PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
World J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 25, 2013.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3292668
NIHMSID: NIHMS339181
Epidemiologic Profile, Sexual History, Pathologic Features, and Human Papillomavirus Status of 103 Patients with Penile Carcinoma
Alcides Chaux, MD,1,2 George J. Netto, MD,2 Ingrid M. Rodríguez, MD,1 José E. Barreto, MD,1 Judith Oertell, MD,1 Sandra Ocampos, MD,1 Hugo Boggino, MD,1 Ricardo Codas, MD,1 F. Xavier Bosch, MD, PhD, MPH,3 Silvia de Sanjose, MD, PhD,3,4 Nubia Muñoz, MD,3 Allan Hildesheim, PhD,5 and Antonio L. Cubilla, MD1
1Instituto de Patología e Investigación, Asunción, Paraguay
2Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD
3Institut Català d’Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
4CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Pública, Spain
5Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD
Corresponding Author: Alcides Chaux, MD. Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 401 N Broadway/Weinberg 2242, Baltimore, MD 21231. Phone: 1-410-955-5082. Fax: 1-443-287-3818. achaux1/at/jhmi.edu
PURPOSE
The incidence of penile cancer is four times higher in Paraguay than in the United States or Europe. There are no adequate scientific explanations for this geographical variation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the interplay among risk factors, morphology of the primary tumor, and HPV status.
METHODS
Information on socioeconomic status, education level, habits, and sexual history was obtained in 103 Paraguayan patients with penile cancer. All patients were then treated by surgery and specimens were evaluated histopathologically.
RESULTS
Patients usually dwelled in rural/suburban areas (82%), lived in poverty (75%), had a low education level (91%), and were heavy smokers (76%). Phimosis (57%), moderate/poor hygienic habits (90%), and history of sexually-transmitted diseases (74%) were frequently found. Patients with >10 lifetime female partners had an odds ratio of 3.8 (95% CI 1.1, 12.6; P-trend = .03) for presenting HPV positive tumors when compared to patients with <6 partners. However, this trend was not significant when the number of sexual partners was adjusted for age of first coitus and antecedents of sexually-transmitted diseases. HPV-related tumors (found in 36% of the samples) were characterized by a warty and/or basaloid morphology and high histological grade in most cases.
CONCLUSIONS
In our series, patients with penile cancer presented a distinctive epidemiological and pathological profile. These data might help explaining the geographical differences in incidence and aid in the design of strategies for cancer control in Paraguay.
Keywords: penile cancer, human papillomavirus, circumcision, phimosis, lichen sclerosus, risk factors
Penile cancer is rare in most developed areas of the world. However, the age-standardized incidence rate per 100,000 inhabitants (ASR) is widely variable depending on the geographical region under consideration. In North America and Europe it ranges from 0.1–1.0 while certain African and South American countries show a two or three-fold increased incidence [1,2]. In this regard, the ASR of penile carcinoma in Paraguay is among the highest worldwide, with a reported value of 4.2, according to last available data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [2]. There are no adequate scientific explanations for this geographical variation but known risk factors, such as lack of circumcision, phimosis, smoking, a history of penile tears, chronic inflammatory conditions, poor genital hygiene, and the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection [3], might be more prevalent in areas with a higher incidence.
Similarly to vulvar and head and neck carcinomas [5,6], penile cancer seems to follow a bimodal pathogenic pathway, one associated with and the other unrelated to HPV infection [7,8]. Unlike uterine cervical cancers, in which most tumors are HPV-related, only 30–50% of penile cancers show evidence of HPV infection [4,8,9]. The association between HPV and histological subtype of penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been evaluated [10] but we found no prospective studies assessing these and other pathologic features taking also into account demographics and clinical data, including life-style habits and sexual history. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the interplay among known epidemiological risk factors, morphologic features of the primary tumor, and HPV status in a prospective cohort of penile cancer patients from Paraguay.
An ad hoc Institutional Review Board at the School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Asunción (Asunción, Paraguay) approved the study protocol, in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Case Selection and Data Acquisition
Between 1993 and 2007, a questionnaire was prospectively administered to 103 Paraguayan patients with penile cancer. Cases were originally diagnosed and treated in Paraguayan clinics and hospitals from the public sector. Senior medical students and pathology residents conducted the interviews before implementation of any form of treatment. Foreskin length was determined following previously published criteria [11]. Hygienic habits were determined by combining data on frequency of genital washes (daily washes, nondaily washes but more than 1 wash per week, and less than 1 wash per week) and self-reported presence of smegma (almost never, sometimes, and frequent). All patients were treated by either partial/total penectomy or circumcision. Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 25 patients at the time of or within 30 days from primary surgery for clinically-apparent nodal involvement.
Pathologic Evaluation
Classification of preneoplastic lesions and invasive tumors was done according to the criteria proposed in the AFIP Atlas of Tumor Pathology [12]. The aforementioned criteria include the criteria used for the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of penile tumors, in addition to criteria for the diagnosis of recently-described pathologic entities. Histologic grading was carried out using previously published criteria [13].
Immunohistochemistry for p16INK4a (CINtec®, MTM Laboratories AG, Heidelberg, Germany) was carried out in 88 patients. Tumor tissue for HPV detection and genotypification was available in 89 cases and it was done by SPF-10 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Li-PA25 version 1 (Labo Biomedical Products, Rijswijk, the Netherlands), at the Institut Català d’Oncologia (Barcelona, Spain), following a previously described protocol [9].
Statistical Analysis
Variables were compared using the Fisher’s exact or the Student’s t-test. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using binary logistic regression. In all cases, a 2-tailed P < 0.05 was required for statistical significance. Data were analyzed using the software PASW version 18.0 (IBM Inc., Somers, NY).
Epidemiologic and Clinical Features
The majority of patients lived in rural or suburban regions and received only elementary education (≤6 years of school). The gross familial income was below the minimal wage in most cases. Socioeconomic data are summarized in Table 1, section A.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1
Socioeconomic, Clinical, and Pathologic Profile of 103 Patients with Penile Cancer
Mean age of patients was 62 years. Most patients reported past or present consumption of tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, and 55% of them still held the habit. Long foreskins and phimosis were detected in about one half of all patients. Circumcision was done in a minority of patients for medical reasons, such as chronic inflammation or phimosis. Most patients reported moderate to poor genital hygienic habits. A previous history of STD was reported by 76% of patients. These and other data (including sexual history) are summarized in Table 1, section B.
Pathological Features
Pathological data are summarized in Table 1, section C. Most tumors were clinically advanced and located in the distal penis, affecting multiple epithelial compartments in more than one half of the cases. When limited to one anatomical compartment, glans was more frequently affected, followed by inner foreskin. Invasive carcinomas predominated over in situ lesions (98% vs. 2%). The predominant histologic subtype was usual SCC (32%), followed by mixed SCC (18%), basaloid carcinoma (12%), and papillary carcinoma (11%). Warty and warty-basaloid carcinomas were less frequently found (7% and 6%). Other subtypes included pseudohyperplastic (4%), verrucous (3%), sarcomatoid (3%), multicentric usual & verrucous (2%), cuniculatum (1%), and clear cell (1%) carcinomas. Inguinal nodal metastases were found in 18 patients (72% of all patients who received groin dissections). Differentiated PeIN was the most common preneoplastic lesion found, followed by PeIN with warty and/or basaloid features, and mixed PeIN. Lichen sclerosus was observed in about two-third of the cases. Overexpression of p16INK4a in invasive carcinomas was observed in 24% of the cases. HPV DNA was detected in 36% of the analyzed tissue samples.
Epidemiological, Clinical, and Pathologic Features and HPV status
Epidemiologic, clinical, and pathological features of patients with penile cancer according to HPV status are presented in Table 2. No significant differences in socioeconomic features were noted. Among the clinical features, only the mean number of lifetime female sexual partners was different between these two groups, with a higher value in patients with HPV positive tumors.
TABLE 2
TABLE 2
Socioeconomic, Clinical, and Pathological Features of Penile Cancer Patients by HPV Status
HPV positive tumors tended to show warty and/or basaloid features, to correspond to a higher histological grade, and to be associated with subtypes of PeIN depicting similar morphological features as their invasive counterparts. HPV negative carcinomas were usually well to moderately differentiated tumors, frequently associated with differentiated PeIN and lichen sclerosus. Overexpression of p16INK4a was more prevalent in HPV positive tumors (Figure 1). Anatomical location of the primary tumor was similar in both groups of patients. Metastatic ratios were not significantly different in HPV positive and HPV negative tumors (60% vs 79%, P = .57).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Morphological features of HPV-related penile tumors
The comparison of epidemiologic and clinical risk factors of the patients according to HPV status disclosed similar features, except for the categorized number of lifetime sexual female partners (Table 3). The risk for HPV positive penile tumors was almost 4 times higher among patients with >10 lifetime female partners compared to individuals with <6 partners. However, this trend lost significance when the covariate was adjusted for age of first coitus and antecedents of STD (OR 1.75; 95% CI 0.96, 3.19; P = .067).
TABLE 3
TABLE 3
Socio-Demographic, Sexual, and Behavioral Risk Factors for HPV-Related Penile Cancer, Compared to HPV Negative Cases
In this prospective study we are reporting the socioeconomic profile, presence of risk factors, sexual history, tumor morphologic features, and HPV status of patients with penile carcinomas. The epidemiological characteristics are those already described in other studies [1416]. The majority of penile cancer patients in Paraguay were from rural or suburban areas. This represents a demographic change considering that, in a previous report from the 1960’s, most patients lived in rural regions [17]. This shift might be related to a recent significant migration from rural to suburban areas. However, suburban people, unlike their counterparts in developed nations, live under harsh conditions and are culturally and socioeconomically underserved, similar to rural patients. In countries where 20% or more of the population live in poverty, such is the case in Paraguay, the risk for penile cancer is 43% higher than in countries with less than 10% poverty levels [16].
The majority of our patients (76%) were heavy smokers. There is a clear dose response relation of smoking with penile cancer. Previous studies have shown that patients smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day, as the majority of our patients, had a significantly higher risk than light smokers [14]. In a recent series, Koifman et al [18] also found a high incidence of smoking among Brazilian penile cancer patients (56.5%). Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms and precise role that smoking plays in penile cancer development is largely unknown.
The “foreskin factor” is important in penile cancer oncogenesis since there is strong evidence that circumcision at birth, as it is ritually practiced in the Jewish, Muslin, and other populations, prevents its occurrence [3]. Most of the Paraguayan patients in this study were uncircumcised. The few individuals reporting a history of previous circumcision (10%) had the procedure performed within the context of a symptomatic medical condition. Circumcision was also uncommon in Brazilian patients, according to Koifman et al [18]. Some studies suggest that circumcision practiced at adulthood, even in those cases done by religious or cultural reasons, instead of protecting against, is associated with an increased risk of penile cancer, especially when extensive scaring develops [19]. A possible explanation for this seemly contradictory phenomenon could be related to the development of the scar itself or to the presence of subclinical penile lesions at the time of the procedure.
The protective effect of newborn circumcision is probably linked to the prevention of phimosis [3]. In an early study, Hellberg et al reported a relative risk of 64.6 for penile cancer among men with phimosis [20]. Following this study, several others have confirmed the role of phimosis as a risk factor for tumor development [14,3]. The high prevalence of difficulty in retracting the foreskin we found (57%) is similar to the figures reported in Northeastern Brazil by Favorito et al [21]. A frequent association of phimosis with lichen sclerosus in our series (74%) suggests a causal link. Other interesting findings were those related to the sexual history of patients with penile cancer. As an unadjusted covariate, patients with a sexual history of > 10 lifetime female partners were more prone to present HPV positive tumors. A similar trend has been reported in women in regards to the risk of cervical carcinomas [22].
One possible limitation of the present study is the lack of an age-matched control group for patients with penile cancer. However, this study was designed to explore the association of pathologic features of penile tumors with clinical and epidemiologic features of the targeted population. We did not aim to identify or evaluate risk factors for the development of penile cancer in the general population. In this sense, we built upon previously recognized risk factors, such as smoking, foreskin features, circumcision status, and sexual history [3,14,12,20]. Studies with similar designs to our design are scant, especially from regions of high prevalence. Our results could help unravel the complex pathogenesis of penile cancer and contribute in the understanding of its differential distribution across different geographical regions.
In summary, we have described the epidemiological, clinical, and pathological profile of patients with penile SCC in Paraguay, a geographical region with one of the highest rates in penile cancer. Patients usually lived in rural/suburban areas, in poverty, and had a low education level. Most of them were heavy smokers. Circumcision was uncommon and, when practiced, was related to the presence of medical conditions. Long foreskins and moderate/poor genital hygienic habits were also frequently found, as well as a high reported history of sexually transmitted diseases. HPV-related tumors were characterized by a warty and/or basaloid morphology, high histological grade, and association with precursor lesions showing similar features to their invasive counterparts while HPV negative tumors were well to moderately differentiated SCC, frequently associated with lichen sclerosus and differentiated PeIN. These data might help in the development of strategies for penile cancer control in Paraguay.
Acknowledgments
Disclosure: Dr Chaux was supported by the Johns Hopkins Medicine – Patana Fund for Research
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
1. Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, Boyle P. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. IX. IARC Scientific Publications No. 160. Lyon: IARC Press; 2007. pp. 570–573.
2. Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, Gao YT, Ferlay J, Powell J. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. VI. IARC Scientific Publications No. 120. vol Book, Whole. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 1992.
3. Bleeker MC, Heideman DA, Snijders PJ, Horenblas S, Dillner J, Meijer CJ. Penile cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention. World J Urol. 2009;27(2):141–150. [PubMed]
4. Gregoire L, Cubilla AL, Reuter VE, Haas GP, Lancaster WD. Preferential association of human papillomavirus with high-grade histologic variants of penile-invasive squamous cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(22):1705–1709. [PubMed]
5. Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, Franceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(2):467–475. [PubMed]
6. Ueda Y, Enomoto T, Kimura T, Yoshino K, Fujita M. Two distinct pathways to development of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Skin Cancer. 2011;2011:951250. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Backes DM, Kurman RJ, Pimenta JM, Smith JS. Systematic review of human papillomavirus prevalence in invasive penile cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(4):449–457. [PubMed]
8. Rubin MA, Kleter B, Zhou M, Ayala G, Cubilla AL, Quint WG, Pirog EC. Detection and typing of human papillomavirus DNA in penile carcinoma: evidence for multiple independent pathways of penile carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2001;159(4):1211–1218. [PubMed]
9. Cubilla AL, Lloveras B, Alejo M, Clavero O, Chaux A, Kasamatsu E, Velazquez EF, Lezcano C, Monfulleda N, Tous S, Alemany L, Klaustermeier J, Munoz N, Quint W, de Sanjose S, Bosch FX. The basaloid cell is the best tissue marker for human papillomavirus in invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma: A study of 202 cases from Paraguay. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(1):104–114. [PubMed]
10. Miralles-Guri C, Bruni L, Cubilla AL, Castellsague X, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S. Human papillomavirus prevalence and type distribution in penile carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62(10):870–878. [PubMed]
11. Velazquez EF, Bock A, Soskin A, Codas R, Arbo M, Cubilla AL. Preputial variability and preferential association of long phimotic foreskins with penile cancer: an anatomic comparative study of types of foreskin in a general population and cancer patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(7):994–998. [PubMed]
12. Epstein JH, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA. Atlas of Tumor Pathology. vol Book, Whole. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 2011. Tumors of the Prostate Gland, Seminal Vesicles, Penis, and Scrotum; pp. 405–612.
13. Chaux A, Torres J, Pfannl R, Barreto J, Rodriguez I, Velazquez EF, Cubilla AL. Histologic grade in penile squamous cell carcinoma: Visual estimation versus digital measurement of proportions of grades, adverse prognosis with any proportion of grade 3 and correlation of a Gleason-like system with nodal metastasis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(7):1042–1048. [PubMed]
14. Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, Schwartz SM, Shera KA, Wurscher MA, Carter JJ, Porter PL, Galloway DA, McDougall JK, Krieger JN. Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(4):606–616. [PubMed]
15. Goodman MT, Hernandez BY, Shvetsov YB. Demographic and pathologic differences in the incidence of invasive penile cancer in the United States 1995–2003. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(9):1833–1839. [PubMed]
16. Hernandez BY, Barnholtz-Sloan J, German RR, Giuliano A, Goodman MT, King JB, Negoita S, Villalon-Gomez JM. Burden of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States 1998–2003. Cancer. 2008;113(10 Suppl):2883–2891. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Riveros M, Lebron RF. Geographical pathology of cancer of the penis. Cancer. 1963;16:798–811. (Journal Article) [PubMed]
18. Koifman L, Vides AJ, Koifman N, Carvalho JP, Ornellas AA. Epidemiological aspects of penile cancer in Rio de Janeiro: evaluation of 230 cases. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37(2):231–240. discussion 240–233. doi:IBJUv37n2a9 [pii] [PubMed]
19. Seyam RM, Bissada NK, Mokhtar AA, Mourad WA, Aslam M, Elkum N, Kattan SA, Hanash KA. Outcome of penile cancer in circumcised men. J Urol. 2006;175(2):557–561. [PubMed]
20. Hellberg D, Valentin J, Eklund T, Nilsson S. Penile cancer: is there an epidemiological role for smoking and sexual behaviour? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987;295(6609):1306–1308. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Favorito LA, Nardi AC, Ronalsa M, Zequi SC, Sampaio FJ, Glina S. Epidemiologic study on penile cancer in Brazil. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34(5):587–591. [PubMed]
22. Bosch FX, de Sanjose S. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Dis Markers. 2007;23(4):213–227. [PubMed]