Here, we present evidence of positive and negative associations between
HLA-DQB1*05 and
*06 alleles and risk of FL, respectively. These results confirm our previous findings of an association between FL risk and SNPs in the
HLA-DRB1*0101
—HLA-DQA1*0101
—HLA-DQB1*0501 extended haplotype. A recent study reported that
HLA-DRB1*0101 was associated with increased risk for FL, whereas
HLA-DRB1*13 was inversely associated with FL risk
14. These alleles are in strong LD with
HLA-DQB1*0501 and
HLA-DQB1*06, respectively. Thus, our results highlight the need for further studies to determine whether
HLA-DQB1 alleles,
HLA-DRB1 alleles, or some other gene variant(s), are causal in the pathogenesis of FL. Due to extended LD in the
HLA region, a typing study of non-Europeans with different LD patterns will aid in differentiating disease association signals in
HLA-DRB1 from those in
HLA-DQB1.
HLA alleles associated with disease risk may alter the presentation of specific antigens of autoimmune or infectious origin, and thereby influence the immune response. For example, with type-1 diabetes the significant association between
HLA class II alleles and disease risk
15 is attributed to differential presentation of insulin by specific
HLA class II protein isoforms
16,17. This, in turn, effects T-cell mediated destruction of insulin-secreting pancreatic β-cells. Similar models have been proposed to explain associations of
HLA alleles with narcolepsy, celiac disease, and rheumatoid arthritis
17. Although it is possible that FL pathogenesis is initiated by a similar mechanism dependent on a single antigen, a more generalized mechanism may be at play. Comparisons of the strength of associations between risk alleles and disease implicate a unique causal pathway for FL. In the cases of narcolepsy, celiac disease, and rheumatoid arthritis, >90% of patients are carriers of a risk allele
17. In contrast, 43% of FL cases in this study carried an
HLA-DQB1*05 allele. This implies a more subtle increase in risk per allele, or perhaps heterogeneity in the causal pathways in FL patients.
Changes in specific amino acids in HLA proteins are one reason that different immune systems may respond differently to the same antigen. Polymorphisms in the polypeptide binding groove can affect preference of the polypeptides to be presented to T-cells
18 and thereby influence the immune response. For example, if we compare
HLA-DQB1*0501 and
HLA-DQB1*0602 (
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/imgt/hla/), seven amino acid changes are in pockets known to influence antigen binding or interaction with the T-cell receptor
17–19. If these amino acid changes affect the immune response to an antigen, it could conceivably influence susceptibility to FL via several mechanisms such as chronic immune activation, T-cell receptor stimulation or effects on HLA gene expression on antigen presenting cells.
Chronic immune activation is one proposed mechanism of lymphomagenesis that may explain the association of
HLA class II alleles with FL risk. B-cell proliferation is dependent on two signals, the first resulting from B-cell receptor interactions with antigen, and the second resulting from HLA class II-bound antigen-peptide interactions with T-cells
20. This two-part signal leads to clonal proliferation, class switch recombination and somatic hypermutation of B-cells. Chronic immune activation ensues when an autoantigen or a chronic infectious agent repeatedly provides growth signals to B-cells. Because class switch recombination and somatic hypermutation have been associated with DNA strand breaks, this process is potentially oncogenic and has been proposed as a mechanism of B-cell lymphomagenesis
21. The extent that a given antigen will cause chronic B-cell stimulation may be modified by the polymorphisms which define HLA class II alleles.
Interactions with regulatory T-cells (T
regs) represent a second mechanism in which a differentially presented antigen could affect FL risk. B-cell NHL tumors contain high levels of T
regs compared to control tissues, and these T
regs suppress proliferation of tumor fighting CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells
22,23. Recent evidence indicates that T-helper cells can be converted to T
regs by malignant FL B-cells in a process involving T-cell receptor stimulation
24. Because HLA class II molecules interact with the T-cell receptor, this suggests a role for HLA alleles in the generation of T
regs. If an antigen, unique to FL, were differentially presented by the
HLA class II alleles, it could possibly affect T
regs levels, thus modifying FL risk. The anti-apoptotic protein,
BCL-2, which is up-regulated in FL due to the t(14:18) translocation, may be a plausible candidate antigen that is unique for FL. Further studies will be needed to determine the potential role of T
regs as a possible causal intermediate between
HLA class II alleles and FL risk.
FL immune evasion may also be caused by decreased
HLA class II protein expression. Decreased HLA class II protein expression has been linked to poor survival in DLBCL patients, likely the result of decreased immune surveillance
25. Additional research will be needed to assess the role of survival and
HLA class II expression in FL, and the role that HLA allelotypes play on expression of
HLA class II proteins.
In summary, this paper provides further evidence that HLA-DQB1*05 is associated with FL risk, and demonstrates a novel inverse association between HLA-DQB1*06 alleles and FL risk. Currently, it is unclear whether these HLA-DQB1 alleles are causal or merely markers of association. Here, we propose several mechanisms to support the biological plausibility of an association between HLA class II alleles with FL risk. Further genetic studies will be needed that include a large number of participants to provide in-depth coverage of the entire HLA class II region to elucidate the role of HLA alleles in the pathogenesis of FL.