Animal mitochondrial DNA is a small molecule that has been used extensively in population genetic, phylogenetic, and biogeographic studies (
Avise, 2004). Although originally considered remarkably uniform, recent sampling has uncovered substantial diversity in the organization of animal mitochondrial genomes (
Lavrov, 2011). In particular, each sampled phylum of non-bilaterian animals (
e.g., Cnidaria, Placozoa, Porifera) and even most major lineages within them (
e.g., demosponges vs. glass sponges) have revealed distinct modes and tempos of mitochondrial genome evolution (
Kayal and Lavrov, 2008;
Haen et al., 2007;
Wang and Lavrov, 2008;
Signorovitch et al., 2007). Substantial variation has been found in the gene content, rates of sequence evolution, structures of encoded rRNA and tRNA, genetic code used in mitochondrial translation, presence or absence of introns, and percentage of non-coding DNA (reviewed in
Lavrov, 2011). To date, complete mitochondrial genome sequences have been generated for more than 2,000 animals, representing the wide spectrum of metazoan diversity and partial mtDNA sequences (such as
cox1 barcodes) are available for thousands of other species (
Ratnasingham and Hebert, 2007). Despite this remarkable collection of mtDNA sequences from a multitude of species, one glaring omission remains: no genuine mitochondrial sequence has been reported to date for the phylum Ctenophora.
Ctenophores are a small, well-defined phylum of mostly pelagic, carnivorous, marine animals with a simple body plan and uncertain phylogenetic affinity to other Metazoa (
Harbison, 1985). They are characterized by biradial symmetry, an oral-aboral axis delimited by a mouth and an apical sensory organ, a locomotor system made of eight rows of laterally reinforced macrocilia or comb plates, and, in most species, a pair of retractable tentacles that contain specialized adhesive cells called colloblasts (
Hernandez-Nicaise, 1991). All ctenophores have a well-developed gastrovascular system that functions in digestion, circulation, excretion, and reproduction. The rest of the body volume consists primarily of a poorly differentiated gelatinous mesogloea containing several cell types, including muscle cells and neurons (
Hernandez-Nicaise, 1991). Most ctenophores are extremely fragile and difficult to culture and, as such, we know relatively little about their biology (
Pang and Martindale, 2008b).
The lack of mtDNA data from the phylum Ctenophora is unfortunate for several reasons. From an evolutionary perspective, ctenophore lineage diverged from other animals very early in metazoan evolution. Fossils with ctenophore-like morphology have been reported from the early Cambrian period (~540 MYA) (
Chen et al., 2007) and some intriguing morphological connections were suggested for Ctenophora and Ediacaran taxa (
Dzik, 2002). Because ctenophores evolved independently from the rest of Metazoa for hundreds of millions of years, they may have retained some revealing mitochondrial features from their common ancestor with other animals or evolved some unique features not present anywhere else in the animal kingdom. As an aside, the popular idea that, as an early branching lineage, ctenophores should display mostly ancestral traits is incorrect (c.f.,
Crisp and Cook, 2005).
From a phylogenetic perspective, the mitochondrial data may help to elucidate the phylogenetic position of Ctenophora, which is still hotly debated, as well as improve our understanding of the relationship within this phylum. Traditionally, two distinct phylogenetic hypotheses have been considered for Ctenophora based on morphological and/or embryological data: (i) grouping them with Cnidaria (the Coelenterata hypothesis;
Haeckel (1866) and Hyman (
Hyman, 1940)), ii) placing them as a sister group to Bilateria (the Acrosomate hypothesis; (
Lang, 1881;
Ax, 1996)). By contrast, early molecular phylogenies tended to place ctenophores as the sister group to Cnidaria + Bilateria, either by themselves (the Planulozoa hypothesis; (
Wainright et al., 1993;
Wallberg et al., 2004)), or with calcareous sponges (
Collins, 1998). Recent phylogenomic studies utilizing gene supermatrices based largely on EST data have yielded conflicting results as to the phylogenetic position of Ctenophora. Two of these studies placed ctenophores as the sister group to all metazoans, including sponges (
Dunn et al., 2008;
Hejnol et al., 2009). Phylogenomic analyses by a different group of researchers put ctenophores either in a clade with the Cnidaria, supporting the traditional Coelenterata hypothesis (
Philippe et al., 2009) or as a sister group to a clade that included Cnidaria, Bilateria and Placozoa (
Pick et al., 2010). Another set of studies utilized whole genome data from all four non-bilaterian phyla, including the ctenophore
Mnemiopsis leidyi, to examine gene superfamilies (
Reitzel et al., 2011;
Ryan et al., 2010) and signaling pathway components (
Pang et al., 2010) across the Metazoa. Based on the presence or absence of superfamily classes, superfamily subclasses, and pathway components, these authors supported a grouping of Cnidaria, Placozoa, and Bilateria (the ParaHoxozoa) to the exclusion of Porifera and Ctenophora (
Ryan et al., 2010). Remarkably, the phylogeny within Ctenophora is also unresolved, mainly because of the surprising conservation of 18S rRNA sequences, the only marker used so far to study it (
Podar et al., 2001). Thus, additional markers or new approaches are clearly needed for phylogenetic studies involving ctenophores.
Finally, from structural analyses, ctenophore mitochondria possess an unusual arrangement of tubular cristae (
Horridge, 1964) unlike most other animals, fungi, and choanozoa that have flat cristae (
Cavalier-Smith, 1993). Earlier studies placed heavy emphasis on these mitochondrial features in phylogenetic inference (e.g.,
Cavalier-Smith, 1993), although modern investigations have questioned the value of this character for phylogenetic inference (
Frey and Mannella, 2000). There is little known about the reasons for this difference and whether there is any correlation between mtDNA evolution and mitochondrial morphology.
The ctenophore
Mnemiopsis leidyi (the warty comb jelly or sea walnut) is an important predator in many pelagic marine ecosystems (
Colin et al., 2010). Native to the Atlantic coast of North and South America, it has gained global notoriety for its invasion of several seas of the Mediterranean basin (
Shiganova et al., 2001). This ctenophore also has become one of the model species in developmental and evolutionary biology (
Pang and Martindale, 2008a). The
M. leidyi genome sequencing project (
Pang et al., 2010;
Ryan et al., 2010; unpublished) has produced sequences for several candidate mitochondrial genes. We used this information to design primers and to PCR-amplify the complete mitochondrial genome from this species. In addition, we used the available nuclear genomic data to obtain deeper insights into the mitochondrial biology of
M. leidyi. Here, we describe this genome and report its very unusual evolutionary trajectory.