SUA levels were normally distributed in both males (N=563) and females (N=737) and the mean levels were significant higher in males (361.0±79.19 μmol/L) than females (265.4±77.65 μmol/L), though Bartlett's and Fligner's tests revealed no significant gender-based differences in SUA variance. Regression analysis indicated that SUA levels were significantly associated with age in both genders and the association was more significant in females. SUA change per year in females was 1.797 μmol/L (
P=2.2×10
−24,
r2=13.1%) and in males was 0.786 μmol/L (
P=0.00019,
r2=2.28%) (
Supplementary Figure S1).
As anticipated from the relatedness among the samples, the test statistics were inflated compared to the null distribution with an estimated inflation factor λ=1.20. As shown in the quantile-quantile (QQ) plot (
Supplementary Figure S2), after adjustment for this inflation factor and exclusion of significant SNPs in the
SLC2A9 region the test statistics fit well with the expected values, indicating appropriate control of false positive rate.
A Manhattan plot of the genome-wide association signals () shows the strongest association around the
SLC2A9 gene, a well-established uric acid-associated gene. The significant region spans roughly 650kb and covers the
SLC2A9 and the
WDR1 genes (). This region is delimited by two recombination hot spots with local recombination rate >25cM/Mb. One-hundred and sixteen SNPs with
P-value less than the genome-wide significant level (5×10
−8) were identified within this region. The strongest signal was found on the imputed SNP rs13129697 (
P=2.33×10
−19); the minor allele was associated with an average SUA decrease of 28.99μmol/L. Consistent with previous studies, the effect size estimate showed substantial gender difference with 35.76μmol/L (
P=2.11×10
−19) in females and 19.58 μmol/L (
P=5.40×10
−5) in males. This pattern was similar across all of the 116 SNPs that reached genome-wide significance. Of interest is a non-synonymous SNP, rs16890979 (
P=2.24×10
−17), also reported previously with genome-wide significance (
Dehghan et al. 2008;
McArdle et al. 2008). Re-analysis of the region, conditional on either rs13129697 or rs16890979 failed to completely abolish the signals of the other SNPs with the smallest conditional
P~1.7×10
−3 (data not shown) suggesting the possibility of multiple functional variants within the region.
In addition to the well-established
SLC2A9 region, five other potentially significant regions () were identified with at least one SNP above a threshold of
P<5×10
−6. The most salient of these is a suggestive novel locus in an intergenic region on chromosome 5; the most significant variant, rs200113 (
P=7.02×10
−8), is located ~400 kb downstream of the
SEMA5A gene. The remaining four regions are located within or near the genes
TMEM18, SLC28A2, ODZ2 and
ABCG2, respectively.
ABCG2 is a confirmed uric acid associated gene (
Dehghan et al. 2008;
Kolz et al. 2009;
Yang et al. 2010) and the variant showing the highest signal (
P=5.14×10
−6) is a non-synonymous SNP (rs2231142, NP_004818.2, Gln141Lys) and the mutant allele associated with an average increase of 27.40 μmol/L (
Supplementary Figure S3). This SNP showed significant gender-specific effects, with 31.11μmol/L in males compared to 22.97μmol/L in females. Reanalysis conditional on this SNP explained all the association across the region, which is highly suggestive of this missense variant being the functional SNP at the
ABCG2 locus.
| Table 1Summary of the significant SNPs and their regions |
To compare our findings with previous GWA studies, we analyzed 30 serum urate- or uric acid-associated SNPs listed in the GWA catalog (six of the 36 reported SNPs were missing from our imputed and cleaned data set) (). In addition to the aforementioned SLC2A9 and ABCG2 loci, we replicated associations with nominal significance (P<0.05) at two additional loci, RREB1 (rs675209, P=0.0032) and SLC22A12 (rs17300741, P=0.0034). The effects of all significant SNPs were in the same direction as those reported in previous GWA studies.
| Table 2Genome-wide replication of previously reported GWA SNPs |