PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of npgopennature.com homepage
Oncogene
 
Oncogene. 2012 March 1; 31(9): 1176–1180.
Published online 2011 July 25. doi:  10.1038/onc.2011.306
PMCID: PMC3307058

Hipk2 cooperates with p53 to suppress γ-ray radiation-induced mouse thymic lymphoma

Abstract

A genome-wide screen for genetic alterations in radiation-induced thymic lymphomas generated from p53+/− and p53−/− mice showed frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 6. Fine mapping of these LOH regions revealed three non-overlapping regions, one of which was refined to a 0.2 Mb interval that contained only the gene encoding homeobox-interacting protein kinase 2 (Hipk2). More than 30% of radiation-induced tumors from both p53+/− and p53−/− mice showed heterozygous loss of one Hipk2 allele. Mice carrying a single inactive allele of Hipk2 in the germline were susceptible to induction of tumors by γ-radiation, but most tumors retained and expressed the wild-type allele, suggesting that Hipk2 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene for mouse lymphoma development. Heterozygous loss of both Hipk2 and p53 confers strong sensitization to radiation-induced lymphoma. We conclude that Hipk2 is a haploinsufficient lymphoma suppressor gene.

Keywords: Hipk2, p53, radiation, tumorigenesis

Introduction

The p53 tumor suppressor gene, one of most commonly mutated genes in a wide spectrum of human and animal tumors, controls cellular responses to DNA damage and forms a critical link to downstream effectors of growth arrest or cell death. We have previously described a genetic screen for modifiers of p53-dependent or -independent pathways leading to tumorigenesis in the mouse (Cai et al., 2002; Mao et al., 2004, 2007). This approach identified loci on chromosomes 3, 16 and 18, which undergo genetic alterations, specifically in tumors from mice carrying at least one functional p53 allele, and are therefore likely to contain genes that mediate p53 signaling during tumor development. Additional loci on chromosomes 6, 12 and 19 showed genomic changes that were completely independent of the presence of p53. Detailed sublocalization of the commonest region of genomic alterations on chromosome 6 has enabled us to find a locus, which contains only one gene, the homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 (Hipk2) gene.

Hipk2 is a recently identified serine/threonine nuclear kinase that is highly conserved in mammalian organisms. Hipk2 acts as a multi-functional transcriptional regulator and corepressor that regulate cell growth, apoptosis, proliferation and development. HIPK2 has been found to be activated by a variety of DNA damaging agents, including ultraviolet light, ionizing radiation and genotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs (D'Orazi et al., 2002; Hofmann et al., 2002; Di Stefano et al., 2004; Dauth et al., 2007). In response to DNA damage, HIPK2 activates human p53 by promoting site-specific phosphorylation at Ser46 and subsequently activates apoptotic p53 target genes including PUMA, Noxa, DR5, PIG3, p53AIP1 and Bax (D'Orazi et al., 2002; Hofmann et al., 2002; Di Stefano et al., 2004; Pistritto et al., 2007). In addition, HIPK2 has also been shown to interact with and promote the degradation of CtBP in response to ultraviolet-induced DNA damage, and can induce p53 independent apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2003). HIPK2 has also been shown to induce phosphorylation and degradation of c-Myb through the Wnt signaling pathway in the control of cell proliferation (Kanei-Ishii et al., 2004) and to interact with several proteins containing the high mobility group I domain, a highly conserved domain in transcription factors of the lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1/T cell factor (LEF1-TCF) family (Pierantoni et al., 2001, 2007). Our previous study showed that germline deficiency of Hipk2 increased susceptibility to two-stage chemically induced skin tumor development (Wei et al., 2007), suggesting that Hipk2 may act as a tumor suppressor gene. Herein, we demonstrate loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of Hipk2 in radiation-induced tumors from both p53+/− and p53−/− mice and show that Hipk2 deficiency in mice promotes γ-radiation-induced tumor development.

Results

Sublocalization of LOH regions on chromosome 6

A substantial proportion of lymphomas induced in p53+/− and p53−/− mice by γ-radiation treatment show LOH on chromosome 6 (Mao et al., 2004). Although most of the tumors showed large-scale losses involving the whole chromosome, several showed discrete patterns of loss that implicated at least three separate regions of deletion (Figure 1a). The smallest interval identified from our initial screen was a 0.2-Mb region between D6Mit91 and D6Mit222. This interval encodes only the Hipk2 gene, a multi-functional transcriptional cofactor that regulates cell growth and proliferation. In a search for point mutations in the Hipk2 coding region, the complete coding sequence was determined from 20 tumors from p53+/− mice and a further 20 tumors from p53−/− mice. No point mutations were found in any of the tumors. RNA was available from all lymphomas that showed LOH at the Hipk2 locus, and in all cases, the remaining Hipk2 allele was present (Figure 1b), indicating that no gene silencing had occurred. Further, we quantified the expression of Hipk2 in radiation-induced thymic lymphoma by quantitative TaqMan analysis. Figure 1c shows that 50% of tumors with LOH (7/14) had clearly reduced Hipk2 mRNA levels in comparison with normal thymus, or with tumors that retained both parental alleles (retention of heterozygosity) of Hipk2. We conclude that Hipk2 is subject to genetic changes leading to reduced expression in a substantial proportion of lymphomas from p53 heterozygous mice.

Figure 1
LOH of Hipk2 in radiation-induced thymic lymphomas. (a) Detailed analysis of partial LOH patterns on chromosome 6 sublocalized three regions, denoted by the horizontal lines at the top of the figure. Physical mapping of markers and genes is based on the ...

Hipk2 cooperates with p53 in γ-radiation-induced tumorigenesis

To investigate whether loss of Hipk2 accelerated γ-irradiation-induced tumorigenesis in vivo, 37 Hipk2+/− and 31 wild-type mice were exposed to a single dose of 4-Gy γ-irradiation at 5 weeks of age. At the same time, 51 Hipk2+/− and 34 wild-type mice were left untreated and observed concurrently to determine the spontaneous rate of tumor development. Within 75 weeks, only one unirradiated Hipk2+/− mouse, none of the unirradiated wild-type mice and two irradiated wild-type mice developed tumors, in contrast to more than 40% of irradiated Hipk2+/− mice (Figure 2a). We conclude that Hipk2 is a functional tumor suppressor gene, loss of which increases susceptibility to tumors induced by radiation exposure. Importantly, loss of one allele of Hipk2 also accelerated tumorigenesis in irradiated p53+/− mice (P=0.015 for tumorigenesis in 29 p53+/− mice versus 36 Hipk2+/−p53+/− mice; Figure 2b), in agreement with the observation of p53-independent deletions of this chromosomal region in mouse lymphomas (Mao et al., 2004).

Figure 2
Hipk2-deficient mice are susceptible to radiation-induced tumor development. (a) Spontaneous and radiation-induced tumorigenesis in Hipk2+/− and wild-type mice. 37 Hipk2+/− and 31 wild-type mice were exposed to a single ...

Hipk2 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor

Our observation of high frequency LOH, absence of point mutations and any evidence of silencing of the remaining allele suggested that Hipk2 might function as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene. In agreement with this interpretation, tumors from the Hipk2+/−p53+/− double heterozygous mice showed loss of the remaining Hipk2 allele in only 1 of 20 tumors investigated, whereas loss of the remaining p53 allele was found in 18 of 20 tumors (Figure 3a). Expression of Hipk2 was detected at the RNA level in tumors that had retained the wild-type allele, indicating that no gene silencing had taken place (Figure 3b). We conclude that Hipk2 has many of the properties of a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene, in that loss of one copy confers predisposition without requiring complete inactivation of the remaining allele.

Figure 3
Hipk2 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene. (a) LOH analysis of thymic lymphomas from Hipk2+/−p53+/− mice on chromosome 6 and 11. PCR analysis was carried out on 20 matched normal—tumor DNA samples to investigate ...

Discussion

In this report, we have shown that LOH of the mouse Hipk2 gene occurs frequently in radiation-induced thymic lymphomas. Most tumors retain and express one copy of the wild-type allele, demonstrating that the Hipk2 gene has a haploinsufficient role in mouse lymphoma development. Deletion analysis of lymphoma DNA samples allowed us to localize the smallest common region of deletion to a 200-kb region containing only Hipk2, thus identifying this gene as the most viable candidate tumor suppressor.

A functional role for Hipk2 in lymphomagenesis was demonstrated using mice carrying germline mutations in the Hipk2 gene. Hipk2 heterozygous mice are susceptible to radiation-induced tumorigenesis, but tumors retained and expressed the wild-type allele, in agreement with the hypothesis that loss of a single gene copy is sufficient to impact tumor susceptibility. Our observations of a haploinsufficient effect of Hipk2 loss in lymphomagenesis suggests that chromosome changes resulting in copy number changes on human chromosome 7q34, where HIPK2 is located, may have a role in development of human leukemias and solid tumors in which this chromosome undergoes somatic alterations (Mitelman et al., 2010). Others have reported rare HIPK2 mutations in AML (Li et al., 2007), but there are also reports of amplification of HIPK2 in some cancers (Deshmukh et al., 2008), suggesting a complex role that is context dependent. This complexity is further underlined by apparently contradictory results on the effects of Hipk2 on cell growth. Pierantoni et al. (2001) demonstrated that Hipk2 can act as a suppressor of proliferation, but nevertheless cells from Hipk2 knockout (KO) mice have variously been reported to exhibit decreased (Trapasso et al., 2009) or increased (Wei et al., 2007) cell growth in vitro. The reasons or these discrepancies are unclear, and may be related to the specific nature of the KO alleles or the genetic background from which the cells were derived. Our data demonstrate conclusively that Hipk2 is a tumor suppressor gene in vivo; however, the fact that tumors retain and express one wild-type allele suggests that complete Hipk2 loss may in some way be detrimental to tumor growth. The mechanistic basis for the positive or negative effects of Hipk2 on cell growth and tumor development remains to be established.

Although HIPK2 has been implicated in regulating p53-dependent cell growth and apoptosis (D'Orazi et al., 2002; Hofmann et al., 2002), our studies on radiation-induced tumor development in the Hipk2/p53 double heterozygous mice show that the activities of these two genes in lymphomagenesis are independent, as germline deletion of one copy of both genes shows additive effects on lymphoma susceptibility.

Independent effects of loss of p53 and of Hipk2 were also evident during the somatic events involved in tumor progression, as loss of one Hipk2 allele was also found in tumors from p53−/− mice. Documented p53-independent functions of HIPK2 include induction of apoptosis upon DNA damage, through proteasomal degradation of CtBP (Zhang et al., 2003), but whether this mechanism is linked to the tumor suppressor role of Hipk2 in lymphoma susceptibility and progression remains to be determined.

Materials and methods

Mice and tumor induction

p53 and Hipk2 single or double heterozygous KO mice were generated by crossing Hipk2+/− heterozygous KO (Wei et al. 2007) with p53+/− heterozygous KO mice (C57BL/6J), purchased from The Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Mice at 5 weeks of age of both sexes were exposed to a single dose of 4-Gy whole body γ-irradiation and monitored daily until moribund, then killed and autopsied. Mice were bred and treated under University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) Laboratory Animal Resource Center (LARC) regulations.

Preparation of DNA

Thymic lymphomas and normal tissues were minced and placed in a microfuge tube containing 0.5 ml lysis buffer (100 m Tris–HCl, pH 8.5; 5 m ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 200 m NaCl). Proteinase K was added at a final concentration of 100 μg/ml and incubated at 55 °C overnight. The lysate was extracted twice with an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v) (GibcoBRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA). DNA in the lysate was precipitated by addition of an equal volume of isopropanol. The DNA precipitates were solubilized in TE buffer (10 m Tris–HCl, pH 8.0 and 1 m ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid).

Sublocalizing LOH on chromosome 6 by PCR of microsatellite markers

LOH was determined by PCR of microsatellite markers, with normal and tumor DNA from the same mice. Map position was based on the Ensembl (http://uswest.ensembl.org/Mus_musculus). The primers for microsatellite marker within the Hipk2 gene are: F: AGCTTAGATGGTCTGTGGAA; R: GCAGGTCTCTACTAGCATGG.

PCR primer pairs for markers were purchased from Qiagen Operon (www.operon.com). PCR reactions were set up in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 2 μl of 10 × PCR buffer (Bioline, Tauton, MA, USA), 1.6 μl of 2.5 m dNTPs (Pharmacia Biosystem Ltd, Piscataway, NJ, USA), 1 μl (6.6 μ) of each primer, 0.6 μl of 50 m MgCl2 (Bioline), 11.7 μl dH2O, 0.1 μl Taq polymerase (Bioline) and 2 μl (40 ng/μl) tumor or normal tissue DNA. Amplifications were initially denatured at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C or 52 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, and then a final incubation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were then mixed with loading buffer and electrophoresed in 4% (3% NuSieve/1% agarose) agarose gel with 0.5 mg/ml ethidium-bromide, photographed and saved in image file for analysis of density of bands.

Mutational analysis of the Hipk2 coding region

Total RNA was extracted from tumor tissue samples with the TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Reverse transcription PCR reactions were performed using Thermoscript RT–PCR system (GibcoBRL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mutation analysis of the Hipk2 gene was performed by PCR amplification of cDNA from thymic lymphomas by using the following primers:

F1: TCAAGTGCCTTCTGTAGTGTGAA; R1: CATAAAGGTTCTGCTCCAACATC; F2: GAGTGCTTCCAGCACAAGAAC; R2: TAACAGGTCAATGAACTCCCG; F3: GGACAAAGACAACTAGGTTTTTCAA; R3: TGGTAGTTTAGTATGGAGACTTCGG; F4: CCAATCCCGAAGTCTCCATA; R4: TGGTTGTTGCCTCATCACAT; F5: GCATGCAGCTGTGATTCCT; R5: GTGTCCAAGGTGTTGGTGC; F6: CAAGCGTGTCAAGGAGAACA; R6: AGCTCCCTGAAGAGTGTCCA; F7: CAGTCACCATTCGTCCTCCT; R7: GGTCTCTTCTCCGCTCTCAA.

PCR products were purified by gel electrophoresis and sequenced by Quintarabio (www.quintarabio.com).

Detection of Hipk2 mRNA expression using Taqman assay

Total RNAs from all tumors and three normal thymuses were used to assess Hipk2 mRNA expression by TaqMan Assays-on-Demand (Mm00439329_m1), purchased from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Hipk2 expression was measured using the ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). PCR reactions were performed in triplicate for each sample and experiments were repeated a minimum of three times. Ct values were normalized against β-actin RNA (ΔCt=Ct of Hipk2−Ct of β-actin). The relative Hipk2 expression was calculated by 2^(−ΔΔCt), where ΔΔCt=(ΔCt of sample)−(average ΔCt of three normal thymuses).

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the expression levels of Hipk2 between tumors with LOH and retention of heterozygosity. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare the survival time post-radiation between different groups of genotypes of mice using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA).

Acknowledgments

These studies were supported by NIH/NCI grant U01 CA84244 and the DOE (DE-FG02-03ER63630) to AB, and NIH/NCI grant R01 CA116481, Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the US Department of Energy under Contract No DE-AC02-05CH11231 and Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program (LDRD) to JHM. AB acknowledges support from the UCSF Genome Analysis Core and the Barbara Bass Bakar Chair of Cancer Genetics.

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • Cai WW, Mao JH, Chow CW, Damani S, Balmain A, Bradley A. Genome-wide detection of chromosomal imbalances in tumors using BAC microarrays. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:393–396. [PubMed]
  • Deshmukh H, Yeh TH, Yu J, Sharma MK, Perry A, Leonard JR, et al. High-resolution, dual-platform aCGH analysis reveals frequent HIPK2 amplification and increased expression in pilocytic astrocytomas. Oncogene. 2008;27:4745–4751. [PubMed]
  • Di Stefano V, Blandino G, Sacchi A, Soddu S, D'Orazi G. HIPK2 neutralizes MDM2 inhibition rescuing p53 transcriptional activity and apoptotic function. Oncogene. 2004;23:5185–5192. [PubMed]
  • Dauth I, Krüger J, Hofmann TG. Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 is the ionizing radiation-activated p53 serine 46 kinase and is regulated by ATM. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2274–2279. [PubMed]
  • D'Orazi G, Cecchinelli B, Bruno T, Manni I, Higashimoto Y, Saito S, et al. Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:11–19. [PubMed]
  • Hofmann TG, Möller A, Sirma H, Zentgraf H, Taya Y, Dröge W, et al. Regulation of p53 activity by its interaction with homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:1–10. [PubMed]
  • Kanei-Ishii C, Nomura T, Tanikawa J, Ichikawa-Iwata E, Ishii S. Differential sensitivity of v-Myb and c-Myb to Wnt-1-induced protein degradation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:44582–44589. [PubMed]
  • Li XL, Arai Y, Harada H, Shima Y, Yoshida H, Rokudai S, et al. Mutations of the HIPK2 gene in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome impair AML1- and p53-mediated transcription. Oncogene. 2007;26:7231–7239. [PubMed]
  • Mao JH, Perez-Losada J, Wu D, Delrosario R, Tsunematsu R, Nakayama KI, et al. Fbxw7/Cdc4 is a p53-dependent, haploinsufficient tumour suppressor gene. Nature. 2004;432:775–779. [PubMed]
  • Mao JH, Wu D, Perez-Losada J, Jiang T, Li Q, Neve RM, et al. Crosstalk between Aurora-A and p53: frequent deletion or downregulation of Aurora-A in tumors from p53 null mice. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:161–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mitelman F, Johansson B, Mertens F.(eds). (2010. Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations and Gene Fusions in Cancer . http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman .
  • Pierantoni GM, Fedele M, Pentimalli F, Benvenuto G, Pero R, Viglietto G, et al. High mobility group I (Y) proteins bind HIPK2, a serine-threonine kinase protein which inhibits cell growth. Oncogene. 2001;20:6132–6141. [PubMed]
  • Pierantoni GM, Rinaldo C, Mottolese M, Di Benedetto A, Esposito F, Soddu S, et al. High-mobility group A1 inhibits p53 by cytoplasmic relocalization of its proapoptotic activator HIPK2. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:693–702. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pistritto G, Puca R, Nardinocchi L, Sacchi A, D'Orazi G. HIPK2-induced p53Ser46 phosphorylation activates the KILLER/DR5-mediated caspase-8 extrinsic apoptotic pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1837–1839. [PubMed]
  • Trapasso F, Aqeilan RI, Iuliano R, Visone R, Gaudio E, Ciuffini L, et al. Targeted disruption of the murine homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 causes growth deficiency in vivo and cell cycle arrest in vitro. DNA Cell Biol. 2009;28:161–167. [PubMed]
  • Wei G, Ku S, Ma GK, Saito S, Tang AA, Zhang J, et al. HIPK2 represses beta-catenin-mediated transcription, epidermal stem cell expansion, and skin tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13040–13045. [PubMed]
  • Zhang Q, Yoshimatsu Y, Hildebrand J, Frisch SM, Goodman RH. Homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 promotes apoptosis by downregulating the transcriptional corepressor CtBP. Cell. 2003;115:177–186. [PubMed]

Articles from NPG Open Access are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group