PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcmicrBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Microbiology
 
BMC Microbiol. 2012; 12: 25.
Published online Feb 24, 2012. doi:  10.1186/1471-2180-12-25
PMCID: PMC3305651
Influence of wet distillers grains diets on beef cattle fecal bacterial community structure
William C Rice,corresponding author1 Michael L Galyean,2 Stephen B Cox,3 Scot E Dowd,4 and N Andy Cole1
1Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, USDA ARS, Bushland, TX 79012, USA
2Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
3Research and Testing Laboratories, 1004 Garfield Dr. Building #340, Lubbock, TX 79416, USA
4Molecular Research (MR DNA), 503 Clovis Road, Shallowater, TX 79363, USA
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
William C Rice: william.rice/at/ars.usda.gov; Michael L Galyean: michael.galyean/at/ttu.edu; Stephen B Cox: stephen.cox/at/researchandtesting.com; Scot E Dowd: sdowd/at/mrdnalab.com; N Andy Cole: andy.cole/at/ars.usda.gov
Received September 29, 2011; Accepted February 24, 2012.
Abstract
Background
The high demand for ethanol in the U.S. has generated large stocks of wet distillers grains (DG), a byproduct from the manufacture of ethanol from corn and sorghum grains. Little is known, however, about the potential influence of dietary DG on fecal microbial community structure. A better understanding of the microbial population in beef cattle feces could be an important monitoring tool to facilitate goals of improving nutrient management, increasing animal growth performance and decreasing odors and/or shedding of pathogens. Five diets consisting of a traditional diet fed to finishing beef cattle in the Southern High Plains of Texas-CON (steam-flaked corn control with 0% DG), and four concentrations of DG in the dietary dry matter; 10 C (10% corn-based DG), 5S (5% sorghum-based DG), 10S (10% sorghum DG), and 15S (15% sorghum DG) were fed to steers at the Texas Tech University Burnett Animal Center. Diets were essentially isonitrogenous with a formulated crude protein value of 13.5%.
Results
Fecal grab samples were obtained from 20 steers (n = 4 per diet) and the barcoded DNA pyrosequencing method was used to generate 127,530 16S operational taxonomic units (OTUs). A total of 24 phyla were observed, distributed amongst all beef cattle on all diets, revealing considerable animal to animal variation, however only six phyla (core set) were observed in all animals regardless of dietary treatment. The average abundance and range of abundance, respectively of the core phyla were as follows: Firmicutes (61%, 19 to 83%), Bacteroidetes (28%, 11 to 63%), Proteobacteria (3%, 0.34 to 17.5%), Tenericutes (0.15%, 0.0 to 0.35%), Nitrospirae (0.11%, 0.03 to 0.22%), and Fusobacteria (0.086%, 0.017 to 0.38%). Feeding DG-based diets resulted in significant shifts in the fecal microbial community structure compared with the traditional CON. Four low abundance phyla significantly responded to dietary treatments: Synergistetes (p = 0.01), WS3 (p = 0.054), Actinobacteria (p = 0.06), and Spirochaetes (p = 0.06).
Conclusions
This is, to our knowledge, the first study using this method to survey the fecal microbiome of beef cattle fed various concentrations of wet DG. Comparison of our results with other cattle DNA sequencing studies of beef and dairy cattle feces from a variety of geographical locations and different management practices identifies a core set of three phyla shared across all cattle. These three phyla, in order of relative abundance are; Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria. The presence of large animal-to-animal variation in cattle microbiome was noted in our study as well as by others.
Articles from BMC Microbiology are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central