PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcpsycBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Psychiatry
 
BMC Psychiatry. 2012; 12: 8.
Published online 2012 January 31. doi:  10.1186/1471-244X-12-8
PMCID: PMC3299660
Validation of the Chinese version of the "Mood Disorder Questionnaire" for screening bipolar disorder among patients with a current depressive episode
Zhaoyu Gan,#1 Zili Han,#1 Kanglai Li,2 Feici Diao,1 Xiaoli Wu,1 Nianhong Guan,1 and Jinbei Zhangcorresponding author1
1Psychiatry Department, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
2VIP Department, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
#Contributed equally.
Zhaoyu Gan: moyanchou/at/gmail.com; Zili Han: 13312883609/at/189.cn; Kanglai Li: likanglai1979/at/163.com; Feici Diao: feici/at/126.com; Xiaoli Wu: wxlhzp2006/at/126.com; Nianhong Guan: kuwanhong/at/yahoo.com.cn; Jinbei Zhang: jinbeizhang/at/gmail.com
Received August 12, 2011; Accepted January 31, 2012.
Abstract
Background
The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a well-recognized screening tool for bipolar disorder, but its Chinese version needs further validation. This study aims to measure the accuracy of the Chinese version of the MDQ as a screening instrument for bipolar disorder (BPD) in a group of patients with a current major depressive episode.
Methods
142 consecutive patients with an initial DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of a major depressive episode were screened for BPD using the Chinese translation of the MDQ and followed up for one year. The final diagnosis, determined by a special committee consisting of three trained senior psychiatrists, was used as a 'gold standard' and ROC was plotted to evaluate the performance of the MDQ. The optimal cut-off was chosen by maximizing the Younden's index.
Results
Of the 142 patients, 122 (85.9%) finished the one year follow-up. On the basis of a semi-structured clinical interview 48.4% (59/122) received a diagnosis of unipolar depression (UPD), 36.9% (45/122) BPDII and 14.8% (18/122) BPDI. At the end of the one year follow-up,9 moved from UPD to BPD, 2 from BPDII to UPD, 1 from BPDII to BPDI, the overall rate of initial misdiagnosis was 16.4%. MDQ showed a good accuracy for BPD: the optimal cut-off was 4, with a sensitivity of 0.72 and a specificity of 0.73. When BPDII and BPDI were calculated independently, the optimal cut-off for BPDII was 4, with a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.73; while the optimal cut-off for BPDI was 5, with a sensitivity of 0.67 and a specificity of 0.86.
Conclusions
Our results show that the Chinese version of MDQ is a valid tool for screening BPD in a group of patients with current depressive episode on the Chinese mainland.
Articles from BMC Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central