|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Inflammatory bowel diseases, encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are characterised by persistent leucocyte tissue infiltration leading to perpetuation of an inappropriate inflammatory cascade. The neuronal guidance molecule netrin-1 has recently been implicated in the orchestration of leucocyte trafficking during acute inflammation. We therefore hypothesised that netrin-1 could modulate leucocyte infiltration and disease activity in a model of inflammatory bowel disease.
DSS-colitis was performed in mice with partial genetic netrin-1 deficiency (Ntn-1+/− mice) or wild-type mice treated with exogenous netrin-1 via osmotic pump to examine the role of endogenous and therapeutically administered netrin-1. These studies were supported by in vitro models of transepithelial migration and intestinal epithelial barrier function.
Consistent with our hypothesis, we observed induction of netrin-1 during intestinal inflammation in vitro or in mice exposed to experimental colitis. Moreover, mice with partial netrin-1 deficiency demonstrated an exacerbated course of DSS-colitis compared to littermate controls, with enhanced weight loss and colonic shortening. Conversely, mice treated with exogenous mouse netrin-1 experienced attenuated disease severity. Importantly, permeability studies and quantitative assessment of apoptosis reveal that netrin-1 signalling events do not alter mucosal permeability or intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis. In vivo studies of leucocyte transmigration demonstrate suppression of neutrophil trafficking as a key function mediated by endogenous or exogenously administered netrin-1. Finally, genetic studies implicate the A2B adenosine receptor in netrin-1-mediated protection during DSS-colitis.
The present study identifies a previously unrecognised role for netrin-1 in attenuating experimental colitis through limitation of neutrophil trafficking.
Netrin-1 was originally identified as a diffusible factor released by neural floor plate cells in the developing spinal cord that regulates axonal outgrowth.1 Studies have expanded to peripheral organs where netrin-1 modulates cell development, migration and inflammatory end points to reduce tissue inflammation.2–10
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), encapsulating Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are heterogeneous diseases affecting the gastrointestinal tract that occur at the cross section of genetics and environment.11 12 Disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier and aberrant accumulation of leucocytes within the intestinal lamina propria (LP) leading to continued mucosal damage characterise CD and UC.13 While biologics offer more targeted treatment, the search for increased specificity in IBD therapeutics continues.14
The role of netrin-1 in IBD remains undefined. Previous reports demonstrate enhanced netrin-1 expression in the intestinal epithelium of patients with CD or UC.15 Hypoxia-dependent signalling induces intestinal mucosal netrin-1 expression,2 with recent reports demonstrating a tissue-protective role for the hypoxic response in IBD.16–19 This notion coupled with an inhibitory effect of netrin-1 on leucocyte transmigration2 6 led us to hypothesise that netrin-1 may mediate tissue protection in IBD. We established that netrin-1 expression was enhanced within the colonic mucosa during murine colitis. Deficiency of netrin-1 resulted in exacerbated murine colitis accompanied by exaggerated neutrophil infiltration into the colonic LP. This was attenuated by recombinant netrin-1. Mechanistic studies reveal that netrin-1 mediates its effects through interaction with migrating leucocytes without directly modulating intestinal epithelial barrier function or epithelial cell apoptosis. Furthermore, we demonstrate a role for the purinergic signalling pathway in netrin-1-mediated protection. Our data demonstrate, for the first time, a protective role for netrin-1 in experimental colitis.
Caco-2, T84 and HMEC-1 cells were cultured as described.20–22 Time course studies were performed with recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL) β and interferon (IFN) γ.
Netrin-1 heterozygous mice (Ntn-1+/− mice), A2B adenosine receptor-deficient (Adora2b−/−) mice, matched littermate controls or C57BL/6 mice were used in DSS (dextran sulphate sodium) studies as described.23–25 Recombinant netrin-1 was delivered with subcutaneous osmotic pumps (1 μg/mouse/day). Anti-UNC5B antibody was administered intraperitoneally (800 μg/kg/mouse).
Flow cytometric analysis of LP leucocytes with anti-mouse GR-1, SiglecF, Ly-6G, Ly-6C, CD11b, CD45, LIVE/DEAD® cell stain or isotype controls was performed as described.26
Paraffin-embedded tissues were incubated with anti-mouse netrin-1 followed by DAB (3,3-diaminobenzidine substrate) development and methyl green counterstain.
Frozen tissues were incubated with anti-PGP9.5 or anti-CGRP, followed by fluorescent detection and DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) counterstain.
Tissue immunoblotting was performed as described.2
Messenger RNA (mRNA) analysis was performed as described.2
FITC-labelled (fluorescein isothiocyanate) dextran permeability was performed as described.19
TUNEL (deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate) assay using paraffin-embedded tissues was performed as per manufacturer's instructions.
Permeability studies in Caco-2 cells treated with DSS or cytokines were performed as described.20
Polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) transmigration was performed as described.2
Statistical comparisons were made with GraphPad Prism Analysis software using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Student t test where appropriate and are expressed at mean±SEM.
Further details can be found in the supplementary material.
Previous study suggests that inflammation regulates netrin-1 expression.27 To examine the effects of inflammation on intestinal expression of netrin-1, we assessed netrin-1 mRNA levels in human intestinal epithelial cell lines (T84 and Caco-2; figure 1A,B, respectively) and a human microvascular endothelial cell line (HMEC-1; figure 1C) following 2 h and 6 h stimulation with a combination of mediators closely associated with IBD pathogenesis (cytomix; TNFα, IL-1β and IFNγ). Netrin-1 mRNA expression significantly increased in all cell lines following 6 h treatment. To examine this response and identify the cellular source of netrin-1 in vivo, netrin-1 expression was analysed in a DSS-colitis time course (figure 1D–G). Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated robust expression of netrin-1 in colonic epithelial cells and in myenteric neural units (figure 1D; arrows identify staining of relevant cells). PCR analysis of HMEC-1 cells revealed induction of netrin-1 mRNA upon inflammatory stimulation (figure 1C); however, immunohistochemistry failed to show netrin-1 expression in colonic endothelial cells during DSS. Netrin-1 expression remained specifically localised to the intestinal epithelium and the myenteric neural units of the colon throughout the DSS time course, with the appearance of increasing expression over time. mRNA (figure 1E) and western blotting (figure 1F,G) confirmed a quantifiable increase in netrin-1 expression in the whole colon (figure 1E,F) and in the mucosal lining layer (figure 1G) following 7 days of DSS. These observations indicate induction of netrin-1 expression during experimental colitis with significant expression by the epithelium.
Netrin-1-deficient mice do not survive beyond postnatal day 3 due to improper axonal development.28 Mice with partial netrin-1 deficiency (Ntn-1+/−) develop normally compared to wild-type controls (Ntn-1+/+).28 Having observed netrin-1 expression in the colon following experimental colitis, we assessed netrin-1 expression in Ntn-1+/− mice following DSS. Netrin-1 expression in Ntn-1+/− mice remained below Ntn-1+/+ at baseline and was similarly reduced following DSS (figure 2A–C). Therefore, we conclude that during DSS-colitis, endogenous netrin-1 levels are dramatically diminished in Ntn-1+/− mice.
Initial findings demonstrated netrin-1 expression in colonic myenteric neural units (figure 1D); therefore, we compared the colonic neuronal anatomy of Ntn-1+/− and Ntn-1+/+ mice at baseline and during DSS. Staining for peripheral nerve fibres (anti-PGP9.5) revealed no appreciable difference in the neuronal anatomy of the colon of Ntn-1+/− mice compared to Ntn-1+/+ prior to or during DSS-colitis (figure 2D). Additionally, no difference in pain nerve fibres was observed between groups (anti-CGRP; data not shown). We therefore conclude that mice with netrin-1 insufficiency do not demonstrate altered neuronal patterning during DSS.
Recent study indicates that mice with partial genetic deficiency of netrin-1 (Ntn-1+/−) experience an enhanced inflammatory response in models of acute inflammation,2 8 9 thus prompting our investigation of these mice in experimental colitis. Consistent with our hypothesis, we observed that Ntn-1+/− mice experienced increased disease severity compared to wild-type controls (Ntn-1+/+) as measured by weight loss, disease activity index, colonic shortening and histologic damage (figure 3A–E, respectively). Thus, we conclude that partial deficiency of netrin-1 is detrimental to the development of DSS-colitis.
Previous observations demonstrate that netrin-1 can inhibit leucocyte tissue infiltration, with studies demonstrating netrin-1 inhibition of neutrophil and monocyte recruitment in acute inflammation.2 6–9 Inappropriate neutrophil accumulation within the LP is a key feature of early and active UC.29–31 DSS-colitis is characterised by rapid neutrophil influx into the LP, closely modelling human disease.32 Rapid onset of weight loss in the Ntn-1+/− mice prompted investigation of early and late disease activity. Flow cytometric analysis of leucocytes isolated from the whole colon following 3 and 7 days of DSS revealed no significant difference in dendritic cell (CD11c+MHCIIHi), natural killer cell (NK1.1+), eosinophil (SiglecF+), macrophage (F4/80+), B cell (B220+), CD4 T cell (CD4+), CD4 T-regulatory cell (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+), CD8 T cell (CD8+) or CD8 T-suppressor cell (CD8+CD103+) frequency or number between Ntn-1+/− mice and Ntn-1+/+ controls (data not shown). However, following 3 (figure 4A,B) and 7 days (figure 4C) of DSS, a dramatic and sustained increase was observed in the frequency and number of neutrophils (Gr-1+ cells) in the LP of Ntn-1+/− mice compared with Ntn-1+/+. Specificity of the netrin-1 effect on this granulocyte population is demonstrated by the dot plot revealing no change in eosinophil frequency (SiglecF+ cells) between the two groups (figure 4A). Additionally, expression levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα (figure 4D) and IL-1β (figure 4E) were significantly enhanced in Ntn-1+/− mice following 7 days of DSS, confirming the exaggerated inflammatory response observed in these mice.
The observation that netrin-1 deficiency exacerbates DSS-colitis directed us to investigate the consequences of supplementation with netrin-1 in this model. Mice that were treated with recombinant mouse netrin-1 for 7 days (1 μg/mouse/day) experienced diminished disease severity as demonstrated by body weight loss, disease activity index, histologic damage and colonic shortening (figure 5A–D, respectively) compared with vehicle-treated controls. Reduced inflammation in these mice was indicated by decreased TNFα and IL-1β colonic expression following netrin-1 treatment (figure 5E–F). These observations indicate that treatment with exogenous netrin-1 exerts a protective effect in experimental colitis.
Epithelial barrier dysfunction is a key feature of human UC and a major component of DSS-colitis.32 The prominent influx of neutrophils into the LP of Ntn-1+/− mice compared to wild-type controls (Ntn-1+/+), particularly at early onset of DSS-colitis (day 3, figure 4B), led us to investigate netrin-1 effects on epithelial barrier function. Furthermore, netrin-1 signalling has been implicated in antiapoptotic effects on intestinal epithelial cells33; therefore, we could hypothesise that netrin-1 mediates protection during DSS by inhibiting intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis.
For this purpose, serum levels of FITC were determined following gavage with FITC-dextran (4 kDa) in Ntn-1+/− mice compared to wild-type controls after 3 days of DSS. This day was chosen as epithelial barrier dysfunction occurs at early time points post DSS32 and Ntn-1+/− mice experience significantly differential body weight loss by day 3 (figure 3A). No difference in epithelial permeability was noted between the Ntn-1+/− and wild-type water controls. DSS exposure resulted in a significant increase in serum FITC in wild-type mice compared to their water controls. Importantly, we observed no additional increase in permeability in Ntn-1+/− mice following DSS compared to wild-type counterparts (figure 6A). This indicates that loss of netrin-1 expression does not directly affect epithelial barrier function. This study was repeated in mice treated with exogenous netrin-1 (1 μg/mouse/day) at the same time point post DSS. These mice experience improved disease outcome compared to vehicle-treated controls (figure 5). Mice exposed to DSS demonstrated significant increase in serum FITC compared to water controls as previously noted32; netrin-1 treatment had no effect on barrier function as measured by serum FITC levels (figure 6B). To more specifically analyse the effect of netrin-1 on intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis, colonic sections from mice treated with vehicle or netrin-1 exposed to water or DSS for 6 days were TUNEL stained (figure 6C,D). Limited basal intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis was identified in water controls which was unaltered by netrin-1 treatment (figure 6C,D; arrows indicate apoptotic nuclei). The percentage of apoptotic colonic epithelial cells was dramatically enhanced in mice exposed to DSS, as previously noted.34 Netrin-1 treatment during DSS did not alter the percentage of apoptotic epithelial cells (figure 6C,D). Taken together, these studies indicate that the protection conveyed by endogenous or exogenous netrin-1 during experimental colitis does not primarily involve modulation of intestinal barrier function or epithelial cell apoptosis.
In vitro experiments using Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells as a model of epithelial barrier function confirmed in vivo findings. High-resistance Caco-2 monolayers were treated with DSS (4.5%; basolaterally and apically) for 6 h (figure 6E) or cytokine cocktail for 48 h (basolateral IFNγ, TNFα, IL-1β; all at 10 ng/ml; figure 6F,G). Co-incubation with netrin-1 at the basolateral membrane or at both sides of the membrane (data not shown for cytomix) had no effect on barrier function as measured by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER; figure 6E,F) or by FITC-dextran (3 kDa) flux performed at 48 h post cytomix treatment (figure 6G), supporting in vivo findings that netrin-1 does not directly modulate the intestinal epithelial barrier function.
Our previous observation of increased neutrophil (Gr-1+ cells) accumulation within the LP of netrin-1-insufficient mice (figure 4A–D) coupled with studies indicating that netrin-1 regulates leucocyte transmigration2 6 prompted investigation of the effects of exogenous netrin-1 on leucocyte migration. Transmigration of neutrophils across the epithelial barrier is a morphologic hallmark of colitis.29 35 36 Initial investigation revealed that netrin-1 suppressed chemo-attractant-induced (Formyl-Methinyl-Leucyl-Phenylalanine; fMLP) human neutrophil (PMN) transmigration across a Caco-2 intestinal epithelial barrier in a concentration-dependent manner (figure 7A), in support of previous observations 2 6 and our conclusions from initial in vivo studies (figure 4A–C). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the frequency and number of Gr-1+ neutrophils within the LP were significantly attenuated following netrin-1 treatment during DSS compared to vehicle-treated controls (figure 7B). Previous studies demonstrated that netrin-1 can limit neutrophil and monocyte recruitment during instances of acute tissue injury.6 10 Given that the anti-Gr-1 antibody recognises Ly-6G and Ly-6C antigens, with Ly-6G representing a specific neutrophil surface marker and Ly-6C acting as a marker for inflammatory monocytes/macrophages,37 we sought to dissect whether netrin-1 was limiting transmigration of both cell types to the LP during DSS-colitis. Flow cytometric analysis of leucocytes isolated from the LP of vehicle- and netrin-1-treated mice demonstrated that the frequency and number of Ly-6GHiCD11b+ neutrophils were considerably increased during DSS-colitis compared to water controls, with both parameters being significantly diminished by netrin-1 treatment (supplementary figure 1A–C). To negate neutrophilic contribution due to binding of Ly-6C to neutrophils, the frequency of monocyte populations was assessed gating on Ly-6G negative cells. The frequency and number of Ly-6C high (Ly6G−Ly-6CHiCD11b+) and Ly-6C intermediate (Ly6G−Ly-6CIntCD11b+) monocytes/macrophages were augmented during DSS but were not significantly altered by netrin-1 (supplementary figure 1D,E). Therefore, detailed flow cytometric analysis using two distinct markers for neutrophil recognition demonstrates that netrin-1 can significantly attenuate neutrophil recruitment to the LP during DSS. Our analysis reveals no distinct effect of netrin-1 on monocyte/macrophage tissue infiltration during DSS. Therefore, we conclude that netrin-1 is part of an endogenous protective pathway within the colonic epithelium that dampens DSS-colitis through preferential limitation of neutrophil tissue infiltration.
Having identified that netrin-1 mediates protection during DSS-colitis through limitation of leucocyte recruitment, we proceeded to investigate the specific netrin-1 receptor involved. Previous study has demonstrated significant levels of expression of the UNC5B (uncoordinated receptor 5B) receptor and Adora2b (A2B adenosine receptor) on leucocytes which have each been demonstrated to mediate netrin-1 protective effects in models of acute inflammation.2 6 8 10 Taking this into account, we initially performed an antibody blocking study of the UNC5B receptor using a strategy shown to be effective in reversing netrin-1-mediated protection in a model of renal ischaemia.10 Anti-UNC5B blocking antibody or control immunoglobulin (Ig) G was administered (800 μg/kg/mouse) 1 day prior to commencement of netrin-1 delivery (1 μg/mouse/day) and 2 days prior to DSS with blocking antibody or control IgG administration at 2-day intervals until day 6 post DSS (day −2, 0, 2, 4) when mice were sacrificed. Consistent with previous results (figure 5), netrin-1 significantly attenuated severity of DSS-colitis as measured by weight loss, colon shortening and histologic tissue injury (figure 8A–C, respectively). Co-administration of a UNC5B blocking antibody did not alter netrin-1-mediated protection, with mice exhibiting no differences in weight loss, colon length or histologic injury to those treated with control IgG (figure 8A–C), thus indicating that netrin-1 was not acting through UNC5B to protect in DSS.
Subsequent studies were performed with Adora2b-deficient mice (Adora2b−/−; figure 8D–F). Adora2b−/− mice treated with netrin-1 (1 μg/mouse/day with subcutaneous pump) demonstrated comparable disease activity as measured by weight loss, colon shortening or histologic injury (figure 8D–F) compared to vehicle-treated Adora2b−/− controls. Consistent with previous studies in acute inflammatory models,2 8 we observed that netrin-1-mediated protection during DSS-colitis involves adenosine receptors.
CD and UC are chronic relapsing disorders of the gastrointestinal tract which exert devastating personal and professional consequences on the approximately 1 million sufferers.14 Disease progression is relentless, with the eventual outcome being surgical intervention for up to 70% of patients.38 39 The era of the biologics has ushered in hope for improving therapeutic strategies; however, this approach is not without serious contraindications and adverse events.14 There remains an urgent need for novel therapeutics particularly to control the exaggerated inflammation within the intestine of patients with IBD. Recent studies have implicated the neuronal guidance molecule netrin-1 in mediating tissue inflammatory responses.2 6–9 Particularly, netrin-1 expression was shown to be induced under conditions of limited oxygen availability and to ameliorate hypoxia-driven inflammation.2 Based on these findings, we hypothesised that netrin-1 could represent an endogenous anti-inflammatory in the context of IBD—a condition that is also characterised by profound tissue hypoxia.19 Excitingly, our studies revealed that mice with partial netrin-1 deficiency (Ntn-1+/−) demonstrated increased disease susceptibility in a model of DSS-colitis. This was associated with a robust neutrophil infiltration into the colonic LP and a significant increase in tissue cytokine levels in the Ntn-1+/− mice compared to their wild-type controls. Conversely, supplementation with exogenous netrin-1 was associated with attenuated weight loss, improved tissue histology and diminished colonic inflammation. Moreover, mechanistic studies pointed towards a role for netrin-1 in preferentially dampening neutrophil tissue infiltration rather than improving intestinal barrier function or attenuating intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis. Studies using antibody blockade of the UNC5B receptor or gene-targeted mice for the Adora2b point towards adenosine-receptor-mediated netrin-1 protection during DSS-colitis. Together, these studies demonstrate for the first time a role of netrin-1 in the suppression of intestinal inflammation as occurs in the context of IBD.
Consistent with our observations, previous studies have demonstrated that netrin-1 is induced by inflammatory signalling pathways in intestinal epithelia via NFκB (nuclear factor κ B) signalling.27 We demonstrate that netrin-1 expression is enhanced at the protein and mRNA level during the course of DSS-colitis. Despite netrin-1 mRNA upregulation by inflammatory stimulation of HMEC-1 endothelial cells, immunohistochemical analysis of the murine colon during DSS revealed limited, if any, detectable expression of netrin-1 at the level of the endothelium. However, netrin-1 protein was robustly expressed in the intestinal epithelium where it appears to be increased during DSS exposure. This correlates with enhanced netrin-1 expression observed in the intestinal epithelia of patients with CD and UC.15 Consistent with these studies, netrin-1 induction in IBD could involve the NFκB pathway.27 However, a recent study demonstrates that HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α), a transcription factor stabilised in intestinal epithelia in murine models of IBD,19 can induce netrin-1 expression in intestinal epithelia.2 Additionally, the Ets-1 transcription factor that is upregulated during IBD40 has been shown to induce netrin-1 expression in melanocytes.41 Therefore, multiple pathways can regulate netrin-1 expression in the context of inflammation.
Immunohistochemical analysis revealed consistent expression of netrin-1 in colonic myenteric neural units during DSS. Recent studies demonstrated a role for netrin-1 in the developing enteric nervous system where enteric neural-derived crest cells produce netrin-1.42 This intriguing observation led us to analyse the enteric neuronal anatomy of netrin-1-insufficient mice during DSS-colitis. Independent analysis revealed no difference in the enteric neuronal anatomy of netrin-1-insufficient mice in comparison with their wild-type controls either at baseline or during disease course. We conclude that netrin-1 insufficiency does not alter the neuronal anatomy in adult mice prior to or during DSS.
Supporting our observations, an anti-inflammatory effect of netrin-1 has been observed in models of acute inflammation.2 6–9 Originally, netrin-1 was demonstrated to attenuate LPS-induced sepsis through inhibition of leucocyte migration.6 Studies in kidney ischaemia–reperfusion injury,7 10 hypoxia-induced inflammation,2 acute lung injury8 43 and peritonitis9 support this observation by demonstrating a tissue-protective role for netrin-1 through suppression of inflammation. Presently, a number of downstream receptor signalling pathways have been implicated in netrin-1-mediated tissue protection observed in these studies. The transmembrane receptors, deleted in colorectal cancer, uncoordinated receptor 5 (mouse UNC5A-D; human UNC5H1-4) and the A2B adenosine receptor (ADORA2B/Adora2b) represent the known netrin-1 receptors.2 6 8–10 44 45 Independent studies have demonstrated that either UNC5B or Adora2b expression on leucocytes is responsible for netrin-1 inhibition of tissue inflammation.2 6 8–10 Of additional relevance to the present study is the observation that netrin-1 receptors can mediate the apoptotic response of the intestinal epithelium.33 Enforced expression of netrin-1 in the intestinal epithelium resulted in decreased epithelial apoptosis and a modest increase in tumour formation in the presence of APC mutation.33 Furthermore, blockade of netrin-1 interaction with epithelial deleted in colorectal cancer receptor enhanced tumour cell death in a model of colorectal cancer progression.15 Intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis, along with alterations in epithelial tight junction formation, is central to the mucosal disruption observed in patients with IBD.46 47 Similarly, epithelial cell apoptosis and tight junction breakdown are key features of DSS-colitis, while inhibition of apoptosis in this model is barrier protective.34 48 Therefore, it is conceivable that antiapoptotic effects of netrin-1 signalling may be central to its beneficial effects during experimental colitis. In vitro studies of cytokine-induced tight junction rearrangement reveal no effect of netrin-1 on this aspect of epithelial permeability.49 Importantly, in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that netrin-1 does not influence DSS-induced epithelial barrier disruption and does not have a direct impact on intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis.
In addition to epithelial barrier breakdown, early and persistent infiltration of neutrophils into the LP forming crypt abscesses is a key feature of human disease and murine colitis.29–32 36 The full extent of the role that neutrophils play during DSS-colitis remains controversial. Studies using direct depletion of neutrophils with anti-Gr1 prior to DSS reveal modest effects of neutrophil depletion on early disease activity but no significant effect on disease outcome.50 51 However, the authors propose that macrophages are key regulators of DSS-colitis that mediate protective effects through limitation of neutrophil infiltration.50 Interestingly, one study identified neutrophil depletion leading to worsening disease during DSS-colitis.52 Conversely, therapeutic targeting of neutrophil recruitment to the colon in models of colitis using blockade of the neutrophil chemokine receptor (CXCR2) or ligand (CXCL5) results in diminished neutrophil recruitment during DSS and amelioration of disease.53–55 Taken together, these studies suggest that while complete blockade of neutrophil recruitment during colitis might not be desirable, limitation of the neutrophil influx into the LP would act to control disease severity. Present in crypt abscesses during human disease are other leucocyte populations including monocytes/macrophages and lymphocytes. Therapeutic strategies in human disease and mouse models to deplete granulocytic and monocytic tissue infiltration have met with some success.56 57 Therefore, treatment to attenuate tissue infiltration of granulocytes and monocytes may be of therapeutic benefit. In support of these studies, we demonstrate that netrin-1 directly limits trafficking of neutrophils in vitro and in vivo to ameliorate outcome in DSS-colitis. Further dissection of netrin-1 effects on leucocyte recruitment during DSS-colitis indicates that netrin-1 has no discernible effect on monocyte/macrophage recruitment to the colonic LP. Therefore, this study presents the preferential limitation of neutrophil recruitment by netrin-1 during DSS as a novel therapeutic strategy in an acute model of colitis.
Present findings place netrin-1 as an endogenous protective mediator in experimental colitis. Interestingly, supplementation with netrin-1 in DSS-colitis where its expression is induced is therapeutically effective. A similar phenomenon is observed in two independent studies where stabilisation of the locally produced HIF-1α transcription factor during experimental colitis is of therapeutic benefit.16 18 These studies support the potential benefit of enhancing in vivo protective responses for therapeutic intervention.
As previously mentioned, netrin-1 has an array of receptors through which it mediates tissue-protective effects. We focused our studies on receptors that have been implicated in mediating netrin-1-driven inhibition of leucocyte recruitment in models of acute inflammation, the UNC5B and the Adora2b. Lack of functional Adora2b abrogated the protective effect of netrin-1 on DSS-colitis. These studies implicate this purinergic signalling pathway in netrin-1-mediated protection in experimental colitis.
Consideration of netrin-1 as a therapeutic strategy in IBD must take into account the breadth of literature demonstrating the anti-inflammatory component as well as the antiapoptotic role of netrin-1 signalling. Studies indicating the involvement of netrin-1 in malignant transformation in the intestine,15 coupled with our observation that netrin-1 significantly attenuates intestinal leucocyte infiltration in experimental colitis, point to a tailored therapeutic strategy with netrin-1 administration perhaps being more suited to treat periods of disease flare rather than a maintenance treatment.
In summary, our present studies demonstrate for the first time that netrin-1 expression is an endogenous tissue-protective mechanism in experimental colitis. Therapeutic studies indicate that targeting netrin-1 may be useful in treatment of aberrant intestinal leucocyte accumulation, as occurs in colitis.
The authors would like to thank Marc Tessier-Lavigne for providing the Ntn-1 mice for this project. Thank you to Sean P. Colgan, Almut Grenz, Eric T. Clambey, Eoin N. McNamee, Kelley Brodsky, Julee Dalton, Timothy Lubbert and Douglas Ridyard for technical assistance as well as manuscript discussion.
Funding: The present manuscript is supported by United States National Institutes of Health grant R01-HL0921, R01-DK083385 and R01HL098294 to HKE, and Crohn's and Colitis Foundation Senior Research Award to HKE. Supported by Crohn's and Colitis Foundation Fellowship to CMA, CBC and JCM. Supported in part by the Histology and Imaging Core of NIDCD Grant P30 DC04657 to D. Restrepo and T. Finger.
Competing interests: None.
Contributors: All authors contributed to data generation, data analysis and interpretation as well as writing of the manuscript.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.