PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmccancBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Cancer
 
BMC Cancer. 2012; 12: 70.
Published online Feb 15, 2012. doi:  10.1186/1471-2407-12-70
PMCID: PMC3305548
Survival after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy versus self-expanding metal stent insertion in the setting of inoperable esophageal cancer: a case-control study
George Sgourakis,1,2 Ines Gockel,corresponding author1,5 Constantine Karaliotas,2 Markus Moehler,3 Carl Christoph Schimanski,3 Heinz Schmidberger,4 and Theodor Junginger1
1Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University-Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
22nd Surgical Department and Surgical Oncology Unit of "Korgialenio-Benakio", Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece
31st Medical Clinic and Policlinic, Johannes Gutenberg University-Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
4Department of Radiooncology, Johannes Gutenberg University-Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
5Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University-Hospital of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
George Sgourakis: ggsgourakis/at/yahoo.gr; Ines Gockel: Ines.Gockel/at/unimedizin-mainz.de; Constantine Karaliotas: conkaral/at/gmail.com; Markus Moehler: markus.moehler/at/unimedizin-mainz.de; Carl Christoph Schimanski: christoph.schimanski/at/unimedizin-mainz.de; Heinz Schmidberger: heinz.schmidberger/at/unimedizin-mainz.de; Theodor Junginger: junginger/at/uni-mainz.de
Received September 10, 2011; Accepted February 15, 2012.
Abstract
Background
Our aim was to compare survival of the various treatment modality groups of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in relation to SEMS (self-expanding metal stents) in a retrospective case-control study. We have made the hypothesis that the administration of combined chemoradiotherapy improves survival in inoperable esophageal cancer patients.
Methods
All patients were confirmed histologically as having surgically non- resectable esophageal carcinoma. Included were patients with squamous cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma as well as Siewert type I--but not type II - esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma. The decision to proceed with palliative treatments was taken within the context of a multidisciplinary team meeting and full expert review based on patient's wish, co-morbid disease, clinical metastases, distant metastases, M1 nodal metastases, T4-tumor airway, aorta, main stem bronchi, cardiac invasion, and peritoneal disease. Patients not fit enough to tolerate a radical course of definitive chemo- and/or radiation therapy were referred for self-expanding metal stent insertion. Our approach to deal with potential confounders was to match subjects according to their clinical characteristics (contraindications for surgery) and tumor stage according to diagnostic work-up in four groups: SEMS group (A), Chemotherapy group (B), Radiotherapy group (C), and Chemoradiotherapy group (D).
Results
Esophagectomy was contraindicated in 155 (35.5%) out of 437 patients presenting with esophageal cancer to the Department of General and Abdominal Surgery of the University Hospital of Mainz, Germany, between November 1997 and November 2007. There were 133 males and 22 females with a median age of 64.3 (43-88) years. Out of 155 patients, 123 were assigned to four groups: SEMS group (A) n = 26, Chemotherapy group (B) n = 12, Radiotherapy group (C) n = 23 and Chemoradiotherapy group (D) n = 62. Mean patient survival for the 4 groups was as follows: Group A: 6.92 ± 8.4 months; Group B: 7.75 ± 6.6 months; Group C: 8.56 ± 9.5 months, and Group D: 13.53 ± 14.7 months. Significant differences in overall survival were associated with tumor histology (P = 0.027), tumor localization (P = 0.019), and type of therapy (P = 0.005), respectively, in univariate analysis. Treatment modality (P = 0.043) was the only independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis. The difference in overall survival between Group A and Group D was highly significant (P < 0.01) and in favor of Group D. As concerns Group D versus Group B and Group D versus Group C there was a trend towards a difference in overall survival in favor of Group D (P = 0.069 and P = 0.059, respectively).
Conclusions
The prognosis of inoperable esophageal cancer seems to be highly dependent on the suitability of the induction of patient-specific therapeutic measures and is significantly better, when chemoradiotherapy is applied.
Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central