PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of optexpOSAOptics InfoBaseThis ArticleThis JournalSearchAuthor Information
Optics Express
 
Opt Express. 2011 October 24; 19(22): 22305–22315.
Published online 2011 October 24. doi:  10.1364/OE.19.022305
PMCID: PMC3298770
NIHMSID: NIHMS357796

Adaptive on-chip control of nano-optical fields with optoplasmonic vortex nanogates

Abstract

A major challenge for plasmonics as an enabling technology for quantum information processing is the realization of active spatio-temporal control of light on the nanoscale. The use of phase-shaped pulses or beams enforces specific requirements for on-chip integration and imposes strict design limitations. We introduce here an alternative approach, which is based on exploiting the strong sub-wavelength spatial phase modulation in the near-field of resonantly-excited high-Q optical microcavities integrated into plasmonic nanocircuits. Our theoretical analysis reveals the formation of areas of circulating powerflow (optical vortices) in the near-fields of optical microcavities, whose positions and mutual coupling can be controlled by tuning the microcavities parameters and the excitation wavelength. We show that optical powerflow though nanoscale plasmonic structures can be dynamically molded by engineering interactions of microcavity-induced optical vortices with noble-metal nanoparticles. The proposed strategy of re-configuring plasmonic nanocircuits via locally-addressable photonic elements opens the way to develop chip-integrated optoplasmonic switching architectures, which is crucial for implementation of quantum information nanocircuits.

OCIS codes: (240.6680) Surface plasmons, (250.5403) Plasmonics, (140.3945) Microcavities, (230.4555) Coupled resonators, (250.6715) Switching

1. Introduction

Plasmonics, which exploits reversible conversion of propagating light into surface charge density oscillations of free electrons in metals—surface plasmons (SPs)—has become a mature technology for nanoimaging and bio(chemical) sensing, and holds high promise for implementation of chip-scale information processing networks [13]. Efficient delivering of optical energy into deeply sub-wavelength areas via the excitation of localized SP resonances in metal nanostructures facilitates dramatic enhancements of local field intensities and light-matter interactions. A new area of intense research effort in plasmonics is robust on-chip dynamic spatiotemporal manipulation of the sub-wavelength fields and of interactions between single photons and single quantum emitters [48]. One important factor limiting the dynamic tunability range of plasmonic nanoelements is the required refractive index modulation range, which—due to shrinking of the spatial light-matter interaction lengths—increases with decreasing spatial dimensions. Another factor is the short dephasing times of the localized SP modes stemming from their high dissipative and radiative losses. The consequences of the latter factor are twofold. First, the reduced ‘temporal interaction length’ of light with the material imposes even more stringent requirements to the index modulation range. Second, as modes linewidths are inversely proportional to their dephasing times, plasmonic nanostructures typically feature broad scattering spectra consisting of overlapping resonance peaks corresponding to different SP modes. Individual bright and dark SP modes of complex plasmonic nanostructures can be detected by electron-energy-loss spectroscopy [9] and confocal two-photon photoluminescence mapping [10]. However, dynamical selective activation and on/off switching of spatially- and spectrally-distinct modes by using simple controls such as excitation field wavelength or polarization is not effective. On the other hand, the use of temporally phase- and amplitude-modulated pulses and beams [1116], nanofluidic chambers [17], or elastomeric substrates [18,19] may complicate on-chip integration of the plasmonic elements. Finally, efficient adaptive focusing of light generated by external sources cannot affect the radiative properties of embedded quantum emitters as it does not change the local density of optical states (LDOS) on the plasmonic chip.

We have recently demonstrated that embedding photonic elements (optical microcavities) into nanoplasmonic circuits introduces a mechanism of strong spectral selectivity into plasmonic networks owing to efficient photon trapping and re-cycling in microcavities in the form of high-Q photonic modes (e.g., whispering gallery (WG) modes) [20,21]. The resulting optoplasmonic circuits can also perform the functions of long-range light transfer with subsequent nanoscale localization as well as spectral and spatial signal (de)multiplexing. Furthermore, embedded high-Q microcavities strongly modify the local density of optical states at specific spatial locations and defined frequencies corresponding to the high-Q cavity modes [20,2224], and thus pave the way to tailoring light interactions with quantum emitters. In this paper, we will demonstrate that high-Q photonic elements also provide a rich electromagnetic field phase landscape, which can be used to achieve on-chip dynamical light spatial reconfiguring and switching within nanoscale-size plasmonic nanostructures, thus completely eliminating the need for bulky external far-field optics.

2. Resonant modulation of electromagnetic field phase with optical microcavities

A known but often overlooked feature of optical resonances is strong modification of the local phase structure of the wave field. Already the non-resonant light focusing with optical microcavities is accompanied by the emergence of phase anomalies due to the sudden transition from a converging to a diverging wave front [25]. Excitation of the localized resonances causes even more significant modifications of the fine structure of the electromagnetic field phase [26]. They are typically accompanied by a 180° phase shift of the wave function at the resonance frequency. The effect of the resonant phase reversal can be exploited to engineer Fano-type resonances resulting from the interference between alternative excitation paths of coupled modes, as has recently been demonstrated in a variety of photonic and plasmonic nanostructures [2629].

The abrupt phase reversal is also a characteristic feature of high-Q photonic resonances in microcavities, such as WG modes in microspheres [30]. This effect is demonstrated in Fig. 1 , which shows the calculated far-field scattering and near-field intensity spectra of a polystyrene microsphere illuminated by a y-polarized plane wave (Figs. 1(a,b)). As can be seen in Fig. 1, along with the well-known effect of the resonant field enhancement at the frequency of the WG eigenmode in the microsphere, the resonant reversal of the phase of the major electromagnetic field component is observed. Figure 1(c) and Media 1 reveal the detailed picture of the evolution of the spatial field intensity distribution in the x-z plane as the excitation frequency is varied and passes through the microcavity WG-mode resonance. The corresponding evolution of the spatial distribution of the phase of the complex-valued principal E-field component equation m1 is traced in Media 2 (Fig. 1(d)). Clearly, the phase portrait of the WG mode field undergoes a complex spatial transformation, which cannot be easily reduced to a simple coupled-oscillator model [26,31] frequently invoked to engineer coupled dipole LSP resonances of plasmonic nanoparticles [32]. In particular, the resonant build-up of the optical field intensity corresponding to the formation of the WG-mode pattern is accompanied by a complex picture of nucleation, drift and annihilation of multiple phase singularities both inside the cavity material and in the evanescent field area outside the microsphere ( Media 2). The observed phase singularities appear at the points of zero field intensity, which necessarily have an undefined (singular) phase, with the whole 2π range of phase values co-existing at this point [33]. The spatial drift of these phase singularities can be dynamically manipulated by tuning the external control parameters such as the excitation wavelength or the cavity material characteristics [34].

Fig. 1
Evolution of the electric field intensity and phase in the vicinity of a high-Q TE27,1 WGM resonance in a single 5.6µm-diameter polysterene microsphere. (a,b) Calculated frequency spectra of the total electric field intensity, |E|2 (a), and a ...

The results shown in Fig. 1 (and throughout the rest of the paper) are calculated by using the generalized multi-particle Mie theory (GMT) [20,3538]. To demonstrate a general physical concept rather than custom-tailored engineering solutions, we focus on model structures composed of micro- and nano-spherical particles, for which GMT provides exact semi-analytical solutions. However, the general approach outlined in this paper is by no means restricted to a certain shape or material composition of either photonic or plasmonic elements. Importantly, unlike ab initio numerical methods, GMT provides insight into underlying physical processes and enables comparing contributions from different scattering and coupling mechanisms within complex photonic, plasmonic and hybrid structures.

3. Collective field effects in hybrid optoplasmonic structures

Microcavity WG modes interact with the environment through their evanescent ‘tails,’ which can extend into the cavity exterior by tens or hundreds of nanometers (depending on the sphere size and index contrast), with the field intensity dropping off exponentially away from the sphere surface. Interaction of the WG mode with the noble metal nanoparticles immersed into its evanescent mode tail can lead to the excitation of localized SP resonances on the nanoparticles, resulting in the cascaded field enhancement in hybrid optoplasmonic structures [20,21,23,3941]. This is illustrated in Fig. 2 , where the electric field intensity spectrum in a hybrid optoplasmonic structure composed of an Au nanoparticle dimer and a dielectric microcavity (Fig. 2(a)) is compared to those of an identical isolated dimer and of a stand-alone microsphere (Fig. 2(b)). Experimentally obtained Au refractive index values from Johnson and Christy are used in all the simulations [42]. The additional microcavity-induced field enhancement of the dimer LSP field is driven by the long dephasing time of the high-Q microcavity mode, which enables efficient accumulation and recirculation of energy from external sources, albeit at the price of narrowed frequency bandwidth. Cascaded nanoscale hot-spot intensity enhancement and resonant manipulation of radiative rates of embedded emitters in hybrid optoplasmonic structures have recently been predicted theoretically [20,23,24,41,43] and demonstrated experimentally [21,40,4450]. These effects provide far-reaching opportunities for developing optical nanotraps and sensors with simultaneously high sensitivity and high spectral resolution [21,40] as well as functional elements for future quantum information optoplasmonic networks [20].

Fig. 2
Formation of photonic-plasmonic modes in hybrid optoplasmonic structures. (a) A schematic of an optoplasmonic structure composed of an Au dimer-gap nanoantenna coupled to a dielectric microsphere. (b,c) Frequency spectra (red) of the intensity enhancement ...

However, a complex local phase landscape formed around resonantly-excited microcavities offers a high level of control over the delicate sub-wavelength structure of the associated optical field, which goes far beyond the realization of cascaded photonic-plasmonic field enhancement. In particular, complex structured optical spectra (in both, far- and near-field) can be tailored by properly designing individual constituents of optoplasmonic structures as well as by tuning their mutual electromagnetic coupling. For example, the simple model optoplasmonic structure shown in Fig. 2(a) can be engineered to feature Fano-type spectral features rather than Lorentzian-type resonant peaks as in Fig. 2(b). In the simplest case, this can be achieved by increasing the size of the Au nanoparticles and thereby making additional ‘dark’ hybridized LSP eigenmodes of the dimer available for coupling to the WG mode of the microcavity [51]. A typical sharp Fano-resonance lineshape appearing in the spectrum of the optoplasmonic structure at the wavelength of the microsphere WG-mode resonance is shown in Fig. 2(c). The spatial maps of the electric field intensity around the Au nanodimer at the wavelengths corresponding to the peak intensities observed in Figs. 2(b,c) are shown in Figs. 2(d,f). In addition, we plot spatial maps of the real part of the principal electric field component equation m2 in Figs. 2(e,g) to reveal the parity of the hybridized modes. It can be seen that the formation of the intensity peaks in both Figs. 2(b) and (c) reflect coupling of the microcavity WG mode to a bright hybridized bonding LSP mode in the dimer. This bonding LSP mode is characterized by a positive parity of dipole moments oriented along the dimer axis and by a symmetric electric field distribution [51]. The dip in the intensity spectrum of the optoplasmonic structure with larger-size Au nanoparticles (observed in Fig. 2(c)) is the manifestation of the WG mode coupling to a hybridized SP mode with a field distribution that is asymmetrical with the respect to the dimer axis and symmetrical in the perpendicular direction (Figs. 2(h,i)).

The spectrum in Fig. 2(c) clearly demonstrates that hybrid optoplasmonic structures can provide switching capabilities with ultra-large modulation depth within ultra-narrow frequency bands. This paves the road to the development of all-optical memory nanoelements and on-chip optoplasmonic switching architectures with high-contrast logic levels. Furthermore, a dense spectrum of high-Q modes in microcavities makes possible combining high wavelength selectivity with multi-channel operation and multiplexing/demultiplexing capabilities [20]. The high Q-factors of the microcavity modes (resulting in their narrow linewidths) help to drastically reduce the value of the smallest refractive index change that is required to perform switching operation [34,52] and thus can overcome the intrinsic material limitation of noble metals in active plasmonic nanostructures. Depending on the microcavity material, the dynamic refractive index change can be achieved all-optically (by photo-injection) [52], electro-optically [53,54] or via temperature-induced changes [55].

4. Optoplasmonic vortex nanogates

To gain deeper insight into the dynamic picture of modes coupling and hybridization in the optoplasmonic structure in Fig. 2(a) with the change of external control parameters, we traced the evolution of the optical powerflow through the gap of the Au nanodimer as a function of the excitation wavelength. In Fig. 3 , we compare the intensity spectrum in the dimer gap (Fig. 3(a)) with the corresponding spectra of the amplitude and phase of the Poynting vector at the gap center (Fig. 3(b)). The amplitude of the three-dimensional (3D) real-valued Poynting vector equation m3 at a given point of space defines the local value of the optical power density. In turn, the Poynting vector phase can be defined in each coordinate plane as equation m4, equation m5, and characterizes the direction of the optical powerflow through this point. In particular, equation m6 (corresponding to equation m7) indicates either upward or downward energy flow through the dimer gap, respectively.

Fig. 3
Manipulation of optical powerflow through the nanoantenna gap with vortex nanogates. (a,b) Comparison of the intensity enhancement spectrum in the gap of microsphere-coupled Au dimer (a) with those of the Poynting vector amplitude and phase at the gap ...

Comparison of the spectra in Figs. 3(a) and (b) reveals a complex picture of alternating light flow through the dimer gap with the change of the wavelength. The direction of the powerflow reverses from the forward-moving at the frequencies both above and below the resonance to the backward-moving in a narrow range around the resonance wavelength. Essentially, the optoplasmonic structure driven across its hybridized photonic-plasmonic resonance operates as a photonic nanogate, which directs the optical powerflow through the nanosized channel (dimer gap). The gate can be open either ‘Up’ or ‘Down’, corresponding to either forward or backward powerflow, or ‘Closed’ at select wavelengths where the Poynting vector amplitude vanishes (resulting in no powerflow through the gap). It should be noted that the symmetrical coupled-dipole LSP resonance of the isolated nanoparticle dimer is characterized by the enhanced forward powerflow at the resonance frequency.

To better understand the physical processes underlying the operation of the optoplasmonic nanogate, in Fig. 4 we plot the spatial maps of the Poynting vector amplitude and powerflow through the nanodimer at select frequencies around the resonance. Here, each arrow points into the direction of the local powerflow, and its length is proportional to the local value of the power density. The complex 3D structure of the powerflow can be revealed by considering the 2D flow distributions in two perpendicular planes: one cutting along the dimer axis (y-z plane) and the other cutting through the center of the dimer gap (x-z plane) as shown in Figs. 4(a-c) and Figs. 4(d-f), respectively. The powerflow distributions in the y-z plane feature enhanced(suppressed) flow through the dimer gap corresponding to the open (closed) nanogate state. The most revealing, however, is the evolution of the powerflow in the x-z plane, which features formation, evolution and disappearance of local areas of circulating powerflow—optical vortices [33,56,57] ( Media 3, Figs. 3(d-f)).

Fig. 4
Operation of the optoplasmonic vortex nanogate. (a-f) Single-frame excerpts from movies of the Poynting vector intensity |S| maps and the optical power flow through the nanoantenna gap at the frequencies around the photonic-plasmonic Fano resonance shown ...

The physical origin of the optical vortex is the simple fact that the optical energy flows in the direction of the phase change. Therefore, phase singularities (occurring at points of zero field intensity) are always accompanied by the circulation of the optical energy [33,56,57]. Free-space optical vortices occur in the interference field arising from the superposition of three or more partial waves, and can be controllably created by using “forked” holograms, lenses, spiral phase plates, and spatial light modulators. Electromagnetic fields diffracted by photonic and plasmonic nanostructures can also feature optical vortices resulting from the superposition of incident and refracted/reflected waves [58,59]. In the considered optoplasmonic nanogate, optical vortices form around the phase singularities emerging in the interference field around the microcavity excited at the wavelength of its WG mode (shown in Fig. 1(d)). In fact, the well-known equation m8 phase-dependence of WG modes [60] is a signature of the presence of phase singularities in their on-resonance electromagnetic field. In this context, the azimuthal mode index equation m9 gives the number of equation m10 phase cycles around the optical vortex formed around the microcavity center. However, high-strength vortices—i.e. those with equation m11—are unstable, and typically break up into equation m12 vortices of strength equation m13 upon perturbation by an external field featuring no vortices (e.g., a constant field or a plane wave).

Media 3 shows that under excitation by a plane wave with the wavelength approaching that of the hybridized photonic-plasmonic resonance, pairs of coupled counter-rotating optical vortices are formed inside the microcavity. This results in the enhanced backward powerflow just below the microcavity surface and reduces the E-field intensity generated in the gap of the Au nanoparticle dimer located above the surface (observed in Fig. 3(a)). Tuning of the excitation wavelength across the resonance leads to the nucleation of a pair of vortices of the opposite rotation direction in the Au dimer gap, which completely block the powerflow through the gap (Fig. 4(a,d)). With the increase of the wavelength, these vortices drift apart from each other and closer to the microcavity surface, and their combined effect yields enhanced backward powerflow through the dimer gap (Fig. 4(b,e)). Note that the nucleation and annihilation of vortices is accompanied by the formation and disappearance of the powerflow saddle points, in accordance with the topological charge conservation principle [58,61]. In particular, a saddle point located just below the Au nanodimer is clearly visible in Figs. 4(a-f). Another saddle point accompanies the emergence of the vortex pair in the dimer gap. This point drifts up and down above the dimer, and its position defines the extent of the area with the enhanced backward powerflow (Fig. 4(b,e)). If the wavelength is further increased, the vortices migrate from the microcavity surface into the microcavity material, which once again reverses the powerflow direction through the dimer gap. At the same time, oppositely-rotating vortices form in the outer evanescent-tail area, yielding the enhanced forward powerflow through the gap as shown in Figs. 4(c,f). This enhanced forward powerflow drives the intensity enhancement at the resonant peak observed in Fig. 3(a). When the excitation wavelength moves away from the resonance, the phase singularities approach and annihilate, resulting in a reduced powerflow through the gap, which leads to a reduction of the near-field intensity in the nanodimer gap.

Various configurations of coupled optical vortices appearing in Figs. 4(d-f) and Media 3 resemble a complex switchable gearbox composed of multiple ‘vortex nanogears’, which can be dynamically rearranged by tuning the control parameters such as wavelength. The nanogears arrangement drives the local powerflow through the optoplasmonic nanogates, which can be reversibly switched into either ‘Open Up/Down’ or ‘Closed’ positions. The coupled vortex nanogears configurations corresponding to different regimes of the nanogate operation are schematically visualized in Figs. 4(g-i).

5. Adaptive spatial light control in optoplasmonic networks

The demonstrated ability of optoplasmonic elements to combine efficient nanofocusing of the optical energy with the strategies developed in this article to dynamically mold and re-direct the energy flow on the nanoscale can be used to develop more complex reconfigurable elements and networks. An example of such a reconfigurable optoplasmonic element is shown in Fig. 5 (a) and represents a linear chain of Au nanospheres coupled to a microcavity. Unlike the simplest structure shown in Fig. 2, this configuration features more than one focal point (dimer gap). The excitation of the isolated linear nanoparticle chain with the external plane wave results in the formation of hybridized LSP modes, with the most prominent low-Q bonding symmetrical mode featuring elevated field intensity in all the gaps along the chain (see e.g., [62]). The presence of the high-Q photonic element can be used to resonantly manipulate the powerflow through the nanoparticle chain, and, thus, to dynamically re-configure the spatial intensity distribution of the nanofocused light.

Fig. 5
Phase-operated nanoscale field intensity switching in the plasmonic nanoparticle chain. (a) A schematic of an optoplasmonic structure composed of a linear chain of Au nanoparticles coupled to a dielectric microsphere (D = 1.2µm, h = 90nm, w = ...

This effect is demonstrated in Fig. 5(b), which shows the wavelength spectra of the near-field intensity calculated at two spatial locations: in the central and side inter-particle gaps, respectively (labeled as P1 and P2 in Fig. 5(a)). It can be seen that at the wavelength corresponding to the excitation of the TM10,1 WG-mode in the microsphere, the local field intensity plots feature high-amplitude oscillations. Comparison of the spectra at P1 and P2 reveals a frequency-dependent spatial intensity switching between the central and the neighboring interparticle gaps. The electric field intensity distributions at the frequencies corresponding to the light focusing in the side gaps, even distribution between all the gaps, and focusing in the central gap are shown in Figs. 5(c), (d), and (e), respectively. The intensity patterns in Figs. 5(c-e) are overlapped with the corresponding optical powerflow maps (white arrows), which show that the intensity switching is driven by phase-controlled re-configuration of the local powerflow through the nanostructure.

6. Conclusions

We proposed and demonstrated novel optoplasmonic structures that exploit the rich phase landscape of the near-field of resonantly-excited optical microcavities to controllably manipulate sub-wavelength spatial light distributions in nanoscale structures. Our results demonstrate that the nanoscale powerflow through plasmonic structures can be directed and reversibly switched with chip-integrated high-Q photonic elements (microcavities). The possibility of local addressing of individual microcavities (optically, electro-optically or thermo-optically) in a dynamic fashion is the advantage of the proposed mechanism of the phase-operated intensity switching over previously explored strategies based of using external phase- and amplitude-modulated pulses and beams. Although we explored this approach in a few selected configurations of optoplasmonic elements in this article, the proposed strategy is very general and can be applied to design extended optoplasmonic networks of arbitrary morphology that incorporate various types of microcavities and plasmonic nanostructures. Our observations pave the road to the development of dynamically-tunable and switchable vortex-operated plasmonic nanocircuits for optical information processing and ultrasensitive biosensing.

Acknowledgments

The work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health through grant 5R01CA138509-03, the National Science Foundation through grants CBET-0853798 and CBET-0953121 (BMR) and by the EU COST Action MP0702 “Towards functional sub-wavelength photonic structures” (SVB). SVB thanks Anton Desyatnikov for stimulating discussions.

References and links

1. Halas N. J., “Connecting the dots: reinventing optics for nanoscale dimensions,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(10), 3643–3644 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900796106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Schuller J. A., Barnard E. S., Cai W., Jun Y. C., White J. S., Brongersma M. L., “Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation,” Nat. Mater. 9(3), 193–204 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nmat2630. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Kawata S., Inouye Y., Verma P., “Plasmonics for near-field nano-imaging and superlensing,” Nat. Photonics 3(7), 388–394 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.111. [Cross Ref]
4. Pacifici D., Lezec H. J., Atwater H. A., “All-optical modulation by plasmonic excitation of CdSe quantum dots,” Nat. Photonics 1(7), 402–406 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.95. [Cross Ref]
5. Pala R. A., Shimizu K. T., Melosh N. A., Brongersma M. L., “A nonvolatile plasmonic switch employing photochromic molecules,” Nano Lett. 8(5), 1506–1510 (2008). doi: 10.1021/nl0808839. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Krasavin A. V., Zayats A. V., “Electro-optic switching element for dielectric-loaded surface plasmon polariton waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(4), 041107 (2010). doi: 10.1063/1.3464552. [Cross Ref]
7. Wurtz G. A., Pollard R., Hendren W., Wiederrecht G. P., Gosztola D. J., Podolskiy V. A., Zayats A. V., “Designed ultrafast optical nonlinearity in a plasmonic nanorod metamaterial enhanced by nonlocality,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 6(2), 107–111 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.278. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. MacDonald K. F., Samson Z. L., Stockman M. I., Zheludev N. I., “Ultrafast active plasmonics,” Nat. Photonics 3(1), 55–58 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2008.249. [Cross Ref]
9. Chu M.-W., Myroshnychenko V., Chen C. H., Deng J.-P., Mou C.-Y., García de Abajo F. J., “Probing bright and dark surface-plasmon modes in individual and coupled noble metal nanoparticles using an electron beam,” Nano Lett. 9(1), 399–404 (2009). doi: 10.1021/nl803270x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Huang J.-S., Kern J., Geisler P., Weinmann P., Kamp M., Forchel A., Biagioni P., Hecht B., “Mode imaging and selection in strongly coupled nanoantennas,” Nano Lett. 10(6), 2105–2110 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nl100614p. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Aeschlimann M., Bauer M., Bayer D., Brixner T., García de Abajo F. J., Pfeiffer W., Rohmer M., Spindler C., Steeb F., “Adaptive subwavelength control of nano-optical fields,” Nature 446(7133), 301–304 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nature05595. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Aeschlimann M., Bauer M., Bayer D., Brixner T., Cunovic S., Dimler F., Fischer A., Pfeiffer W., Rohmer M., Schneider C., Steeb F., Strüber C., Voronine D. V., “Spatiotemporal control of nanooptical excitations,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107(12), 5329–5333 (2010). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913556107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Volpe G., Cherukulappurath S., Juanola Parramon R., Molina-Terriza G., Quidant R., “Controlling the optical near field of nanoantennas with spatial phase-shaped beams,” Nano Lett. 9(10), 3608–3611 (2009). doi: 10.1021/nl901821s. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Volpe G., Molina-Terriza G., Quidant R., “Deterministic subwavelength control of light confinement in nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(21), 216802 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.216802. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Stockman M. I., Faleev S. V., Bergman D. J., “Coherent control of femtosecond energy localization in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(6), 067402 (2002). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.067402. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Gjonaj B., Aulbach J., Johnson P. M., Mosk A. P., Kuipers L., Lagendijk A., “Active spatial control of plasmonic fields,” Nat. Photonics 5(6), 360–363 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2011.57. [Cross Ref]
17. Erickson D., Rockwood T., Emery T., Scherer A., Psaltis D., “Nanofluidic tuning of photonic crystal circuits,” Opt. Lett. 31(1), 59–61 (2006). doi: 10.1364/OL.31.000059. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Alexander K. D., Skinner K., Zhang S., Wei H., Lopez R., “Tunable SERS in gold nanorod dimers through strain control on an elastomeric substrate,” Nano Lett. 10(11), 4488–4493 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nl1023172. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Huang F., Baumberg J. J., “Actively tuned plasmons on elastomerically driven Au nanoparticle dimers,” Nano Lett. 10(5), 1787–1792 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nl1004114. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Boriskina S. V., Reinhard B. M., “Spectrally and spatially configurable superlenses for optoplasmonic nanocircuits,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108(8), 3147–3151 (2011). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016181108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Santiago-Cordoba M. A., Boriskina S. V., Vollmer F., Demirel M. C., “Nanoparticle-based protein detection by optical shift of a resonant microcavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(7), 073701 (2011). doi: 10.1063/1.3599706. [Cross Ref]
22. Götzinger S., de S. Menezes L., Mazzei A., Kühn S., Sandoghdar V., Benson O., “Controlled photon transfer between two individual nanoemitters via shared high-Q modes of a microsphere resonator,” Nano Lett. 6(6), 1151–1154 (2006). doi: 10.1021/nl060306p. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Devilez A., Stout B., Bonod N., “Compact metallo-dielectric optical antenna for ultra directional and enhanced radiative emission,” ACS Nano 4(6), 3390–3396 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nn100348d. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Yang X., Ishikawa A., Yin X., Zhang X., “Hybrid photonic-plasmonic crystal nanocavities,” ACS Nano 5(4), 2831–2838 (2011). doi: 10.1021/nn1033482. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Kim M.-S., Scharf T., Muhlig S., Rockstuhl C., Herzig H. P., “Gouy phase anomaly in photonic nanojets,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(19), 191114 (2011). doi: 10.1063/1.3591175. [Cross Ref]
26. Miroshnichenko A. E., Flach S., Kivshar Y. S., “Fano resonances in nanoscale structures,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(3), 2257–2298 (2010). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2257. [Cross Ref]
27. Fan J. A., Wu C., Bao K., Bao J., Bardhan R., Halas N. J., Manoharan V. N., Nordlander P., Shvets G., Capasso F., “Self-assembled plasmonic nanoparticle clusters,” Science 328(5982), 1135–1138 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1187949. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Bao K., Mirin N., Nordlander P., “Fano resonances in planar silver nanosphere clusters,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 100(2), 333–339 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s00339-010-5861-3. [Cross Ref]
29. Luk’yanchuk B., Zheludev N. I., Maier S. A., Halas N. J., Nordlander P., Giessen H., Chong C. T., “The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials,” Nat. Mater. 9(9), 707–715 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nmat2810. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Johnson B. R., “Theory of morphology-dependent resonances: shape resonances and width formulas,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10(2), 343–352 (1993). doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.10.000343. [Cross Ref]
31. Joe Y. S., Satanin A. M., Kim C. S., “Classical analogy of Fano resonances,” Phys. Scr. 74(2), 259–266 (2006). doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/74/2/020. [Cross Ref]
32. Rahmani M., Lukiyanchuk B., Ng B., Tavakkoli K G A., Liew Y. F., Hong M. H., “Generation of pronounced Fano resonances and tuning of subwavelength spatial light distribution in plasmonic pentamers,” Opt. Express 19(6), 4949–4956 (2011). doi: 10.1364/OE.19.004949. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. M. R. Dennis, K. O'Holleran, and M. J. Padgett, “Singular optics: optical vortices and polarization singularities,” in Progress in Optics Vol 53, E. Wolf, ed. (Elsevier, 2009), pp. 293–363.
34. Almeida V. R., Barrios C. A., Panepucci R. R., Lipson M., “All-optical control of light on a silicon chip,” Nature 431(7012), 1081–1084 (2004). doi: 10.1038/nature02921. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Mackowski D. W., “Calculation of total cross sections of multiple-sphere clusters,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(11), 2851–2861 (1994). doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.11.002851. [Cross Ref]
36. Xu Y. L., “Electromagnetic scattering by an aggregate of spheres,” Appl. Opt. 34(21), 4573–4588 (1995). doi: 10.1364/AO.34.004573. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Boriskina S. V., “Spectrally engineered photonic molecules as optical sensors with enhanced sensitivity: a proposal and numerical analysis,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23(8), 1565–1573 (2006). doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.23.001565. [Cross Ref]
38. Gopinath A., Boriskina S. V., Feng N.-N., Reinhard B. M., Dal Negro L., “Photonic-plasmonic scattering resonances in deterministic aperiodic structures,” Nano Lett. 8(8), 2423–2431 (2008). doi: 10.1021/nl8013692. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. M. Chamanzar, E. Shah Hosseini, S. Yegnanarayanan, and A. Adibi, “Hybrid plasmonic-photonic resonators for sensing and spectroscopy,” in Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2011), paper QTuE4.
40. Shopova S. I., Rajmangal R., Holler S., Arnold S., “Plasmonic enhancement of a whispering-gallery-mode biosensor for single nanoparticle detection,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(24), 243104 (2011). doi: 10.1063/1.3599584. [Cross Ref]
41. Zou S., Schatz G. C., “Combining micron-size glass spheres with silver nanoparticles to produce extraordinary field enhancements for surface-enhanced Raman scattering applications,” Isr. J. Chem. 46, 293–297 (2006).
42. Johnson P. B., Christy R. W., “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6(12), 4370–4379 (1972). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370. [Cross Ref]
43. Mao D., Li M., Leung W. Y., Ho K.-M., Dong L., “Photonic-plasmonic integration through the fusion of photonic crystal cavity and metallic structure,” J. Nanophotonics 5(1), 059501 (2011). doi: 10.1117/1.3562941. [Cross Ref]
44. Min B., Ostby E., Sorger V., Ulin-Avila E., Yang L., Zhang X., Vahala K., “High-Q surface-plasmon-polariton whispering-gallery microcavity,” Nature 457(7228), 455–458 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nature07627. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Kim S. M., Zhang W., Cunningham B. T., “Coupling discrete metal nanoparticles to photonic crystal surface resonant modes and application to Raman spectroscopy,” Opt. Express 18(5), 4300–4309 (2010). doi: 10.1364/OE.18.004300. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Barth M., Schietinger S., Fischer S., Becker J., Nüsse N., Aichele T., Löchel B., Sönnichsen C., Benson O., “Nanoassembled plasmonic-photonic hybrid cavity for tailored light-matter coupling,” Nano Lett. 10(3), 891–895 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nl903555u. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Hill M. T., Oei Y.-S., Smalbrugge B., Zhu Y., de Vries T., van Veldhoven P. J., van Otten F. W. M., Eijkemans T. J., Turkiewicz J. P., de Waardt H., Geluk E. J., Kwon S.-H., Lee Y.-H., Notzel R., Smit M. K., “Lasing in metallic-coated nanocavities,” Nat. Photonics 1(10), 589–594 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.171. [Cross Ref]
48. Noginov M. A., Zhu G., Belgrave A. M., Bakker R., Shalaev V. M., Narimanov E. E., Stout S., Herz E., Suteewong T., Wiesner U., “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460(7259), 1110–1112 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nature08318. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Cho C.-H., Aspetti C. O., Turk M. E., Kikkawa J. M., Nam S.-W., Agarwal R., “Tailoring hot-exciton emission and lifetimes in semiconducting nanowires via whispering-gallery nanocavity plasmons,” Nat. Mater. 10(9), 669–675 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nmat3067. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. De Angelis F., Patrini M., Das G., Maksymov I., Galli M., Businaro L., Andreani L. C., Di Fabrizio E., “A hybrid plasmonic-photonic nanodevice for label-free detection of a few molecules,” Nano Lett. 8(8), 2321–2327 (2008). doi: 10.1021/nl801112e. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Nordlander P., Oubre C., Prodan E., Li K., Stockman M. I., “Plasmon hybridization in nanoparticle dimers,” Nano Lett. 4(5), 899–903 (2004). doi: 10.1021/nl049681c. [Cross Ref]
52. Lipson M., “Switching light on a silicon chip,” Opt. Mater. 27(5), 731–739 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2004.08.006. [Cross Ref]
53. Xu Q., Schmidt B., Pradhan S., Lipson M., “Micrometre-scale silicon electro-optic modulator,” Nature 435(7040), 325–327 (2005). doi: 10.1038/nature03569. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Djordjev K., Choi S.-J., Choi S.-J., Dapkus R. D., “Microdisk tunable resonant filters and switches,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 14(6), 828–830 (2002). doi: 10.1109/LPT.2002.1003107. [Cross Ref]
55. Emelett S. J., Soref R., “Design and simulation of silicon microring optical routing switches,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23(4), 1800–1807 (2005). doi: 10.1109/JLT.2005.844494. [Cross Ref]
56. M. S. Soskin and M. V. Vasnetsov, “Singular optics,” in Progress in Optics Vol 42, E. Wolf, ed. (Elsevier, 2001), pp. 219–276.
57. Nye J. F., Berry M. V., “Dislocations in wave trains,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 336(1605), 165–190 (1974). doi: 10.1098/rspa.1974.0012. [Cross Ref]
58. D'Aguanno G., Mattiucci N., Bloemer M., Desyatnikov A., “Optical vortices during a superresolution process in a metamaterial,” Phys. Rev. A 77(4), 043825 (2008). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.043825. [Cross Ref]
59. Kim H., Park J., Cho S.-W., Lee S.-Y., Kang M., Lee B., “Synthesis and dynamic switching of surface plasmon vortices with plasmonic vortex lens,” Nano Lett. 10(2), 529–536 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nl903380j. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory(Wiley, 2007).
61. Thomas J.-L., Marchiano R., “Pseudo angular momentum and topological charge conservation for nonlinear acoustical vortices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(24), 244302 (2003). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.244302. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Yan B., Boriskina S. V., Reinhard B. M., “Optimizing gold nanoparticle cluster configurations (n ≤ 7) for array applications,” J. Phys. Chem. C Nanomater. Interfaces 115(11), 4578–4583 (2011). doi: 10.1021/jp112146d. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Optics Express are provided here courtesy of Optical Society of America