PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcmidmBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
 
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12: 10.
Published online 2012 February 24. doi:  10.1186/1472-6947-12-10
PMCID: PMC3315440
Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review
Francis Lau,corresponding author1 Morgan Price,2 Jeanette Boyd,3 Colin Partridge,4 Heidi Bell,1 and Rebecca Raworth5
1School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3050 STN CSC, Victoria V8W3P5, Canada
2Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Blvd, Vancouver V6T1Z3, Canada
3Admirals Medical Clinic, 275 Island Hwy, Victoria V9B1G4, Canada
4Kootenay Boundary and Creston Community of Practice, 518 Lake Street, Nelson V1L4C6, Canada
5University of Victoria Libraries, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1800 STN CSC, Victoria V8W3H5, Canada
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Francis Lau: fylau/at/uvic.ca; Morgan Price: morgan/at/virtuallypriceless.org; Jeanette Boyd: dr.jeanette.boyd/at/gmail.com; Colin Partridge: chp/at/uvic.ca; Heidi Bell: heidi.bell/at/telus.net; Rebecca Raworth: raworthr/at/uvic.ca
Received August 10, 2011; Accepted February 24, 2012.
Abstract
Background
Increased investments are being made for electronic medical records (EMRs) in Canada. There is a need to learn from earlier EMR studies on their impact on physician practice in office settings. To address this need, we conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of EMRs in the physician office, factors that influenced their success, and the lessons learned.
Results
For this review we included publications cited in Medline and CINAHL between 2000 and 2009 on physician office EMRs. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact of EMR on physician practice in office settings. The Clinical Adoption Framework provided a conceptual scheme to make sense of the findings and allow for future comparison/alignment to other Canadian eHealth initiatives.
In the final selection, we included 27 controlled and 16 descriptive studies. We examined six areas: prescribing support, disease management, clinical documentation, work practice, preventive care, and patient-physician interaction. Overall, 22/43 studies (51.2%) and 50/109 individual measures (45.9%) showed positive impacts, 18.6% studies and 18.3% measures had negative impacts, while the remaining had no effect. Forty-eight distinct factors were identified that influenced EMR success. Several lessons learned were repeated across studies: (a) having robust EMR features that support clinical use; (b) redesigning EMR-supported work practices for optimal fit; (c) demonstrating value for money; (d) having realistic expectations on implementation; and (e) engaging patients in the process.
Conclusions
Currently there is limited positive EMR impact in the physician office. To improve EMR success one needs to draw on the lessons from previous studies such as those in this review.
Articles from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central