PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Subst Use Misuse. Author manuscript; available in PMC Mar 16, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3305804
NIHMSID: NIHMS359904
A Pilot Training Program for a Motivational Enhancement Approach to Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Among Individuals in Israeli Methadone Treatment Centers
Diane S. Morse,1,2 Miriam Schiff,3 Shabtay Levit,3,4 Rinat Cohen-Moreno,5 Geoffrey C. Williams,2,6,7 and Yehuda Neumark8
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
2Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
3The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
4Jerusalem & Ashdod Methadone Maintenance Treatment Programs, Jerusalem, Israel
5Branch for Welfare Statistics, Central Bureau of Statistics, Jerusalem, Israel
6Center for Community Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
7Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
8Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Address correspondence to Diane Morse, Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, 300 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642; diane_morse/at/urmc.rochester.edu
Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be cleared, very few infected persons complete the treatment, resulting in disease progression and transmission. Motivational interventions effectively address health and substance-use-related conditions in many cultures. The research team piloted an HCV treatment motivational enhancement training and supervision for four counselors treating four patients in one (of 11) large methadone programs in Israel between 2007 and 2008. The counselors received a 3-day training followed by seven supervision sessions. Training included cultural and language adaptation from the original United States version to practice in Israel. Feasibility was assessed and demonstrated through training field notes and questionnaire feedback, review of taped intervention sessions for counselor proficiency and patient engagement, and patient completion of intervention sessions and piloted measures. While positive feasibility outcomes were noted, future studies should employ larger numbers of counselors and patients to assess the effectiveness of motivational enhancement in promoting HCV treatment in methadone patients.
Keywords: hepatitis C virus (HCV), motivation, self-determination, methadone maintenance program, illicit drug use, addiction, Israel
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common chronic blood-borne infection in much of the world, with about 200 million people infected across the globe or 3% of the world population (Marcellin, 2009; Shepard, Finelli, & Alter, 2005). Up to 90% of the 3–4 million annual new infections worldwide occur among injecting drug users (IDUs), with prevalence from 40% to 90% throughout East and West Europe, Asia, North America, Latin America, and Australia (Aceijas & Rhodes, 2007; Dore, Law, MacDonald, & Kaldor, 2003; Edlin et al., 2005; George et al., 2009; McCarthy & Flynn, 2001; Van den Berg et al., 2007). In Israel, where we conducted our study, HCV prevalence among IDUs has been found to be 35%–45% (Cohen-Moreno et al., 2010; Loebstein et al., 2008).
One-quarter to one-half of those infected with HCV develop severe liver disease (Lavanchy, 2009). Viral clearance can be attained and maintained by 60%–90% of those treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin-based therapies, depending on genotype, viral load, age, and alcohol use (Deutsch & Hadziyannis, 2008; Edlin et al., 2005; Fried et al., 2002; Loguercio et al., 2000). Yet, an effective, widespread treatment is elusive, as up to 63% refuse or do not complete the treatment (Narasimhan et al., 2006). In the United States and elsewhere, drug users face health insurance barriers to access HCV treatment (HCVT) (Doab, Treloar, & Dore, 2005; Edlin et al., 2005; Grebely et al., 2008). Israeli citizens are offered HCVT at reduced cost ($80/month of the $1,000/month actual cost) through government-subsidized health care services since 2005, yet less than 100 (7%) of the estimated 1,500 HCV-infected methadone patients in the country have undergone treatment (Cohen-Moreno et al., 2010). Internationally, multiple barriers to HCVT exist at system, practitioner, and patient levels (Figure 1; Edlin et al., 2005; Fischer et al., 2006; Fishbein, Lo, Reinus, Gourevitch, & Klein, 2004; Hallinan, Byrne, Agho, & Dore, 2007). These include, among others, limited HCV knowledge among IDUs (Cohen-Moreno et al., 2010; O’Brien, Day, Black, & Dolan, 2008; Strauss et al., 2007) and substance abuse treatment staff (Litwin et al., 2007; Zickmund, Ho, Masuda, Ippolito, & LaBrecque, 2003), stigma regarding the disease which can be inadvertently reinforced by treatment providers (Crockett & Gifford, 2004; Fraenkel, McGraw, Wongcharatrawee, & GarciaTsao, 2006), and immediacy of incapacitating side effects of treatment versus potential or distal effects of the disease (Khokhar & Lewis, 2007; Zickmund et al., 2006).
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Multiple HCVT barriers.
Patients must have the resilience to overcome multiple barriers at different levels: personal, systemic, and provider based (Evon et al., 2010). It has been hypothesized that patients could be assisted in strengthening the skills and determination to address barriers (Fraenkel et al., 2006; Groessl et al., 2008; Strathdee et al., 2005; Strauss et al., 2007), while providing information and collaborative treatment that is empowering and does not reinforce patient stigma (Tiffen & Sheridan, 2002). A recent intervention addressed some HCVT barriers at an Israeli methadone maintenance program among otherwise abstinent patients (Malnick, Sheidvasser, Basevitz, & Levit, 2009). Patients who scored very low in HCV knowledge received an intervention to remedy this deficit, which when combined with an on-site hepatologist and financial coverage of that portion of the medication not covered by health insurance, increased treatment uptake from 7% to 23% (Malnick et al., 2009). However, this still leaves room for improvement in HCVT uptake.
We present herein a pilot training program for a motivational enhancement (ME) approach to HCVT in a methadone maintenance center in Jerusalem, Israel.
Motivational Enhancement
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a directive, patient-centered approach for facilitating behavior change by assisting patients to explore and resolve ambivalence (Miller & Rollnick, 2002). MI utilizes acceptance, reflection, and empathy and has been proven more beneficial in changing behaviors than a confrontational or blaming approach (Miller, 1983). The theoretical basis for MI has been described as self-determination theory (SDT), wherein the counselor supports the client’s autonomous self-regulation (a feeling of volition or willingness for the targeted behavior) and perceived competence (a feeling of being able to attain the targeted goal) to energize or motivate the behavior (Miller & Brown, 1991). The traditional exhortations of health care providers are more likely to engender controlled motivation (behavior contrary to one’s values or interests or due to someone else’s values or interests; Deci, Eghrari, Patrick, & Leone, 1994; Ryan & Deci, 2008). Our intervention was designed as a synthesis of both the MI manual (Miller & National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1995) and a successful six-session SDT-based intervention for tobacco dependence (Williams et al., 2006a). Hence, we entitle our intervention with the generic term, motivational enhancement (ME). Similarly, our measures of patient self-regulation and perceived competence are SDT based. In HCVT, extrinsic motivation could be a patient taking medication because he believes his physician wants him to do so rather than because he believes it is in his interest. Amotivation could be characterized as a patient having no interest in HCVT. Perceived competence, in the domain of HCVT, could be described as the extent to which a patient believes he can manage the complex challenges of treatment completion (Williams et al., 2006b).
Although ME is known in Israel and was recommended to help patients refrain from illicit drug use (Israel Anti Drug Authority, personal communication, February 4, 2008), there is little supportive evidence in Israel. We found only two descriptive reports of MI interventions addressing the misuse of drugs (Epelboym, 1995) and alcohol (Friedman & Marchevsky, 1995).
SDT has proven applicable across cultures (Chirkov, Ryan, Youngmee, & Kaplan, 2003), as has MI (Miller, Villanueva, Tonigan, & Cuzmar, 2007). Importantly, ME interventions have not been prospectively studied to address patient utilization of HCVT in any population, despite the success of the model across continents and disease processes.
Our goals for this exploratory pilot study were to assess the following: (1) the feasibility of training Israeli methadone maintenance staff in ME to be demonstrated by observing their intervention skills; (2) the applicability of ME for patients considering HCVT to be demonstrated by patient engagement in HCVT discussion during the ME sessions; and (3) the preliminary feasibility of implementing the intervention among Israeli methadone patients as demonstrated by completion of the intervention sessions and performance of the piloted translated motivational measures.
The methods are presented in Table 1 according to the stated goals. For Goal 1—training Israeli methadone maintenance staff in ME, the principal investigator (PI) adapted a previously developed (manuscript in preparation) 66-page ME manual into a six-session intervention, specifically targeting HCVT behaviors. The manual incorporated components from an MI substance abuse manual, as others have done (Carels et al., 2007; Channon et al., 2007; Miller & National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1995). The six-session design and its content (see Table 2) were based upon a validated SDT-based intervention for tobacco dependence (Williams et al., 2006a). The investigators held a 3-day training workshop that included brief didactic presentations, demonstration video, and extensive skills practice. These methods were based upon ME facilitator trainings, and materials were adapted with permission (Miller & Deci, personal communication, November 12, 2007). All staff members of two methadone maintenance centers (in the cities of Jerusalem and Ashdod) attended the workshop. The supervision component of the training was continued only for the four counselors in the Jerusalem center chosen to perform the intervention, based upon English proficiency, clinical skill level, and degree of rapport with the PI. Those in supervised training received an ME training manual, which was revised iteratively according to the counselors’ input, and review of audio or videotaped sessions. In all of the seven supervision sessions over 8 weeks, the counselors were instructed to enhance autonomous self-regulation through building rapport and exploring advantages and disadvantages of health-promoting behaviors. The counselors were instructed to offer information about the consequences and treatment of HCV as follows: ask patients what they know already about HCV course and treatment, supplement knowledge as needed and desired, and then solicit patient responses (Williams, Gagné, Ryan, & Deci, 2002). Materials regarding HCV and depression were written in patient-friendly language by relevant specialists. The counselors were instructed to explore patients’ perceived personal and systemic barriers to facilitate HCV health behaviors, while providing support for patients’ autonomy and perceived competence. Individualized HCV health plans were developed according to patients’ readiness using a template plan on which patients highlighted self-chosen behaviors. The counselors were also instructed in the use of empathy, reflection, and confrontation avoidance in resistant patients, which are counseling strategies common to SDT and MI and are expected to increase autonomous self-regulation.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1
Study goals and method of assessment
TABLE 2
TABLE 2
Overview of ME sessions
Instruction was in English and Hebrew, while the intervention was held in Hebrew and Russian. An interpreter facilitated mutual understanding between the Hebrew-speaking counselors and the English-speaking PI at all training sessions. Training materials were culturally adapted and translated or subtitled into Hebrew by the investigator (MS) and the translator (a social work graduate student)—both fluent in written and spoken Hebrew and English. The PI met with a Hebrew or Russian translator to preview all the taped intervention sessions for the four counselors prior to group supervision. The PI and one of the trainee counselors independently recorded process notes. Investigators administered an anonymous questionnaire in Hebrew to workshop participants to evaluate the training. The evaluation addressed general satisfaction (1 question); internalization of ME tactics (10 questions) including empathy, discrepancy, rolling with resistance, supporting self-efficacy, open-ended questions, reflective listening, affirmation, summarizing, response to change talk, and response to resistance talk (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93); utility of learning methods (6 questions) including manual, lecture, exercises, video examples, skills practice in small groups, and discussion in the large group (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88); and plans for the future incorporation of lessons learned (2 questions) regarding using ME spirit/components and working according to the ME manual (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75). All questions were rated on a 10-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 “not at all” to 10 “to a great extent.”
For Goal 2—applying ME to HCVT, the research team held a discussion about HCVT barriers and facilitators with five methadone program clients, who recently completed HCVT, and their spouses. Their input informed subsequent HCV-oriented ME strategies and was integrated into the ME training. The PI and coinvestigators adapted the treatment self-regulation questionnaire (TSRQ) and perceived competence scale (PCS; Williams et al., 2006b) to measure autonomous regulation and competence regarding HCVT for the preliminary estimation of reliability and face validity.
For Goal 3—implementing the intervention among Israeli methadone patients, four pilot HCV patients, who were not then undergoing HCVT, received a six-session intervention in their native language (Hebrew or Russian), using ME to address pretreatment fears and ambivalence about HCVT and its physical and psychological side effects. The written TSRQ and PCS measures were also piloted among 30 patients.
This project was approved by the institutional review board of the School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University, and conducted in 2007–2008.
Participant Selection
Of 321 Jerusalem methadone center patients, 146 (45.5%) were HCV positive. Of 102 available patients, we randomly chose 30 to perform the written measures. From those 30, we purposefully chose 4 for the intervention based upon their not having taken any medical action regarding their HCV and having engaged in a therapeutic alliance with a social worker at the center.
Data Analysis
We computed first-order descriptive analyses [means and standard deviations (SDs)] to assess participants’ satisfaction with the workshop. We reviewed field notes from the counselor supervision sessions for their reports of client engagement, counselor adherence to the ME approach, and needed cultural adaptation. We computed Cronbach’s alpha coefficients on the TSRQ and PCS measures to assess the internal reliability of the scale items.
Feasibility of Training
A total of 30 staff members (social workers, physicians, physician assistants, and administrative staff) attended the first 2 days of workshop training, of whom 23 completed feedback questionnaires. On a 10-point scale, the mean satisfaction score was 8.00 (SD = 1.76), the mean self-reported internalization of ME tactics score was 7.58 (SD=1.62), and the mean utility of learning methods was 7.93 (SD = 1.54). Self-predicted implementation of ME by counselors was somewhat less than expected (mean score = 6.67, SD = 1.64), prompting the decision to hold a 1-day reinforcement workshop.
We defined cultural feedback as a consensus by trainees that elements of the manual were discordant with patients’ culture. For example, Russian counselors caring for Russian patients indicated that some Hebrew phrases did not meaningfully translate, and that a manual in Russian with sample phrases would be helpful. These counselors devised some relevant statements, which were back translated into English and deemed consistent with ME style.
Initial counselor resistance to ME was evident. Some counselors voiced concern that supporting patient’s autonomy about taking medications instead of pressuring patients to do so gave too much power to the patient. This was a paradoxical complaint by the counselors since the patient does ultimately make the choice of whether or not to take medications. Early intervention tapes demonstrated frequent lapses into controlling and even sarcastic statements made by these counselors, as in the example below.
  • An example of resistant counselor (C)/resistant patient (P):
  • C: What do you think caused you not to go and take this blood test again?
  • P: Nothing is stopping me from doing that.
  • C: I remember the doctor told you 2–3 weeks ago that you should take the test.
  • P: I understood that I have time and it’s not urgent.
  • C: Well, yes; you’re right. You really do have a lot of time. In about 10 years, you’ll have cirrhosis or cancer. You’ll have plenty of time to get the disease.
By the end of the supervision, all the four counselors demonstrated subjective proficiency (according to the trainer knowledgeable in ME) with autonomy-supportive tactics (Table 3).
TABLE 3
TABLE 3
Examples of elicited interest in change or self-efficacy talk
The research team adapted the manual based upon PI and counselor supervision process notes. For example, patient HCV and depression information sheets addressed the likely effects of HCVT on the ability to work, similarities of HCVT side effects to opiate withdrawal symptoms, and a flowchart for HCVT steps. Also, since one client found it useful to ask another patient questions about his HCVT, this option was added. Lastly, since one patient asked that the counselor assists in making a hepatologist appointment and accompanies him to the visit, this option was also added to the manual with explicit confidentiality guidelines.
Applicability of ME to HCVT
The discussion with HCV-treated patients and their spouses confirmed the presence of depression that impacted negatively on relationships with spouse and children and on employment. Consequently, the manual explicitly addressed potential depression.
The process notes and audio or videotapes of the intervention sessions revealed that all four clients engaged in discussions during the intervention sessions of whether or not to start HCVT. This is notable since patients were not pressured to discuss HCVT and utilized the sessions in self-directed ways.
Questionnaire Function
We administered the TSRQ and PCS to 30 patients (as described above), demonstrating face validity, in that all understood the content sufficiently to complete them, and reliability: Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were adequate for the TSRQ autonomous motivation subscale (0.77) and the controlled motivation subscale (0.79). Perceived competence as measured for 30 patients by the PCS yielded a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.82 for the competence subscale.
Feasibility of Implementing the Intervention Among Israeli Methadone Patients
All four patients completed the six-session intervention, and tape reviews revealed that change talk regarding HCVT had occurred (see Table 3). All patients reported depressive symptoms, minimal healthy behaviors, low self-efficacy, and barriers to HCVT. Demonstrating the potential utility of the intervention, three of the four patients subsequently went for HCV testing. For one of them, the test results indicated the patient did not need treatment. After testing, the other two decided not to go for treatment—one of the two was found to have HCV type 1, which is less responsive to treatment (Zeuzem, 2004).
This pilot study applies a novel structured ME intervention to HCVT. We describe the feasibility of training Israeli methadone maintenance counselors in ME, the applicability of ME to patients considering HCVT, and the feasibility of implementing an experimental ME intervention targeting HCVT among Israeli methadone patients. This was a Phase 1 study, attempting to establish whether this could be a promising treatment approach (Rounsaville, Carroll, & Onksen, 2001).
There were a number of preliminary indications of feasibility. Dialogues revealed the increasing use of ME tactics by the trained counselors. Additionally, all clients completed the intervention, and tape review indicated that patients willingly engaged in discussing HCVT. Since all the methadone patients attend clinic regularly, a six-session weekly intervention would not be difficult. Training methadone staff was appropriate, as they regularly encounter these patients.
Although HCVT improves outcomes for many patients, side effects and treatment challenges complicate the decision even when the cost of treatment is low. Hence, it is ethically appropriate for counselors to remain neutral and support patients to decide for themselves, providing information regarding the risks and benefits of treating or not treating (Braddock, Edwards, Hasenberg, Laidley, & Levinson, 1999). ME has been successfully applied to HIV treatment adherence, systemically complex with a long latent disease, multiple treatment side effects, and a similar patient population, supporting its potential role in HCVT (Kennedy, Goggin, & Nollen, 2004; Parsons, Golub, Rosof, & Holder, 2007).
We demonstrated the feasibility of training Israeli counselors despite initial language and cultural barriers. Similarly, the translated ME measures (TSRQ and PCS) showed promise in this new intervention. Other populations have successfully translated and evaluated ME in a variety of domains (Chirkov et al., 2003; Roth, Assor, Kanat-Maymon, & Kaplan, 2006). Although only 4 staff participated in the intervention, all 23 of the 30 staff who gave feedback reported nearly 80% satisfaction, learning, and internalization of tactics. Counselor criteria for this pilot study included the ability to achieve a therapeutic alliance, key for therapeutic change and for provision of autonomy support in ME (Castonguay, Constantino, & Holtforth, 2006; Julius, Novitsky, & Dubin, 2009; Kennedy et al., 2004).
Introducing an intervention into this methadone maintenance program setting was complex. We were open to culturally informed feedback (Chirkov et al., 2003). We performed a microlevel intervention for patients to address their own HCVT barriers. Four measured domains of stigma are social isolation, social rejection, financial insecurity, and internalizing shame (Fife & Wright, 2000). For a microintervention to be effective, it would need to address intrapersonal and interpersonal treatment barriers and help patients cope with stigma from health care providers, family, and others. Acceptance and empathy are integral to ME, which has improved health services utilization in substance abusing populations (Shanahan, Beers, Alford, Brigandi, & Samet, 2010); hence, it seems possible that ME could be shown to decrease stigma in future studies.
Similar to others (Miller & Mount, 2001), our work indicates that strong supervision is needed after a long workshop introduction to develop and maintain counselor fidelity in ME interventions. This sort of ongoing supervision and regular training opportunities would also be needed to address staff turnover.
Potential limitations of this project warrant mention. First, we did not measure counselor fidelity in ME according to standards such as that measured by the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity scale (Miller&Mount, 2001) or the Health Care Climate (Williams & Deci, 2001). However, this pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of training as one of its goals. Future studies could more precisely examine fidelity and effectiveness. Other studies have rigorously applied and validated the translated measures (Brueck et al., 2009), and such a study could be applied in Hebrew and/or Russian in Israel. Second, our study is based on a purposeful sample of those willing to participate and with engaged counseling relationships, so it did not investigate those who could most benefit from a motivational intervention. It was also a purposeful sample of counselors and treatment programs, so did not indicate what conditions or qualities would promote counselor performance or program success. As a Phase 1 pilot study (Rounsaville et al., 2001), numbers were small and the study was not a randomized clinical trial. Post-ME motivation and satisfaction outcomes were not measured for this small group, although we did assess whether they engaged in subsequent HCVT. Potential patient and counselor process and outcome measures for future studies are presented in Table 4. Wider implementation would also require programmatic support, which we did have for this project, but on a larger scale. Finally, this pilot study does not aim to demonstrate generalizability or large-scale feasibility. There is evidence that Israeli and US methadone patients share much in common (Peles, Linzy, Kreek, & Adelson, 2008), and our small sample of four patients had diverse stages of HCV and ethnicities. This pilot study of the intervention and measures on a small scale suggests preliminary feasibility for a larger-scale study.
TABLE 4
TABLE 4
Criteria for assessing outcomes in future studies
CONCLUSION
The pilot community-based six-session ME intervention addressing HCVT services utilization demonstrated preliminary feasibility regarding training and supervising counselors, face validity of the translated measures in this population, applicability to HCVT, transferability to Israeli culture in content and translation, and acceptability. Counselors subjectively demonstrated the ability to support patient autonomy by the end of the supervision period. Future studies could evaluate ME in larger randomized trials with Israeli methadone patients considering HCVT.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the patients, counselors, and staff of the methadone centers in Ashdod and Jerusalem, Israel, for their participation in this study. We also gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Samah Salaime-Egbariya MSW for her assistance in translating the measures and manual. We gratefully acknowledge Kelly Cava, Caroline Chen, Heather Clifford, Meaghan Bernstein, and Peter Tran for technical assistance.
GLOSSARY
HCVHepatitis C Virus
HIVHuman Immunodeficiency Virus
Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program (MMTP)supervised administration of long-acting opiate as a treatment for opiate addiction
Self-Determination Theory (SDT)an empiric theory and practice of motivation in which human motivation is explained by autonomous regulation, autonomy support, and perceived competence
Motivational Interviewing (MI)a particular motivational intervention utilizing specific tactics and methods
Motivational Enhancementthe general class of motivational interventions

Biographies
Dr. Diane S. Morse, MD, is an Assistant Professor of medicine and psychiatry at the School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester. She is an internist whose present research focuses on the application of self-determination theory to comorbid HIV and HCV treatment utilization. She has also published research on sequelae of family violence history, including childhood abuse and intimate partner violence, and on empathy and selfdisclosure in patient-physician communication. Her clinical work currently focuses on medical care of patients with psychiatric comorbidities. Her activities during the period of this project were funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH T32 MH18911, PI Eric Caine, MD) and the Fulbright Scholar Program, US Department of State.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms359904b1.gif Object name is nihms359904b1.gif
Dr. Miriam Schiff, Ph.D., MSW, is a Senior Lecturer and the Head of the MSW program at the Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University. She is also a Licensed School Psychologist and a Social Worker. Her research and publications focus on the associations between man-made trauma and substance use as well as mental health in general among youth and women. She has published several articles on the aftereffects of collective trauma and on the helping components in social work services and interventions. Her clinical activity includes working as a volunteer with drug-addicted women in a methadone clinic in Jerusalem, providing them individual and group treatment.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms359904b2.gif Object name is nihms359904b2.gif
Dr. Shabtay Levit, Ph.D., MSW, IL, is the Chairman of Directors of Israel’s Methadone Clinics. Dr. Levit created and directs both the methadone treatment programs and the needle exchange programs in Jerusalem and Ashdod. He is also an Adjunct Lecturer at the Hebrew University School of Social Work and Social Welfare. His areas of interest are creating and improving systems and individual models of rehabilitation for substance use clients, and utilizing technology to improve the quality of social and health services for deprived populations such as substance users. He has several publications on these topics.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms359904b3.gif Object name is nihms359904b3.gif
Rinat Cohen-Moreno, MPH and licensed paramedic, is the Director of the Branch for Welfare Statistics in the Central Bureau of Statistics, Israel. Her research topics are children at risk and juvenile and adult delinquency. Previously, she worked for several years in a Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program as the Director of methadone distribution. She was a member of the methadone program management and development committee, and led the clinical and research efforts toward extending the HCV testing and treatment coverage at the program.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms359904b4.gif Object name is nihms359904b4.gif
Dr. Geoffrey C. Williams, Ph.D., MD, is currently the Director of the Healthy Living Center at the University of Rochester. He is also a Professor of medicine, psychiatry, and psychology. He has 20 years of practice experience in academic internal medicine and training as a health psychologist. He has contributed to the development of the self-determination theory model for health behavior change. He has been the recipient of numerous grants including research support from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Small Business Innovation Research, and the National Institute of Mental Health. He has published over 50 peer-reviewed articles as well as books and numerous book chapters. In addition, he has presented at over 50 major national professional meetings.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms359904b5.gif Object name is nihms359904b5.gif
Dr. Yehuda Neumark, Ph.D., MPH, is a tenured Senior Lecturer of epidemiology at the Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine of Hebrew University-Hadassah in Jerusalem, Israel. His research focuses on the epidemiology of alcohol and drug use and misuse in Israel and globally, using his research findings to inform policy whenever possible. He serves as the Director of the Braun School’s International Master of Public Health Program, mentors master and doctoral students, and teaches courses in epidemiology, quantitative research methods in public health, and community-oriented health care. He is becoming increasingly interested in the use of information and communication technologies for health promotion, specifically developing drug and alcohol Internet-based interventions for young adults. If asked about his greatest accomplishment, he would say his children and grandchildren.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms359904b6.gif Object name is nihms359904b6.gif
Footnotes
This manuscript was previously presented as follows:Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting, Miami, FL, May 2009.
Declaration of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.
  • Aceijas C, Rhodes T. Global estimates of prevalence of HCV infection among injecting drug users. International Journal on Drug Policy. 2007;18(5):352–358. [PubMed]
  • Braddock CH, III, Edwards KA, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in out-patient practice: Time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282(24):2313–2320. [PubMed]
  • Brueck RK, Frick K, Loessl B, Kriston L, Schondelmaier S, Go C, et al. Psychometric properties of the German version of the motivational interviewing treatment integrity code. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2009;36(1):44–48. [PubMed]
  • Carels RA, Darby L, Cacciapaglia HM, Konrad K, Coit C, Harper J, et al. Using motivational interviewing as a supplement to obesity treatment: A stepped-care approach. Health Psychology. 2007;26(3):369–374. [PubMed]
  • Castonguay LG, Constantino MJ, Holtforth MG. The working alliance: Where are we and where should we go? Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/Practice/Training. 2006;43(3):271–279. [PubMed]
  • Channon SJ, Huws-Thomas MV, Rollnick S, Hood K, Cannings-John RL, Rogers C, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing in teens with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1390–1395. [PubMed]
  • Chirkov V, Ryan RM, Youngmee K, Kaplan U. Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;84(1):97–110. [PubMed]
  • Cohen-Moreno R, Schiff M, Levitt S, Bar-Hamburger R, Strauss S, Neumark Y. Knowledge about hepatitis-C among methadone maintenance treatment patients in Israel. Substance Use & Misuse. 2010;45(1–2):58–76. [PubMed]
  • Crockett B, Gifford SM. “Eyes wide shut”: Narratives of women living with hepatitis C in Australia. Women and Health. 2004;39(4):117–137. [PubMed]
  • Deci EL, Eghrari H, Patrick BC, Leone DR. Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality. 1994;62(1):119–142. [PubMed]
  • Deutsch M, Hadziyannis SJ. Old and emerging therapies in chronic hepatitis C: An update. Journal of Viral Hepatitis. 2008;15(1):2–11. [PubMed]
  • Doab A, Treloar C, Dore GJ. Knowledge and attitudes about treatment for hepatitis C virus infection and barriers to treatment among current injection drug users in Australia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;40(5 Suppl):S313–S320. [PubMed]
  • Dore GJ, Law M, MacDonald M, Kaldor JM. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Australia. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2003;26(2):171–184. [PubMed]
  • Edlin BR, Kresina TF, Raymond DB, Carden MR, Gourevitch MN, Rich JD, et al. Overcoming barriers to prevention, care, and treatment of hepatitis C in illicit drug users. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;40(5 Suppl):S276–S285. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Epelboym R. Motivational interviewing: Theory and practice. Society and Welfare. 1995;15(2–3):317–326.
  • Evon D, Simpson K, Esserman D, Verma V, Smith S, Fried M. Barriers to accessing care in patients with chronic Hepatitis C: The impact of depression. Aliment Pharmacol Theraputics. 2010;32(9):1163–1173. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fife BL, Wright ER. The dimensionality of stigma: A comparison of its impact on the self of persons with HIV/AIDS and cancer. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2000;41(1):50–67. [PubMed]
  • Fischer B, Kalousek K, Rehm J, Powis J, Krajden M, Reimer J. Hepatitis C, illicit drug use and public health: Does Canada really have a viable plan? Canadian Journal of Public Health Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique. 2006;97(6):485–488. [PubMed]
  • Fishbein DA, Lo Y, Reinus JF, Gourevitch MN, Klein RS. Factors associated with successful referral for clinical care of drug users with chronic hepatitis C who have or are at risk for HIV infection. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999) 2004;37(3):1367–1375. [PubMed]
  • Fraenkel L, McGraw S, Wongcharatrawee S, GarciaTsao G. Patients’ experiences related to anti-viral treatment for hepatitis C. Patient Education and Counseling. 2006;62(1):148–155. [PubMed]
  • Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Gonçales FL, Jr, et al. Peg interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(13):975–982. [PubMed]
  • Friedman AM, Marchevsky A. No deductions: Enhancing motivation for cooperation in a relapse prevention group. Society and Welfare. 1995;15(2–3):327–336.
  • George SL, Bacon BR, Brunt EM, Mihindukulasuriya KL, Hoffmann J, Di Bisceglie AM. Clinical, virologic, histologic, and biochemical outcomes after successful HCV therapy: A 5-year follow-up of 150 patients. Hepatology. 2009;49(3):729–738. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grebely J, Genoway KA, Raffa JD, Dhadwal G, Rajan T, Showler G, et al. Barriers associated with the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection among illicit drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2008;93(1–2):141–147. [PubMed]
  • Groessl EJ, Weingart KR, Kaplan RM, Clark JA, Gifford AL, Ho SB. Living with hepatitis C: Qualitative interviews with hepatitis C-infected veterans. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2008;23(12):1959–1965. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hallinan R, Byrne A, Agho K, Dore GJ. Referral for chronic hepatitis C treatment from a drug dependency treatment setting. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2007;88(1):49–53. [PubMed]
  • Julius RJ, Novitsky MA, Jr, Dubin WR. Medication adherence: A review of the literature and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Psychiatric Practice. 2009;15(1):34– 44. [PubMed]
  • Kennedy S, Goggin K, Nollen N. Adherence to HIV medications: Utility of the theory of self-determination. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2004;28(5):611–628.
  • Khokhar OS, Lewis JH. Reasons why patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus choose to defer treatment: Do they alter their decision with time? Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2007;52(5):1168–1176. [PubMed]
  • Lavanchy D. The global burden of hepatitis C. Liver International. 2009;29(1 Suppl):74–81. [PubMed]
  • Levesque CS, Williams GC, Elliot D, Pickering MA, Bodenhamer B, Finley PJ. Validating the theoretical structure of the treatment self-regulation questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. Health Education Research. 2007;22(5):691–702. [PubMed]
  • Litwin AH, Kunins HV, Berg KM, Federman AD, Heavner KK, Gourevitch MN, et al. Hepatitis C management by addiction medicine physicians: Results from a national survey. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2007;33:99–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Loebstein R, Mahagna R, Maor Y, Kurnik D, Elbaz E, Halkin H, et al. Hepatitis C, B, and human immunodeficiency virus infections in illicit drug users in Israel: Prevalence and risk factors. Israel Medical Association Journal. 2008;10:775–778. [PubMed]
  • Loguercio C, Di Pierro M, Di Marino MP, Federico A, Disalvo D, Crafa E, et al. Drinking habits of subjects with hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease: Prevalence and effect on clinical, virological and pathological aspects. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2000;35(3):296–301. [PubMed]
  • Malnick SD, Sheidvasser V, Basevitz A, Levit S. A model for treating HCV hepatitis in patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(5):A831.
  • Marcellin P. Hepatitis B and hepatitis C in 2009. Liver International. 2009;29(1 Suppl):1–8. [PubMed]
  • McCarthy JJ, Flynn N. Hepatitis C in methadone maintenance patients: Prevalence and public policy implications. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2001;20(1):19–31. [PubMed]
  • Miller WR. Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behavioural Psychotherapy. 1983;11(2):147–172.
  • Miller WR, Brown JM. Self-regulation as a conceptual basis for the prevention and treatment of addictive behaviours. In: Heather N, Miller WR, Greeley J, editors. Self-control and the addictive behaviours. Sydney: Maxwell Macmillan; 1991. pp. 3–79.
  • Miller WR, Mount KA. A small study of training in motivational interviewing: Does one workshop change clinician and client behavior? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2001;29(4):457–471.
  • Miller WR. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Motivational enhancement therapy with drug abusers. s.l: University of New Mexico Press; 1995.
  • Miller WR, Rollnick S. Preparing people for change. 2. New York: Guilford Press; 2002. Motivational interviewing.
  • Miller WR, Villanueva M, Tonigan JS, Cuzmar I. Are special treatments needed for special populations? Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly. 2007;25(4):63–78.
  • Narasimhan G, Sargios TN, Kalakuntla R, Homel P, Clain DJ, Theise ND, et al. Treatment rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C after liver biopsy. Journal of Viral Hepatitis. 2006;13(11):783–786. [PubMed]
  • O’Brien S, Day C, Black E, Dolan K. Injecting drug users’ understanding of hepatitis C. Addictive Behaviors. 2008;33:1602–1605. [PubMed]
  • Parsons JT, Golub SA, Rosof E, Holder C. Motivational interviewing and cognitive-behavioral intervention to improve HIV medication adherence among hazardous drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2007;46(4):443–450. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Peles E, Linzy S, Kreek MJ, Adelson M. One-year and cumulative retention as predictors of success in methadone maintenance treatment: A comparison of two clinics in the United States and Israel. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2008;27(4):11–25. [PubMed]
  • Roth G, Assor A, Kanat-Maymon Y, Kaplan H. Assessing the experience of autonomy in new cultures and contexts. Motivation and Emotion. 2006;30:365–376.
  • Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onksen LS. A stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started andmoving on from stage 1. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice. 2001;8:133–142.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology. 2008;49(3):186–193.
  • Shanahan CW, Beers D, Alford DP, Brigandi E, Samet JH. A transitional opioid program to engage hospitalized drug users. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2010;25(8):803–808. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2005;5(9):558–567. [PubMed]
  • Strathdee SA, Latka M, Campbell J, O’Driscoll PT, Golub ET, Kapadia F, et al. Factors associated with interest in initiating treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among young HCV-infected injection drug users. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;40(Suppl 5):S304–S312. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Strauss SM, Astone-Twerell JM, Munoz-Plaza C, Des Jarlais DC, Gwadz M, Hagan H, et al. Drug treatment program patients’ hepatitis C virus (HCV) education needs and their use of available HCV education services. BMC Health Services Research. 2007;7:39. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tiffen L, Sheridan S. Improving take-up of hepatitis C services. Nursing Times. 2002;98(43):30–32. [PubMed]
  • Van den Berg CH, Smit C, Bakker M, Geskus RB, Berkhout B, Jurriaans S, et al. Major decline of hepatitis C virus incidence rate over two decades in a cohort of drug users. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2007;22(3):183–193. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Williams GC, Deci EL. Activating patients for smoking cessation through physician autonomy support. Medical Care. 2001;39(8):813–823. [PubMed]
  • Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate glucose control in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1644–1651. [PubMed]
  • Williams GC, Gagné M, Ryan RM, Deci EL. Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology. 2002;21(1):40–50. [PubMed]
  • Williams GC, McGregor H, Sharp D, Kouides RW, Lévesque CS, Ryan RM, et al. A self-determination multiple risk intervention trial to improve smokers’ health. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006a;21(12):1288–1294. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Williams GC, McGregor HA, Sharp D, Levesque C, Kouides RW, Ryan RM, et al. Supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychology. 2006b;25(1):91–101. [PubMed]
  • Zeuzem S. Heterogeneous virologic response rates to interferon-based therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Who responds less well? Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004;140(5):370–381. [PubMed]
  • Zickmund SL, Bryce CL, Blasiole JA, Shinkunas L, LaBrecque DR, Arnold RM. Majority of patients with hepatitis C express physical, mental, and social difficulties with antiviral treatment. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2006;18(4):381–388. [PubMed]
  • Zickmund SL, Ho EY, Masuda M, Ippolito L, LaBrecque DR. “They treated me like a leper.” Stigmatization and the quality of life of patients with hepatitis C. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2003;18(10):835–844. [PMC free article] [PubMed]