PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 4, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3305287
NIHMSID: NIHMS347892
Afadin, a Ras/Rap effector that controls cadherin function, promotes spine and excitatory synapse density in the hippocampus
Gerard M. J. Beaudoin, III,1,5 Claude M. Schofield,2,6 Tulip Nuwal,3,6 Keling Zang,1 Erik M. Ullian,1,2,7 Bo Huang,3,7 and Louis F. Reichardt1,4*
1Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
2Department of Opthamology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
4Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158
*Correspondence to: Louis F. Reichardt, Departments of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, louis.reichardt/at/ucsf.edu
5Neurosciences Institute, University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 78249
6These authors contributed equally.
7These authors contributed equally.
Many molecules regulate synaptogenesis, but intracellular signaling pathways required for their functions are poorly understood. Afadin is a Rap-regulated, actin-binding protein that promotes cadherin complex assembly as well as binding many other cell adhesion molecules and receptors. To examine its role in mediating synaptogenesis, we deleted afadin (mllt1), using a conditional allele, in post-mitotic hippocampal neurons. Consistent with its role in promoting cadherin recruitment, afadin deletion resulted in 70% fewer and less intense N-cadherin puncta with similar reductions of β-catenin and αN-catenin puncta densities, and 35% reduction in EphB2 puncta density. Its absence also resulted in 40% decreases in spine and excitatory synapse densities in the stratum radiatum of CA1, as determined by morphology, apposition of pre- and postsynaptic markers, and synaptic transmission. The remaining synapses appeared to function normally. Thus, afadin is a key intracellular signaling molecule for cadherin recruitment and is necessary for spine and synapse formation in vivo.
Keywords: Afadin, N-cadherin, synaptogenesis, STORM, glutamate receptors, bassoon, Nex-cre
Synapses are formed at contacts between neurons as a result of intercellular interactions that result in step-wise assembly of synaptic constituents (Jin and Garner, 2008; Waites et al., 2005). Adhesive interactions are early key events in synaptogenesis and appear to be required for synapse formation. Consistent with this, expression of several different cell adhesion molecules in heterologous cells can induce pre- or post-synaptic development in apposed neurons. Probably due to redundancy, however, in vertebrates genetic deletion of single adhesion molecules appear to have comparatively minor effects on synapse number in vivo.
Cadherins are a family of adhesion molecules that regulate many steps in neural development, including neurogenesis, neuronal migration, and spine and synapse formation (Takeichi, 2007). In Drosophila, absence of N-cadherin prevents normal synapse formation between photoreceptor axons and their targets (Clandinin and Feldheim, 2009). Probably because vertebrate neurons express multiple cadherins, the absence of single cadherins does not have dramatic effects on synapse formation (Takeichi, 2007).
In epithelial cells, cadherin localization and activation are strongly promoted by a family of Ig superfamily proteins named nectins (Takai et al., 2008). The nectins associate with the cadherin complex through the adaptor protein afadin, which binds nectins and two cadherin-associated proteins, p120-catenin and α-catenin. Afadin provides an essential link between nectins and the cadherin complex and promotes cadherin clustering and activity, thereby regulating adherens junction formation and stability. Both in vitro and in vivo observations indicate that absence of afadin impairs cadherin functions (Takai et al., 2008). Importantly, the PDZ domain of afadin binds several EphB receptors and neurexins, which each promote synapse formation in vitro (Buchert et al., 1999; Dalva et al., 2007; Hock et al., 1998). Thus, afadin may promote synapse formation through promoting association of cadherins with several proteins implicated in synapse formation.
Conventional afadin mutants die at E10 with deficits in epithelial cell adhesion and polarity (Ikeda et al., 1999; Zhadanov et al., 1999). Thus, we generated a conditional allele of afadin in order to characterize its roles in the nervous system. By limiting deletion of afadin to excitatory neurons we were able to characterize this gene’s function in neuronal differentiation. Results demonstrate that afadin’s absence results in a striking reduction in excitatory synaptic density without obvious effects on the morphology or function of the remaining synapses in CA1. Absence of afadin reduces the density and intensity of cadherin- and catenin-containing puncta without reducing overall cadherin or catenin levels. Additionally, loss of afadin caused a reduction in EphB2 puncta density consistent with the loss of synapses. Thus, afadin is a key regulator of excitatory synapse number in vivo and may control synapse density, in part, through regulating cadherin localization.
Generation of Nex-cre; afadin floxed mice
A 13.5 kb HindIII fragment was retrieved from an SVJ129 BAC by gap repair of pCRII-topo vector containing two 500 bp fragments homologous to the 5’ and 3’ ends of the retrieved fragment. The 5’ loxP site and a HindIII site was incorporated upstream of exon two by PCR and cloned upstream of a flpE-site flanked PGK-Neomycin with a 3’ loxP site (Fig. 1). The 5’ homology arm was cloned as a XmnI-EcoRI fragment upstream of the lone 5’ loxP site. The 3’ homology arm was cloned as a XbaI-ApaI fragment next to a PGK-diptheria toxin A expression cassette. The 5’ homology arm, floxed exon 2, and PGK-neo cassette was cloned into the vector containing the 3’ homology arm and PGK-dtA cassette by selecting for ampicillin and kanamycin resistance. The resulting plasmid was linearized upstream of the 5’ homology arm and electroporated into the feederless mouse embryonic stem cell line, E14. After several days, transfected cells were selected by treatment with G418. Isolated colonies were selected, expanded and screened by southern blotting HindIII digested genomic DNA. Two clones were expanded and rescreened before injection into C57Bl6/J. Both ES cell lines were incorporated in the germline and produced fertile, chimeric males. Southern blotting HindIII-digested genomic DNA was used to confirm homologous recombination of the afadin locus in mice. Genotyping of the neo line used a 5’ primer specific to the wild type locus (Primer 1: 5’-CCT TGG GAA CAA CAG GAC ACC-3’), a 5’ primer that anneals in the neomycin cassette (Primer 3: 5’-TTG CGG AAC CCT TCG AAG TTC-3’), and a common 3’ primer that anneals in the wild type locus (Primer 2: 5’-TCA GTA CAG GGG AAC ACC AGG G-3’). Primers 1 and 2 detect the wild type allele and produce a 188bp band by PCR. Primers 2 and 3 detect the targeted locus and produce a 296bp fragment by PCR. To generate the flox allele, the neo mice were crossed to β-actin-flp recombinase mice to remove the neomycin cassette (Rodriguez et al., 2000). Genotyping for the flox allele using primers 1 and 2, which anneal in the wild type genomic DNA, but which now produces a 315bp band by PCR. Loss of the neomycin expression cassette was confirmed by PCR, by showing a lack of product with primers 2 and 3 and a band of the correct size with primers 1 and 2. Nex-cre; afadinF/F mutants were generated by mating with Nex-cre mice (Goebbels et al., 2006).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Creation of a conditional null allele of afadin (mllt-4)
Western Blotting
Hippocampi were dissected, placed in micocentrifuge tubes, frozen in a dry ice and ethanol slurry and stored at −80°C till later use. Frozen tissue was homogenized with an Ultra-Turrax T25 disperser (IKA Works, Inc.) in a modified RIPA buffer (150mM sodium chloride, 50mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10% Glycerol, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA with addition on the day of use: 1mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium fluoride and Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Applied Science) and addition of 1mM PMSF just before homogenization). The tissue was fully solubilized as centrifuging for 15 minutes at 15,000 rpm yielded no visible pellet. Protein concentration was quantified by use of a protein assay kit (MicroBCA protein assay kit, Pierce) following manufacturer instructions. 22.5 µg of each protein lysate was fractionated by SDS-page and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was stained for total protein using SyPro Ruby protein blot stain (Lonza Rockland, Inc.) according to a manufacturer-provided protocol and imaged using a fluorescent imager (FLA-2000, Fujifilm). The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-AF6 (anti-afadin) (1:500, BD transduction labs), rabbit anti-pan-Cadherin (1:1000, Sigma), mouse anti-N-Cadherin (1:100, 13A9 cell supernatant kindly provided by Margaret Wheelock), mouse anti-β-catenin (1:1000, zymed), mouse anti-p120 (1:4000, BD transduction labs), rat anti-αN-catenin (1:1000, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), mouse anti-β-tubulin (mABE7) (1:1000, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), goat anti-nectin-1 (1:1000, SCBT), rabbit anti-nectin-3 (1:300, SCBT) and rabbit anti-EphB2 (1:100, Dr. Iryna Ethell, UC-Riverside). Species-specific secondary antibodies tagged with alkaline phosphatase (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, Inc.) were used to detect primary antibodies. The blots were developed with ECF (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes) according to manufacturer guidelines and imaged with a fluorescent imager (FLA-2000, Fujifilm). For western blotting EphB2, a horseradish peroxidase linked anti-rabbit secondary was used with ECL (GE LifeSciences) and exposed to film. The film was scanned and analyed. All quantifications were done in ImageGuage (Fuji) and analysis was done with Microsoft Excel.
Fluorescence and Immunofluorescence
Animals were perfused intracardially in succession with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The dissected brains were post-fixed for 2 hours and for immunofluorescence procedures cryopreserved in a series of 10%, 20%, and 30% sucrose in PBS. The brains were trimmed for coronal sectioning, mixed with OCT compound (TissueTek) for several hours to overnight, and frozen on dry ice. Brains were cut into 20 µm sections with a cryostat (Jung Frigocut 2800N, Leica Microsystems), collected serially onto glass slides, and stored at −80°C. A selection of slides from each brain was Nissl-stained with cresyl violet to match slides between animals along the rostral-caudal axis of the hippocampus. Blocking buffer (5% normal donkey or goat serum, 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS) was used throughout the staining procedure. The following primary antibodies were applied overnight: rabbit anti-l/s-afadin (1:1000, Sigma), goat anti-N-cadherin (1:100, Santz Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-β-catenin (1:1000, zymed), rat anti-αN-catenin (1:100, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-nectin-1 (1:100, SCBT), goat anti-nectin-3 (1:100, SCBT) or rabbit anti-EphB2 (1:100, Dr. Iryna Ethell, UC-Riverside). Sections were washed in blocking buffer, stained with secondary antibodies made in donkey or goat (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes), again washed in blocking buffer, and then stained with Sytox Blue (1:1000, Invitrogen Molecular Probes) in PBS for 15 minutes. All images were taken with an LSM-Pascal (Zeiss) using a 40× Plan-Apochromat, 63× Plan-Apochromat or a 100× Plan-Apochromat objective. Image analysis and quantification were performed in ImageJ, with results prepared in Microsoft Excel, and figures assembled in Adobe Photoshop. Puncta analysis was based upon finding local maxima, using the “Find Maxima…” function, rather than setting an absolute threshold, thereby allowing for comparison of integrated density. Specifically, we used the “Maxima Within Tolerance” setting with the same noise level, chosen to prevent fusing multiple puncta together, applied to all images. Finally, this thresholded image was used to mask the original image and this masked image was analyzed with the “Analyze Particles…” function by setting a threshold of 1. For images with significant puncta density, we set a threshold at the average peak fluorescence value, with the same setting used for all images, and used the “Find Maxima…” function with Segmented Particles setting above the threshold.
Details of the Scholl analysis are listed below in the Golgi section. For dendritic branching analysis, a Nex-cre; afadinF/F mouse was crossed to a Thy1-YFP line H; afadinF/F mouse to produce mutants and controls carrying the Thy-YFP transgene (Feng et al., 2000). Pyramidal cells of the hippocampus usually extend an apical branch through the SR bifurcating once before reaching the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM). Semaphorin 3A was shown to regulate dendritic branching through examination of this bifurcation of the apical branch, using the marker line Thy1-YFP (Schlomann et al., 2009). Animals were perfused as listed above, but after post-fixing the brains were transferred to PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and stored in the dark at 4° C until sectioned. The brains were sectioned sagitally at 150 µm with a vibratome (VT-1000, Leica Microsystems). A few medial sections were dehydrated in a series of increasing ethanol concentration (50%, 70%, 95%, 100%, and 100%) and cleared with drop-wise addition of methylsalicylate until the ethanol evaporated. The endogenous GFP fluorescence in the sections was imaged through the full thickness of the tissue with a LSM Pascal using a 40× PlanApochromat objective. Using ImageJ, the position of the first branch-point of the apical dendrite within the stratum radiatum was measured relative to the thickness of the stratum radiatum at that point. To aid in identification of this branch-point in the z-stack, the z-stack was depth-coded by color and then maximally z-projected for either the entire stack or several sections of the stack at a time. The results were averaged and compared using Microsoft Excel.
For STORM, sections were subjected to heat induced antigen retrieval: 10 minutes in pH 6.25, 10 mM Sodium Citrate at 90–94° C. Sections were blocked and incubated overnight with mouse anti-bassoon (1:200, StressGen), rabbit anti-glutamate receptor 1 (1:200, Chemicon) and rabbit anti-glutamate receptor 2 (1:200, Chemicon) in 3% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. Sections were washed and incubated in donkey anti-mouse dual-labeled with Alexa Fluor 405 and Alexa Fluor 647, and donkey anti-rabbit dual-labeled with Cy3 and Alexa Fluor 647 (unlabeled secondary antibody from Jackson ImmunoResearch).
STORM image acquisition and analysis
All sections were mounted in buffer containing PBS, 1 M mercaptoethylamine (pH 8.5), 50% glucose in MilliQ water and oxygen scavenging solution (10 mg of glucose oxidase, 25 µl of catalase in 100 µl PBS) in the ratio of 80:10:10:1. STORM setup and image acquisition were similar to prior descriptions (Dani et al., 2010), but only two-dimensional imaging was performed. Briefly, images were acquired using a STORM microscope built from a Nikon Eclipse Ti-E inverted microscope with a perfect-focusing system. The microscope was fitted with two activation lasers [405 nm, Stradus 405, Vortran; 561 nm, Sapphire 561-200-CW, Coherent) and one imaging laser (642 nm, Stradus 642, Vortran). The laser beams were aligned and the expanded, collimated beams were focused at the back focal plane of the 100X Plan Apo VC NA 1.4 objective (Nikon). A quad pass dichroic (ZT405/488/561/640RPC, Chroma) and a band pass filter (ET705/70m, Chroma) separated the emission from excitation light. Images were recorded with an EMCCD camera (Ixon DU897E-CS0-BV, Andor).
The region of interest was identified by observing the slide at low-magnification (using a 10X objective) and under dark field mode. Two color STORM data was acquired after switching to 100X objective and then performing imaging at 60 Hz with one frame of illumination with activation lasers (405 nm for Alexa 405–647 or 561 nm for Cy3-647) alternating with three frames of illumination with imaging laser (642 nm) (Dani et al., 2010). The focus on the slide was determined and the out of focus signal was reduced by illuminating with imaging laser (642 nm) and deactivating the fluorophores in the samples above and below the focal plane. STORM movie of 40000–50000 frames was acquired at constant powers for activation (1–5 µW) and imaging laser (30 mW).
STORM analysis was performed using custom software. Two color imaging, correction to the sample drift in the lateral direction during acquisition, and subtraction of the crosstalk between the two imaging channels were done using algorithms described previously (Dani et al., 2010). The high resolution images were exported as pictures with 50 nm size pixels by counting the number of localization points in each pixel and were further analyzed by a custom written macro in ImageJ, entitled “Synaptic Co-Localization- STORM”. The macro identifies and analyzes synapses by finding apposing pre-and post-synaptic puncta of sufficient size and signal intensity, automatically and objectively processing all images with the same settings. The macro is to be submitted to the ImageJ website simultaneously with publication.
Golgi Staining
Golgi staining was performed using a rapid Golgi-Cox kit (FD Neurotechnologies) on freshly dissected brain trimmed to include only the forebrain. The protocol was followed in detail, though the following specifics are lacking from the protocol. The tissue was incubated in solution AB for 2 weeks. The tissue was embedded in Tissue Freezing Medium (Triangle Biomedical Sciences) and frozen in a bath of dry ice and isopentane. The tissue was sectioned into 100 µm sections in a cryostat at −22°C. The sections were dried for 3–4 days post-sectioning. The sections were protected from light during all stages of the procedure. For counting spines, the sections were imaged with a Zeiss Axiovert 200M using a 63X LCI Plan-Neofluar objective in glycerol mode, using a 1.6× optovar and images were collected as a Z-stack using Slidebook software (Intelligent Imaging Inovations). For increased resolution, images were collected using a Nikon E600 with a 60× Plan Apo water immersion objective by a Zeiss AxioCam HRc and Axiovision software.
For Scholl analysis, the full thickness of the Golgi-stained section was imaged by confocal reflectance using an LSM Pascal with a 20× Plan NeoFluar objective. In brief, the confocal was set to illuminate the section with the 458 nm laser line, which gives the best z-resolution, and to collect the same wavelength. The resulting z-stack was analyzed in Imaris (Bitplane) to trace apical dendrites of individual pyramidal neurons and to compute the Scholl analysis in three dimensions. Microsoft Excel was used for collating and analyzing the results.
Electron Microscopy
Mice were perfused transcardially with 0.9% sodium chloride, followed by fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde and 1% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4). Brains were post-fixed for overnight and cut into thick 100 µm sections with a vibratome. Sections were trimmed to include CA1, CA3 and the dentate gyrus to allow for identification of a similar region in the electron microscope. The sections were dehydrated, fixed in osmium tetroxide, and embedded in Epon-Araldite. Semithin sections were cut and stained with toluidine blue to ensure proper orientation of the tissue block. Ultrathin sections were cut and stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate. Sections were imaged and photographed using the electron microscope core in the UCSF Department of Anatomy. Specifically, images were taken at random within CA1-SR dorsal to the dentate gyrus, approximately two times the thickness of the SP from the SP. 8 films, corresponding to 512 µm2, were scanned and further analyzed in ImageJ. Specifically, synapses were identified by apposition of a post-synaptic density and a presynaptic bouton with at least 4 synaptic vesicles. At least 110 synapses were identified in each animal. Shaft synapses were distinguished by the presence of microtubules and as appearing on a large diameter fiber. The PSD was directly measured on all identified synapses. The bouton was outlined and measured as the region of the enlarged axon with synaptic vesicles and cytoplasmic material with limited microtubules. Bouton analysis was done using the synapses from four micrographs and at least 50 synapses per animal.
Electrophysiology
Transverse hippocampal slices were prepared from control and mutant littermate mice of either sex, 5–7 weeks of age. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and the whole brain was removed and transferred into ice-cold cutting solution containing: 75 mM sucrose, 87 mM NaCl, 25 mM glucose, 25 mM NaHCO3, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 7 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM CaCl2, equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2. The brain was glued onto the stage of a vibratome slicer, and 450 µm slices were cut and then allowed to recover for at least 1 hr at 34°C in an incubation chamber with artificial cerebral spinal fluid (ACSF) containing: 125 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, and 25 mM glucose, equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2. Recordings were performed in a submerged bath recording chamber continuously superfused with ACSF at a flow rate of 2 ml/min at 32–34°C using a MultiClamp 700A amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and pClamp acquisition software. Field EPSPs were evoked with a bipolar platinum stimulating electrode (FHC) placed to stimulate Schaffer collateral afferents, and were detected using glass electrodes filled with 2 M NaCl placed in the CA1 stratum radiatum ~50–100 µm away for the stimulation site. fEPSP were evoked with electrical pulses of duration 100 µs and amplitude 15–70 µA delivered at inter sweep intervals of 0.067 Hz. Data were acquired at 10 kHz using pClamp 10.2 (Molecular Devices) and filtered at 2 kHz and analyzed using Clampfit software (Molecular Devices).
Conditional loss of afadin in hippocampal pyramidal neurons
To address the role of afadin in neuronal morphogenesis and synaptogenesis, we generated a conditional allele of afadin (mllt-4) in which loxP sites surround exon 2 (Fig. 1A, B). Cre-mediated deletion of exon 2 results in a frameshift and premature stop codon within exon 3 that should result in mRNA destabilization (Mendell et al., 2004). Additionally, exon 2 encodes part of the first Ras association domain, essential for afadin function, that is present in all known afadin isoforms (Takai et al., 2008). Both the Neo and flox allele homozygotes were viable and did not detectably reduce afadin expression (Figure 1E and not shown). The flox allele of afadin was used for further studies (Fig. 1A).
For this study, the afadin flox allele was crossed with the forebrain-specific Nex-cre knockin (Goebbels et al., 2006). This cre line promotes efficient recombination in excitatory post-mitotic neurons and intermediate neural progenitors in the cortex and hippocampus, but not neural epithelial cells or astroglia (Goebbels et al., 2006; Mulder et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2005). Due to the heterogeneity of synapses in the cortex, we focused on the hippocampus, examining the synapses formed by CA3 pyramidal cells onto CA1 pyramidal cells in the stratum radiatum (CA1-SR). Western blot analysis of adult hippocampal extracts demonstrated a four-fold reduction in afadin in the mutant (Fig. 2A, B). The remaining expression likely reflects afadin expression in glia, inhibitory neurons and endothelia. By immunofluorescence, we observed substantial loss of afadin expression in the mutant CA1-SR, with some expression remaining in the stratum pyramidale (CA1-SP) (Fig 2C–D).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Afadin Expression is reduced in the hippocampus following Nex-Cre-mediated deletion
Loss of afadin impairs N-cadherin, β-catenin and αN-catenin clustering
To determine whether absence of afadin results in impaired cadherin localization within the CA1 hippocampus, we examined N-cadherin localization by immunofluorescence in control and mutant (Fig. 3A, B) sections. Quantification of N-cadherin puncta density indicated that the mutant contained only 30% of the puncta present in the control (Fig. 3C). Although the remaining mutant puncta appeared normal in area (Fig. 3D), the average total fluorescence intensity within each puncta was reduced by 30% in the mutant (Fig. 3E). To determine whether the reductions in N-cadherin puncta density were accompanied by similar reductions in the densities of cadherin-associated proteins, we also examined and quantified the densities of β-catenin and αN-catenin puncta. Results, presented in Figs. 3F–O, show that absence of afadin resulted in loss of approximately 2/3rds of the β-catenin puncta and 60% of the αN-catenin. As one potential explanation for this data would be reduced expression of these proteins, we also determined whether cadherin and catenin protein levels were altered in the mutant by protein blot (Fig. 3P). Results indicate that absence of afadin did not alter the total expression levels of N-cadherin, total cadherins, α-N-catenin, β-catenin or p120-catenin (Fig. 3Q). Thus, absence of afadin results in reduced clustering of N-cadherin, β-catenin and αN-catenin without affecting cadherin and catenin levels. The most likely explanation of these observations is that absence of afadin impairs formation of cadherin clusters that in turn results in reduced clustering of cytoplasmic cadherin-associated proteins.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Loss of afadin results in reduced N-cadherin puncta density without a change in total expression of cadherin, catenins, nectins or EphB2
Afadin is known to bind through its PDZ domain several cell surface receptors, including nectins and Eph receptors (Buchert et al., 1999; Takahashi et al., 1999), and nectins acting through afadin have been shown to strongly promote cadherin clustering and activation (Takai et al., 2008). Interestingly, when we examined the effects of afadin's absence on localization of nectin-1 or nectin-3, we observed little change in clustering of either protein (Fig. 4A–F), consistent with the likelihood that the nectins function upstream of afadin in controlling clustering of cadherins and catenins. In contrast, we did observe a significant reduction of 35% in EphB receptor puncta density (Fig. 4G–I). Additionally, we tested the expression level of Nectin-1, Nectin-3 and EphB2 in hippocampal lysates of controls and mutants (Fig. 4J). We observed that absence of afadin did not alter total expression levels of any of these three proteins (Fig. 4K).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Loss of afadin results in reduced EphB2 puncta density without a change in Nectin-1 or -3 puncta density or total expression of nectins and EphB2
Altered Lamination but normal Dendritic development in mutant CA1
Cadherins regulate cell sorting and migration (Takeichi, 2007, 2011). Additionally, loss of αN-catenin results in mislocalization and dispersion of CA1 and 3 pyramidal cells (Park et al., 2002). While hippocampal lamination was not perturbed (data not shown), a small number of CA1 pyramidal cell bodies were mislocalized to the stratum oriens (10%) or SR (5%) in the mutant compared to virtually no mislocalization in controls (Fig. 5). Nonetheless, dendrite development appeared comparatively normal. We observed no difference in the location of the first apical branch of pyramidal cells in the mutant (Fig. 6A–C). Using Scholl analysis, we found no difference in the dendritic length or pattern of branching within the SR (Fig. 6D). In addition, we found no obvious change in the dendritic branching patterns of the misplaced pyramidal cells. In summary, despite prior in vitro studies suggesting roles for the catenins and N-cadherin in regulating dendritic growth, dendrites appear comparatively normal in the afadin mutant (Takeichi, 2007).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Localization of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells following Nex-Cre-mediated deletion of afadin
Figure 6
Figure 6
Analysis of dendritic branching in the Nex-cre;afadin mutant
Spine density is reduced in afadin mutant hippocampus
As most excitatory synapses are localized on spines, synapse number can be altered as a result of changes in spine number, as is observed in compound EphB null mice (Kayser et al., 2006). Additionally, cadherins and catenins have been implicated in spine morphogenesis in vivo and in vitro (Takeichi, 2007). To examine the role of afadin in regulating spine formation by CA1 pyramidal neurons, we used Golgi analysis to visualize and quantify their dendritic spines in the CA1-SR of controls and mutants (Fig. 7A, B). Interestingly, the afadin null pyramidal neurons exhibited a 43% decrease in spine density (Fig. 7C). The reduced density of spines may be a consequence of the 70% reduction in cadherin puncta density, since substantial prior work in vitro has implicated cadherins, especially N-cadherin, in spine formation and stability (Takeichi, 2007).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Reduced spine density on pyramidal cell dendrites in CA1 SR in the afadin mutant
Ultrastructural analysis of excitatory synapses in the SR of the afadin mutant
To determine whether afadin's absence results in reduced synapse density, we quantified CA1-SR synapse density by EM. Synapses were identified as having a presynaptic density plus synaptic vesicles juxtaposed to a postsynaptic density (PSD) (Fig. 8A–D). Few inhibitory synapses, identified by PSD appearance, were observed. We observed a 31% lower density of excitatory synapses in the mutant (22.9+/−2.7/100 µm2) vs. control (33.3+/−3.5/100 µm2) (Fig. 8E). We also observed a 30% increase in average presynaptic terminal area in the mutant compared to control (Fig. 8F), consistent with synaptophysin puncta area quantification by immunofluorescence (data not shown). We detected no increase in the number of split PSD's (Fig. 8G) or changes in PSD length in the mutant (Fig 8H)., suggesting postsynaptic structure is normal in the mutant In summary, the 43% reduction in spine density correlated well with a similar reduction of 31% in the density of excitatory synapses in the afadin mutant.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Reduced synapse density in CA1 SR in the afadin mutant
Loss of afadin results in reductions in pre-and postsynaptic protein co-localization
To further address the role of afadin in regulating synaptic structure, we initially quantified the densities of puncta from synapse-associated proteins, synaptophysin, bassoon and glutamate receptors, by immunofluorescence and confocal imaging (data not shown). Surprisingly, we did not observe a puncta density reduction in the mutant, most likely due to the limited spatial resolution of confocal microscopy. To extend this analysis, we used sub-diffraction limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) to determine synapse density, defining synapses as apposed clusters of pre-synaptic bassoon and post-synaptic AMPA glutamate receptors (GluR1/2) (Dani et al., 2010). Consistent with 3D-reconstructive EM, control mice had an average of 2.4 synapses/µm3 (Mishchenko et al., 2010). In contrast, mutants had a 35% reduction in synapse density (Fig. 9A–D). Intriguingly, while mutants had a 35% reduction in the density of bassoon puncta, there was no significant reduction in the density of AMPA glutamate receptor 1/2 puncta (Fig. 9E–H). Consistent with data presented above suggesting that the remaining synapses are normal, the average size and intensity of bassoon puncta were not altered in the mutant (Fig. 9I–J), nor was the average amount of AMPA glutamate receptor 1/2 at synapses changed (Fig. 9L).
Figure 9
Figure 9
STORM demonstrates loss of synapses in mutants
Reduced synaptic transmission in afadin mutant hippocampus
To determine if afadin’s absence from CA3 and CA1 neurons resulted in synaptic transmission deficits, we examined the field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) responses. CA1-SR basal synaptic transmission was assessed by stimulating Schaffer collateral afferents with increasing intensity and measuring the rise slope of the fEPSP in control (Fig. 10A) and mutant (Fig. 10B). The input-output linear fit of the fiber volley amplitude to the fEPSP rise slope demonstrated a nearly two-fold decrease in synaptic strength in afadin mutants (Fig. 10C, D). While consistent with the loss of synapses shown by EM and STORM, reduced Schaffer collateral innervation of CA1 could also explain this observation. To determine this, we plotted the evoked fiber volley amplitude as a function of stimulus intensity (Fig. 10E) and found no difference, indicating that mutants have normal numbers of Schaffer collateral axons that innervate CA1.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Reduced excitatory synaptic transmission in the mutant hippocampus
We further characterized synaptic transmission using a series of evoked stimulus protocols. To check for changes in presynaptic release probability by the afadin-deficient CA3 presynaptic neurons, we measured the paired-pulse ratio at varying stimulus intervals (Fig. 10F) (Zucker, 1989). We found no change in paired-pulse facilitation at any interval (Fig. 10G), suggesting that the probability of release is normal in the afadin mutant. To determine whether absence of afadin affects the size of the readily releasable pool (RRP), consequences of repetitive high frequency stimulation (Fig. 10H), capable of exhausting the RRP without allowing for replenishment from the reserve pool, was assessed. The ratio of the size of the 40th fEPSP to the 1st fEPSP was unchanged between genotypes, indicating that absence of afadin does not affect the size of the RRP. Lastly, we examined the consequences of repetitive low frequency stimulation to determine whether afadin's absence results in changes in the reserve pool. Likewise, this parameter was unchanged (Fig. 10I). Thus, we found no changes in the responses of the mutant CA3 presynaptic neurons, indicating that absence of afadin does not perturb presynaptic function. In summary, the electrophysiology data show reduced excitatory synaptic transmission in afadin mutants. These results indicate that the density of synapses formed by CA3 axons on CA1 dendrites is reduced in the mutant, a conclusion completely consistent with the lower synaptic density determined by EM and STORM.
By specifically deleting afadin in hippocampal excitatory neurons before synapse formation, we were able to examine the role of this scaffold protein in regulating neuronal differentiation in the presence of normal glia and other cells. Much of the differentiation of mutant hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons proceeded comparatively normally. A few neuronal cell bodies were mislocalized, but most were localized appropriately in the stratum pyramidale. Similarly, dendrite growth and branching appeared comparatively normal in the mutant neurons. Three significant phenotypes were observed in the mutant neurons. Spine formation was impaired because only 60% the normal density was observed in the mutant CA1 stratum radiatum. A similar reduction in density of excitatory synapses in the stratum radiatum was also observed. Finally, the mutants exhibited a dramatic loss of 70% of the N-cadherin puncta and similar reductions in the densities of β-catenin and αN-catenin puncta with no changes in total expression of either N-cadherin or these catenins, documenting afadin's role in cadherin recruitment. It seems likely that many of the residual cadherin and catenin puncta are expressed in cells not targeted by Nex-Cre. Notably, these synaptic deficits appear much more dramatic than that observed following targeted deletion of N-cadherin (Kadowaki et al., 2007). Those authors observed the continued presence of β-catenin at synapses, indicating that other classical cadherins remained at these synapses. Prior work has suggested that afadin promotes the recruitment and activation of all of the classical cadherins (Takai et al., 2008). Interestingly, we did not observe effects of afadin deletion on the density or properties of Nectin-1 and Nectin-3 puncta or on total expression levels of either nectin, consistent with the possibility that these proteins function upstream of afadin in controlling cadherin and catenin localization and function. In contrast, absence of afadin does result in mislocalization of nectins in the dentate gyrus and intestinal epithelium (Majima et al., 2009; Tanaka-Okamoto et al., 2011). The reason for this discrepancy is not clear, but suggests that there are cell type-specific mechanisms that control localization of the nectins, possibly involving other scaffold proteins, such as S-SCAM (Yamada et al., 2003). Overall, our data is consistent with the possibility that afadin promotes synapse formation/maintenance through recruitment of cadherins and catenins, but does not significantly perturb pre- or post-synaptic function.
In synaptic structure analyses, both light level immunofluorescence (not shown) and EM analysis detected a small but significant increase in the size of presynaptic nerve terminals in mutant compared to control CA3 neurons. Analyses of presynaptic function—probability of release and sizes of the readily-releasable and reserve vesicle pools—indicates that the mutant CA3 presynaptic nerve terminals functioned normally. Additionally, absence of afadin did not affect the average amount of bassoon associated with each synapse as determined by STORM. Similarly, postsynaptic morphology as assessed by appearance and length of the post-synaptic density appeared normal as assessed by EM and AMPA receptor GluR1/2 content at these synapses was normal as assessed by STORM. Quantification of CA3 fiber volley amplitude indicated that normal numbers of mutant CA3 pyramidal cell axons invaded the CA1 stratum radiatum. Postsynaptic responses were reduced by approximately the same percentage as the reductions in synapse density quantified by EM and STORM. Mutant synapses had similar number of glutamate receptors juxtaposed to bassoon. Perhaps, the increase in bouton size is an indirect result of fewer synapses and/or spines. Taken together, these analyses indicate that the synapses formed in the absence of afadin function normally.
These findings contrast with previous mouse genetic models for cadherin complex function, but comparisons are complicated by the presence of several functional homologues for the cadherins and catenins. Animals lacking N-cadherin clearly form CNS synapses in vitro, but synaptic density has not been quantified in this mutant in vivo and other cadherins almost certainly remain at these synapses (Kadowaki et al., 2007). Similarly, absence of αN-catenin does not prevent synapse formation in vivo although, similar to cadherin inhibition, this results in spine and synapse instability in culture (Abe et al., 2004; Park et al., 2002; Togashi et al., 2002). Absence of β-catenin results in a small increase in CA1 synapse density with a small, but significant deficit in the synaptic vesicle reserve pool (Bamji et al., 2003). Possible compensation of the αN-catenin and β-catenin mutants by other α-catenin family members and the β-catenin homologue plakoglobin were not examined in these studies. Mice with a targeted deletion of p120-catenin had reduced numbers of dendritic spines and synapses in CA1-SR, and a reduction in N-cadherin expression (Elia et al., 2006; Takeichi, 2007). In vitro analysis suggested that the loss of spines in this mutant is attributable to mis-regulation of Rac and Rho, while normal maturation of spines does require interactions of cadherins with p120-catenin (Elia et al., 2006; Ishiyama et al., 2010). In contrast, deletion of the p120-catenin homologue, δ-catenin results in deficits in synaptic transmission and plasticity without detectable alterations of synapse density (Israely et al., 2004). Importantly, absence of this gene also results in premature loss of synaptic transmission, synapses, spines and dendrites in the adult cortex (Matter et al., 2009). Considering these phenotypes, that of the p120-catenin mutant appears most similar to that of the afadin mutant, consistent with the role of p120-catenin in mediating an interaction between afadin and cadherins.
Through its PDZ domain, afadin also binds at least three other families of cell surface receptors, the nectins, EphB receptors and neurexins (Beaudoin, 2006) Interestingly, mice with triple mutants of neuroligin or α-neurexin have profoundly impaired synaptic transmission with only small alterations in numbers of inhibitory and excitatory synapses (Missler et al., 2003; Varoqueaux et al., 2006). In contrast, the triple EphB1/B2/B3 null mice exhibit an approximately 50% decrease in the density of spines in CA1 with a reduced number of spine and increased number of shaft synapses as well as striking reductions in spine maturation and post-synaptic compartment maturation (Henkemeyer et al., 2003). Thus, absence of afadin may impair EphB receptor function, as we found a reduction in EphB2 puncta density, but these receptors clearly have additional functions since the triple EphB receptor mutant has phenotypes not observed in the afadin mutant. In contrast to mutants lacking EphB receptors, neuroligins or α-neurexins, afadin appears to promote synapse density without having major effects on synapse structure or function.
This study focused on afadin because it lacks close structural homologues, thereby preventing compensation by other proteins. Nonetheless, a significant number of synapses form in its absence. As a possible explanation, a recent report raises the possibility that the PDZ-domain containing protein S-SCAM acts as a functional homologue of afadin through mediating association of N-cadherin with Neuroligin-1 (Stan et al., 2010). Additionally, recent studies also suggest that N-cadherin function can be promoted through extracellular interactions with nectin-2 and protocadherin-19 (Biswas et al., 2010; Morita et al., 2010). It is not clear whether the resulting stimulation of N-cadherin function depends upon afadin, p120-catenin or other members of the cadherin complex. Thus, other cytoplasmic scaffold and surface proteins may promote cadherin function in the absence of afadin.
Additional interactions of afadin may also promote synapse formation. For example its RA domain binds Rap1 (Takai et al., 2008). Previous studies in cortical cultures have provided evidence that afadin may function in a pathway through which NMDA receptors control spine maturation and AMPA receptor recruitment through Rap1 (Xie et al., 2005). Additionally, afadin may promote N-cadherin-dependent spine growth and Rac activation by recruiting the Rac-GEF, kalirin-7 (Xie et al., 2008). However, as loss of kalirin-7 causes no hippocampal spine or synaptic abnormalities, it is unlikely to underlie the defects seen in the afadin null hippocampus seen in our study (Cahill et al., 2009; Xie et al., 2011). Though as afadin interacts with N-cadherin and p120-catenin, misregulation or mislocalization of Rho family GTPases may still contribute to the reduction in spine density observed in the mutant in vivo.
In conclusion our data provide strong evidence that absence of afadin results in significant reductions in cadherin puncta, spine and excitatory synapse density in the CA1-SR without affecting function of those synapses, which are formed in its absence. The data suggest that impaired clustering and activity of cadherins contributes to the phenotypes observed following neuron-specific deletion of afadin. The results do not exclude possible additional contributions to the afadin mutant phenotype from mis-regulation of neurexin, EphB or nectin activity within the brain.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Reichardt lab members for discussions; JA Mercer, M. Wheelock, and KA Nave for reagents; the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for NCAT2 and E7 hybridomas. Work was supported by That Man May See (EMU), F32-MH079661 (GMJB), the UCSF Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research, Searle Scholarship, and Packard Fellowship (BH), and the Simons Foundation (EMU, LFR).
Footnotes
The authors declare there are no conflicts of interests.
  • Abe K, Chisaka O, Van Roy F, Takeichi M. Stability of dendritic spines and synaptic contacts is controlled by alpha N-catenin. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:357–363. [PubMed]
  • Bamji SX, Shimazu K, Kimes N, Huelsken J, Birchmeier W, Lu B, Reichardt LF. Role of beta-catenin in synaptic vesicle localization and presynaptic assembly. Neuron. 2003;40:719–731. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Beaudoin GM., 3rd Con-nectin axons and dendrites. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:7–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Biswas S, Emond MR, Jontes JD. Protocadherin-19 and N-cadherin interact to control cell movements during anterior neurulation. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:1029–1041. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Buchert M, Schneider S, Meskenaite V, Adams MT, Canaani E, Baechi T, Moelling K, Hovens CM. The junction-associated protein AF-6 interacts and clusters with specific Eph receptor tyrosine kinases at specialized sites of cell-cell contact in the brain. J Cell Biol. 1999;144:361–371. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cahill ME, Xie Z, Day M, Photowala H, Barbolina MV, Miller CA, Weiss C, Radulovic J, Sweatt JD, Disterhoft JF, et al. Kalirin regulates cortical spine morphogenesis and disease-related behavioral phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13058–13063. [PubMed]
  • Clandinin TR, Feldheim DA. Making a visual map: mechanisms and molecules. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009;19:174–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dalva MB, McClelland AC, Kayser MS. Cell adhesion molecules: signalling functions at the synapse. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:206–220. [PubMed]
  • Dani A, Huang B, Bergan J, Dulac C, Zhuang X. Superresolution imaging of chemical synapses in the brain. Neuron. 2010;68:843–856. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Elia LP, Yamamoto M, Zang K, Reichardt LF. p120 Catenin Regulates Dendritic Spine and Synapse Development through Rho-Family GTPases and Cadherins. Neuron. 2006;51:43–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, Nerbonne JM, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron. 2000;28:41–51. [PubMed]
  • Goebbels S, Bormuth I, Bode U, Hermanson O, Schwab MH, Nave KA. Genetic targeting of principal neurons in neocortex and hippocampus of NEX-Cre mice. Genesis. 2006;44:611–621. [PubMed]
  • Henkemeyer M, Itkis OS, Ngo M, Hickmott PW, Ethell IM. Multiple EphB receptor tyrosine kinases shape dendritic spines in the hippocampus. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:1313–1326. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hock B, Bohme B, Karn T, Yamamoto T, Kaibuchi K, Holtrich U, Holland S, Pawson T, Rubsamen-Waigmann H, Strebhardt K. PDZ-domain-mediated interaction of the Eph-related receptor tyrosine kinase EphB3 and the ras-binding protein AF6 depends on the kinase activity of the receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:9779–9784. [PubMed]
  • Ikeda W, Nakanishi H, Miyoshi J, Mandai K, Ishizaki H, Tanaka M, Togawa A, Takahashi K, Nishioka H, Yoshida H, et al. Afadin: A key molecule essential for structural organization of cell-cell junctions of polarized epithelia during embryogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:1117–1132. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ishiyama N, Lee SH, Liu S, Li GY, Smith MJ, Reichardt LF, Ikura M. Dynamic and static interactions between p120 catenin and E-cadherin regulate the stability of cell-cell adhesion. Cell. 2010;141:117–128. [PubMed]
  • Israely I, Costa RM, Xie CW, Silva AJ, Kosik KS, Liu X. Deletion of the neuron-specific protein delta-catenin leads to severe cognitive and synaptic dysfunction. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1657–1663. [PubMed]
  • Jin Y, Garner CC. Molecular mechanisms of presynaptic differentiation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008;24:237–262. [PubMed]
  • Kadowaki M, Nakamura S, Machon O, Krauss S, Radice GL, Takeichi M. N-cadherin mediates cortical organization in the mouse brain. Dev Biol. 2007;304:22–33. [PubMed]
  • Kayser MS, McClelland AC, Hughes EG, Dalva MB. Intracellular and trans-synaptic regulation of glutamatergic synaptogenesis by EphB receptors. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12152–12164. [PubMed]
  • Majima T, Ogita H, Yamada T, Amano H, Togashi H, Sakisaka T, Tanaka-Okamoto M, Ishizaki H, Miyoshi J, Takai Y. Involvement of afadin in the formation and remodeling of synapses in the hippocampus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;385:539–544. [PubMed]
  • Matter C, Pribadi M, Liu X, Trachtenberg JT. Delta-catenin is required for the maintenance of neural structure and function in mature cortex in vivo. Neuron. 2009;64:320–327. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mendell JT, Sharifi NA, Meyers JL, Martinez-Murillo F, Dietz HC. Nonsense surveillance regulates expression of diverse classes of mammalian transcripts and mutes genomic noise. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1073–1078. [PubMed]
  • Mishchenko Y, Hu T, Spacek J, Mendenhall J, Harris KM, Chklovskii DB. Ultrastructural analysis of hippocampal neuropil from the connectomics perspective. Neuron. 2010;67:1009–1020. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Missler M, Zhang W, Rohlmann A, Kattenstroth G, Hammer RE, Gottmann K, Sudhof TC. Alpha-neurexins couple Ca2+ channels to synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Nature. 2003;423:939–948. [PubMed]
  • Morita H, Nandadasa S, Yamamoto TS, Terasaka-Iioka C, Wylie C, Ueno N. Nectin-2 and N-cadherin interact through extracellular domains and induce apical accumulation of F-actin in apical constriction of Xenopus neural tube morphogenesis. Development. 2010;137:1315–1325. [PubMed]
  • Mulder J, Aguado T, Keimpema E, Barabas K, Ballester Rosado CJ, Nguyen L, Monory K, Marsicano G, Di Marzo V, Hurd YL, et al. Endocannabinoid signaling controls pyramidal cell specification and long-range axon patterning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:8760–8765. [PubMed]
  • Park C, Falls W, Finger JH, Longo-Guess CM, Ackerman SL. Deletion in Catna2, encoding alpha N-catenin, causes cerebellar and hippocampal lamination defects and impaired startle modulation. Nat Genet. 2002;31:279–284. [PubMed]
  • Rodriguez CI, Buchholz F, Galloway J, Sequerra R, Kasper J, Ayala R, Stewart AF, Dymecki SM. High-efficiency deleter mice show that FLPe is an alternative to Cre-loxP. Nat Genet. 2000;25:139–140. [PubMed]
  • Schlomann U, Schwamborn JC, Muller M, Fassler R, Puschel AW. The stimulation of dendrite growth by Sema3A requires integrin engagement and focal adhesion kinase. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:2034–2042. [PubMed]
  • Stan A, Pielarski KN, Brigadski T, Wittenmayer N, Fedorchenko O, Gohla A, Lessmann V, Dresbach T, Gottmann K. Essential cooperation of N-cadherin and neuroligin-1 in the transsynaptic control of vesicle accumulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:11116–11121. [PubMed]
  • Takahashi K, Nakanishi H, Miyahara M, Mandai K, Satoh K, Satoh A, Nishioka H, Aoki J, Nomoto A, Mizoguchi A, et al. Nectin/PRR: an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule recruited to cadherin-based adherens junctions through interaction with Afadin, a PDZ domain-containing protein. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:539–549. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Takai Y, Ikeda W, Ogita H, Rikitake Y. The immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule nectin and its associated protein afadin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008;24:309–342. [PubMed]
  • Takeichi M. The cadherin superfamily in neuronal connections and interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:11–20. [PubMed]
  • Takeichi M. Self-organization of animal tissues: cadherin-mediated processes. Dev Cell. 2011;21:24–26. [PubMed]
  • Tanaka-Okamoto M, Hori K, Ishizaki H, Itoh Y, Onishi S, Yonemura S, Takai Y, Miyoshi J. Involvement of afadin in barrier function and homeostasis of mouse intestinal epithelia. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:2231–2240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Togashi H, Abe K, Mizoguchi A, Takaoka K, Chisaka O, Takeichi M. Cadherin regulates dendritic spine morphogenesis. Neuron. 2002;35:77–89. [PubMed]
  • Varoqueaux F, Aramuni G, Rawson RL, Mohrmann R, Missler M, Gottmann K, Zhang W, Sudhof TC, Brose N. Neuroligins determine synapse maturation and function. Neuron. 2006;51:741–754. [PubMed]
  • Waites CL, Craig AM, Garner CC. Mechanisms of vertebrate synaptogenesis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:251–274. [PubMed]
  • Wu SX, Goebbels S, Nakamura K, Nakamura K, Kometani K, Minato N, Kaneko T, Nave KA, Tamamaki N. Pyramidal neurons of upper cortical layers generated by NEX-positive progenitor cells in the subventricular zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:17172–17177. [PubMed]
  • Xie Z, Cahill ME, Radulovic J, Wang J, Campbell SL, Miller CA, Sweatt JD, Penzes P. Hippocampal phenotypes in kalirin-deficient mice. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011;46:45–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Xie Z, Huganir RL, Penzes P. Activity-dependent dendritic spine structural plasticity is regulated by small GTPase Rap1 and its target AF-6. Neuron. 2005;48:605–618. [PubMed]
  • Xie Z, Photowala H, Cahill ME, Srivastava DP, Woolfrey KM, Shum CY, Huganir RL, Penzes P. Coordination of synaptic adhesion with dendritic spine remodeling by AF-6 and kalirin-7. J Neurosci. 2008;28:6079–6091. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yamada A, Irie K, Deguchi-Tawarada M, Ohtsuka T, Takai Y. Nectin-dependent localization of synaptic scaffolding molecule (S-SCAM) at the puncta adherentia junctions formed between the mossy fibre terminals and the dendrites of pyramidal cells in the CA3 area of the mouse hippocampus. Genes Cells. 2003;8:985–994. [PubMed]
  • Zhadanov AB, Provance DW, Jr, Speer CA, Coffin JD, Goss D, Blixt JA, Reichert CM, Mercer JA. Absence of the tight junctional protein AF-6 disrupts epithelial cell-cell junctions and cell polarity during mouse development. Curr Biol. 1999;9:880–888. [PubMed]
  • Zucker RS. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:13–31. [PubMed]