Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Cyst Fibros. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 March 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3320219


To address the risk of undernutrition in patients with CF, patients are encouraged to achieve dietary intakes of 120–150% of the daily recommended intake (DRI) of calories for individuals without CF and 40% of those calories from fat (1). Despite these treatment recommendations, a significant number of patients with CF remain underweight and adherence rates to the calorie intake recommendations range from 12–16% (2). Therefore, optimizing nutritional management and developing effective strategies to improve dietary adherence are critical for promoting growth, quality of life, and long-term survival in patients with CF (1, 3).

While achieving adequate nutrition is a central element of optimal CF care (1), Modi and Quittner (4) found that both children and parents lacked knowledge about nutrition, including the importance of offering snacks, taking enzymes before a meal or snack, and boosting calories. Even when families have knowledge of the recommended care practices for a chronic illness there are often barriers to following recommendations that negatively impact illness management and family functioning (5, 6). A common barrier to nutrition adherence in CF, particularly in early childhood, is the occurrence of challenging mealtime behavior. Many of these mealtime behaviors are developmentally-appropriate, yet warrant targeted intervention because increased behavior problems at mealtime are associated with lower caloric intake (7) and decreased child weight status (8). These problematic behaviors have also been found to impact family functioning at mealtimes in families of children with CF (5, 6, 8).

To address these mealtime behaviors the CF Foundation recommends a behavioral approach be integrated into standard nutrition care, when possible, for children with CF as early as post-positive newborn screen (1, 9, 10). This recommendation is based on findings from a series of studies by Stark, Powers, and colleagues that documented increased adherence to calorie recommendations (1113) and improved growth (12, 13) using the combined behavior-nutrition approach.

The Powers et al. (11) study was the first to demonstrate that dietary adherence and growth could be improved in children as young as toddlers with CF using an eight-week behavior-nutrition (BN) intervention. The treatment emphasized nutrition counseling to increase energy intake (i.e., recommending types of foods and use of addables/spreadables) and child behavioral management training (i.e., including differential attention and contingency management skills). Longitudinal outcomes for the cohort reflected increases in weight-for-age z-scores and energy intake for the majority of children from posttreatment to the two-year time point. However, at the four-year time point, energy intake and weight for age z-scores declined for over half of the children (14). Notably, the decline in nutritional and growth outcomes between follow-up years two and four was simultaneous with the children entering school.

Previous literature has described the mealtime behavior challenges present in toddlerhood and school-age cohorts separately, however research has yet to specifically examine the challenges families face as they transition from toddlerhood to school-age. The Powers et al. (14) data suggest that this is a crucial time in child development to identify factors that affect optimal growth. The aims of the current study were to: 1) better understand how families used the strategies taught in a behavior-nutrition intervention and 2) identify the challenges with CF management families experienced during this developmental transition, particularly nutrition. Qualitative analysis is an optimal methodology to achieve these aims (15).



Eight parents of children with CF participated in a semi-structured interview approximately five years following completion of the Powers et al. (11) clinical trial. One family in the original trial was lost to follow-up and did not participate in the interview. The mean age at posttreatment in the trial was 2.8 years (SD=0.5) and mean age of the children at the time of the interview was 8.2 years (SD=0.8). Five of the eight children were male. See Table 1 for disease-related data. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the medical center, and written informed consent was obtained from parents prior to participating in any study procedures.

Table 1
Growth and Disease-Related Variables From CF Clinic Visit Closest to Time of Interview

Semi-structured interview

Stem questions (Table 2) were developed a priori by study authors and were driven by the study aims. The purpose of the semi-structured interview was to systematically collect information from parents by asking uniform stem questions, while offering the flexibility for parents to provide additional relevant information and allow the interviewer to ask clarifying questions. The interview was conducted by the first author who was familiar with all families from previous research interactions. Seven of the interviews were conducted over the phone, and one interview was conducted face-to-face while the child was admitted to the CF inpatient unit. The average length of the interviews was 24 minutes (SD =8.8). Parents received $20 in compensation for their participation.

Table 2
Parent Interview Stem Questions

Data analysis

Interviews were audiotaped using a USBBLAST™ recording device and were given an identification number to anonymize content. The interview and thematic analysis was informed by Grounded Theory (16) and interview content was coded using the approach specifically described by Braun and Clarke (15). Thematic analysis is a method for identifying, analyzing and reporting patterns within data that is rigorous, systematic and iterative. The process includes becoming familiar with the data set through repeated reviewing of the transcript data, generating initial codes (i.e., data extracts of the interview determined to be meaningful), searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and refining themes, and describing findings (15).

The thematic analysis started with the process of verbatim transcription of the collected interview data as well as field notes for two interviews that had audio quality concerns. Each transcript was reviewed independently by three trained coders (a postdoctoral research fellow, a registered dietitian, and a bachelors-level research assistant) and a line-by-line content analysis was used to identify major themes and memorable quotes. Regular analysis meetings were held to discuss the identification of extracted key codes from the interviews as well as identified themes. When discrepancies occurred, the coders clarified the meaning of emerging themes by reviewing transcripts for contextual supporting information to inform a consensus interpretation of the text. The consensus themes were then compared to themes identified by a fourth and independent reliability coder. When the reliability coder identified a theme beyond those identified by consensus, the group would review the theme and its contextual information to determine if the theme would be incorporated or excluded.

Themes were defined as specific content that was mentioned more than three times throughout each interview or specifically identified as a core issue in relation to the overall content of the interview. Memorable quotes from interviews were extracted to support theme identification. Identified themes served as the structure of the thematic framework for each interview. Next, a higher-order framework was created for the entire data set by pooling and systematically arranging all individual themes. A small number of themes were dropped from the final analysis due to insufficient content overlap and power to stand alone as a separate theme, and reflected sufficient data collection to achieve saturation. The iterative process produced a final thematic representation of parent responses.


Themes identified from the parent interviews were categorized into four main domains: a) parent recall of strategies from the BN intervention, b) ongoing challenges impacting CF care, c) new challenges impacting CF care, and d) protective factors (17). See Table 3.

Table 3
Summary of Consensus Major Themes for Four Core Domains

Domain 1: Parental recall of information from the behavior-nutrition intervention (See Table 4, Quotes 1.1–2.5)

Table 4
Memorable Quotes from Parent Interviews

Major themes: Nutrition recommendations

Nutrition recommendations consisted of four major themes, and represented parent-reported strategies specific to how to achieve CF nutrition recommendations. Parents reported learning how to boost calories of foods using addables and spreadables (n=6 families). Parents discussed learning to shop for high-calorie foods (n=5), offer high-calorie beverages (n=5), and to offer snacks to increase daily calories (n=3).

Major themes: Behavior recommendations

Behavior recommendations consisted of 3 major themes, and represented treatment recommendations specific to how to improve child behavior. Parents recalled learning how to deliver both positive consequences (i.e., praise and rewards) and negative consequences (i.e., removal of privileges) to manage mealtime behavior (n=4). Several parents reported that prior to the intervention, they spent a great deal of time pleading with and coaxing their children to encourage them to eat. Parents discussed the value of learning to intentionally provide attention to eating behavior like taking bites rather than non-eating behavior such as refusing food (n=3). Parents also reported learning to adapt behavior management strategies to new situations based on child’s preferred rewards (n=4).

Domain 2: Ongoing challenges that impact CF management (See Table 4, Quotes 3.1–5.4)

Major theme: Parental stress

Parental stress (n=4) was one of the three themes identified as an ongoing challenge. Parental stress included fears related to the uncertainty of the course of CF and stress about parenting a child with a chronic illness. Parents also felt a sense of intense desperation to get their child to eat, including preparing separate meals for the child so that the child would eat.

Major theme: Picky eating

Ongoing challenges with picky eating and food refusal were commonly mentioned in spite of picky eating being a direct treatment target of the BN intervention (n=3). Some parents stated that the child may be compliant with all other areas of CF care, but that picky eating is still of concern.

Major theme: Behavioral noncompliance

The third ongoing challenge was general behavioral noncompliance (n=7). Behavioral noncompliance included refusal to eat, take enzymes, and complete a fecal fat test.

Domain 3: New challenges that affect CF care (see Table 4, Quotes 6.1–8.5)

Major theme: New diagnoses

In addition to the ongoing challenges, families encountered new challenges that impacted CF management. The first major theme in this domain involved families managing the care associated with new medical or psychiatric diagnoses (n=3). For this sample diagnoses included Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes (CFRD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Major theme: Transfer of treatment responsibility

The second major theme represented difficulty with transfer of treatment responsibility from parent to child (n=3). At the time of the BN treatment, the children’s care was managed exclusively by the parents. However at the time of the interview, parents reported challenges with their children taking consistent increased responsibility for certain aspects of CF management.

Major theme: Transition to school

Another major theme discussed by families was the difficulty managing the transition to school (n=5). First, parents voiced concerns about not being able to monitor calories consumed during the school day. Moreover, parents stated that their child was being offered smaller portions at school and consequently needed to compensate for decreased lunch intake at home, typically at dinner. Parents also mentioned the negative impact of missing school due to illness and hospitalization. Finally, parents discussed their struggles with partnering with schools to ensure that their children receive the appropriate accommodations. Some parents had success with educating the school administration and staff about CF, and one school was willing to implement a reward system to encourage eating. Unfortunately, parents also discussed challenges with garnering the school’s cooperation to provide appropriate accommodations.

Domain 4: Protective factors (See Table 4, Quotes 9.1–10.2)

Major theme: Family

Several parents mentioned protective factors specific to the family that had a positive impact on CF management (n=5). Family factors included parents communicating effectively with the CF team, including asking for help when needed, and eating family dinners together. Parents talked about the family communicating more openly and honestly with the child about CF now that the child is older as an important way for the child to learn about CF and understand the importance of adhering to treatment recommendations. Finally, one parent started a family competition to encourage the child to gain weight.

Major theme: Child

Several parents mentioned factors unique to the child that have a positive impact on CF management (n=6). Child factors included: a) increased understanding of the importance of eating more calories with age, b) increased behavior compliance with age, and c) generally enjoying food and eating well. Parents also talked about the child being hungrier with age and eating more with age. In addition, when the child enjoyed snacks, nutrition recommendations were better able to be achieved.


This is the first investigation conducted to understand family experiences with an empirically-supported behavior-nutrition (BN) treatment aimed to improve growth in children with CF. Data from this qualitative study draw attention to challenges that families face and highlight general areas for early and ongoing clinical assessment and intervention. Some of the challenges discussed by families are specific to the developmental transition between toddlerhood and school-age and have not received a great deal of attention in the CF literature.

Generalizability of the study findings is supported by the similarity of the study sample to previous research samples in two main areas. Prior to participating in the BN intervention, parents in the study had variable levels of knowledge about nutrition care in CF (4). Moreover, parent-reported responses to their children’s mealtime behavior prior to the intervention were similar to previous findings by Powers, Patton, & Byars (18), including the use of coaxing and pleading with their children during mealtimes to encourage them to eat.

While similar to previous samples in some respects, this cohort was able to provide a unique and valuable perspective that can be used to guide CF clinical care improvement and science. The families in the current study received an evidence-based treatment and were able to discuss many of the salient nutrition and behavioral recommendations that they learned. Families continued to use the strategies in some way several years later because they found them helpful. Notably, in spite of being directly targeted in the BN treatment and likely addressed in routine CF care, several parents reported that picky eating and behavioral noncompliance persisted beyond toddlerhood. Some families had only variable success with the recommendations, an outcome commonly observed in clinical trials and routine clinical care.

This study brings attention to new barriers to adherence and challenges that families may encounter as children move into early school-age that notably co-occur with ongoing challenges, such as parent stress. The most frequent new challenges described by families included the transition to school and transfer of treatment responsibility from parent to child. Previous qualitative research in the area of CF physiotherapy education also documented that preparing families for challenging developmental transitions is necessary (16). The transition to school is multifaceted because many potential stressors are introduced at this time such as increased schedule demands, school absences due to illness, and decreased influence over nutrition intake. The complex challenge associated with transfer of treatment responsibility has been actively studied in other pediatric populations. Family-based interventions have been developed that provide education and problem-solving skills (19, 20) to address the parent-child conflict associated with this process (21). This work has yet to be done in CF.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recognizes anticipatory guidance as a key aspect in the promotion of healthy physical, emotional, and social development for children and adolescents (22). The European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) affirms the importance of this preventative approach. However, healthcare providers sometimes miss opportunities to provide anticipatory guidance to parents, in spite of parents wanting this information (23). In line with the pediatric academies’ focus on prevention, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation has developed anticipatory guidance handouts detailing how to work with school settings to ensure appropriate accommodations, (24) and behavior-nutrition handouts to encourage positive eating behavior for children aged birth to 2 years (25).

The length of time between the end of the clinical trial and the interview was approximately five years and therefore the passing of time may have affected reported experiences with the BN intervention. In addition, given the increased focus on nutrition in CF care at our institution and many others during this time period, it is possible that parent recall of the intervention was influenced by recommendations or information received during standard CF care prior to the interview. In spite of the small sample of families interviewed, sufficient thematic saturation was supported by the limited number of themes that were excluded from the final analysis. However if more parents were available to be interviewed, novel ideographic content may have emerged.

Findings from the current study highlight the need for CF teams to provide families with anticipatory guidance regarding how to manage mealtime behavior, the transfer of treatment responsibility process, and preparing for the transition to school. These parent-reported needs align closely with those discussed by other parents of children in CF (26) who endorsed that they would like information about child behavior delivered through a parenting program, and that they preferred access to the program before the onset of child behavior problems. Moreover, while a behaviorally-based nutrition intervention is recommended as part of evidence-based care for children with CF with growth deficits, few children are able to receive this type of treatment due to the availability of trained providers and the feasibility of the treatment when conducted in a face-to-face format. Given these barriers, a promising avenue is developing, testing, and disseminating a web-based behavior-nutrition intervention.


This study was supported by grants R01 DK054915, K24 DK059973 and T32 DK063929 from the National Institutes of Health (S.W.P.). The study sponsors had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation, or the writing of this manuscript.


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


1. Borowitz D, Baker RD, Stallings V. Consensus report on nutrition for pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2002 Sep;35(3):246–259. [PubMed]
2. Mackner LM, McGrath AM, Stark LJ. Dietary recommendations to prevent and manage chronic pediatric health conditions: Adherence, intervention, and future directions. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;22(2):130–143. [PubMed]
3. Foster SW, Farrell PM. Enhancing nutrition in cystic fibrosis with comprehensive therapies. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 1996 Apr;22(3):238–239. [PubMed]
4. Modi AC, Quittner AL. Barriers to treatment adherence for children with cystic fibrosis and asthma: what gets in the way? Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2006 Sep;31(8):846–858. [PubMed]
5. Spieth LE, Stark LJ, Mitchell MJ, Schiller M, Cohen LL, Mulvihill M, et al. Observational assessment of family functioning at mealtime in preschool children with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2001 Jun;26(4):215–224. [PubMed]
6. Mitchell MJ, Powers SW, Byars KC, Dickstein S, Stark LJ. Family functioning in young children with cystic fibrosis: observations of interactions at mealtime. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;25(5):335–346. [PubMed]
7. Crist W, McDonnell P, Beck M, Gillespie CT. Behavior at mealtimes and the young child with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 1994;15(3):157–161.
8. Hammons AJ, Fiese B. Mealtime interactions in families of a child with cystic fibrosis: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2010 Sep 10;9(6):377–384. [PubMed]
9. Borowitz D, Robinson KA, Rosenfeld M, Davis SD, Sabadosa KA, Spear SL, et al. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation evidence-based guidelines for management of infants with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;155(6 Suppl):S73–S93. [PubMed]
10. Stallings VA, Stark LJ, Robinson KA, Feranchak AP, Quinton H. Evidence-based practice recommendations for nutrition-related management of children and adults with cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency: Results of a systematic review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2008 May;108(5):832–839. [PubMed]
11. Powers SW, Jones JS, Ferguson KS, Piazza-Waggoner C, Daines C, Acton JD. Randomized clinical trial of behavioral and nutrition treatment to improve energy intake and growth in toddlers and preschoolers with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1442–1450. [PubMed]
12. Stark LJ, Opipari LC, Spieth LE, Jelalian E, Quittner AL, Higgins L, et al. Contribution of behavior therapy to dietary treatment in cystic fibrosis: A randomized controlled study with 2-year follow-up. Behavior Therapy. 2003;34:237–258.
13. Stark LJ, Quittner AL, Powers SW, Opipari-Arrigan L, Bean JA, Duggan C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of behavioral intervention and nutrition education to improve caloric intake and weight in children with cystic fibrosis. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2009 Oct;163(10):915–921. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Powers SW, Spear SL, Sullivan SM, Chamberlin LA, Wooldridge JL, Acton JD. Behavior and nutrition treatment for preschoolers with CF: Weight and height z-score changes show improvement in growth at 4-year follow-up. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2008 S31:424.
15. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3:77–101.
16. Tipping CJ, Scholes RL, Cox NS. A qualitative study of physiotherapy education for parents of toddlers with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2010 Mar 30;9(3):205–211. [PubMed]
17. Spear SL, Brannon EE, Chamberlin LA, Sullivan SM, Barnett KA, Powers SW. Challenges of achieving CF nutrition recommendations during the transition between toddlerhood & early school-age: A qualitative analysis of parent experiences & strategies. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2010;45 S33:439. Abstract 605,
18. Powers SW, Patton SR, Byars KC, Mitchell MJ, Jelalian E, Mulvihill MM, et al. Caloric intake and eating behavior in infants and toddlers with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5) E75-5. [PubMed]
19. Harris MA, Freeman KA, Beers M. Family therapy for adolescents with poorly controlled diabetes: initial test of clinical significance. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2009 Nov–Dec;34(10):1097–1107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Wysocki T, Harris MA, Buckloh LM, Mertlich D, Lochrie AS, Taylor A, et al. Effects of behavioral family systems therapy for diabetes on adolescents' family relationships, treatment adherence, and metabolic control. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2006 Oct;31(9):928–938. [PubMed]
21. DeLambo KE, Ievers-Landis CE, Drotar D, Quittner AL. Association of observed family relationship quality and problem-solving skills with treatment adherence in older children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2004 Jul–Aug;29(5):343–353. [PubMed]
22. Green M, Palfrey JS, editors. Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 2002.
23. Nelson CS, Wissow LS, Cheng TL. Effectiveness of anticipatory guidance: recent developments. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;15(6):630–635. [PubMed]
24. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Day-to-Day: School and CF. Bethesda, MD: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; 2004.
25. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Age 2 and Beyond: Tips for Getting Your Child to Eat Enough Calories. Bethesda, MD: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; 2010.
26. Ward C, Massie J, Glazner J, Sheehan J, Canterford L, Armstrong D, et al. Problem behaviours and parenting in preschool children with cystic fibrosis. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2009 May;94(5):341–347. [PubMed]