PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 August 16.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3292258
NIHMSID: NIHMS343991

Brassinosteroid regulates stomatal development by GSK3-mediated inhibition of a MAPK pathway

Abstract

Plants must coordinately regulate biochemistry and anatomy to optimize photosynthesis and water use efficiency. The formation of stomata, epidermal pores facilitating gas exchange, is highly coordinated with other aspects of photosynthetic development. However, the signaling pathways controlling stomata development are not fully understood1,2, although Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) signaling is known to play key roles. Here we demonstrate that brassinosteroid (BR) regulates stomatal development by activating the MAPKKK, YODA. Genetic analyses indicate that receptor kinase-mediated BR signaling inhibits development through the GSK3-like kinase BIN2, and BIN2 acts upstream of YODA but downstream of the known ERECTA family of stomatal receptor kinases. Complementary in vitro and in vivo assays show that BIN2 phosphorylates YODA to inhibit YODA phosphorylation of its substrate MKK4, and activities of downstream MAPKs are reduced in BR-deficient mutants but increased by treatment with either BR or GSK3-kinase inhibitor. Our results indicate that BR inhibits stomatal development by alleviating GSK3-mediated inhibition of the MAPK module, providing two key links; that of a plant MAPKKK to its upstream regulators and BR to a specific developmental output.

In both animals and plants, steroid hormones play important roles in coordinating development and metabolism4. In contrast to animal steroid hormones, which act through nuclear receptor transcription factors4, the plant steroid hormone brassinosteroid (BR) binds to the extracellular domain of the membrane-bound receptor kinase BRI1. This activates intracellular signal transduction mediated by BSK1 kinase, BSU1 phosphatase, BIN2 (GSK3-like) kinase, PP2A phosphatase, and BZR1-family transcription factors3,7,8,9,10,11,12. When BR levels are low, BZR1 is inactivated due to phosphorylation by the GSK3-like kinase BIN213,14. BR signaling leads to inactivation of BIN2, and PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation and activation of BZR13,11,12 (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Although the BR signaling pathway is well characterized, its connections to other signaling and developmental pathways are not fully understood.

Stomata are epidermal pores that control gas exchange between the plant and the atmosphere and are critical for maintaining photosynthetic and water-use efficiency in the plant. The density and distribution of stomata in the epidermis of aerial organs is modulated by intrinsic developmental programs, by hormones, and by environmental factors such as light, humidity, and carbon dioxide1,2,15,16. The genetically-defined signaling pathway that regulates stomatal development includes peptide ligands, a receptor protein (TMM), the ERECTA family (ERf) of receptor-like kinases (ER, ERL1 and ERL2) and a MAPK module (MAPKKK: YDA, MAPKKs: MKK4/5/7/9, and MAPKs: MPK3/6)17. Potential downstream targets include bHLH transcription factors SPEECHLESS (SPCH), MUTE, FAMA, ICE1/SCRM and SCRM2, with SPCH being negatively regulated by direct MPK3/6-mediated phosphoregulation18,19 (Supplementary Fig. 1B). The MAPK pathway could potentially integrate environmental and hormonal inputs to optimized stomatal production, but nothing is known about the nature of these signals and their biochemical mechanisms of MAPK pathway regulation.

Excess stomata have been observed in some BR-deficient mutants5. To elucidate the function of BR in regulating stomatal development, we examined the distribution of stomata on leaves of BR-deficient and BR-signaling mutants. In wild-type Arabidopsis, stomata are always distributed with at least one pavement cell between them (Fig. 1a). BR deficiency causes stomatal clusters (Fig. 1b and 1c), whereas treatment with brassinolide (BL, the most active form of BR) reduces stomatal density (Fig. 1d), indicating that BR represses stomatal development. The BR-insensitive mutants bri1-116, quadruple amiRNA BSL2,3;bsu1;bsl1 (bsu-q)11, dominant bin2-1, and BIN2-overexpressing plants also exhibit stomatal clustering (Fig. 1e–h), and overproduce stomatal precursors (meristemoids and guard mother cells) (Fig. 1u and Supplementary Fig. 2). In contrast to the weak stomatal clustering phenotype of the det2-1 and bri1-116 mutants, bsu-q showed large stomatal clusters on hypocotyls (Supplementary Fig. 4) and cotyledon surfaces consisting almost entirely of stomata (Fig. 1f, u and Supplementary Fig. 2, 3). Surprisingly, the hyperactive bzr1-1D mutation12,20 did not affect stomatal development or suppress the stomatal phenotypes of bri1-116, bsu-q and bin2-1, although it suppressed their dwarf phenotypes (Fig. 1i–n and Supplementary Fig. 5). These results indicate that BR regulation of stomatal development is mediated by upstream signaling components including BRI1, BSU1, and BIN2, but is independent of the BIN2-substrate BZR1.

Figure. 1
BR negatively regulates stomatal development

Consistent with increased stomatal development in BR-insensitive mutants, fewer stomata were observed in cotyledons of plants overexpressing some of the positive BR-signaling components of the BSU1 family (Fig. 1q, u and Supplementary Fig. 6) and in bin2-3;bil1;bil2 loss-of-function mutants lacking 3/7 BR-signaling GSK3-like kinases (Fig. 1o, p, u and Supplementary Fig. 2). We used bikinin, a highly specific inhibitor for the 7 Arabidopsis GSK3-like kinases that appear to be involved in BR signaling21,11,22, to further investigate the function of BR-related GSK3-like kinases in stomatal development. When added to the growth medium, bikinin decreased stomatal production in wild-type plants, fully suppressed the stomatal clustering phenotypes of bin2-1, and significantly suppressed the severe stomatal phenotypes of bsu-q (Fig. 1r–u). These results confirm that increased activity of the GSK3-like kinases is responsible for enhanced stomatal production in BR-deficient and BR-insensitive mutants.

We examined genetic interactions between BR mutants and known stomatal mutants. Expression of constitutively-active YDA (CA-YDA) can completely eliminate stomatal development23 (Fig. 2a), likely via activation of a MAP kinase pathway that phosphorylates and inactivates SPCH17,18. Expression of CA-YDA completely suppressed stomatal development of the bri1-116, bsu-q and bin2-1 mutants (Fig. 2b–d). Loss of SPCH was also completely epistatic to bsu-q in that a bsu-q;spch-3 (null) mutant lacked stomata and precursors (Fig. 2e, f), indicating that the BR signaling components act upstream of the canonical stomatal MAP kinase pathway. Bikinin effectively suppressed the weak stomatal clustering phenotype of tmm and partially suppressed the severe phenotype of er;erl1;erl2 triple mutants (Fig. 2g, h and Supplementary Fig. 7 and 8), but had no significant effect on the phenotypes of the yda mutant, on plants overexpressing the pathogen effector HOPAI1 (which inactivates MPK3 and MPK6, Ref. 24), or the scrm-D gain-of-function mutant25 (Fig. 2i–k, and Supplementary Fig. 8). The BR biosynthetic inhibitor brassinazole also significantly enhanced the stomatal phenotypes of tmm, but did not further increase stomata in er;erl1;erl2, likely because the er;erl1;erl2 surfaces are already nearly confluent with stomata (Supplementary Fig. 9). These results strongly indicate that GSK3-like kinases act downstream of the ER and TMM receptors, but upstream of the YDA MAPKKK.

Figure. 2
Arabidopsis GSK3s act downstream of ERf and TMM but upstream of YDA in the stomatal development signaling pathway

YDA contains 84 putative GSK3 phosphorylation sites (Ser/Thr-x-x-x-Ser/Thr). Many of these sites are conserved in YDA's two rice homologs, Os02g0666300 and Os04g0559800, and these homologues also share a highly conserved sequence just N-terminal of the kinase domain. Importantly, YDA can be made constitutively active when part of this region (AA 185–322, Fig. 3a) is deleted23. The region deleted in CA-YDA contains 23 putative GSK3 phosphorylation sites including successive phosphorylation sites as found in the known BIN2 target BZR1 (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 10).

Figure. 3
BIN2 inhibits YDA kinase activity through phosphorylation

We tested whether BIN2 directly interacts with and phosphorylates YDA. MBP-YDA was detected in an overlay assay by using GST-BIN2 and anti-GST antibody (Fig. 3b), demonstrating direct YDA binding to BIN2 in vitro. BIN2 also interacted with YDA and CA-YDA in yeast two-hybrid assays (Fig. 3c). In vitro kinase assays demonstrated that BIN2 phosphorylated YDA, but YDA did not phosphorylate a kinase-inactive BIN2 mutant or other BR signaling components (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 11). BIN2 strongly phosphorylated the region deleted in CA-YDA (Fig. 3e), suggesting that BIN2 might inhibit YDA by phosphorylating its auto-regulatory domain.

BIN2 phosphorylation of BZR1 causes mobility shifts of the phosphorylated BZR1 band in SDS-PAGE gels14. Like BZR1, YDA phosphorylated by BIN2 in vitro also exhibited slower mobility (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 11). Consistent with the in vitro data, bikinin treatment of Arabidopsis seedlings increased the mobility of YDA-myc in SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3f). When transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaf cells, both YDA-myc and CA-YDA-myc were co-immunoprecipitated by anti-GFP antibody when co-expressed with BIN2-YFP but not when expressed alone (Fig. 3g), demonstrating interaction between BIN2 and YDA in vivo. Furthermore, co-expression of BIN2 retarded mobility of YDA, but not of CA-YDA bands in immunoblots (Fig. 3g). These results confirm that BIN2 mainly phosphorylates the YDA N-terminal regulatory domain.

Finally, we tested whether BIN2 phosphorylation of YDA affects YDA kinase activity and whether BR and bikinin affect MAPK activity in plants. YDA was pre-incubated with BIN2 and ATP, or a kinase-inactive mutant BIN2 (mBIN2) as control, and then purified and further incubated with MKK4 (its known substrate), bikinin, and 32P-γ-ATP. Pre-incubation with BIN2, but not with mBIN2, decreased YDA phosphorylation of MKK4 (Fig. 3h, Supplementary Fig. 12), indicating that BIN2 phosphorylation inhibits YDA activity. Consistent with BIN2 inactivation of YDA, the kinase activities of MPK3 and MPK6 were reduced in the det2 mutant but increased by treatment with bikinin or brassinolide (Fig. 3i and 3j).

Taken together, our genetic and biochemical analyses demonstrate that BR negatively regulates stomatal development by inhibiting the BIN2-mediated phosphorylation and inactivation of YDA (Fig. 3k). When BR levels are low, active BIN2 directly phosphorylates and inactivates YDA; reduced MAP kinase pathway activity can derepress SPCH, allowing SPCH to initiate stomatal development. BR signaling through BRI1, BSK1, and BSU1 inactivates the GSK3s, resulting in activation of the MAP kinase pathway and inhibition of stomatal production (Fig. 3k).

This study supports a role of BR as a master regulator that coordinates both physiological and developmental aspects of plant growth. Previous studies have demonstrated key functions of BR in inhibiting photomorphogenesis and photosynthetic gene expression6,26,27. Here we add a role for BR in stomatal production, which must be coordinated with other developmental processes to optimize photosynthetic and water-use efficiency. Interestingly, BR represses light-responsive gene expression and chloroplast development mainly through the BZR1-mediated transcriptional network26,27, but represses stomatal development through a BZR1-independent GSK3-MAPK crosstalk mechanism. Both GSK3 and MAPK are highly conserved in all eukaryotes, but it remains to be seen whether GSK3s directly inactivate MAPKKKs in animals. This GSK3-MAPK connection has the potential to act in multiple receptor kinase-mediated signaling pathways, mediating crosstalk between these pathways in plants. The stronger stomata-clustering phenotype of bsu-q and suppression of er;erl1;erl2 stomata phenotypes by bikinin raise a possibility that members of the BSU1 and GSK3 families mediate signaling by the ERf receptor kinases. The signals from BRI1 and ERf must be partitioned differently downstream, however, such that BRI1 controls GSK3 regulation of both BZR1 and YDA but ERf mainly controls the GSK3 inactivation of YDA (Fig. 3k), because er;erl1;erl2 had no obvious effect on BR-regulated BZR1 phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. 13). Similar mechanisms and components might also be used by additional signaling pathways, such as the innate immunity pathway downstream of the FLS2 receptor kinase, which shares with BRI1 the BAK1 co-receptor28 and downstream components MPK3/6 (Ref. 24). In support of such an idea, overexpression of a GSK3-like kinase reduced the pathogen-induced activation of MPK3 and MPK6 (Ref. 29). How signaling specificity is maintained when multiple pathways share the same components is an outstanding question for future study, and the studies of the BR model system will likely shed light on the hundreds of plant receptor kinases and their crosstalk during plant responses to complex endogenous and environmental cues.

METHODS SUMMARY

Stomatal quantification

Cotyledons of 8-day-old seedlings were cleared in ethanol:acetic acid and mounted on slides in Hoyer's solution (as in Ref. 23). Two to four images at 400× magnification (180 μm2) were captured per cotyledon from central regions of abaxial leaves. Guard cells, meristemoids, GMCs, and pavement cells were counted. Statistical analysis was performed by Sigmaplot software (Systat Software Inc. San Jose, CA). For treatment with bikinin21 (4-[(5-bromopyridin-2-yl)amino]-4-oxobutanoic acid, ChemBridge Corporation, San Diego, CA), seedlings were grown on 1/2 MS medium containing DMSO or 30 μM bikinin (+10 μM estradiol for HOPAI1 inducible lines) for 8 days before stomata were analyzed.

Biochemical assays

To test the bikinin effect on YDA-myc phosphorylation, homozygous YDA-4myc plants were grown on 1/2 MS medium containing 2 μM BRZ for 5 days and treated with 30 μM bikinin or 2 μM BRZ solution for 30 min with gentle agitation. Yeast two-hybrid, in vitro interaction and kinase assays11,14, and in-gel kinase assays30 were as described previously. Details of methods are available as Supplementary Information available online.

METHODS

Materials and growth conditions

All mutants are in the Columbia ecotype except yda Y295 (C24 ecotype)23, CA-YDA (Ler ecotype)23, and bin2-3;bil1;bil2 triple mutant obtained from Dr. Jianming Li (Ws ecotype)31. The erecta triple er105;erl1-2;erl2-1 (Ref. 32) and scrm-D (Ref 25) were obtained from Dr. Keiko Torii. Dr. Jian-Min Zhou kindly provided seeds of estradiol-inducible HOPAI1 transgenic plants24. For all analyses, Arabidopsis seedlings were grown on MS agar medium for 8 days under continuous light in Percival growth chamber at 22 °C.

Plasmids

For cloning MBP-185/322, a partial cDNA was amplified from YDA cDNA clone using primers (forward; 5'-caccAGTAACAAAAACTCAGCTGAGATGTTT-3', reverse; 5'-AGAGCTAG GACCAGGGCTTGTCATTCT-3'), cloned into pENTR-SD-DTOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and then subcloned into the gateway compatible pMALc2 vector (New England Biolab, Beverly, MA). For expression in plants, cDNA entry clones of YDA and CA-YDA were subcloned into a Gateway compatible 35S::4myc-6His vector constructed in the pCAMBIA 1390 vector. BSL2 cDNA in the pENTR vector was subcloned into Gateway compatible pEarley-101 vector33 to generate 35S::BSL2-YFP.

Overlay assay

To test interaction of YDA and BIN2 in vitro, a gel blot separating MBP, MBP-CDG1 (a protein kinase used as a negative control), and MBP-YDA was incubated with 20 μg GST-BIN2 in 5% non-fat dry milk/PBS buffer and washed four times. The blot was then probed with HRP-conjugated anti-GST antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).

In vitro kinase assay

Induction and purification of proteins expressed from E.coli was performed as described previously14. For Figure 3d and 3e, 1 μg of GST-BIN2 or 0.5 μg of MBP-BIN2 was incubated with 1 μg of MBP-YDA or MBP-185/322 in the kinase buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl and 1 mM DTT) containing 100 μM ATP and 10 μCi 32P-γ-ATP at 30°C for 3 hrs. To examine whether BIN2 inhibits YDA activity, equal amounts of MBP-YDA were pre-incubated with GST-BIN2 or GST-mBIN2 (M115A) for 2 hrs. Pre-incubated MBP-YDA was subsequently purified using glutathione beads and amylose beads to remove GST-BIN2 or GST-mBIN2. Purified YDA was further incubated with GST-mMKK4 (K108R), 10 μCi 32P-γ-ATP, and 10 μM bikinin (to inhibit any residual BIN2) at 30°C for 3 hrs. YDA kinase activity toward mMKK4 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography.

In-gel kinase assay

The in-gel kinase assay was performed as described previously30, with the following modifications. Total proteins were extracted with buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% Glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μM E-64, 1μM bestatin, 1 μM pepstatin and 2 μM leupeptin. Supernatant obtained from 12,000 rpm centrifugation was quantified by Bradford protein assay. Equal amount of protein (40 μg) was loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE gel embedded with 0.2 mg/mL of myelin basic protein. After electrophoresis, SDS was removed by incubation with washing buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM DTT, 5 mM NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 0.5 mg/mL BSA, and 0.1% Triton X-100) with three buffer exchanges at RT 1.5 hr. The gel was incubated with renaturation buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM DTT, 5 mM NaF, and 0.1 mM Na3VO4) at 4°C overnight with four buffer exchanges. After pre-incubation with 100 mL of kinase reaction buffer without ATP for 30 min, the gel was incubated with 30 mL of kinase reaction buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 2 mM EGTA, 12 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 200 nM ATP, and 50 μCi 32P-γ-ATP) for 1.5 hr. The gel was washed with solution containing 5% trichloroacetic acid (w/v) and 1% potassium pyrophosphate (w/v) four times for 2–3 hrs. Dried gel was exposed with phosphor screen followed by phosphoimager analysis.

Transient interaction assays and creation of transgenic plants

Agrobacterium GV3101 strains transformed with 35S::CA-YDA-4myc-6His or 35S::YDA-4myc-6His constructs were co-infiltrated with or without 35S-BIN2-YFP expressing Agrobacterium into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves as described previously11. After 36 hrs, protein extracts were prepared from N. benthamiana leaves in IP buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% Glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μM E-64, 1μM bestatin, 1 μM pepstatin and 2 μM leupeptin. Supernatant obtained from 20,000g centrifugation was incubated with anti-GFP antibody bound protein A beads for 1 hr. Beads were washed 5 times with IP buffer containing 0.2% Triton X-100. Immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted with 2× SDS Laemmli buffer, separated on SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting using anti-myc antibody (abcam, Cambridge, MA) and anti-GFP antibody.

For transgenic Arabidopsis plants, wild-type Arabidopsis was transformed with Agrobacterium containing 35S::YDA-4myc-6His or 35S::BSL2-YFP construct by floral dip. Hygromycin or Basta-resistant T1 plants were screened by immunoblot using anti-myc or anti-GFP antibody, respectively.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Keiko Torii for providing seeds of the erecta triple mutant and scrm-D mutant; Dr. Jian-Min Zhou for providing the HOPAI1 transgenic line; Dr. Jianming Li for providing the bin2-3;bil1;bil2 triple mutant. Research was primarily supported by a grant from NIH (R01GM066258), and partially by U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FG02-08ER15973) and the Herman Frasch Foundation. D.C.B is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.

Author Contributions T.W.K. performed all experiments. T.W.K, and Z.W designed the experiments, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. M.M cloned cDNAs of BSL2 and BSL3, and BSL2pro-BSL2. D.C.B. contributed materials and wrote the manuscript.

Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprint. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

1. Bergmann DC, Sack FD. Stomatal development. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:163–181. [PubMed]
2. Dong J, Bergmann DC. Stomatal patterning and development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2010;91:267–297. [PubMed]
3. Kim TW, Wang ZY. Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction from Receptor Kinases to Transcription Factors. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:681–704. [PubMed]
4. Thummel CS, Chory J. Steroid signaling in plants and insects--common themes, different pathways. Genes Dev. 2002;16:3113–3129. [PubMed]
5. Szekeres M, et al. Brassinosteroids rescue the deficiency of CYP90, a cytochrome P450, controlling cell elongation and de-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell. 1996;85:171–182. [PubMed]
6. Li J, Nagpal P, Vitart V, McMorris TC, Chory J. A role for brassinosteroids in light-dependent development of Arabidopsis. Science. 1996;272:398–401. [PubMed]
7. Kinoshita T, et al. Binding of brassinosteroids to the extracellular domain of plant receptor kinase BRI1. Nature. 2005;433:167–171. [PubMed]
8. Hothorn M, et al. Structural basis of steroid hormone perception by the receptor kinase BRI1. Nature. 2011;474:467–471. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. She J, et al. Structural insight into brassinosteroid perception by BRI1. Nature. 2011;474:472–476. [PubMed]
10. Tang W, et al. BSKs mediate signal transduction from the receptor kinase BRI1 in Arabidopsis. Science. 2008;321:557–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Kim T-W, et al. Brassinosteroid signal transduction from cell-surface receptor kinases to nuclear transcription factors. Nat Cell Bio. 2009;11:1254–1260. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Tang W, et al. PP2A activates brassinosteroid-responsive gene expression and plant growth by dephosphorylating BZR1. Nat Cell Bio. 2011;13:124–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Li J, Nam KH. Regulation of brassinosteroid signaling by a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase. Science. 2002;295:1299–1301. [PubMed]
14. He JX, Gendron JM, Yang Y, Li J, Wang ZY. The GSK3-like kinase BIN2 phosphorylates and destabilizes BZR1, a positive regulator of the brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10185–10190. [PubMed]
15. Saibo NJ, Vriezen WH, Beemster GT, Van Der Straeten D. Growth and stomata development of Arabidopsis hypocotyls are controlled by gibberellins and modulated by ethylene and auxins. Plant J. 2003;33:989–1000. [PubMed]
16. Kang CY, Lian HL, Wang FF, Huang JR, Yang HQ. Cryptochromes, phytochromes, and COP1 regulate light-controlled stomatal development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21:2624–2641. [PubMed]
17. Wang H, Ngwenyama N, Liu Y, Walker JC, Zhang S. Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:63–73. [PubMed]
18. Lampard GR, Macalister CA, Bergmann DC. Arabidopsis stomatal initiation is controlled by MAPK-mediated regulation of the bHLH SPEECHLESS. Science. 2008;322:1113–1116. [PubMed]
19. Rowe MH, Bergmann DC. Complex signals for simple cells: the expanding ranks of signals and receptors guiding stomatal development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13:548–555. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Wang ZY, et al. Nuclear-localized BZR1 mediates brassinosteroid-induced growth and feedback suppression of brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Dev Cell. 2002;2:505–513. [PubMed]
21. De Rybel B, et al. Chemical inhibition of a subset of Arabidopsis thaliana GSK3-like kinases activates brassinosteroid signaling. Chem Biol. 2009;16:594–604. [PubMed]
22. Rozhon W, Mayerhofer J, Petutschnig E, Fujioka S, Jonak C. ASKtheta, a group-III Arabidopsis GSK3, functions in the brassinosteroid signalling pathway. Plant J. 2010;62:215–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Bergmann DC, Lukowitz W, Somerville CR. Stomatal development and pattern controlled by a MAPKK kinase. Science. 2004;304:1494–1497. [PubMed]
24. Zhang J, et al. A Pseudomonas syringae effector inactivates MAPKs to suppress PAMP-induced immunity in plants. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;1:175–185. [PubMed]
25. Kanaoka MM, et al. SCREAM/ICE1 and SCREAM2 specify three cell-state transitional steps leading to arabidopsis stomatal differentiation. Plant Cell. 2008;20:1775–1785. [PubMed]
26. Sun Y, et al. Integration of Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction with the Transcription Network for Plant Growth Regulation in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2010;19:765–777. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Luo X-M, et al. Integration of light and brassinosteroid signaling pathways by a GATA transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2010;19:872–883. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Chinchilla D, et al. A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence. Nature. 2007;448:497–500. [PubMed]
29. Wrzaczek M, Rozhon W, Jonak C. A Proteasome-regulated glycogen synthase kinase-3 modulates disease response in plants. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5249–5255. [PubMed]
30. Zhang S, Klessig DF. Salicylic acid activates a 48-kD MAP kinase in tobacco. Plant Cell. 1997;9:809–824. [PubMed]
31. Yan Z, Zhao J, Peng P, Chihara RK, Li J. BIN2 Functions Redundantly with Other Arabidopsis GSK3-Like Kinases to Regulate Brassinosteroid Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:710–721. [PubMed]
32. Shpak ED, McAbee JM, Pillitteri LJ, Torii KU. Stomatal patterning and differentiation by synergistic interactions of receptor kinases. Science. 2005;309:290–293. [PubMed]
33. Earley KW, et al. Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. Plant J. 2006;45:616–629. [PubMed]