reported increased total creatine in the left caudate of depressed patients (Gabbay et al., 2007). Two studies found decreased total creatine in the ACC (Mirza et al., 2004) and medial PFC (Venkatraman et al., 2009), though the latter study was exclusively an elderly population. One other finding reported an intriguing sex by diagnosis interaction for total creatine in the DLPFC, where depressed men exhibited less total creatine than healthy men and depressed women exhibited more total creatine than healthy women (Nery et al., 2009). This sex-dependent outcome will be considered in the clinical implications section below.
Assessments of symptom severity in serum and neuroimaging studies support a link between brain creatine metabolism and depression. Serum creatine kinase activity (Segal et al., 2007), levels of white matter creatine (Dager et al., 2004), left DLPFC total creatine (Michael et al., 2003), and frontal lobe phosphocreatine (Kato et al., 1992) are correlated with the severity of depression. Reduced creatine metabolism is associated with a less favorable course and outcome of depressive illness.
Increasing evidence supports the use of creatine monohydrate for preventing or treating depression. Data from preclinical animal studies indicate that daily supplementation with 4% creatine for five weeks produces antidepressant-like effects in female rats tested in the forced swim test, a behavioral assay that is sensitive to pharmacological agents known to alter depressive symptoms in humans (Allen et al., 2010). Moreover, in a follow up study, Allen et al. (in press) observed that sub-acute treatment with low-dose fluoxetine (5 mg/kg, or a total of 15 mg/kg) modestly augmented the antidepressant-like behavioral effects of dietary creatine in female rats. In humans, two open-label, add-on intervention studies have reported improved mood in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression following daily supplementation with 3–5 g creatine for four weeks (Amital et al., 2006a, Roitman et al., 2007). In adolescents, another preliminary open-label, add-on study reported that 4 g of creatine administered daily for 8 weeks improved depressive symptoms and increased brain phosphocreatine concentrations in treatment-resistant females concurrently prescribed the SSRI fluoxetine (Kondo et al., 2011b). Complementing these reports are MRS imaging data showing that high baseline levels of phosphocreatine predicted treatment response in depressed adults after four weeks of daily medication with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and triiodothyronine, a thyroid hormone known to increase brain energy metabolism (Iosifescu et al., 2008). The promising results of these initial studies, in tandem with plausible neurobiological hypotheses to be discussed in later sections, have motivated four clinical trials that are currently underway to evaluate the potential for creatine supplementation to improve clinical relief in patients who have previously failed to respond to adequate trials of antidepressant drugs (NCT00729755, NCT01175616, NCT00313417, NCT00851006).
Bipolar disorder is a severe and disabling mental illness characterized by at least one manic episode, or a period of time in which the individual experiences extreme euphoria, confidence, or recklessness. Frequently individuals also experience at least one major depressive episode, which results in recurring shifts in mood states from extreme highs (mania, hypomania) to extreme lows (dysthymia, depression). Lifetime prevalence of bipolar disorder is estimated at about 4% of the U.S. population (Kessler et al., 2005).
There has been significant interest in the role of the creatine-phosphocreatine circuit in the pathogenesis of bipolar disorder, especially as evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar patients continues to grow (Kato, 2008; Young et al., 2007). Postmortem analyses have revealed significant downregulation of brain-type creatine kinase and ubiquitous mitochondrial creatine kinase mRNA levels in the DLPFC and hippocampus of bipolar patients compared with schizophrenic and healthy controls (MacDonald et al., 2006). Moreover, important insight into the relationship between mood state and creatine metabolism has been gained through the evaluation of alternating periods of depression and mania. A number of reports have described elevated serum creatine kinase activity levels during the manic state compared to the euthymic and depressive states, which may indicate that changes in creatine kinase activity correspond with mood states or cognitive speed in bipolar patients (Chung et al., 2009; Danivas et al., 2010; Feier et al., 2010; Segal et al., 2007).
Neuroimaging studies frequently observe reduced levels of PCr or total creatine in areas within the frontal lobe in bipolar patients (Table 1c,e)(Kato et al., 1994; Hamakawa et al., 1999), particularly total creatine within the PFC (Cecil et al., 2003), left medial PFC (Caetano et al., 2011), and DLPFC (Caetano et al., 2011; Frey et al., 2007a; Sassi et al., 2005). One exception is a study reporting greater total creatine concentrations in the VLPFC (Patel et al., 2008). Findings in the ACC are mixed, with reports of increased total creatine in ACC/mPFC (Frye et al., 2007), a trend towards greater total creatine in the ACC (Patel et al., 2008), and reductions in total creatine in the ACC (Öngür et al., 2010). Reduced total creatine has also been reported in the cerebellum (Cecil et al., 2003). Lastly, treatment resistant bipolar patients exhibited lower total creatine in the occipital cortex after photic stimulation compared to treatment responders and healthy controls (Murashita et al., 2000). It is important to note that, for each of these regions of interest, there also exists neuroimaging research on creatine metabolism that did not find differences between bipolar patients and healthy controls (see Table 1c,e).
There were no associations reported between cognitive or symptom assessments and creatine in bipolar disorder. Moreover, essentially no studies have directly examined creatine supplementation in bipolar patients, with the exception of Roitman et al. (2007). It was reported that creatine supplementation might have precipitated manic episodes in two bipolar subjects approximately three weeks post-creatine treatment. Although there are no double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluating creatine supplementation for the treatment of bipolar disorder, other purported metabolic enhancers are increasingly being studied in this patient population, including acetyl-L-carnitine, alpha-lipoic acid, Coenzyme Q10, N-acetyl cysteine, and uridine (for review, see Sanches et al., 2010).
Anxiety disorders are the most common class of mental illness, affecting approximately 18% of the U.S population over the course of a lifetime (Kessler et al., 2005). This category broadly refers to a constellation of chronic and distressing conditions that share the primary feature of excessive and uncontrollable anxiousness. For instance, generalized anxiety disorder, which has a lifetime prevalence of 3% in the U.S. (Kessler et al., 2005), is characterized by uncontrollable worrying nearly every day for at least six months, and causes the individual to feel restless, fatigued, distracted, or irritable.
Identifying differences in creatine metabolism may help distinguish among the different anxiety disorders or facilitate treatment (Table 1d,e). In the case of general anxiety disorder, investigators detected reduced levels of total creatine in cerebral white matter of patients (Coplan et al., 2006). This effect was only observed in patients without history of early trauma. Additionally, there was no relationship between total creatine and self-reported worry or intelligence. In a study of panic disorder, patients that were actively experiencing panic attacks exhibited reduced levels of total creatine in the right amygdalohippocampal region (Massana et al., 2002). Another study of panic disorder detected asymmetry of phosphocreatine levels in patients only, with the right frontal lobe having higher concentrations than the left (Shiori et al., 1996). In patients diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), research has shown reductions in total creatine in right and left hippocampal regions compared to control subjects (Schuff et al., 2001; Villareal et al., 2002).
Preliminary intervention studies provide support for the therapeutic value of creatine for treating PTSD, but its use in other anxiety disorders has not yet been evaluated. An initial case study reported creatine had value for treating a 52 year-old woman suffering from PTSD, depression, and fibromyalgia (Amital et al., 2006b). This patient had abnormally low muscle levels of phosphocreatine and ATP and was unresponsive to psychotropic medications prior to creatine supplementation. Following daily supplementation this patient reported improvements on measures of depression and fibromyalgia and showed a 30% improvement in her overall quality of life. An open-label, add-on trial found that creatine improved symptoms in men and women with treatment resistant PTSD, with the greatest benefit in patients diagnosed with comorbid depression (Amital et al., 2006a).
There is considerable evidence to support creatine as a biological correlate of psychopathology. Examinations of creatine metabolites in vivo reliably detected differences in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, particularly in the frontal and limbic regions, but the direction of these differences were less consistent. The majority of spectroscopy data for depression did not detect differences in creatine metabolism. Nonetheless, significant reductions in frontal and white matter creatine and decreased serum creatine kinase activity were reported for severe cases of depression, suggesting altered creatine metabolism is related to the course of the disorder. Too few studies are available to draw conclusions for anxiety disorders. Summarized below are important clinical considerations for future preclinical and clinical research designs, including a discussion on how creatine fits into existing pharmacological mechanisms and sex differences in creatine metabolism and treatment response. Finally, methodological challenges inherent in current research will be discussed.
Alterations in the creatine circuit observed in psychiatric populations are presumed to be a compensatory mechanism initiated by neurons to combat general metabolic deficits. Mitochondrial dysfunction in mental illness has been hypothesized to reflect a shift from the rapid creatine circuit towards the less efficient, time-consuming glycolysis pathway to keep up with energy requirements (Stork and Renshaw, 2005). In the simplest terms, significant energy demands reduce ATP availability (hypometabolism), thereby stimulating creatine kinase activity to use remaining phosphocreatine stores to maintain energy homeostasis (Figure 1). Constant exhaustion of phosphocreatine may contribute to impairments in cognitive function or altered mood because the brain has to rely on the catabolism of glucose, which is slower and less effective at replenishing ATP than phosphocreatine. Mentally ill individuals may benefit from creatine monohydrate because daily long-term supplementation increases brain levels of phosphocreatine (see Section 2.1.).
Some of the human trials reviewed above are supportive of this premise. Chronic administration of creatine monohydrate improves symptoms of depression and PTSD in humans and female rats (Allen et al., 2010; Amital et al., 2008; Roitman et al., 2007). However, there was no benefit of creatine for treating schizophrenia, and some evidence suggested that creatine is contraindicated for bipolar disorder, specifically by triggering manic switch in two patients post-supplementation (Roitman et al., 2007). Lastly, three studies have found increased symptoms of depression or anxiety in men and male rats (Section 3.2.5). These negative reports are unsettling because there also exist two MRS studies that demonstrated creatine monohydrate, administered daily to healthy young adults (between 20–30 years old), reduced metabolite levels associated with neuronal integrity, function, and energy homeostasis, namely N-acetylcholine (NAA), choline and ATP (Dechent et al., 1999, Lyoo et al., 2003; for review of metabolites, see Kondo et al., 2011a). In particular, Dechent et al. (1999) found reduced brain levels of NAA in the thalamus and cerebellum and decreased choline in the thalamus only following administration of creatine monohydrate (4 × 5 g per day) for four weeks. Lyoo et al. (2003) observed reduced β-NTP, a measure that mainly reflects ATP signaling, following administration of creatine monohydrate (0.03 g/kg – 0.3g/kg) for two weeks. Lyoo et al. hypothesized that the brain needs to make compensatory changes, expressly by reducing ATP synthesis, to maintain energy balance in response to significant increases in creatine and phosphocreatine. Taken together, it is plausible that creatine supplementation benefits metabolically impaired brains (e.g. psychiatric patients) with exhausted phosphocreatine stores but can be harmful when over-saturating otherwise healthy brains by shifting metabolite concentrations to preserve equilibrium. Nevertheless, these contradictory biochemical and behavioral outcomes in the creatine literature highlight the need to advance current knowledge of the neurobiological mechanisms of creatine’s actions to determine its level of efficacy and safety.
Our current understanding of the potential therapeutic mechanisms of creatine action has largely been facilitated by promising research on the use of dietary creatine to treat numerous neurodegenerative disorders linked with mitochondrial dysfunction and brain atrophy, including Huntington’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (for review, see Allen et al., 2011; Andres et al., 2008; Gualano et al., 2010; Wyss and Schulze, 2002). Dietary creatine confers neuroprotection against a range of toxic substances and can minimize physical damage from traumatic insults in rodent models of disease (Brustovetsky et al., 2001; Matthews et al., 1998; 1999; Sullivan et al., 2000; Roy et al., 2002). The proposed mechanisms underlying these effects include the ability of creatine to increase energy availability, to promote neuronal proliferation and survival, and to reduce oxidative stress, apoptosis and necrosis of neurons (Andres et al., 2005; Brdiczka et al., 1998; Dolder et al., 2003; Ducray et al., 2007a, b; Lawler et al., 2001; Sestilli et al., 2006, 2011).
The antioxidant effects of creatine are one plausible neurobiological mechanism for the treatment of psychiatric disease. Metabolic disturbances in the frontal and limbic regions have been described for schizophrenia, mood and anxiety disorders (see Section 4.2.). Briefly, a decline in ATP concentrations, which is typically observed in psychiatric illness, leads to an accumulation of intracellular calcium (Ca2+), the formation of radical and reactive oxygen species, and ultimately mitochondrial damage from oxidative stress. Creatine supplementation prevents oxidative damage through direct antioxidant activity in mammalian cell cultures (Lawler et al., 2002; Sestili et al., 2006; Young et al., 2010).
Creatine also has a neuromodulatory function in the CNS, and may influence neurotransmitter systems or neuroplasticity factors associated with mental illness. Evidence indicates that creatine can be released in an excitotic, action-potential dependent manner in response to membrane depolarization (Almeida et al., 2006). Specifically, researchers have demonstrated that depolarization of rat brain tissue produced an influx of Ca2+ and then subsequent release of creatine. When Ca2+ was not present or when Na+ channels were blocked by tetrodotoxin, creatine was not released. This is usually typical of neurotransmitter release. This and other work indicates that creatine acts as a partial agonist of central GABAA receptors (Almeida et al., 2006; Koga et al., 2005), and creatine has also been shown to modify NMDA receptor activity (Oliveira et al., 2008; Royes et al., 2008). Other evidence has suggested creatine is related to serotonin and dopamine (Agren and Niklasson, 1988; Allen et al., 2010; Andres et al., 2005). Nevertheless, it is clear that significantly more research is needed to understand how creatine interacts with neurotransmitter systems and where in the brain these changes occur.
Another possible mechanism of therapeutic action for treating psychiatric disorders involves the relationship between creatine and one-carbon metabolism. As mentioned previously (Figure 1), de novo creatine synthesis is metabolically demanding because it requires up to 70% of available SAMe, the universal methyl donor (Brosnan et al., 2007; Mudd and Poole, 1975; Stead et al., 2001; Wyss and Walliman, 1994). Consequently, less SAMe is available for other essential reactions, like the methylation of neurotransmitters that are important for mood regulation and cognition, including dopamine and serotonin. Creatine supplementation may exert antidepressant effects because increased dietary intake reduces the need for de novo synthesis of creatine and increases available SAMe (Stead et al., 2001). Further, creatine supplementation lowers homocysteine concentrations (Deminice et al., 2008; Korzun, 2004; Lobley et al., 1996; Stead et al., 2001), and elevated homocysteine levels are increasingly being associated with psychopathology (Almeida et al., 2008; Bjelland et al., 2003; Muntjewerff et al., 2006; Osher et al., 2004).
An important question is whether alterations in creatine metabolism are a function of the course of psychiatric illness or due to predisposing genetic factors. In the research described, abnormal creatine metabolism in the frontal and limbic regions in schizophrenia, mood and anxiety disorders is correlated with a less favorable course and outcome of illness. However, this evidence is insufficient to parse out the contributions of mood states, treatment, and neurodevelopment to changes in the creatine circuit. Does creatine metabolism influence mood states, or do mood states influence creatine metabolism? Perhaps there is a third variable that mediates this relationship. Another important question, if these changes in creatine are reliable, is whether creatine values can predict the severity of disease or treatment success.
Research is now beginning to clarify whether altered creatine metabolism represents trait or state markers of mental illness. For instance, healthy adolescents at high risk of developing schizophrenia, defined as having at least one first-degree schizophrenic relative, exhibited significantly less total creatine in the caudate than healthy low-risk controls (Keshavan et al., 2009) and trended towards less phosphocreatine in the frontal region (Klemm et al., 2001), which supports trait-dependency. On the other hand, in a study of twin pairs discordant for schizophrenia, affected twins exhibited greater total hippocampal creatine than unaffected co-twins, which suggests creatine is a disease-state marker for schizophrenia (Lutkenhoff et al., 2010).
Other intriguing genetic findings have associated alterations in brain creatine metabolism with a functional polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene, which substitutes a valine for a methionine at the codon 66 (val66met)(for review, see Dincheva et al., 2012). Briefly, BDNF is an essential mediator of synaptic plasticity that is linked with energy metabolism. Met-carriers (val/met) exhibit cognitive and neuronal abnormalities, have increased risk of psychopathology, and tend to show poorer clinical outcome (Forlenza et al., 2010, Hashimoto et al., 2010; Vinberg et al., 2009; Spalletta et al., 2010). With regard to creatine metabolism, it was found that bipolar met-carriers exhibited less total creatine in the left DLPFC than val/val bipolar patients, and val/val patients had greater total creatine than val/val healthy controls (Frey et al., 2007b). This BDNF polymorphism has also been associated with reduced hippocampal creatine metabolism in healthy met-carriers (Gallinat et al., 2010).
Though studies are beginning to indicate that alterations in creatine metabolism are genetically driven, it is debatable whether components of this system can be used as meaningful diagnostic markers. As discussed above, multiple disorders exhibit similar deficits in creatine metabolism in the frontal and limbic regions, meaning this marker likely represents a broader metabolic dilemma. In addition, altered serum creatine kinase activity is not diagnosis-specific, but rather it appears that marked changes are symptom-specific (e.g., mood state, excitation, psychosis, or agitation). For instance, significant elevations in creatine kinase activity have been observed during acute psychosis in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, when patients reported experiencing grandiose ideas, auditory hallucinations, disorientation, or aggressive behavior (see Sections 4.2.2. Schizophrenia and 22.214.171.124 Bipolar Disorder; Danivas et al., 2010). It is probable that increased psychomotor activity that is associated with acute psychosis, and perhaps antipsychotic drug treatment, influence creatine metabolism. Further complicating matters, marked elevations in creatine kinase have not been consistently observed in cases of acute psychosis (Tuason et al., 1974), and have also been described in nonpsychotic depressed patients compared to psychotic depressed patients (Segal et al., 2007) and in non-psychotic chronic alcoholics (Ikeda et al., 1977).
Nevertheless, creatine, phosphocreatine, and creatine kinase abnormalities do commonly occur in psychiatric disorders, and a less favorable outcome is associated with greater impairments in creatine metabolism (state marker). These changes likely represent general metabolic deficits that are similar across psychiatric disorders but are not sensitive or specific enough for diagnostic purposes (Segal et al., 2007). An important avenue for consideration is the potential for creatine metabolism to serve as a treatment marker. Few studies have investigated this possibility, but creatine metabolism may be an important therapeutic target for pharmacological agents known to improve psychiatric symptoms (Iosifescu et al., 2003).
Antidepressants may exert their effects through modulation of energy metabolism. Recent investigations have found that different classes of psychoactive drugs affect different components of the creatine-phosphocreatine system in various ways. A novel hypothesis currently under investigation is whether dietary creatine supplementation can enhance the effects of psychoactive drugs or reduce associated side effects (see Section 126.96.36.199. Major Depressive Disorders; Allen et al., in press; Kondo et al., 2011b).
In the case of SSRIs, it has been shown in rats that four weeks of paroxetine (Paxil) increased creatine transport to the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (Lugenbiel et al., 2010), and fluoxetine (Prozac) and escitalopram (Lexapro) both altered creatine kinase activity in hippocampus, striatum, and prefrontal cortex, albeit in different directions (Agostinho et al., 2009; Santos et al., 2009). In the case of mixed or dual uptake inhibitors, four weeks of either clomipramine (Anafranil) or tianeptine (Stablon) have been shown to normalize total creatine in the forebrain of stressed tree shrews (Czéh et al., 2001; Fuchs et al., 2002; van der Hart et al., 2002), four weeks of desipramine (Norpramine) increased total creatine in the DLPFC of male C57BL/6 mice (Kim et al., 2010), and acute imipramine (Tofranil) increased creatine kinase activity in the striatum, cerebellum, and PFC of rats (Assis et al., 2009; Réus et al., 2011, 2012). For atypical antipsychotics, acute treatment with aripiprazole (Abilify) or olanzapine (Zyprexa) increased creatine kinase activity in the striatum and cerebellum (Assis et al., 2009). Moreover, combined antipsychotic and SSRI treatment using Prozac and Zyprexa has been shown to decrease creatine kinase activity in the cerebellum, striatum, and PFC after four weeks of treatment in rats (Agostinho et al., 2009). The mood stabilizers lithium (Eskalith) and valproate (Depakote) decreased total creatine in the whole brain of rats after two weeks of treatment (O’Donnell et al., 2000), and the anesthetic ketamine (Ketalar) increased creatine kinase the striatum, cerebellum, and PFC (Assis et al., 2009). Varying protocols of electroconvulsive shock have been shown to increase creatine transport (Lugenbiel et al., 2010), increase total creatine in the hippocampus (Sartorious et al., 2003), and alter creatine kinase in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, and pons/medulla (Búrigo et al., 2006; Erakovic et al., 2001). In sum, psychoactive drugs alter creatine, phosphocreatine, or creatine kinase activity, but it is also evident that the direction and brain regions affected vary on the basis of drug class, dosage, and administration schedule.
Another clinically important development comes from a growing number of reports finding that the relationship between creatine and mood is sex-dependent (Allen et al., 2010, Hamakawa et al., 1999; Kato et al., 1992, 1994; Nery et al., 2009; Moore et al., 1997; Volz et al., 1998). Generally, sex differences have been observed in creatine transport into the brain, total creatine concentrations, and patterns of creatine kinase expression and activity levels (Gledhill et al., 1988; Hamakawa et al., 1999; Ramirez and Jimenez, 2002; Riehemann et al., 1999; Wong et al., 1983). For instance, it has been reported that healthy women have less phosphocreatine in the frontal lobe compared to healthy men (Riehemann et al., 1999). Moreover, female bipolar and depressed patients have lower creatine levels in the right frontal lobe compared with male patients (Hamakawa et al., 1999). Given this evidence, gender differences in creatine metabolism may confer differences in therapeutic efficacy of creatine supplementation.
Preclinical studies are increasingly substantiating this premise. Long-term creatine supplementation showed significant benefit in female rats, but not male rats, in an animal model of antidepressant efficacy (Allen et al., 2010), and this effect is most robust when levels of ovarian hormones are highest (Allen et al., in press). Further, studies of electroconvulsive shock therapy (ECS) in rats show sex-dependent differences in creatine metabolism in brain regions associated with depression, expressly increasing creatine kinase activity in females (Erakovic et al., 2001) but decreased creatine kinase activity in males (Búrigo et al., 2006).
Equally fascinating are results of a recent spectroscopy study, which revealed a gender by diagnosis interaction of total creatine within the DLPFC. Specifically, total creatine levels in depressed men were lower than those in healthy men whereas creatine in depressed women were higher than those in healthy women (Nery et al., 2009). These observations are especially important because depression is twice as common in women than men (Bebbington et al., 2003; Kessler et al., 2003), and studies have reported that women experience longer depressive episodes, report greater distress, are more severely impaired, are more likely to attempt suicide, and relapse more frequently than men (Kornstein et al., 2000; Marcus et al., 2005; Nolen-Hoeksema, 1993; Young et al., 2009).
The neural mechanisms underlying sex-specific creatine alterations are unknown, however it is likely that organizational and/or activational effects of sex hormones are implicated (Allen et al., 2010). All together, these studies provide the impetus for more basic and translational research on sex differences in creatine metabolism. Advancements in this area could possibly lead to sex-specific therapeutic strategies in the treatment of brain-related disorders.
Several unavoidable difficulties inherent in psychiatric research have limited the interpretation of brain creatine metabolism and treatment effects in humans. Generally speaking, the most significant issues observed in the research evaluated in this review include the recruitment of small sample sizes, use of a single creatine dosage, diagnostic validity, diagnostic comorbidity, concomitant medication use, lack of placebo control, and add-on intervention designs. Additionally, because of the novelty of this topic, there are a limited number of published reports and many have not yet been replicated.
One important issue relates to the recruitment of adequate sample sizes within specific patient populations. Psychiatric patients are burdened by significant emotional, social, or occupational impairments that make it difficult for these individuals to complete studies or adhere to medications. This is particularly true of neuroimaging work, given the anxiogenic nature of brain scanning procedures. For instance, it has been difficult for investigators to compare differences in creatine metabolism in patients suffering from anxiety disorders. As a result, few imaging studies on creatine and anxiety are available for evaluation in the present review. Of the available evidence for schizophrenia and mood disorders, many studies have included patient populations with multiple diagnoses of psychopathology (e.g., Roitman et al., 2007).
Another issue is the ethical dilemma associated with discontinuing psychotropic medications in at-risk psychiatric patients. However, inconsistencies in the directionality of creatine metabolite changes may be a function of medication status. Concomitant medication use was most often reported in studies of schizophrenia. Medicated schizophrenics with neuroleptics have displayed greater phosphocreatine levels than unmedicated patients and healthy controls in the frontal lobes (Jayakumar et al., 2010; Volz et al., 1997; Volz et al., 2000). Another report found that benzodiazepine use positively correlated with total creatine levels in the left basal ganglia of schizophrenic patients and healthy controls (Tayoshi et al., 2009). Moreover, low baseline levels of phosphocreatine in medication-free schizophrenics normalized after one year of antipsychotic treatment, and this change in metabolic activity was associated with symptom improvement (Jayakumar et al., 2010). However, the possibility that neuroleptic medications confound creatine metabolism is not clear-cut because other studies exist that have not observed differences in phosphocreatine as a function of neuroleptic medications (Deicken et al., 1995; Ohrmann et al., 2007; Volz et al., 1998b). Similarly, in the case of mood disorders, use of mood stabilizers or antidepressants may obscure differences in creatine metabolism, especially in mild cases, as animal studies have shown that these drugs alter total creatine and creatine kinase (see Section 5.3.).
A more general issue that has limited available neuroimaging evidence, and consequently our understanding of creatine alterations in psychiatric populations, is the use of ratio calculations in studies using MRS. In the present review, only studies that reported absolute concentrations of phosphocreatine or total creatine (creatine + phosphocreatine) were considered. It is common practice for MRS studies to report ratio calculations (e.g., choline/creatine or N-acetyl-aspartate/creatine) because creatine is typically used as an internal standard (Malhi et al., 2002). However, because creatine is not stable under stressful conditions and differences in brain creatine metabolism are observed in most psychiatric populations, it is impossible to separate out the direction of creatine changes from ratio measures. When metabolite values are combined, it is impossible to know how the signals for creatine, phosphocreatine, and creatine kinase change individually with respect to the equation for the creatine-phosphocreatine equilibrium reaction (Figure 1).
The described methodological challenges obscure the relationship between brain creatine and the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders. In summary, these issues highlight the need for caution when interpreting the positive findings for creatine in treating depression and anxiety-related disorders. The few extant clinical studies recruited small comorbid samples and did not include a placebo comparison group. In addition, because these studies used add-on designs, it is unknown whether treatment with creatine alone is effective or if the benefits of creatine occur in combination with psychotropic medications.
The ability of dietary creatine to alter brain energetics, promote neurogenesis, and improve brain function safely and effectively is opening up the exciting possibility for creatine monohydrate to provide a novel, natural strategy for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. To overcome methodological hurdles described in previous studies, it is advised that greater attention be paid to the dose and duration of creatine supplementation, as well as individual patient characteristics, such as age, sex, medical condition, genetic origin, or severity of psychiatric symptoms, which may alter the effects of creatine in the brain. The ideal clinical trial would take these factors into consideration, implement selective screening practices (e.g., exclude comorbidity), recruit large samples of men and women, evaluate multiple endpoints for response and remission, and assess changes in brain creatine and phosphocreatine levels in vivo using neuroimaging techniques concomitantly with neurocognitive testing. In addition, cause-and-effect evidence from animal models and cellular studies are needed to advance mechanistic understanding, particularly in terms of identifying the location, function, and severity of creatine alterations in the brain that are associated with cognitive and emotional dysfunction.
Too few data are available to advise on when or how much creatine is required to produce therapeutic effects in psychiatric populations. The difficulty in characterizing the value of creatine supplementation is in part due to differences in study design (add-on versus monotherapy, comorbid diagnoses, differing doses, dietary influences). Some investigators have proposed that therapeutic intervention should be defined as more than 6 g daily in humans, which is three-times greater than the normal ~2 g daily clearance rate (Benzi, 2000). However, many clinical trials (other than studies of individuals with inborn errors of creatine metabolism) have treated patients with 5 g or less because possible side effects of larger doses have not been carefully investigated. Nonetheless, given the severity of metabolic impairments observed, psychiatric patients may benefit from larger daily doses in the 20–40 g range (administered in smaller 5 g doses, 4x day for optimal bioavailability), as in the cases for other brain-related disorders with significant metabolic impairments, like creatine deficiency syndromes. As such, careful documentation of side effects of doses greater than 5 g daily is strongly encouraged. This is especially important in consideration of reports finding that creatine supplementation can adversely affect mood (Allen et al., 2010; Roitman et al., 2007; Volek et al., 2000). Ultimately, further work is required to titrate the optimal dose of creatine given the population being studied because metabolic need will likely vary as a function of age, gender, physical activity, and brain-related pathology. Assessment of multiple doses and schedules of creatine administration is needed to clarify whether creatine kinetics are sex- or diagnosis-dependent.
The classical and nontraditional mechanisms of creatine action remain important avenues of research that could pave the way for the development of complementary or alternative treatments strategies. For instance, few studies have directly evaluated the potential for creatine monohydrate to oppose the negative consequences of stress on the brain, but future research elucidating the neural mechanisms could aid in the understanding of stress-related psychiatric disorders. More work using animal models of psychopathology are encouraged to enhance our mechanistic understanding of how endogenous creatine influences neurochemistry and behavior, how creatine supplementation might mitigate the effects of stress on these parameters, and how other agents with therapeutic efficacy affect the creatine-phosphocreatine circuit. More rigorous clinical trials are needed to determine the true safety and efficacy of creatine to treat or prevent mental illness.
More generally speaking, basic and translational research on CAM therapy should be made a priority to help clinicians and patients make informed decisions, as trends indicate the use of these novel strategies will continue to increase. Cognitive and emotional health is strongly associated with the quality of the diet because of the important role micronutrients and macronutrients have in brain structure, function, and development (Bodnar and Wisner, 2005; Christensen, 2001; Lieberman, 2003; McGowan et al., 2008). Food constituents provide the building blocks for cell growth and proliferation, as well as participate in neurotransmitter synthesis, synaptic transmission, neural plasticity, gene expression, and energy metabolism. Of significance, poor dietary patterns are linked with increased risk of mental illness (Akbaraly et al., 2009; Jacka et al., 2010, 2011; Kuczmarski et al., 2010; Li et al., 2010; Sanchez-Villegas et al., 2009), which may be prevented by informed use of dietary supplements like creatine, either as monotherapy or adjunct therapy with conventional psychotropic medications (Bodnar and Wisner, 2005). Taken together, understanding the complex relationships between dietary factors and the pathogenesis of psychopathology may uncover innovative targets for drug action to improve treatment options.
An increasingly burgeoning area of research, the role of creatine in developing and maintaining brain health cannot be understated. This accumulation of positive reports should encourage scientific inquiry among psychology, neuroscience and nutrition communities to further clarify the importance of creatine in cognition and emotion. Greater understanding of relationships between the creatine-phosphocreatine circuit and psychiatric disorders may inspire innovative strategies to treat or prevent these disorders. Creatine supplementation has the potential to serve as an adjunct for treatment, but because this compound is still the early stages of investigation, an affirmative answer would be premature. More rigorous clinical designs need to be carried out, and the pharmacokinetics and dose-response effects in psychiatric populations need to be more thoroughly described.
I am grateful to the Tufts Psychology Department for encouraging fourth year doctoral students to write and publish reviews in their area of expertise, as well as to Robin Kanarek and Gina Kuperberg for feedback that greatly improved the manuscript. Financial support was provided by Award Number F31AT006292 from the National Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of NCCAM or the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.