Our results suggest that serum concentrations of PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and PFHxS in our study population increased from birth until < 13 years of age. Those in the youngest group, 0 to < 3 years, have significantly lower PFC serum concentrations than those in groups 6 to < 9 or 9 to < 13, except for PFOA and PFNA in boys. It is possible that concentrations may increase with age partly because of cumulative exposures to PFCs via food and dust intake (
Fromme et al. 2009). It is also possible that younger children in our study population experienced lower exposure to some PFCs than older children, because PFOS production stopped in 2002 in the United States (3M Company 2000), and PFOA release during manufacturing has declined since the early 2000s (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2006). The discontinuation of production of some of these chemicals, coupled with their relatively long half-life, could explain why older children had higher levels of these chemicals. However, the relevance of the changes in manufacturing practices is difficult to determine, given the persistent nature of PFCs and the lack of information on baseline levels (e.g., PFC concentrations in the early 2000s for the older children) and on exposure pathways for our study population. Except for age and sex of the children, information on individual factors that might influence PFC levels, such as breast-feeding history, was not available, thus making it difficult to assess potential determinants of exposure (
Fromme et al. 2010).
Others have reported an association between age and PFC serum concentrations.
Zhang et al. (2010b) observed significant positive associations between age and whole blood concentrations of several PFCs, including PFHxS, PFOS, PFNA, and PFDA, but not PFOA, in 184 Chinese children 0–10 years of age. The authors speculated that these associations might have been related to dietary exposures, as PFCs have been detected in food worldwide (
Zhang et al. 2010b). A positive association between age and PFC serum concentrations was also reported among adults in Norway and Australia (
Haug et al. 2009;
Kärrman et al. 2006) but was not evident in a study of convenience samples of blood, plasma, and serum from volunteer donors in the United States, Colombia, Belgium, Malaysia, Korea, and other countries (20–75 samples per source population) (
Kannan et al. 2004).
There are conflicting data regarding sex differences in PFC concentrations in children.
Zhang et al. (2010b) noted that median concentrations of four PFCs, including PFNA, PFOA, and PFOS, were slightly higher in whole blood samples from Chinese females (
n = 82) compared with males (
n = 163) 0–90 years of age. Results from a study using sera collected in southeast Queensland, Australia, in 2006–2007 from 2,420 donors 0 to > 60 years of age and pooled according to age showed no apparent sex differences in children (< 12 years of age) (
Toms et al. 2009). In the present study, we also did not find a difference in children’s PFC serum concentrations based on sex.
The higher detection frequency for Me-PFOSA-AcOH versus Et-PFOSA-AcOH in our study population may be related to the use of these chemicals and subsequent exposure routes for children: Me-PFOSA-AcOH is an oxidation product of 2-(
N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamide) ethanol, used in carpets and textiles, whereas Et-PFOSA-AcOH is used in paper products (
Kato et al. 2009a;
Olsen et al. 2003).
In this study, we report serum PFC concentrations, which are measures of internal exposure, without attempting to address external exposures in a population of children in Dallas, Texas. These values were lower than concentrations measured previously by others at different times, locations, and ages both in the United States and other countries. Differences in PFC concentrations in our study population compared with others may also be related to age, country, use of whole blood versus serum, pooled versus individual sampling, or the timing of specimen collection, which occurred later than in other studies and several years after production of some PFCs ceased in the United States (
Calafat et al. 2006,
2007a,
2007b;
CDC 2010;
Guruge et al. 2005;
Hemat et al. 2010;
Hölzer et al. 2008;
Kato et al. 2009b;
Olsen et al. 2004;
Spliethoff et al. 2008;
Toms et al. 2009;
Zhang et al. 2010b).
Higher serum concentrations of PFOS, PFHxS, and PFOA were reported by
Frisbee et al. (2009,
2010) for children living in areas of the United States with known environmental PFOA contamination. However, PFNA concentrations were similar in the C8 study population (median, 1.6 ng/ mL) and our study population (median, 1.2 ng/ mL) (
Frisbee et al. 2009,
2010). Median concentrations from birth to < 13 years were lower in our study population than median concentrations reported for NHANES 2007–2008 ages 12–19 years (357 samples) for PFOS (11.3 ng/mL), PFOA (4.0 ng/mL), and PFHxS (2.3 ng/mL) and slightly higher for PFNA (1.4 ng/mL) (
Kato et al. 2011). Our findings for Texas children from birth through 1 year in 2009 are consistent with ranges of median values reported for 110 pooled blood spot samples taken at birth for congenital disease testing in 2,640 New York infants born between 1997 and 2007 (
Spliethoff et al. 2008). Concentrations in children from birth through age 1 year are also consistent with median concentrations in dried blood spots (generally from 2-day-old children) from 98 infants born in Texas in May 2007 (
Kato et al. 2009b).
Dried blood spots may provide a potential matrix for assessing exposure to certain PFCs. We believe that blood spots, because of ease of collection compared with venipuncture, may play a role in the future for estimation of internal exposure to PFCs. To the best of our knowledge, partitioning ratios between blood spot and serum PFC levels have not yet been determined even as partial validation for the use of blood spots from whole blood instead of serum PFC measurements, the current gold standard for biomonitoring. We include previous dried blood spot results only as illustrative of other PFC exposure studies in children using different approaches rather than the validated (serum) methods we employed. Our study of Dallas children is representative only of children < 12 years of age who had blood samples drawn at Children’s Medical Center. Further research should be performed in a large representative sample to determine the serum concentrations of young children in the United States.