PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2012; 7(3): e32795.
Published online 2012 March 5. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0032795
PMCID: PMC3293905

Cell-Type Specific Roles for PTEN in Establishing a Functional Retinal Architecture

Branden Nelson, Editor

Abstract

Background

The retina has a unique three-dimensional architecture, the precise organization of which allows for complete sampling of the visual field. Along the radial or apicobasal axis, retinal neurons and their dendritic and axonal arbors are segregated into layers, while perpendicular to this axis, in the tangential plane, four of the six neuronal types form patterned cellular arrays, or mosaics. Currently, the molecular cues that control retinal cell positioning are not well-understood, especially those that operate in the tangential plane. Here we investigated the role of the PTEN phosphatase in establishing a functional retinal architecture.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In the developing retina, PTEN was localized preferentially to ganglion, amacrine and horizontal cells, whose somata are distributed in mosaic patterns in the tangential plane. Generation of a retina-specific Pten knock-out resulted in retinal ganglion, amacrine and horizontal cell hypertrophy, and expansion of the inner plexiform layer. The spacing of Pten mutant mosaic populations was also aberrant, as were the arborization and fasciculation patterns of their processes, displaying cell type-specific defects in the radial and tangential dimensions. Irregular oscillatory potentials were also observed in Pten mutant electroretinograms, indicative of asynchronous amacrine cell firing. Furthermore, while Pten mutant RGC axons targeted appropriate brain regions, optokinetic spatial acuity was reduced in Pten mutant animals. Finally, while some features of the Pten mutant retina appeared similar to those reported in Dscam-mutant mice, PTEN expression and activity were normal in the absence of Dscam.

Conclusions/Significance

We conclude that Pten regulates somal positioning and neurite arborization patterns of a subset of retinal cells that form mosaics, likely functioning independently of Dscam, at least during the embryonic period. Our findings thus reveal an unexpected level of cellular specificity for the multi-purpose phosphatase, and identify Pten as an integral component of a novel cell positioning pathway in the retina.

Introduction

Patterning of retinal neurons in the radial or vertical dimension allows for the directional flow of visual information. Light first stimulates photoreceptors in the outer nuclear layer (ONL), which then signal through interneurons in the inner nuclear layer (INL); the latter transform visual information and finally relay it to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), which in turn transmit visual information to the brain. A further refinement of cellular spacing occurs along the tangential (horizontal) plane, with cone photoreceptors, horizontal cells, amacrine cells and RGCs forming non-random cellular arrays or mosaics that evenly tile the retinal field [1]. The processes of retinal neurons also arborize and synapse in precise patterns, sorting into specific sublaminar compartments arranged vertically in the outer (OPL) and inner (IPL) plexiform layers, while in the horizontal plane, retinal neurites disperse in regularly spaced arrays to provide complete visual coverage [2]. Currently, the molecular mechanisms that specifically direct individual types of retinal cells into their proper laminar and mosaic positions, where they establish subtype-specific arborization patterns, are not completely understood.

Each retinal cell type follows distinct migratory routes to reach its final destination. For instance, as retinal progenitor cells differentiate into RGCs, they lose their apical processes and retain their basal contact, which becomes the axon and helps to “pull” RGCs into their laminar position in the GCL [3], [4]. In contrast, amacrine cells lose both apical and basal attachments upon differentiation, and this allows them to migrate more freely into the INL and GCL, likely in response to environmental cues [1]. Globally, the vertical migration of retinal cells depends on the extracellular matrix [5] and the proper establishment of apicobasal cell polarity [1]. In contrast, the molecular regulation of cellular positioning in the tangential plane is less well understood. At the cellular level, retinal mosaics of each cell type develop cell-autonomously, independently of those formed by other cell types [6]. Minimal distance spacing rules are the primary determinant of somal patterning in retinal cell mosaics [7]. However, the cellular mechanisms that establish these minimal distances between homotypic cells are cell type-specific, and can involve negative feedback regulation of cell fate specification, tangential dispersion and/or programmed cell death [8]. Similarly, the rules governing the distribution of retinal cell dendrites in the tangential plane also vary, depending upon the cell type in question [7]. One of the few molecules known to regulate retinal cell spacing and neurite arborization in the tangential plane is DSCAM, a homophilic cell adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF). DSCAM controls the spacing, as well as the neuritic arborization patterns, of specific RGC and amacrine cell subtypes, disrupting these cellular mosaics and leading to cell and neurite clustering [9][13]. Interestingly, in the mammalian retina, DSCAM is thought to control cell spacing and dendritic patterning by blocking responsiveness to unknown adhesive signals, resulting in a “gain” of adhesiveness in Dscam mutant retinas that leads to the specific clumping of amacrine and RGC somata and processes in ectopic locales along the radial and tangential dimensions. Currently, the identities of the adhesive signals that are blocked by DSCAM to regulate radial/tangential dispersion are unknown. However, several other cell adhesion molecules have been shown to pattern the stratification of retinal cell neurites/processes in the vertical axis of the IPL; these include the related IgSF molecules DscamL and Sidekick1/2 [14], the atypical cadherin Fat3 [15], as well as class 5 and 6 semaphorins and their plexin receptors [16].

Pten (phosphatase and tensin homolog) encodes a lipid and protein phosphatase that negatively regulates phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) signalling and controls cell growth and migration in multiple tissues [17][21]. In the nervous system, Pten mutations lead to neuronal hypertrophy and defects in cell migration, dendrite arborization and myelination [17], [18], [22][26]. In the retina, the ectopic activation of PI3K signaling results in defective cell migration [27]. Similarly, a recent report has demonstrated that the retina-specific deletion of Pten, which results in elevated PI3K signalling, results in deficits in retinal cell differentiation and migration and abnormal physiological responses of the mutant retina to light [28]. Here we used a different retina-specific cre driver, identifying several additional functions for Pten in retinal development, while corroborating some of the previously reported findings [28]. Specifically, we report that PTEN is preferentially expressed in subpopulations of mosaically-patterned retinal cells, all of which become hypertrophic in retina-specific Pten conditional knock-outs (cKO). We also identify specific defects in cellular patterning and neurite arborization in Pten mutant retinal ganglion, horizontal and amacrine cells. These Pten mutant cellular defects appear to result in abnormalities of visual processing, as revealed by deficits in ERG recordings and optokinetic responses. Finally, although the retinal phenotypes in Pten cKO and Dscam KO show some similarities, we find that PTEN expression and activity are not altered in Dscam mutants. Pten is thus a novel component of the cellular growth, positioning and neurite arborisation pathway(s) that operate within retinal cells that form non-random cellular arrays or mosaics.

Results

Generation of retinal-specific Pten cKOs

We reasoned that the molecules involved in regulating cell type-specific migration patterns in the retina would be expressed in distinct sets of actively migrating, newly differentiated retinal cells. By screening the expression profiles of several signal transduction molecules in embryonic and early postnatal mouse retinas, we revealed that several components of the PI3K signalling pathway – including the PTEN phosphatase – were expressed in a restricted manner in differentiating retinal neurons. From embryonic day (E) 12.5 to P0, PTEN protein was detected at low levels in the outer neuroblastic layer (onbl), where proliferating progenitors reside, and at higher levels in the developing INL and GCL (data not shown). By postnatal day (P)7, when retinal differentiation is complete except in the peripheral-most retina, PTEN expression was detected in a subset of postmitotic retinal cells, including Brn3b+ RGCs, calbindin+ horizontal cells, and Pax6+ amacrine cells and RGCs (Figure 1A–C). In contrast, PTEN immunoreactivity was low in Chx10+ bipolar cells and undetectable in rhodopsin+ rod photoreceptors (Figure 1D,E). Furthermore, in the plexiform layers, PTEN was co-localized in syntaxin+ amacrine cell processes, SMI-32+ RGC dendrites, and calbindin+ horizontal cell processes (Figure 1B; data not shown). During retinal development, PTEN is thus preferentially expressed in the cell bodies and processes of retinal neurons that form mosaics, including RGCs, amacrine and horizontal cells.

Figure 1
PTEN retinal expression and generation of retinal-specific Pten cKO.

Given that Pten regulates cell size, migration and neurite arborization in several CNS domains [17], [24][26], we predicted that it may play a critical role in retinal development. To analyze the requirement for Pten in the developing retina, we used a conditional loss-of-function approach, taking advantage of a retina-specific Cre transgene (Pax6 α-enhancer/P0 promoter::Cre-IRES-GFP; hereafter named Pax6::cre) that promotes recombination in the peripheral retina beginning at E10.5, targeting progenitors for all retinal cell types [29]. Pax6::cre transgenics were crossed with mice carrying a Z/AP dual reporter (Figure 1F) [30]. To confirm that cre-mediated excision occurred, a histochemical stain for alkaline phosphatase (AP), which is transcribed upon cre-mediated excision, was performed, and shown to specifically label cells in the peripheral retina of Z/AP;Pax6::cre transgenics at E12.5 and in P7 flatmounts (Figure 1G,H). Conversely, β-galactosidase activity (marking non-recombined cells) was more intense in the central retina (Figure 1I). Pax6::cre mice were then crossed with animals carrying a floxed Pten allele (floxed exons 4/5; designated Ptenfl; Figure 1J) [18]. As expected from our reporter analyses, PTEN immunolabeling was reduced, except in the central-most retina in P7 Ptenfl/fl;Pax6::cre animals (hereafter designated Pten cKO; Figure 1L vs 1K); this reduction was confirmed by Western blotting at P21 (Figure 1M).

PTEN is a negative regulator of PI3K, which phosphorylates and activates membrane inositol phospholipids. pAktSer473 is a readout of active PI3K signalling, the phosphorylation of which is reversed by the PTEN phosphatase. Accordingly, pAktSer473 levels were elevated in the peripheral GCL, INL, IPL and OPL in P7 Pten cKO retinas (Figure 1O vs 1N), and the increase in pAktSer473 levels was confirmed by Western blotting of P21 retinal lysates (Figure 1P). Furthermore, phosphorylation of S6 (pS6Ser235/236), a downstream effector of mTOR signalling that is also regulated by the PI3K pathway, was also increased (21-fold) in P21 Pten cKO retinas (Figure 1Q). Thus, PI3K and mTOR signalling, which are negatively regulated by PTEN, are strikingly upregulated as a consequence of deleting Pten in the retina.

Pten is required to establish a normal retinal architecture and regulate cell size

To determine whether Pten was globally required for retinal morphogenesis, histological sections of adult wild-type and Pten cKO retinas were analyzed. While the three cellular and two plexiform layers were readily visible in both wild-type and Pten mutant retinas (Figure 2A–D), several abnormalities were apparent in Pten cKOs, including: 1) a striking increase in retinal thickness; 2) a grossly expanded IPL populated by ectopic cells; 3) an expanded, loosely packed INL in which nuclei appeared larger, and 4) a thinner ONL. These results suggested that Pten may influence several events during retinal development, including cellular differentiation, cell migration, and neurite outgrowth and arborization, each of which was then individually investigated.

Figure 2
Abnormal retinal architecture and increased retinal cell sizes in Pten cKOs.

Pten mutations are associated with cellular hypertrophy in several tissues, largely because of the role that PTEN plays in negatively regulating mTOR-p70S6K-S6 signalling, a key cell growth pathway [18], [22][24], [31]. Given that pS6 levels were elevated in Pten cKO retinas at P21 (Figure 1Q), we investigated whether the loss of Pten resulted in an increase in retinal cell sizes (Figure 2). We found that the cross-sectional areas of calbindin+ horizontal cell bodies in Pten cKO retinas were 1.5 times the area of wild-type horizontal cells at P7 (Figure 2E–G; Table S1), increasing to 2.1 times the normal area at P21 (Figure 2H–J; Table S1). Furthermore, in P21 retinal flatmounts, the cross-sectional areas of choline acetyltransferase-positive (ChAT+; 2.1-fold increase; Figure 2K–M; Table S1) and tyrosine hydroxylase-positive (TH+; 2.4-fold increase; Figure 2N–P; Table S1) amacrine cell somata were significantly larger in Pten cKO retinas compared to wild-type retinas, as were SMI-32+ RGCs (3.1 times normal; Figure 2Q–S, Table S1).

Thus, the sizes of somata of the three retinal cell types that express high levels of PTEN are increased in Pten cKOs, as expected from the observed increase in mTOR signalling in these mutant retinas.

Pten regulates the positioning of RGCs, amacrine and horizontal cell bodies

A fundamental feature of the mature retina is that neuronal cell bodies are positioned in discrete strata within a nuclear layer for a given type of cell, and that cells of a given type are positioned at regular intervals across that stratum, facilitating complete and economical sampling of the visual field [32]. These two features of a functional retinal architecture are produced during development through the radial and tangential dispersion of newborn neuroblasts [33]. Our histological analyses provided evidence for aberrant radial migration in the absence of Pten function, as ectopic cells were detected in the Pten cKO IPL (Figure 2B,D). Furthermore, Pax6+ amacrine cells and Brn3a+ RGCs were detected in the Pten cKO IPL, indicating that subsets of amacrine cells and RGCs migrate aberrantly along the radial axis (Figure S1).

To test whether Pten also regulates the tangential dispersion of retinal cells, we assessed the mosaic distribution of horizontal and amacrine cell subtypes in P21 retinal flatmounts. Anti-TH was used to label dopaminergic amacrine cells. In wild-type retinae, TH+ cell somata mosaics were dispersed in a patterned array (Figure 3A) [34]. In contrast, in Pten cKO retinas, TH+ amacrine cells appeared less regularly distributed (Figure 3B). To quantify the regularity of the cellular spacing in these mosaics, we examined their spatial properties using Voronoi domain and nearest neighbor analyses. Voronoi domain analysis computes the territory surrounding each cell that is closer to that cell than any of the neighboring cells [35]. Visual analysis of these Voronoi diagrams (Figure 3C,D) and of plots comparing the frequency of domain areas (Figure 3C′,D′) revealed a greater variability in domain sizes in Pten cKO retinae. To analyze this quantitatively, the Voronoi domain regularity index was calculated for each individual field (average domain area/standard deviation; Figure 3G), with higher values indicative of more regular spacing. As expected, TH+ regularity indices derived from this Voronoi tessellation were significantly lower in Pten cKO retinae (p<0.0001; Figure 3G, Table S2). Nearest neighbour analyses revealed a comparable increase in the variability of this measure (Figure 3E,F), as revealed by the skewed distribution of nearest neighbour distances for the TH+ amacrine cells in Pten cKO retina (Figure 3E′F′), resulting in a significant decrease in the nearest neighbor regularity index (p<0.0001; Figure 3H).

Figure 3
Aberrant cellular mosaicism in Pten cKOs.

We used similar analyses to examine the distribution of calbindin+ horizontal cells in P21 wild-type and Pten cKO retinal flatmounts (Figure 3I,J). By generating the Voronoi tessellation for calbindin+ horizontal cells (Figure 3K,L), and by plotting domain sizes (Figure 3K′,L′), it was apparent that calbindin+ domains were more irregular in Pten cKO retinae. Accordingly, a significant decrease in the Voronoi domain regularity index was observed in Pten cKO retinae (p = 0.03; Figure 3O). In contrast, while there was a trend towards more variable calbindin+ nearest neighbours in Pten cKO retinae (Figure 3 N,N′,O,O′), this difference did not reach statistical signficance (P>0.05; Figure 3P).

Pten thus plays a role in the establishment of the mosaic patterns of dopaminergic amacrine cells and calbindin+ horizontal cells.

Amacrine cell and horizontal cell differentiation are perturbed in Pten cKO retinae

There are several variables that may negatively influence the regularity of TH+ amacrine cell and calbindin+ horizontal cell mosaics in Pten cKO retinae, including alterations in retinal surface area, cell density, cell death, cell dispersion and cell fate specification [8]. To better understand the disruption of these mosaics in Pten cKO, we examined these parameters in more detail. We first measured the overall surface area of the P21 retina, revealing that Pten cKO retinae were 1.4-fold larger than wild-type controls (P<0.0001; Figure 4A–C). We then quantitated the density of TH+ amacrine cells and calbindin+ horizontal cells, and by multiplying this number by the retinal surface area, generated an estimate of total numbers of these cells in individual retinas. Strikingly, both TH+ amacrine cells (P<0.0001; Figure 4D) and calbindin+ horizontal cells (P<0.0001; Figure 4E) were reduced in number in Pten cKO retinas (Table S2). Taken together these data suggested that the loss of Pten leads to retinal hypetrophy at the tissue level, but suggest that this is not due to a global increase in cell number; rather, certain populations of retinal cells are present in lower numbers in Pten cKO retinas.

Figure 4
Alterations of retinal surface area and horizontal and amacrine cell numbers in Pten cKO retinas.

We next addressed the mechanisms that might account for the reduction in retinal cell numbers in Pten cKO retinae. Apoptosis has been implicated in controlling the tangential distribution of dopaminergic amacrine cells [34], although it is thought to play a lesser role in regulating the formation of horizontal cell mosaics [7]. To visualize apoptotic cells, we monitored the expression of activated caspase-3 (ac-3) in wild-type and Pten cKO retinae at E15.5, P0 and P7. The number of ac-3+ cells was not noticeably elevated in Pten cKO retinas at embryonic and postnatal stages (Figure S2). While the small number of ac-3+ cells made it difficult to make a definitive statement, we nevertheless speculated that it may instead be that fewer amacrine and horizontal cells were born in Pten cKO retinas during development, rather than these cells undergoing excessive cell death after their birth. To test this, we used birthdating experiments, examining amacrine cell differentiation between E12.5 to E18.5, when most of these cells are born [36]. Given the sparse nature of horizontal cells, similar studies were not performed with this cell type. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was injected into timed pregnant females at E12.5, E15.5 and E18.5 and retinas were then harvested at P7. By using Pax6 as a pan-amacrine cell marker and quantitating BrdU+Pax6+/total BrdU+ cells, we were able to show that there was a significant decrease in the number of amacrine cells born at E12.5 (P = 0.02; Figure 4F–H), E15.5 (P = 0.04; Figure 4I–K) and E18.5 (P = 0.0007; data not shown) in Pten cKO retinas.

There is thus a reduction in amacrine cell differentiation in Pten cKO retinas throughout the period of genesis of this cell type. These fewer amacrine cells then become aberrantly distributed in the larger retinal surface area that is characteristic of Pten cKO retinas.

Aberrant IPL sublaminar organization in Pten cKOs

Because it has been shown that irregularity of cell spacing can influence neurite arborization patterns (and vice versa) [10], we examined the distribution of amacrine cell and RGC processes in the tangential plane of Pten cKO retinas. In TH-labeled retinal flatmounts, ectopic fasciculation and bundling of TH+ processes was observed in P21 Pten cKO retinas, a feature not present in the wild-type retinas (Figure 5A,B). Similarly, the dendrites of melanopsin+ ipRGCs were aberrantly bundled in P21 Pten cKO retinal flatmounts (Figure 5C,D). Pten thus plays a role in uniformly distributing the processes of these two cell types across the retinal surface. In the absence of this phosphatase, RGC dendrites and TH+ amacrine cell processes appear to show a preference for adhering to like-type processes, thereby fasciculating abnormally.

Figure 5
Abnormal patterning of the hypertrophic IPL in Pten cKOs.

The gross expansion of the IPL in Pten mutant retinas suggested that patterns of neurite stratification along the radial axis might also be perturbed. Across this dimension, the IPL is comprised of columnar modules of amacrine cell processes, bipolar cell axons and RGC dendrites, which arborize and synapse in discrete layers in a stereotypic fashion. The IPL is subdivided into two broad ON and OFF layers, in which the processes of neurons depolarize or hyperpolarize, respectively, in response to light. Within those two layers, the IPL is further subdivided into discrete strata containing the processes of particular types of bipolar, amacrine and ganglion cells. Pten plays a role in the establishment of this stratified architecture of the IPL. A disorganized and expanded IPL was observed as early as P7 in Pten cKOs, as revealed by the GFP reporter from the Pax6::cre transgene, which was co-localized with Pax6+ (in somata of amacrine cells and RGCs) and syntaxin (in amacrine cell processes; Figure 5E–H). By P21, an increasingly expanded and fractionated IPL was present in Pten cKOs, as revealed by labelling with pAktSer473 (Figure 1N,O), syntaxin (Figure 5I,J), and phalloidin (labels actin cytoskeleton; data not shown), in all IPL strata. To assess IPL patterning in more detail, sublamina-specific markers were used. Given the aberrant fasciculation of melanopsin+ ipRGC dendrites in the tangential plane, we first examined if these dendrites were similarly perturbed in the radial axis. Melanopsin is expressed in dendrites of type 1 (monostratified, targeting stratum 1) and type 2 (highly branched, targeting inner or proximal IPL) intrinsically photoreceptive RGCs (ipRGCs), and this stratification pattern was normal in Pten cKOs (Figure 5K,L). Similarly, the processes of TH+ amacrine cells, which were also more heavily fasciculated in the tangential plane, properly targeted substratum 1 in Pten cKOs (Figure 5M,N). This was in contrast to amacrine cell processes labelled with calretinin and calbindin, which arborized in three strata in the IPL; and ChAT, a marker for cholinergic starburst amacrine cells, which arborized in OFF (layer 2) or ON (layer 4) sublaminae; all of these arborization patterns were disrupted in P21 Pten cKO retinas (Figure 5O–R; 2E,F). Finally, the normal termination zone of rod bipolar cell terminals in sublamina 5, as revealed by labelling for protein kinase C α (PKCα), was severely perturbed in Pten cKO retinas, with axonal boutons not restricted to sublamina 5 (Figure 5S,T).

IPL patterning was thus found to be strikingly perturbed in Pten cKOs, with defects most evident for amacrine cell processes and bipolar cells. Given that synaptic patterning depends on appropriate patterns of dendritic growth and arborization, we next used electron microscopy (EM) to look for evidence of bipolar and amacrine cell synapses in regions of the Pten cKO IPL where ectopic cells and aberrant PKC terminals were observed. Low-magnification EM images confirmed the striking expansion of the IPL and the loose packing of INL cells in adult Pten cKO retinas compared to wild-type retinas (Figure 6A,B). In high-magnification EM images, synapses were observed between amacrine and bipolar cells that were ectopically located in the Pten cKO IPL (Figure 6C–F). Moreover, the presence of synaptically-located ribbons at aberrant contacts (Figure 6D) suggests that neurotransmission may occur at these sites. Indeed, molecular constituents of bipolar and amacrine cells, albeit somewhat disorganized, were expressed in the IPL of P21 Pten cKO retinas. These included VGLUT1 (Figure 6I,I′,J,J′), a pre-synaptic, vesicular glutamate transporter that loads glutamate into a bipolar cell's synaptic vesicles; PKCα, which labels glutamatergic bipolar cell terminals (Figure 6G,G′,H,H′); and syntaxin, which labels amacrine cell presynaptic terminals (Figure 6G,G′,H,H′). Notably, co-localization of PKCα and syntaxin was detected in ectopic sites in the Pten cKO IPL (Figure 6G,G′,H,H′). Misplaced cells can therefore form apparent synaptic contacts in Pten cKOs, although from their structure alone, we could not be certain that they were functional.

Figure 6
Synaptic contacts in the Pten cKO retinal IPL.

Pten regulates physiological responses to light

The presence of an expanded and disorganized IPL and the loss of spatial regularity of certain cellular populations suggested that Pten cKO retinae may not be able to respond appropriately to light stimuli. To directly address retinal function, the physiological activity of adult Pten cKO retinae was assessed by recording full field ERGs. The photoreceptor (a-wave) and bipolar cell (b-wave) responses (amplitudes and implicit times) to a stepwise series of increasing strengths of flashes of light were similar in both wild-type and Pten cKOs under scotopic and photopic adaptation (Figure S3A–F; Table S3). The only significant interaction was a reduction in b-wave amplitude in Pten cKOs when activity from cone bipolar cell responses was isolated with a double flash procedure under scotopic adaptation (Figure S3G; Table S3). To investigate the dynamics of amacrine cell-dependent physiological functions [37], we used the Morlet wavelet transformation to simultaneously characterize three oscillatory potential (OP) properties, which can be graphically represented on a scalogram, with amplitude (grey scale, from low to high amplitude in black and white, respectively) plotted relative to ERG frequency (y axis) and latency (x axis) [37]. OPs, which are represented in ERG raw traces and as scalograms (Figure 7A–C,G–I; Figure S4A–C), were strikingly irregular in Pten cKO retinae. Quantitatively, while OP amplitudes did not vary between groups, frequencies were significantly reduced under scotopic and photopic adaptation in Pten mutants compared to wild-type retinas (Figure 7E,K; Figure S4E; Table S3). A significant interaction was also found in OP amplitudes of Pten cKOs when cone-driven responses were isolated with a double flash under scotopic adaptation (Figure 7J; Table S3). Finally, OP latencies were also significantly prolonged under scotopic adaptation in Pten mutant mice (Figure 7F; Table S3).

Figure 7
Altered ERG oscillatory potential responses in Pten cKO animals.

Taken together, these findings reveal abnormal physiological responses in the retinas of Pten cKO mice, with light-dependent phase-locking of amacrine cell firing being most severely affected, while other ERG components (i.e., a- and b-waves) were largely spared.

Pten is required for vision-dependent behaviour

RGCs are the output neurons of the retina, projecting their axons to visual centers in the brain, including the lateral geniculate nucleus and superior colliculus. Since amacrine cells strongly influence the organization of RGC receptive fields [38], the abnormality of visual processing by amacrine cells in Pten mutants could affect visual behaviour. To assess whether Pten is required for higher-order visual functioning, we first determined whether RGC axons projected to their appropriate central targets in the absence of Pten function. RGC axons were first labelled with SMI-32 in P21 retinal flatmounts, and the fascicles were observed to be thicker and more bundled in Pten cKO vs wild-type retinas (Figure 8A,A′,B,B′). Pten cKO optic nerve diameters were also increased compared to controls (Figure 8C–E). These results suggest that, like the RGC cell bodies themselves (Figure 2Q–S), their optic axons are hypertrophic, although we cannot rule out the possibility that an increase in axon number also contributes, particularly since retinal area (Figure 4C) increases almost as much as does the increase in the cross-sectional area of the optic nerve (Figure 8C–E). Regardless of the cause of the optic nerve hypertrophy, by using a Z/AP dual reporter to label Pax6::cre-recombined (i.e., AP+) RGC axons [29], [30], [39], we observed that the AP-labeled optic tract innervated the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) and superior colliculus (SC) similarly in P21 wild-type and Pten cKOs (Figure 8F,G). Thus, deletion of Pten in RGCs does not influence the specificity of their targeting to these two main retinofugal targets. Indeed, the AP-negative strip associated with central RGCs that did not undergo cre-mediated recombination (Figure 1H) was apparent across the medio-lateral axis of the superior colliculus in the Pten cKO retina, as it is in the wild-type (Figure 8F,G), indicating no gross disruption of retinotopic order across the surface of the superior colliculus.

Figure 8
Aberrant RGC fasciculation and subcortical visual responses in Pten cKOs.

To determine whether the spatiotemporal processing of visual information and its transmission to the brain were altered in Pten cKO animals, we analyzed the optokinetic reflex (OKR), a subcortical motor response to moving stripe patterns that is a reliable and quantitative behavioural indicator of some aspects of retinal function [40]. OKRs were measured using a virtual cylinder that displayed vertical black and white stripes of varying dimensions and contrasts, rotated at different speeds. In wild-type adult mice, maximum contrast sensitivities were uniformly ~15.8 (threshold contrast = 6.3%) at the optimal spatial frequencies (0.061 and 0.1 cycles/degree (c/d)), while the lower and upper limits of spatial frequencies that evoked an OKR at 100% contrast were 0.019 and 0.375 c/d, respectively (Figure 8H). Average contrast sensitivities of wild-type and Pten cKO animals at 0.275 c/d were significantly different (n = 6 each; P = 0.034; Table S4). However, the distribution of contrast sensitivities in Pten cKOs was bimodal, falling into a severely affected and a relatively unaffected group (n = 3 each). The OKR contrast sensitivities of “unaffected” Pten cKO mice were indistinguishable from those of wild-type mice, except for a mild attenuation of contrast sensitivity and lowering of acuity at the highest spatial frequencies (Figure 8I). The OKR contrast sensitivities of “affected” Pten cKOs were significantly different from those of either wild-type (P<0.001) or “unaffected” Pten cKOs (P = 0.003; Table S4), reaching a maximum of only 2 (threshold contrast = 50%) at the optimum spatial frequency, 0.1 c/d, and could be elicited reliably only from 0.061–0.200 c/d (Figure 8I).

Thus, some Pten cKO mutants have a diminished capacity to respond to motion of a global stripe pattern, suggesting that the inner-retinal (bipolar-amacrine-ganglion cell) circuits that mediate contrast sensitivity in this behavioural paradigm are impaired.

Dscam does not regulate Pten/PI3K signalling in the retina

Since PTEN is an intracellular signaling molecule, it seemed likely itself to be regulated by extrinsic signals. For that reason, we were struck by the similarities between Pten and Dscam mutant retinas, both of which develop a markedly thickened IPL and display aberrant fasciculation and mosaic patterning of subsets of amacrine cells [9], [11]. To test for regulatory interactions between Pten and Dscam, we first determined whether retinal expression of Dscam was altered in the absence of Pten expression. Dscam is expressed in amacrine cells and RGCs in the INL and GCL [9], [11], as shown here in P7 wild-type retinas (Figure 9A). In P7 Pten cKO retinas, Dscam transcripts were similarly detected in the INL and GCL, but expression was also detected in ectopic cells in the IPL (Figure 9B). Thus, the maintenance of Dscam expression in Pten cKO retinas was not itself sufficient to prevent amacrine cells and/or RGCs from aberrantly migrating into the IPL. Moreover, DSCAM does not prevent amacrine cell processes from fasciculating in the IPL in Pten cKO retinas, even though DSCAM is thought to prevent such homotypic adhesion [10].

Figure 9
Interactions between Pten and Dscam.

Next we asked the converse question, examining whether PTEN protein and/or activity levels were altered in Dscam mutant retinas. For this purpose we acquired Dscam null mutants, most of which die immediately after birth [41], contrasting to spontaneous Dscam mutants, which survive postnatally [9], [11], [12]. Amacrine cell spacing and projection defects were not yet apparent in Dscam mutants at E18.5, as revealed by Pax6, syntaxin and calretinin immunolabeling (Figure 9C–F). Notably, amacrine cell defects were also not yet apparent in Pten cKOs at E18.5 (data not shown). Nevertheless, we reasoned that E18.5 was an appropriate stage to study for our purposes, as amacrine cells are actively migrating [42] and have begun to innervate the IPL [43] at this stage in wild-type mice. Western blot analysis of E18.5 retinal tissue revealed that PTEN, pPTENSer380, pAktSer473 and pS6 levels were not significantly different in wild-type and Dscam mutant retinas (Figure 9G–I).

The lack of alterations in PI3K signalling components, including PTEN, in Dscam mutant retinas, suggests that that PI3K signaling is not regulated by DSCAM in the retina, at least at E18.5, when amacrine cells are migrating and the IPL is beginning to form.

Discussion

The acquisition of a functional retinal architecture requires the coordination of multiple events, including the control of cell growth, migration, neurite arborization and synaptogenesis. How these events are coordinated in such a way as to ensure proper neuronal positioning, both within individual retinal cell populations and across the retinal layers, is poorly understood. Here we have identified the PTEN phosphatase as a critical regulator of retinal tissue morphogenesis, identifying roles for this phosphatase in mosaically-patterned RGCs, amacrine and horizontal cells. We found that while Pten restricts the growth of each of these cell types, it has cell type-specific roles in regulating the radial and tangential migration and neurite arborization patterns of each cell population. In the radial axis, we detected ectopic RGCs and amacrine cells in the IPL, while in the tangential plane, TH+ amacrine cells are particularly sensitive to the loss of Pten, displaying defects in the regularity of their patterned somal distributions, as well as aberrant fasciculation of their processes. The dendrites of Pten mutant melanopsin+ ipRGCs likewise show aberrant fasciculation, but colonize their appropriate strata within the IPL sublaminae. Similarly, the spacing of calbindin+ horizontal cells is disrupted in the tangential dimension in Pten mutant retinas but the positioning of their somata across the radial axis of the retina is not perturbed; nor is the stratification of their processes affected. Finally, we show that PTEN/PI3K signaling is not altered in Dscam mutant retinas, suggesting that PTEN does not function downstream of this cellular adhesion pathway to regulate amacrine and RGC cell and neurite spacing, at least during the embryonic period. Taken together, these data indicate that distinct molecular controls govern the radial and tangential migration of retinal cell bodies to their final destinations, where they establish specific arborization patterns and synaptic connections, and implicate Pten as a critical component of several of these pathways.

Pten regulates cell and neurite growth in the retina

Pten is a well-known negative regulator of cellular growth, as evidenced by its designation as a tumor suppressor gene. Accordingly, in humans, germline Pten mutations are also associated with hamartoma tumour syndromes (e.g., Lhermitte–Duclos disease, Cowden syndrome), which are characterized by tumour-like clusters of overgrown, differentiated cells [44]. Moreover, tissue-specific mutations of Pten in the mouse result in hyperplasia in multiple organs, including the pancreas, hippocampus, neocortex and cerebellum [18], [22], [45], [46]. However, Pten's role in growth control is tissue-specific, as it is not required to prevent overgrowth of thymocytes and fibroblasts [47]. Here we report that Pten cKO causes RGC, horizontal and amacrine cell hypertrophy, and suggest that this is due to elevated mTOR signalling [31]. We also observe a progressive thickening of the IPL and optic nerve from P7 to adulthood in Pten cKOs, suggesting a continuity of growth of amacrine/RGC processes, similar to CNS hyperplastic defects reported in other Pten cKOs [24], [26]. Notably, such overgrowth can be beneficial as optic nerve regeneration is enhanced when Pten is knocked down in damaged optic nerves [48], resulting in some re-innervation of the dorsal LGN [49].

In the context of normal development, cellular hypertrophy is obviously not beneficial, and likely contributes to the aberrant tissue morphogenesis observed in Pten cKO retinas. For instance, the continual growth of amacrine cells, including their processes, likely contributes to the aberrant patterning of the IPL we observe in Pten cKO retinas. Nevertheless, we do not believe that cellular hypertrophy is primarily responsible for all defects observed in Pten cKO retinas, for the following reasons: 1) When retinal cell sizes increase, one would expect a uniform increase in Voronoi domain size and nearest neighbor distances. Instead, what we observe in Pten cKO retinas is a decrease in the regularity of these parameters, indicating that the normal spatial relationships between TH+ amacrine cells and calbindin+ horizontal cells are disordered. 2) While ipRGCs also increase in size in Pten cKO retinas, their dendrites target the correct sublamina in the IPL, and aberrant dendritic fasciculation is only observed in the tangential plane. Moreover, RGC axons still target their appropriate retino-recipient nuclei, the LGN and superior colliculus, and apparently do so in a normal retinotopic manner, at least at the gross level.

The cell type-specific effects of Pten in the context of retinal cell migration and neurite patterning are discussed in more detail in the following sections.

Pten regulates retinal cell migration in a cell type-specific manner

Cones, RGCs, horizontal and amacrine cells migrate radially to form layers, and then disperse in the tangential plane to form non-random cellular mosaics [33]. Conversely, rod and bipolar cell migration is only regulated in the radial axis [33]. We found that some RGCs and amacrine cells were ectopically positioned in the Pten cKO IPL, consistent with Pten's known role in regulating radial migration in other regions of the central nervous system [17][19]. In contrast, we did not find any evidence for aberrant positioning of horizontal cells across the depth of Pten cKO retinas. However, TH+ amacrine cells and calbindin+ horizontal cells were aberrantly dispersed in the tangential axis in Pten cKOs. Fundamental differences in how RGC, horizontal and amacrine cells migrate may explain differences in Pten-dependency. Upon differentiation, amacrine cells lose their apico-basal contacts and are thus more sensitive to environmental cues in their migratory path compared to RGCs, which retain a basal attachment (presumptive axon) that acts as a “tether” to pull RGCs into the GCL [1]. Similarly, horizontal cell progenitors lose their apical and basal contacts and divide in non-apical positions before going to their final, definitive position, making them more sensitive to environmental cues [50]. Thus, amacrine cells and horizontal cells may be most sensitive to the loss of Pten if the loss of this signalling molecule results in an impaired ability to “sense” the proximity of like-neighbours, or an inherent inability to follow tangential migratory cues [51]. This raises the question of what the extrinsic cue(s) might be that require PTEN to transduce their signal?

Aberrant retinal spacing in Pten cKOs may arise because of defective intercellular adhesion, a process that Pten regulates in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [52]. Indeed, the cell spacing defects in Pten cKO retinas most closely resemble those observed following the mutation of several adhesion molecules. For example, mutations in zebrafish N-cadherin also result in hypertrophic RGC and amacrine cell bodies and processes that are aberrantly patterned [53], [54]. Here we investigated the relationship between Pten and DSCAM, given the cellular specificity of Pten cKO phenotypes most closely phenocopy those observed in Dscam mutants [9][12]. While DSCAM's role in cell adhesion is evolutionarily conserved, how it functions has changed. Drosophila Dscam1 undergoes extensive alternative splicing, resulting in cell type-specific expression of multiple, unique isoforms that prevent homophilic (self-self) associations [55], [56]. In contrast, mammalian Dscam is not extensively alternatively spliced, such that neighboring retinal cells whose dendritic arborizations overlap can express the same isoform [10], [57]. DSCAM therefore cannot act as a direct repulsive cue during mosaic patterning. Instead, it has been suggested that the aberrant clustering of amacrine cells and RGCs in Dscam mutant retinas arises because DSCAM is required to block unknown adhesive pathways that are normally silenced. Unmasking of these adhesive pathways in Dscam KOs results in aberrant mosaicism and neurite fasciculation [10], [57].

Interestingly, the aberrantly positioned retinal cells in the Pten cKO IPL continue to express Dscam, suggesting that the normal “anti-adhesive” properties of DSCAM are not sufficient to prevent cellular mispositioning, at least in the absence of Pten. Defects in cell spacing and neuritic differentiation as well as an expanded IPL similar to those in the Dscam mutant retina have also been detected in the Bax KO retina, where there is similarly no modulation of Dscam expression [13]. However, it is important to note that there are also fundamental differences in the aberrant mosaic patterns observed in Pten cKO (this study), Dscam KO [9][13] and Bax KO [13] retinas. Most notably, while we have observed a skewed distribution towards larger distances between nearest neighbors and Voronoi domain sizes for both calbindin+ horizontal cells and TH+ amacrine cells in Pten cKO retinas, these parameters are instead skewed towards the smaller end in Dscam KO and Bax KO retinas. That is to say, there is an increased clustering of amacrine cells in Dscam KO and Bax KO retinas, while conversely; we observe an overall increase in the spacing of these cells in Pten cKO retinas (albeit one that similarly degrades mosaic regularity). Possible causes for the increased distances between homotypic cells in Pten cKO retinas may include the reduction in horizontal and amacrine cell numbers, or because these cell types increase in size. However, it remains formally possible that these defects may also reflect aberrant migratory properties of Pten mutant retinal cells in the tangential plane. Indeed, tangential dispersion is a key determinant in the establishment of horizontal, cholinergic and ganglion cell mosaics [7], although it appears to play a minimal role in establishing the mosaics of TH+ amacrine cells [34].

Future studies will be required to establish the precise role that Pten plays in establishing retinal cell mosaics. Nevertheless, we can conclude that DSCAM and PTEN may function in independent pathways as Dscam expression is maintained in Pten cKO retinas, and PTEN/PI3K protein and activity levels are unperturbed in Dscam mutant retinas, at least at E18.5. However, PTEN also has PI3K-independent nuclear functions [58], suggesting that Pten may function in unknown ways to contribute to Dscam-mediated retinal cell spacing.

Pten regulates laminar patterning of the IPL

PI3K and PTEN activity are high in the P7 IPL, during the period when RGC, amacrine cell, and bipolar cell neurites are actively innervating IPL sublamina in a highly-patterned array. Accordingly, we found that Pten is required for IPL stratification. Specifically, the targeting of most amacrine cell processes and bipolar cell axons to appropriate IPL sublamina is severely disrupted in Pten cKOs, consistent with recent findings obtained by a different group using a Chx10::cre driver line [28]. Two exceptions to this rule are the ipRGC dendrites and TH+ amacrine cell processes, both of which normally targeted substratum 1 in Pten cKO retinae. This finding was particularly surprising given the hyper-fasciculation of ipRGC dendrites and TH+ amacrine cell processes in the tangential plane.

Dscam and the related IgSF molecules DscamL and Sidekick1/2 also participate in IPL sublamination [12], [14], further supporting the similarity of PTEN and adhesion molecule function in retinal patterning. In addition, PlexinA4/Sema6a, Sema5a/Sema5b, and PlexinA1/PlexinA3 double mutants each display similar, but also each unique types of IPL patterning deficits to those seen in Pten cKOs, with the exception that they do not have an expanded IPL [16]. While intracellular signalling cascades that operate downstream of Sema5a, Sema5b, Sema6a or PlexinA1, PlexinA3, PlexinA4 have yet to be characterized in the retina, PlexinB1/Sema4D have been shown to regulate PTEN and PI3K activities in a context-dependent manner [59], [60]. It is tempting to speculate that PTEN activity may be regulated by some combination of Plexin/Sema receptor signalling in the retina, in such a way as to control the targeting of amacrine cell processes in the IPL without affecting their growth.

Pten's role in regulating visual physiology and behaviour

By conducting a thorough ERG analysis in Pten cKO mice, we found that photoreceptor (A-wave) and bipolar cell (B-wave) function is relatively unaffected in these mutant mice. However, further analyses using a continuous Morlet analysis of ERG responses over a wide range of stimulus intensities allowed us to define the dynamics of OP firing in Pten cKO mice. These studies revealed a dysregulation of light-driven phase locking in Pten cKO mice, which we infer to mean that Pten is required for the synchronous firing of amacrine cells. In contrast, a recent study in a different conditional Pten cKO model reported no changes in OPs with the exception of increased amplitudes only under photopic adaptation, possibly because they only performed limited amplitude measurements of filtered ERG traces (50–170 Hz) at a single flash strength [28]. Other studies have similarly suggested that Pten regulates neural circuitry function. For instance, in vivo knockdown of Pten in adult mouse hippocampus results in an increased excitatory drive onto dentate granule cells [61]. Another study has shown that Pten also regulates proper long-term potentiation and depression in the hippocampus, independently of its effects on cell morphology and migration [62]. Interestingly, Dscam null mutants similarly display a loss of synchronous firing of pre-inspiratory neurons in the medulla, the site of the rhythm generator that controls respiration, accounting for the premature death of these animals [41]. However, while the ERG of dark-adapted mice was previously tested in spontaneous Dscam mutants [11], it remains to be determined whether OPs or OKRs are aberrant in them.

In addition to the aberrant retinal physiology in Pten cKO mice, we further suggest that these defects in amacrine cell function also influence visual behaviour. Indeed, evoking an OKR is dependent upon image-processing by directionally selective RGCs [40], the activity of which is influenced by amacrine cells [63], and we found that approximately half of Pten cKO mice display OKR defects. These OKR defects are unlikely due to a perturbation of the visual pathway outside of the retina. Indeed, despite the striking increase in Pten cKO optic nerve diameter, gross overall connectivity (i.e., RGC targeting of the SC and LGN) of the visual pathway was apparently unaffected by the loss of this signaling molecule. Future experiments will be needed to determine what underlies the increased optic nerve thickness in Pten cKO mice, whether it arises due to an increase in numbers of RGC axons, hypertrophy of individual RGC axons, increased fasciculation, or enhanced myelination.

It is currently unknown why some Pten cKO mice have an apparently normal capacity to respond to motion of a global stripe pattern, a behaviour that depends on inner-retinal circuitry (bipolar-amacrine-ganglion cell), which was strikingly disrupted in these mutants. However, we suggest that the disruption in IPL patterning in Pten cKO retinas is likely due to the progressive overgrowth of amacrine cell processes and RGC dendrites, and it may be that prior to their overgrowth, these neurons establish some appropriate connections. Future experiments will be needed to determine if some Pten cKO mice still contain some level of appropriate connectivity and/or physiological activity between specific populations of amacrine cells and RGCs that would allow for proper OKR responses.

In summary, we have identified cell type-specific functions for Pten in regulating migration and neurite arborization in a subset of retinal RGCs, horizontal cells and amacrine cells. This is an unexpected level of cellular specificity, given that PTEN and other signalling molecules are thought to be ubiquitously expressed and to have pleiotropic functions. Instead, our data support specific roles for Pten in individual retinal cell populations, specifically those that form retinal mosaics. However, within each of these cell populations, Pten may have multiple roles, regulating not only cell growth, but also migration, neurite arborisation and neuronal function. The future goal will be to determine how PTEN function is regulated and functions within each of these cell populations to carry out each of its precise roles.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All animal procedures were compliant with the Guidelines of the Canadian Council of Animal Care (CCAC) and were approved by the University of Calgary Animal Care Committee under animal protocol M08006. Pax6::cre [29] and Z/AP [30] transgenes were maintained on a CD1 background and genotyped as described. The Ptenfl allele was maintained on a mixed C57/Bl6/SV129 background and genotyped as described [18]. The Dscam mutant allele was genotyped as described [41].

RNA in situ hybridization, immunofluorescence, histology and electron microscopy

RNA in situ hybridization was performed as previously described [64] using a Dscam probe. Section immunofluorescence was conducted as previously described [42]. For staining of retinal flatmounts, eyes were dissected and the cornea, RPE, lens and blood vessels were removed before flattening the retina (GCL up) on Nucleopore® track-etched membranes (Whatman #110409). Flattened retinae were fixed with 1 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 1 hour at 4°C, and washed briefly in 1× PBS before blocking and incubation in 1° antibody in blocking solution for 5–7 days at 4°C on a rocker. Subsequent steps and antibodies were as described for section immunostaining [42]. Primary antibodies for immunostaining were to: PTEN (1[ratio]100, Cell Signalling #9559), TH (1[ratio]50, Santa Cruz #sc-14007), melanopsin (1[ratio]2500 wholemount, 1[ratio]5000 frozen sections, Advanced Targeting Systems #AB-N38), SMI-32 (1[ratio]250, Covance #SMI-32R), calbindin-D (1[ratio]500, Sigma #C-9848), ChAT (1[ratio]250, Chemicon #AB144P). For birthdating studies, intraperitoneal injections of 100 µg/g body weight BrdU (Sigma) were performed on timed staged pregnant females. For BrdU immunolabeling, sections were treated with 2 N HCl for 15 min at 37°C prior to processing. For histological staining, whole eyes were placed in Bouin's fixative and processed for paraffin sectioning and hematoxylin-eosin staining as described [65]. AP and β-gal staining was performed as described [30]. For EM, eyes were dissected and processed as described [66].

Western blotting

Retinae were lysed and Western blots performed as previously described [42]. Primary antibodies were to: pAktSer473 (1[ratio]1000, Cell Signalling #4060), total Akt (1[ratio]2000, Cell Signalling #9272), PTEN (1[ratio]1000, Cell Signalling #9559), pS6Ser235/236 (1[ratio]1000, Cell Signalling #4856), S6 (1[ratio]1000, Cell Signalling #2217), β-actin (1[ratio]5000, Abcam #8227), GAPDH (1[ratio]5000, Cell Signalling #2118).

ERG analyses

For ERG analyses, briefly, animals were dark-adapted for one hour and prepared for recordings under dim red light. Stimulation and acquisition were achieved by a commercial system (Espion E2 from Diagnosys LLC; flash duration 10 µs, bandpass filtering 0.3 Hz–3 Khz). ERGs were conducted as previously described [67], [68]. Scotopic intensity responses consisted of single flash presentations at 19 increasing flash strengths from −5.22 to 2.86 log cds/m2. For double flash ERGs, a probe flash (covering −1.6 to 2.9 log cds/m2) was presented 0.8 s after a conditioning flash (1.4 log cds/m2). Finally, photopic intensity responses (30 cd/m2 background light) consisted of 11 increasing flash strengths ranging from −1.6 to 2.9 log cds/m2. In addition to analysis of the a- and b-waves (amplitude and implicit time), three properties of the OPs (amplitude, frequency and latency) were quantified using Morlet wavelet transform [69].

Optokinetic Testing

Optokinetic testing was conducted as described [40]. Briefly, mice were placed on a platform centered in a chamber surrounded by four −17″ monitors, and the reflexive optokinetic response (OKR; head-turning) was elicited by a virtual-cylinder sine-wave grating moving leftward or rightward at constant velocity (OptoMotry™, Cerebral Mechanics Inc., Lethbridge, AB, Canada). The drift speed was constant at 12 degrees/second (d/s), contrast (Michelson contrast) ranged from 0 to 100%, and spatial frequencies ranged from 0.019 to 0.4 cycles/degree (c/d). Contrast threshold was defined as the lowest contrast at which an OKR could be elicited reliably by a grating of a given spatial frequency; contrast sensitivity was defined as the reciprocal of contrast threshold, in arbitrary units (100/[threshold % contrast]); and acuity was defined as the highest spatial frequency that reliably elicited an optokinetic response at 100% contrast (spatial frequency at contrast sensitivity = 1).

Measurements and statistical analysis

Photomicrographs of cells expressing cell type-specific marker(s) were used to count cell number/field. In all experiments, cells were counted from a minimum of 3 retinas. Somal areas of immunolabeled cells were calculated using Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). The Delunay-Voronoi plugin for Image J (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) was used for collecting the X-Y coordinates of TH+ amacrine and calbindin+ horizontal cells. These were exported to a customized program that computed the Voronoi tessellation of the field and the near neighbour distances of each individual cell (excluding cells with Voronoi domains that intersected the boundaries of a field), from which the regularity indices of the distribution of Voronoi areas and nearest neighbour distances were calculated (mean/standard deviation) [8]. Statistical significance for cell counts, cellular area, cellular spacing, western blotting densitometry, and optic nerve thickness were calculated using two-way Student's t-tests using GraphPad Prism Software version 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). All analyses were performed on a minimum of three eyes/genotype, and 3–10 photomicrographs/eye. See Tables S1, S2, S3, S4 for details and exact p-values for all tests. Analyses for ERGs was performed using repeated measures ANOVA (rmANOVA) in SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) with mouse genotype (wild-type versus Pten cKO) being used as the between-subject factor for either a main statistical difference or an interaction effect. See Table S3 for details and exact p-values for all tests. OKR behavioural analyses were carried out using a Mann-Whitney U-test for pooled wild-type versus Pten cKO mice and a linear mixed model (LMM) was used to analyse data when Pten cKO mice were placed in affected or unaffected categories. Genotype is included in the model as a fixed factor with 3 levels (wild-type versus affected or unaffected Pten cKO) in OKR data analysis. Post-hoc pair-wise comparison between genotypes was carried out using Least Significant Difference (LSD) with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons. See Table S4 for details and exact p-values for all tests. All graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism Software version 5.0 with error bars representing the standard error of the mean (s.e.m.).

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Ectopic RGC and amacrine cells in Pten cKO retinae. (A–D) Brn3a (A,B) and Pax6 (C,D) immunostaining of P7 retinal cross-sections in wild-type (A,C) and Pten cKO (B,D) retinas. Blue is DAPI counterstain. gcl, ganglion cell layer; inl, inner nuclear layer; ipl, inner plexiform layer; onl, outer nuclear layer; opl, outer plexiform layer. Scale bars = 50 µm.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Apoptosis is unaltered in Pten cKO retinae. (A–L) Active caspase-3 immunostaining at E15.5 (A–D′), P0 (E–H′) and P7 (I–L′) in wild-type (A–B′,E–F′,I–J′) and Pten cKO (C–D′,G–H′,K–L′) retinas. Blue is DAPI counterstain. gcl, ganglion cell layer; inl, inner nuclear layer; le, lens; onbl, outer neuroblast layer; onl, outer nuclear layer; re, retina. Scale bars = 300 µm (A,C), 600 µm (E,G,I,K).

(TIF)

Figure S3

Scotopic, photopic and double-flash ERG analysis of A-waves and B-waves in adult Pten cKO mice. (A–H) Scotopic A-wave amplitudes (A) and implicit times (B) in wild-type and Pten cKO mice. Scotopic B-wave amplitudes (C) and implicit times (D) in wild-type and Pten cKO mice. Photopic B-wave amplitudes (E) and implicit times (F) in wild-type and Pten cKO mice. Double-flash B-wave amplitudes (G) and implicit times (H) in wild-type and Pten cKO mice (wild-type is black; Pten cKO is red).

(TIF)

Figure S4

Photopic ERG oscillatory potential responses in Pten cKO animals. (A–F) Photopic ERG representative trace (A; wild-type is black; Pten cKO is red) and representative OP scalograms (B,C) at the flash intensity of 2.86 cd*s/m2. (D–F) Graphical representation of OP amplitude (D), frequency (E) and latency (F) across 11 steps (−1.63 to 2.86 cd*s/m2).

(TIF)

Table S1

Comparison of retinal cell sizes in wild-type and Pten cKO retinae.

(DOC)

Table S2

Analysis of horizontal and amacrine cell spacing and wholemount cell counts in P21 wild-type and Pten cKO retinal flatmounts.

(DOC)

Table S3

Analysis of electroretinogram responses in adult wild-type and Pten cKO mice.

(DOC)

Table S4

Analysis of optokinetic contrast sensitivity responses in adult wild-type and Pten cKO mice.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Deborah Kurrasch, Sarah McFarlane, Sarah Childs, William Brook, Jim McGhee and Valerie Wallace for helpful discussions and critical reading. We acknowledge Lin Ma, Marc-André Filion, Edward Parker, Pierre Mattar, Sarah Childs and Nicole Gruenig for technical and instructional assistance and Michelle Villemaire, Carol Huang, Frank Jirik, Tak Mak, Peter Stys, Roger Thompson, Doug Zochodne, Quentin Pittman, Sarah McFarlane and Lynda Erskine for reagents.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by operating grants to CS from the March of Dimes (1-FY08-356), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (MOP-89994), and a CIHR/Foundation Fighting Blindness (FFB) New Emerging Team grant (00933-000); a CIHR operating grant to AK (97758); a Discovery Grant and an Equipment Grant to WKS from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC); and a Core Grant for Vision Research (NIH EY01730) to ROW. CS and YS are Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) Senior Scholars. RC is supported by an FFB studentship and was supported by a CIHR Training Grant. RD was supported by a CIHR Canada HOPE Fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Galli-Resta L, Leone P, Bottari D, Ensini M, Rigosi E, et al. The genesis of retinal architecture: an emerging role for mechanical interactions? Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27:260–283. [PubMed]
2. Grueber WB, Sagasti A. Self-avoidance and tiling: Mechanisms of dendrite and axon spacing. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a001750. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Zolessi FR, Poggi L, Wilkinson CJ, Chien CB, Harris WA. Polarization and orientation of retinal ganglion cells in vivo. Neural Dev. 2006;1:2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Poggi L, Vitorino M, Masai I, Harris WA. Influences on neural lineage and mode of division in the zebrafish retina in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:991–999. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Halfter W, Dong S, Balasubramani M, Bier ME. Temporary disruption of the retinal basal lamina and its effect on retinal histogenesis. Dev Biol. 2001;238:79–96. [PubMed]
6. Rockhill RL, Euler T, Masland RH. Spatial order within but not between types of retinal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:2303–2307. [PubMed]
7. Reese BE. Mosaic architecture of the mouse retina. In: Chalupa LM, Williams RW, editors. Eye, Retina and Visual Systems of the Mouse. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008. pp. 147–155.
8. Reese BE. Mosaics, Tiling and Coverage by Retinal Neurons. The senses: a comprehensive reference. San Diego: Elsevier; 2008. pp. 439–456.
9. Fuerst PG, Koizumi A, Masland RH, Burgess RW. Neurite arborization and mosaic spacing in the mouse retina require DSCAM. Nature. 2008;451:470–474. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Fuerst PG, Burgess RW. Adhesion molecules in establishing retinal circuitry. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009;19:389–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Fuerst PG, Bruce F, Tian M, Wei W, Elstrott J, et al. DSCAM and DSCAML1 function in self-avoidance in multiple cell types in the developing mouse retina. Neuron. 2009;64:484–497. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Fuerst PG, Harris BS, Johnson KR, Burgess RW. A novel null allele of mouse DSCAM survives to adulthood on an inbred C3H background with reduced phenotypic variability. Genesis. 2010;48:578–584. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Keeley PW, Sliff B, Lee SC, Fuerst PG, Burgess RW, et al. Neuronal clustering and fasciculation phenotype in dscam- and bax-deficient mouse retinas. J Comp Neurol. 2011 doi: 10.1002/cne.23027. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Yamagata M, Sanes JR. Dscam and Sidekick proteins direct lamina-specific synaptic connections in vertebrate retina. Nature. 2008;451:465–469. [PubMed]
15. Deans MR, Krol A, Abraira VE, Copley CO, Tucker AF, et al. Control of neuronal morphology by the atypical cadherin Fat3. Neuron. 2011;71:820–832. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Matsuoka RL, Nguyen-Ba-Charvet KT, Parray A, Badea TC, Chedotal A, et al. Transmembrane semaphorin signalling controls laminar stratification in the mammalian retina. Nature. 2011;470:259–263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Marino S, Krimpenfort P, Leung C, van der Korput HA, Trapman J, et al. PTEN is essential for cell migration but not for fate determination and tumourigenesis in the cerebellum. Development. 2002;129:3513–3522. [PubMed]
18. Backman SA, Stambolic V, Suzuki A, Haight J, Elia A, et al. Deletion of Pten in mouse brain causes seizures, ataxia and defects in soma size resembling Lhermitte-Duclos disease. Nat Genet. 2001;29:396–403. [PubMed]
19. Kwon CH, Zhu X, Zhang J, Knoop LL, Tharp R, et al. Pten regulates neuronal soma size: a mouse model of Lhermitte-Duclos disease. Nat Genet. 2001;29:404–411. [PubMed]
20. Comer FI, Parent CA. Phosphoinositides specify polarity during epithelial organ development. Cell. 2007;128:239–240. [PubMed]
21. Stambolic V, Suzuki A, de la Pompa JL, Brothers GM, Mirtsos C, et al. Negative regulation of PKB/Akt-dependent cell survival by the tumor suppressor PTEN. Cell. 1998;95:29–39. [PubMed]
22. Lehtinen MK, Zappaterra MW, Chen X, Yang YJ, Hill AD, et al. The cerebrospinal fluid provides a proliferative niche for neural progenitor cells. Neuron. 2011;69:893–905. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Groszer M, Erickson R, Scripture-Adams DD, Lesche R, Trumpp A, et al. Negative regulation of neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation by the Pten tumor suppressor gene in vivo. Science. 2001;294:2186–2189. [PubMed]
24. Kwon CH, Luikart BW, Powell CM, Zhou J, Matheny SA, et al. Pten regulates neuronal arborization and social interaction in mice. Neuron. 2006;50:377–388. [PubMed]
25. Yue Q, Groszer M, Gil JS, Berk AJ, Messing A, et al. PTEN deletion in Bergmann glia leads to premature differentiation and affects laminar organization. Development. 2005;132:3281–3291. [PubMed]
26. Fraser MM, Bayazitov IT, Zakharenko SS, Baker SJ. Phosphatase and tensin homolog, deleted on chromosome 10 deficiency in brain causes defects in synaptic structure, transmission and plasticity, and myelination abnormalities. Neuroscience. 2008;151:476–488. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Pimentel B, Rodriguez-Borlado L, Hernandez C, Carrera AC. A Role for phosphoinositide 3-kinase in the control of cell division and survival during retinal development. Dev Biol. 2002;247:295–306. [PubMed]
28. Sakagami K, Chen B, Nusinowitz S, Wu H, Yang XJ. PTEN regulates retinal interneuron morphogenesis and synaptic layer formation. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011;49:171–183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Marquardt T, Ashery-Padan R, Andrejewski N, Scardigli R, Guillemot F, et al. Pax6 is required for the multipotent state of retinal progenitor cells. Cell. 2001;105:43–55. [PubMed]
30. Lobe CG, Koop KE, Kreppner W, Lomeli H, Gertsenstein M, et al. Z/AP, a double reporter for cre-mediated recombination. Dev Biol. 1999;208:281–292. [PubMed]
31. Kwon CH, Zhu X, Zhang J, Baker SJ. mTor is required for hypertrophy of Pten-deficient neuronal soma in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12923–12928. [PubMed]
32. Wassle H, Riemann HJ. The mosaic of nerve cells in the mammalian retina. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978;200:441–461. [PubMed]
33. Reese BE, Galli-Resta L. The role of tangential dispersion in retinal mosaic formation. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21:153–168. [PubMed]
34. Raven MA, Eglen SJ, Ohab JJ, Reese BE. Determinants of the exclusion zone in dopaminergic amacrine cell mosaics. J Comp Neurol. 2003;461:123–136. [PubMed]
35. Galli-Resta L, Resta G, Tan SS, Reese BE. Mosaics of islet-1-expressing amacrine cells assembled by short-range cellular interactions. J Neurosci. 1997;17:7831–7838. [PubMed]
36. Young RW. Cell differentiation in the retina of the mouse. Anat Rec. 1985;212:199–205. [PubMed]
37. Akula JD, Mocko JA, Moskowitz A, Hansen RM, Fulton AB. The oscillatory potentials of the dark-adapted electroretinogram in retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5788–5797. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Lukasiewicz PD. Synaptic mechanisms that shape visual signaling at the inner retina. Prog Brain Res. 2005;147:205–218. [PubMed]
39. Badea TC, Cahill H, Ecker J, Hattar S, Nathans J. Distinct roles of transcription factors brn3a and brn3b in controlling the development, morphology, and function of retinal ganglion cells. Neuron. 2009;61:852–864. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Prusky GT, Alam NM, Beekman S, Douglas RM. Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4611–4616. [PubMed]
41. Amano K, Fujii M, Arata S, Tojima T, Ogawa M, et al. DSCAM deficiency causes loss of pre-inspiratory neuron synchroneity and perinatal death. J Neurosci. 2009;29:2984–2996. [PubMed]
42. Ma L, Cantrup R, Varrault A, Colak D, Klenin N, et al. Zac1 functions through TGFbetaII to negatively regulate cell number in the developing retina. Neural Dev. 2007;2:11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Godinho L, Mumm JS, Williams PR, Schroeter EH, Koerber A, et al. Targeting of amacrine cell neurites to appropriate synaptic laminae in the developing zebrafish retina. Development. 2005;132:5069–5079. [PubMed]
44. Hollander MC, Blumenthal GM, Dennis PA. PTEN loss in the continuum of common cancers, rare syndromes and mouse models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:289–301. [PubMed]
45. Nguyen KT, Tajmir P, Lin CH, Liadis N, Zhu XD, et al. Essential role of Pten in body size determination and pancreatic beta-cell homeostasis in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:4511–4518. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Backman SA, Ghazarian D, So K, Sanchez O, Wagner KU, et al. Early onset of neoplasia in the prostate and skin of mice with tissue-specific deletion of Pten. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:1725–1730. [PubMed]
47. Backman S, Stambolic V, Mak T. PTEN function in mammalian cell size regulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:516–522. [PubMed]
48. Park KK, Liu K, Hu Y, Smith PD, Wang C, et al. Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway. Science. 2008;322:963–966. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Kurimoto T, Yin Y, Omura K, Gilbert HY, Kim D, et al. Long-distance axon regeneration in the mature optic nerve: contributions of oncomodulin, cAMP, and pten gene deletion. J Neurosci. 2010;30:15654–15663. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Godinho L, Williams PR, Claassen Y, Provost E, Leach SD, et al. Nonapical symmetric divisions underlie horizontal cell layer formation in the developing retina in vivo. Neuron. 2007;56:597–603. [PubMed]
51. Huckfeldt RM, Schubert T, Morgan JL, Godinho L, Di Cristo G, et al. Transient neurites of retinal horizontal cells exhibit columnar tiling via homotypic interactions. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:35–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Kim JW, Kang KH, Burrola P, Mak TW, Lemke G. Retinal degeneration triggered by inactivation of PTEN in the retinal pigment epithelium. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3147–3157. [PubMed]
53. Masai I, Lele Z, Yamaguchi M, Komori A, Nakata A, et al. N-cadherin mediates retinal lamination, maintenance of forebrain compartments and patterning of retinal neurites. Development. 2003;130:2479–2494. [PubMed]
54. Erdmann B, Kirsch FP, Rathjen FG, More MI. N-cadherin is essential for retinal lamination in the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2003;226:570–577. [PubMed]
55. Matthews BJ, Kim ME, Flanagan JJ, Hattori D, Clemens JC, et al. Dendrite self-avoidance is controlled by Dscam. Cell. 2007;129:593–604. [PubMed]
56. Hughes ME, Bortnick R, Tsubouchi A, Baumer P, Kondo M, et al. Homophilic Dscam interactions control complex dendrite morphogenesis. Neuron. 2007;54:417–427. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Keeley PW, Reese BE. Morphology of dopaminergic amacrine cells in the mouse retina: independence from homotypic interactions. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:1220–1231. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Song MS, Carracedo A, Salmena L, Song SJ, Egia A, et al. Nuclear PTEN regulates the APC-CDH1 tumor-suppressive complex in a phosphatase-independent manner. Cell. 2011;144:187–199. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Basile JR, Afkhami T, Gutkind JS. Semaphorin 4D/plexin-B1 induces endothelial cell migration through the activation of PYK2, Src, and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:6889–6898. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Oinuma I, Ito Y, Katoh H, Negishi M. Semaphorin 4D/Plexin-B1 stimulates PTEN activity through R-Ras GTPase-activating protein activity, inducing growth cone collapse in hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:28200–28209. [PubMed]
61. Luikart BW, Schnell E, Washburn EK, Bensen AL, Tovar KR, et al. Pten Knockdown In Vivo Increases Excitatory Drive onto Dentate Granule Cells. J Neurosci. 2011;31:4345–4354. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Sperow M, Berry RB, Bayazitov IT, Zhu G, Baker SJ, et al. PTEN regulates synaptic plasticity independently of its effect on neuronal morphology and migration. J Physiol 2011 [PubMed]
63. Yoshida K, Watanabe D, Ishikane H, Tachibana M, Pastan I, et al. A key role of starburst amacrine cells in originating retinal directional selectivity and optokinetic eye movement. Neuron. 2001;30:771–780. [PubMed]
64. Alam S, Zinyk D, Ma L, Schuurmans C. Members of the Plag gene family are expressed in complementary and overlapping regions in the developing murine nervous system. Dev Dyn. 2005;234:772–782. [PubMed]
65. Fode C, Gradwohl G, Morin X, Dierich A, LeMeur M, et al. The bHLH protein NEUROGENIN 2 is a determination factor for epibranchial placode-derived sensory neurons. Neuron. 1998;20:483–494. [PubMed]
66. Kerschensteiner D, Morgan JL, Parker ED, Lewis RM, Wong RO. Neurotransmission selectively regulates synapse formation in parallel circuits in vivo. Nature. 2009;460:1016–1020. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Pinilla I, Lund RD, Sauve Y. Contribution of rod and cone pathways to the dark-adapted electroretinogram (ERG) b-wave following retinal degeneration in RCS rats. Vision Res. 2004;44:2467–2474. [PubMed]
68. Sauve Y, Pinilla I, Lund RD. Partial preservation of rod and cone ERG function following subretinal injection of ARPE-19 cells in RCS rats. Vision Res. 2006;46:1459–1472. [PubMed]
69. Forte JD, Bui BV, Vingrys AJ. Wavelet analysis reveals dynamics of rat oscillatory potentials. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;169:191–200. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science