1. McDermott JH. The origins of music: innateness, uniqueness, and evolution. Music Perception. 2005;23:29–59.
2. Fitch W. The biology and evolution of music: A comparative perspective. Cognition. 2006;100:173–215. [PubMed] 3. McDermott J. The evolution of music. Nature. 2008;453:287–288. [PubMed]
4. Trehub SE, Nakata T. Musicae Scientiae; 2001. Emotion and music in infancy. pp. 37–61.
5. Pinker S. New York: Norton; 1997. How the mind works.
6. Merker B. Synchronous chorusing and human origins. In: Wallin NL, Merker, B, Brown, S, editors. The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT press; 2000. pp. 315–327.
7. Trehub SE. The developmental origins of musicality. Nature Neuroscience. 2003;6:669–673. [PubMed]
8. Darwin C. London: MURRAY; 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex.
9. Miller G. The evolution of human music through sexual selection. In: Wallin NL, Merker, B, Brown, S, editors. The origins of music. Cambridge: MIT press; 2000. pp. 329–360.
10. Falk D. Hominid brain evolution and the origins of music. In: Wallin NL, Merker, B, Brown, S, editors. The Origins of Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000. pp. 197–216.
11. Gaab N, Keenan J, Schlaug G. The effects of gender on the neural substrates of pitch memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003;15:810–820. [PubMed]
12. Turino T. The charango and the“ Sirena”: music, magic, and the power of love. Latin American Music Review/Revista de Musica Latinoamericana. 1983;4:81–119.
13. Sluming VA, Manning JT. Second to fourth digit ratio in elite musicians: Evidence for musical ability as an honest signal of male fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2000;21:1–9.
14. Ryan MJ. Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science. 1998;281:1999–2003. [PubMed] 15. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2008;275:991–1000. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 16. Sanders G, Wenmoth D. Verbal and music dichotic listening tasks reveal variations in functional cerebral asymmetry across the menstrual cycle that are phase and task dependent. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36:869–874. [PubMed] 17. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. The New England journal of medicine. 1995;333:1517–1521. [PubMed]
18. Ziv N, Keydar E. The relationship between creative potential, aesthetic response to music, and musical preferences. Creativity Research Journal. 2009;21:125–133.
19. North AC, Hargreaves DJ. Subjective complexity, familiarity, and liking for popular music. Psychomusicology. 1995;14:77–93.
20. Heyduk R. Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency. Perception and Psychophysics. 1975;17:84–90.
21. Steck L, Machotka P. Preference for musical complexity: Effects of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1975;1:170–174.
22. Beauvois M. Quantifying aesthetic preference and perceived complexity for fractal melodies. Music Perception. 2007;24:247–264.
23. Vitz PC. Affect as a function of stimulus variation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1966;71:74–79. [PubMed] 24. Smith JD, Melara RA. Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: 'Tis the gift to be simple. Cognition. 1990;34:279–298. [PubMed]
25. Orr M, Ohlsson S. The relationship between musical complexity and liking in jazz and bluegrass. Psychology of Music. 2001;29:108.
26. Orr MG, Ohlsson S. Relationship between complexity and liking as a function of expertise. Music Perception. 2005;22:583–611.
27. Konecni VJ, Sargent-Pollock D. Choice between melodies differing in complexity under divided-attention conditions. Journal of experimental psychology Human perception and performance. 1976;2:347–356. [PubMed]
28. Schroeder MR. Freeman WH, editor. New York; 1991. Fractals, chaos, power laws: minutes from an infinite paradise.
29. Longuet-Higgins HC, Lee CS. The rhythmic interpretation of monophonic music. Music Perception. 1984;1:424–441.
30. Fitch WT, Rosenfeld AJ. Perception and production of syncopated rhythms. Music Perception. 2007;25:43–58.
31. Lynch CD, Jackson LW, Buck Louis GM. Estimation of the day-specific probabilities of conception: current state of the knowledge and the relevance for epidemiological research. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2006;20:3–12. [PubMed]
32. Meadowcroft J, Zillmann D. Women's comedy preferences during the menstrual cycle. Communication Research. 1987;14:204–218.
33. Gangestad S, Garver-Apgar C, Simpson J, Cousins A. Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:151–163. [PubMed] 34. Maynard Smith J. Theories of Sexual Selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1991;6:146–151. [PubMed]
35. Charlton BD. Weber EA, Krause, L H, editors. Female mate choice in nonhuman mammals. Animal Behavior: New Research: Nova Science Publishers Inc. 2008. pp. 35–56.
36. Haselton M, Miller G. Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature. 2006;17:50–73.
37. Chapin H, Jantzen K, Scott Kelso J, Steinberg F, Large E. Dynamic emotional and neural responses to music depend on performance expression and listener experience. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13812. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Nettl B. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1956. Music in primitive culture.
39. Apicella CL, Feinberg DR. Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2009;276:1077–1082. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 40. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Law-Smith MJ, Moore FR, DeBruine LM, et al. Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones And Behavior. 2006;49:215–222. [PubMed]
41. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour. 2005;69:561–568.
42. Evans S, Neave N, Wakelin D. Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: An evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biological Psychology. 2006;72:160–163. [PubMed] 43. Evans S, Neave N, Wakelin D, Hamilton C. The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. Physiology & Behavior. 2008;93:783–788. [PubMed]