PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Virol Methods. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 1, 2013.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3322263
NIHMSID: NIHMS360236
Detection of Circulating Platelet-Monocyte Complexes in persons infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1
Meera V. Singh,1 Donna C. Davidson,1 Michelle Kiebala,1 and Sanjay B. Maggirwar1*
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
meera_singh/at/urmc.rochester.edu
donna_davidson/at/urmc.rochester.edu
michelle_kiebala/at/urmc.rochester.edu
*Corresponding author at: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 672; Rochester, NY 14642. Tel: (001) 585-273-2276; Fax: (001) 585-473-9573; sanjay_maggirwar/at/urmc.rochester.edu
Activated platelets form transient aggregates with monocytes in circulation and have a half-life of approximately 30–60 minutes. These complexes are increased in various inflammatory conditions and are an early marker of myocardial infarction. HIV-1 infection is associated with chronic inflammation, and increased CD16+ inflammatory monocytes have been observed in these individuals, probably as a result of increased interaction with platelets. However, narrow detection period and platelet activation during sample processing pose significant problems in detecting platelet-monocyte complexes (PMCs). A method was standardized addressing these difficulties, to enumerate PMCs involving CD16+ or CD16 monocytes in whole blood using flow cytometry. Blood collected from healthy individuals was treated with either collagen (for platelet activation) or LPS (for monocyte activation) and subsequently used to study effect of these treatments on PMC formation. This method was also validated for the ex vivo quantitation of PMCs in blood obtained from persons infected with HIV. The in vitro results demonstrated that platelet activation, but not monocyte activation, resulted in significant increase in PMC formation. There was a significant increase in CD16+ PMCs and platelet activation, in samples obtained from persons infected with HIV as compared to those without HIV infection. Furthermore, PMC percentages correlated positively with platelet activation. These findings improve the ability to detect PMCs and shed light on HIV pathogenesis.
Platelets, small anucleated cells, are a lead player in thrombosis, and are critical not only in preventing excessive loss of blood, but also in the recruitment of inflammatory cells such as monocytes and neutrophils to the site of injury. Under normal physiologic conditions, platelets reside in an inactive form; however they are quickly and easily activated at sites of vascular damage. Platelets can also become activated in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines or infective agents (Semple and Freedman, 2010) as well as by shear force (Kroll et al., 1996). Platelet activation by all of these stimuli, even in the absence of any detectable vessel damage, has opened up a new prospect in platelet function, i.e. inflammation and immune regulation. Just as the capacity of activated platelets to form aggregates with other platelets is crucial for their thrombogenic function, their pro-inflammatory activity is mediated through interactions with other leukocytes in circulation, and the subsequent release of cytokines and chemokines thus facilitates inflammation (Freedman and Loscalzo, 2002). Interestingly, monocytes have a competitive advantage over other leukocytes in forming complexes with platelets, and these circulating platelet monocyte complexes (PMCs) are considered a more sensitive marker of platelet activation than P-selectin expression (Michelson et al., 2001). Increased PMCs have been demonstrated in Alzheimer's disease (Sevush et al., 1998), myeloprolifierative disorders (Villmow et al., 2002), autoimmune disorders (Joseph et al., 2001), and in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors (Gkaliagkousi et al., 2009). However, these complexes are known to have a very short half-life in vivo. Intravenous injection of activated platelets led to sequestration of leukocytes in apoE−/− mice within 5 minutes, an effect that lasted up to 180 minutes in the case of monocytes (Rinder et al., 1991). Accordingly, another study in baboons revealed similar results where these complexes were undetectable at 2 hours after injection of activated platelets (Michelson et al., 2001).
The interaction between platelets and monocytes is predominantly facilitated through binding of P-selectin on platelets with P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) on monocytes, and is considered to be dependent on divalent cations (Bournazos et al., 2008; Fernandes et al., 2003). It has also been demonstrated that the cross-talk with activated platelets induces monocytes to mature into a more pro-inflammatory subtype (Bouchon et al., 2000; Weyrich et al., 1996; Weyrich et al., 1995). Hence, enumeration of these complexes in whole blood might be indicative of the immune-inflammatory status in diseases associated with chronic inflammation, for example, in the context of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 (HIV-1; henceforth referred to as HIV) infection.
Flow cytometry is the most widely used method of PMC detection, where PMCs are defined as the monocytes expressing platelet markers. However, detection of these complexes is not very straightforward due, in part, to the fact that platelets can undergo spontaneous activation during sample processing and once activated, they can immediately form complexes with surrounding monocytes. These aggregates, formed as byproducts of the experimental procedure, can dilute the detection of already existing complexes. Even though many groups have reported the association of these complexes with various diseases using flow cytometry, not many have considered these difficulties while processing the samples (Gkaliagkousi et al., 2009; Joseph et al., 2001; Ogura et al., 2001; Passacquale et al., 2011; Sevush et al., 1998). Therefore, it was proposed to modify the current, reported methods in order to eliminate complexes that cab be induces experimentally, while preserving the resident PMCs. The method was also verified for its efficacy to quantitate PMCs in vitro, by studying the effect of platelet and monocyte activating agents on the interaction of these two cell types in cell culture, and ex vivo, in blood collected from persons with or without HIV infection. The results demonstrate that by fixing the blood prior to staining, it is possible to preserve the PMCs efficiently, while limiting consequential platelet activation. Thus, this method is well suited for use in detecting these inflammatory complexes for a broad range of applications.
2.1. Reagents and antibodies
Anti-CD14 PE, anti-CD16 PE Cy7, anti-CD62P FITC antibodies and compensation beads were purchased from BD Biosciences, CA, USA. Anti-CD61 AF 647 and collagen were purchased from AbD Serotec, USA and Chronolog, PA, USA respectively. Paraformaldehyde (PFA) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA. ACK RBC lysis buffer was purchased from Invitrogen, CA, USA.
2.2. Study patients
Persons with (N=8) and without (N=9) HIV infection (without any occurrence of cardiovascular disease at least one preceding year) were enrolled in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients according to University of Rochester Research Subjects Review Board guidelines. Blood samples were drawn in ACD (acid citrate dextrose) buffered vacutainers (BD Biosciences, CA, USA). All persons with HIV infection were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the time of the draw.
2.3. Staining method for identification of PMCs
100 μl blood was processed in any of the following four ways: stain-lyse-wash-fix (SLWF), stain-fix-lyse-wash (SFLW), fix-lyse-wash-stain (FLWS), or fix-wash-lyse-wash-stain (FWLWS) in an effort to optimize the staining procedure for detection of PMCs using flow cytometry. FWLWS was selected as the staining method of interest and all subsequent samples were processed using that method. Briefly, 100 μl blood was fixed with 4% PFA for 15 minutes in the dark at room temperature. After fixing, the blood sample was washed twice with 1 ml staining buffer (1× PBS containing 2% BSA) by centrifugation at 0.4 × g for 5 minutes. Red blood cells (RBCs) were then lysed using ACK lysis buffer for 5 minutes at room temperature in the dark, and the remaining cells were washed twice as above. Cells were re-suspended in 100 μl staining buffer and stained with various antibodies, 10 μl CD14, 3 μl CD16, 10 μl CD62P and 3 μl CD61, for 25 minutes in the dark at room temperature. The samples were then washed twice, re-suspended in 250 μl staining buffer and were acquired on the flow cytometer (Accuri C6). Unstained cells and cells stained with only CD14 and CD16 were used as controls. 50,000 events per tube were acquired in the “Leukocyte” gate at the same instrument settings for quantitation of PMCs. The same tubes were also acquired with 10,000 events in the “Cells” gate to measure platelet percentages and activation in terms of CD62P expression.
2.4. Gating strategy used for quantitation of PMCs
For each sample, unstained cells were used to define the “Leukocyte” gate on a forward and side scatter chart (FSC/SSC). Cells in the leukocyte gate were used to formulate the next chart and subsequently, the monocytes were gated based on their FSC/SSC characteristics. These two gates were then applied to the cells stained with antibodies against CD14 and CD16 only. These cells were used to differentiate between two monocyte subtypes, CD14+CD16 and CD14+CD16+, henceforth referred to as CD16 and CD16+ monocytes. Furthermore, the same cells were used to define the gate for detecting PMCs, i.e. monocytes expressing CD61, and were labeled as CD16CD61+ and CD16+CD61+. Each of these gates was then applied to the cells stained with all four antibodies to calculate percentages of CD16 and CD16+ PMCs in the total monocyte population.
2.5. Quantitation of platelet percentages and activation
Unstained cells were used to define the gate comprised of platelets and leukocytes on a FSC/SSC plot (labeled as “Cells” gate). Sizing beads (Mega Mix, Biocytex, Marseille, France) were also used to define the “platelets” gate (0.9–3 μm) and to eliminate debris as well as microparticles. The cells stained with CD14 and CD16 antibodies alone were then used to define the CD61+ and CD62P+ gates, and these gates were then applied to the cells stained with anti-CD61 and anti-CD62P to calculate the percentage of CD62P+ platelets and CD62P expression as Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI).
2.6. Quantitation of PMCs after in vitro platelet and monocyte activation and in persons with and without HIV infection
For the in vitro treatments, 100 μl blood per tube was treated with either 2 μg/ml collagen or 10 ng/ml LPS, or alternatively was left untreated and was incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 45 minutes (N=4). After the treatment, blood was fixed, stained, and acquired as detailed above. Blood samples obtained from persons with (N=8) or without (N=9) HIV infection were processed as above for enumeration of PMCs.
2.7. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) ELISA
Monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) derived from a healthy donor using a MACS CD14+ monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotech Inc., CA, USA). Monocytes (0.5 × 106) were treated in triplicate with 10 ng/ml of LPS or left untreated. After 8 hours, 100 μl supernatant was collected and used to measure TNFα levels using a TNFα ELISA kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA; sensitivity >1.7 pg/ml).
2.8. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism 4.0 software. Comparison between PMC percentages, CD62P MFI, and percent CD62P+ platelets in LPS or collagen treated samples, as well as comparison between the same populations in samples obtained from persons with or without HIV infection was done by Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation between percent CD16+CD61+ monocytes and CD62P MFI was analyzed by the Spearman correlation test.
3.1. Improved staining method for detection of PMCs in whole blood
A routine method of whole blood sample preparation for analysis by flow cytometry involves staining with fluorochrome-tagged antibodies of interest, followed by RBC lysis, washing, and finally fixation, which is optional (stain-lyse-wash-fix; SLWF; Fig. 1A). However, this method could not be used to detect PMCs because, first, these complexes have a short half-life and would likely be disrupted during sample processing and, second, the staining method and centrifugation steps have the potential to activate platelets and may result in de novo formation of complexes. In order to overcome these difficulties, fixing the samples as early as possible during sample processing is essential. Consequently, three combinations of the different steps involved in the staining procedure were tested as explained previously, i.e. stain, lyse, wash and fix. Of these, the stain-fix-wash-lyse (SFLW) combination resulted in incomplete RBC lysis and indistinct cluster formation on FSC/SSC plots, as well as non-specific staining (Fig. 1B). Additions of fixative in the presence of excess unbound antibodies likely led to non-specific staining and hence, the fix-lyse-wash-stain (FLWS) method was tested next. Although non-specific staining was reduced when following this method, it still caused incomplete RBC lysis and indistinct cluster formation (Fig. 1C), which led to difficulties in gating the leukocyte and monocyte clusters when performing analysis. Prolonged exposure of cells to PFA throughout the staining protocol seemed to be the underlying cause of these problems and therefore, an additional wash step was introduced following fixation in an effort to remove the fixative (fix-wash-lyse-wash-stain; FWLWS; Fig. 1D). Addition of the extra wash step resulted in complete RBC lysis and well-defined cell clusters and thus, all data showed henceforth was obtained using this method. The gating strategy used to calculate PMC percentages and platelet activation, in terms of CD62P expression, is shown in Figures 2 and and3,3, and described in detail in sections 2.4 and 2.5 respectively.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison between staining methods for detection of platelet-monocyte complexes in whole blood using flow cytometry
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progressive gating strategy to quantitate platelet-monocyte complexes in whole blood
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow cytometric analysis of platelet percentages and activation
3.2. Increase in PMC formation following platelet activation
Whole blood obtained from healthy HIV negative donors was treated with either LPS, to activate monocytes, or with collagen, to activate platelets, and subsequently used to enumerate PMCs. Secretion of TNFα by monocytes was measured as a marker of monocyte activation, and LPS treated monocytes showed increased levels of TNFα as compared to non-treated monocytes (p=0.002; Fig. 4A). Additionally, there was a significant increase in platelet activation as indicated by an increase in MFI of CD62P expression (Fig. 4B) and by the percentage of CD62P+ platelets (Fig. 4C) in whole blood treated with collagen as compared to non-treated (p=0.0082) or LPS treated (p=0.0095) blood. Blood samples treated with collagen also displayed higher levels of PMCs in CD16+ (Fig. 4D) and CD16 (Fig. 4E) monocytes as compared to non-treated and LPS treated samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Assessment of PMC formation upon in vitro treatments to activate platelets and monocytes in whole blood
3.3. Increased levels of CD16+ PMCs in samples obtained from persons with HIV infection correlated positively with activated platelet numbers
As compared to samples obtained from persons without HIV infection, samples obtained from persons with HIV infection contained significantly increased percentages of CD16+CD61+ monocytes (CD16+ PMCs; p=0.0079; Fig. 5A). While the CD16CD61+ monocyte percentages were also higher as compared to persons without HIV infection, these were not statistically significant (Fig. 5B). Platelets within the samples obtained from persons with HIV infection expressed more CD62P (p=0.029; Fig. 5C) as compared to those without HIV infection, indicating increased activation and CD62P values correlated positively with CD16+ PMC percentages (p < 0.05; Fig. 5D).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Enumeration of PMCs in samples obtained from persons with or without HIV infection
Chronic immune activation associated with increased inflammation is one of the hallmarks of HIV infection and is observed even in the acute phase of disease progression. Monocytes contribute substantially toward HIV pathogenesis, both by secreting various pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines upon activation and by acting as a reservoir of latent HIV infection (Fischer-Smith et al., 2001; Williams and Hickey, 2002). Monocytes can be activated upon encounter with bacterial endotoxins, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and other cells of the immune system, and also upon interaction with activated platelets. Previous studies from our laboratory, and from those of others have shown that despite ongoing thrombocytopenia, an increased number of activated platelets, as well as markers of platelet activation such as soluble CD40L (sCD40L) (Davidson et al., 2011) and platelet activating factor (PAF) (Gelbard et al., 1994), are found in persons with HIV infection. sCD40L increases the permeability of the blood brain barrier to virus thereby potentially allowing more monocytes to enter the central nervous system (CNS; Davidson et al, unpublished data). On a related subject, a study by Ragin et al, on older patients from the MACS cohort (an advanced HIV infection cohort), has shown that platelet decline was found to be associated with reduced gray matter volume and increased risk of dementia (Ragin et al., 2011). In addition to this, there is growing evidence that the cross-talk between monocytes and activated platelets promotes the activation and modulation of monocyte behavior, and that these interactions at sites of injury and infection may function to further promote the inflammatory response [(Bournazos et al., 2008) and reviewed by Stephen et al (Stephen and Dransfield, 2010)]. Hence, it is plausible that in persons infected with HIV, monocyte activation via platelet-monocyte cross-talk could result in enhanced migration of CD16+ monocytes across the blood brain barrier and not only spread the virus to the CNS compartment (if they are latently infected), but also exacerbate the CNS associated inflammatory disorders in these patients. Indeed, studies have shown that there are increased CD16+ CD163+ cells in the CNS of individuals with HIVE (HIV-associated encephalitis) [(Fischer-Smith et al., 2001) and reviewed in (Fischer-Smith et al., 2008)]. Due to the complex interplay between platelets and monocytes, both alone and together, during immune pathogenesis of HIV infection, it is essential to devise a better methodology to detect PMCs. With this goal in mind, a method to quantitate PMCs in whole blood was standardized and was subsequently employed to assess the percentages of circulating PMCs in blood collected from persons infected with HIV.
Although several previous reports have enumerated PMCs using flow cytometry in regard to various disease conditions, the methodologies used thus far have failed to consider spontaneous platelet activation and the resulting consequence on de novo PMC formation (Gkaliagkousi et al., 2009; Joseph et al., 2001; Ogura et al., 2001; Passacquale et al., 2011; Sevush et al., 1998). Thus, in the efforts to formulate an optimized method for detection of PMCs, fixing the blood samples immediately following collection was given prime importance, as it helped to conserve PMCs and avoid experimental artifacts. Demonstrated herein, is a fix-wash-lyse-wash-stain method to fluorescently label blood samples, which when used along with a progressive gating strategy and FMO (fluorescence minus one) controls, allows for efficient enumeration of PMCs. The additional wash step performed after sample fixation was necessary to avoid the toxicity caused by excessive exposure to PFA.
One significant concern in adopting this method was that the fixing of samples prior to staining might alter the antibody binding capacity to some extent; however this was deemed a reasonable trade-off given the advantages of this method as outlined above. Nonetheless, in vitro whole blood treatments with LPS and collagen were performed, to serve as monocyte and platelet activating reagents, respectively, in order to ensure that it is possible to capture the changes in PMC percentages induced by these treatments using the method of detection described here. Results indicated that platelet-monocyte interaction increased significantly upon platelet activation as compared to monocyte activation. These results corroborate an earlier report by Rinder et al. who showed that platelet-leukocyte complexes increased upon platelet activation and that this interaction was dependent on monocyte activation only to a very limited extent (Rinder et al., 1991).
Upon validation of the procedure, persons with or without HIV infection (without any incidence of cardiovascular disease at least one year prior to enrollment in the study) were enrolled to assess whether HIV infection had any effect on platelet-monocyte interactions. All of the individuals enrolled in the study were on ART and had low viral load with CD4+ T cell count above 500 cells/mm3 (data not shown). The results show that despite the viral suppression induced by successful ART, the number of circulating PMCs was significantly higher in the inflammatory monocyte subset (i.e. CD16+ monocytes) of these individuals as compared to healthy individuals without HIV infection, and correlated positively with the extent of platelet activation. The PMC percentages in the classical CD16 monocyte subset were also higher in samples obtained from persons infected with HIV, although the effects were not statistically different from controls. Consistently, our data (not shown) and previous reports (Pulliam et al., 1997; Thieblemont et al., 1995) demonstrate a significant increase in CD16+ monocyte percentages in samples obtained from persons infected with HIV.
This study defines a flow cytometric method to quantify PMCs in clinical specimens. The findings suggest that persons infected with HIV have increased levels of platelet-monocyte complexes, particularly within the inflammatory monocyte population despite successful ART. Furthermore, this data suggests that either platelets have an increased preference to associate with CD16+ monocytes, or that alternatively, the platelet-monocyte cross-talk causes maturation of classical monocytes to the CD16+ phenotype; thus warranting further investigation into whether this interaction enhances the monocyte capacity to cross the blood brain barrier, as well as the role of these monocytes in HIV associated neuro-cognitive impairment.
Highlights
  • Optimum method to quantify PMCs in whole blood using flow cytometry
  • A method to preserve PMCs while preventing experimental artifacts during processing
  • Platelet activation, not monocyte activation leads to increase in PMC formation.
  • In HIV infected individuals CD16+ PMCs are increased compared to healthy controls.
  • CD16+ PMCs are positively correlated to platelet activation in these individuals.
Acknowledgement
We thank the University of Rochester Flow Cytometry Core, especially Dr. Wojciech Wojciechowski and Mr. Matt Cochran for their technical support. We also thank the University of Rochester Infectious Disease unit and Rochester Victory alliance, specifically; Carol Greisberger, Catherine Bunce, Emily Cosimano, Mary Adams and Chris Foote for their help in recruiting study subjects. We are also thankful to Julie Sahler for her helpful comments about this work. This publication was supported in part by the University of Rochester Developmental Center for AIDS Research (NIH P30AI078498). This work was also supported by National Institute of Health grants RO1 NS054578 and RO1 NS066801.
Abbreviations
PMCsplatelet-monocyte complexes
HIV-1Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1
PSGL-1P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1
PFAparaformaldehyde
LPSLippopolysaccharide
ACDacid citrate dextrose
ARTanti retroviral therapy
SLWFstain lyse wash fix
SFLWstain fix lyse wash
FLWSfix lyse wash stain
FWLWSfix wash lyse wash stain
MFImedian fluorescence intensity
TNFαtumor necrosis factor alpha
RBCsred blood cells
CNScentral nervous system
sCD40Lsoluble CD40 ligand
PAFplatelet activating factor
PBMCsperipheral blood mononuclear cells

Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
  • Bouchon A, Dietrich J, Colonna M. Cutting edge: inflammatory responses can be triggered by TREM-1, a novel receptor expressed on neutrophils and monocytes. J Immunol. 2000;164:4991–4995. [PubMed]
  • Bournazos S, Rennie J, Hart SP, Fox KA, Dransfield I. Monocyte functional responsiveness after PSGL-1-mediated platelet adhesion is dependent on platelet activation status. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:1491–1498. [PubMed]
  • Davidson DC, Hirschman MP, Spinelli SL, Morrell CN, Schifitto G, Phipps RP, Maggirwar SB. Antiplatelet activity of valproic acid contributes to decreased soluble CD40 ligand production in HIV type 1-infected individuals. J Immunol. 2011;186:584–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fernandes LS, Conde ID, Wayne Smith C, Kansas GS, Snapp KR, Bennet N, Ballantyne C, McIntire LV, O'Brian Smith E, Klem JA, Mathew S, Frangogiannis N, Turner NA, Maresh KJ, Kleiman NS. Platelet-monocyte complex formation: effect of blocking PSGL-1 alone, and in combination with alphaIIbbeta3 and alphaMbeta2, in coronary stenting. Thromb Res. 2003;111:171–177. [PubMed]
  • Fischer-Smith T, Bell C, Croul S, Lewis M, Rappaport J. Monocyte/macrophage trafficking in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome encephalitis: lessons from human and nonhuman primate studies. J Neurovirol. 2008;14:318–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fischer-Smith T, Croul S, Sverstiuk AE, Capini C, L'Heureux D, Regulier EG, Richardson MW, Amini S, Morgello S, Khalili K, Rappaport J. CNS invasion by CD14+/CD16+ peripheral blood-derived monocytes in HIV dementia: perivascular accumulation and reservoir of HIV infection. J Neurovirol. 2001;7:528–541. [PubMed]
  • Freedman JE, Loscalzo J. Platelet-monocyte aggregates: bridging thrombosis and inflammation. Circulation. 2002;105:2130–2132. [PubMed]
  • Gelbard HA, Nottet HS, Swindells S, Jett M, Dzenko KA, Genis P, White R, Wang L, Choi YB, Zhang D, et al. Platelet-activating factor: a candidate human immunodeficiency virus type 1-induced neurotoxin. J Virol. 1994;68:4628–4635. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gkaliagkousi E, Corrigall V, Becker S, de Winter P, Shah A, Zamboulis C, Ritter J, Ferro A. Decreased platelet nitric oxide contributes to increased circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates in hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:3048–3054. [PubMed]
  • Joseph JE, Harrison P, Mackie IJ, Isenberg DA, Machin SJ. Increased circulating platelet-leucocyte complexes and platelet activation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Haematol. 2001;115:451–459. [PubMed]
  • Kroll MH, Hellums JD, McIntire LV, Schafer AI, Moake JL. Platelets and shear stress. Blood. 1996;88:1525–1541. [PubMed]
  • Michelson AD, Barnard MR, Krueger LA, Valeri CR, Furman MI. Circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates are a more sensitive marker of in vivo platelet activation than platelet surface P-selectin: studies in baboons, human coronary intervention, and human acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001;104:1533–1537. [PubMed]
  • Ogura H, Kawasaki T, Tanaka H, Koh T, Tanaka R, Ozeki Y, Hosotsubo H, Kuwagata Y, Shimazu T, Sugimoto H. Activated platelets enhance microparticle formation and platelet-leukocyte interaction in severe trauma and sepsis. J Trauma. 2001;50:801–809. [PubMed]
  • Passacquale G, Vamadevan P, Pereira L, Hamid C, Corrigall V, Ferro A. Monocyte-platelet interaction induces a pro-inflammatory phenotype in circulating monocytes. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25595. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pulliam L, Gascon R, Stubblebine M, McGuire D, McGrath MS. Unique monocyte subset in patients with AIDS dementia. Lancet. 1997;349:692–695. [PubMed]
  • Ragin AB, D'Souza G, Reynolds S, Miller E, Sacktor N, Selnes OA, Martin E, Visscher BR, Becker JT. Platelet decline as a predictor of brain injury in HIV infection. J Neurovirol. 2011;17:487–495. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rinder HM, Bonan JL, Rinder CS, Ault KA, Smith BR. Dynamics of leukocyte-platelet adhesion in whole blood. Blood. 1991;78:1730–1737. [PubMed]
  • Semple JW, Freedman J. Platelets and innate immunity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:499–511. [PubMed]
  • Sevush S, Jy W, Horstman LL, Mao WW, Kolodny L, Ahn YS. Platelet activation in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:530–536. [PubMed]
  • Stephen J, Dransfield I. The Pathophysiological relevence of monocyte-platelet interaction in inflammatory disease. J Exp Clin Med. 2010;2:262–268.
  • Thieblemont N, Weiss L, Sadeghi HM, Estcourt C, Haeffner-Cavaillon N. CD14lowCD16high: a cytokine-producing monocyte subset which expands during human immunodeficiency virus infection. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:3418–3424. [PubMed]
  • Villmow T, Kemkes-Matthes B, Matzdorff AC. Markers of platelet activation and platelet-leukocyte interaction in patients with myeloproliferative syndromes. Thromb Res. 2002;108:139–145. [PubMed]
  • Weyrich AS, Elstad MR, McEver RP, McIntyre TM, Moore KL, Morrissey JH, Prescott SM, Zimmerman GA. Activated platelets signal chemokine synthesis by human monocytes. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1525–1534. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Weyrich AS, McIntyre TM, McEver RP, Prescott SM, Zimmerman GA. Monocyte tethering by P-selectin regulates monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion. Signal integration and NF-kappa B translocation. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2297–2303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Williams KC, Hickey WF. Central nervous system damage, monocytes and macrophages, and neurological disorders in AIDS. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002;25:537–562. [PubMed]