PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Int J Cancer. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 November 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3291738
NIHMSID: NIHMS323021

Cancer risks for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers with a family history of colorectal cancer

Abstract

Cancer risks for a person who has inherited a MUTYH mutation from only one parent (monoallelic mutation carrier) are uncertain. Using the Colon Cancer Family Registry and Newfoundland Familial Colon Cancer Registry, we identified 2,179 first-and second-degree relatives of 144 incident colorectal cancer (CRC) cases who were monoallelic or biallelic mutation carriers ascertained by sampling population complete cancer registries in the United States, Canada and Australia. Using Cox regression weighted to adjust for sampling on family history, we estimated that the country-, age- and sex-specific standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for monoallelic mutation carriers, compared to the general population, were: 2.04 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.56–2.70; p < 0.001) for CRC, 3.24 (95%CI 2.18–4.98; p < 0.001) for gastric cancer, 3.09 (95%CI 1.07–12.25; p = 0.07) for liver cancer and 2.33 (95%CI 1.18–5.08; p = 0.02) for endometrial cancer. Age-specific cumulative risks to age 70 years, estimated using the SIRs and US population incidences, were: for CRC, 6% (95%CI 5–8%) for men and 4% (95%CI 3–6%) for women; for gastric cancer, 2% (95%CI 1–3%) for men and 0.7% (95%CI 0.5–1%) for women; for liver cancer, 1% (95%CI 0.3–3%) for men and 0.3% (95%CI 0.1–1%) for women and for endometrial cancer, 4% (95%CI 2–8%). There was no evidence of increased risks for cancers of the brain, pancreas, kidney, lung, breast or prostate. Monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers with a family history of CRC, such as those identified from screening multiple-case CRC families, are at increased risk of colorectal, gastric, endometrial and possibly liver cancers.

Keywords: monoallelic MUTYH mutations, colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer

The MutY human homolog gene, hereafter called MUTYH, is a base excision repair (BER) gene that plays a major role in detecting and protecting against oxidative DNA damage. It encodes a glycosylase that removes adenines mispaired opposite 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxoG), one of the most stable products of oxidative DNA damage.1,2 If this function is lost in a cell due to MUTYH mutation of both alleles, there are increased G:C→T:A transversions (a guanine-cytosine pair to a thymine-adenine pair)2 in other genes including tumor suppressors, which could increase cancer risk.3 Persons carrying germline mutations in both alleles of MUTYH (biallelic mutation), whether they are homozygous (mutations on each allele are identical) or compound heterozygous (mutations on each allele are different), have a substantially increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC),46 with a cumulative risk of 80% at age 70 years.4 Germline mutations in a single allele of MUTYH (monoallelic mutation) are associated with a small increase of 1.15-fold in CRC risk compared to noncarriers,7 and a twofold increased risk for carriers who have a family history of CRC.8

The risk of cancers other than CRC for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers is less well understood. Several small studies and case-reports have reported extracolonic tumors in either monoallelic or biallelic carriers of MUTYH mutations including gastroduodenal polyps and cancer,914 gastric polyp and cancer,11,14,15 sebaceous adenomas and sebaceous carcinomas1519 and brain tumors, especially meningioma.20 While some studies reported that MUTYH mutations could be associated with increased risk of breast cancer10,15,21 and endometrial cancer19,22; others found no association between MUTYH mutations and these malignancies.23,24 Vogt et al.15 has recently shown that biallelic MUTYH mutation carriers who have MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) are at increased risk of duodenal cancer (standardized incidence ratio, SIR 129; 95% confidence interval, CI 15.7–465.9), ovarian cancer (SIR 5.7; 95%CI 1.2–16.7), bladder cancer (SIR 7.2; 95%CI 2.0–18.4) and skin cancers (SIR 2.8; 95%CI 1.5–4.8) compared to the general population. To our knowledge, the risks of extracolonic cancers for monoallelic mutation carriers have not been established. In this study, we estimated the risks of colorectal and extracolonic cancers for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers who are relatives of CRC cases.

Material and Methods

Subjects

Subjects were the first- and second-degree relatives of incident CRC cases (probands) recruited from population complete cancer registries by the Colon Cancer Family Registry (Colon CFR) and the Newfoundland Familial Colon Cancer Registry. All probands were excluded from the analysis. Study designs and recruitments for the Colon CFR can be found at http://epi.grants.cancer.gov/CFR/ and have been published previously in detail.25,26 Briefly, the Colon CFR recruited probands who were diagnosed with CRC between 1997 and 2007 from population complete cancer registries in the United States (Puget Sound, Washington State; the State of Minnesota; Los Angeles, California; Arizona; Colorado; New Hampshire; North Carolina and Hawaii), Australia (Victoria) and Canada (Ontario). The Newfoundland Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry recruited probands who were diagnosed with CRC between 1999 and 2003 in the Canadian provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador as described in detail by Green et al.27 Attempts were made to recruit the first-degree relatives of probands, and some centers also attempted to recruit second-degree relatives. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study protocols were approved by local institutional research ethics review boards.

Data collection

From 1997 to 2002, baseline information on demographics, personal characteristics, personal and family history of cancer, cancer screening and surgery were obtained from probands and all participating relatives at time of recruitment. From 2002 to 2007, participants were followed-up approximately 5 years after baseline to update demographics, personal characteristics and personal and family history of cancer, cancer screening and surgery. The questionnaires are available at the following URL: https://cfrisc.georgetown.edu/isc/dd.questionnaires.do. The present study was based on all available baseline and follow-up data. Reported cancer diagnoses and age at diagnosis were confirmed, where possible using pathology reports, medical records, cancer registry reports and/or death certificates. The location, histology and behavior of cancer diagnoses were coded and stored using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, third edition (ICD-O-3).28 Blood samples and permission to access tumor tissue was requested from participants.

MUTYH mutation testing

All participants who provided a DNA sample were tested for mutations in the MUTYH gene. As described in detail by Cleary et al.,5 genomic DNA extracted from each participant was sent to a central testing facility (Analytic Genetics Technology Centre, Toronto, Canada). DNA was screened for 12 previously identified variants of MUTYH mutations: Y179C, G396D, Y104X, R274Q, E480X, Q391X, c.1147delC, c.933+ 3A>C, c.1437_1439delGGA, R241W, c.1228_1229insGG, c.1187-2A→G using the MassArray MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (MS) system (Sequenom, San Diego, CA). Screening for R241W, c.1228_1229insGG and c.1187-2A→G was discontinued when testing of 6,000 samples failed to identify any carriers of these three variants. All samples with MS mobility shifts underwent screening of the entire MUTYH coding region, promoter and splice sites regions by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (Transgenomic Wave 3500HT System; Transgenomic, Omaha, NE), to confirm the mutation and to identify additional mutations. All MS-detected variants and WAVE mobility shifts were submitted for sequencing for mutation confirmation (ABI PRISM 3130XL Genetic Analyser). The names of MUTYH variants were provided in our article using the nomenclature according to the Leiden Open Variation Database version 2.29

Statistical analysis

For participants who did not provide a DNA sample for MUTYH mutation testing, the probabilities of being a mono-allelic mutation carrier and a biallelic mutation carrier were estimated based on their genetic relationship to the probands and to any other genotyped relatives and the assumptions of Mendelian inheritance with a population allele frequency of 0.0085 for all mutations in MUTYH combined.7 The total number of carriers was estimated by summing the number of known carriers and the carrier probabilities of the ungenotyped relatives. These calculations were performed using R 2.7.230 and a modified version of Mendel 3.2.31

SIRs for monoallelic mutation carriers were estimated for the following cancers: colorectal (ICD-O-3 C18-20), gastric (ICD-O-3 C16), liver (ICD-O-3 C22), pancreatic (ICD-O-3 C25), brain (ICD-O-3 C71), kidney (ICD-O-3 C64-65) and lung (ICD-O-3 C34) cancer for both sexes; endometrial (ICD-O-3 C54-55) and breast (ICD-O-3 C50) cancer for women and prostate cancer (ICD-O-3 C61) for men.

SIRs for different cancers were calculated by dividing the observed numbers of cancers by the expected numbers for estimated total monoallelic mutation carriers. The observed numbers of cancers were calculated by multiplying the numbers of observed cancers for subjects by their probabilities of being a monoallelic carrier. The expected numbers of cancers were calculated by multiplying the age-, sex- and country-specific incidence for the general population by the corresponding observation time (person-years) in the study cohort. Age- and sex-specific cancer incidences in 1988–1992 for each country (Australia, Canada and the United States) were obtained from Cancer Incidence in Five Continents.32 The period of 1988–1992 was selected for analysis because it was the closest available dataset to the mean calendar year of cancer diagnoses in the sample.

Observation time for each subject started at birth and ended at the age at first diagnosis of cancer or last known age or age of death, whichever occurred first. For CRC, we censored each subject at the age of polypectomy (except when it occurred within a year of the diagnosis of CRC) and, for endometrial cancer, we censored each woman at the age of hysterectomy (except when it occurred within a year of the diagnosis of endometrial cancer). Where age at diagnosis of cancer was not reported (20% of all cancer cases), we assumed the age of diagnosis to be 1 year prior to the last known age or, if last known age was not available, the median age at diagnosis of specific cancer for the general population obtained from SEER Cancer Statistics Review (1975–2000).33

To account for stratified sampling based on family history, we gave each subject a weight equal to the reciprocal of the family sampling fractions used by each study center. Given all subjects in this study were the first- or second-degree relatives of a proband who was diagnosed with CRC from population complete cancer registries, our risk estimates would be applicable to “monoallelic mutation carriers with a family history of CRC” from the general population.

In our study, we excluded subjects from the analyses who had an estimated probability of being a biallelic mutation carrier of 1% or more to avoid the effect of biallelic mutation on the estimation of cancer risks for monoallelic mutation carriers. As a sensitivity analysis, we compared these SIRs with that for subjects who did not have any biallelic mutation carrier probability i.e., zero probability of being a biallelic mutation carrier. Robust estimates of variance were calculated using the cluster subcommand, applied to an identifier variable unique to each family. All reported statistical tests were two-sided and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All these statistical analyses were done using Stata 10.0.34

Estimated cumulative risks (penetrance) of cancers to age 70 years and their 95%CIs for monoallelic mutation carriers for each sex were calculated by summing over sex-specific incidences incidencei at age i multiplied by the estimated SIR, based on the population incidences of the United States, using the formula:

equation M1

Results

In total 2,396 subjects (first- and second-degree relatives of probands) were identified from 152 families carrying monoallelic or biallelic MUTYH mutations. Of these, we excluded 62 subjects with ≥1% probability of being a biallelic mutation carrier and 155 subjects from eight families because these families were known to segregate a mutation in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene. The remaining 2,179 subjects from 144 families were included in the analyses. Definitive mutation status was known for 131 subjects (80 monoallelic mutation carriers and 51 noncarriers). We estimated there were 772 monoallelic mutation carriers among untested subjects, giving a total estimated number of 852 in our sample. Of these, 404 from 67 families were recruited from Canada, 275 from 56 families from the United States and 173 from 21 families from Australia (Table 1). We estimated there were five biallelic mutation carriers among ungenotyped relatives. Of all reported cancers, 30% were confirmed by pathology report, hospital record, death certificate or cancer registry.

Table 1
Number of families, relatives and monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers in the study

Table 2 shows that among monoallelic mutation carriers with less than 1% probability of being a biallelic mutation carrier, there were: 10 CRCs (SIRs 2.04; 95%CI 1.56–2.70; p < 0.001), three gastric cancers (SIR 3.24; 95%CI 2.18–4.98; p < 0.001), one liver cancer (SIR 3.09; 95%CI 1.07–12.25; p = 0.07) and three endometrial cancers (SIR 2.33; 95%CI 1.18–5.08; p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant evidence of increased risks for cancers of the brain, pancreas, kidney, lung, breast or prostate.

Table 2
Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for carriers of monoallelic MUTYH mutations compared to the general population for cancers by sex

When we restricted to the subjects with zero probability of being a biallelic mutation carrier, the estimated total number of monoallelic mutation carriers was 142. The SIRs were: 2.31 (95%CI 1.33–4.22) for CRC, 3.54 (95%CI 1.35–12.18) for gastric cancer and 1.64 (95%CI 0.27–25.46) for endometrial cancer.

Table 3 shows the estimated cumulative risks (penetrance) of different cancers for monoallelic mutation carriers. The estimated cumulative risks to age 70 years were: for CRC, 6% (95%CI 5–8%) for men and 4% (95%CI 3–6%) for women; for gastric cancer, 2% (95%CI 1–3%) for men and 0.7% (95%CI 0.5–1%) for women; for liver cancer, 1% (95%CI 0.3–3%) for men and 0.3% (95%CI 0.1–1%) for women and for endometrial cancer, 4% (95%CI 2–8%).

Table 3
Cumulative risks of colorectal, gastric, liver and endometrial cancer to age 70 years for carriers of monoallelic MUTYH mutations

Discussion

We have assembled the largest series of monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers to date and estimated cancer risks using information from the family data, based on the laws of Mendelian inheritance, known mutation carrier status and the family pedigrees. We have shown that monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers with a family history of CRC have increased risks of colorectal, gastric, endometrial and possibly liver cancers. These observed risks were unlikely to be due to biallelic mutations because we estimated that there were only five biallelic mutation carriers in the whole sample. In the analysis of subjects who had zero probability of being a biallelic mutation carrier, the SIRs did not change much from that from analysis of subjects who had less than 1% probability of being a biallelic mutation carrier.

We observed that monoallelic mutation carriers with a family history of CRC had a twofold increased risk of CRC compared to the general population. A kin-cohort study4 of the relatives of MUTYH mutation carriers reported that monoallelic mutation carriers who had a family history of CRC were at increased risk of CRC with a hazard ratio of 2.9 (95%CI 1.2–7.0; p = 0.02). A retrospective cohort analysis8 of obligate carriers of monoallelic mutations, being the parents of biallelic carriers, also estimated monoallelic mutation carriers had twice the CRC risk of general population (SIR 2.12; 95%CI 1.30–3.28; p < 0.01). Therefore, our estimates are consistent with those from the other studies.

The increased CRC risk for monoallelic mutation carriers in the MUTYH gene is consistent with dominant or co-dominant effects of mutations in other DNA repair genes. The mechanism of this risk is not clear but may occur through reduced efficiency of the BER system, alterations of protein–protein interactions or through loss of the wild-type allele in a classic tumor suppressor model (Knudson PNAS 1971). This latter hypothesis is supported by the observed loss of heterozygosity of the 1p region in CRC3537 and other cancers.3841 In addition to the colon, the MUTYH gene is expressed in several tissues including brain, stomach, pancreas, lung, kidney, prostate and endometrium (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/av.cgi?c=geneid&org=9606&l=4595). Given these observations, combined with the fact that oxidative damage and the generation of 8-oxoG occurs in a multitude of tissues,42 one would expect that inherited mutations in the MUTYH gene may predispose carriers to the development of other malignancies in addition to the recognized increased risk in CRC.

Several studies have reported upper gastrointestinal tumors including duodenal polyps,911,13,15 duodenal cancer,12,13,15 gastric polyps11,15 and gastric cancer14,15 among carriers of monoallelic or biallelic MUTYH mutations. In our study, we found a threefold increased risk of gastric cancers for monoallelic mutation carriers with a family history of CRC compared to the general population. Vogt et al.15 estimated the risk of gastric cancer for biallelic mutation carriers to be SIR of 4.2 (95%CI 0.9–12.3). These two estimates are not inconsistent with each other (p = 0.7). Vogt et al.15 also reported an increased risk of duodenal cancer for biallelic mutation carriers with MAP. In this study, we found only one small intestinal cancer (ICD-O-3 C17.9) diagnosed at age 52 years in a female subject who had a probability of 0.5 of being a monoallelic mutation carrier. Data on benign gastro-duodenal tumors were not collected by the Colon CFR.

Two clinical studies19,22 reported patients with a diagnosis of endometrial cancer and biallelic MUTYH mutations, and suggested biallelic germline mutations may increase susceptibility to endometrial cancer. Vogt et al.15 did not find statistical evidence of an increased incidence of endometrial cancers for biallelic mutation carriers with MAP (SIR 4.6; 95%CI 0.6–16.5). In our study, we found a twofold increased incidence of endometrial cancer for monoallelic mutation carriers with a family history of CRC. These two estimates are not inconsistent with each other (p = 0.5).

We observed a marginal evidence of an increased risk of liver cancer for monoallelic mutation carriers with a family history of CRC. We present this result with a great caution; only one liver cancer case was observed, the confidence interval is wide, and it is possible this was a secondary spread given the liver is a common site for metastasis from another primary cancer. We included only liver cancer cases without another reported cancer in this analysis but we acknowledge that there is still a chance of secondary deposit in liver.

In our study, we did not observe statistically significant evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer for female carriers compared to the general population (SIR 1.27; 95%CI 0.84–1.99; p = 0.28). This is consistent with the results of Beiner et al.24 who also did not observe an association between breast cancer and monoallelic mutation of either Y179C (OR 1.1; 95%CI 0.29–4.0; p = 0.9) or G396D (OR 1.2; 95%CI 0.44–3.3; p = 0.7). However, Wasielewski et al.21 concluded that the frequency of monoallelic mutation carriers was increased in families with excess breast and colorectal cancer cases.

Considering other extracolonic cancer risks for MUTYH mutation carriers, we did not observe statistically significant evidence of an increased risk for cancers of the brain, pancreas, kidney, prostate and lung for monoallelic mutation carriers with a family history of CRC. Consistent with our results, Shin et al.43 and Agalliu et al.44 found that MUTYH mutations were unlikely to contribute to prostate cancer risk, and Al-Tassan et al.45 and Vogt et al.15 found MUTYH mutations were unlikely to contribute to lung cancer risk.

Several studies1519 reported cutaneous tumors including various types of benign tumors (pilomatricomas, sebaceous adenomas, epitheliomas, lipoma) and malignant tumors (melanomas, squamous cell carcinomas, basal cell carcinomas, sebaceous carcinomas) among monoallelic and biallelic MUTYH mutation carriers. They also suggested this is similar to Muir-Torre syndrome in which sebaceous gland tumors are present in association with visceral malignancies. We do not have enough information to estimate the skin cancer risk for monoallelic mutation carriers in our study.

Our study showed increased risks of colorectal, gastric and endometrial cancers for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers with a family history of CRC. The magnitudes of these increased risks are far less than these occurring in Lynch Syndrome caused by germline mutations in MMR genes. However, the occurrence of Lynch Syndrome associated tumors in MUTYH mutation carriers is consistent with the possible existence of a common pathway between BER and MMR systems in the DNA repair. We note that MMR mutation carrying families were excluded from this study. Some studies46,47 also described physiological and functional cooperation between these two systems in reducing replicative error of DNA due to oxidative bases particularly for the MSH2 and MSH6 genes (MutSα homolog).

This study was based on, to our knowledge, the largest sample of monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers to date used to investigate the risks of colorectal and extracolonic cancers for monoallelic mutation carriers of MUTYH. The estimation of carrier probability was based on confirmed carriers tested not only for the two most common (in Caucasian populations) MUTYH mutations, namely Y179C and G396D but also for the nine most frequent known mutations. Using carrier probabilities helps to avoid survival bias because deceased cases unable to provide a blood sample for testing are still represented. Our application of weights to each subject depending on the different sampling strategies will minimize any selection bias due to sampling based on family history. We accounted for familial correlation in the risk of cancer using a robust variance correction to derive appropriate measure of estimate imprecision.

The study has some limitations. The presence of unverified cancers, unaccounted for time and geographic variation, and the use of carrier probabilities rather than actual tests for mutation status, might increase the imprecision of SIR estimates more than is given by the current confidence intervals, whose width reflects the small numbers of cancer cases.

We have shown that carriers of a monoallelic mutation in MUTYH, who are relatives of CRC cases also found to carry a MUTYH mutation, are at approximately twice the population risk cancer of CRC and endometrial cancer and three times the population risk of gastric and liver cancer. Commonly, MUTYH genetic testing is conducted only for the relatives of biallelic mutation carriers to try to identify other biallelic mutation carriers given their high risk of colorectal polyps and cancer. Our data support expanding MUTYH genetic testing to relatives of CRC cases found to have a monoallelic mutation in MUTYH so that unaffected monoallelic mutation carriers can be identified, as these carriers could benefit from surveillance to reduce their increased risk of some cancers.

Acknowledgments

Grant sponsor: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; Grant number: RFA #CA-95-011; Grant sponsor: Canadian Institute of Health Sciences (Interdisciplinary Research Team on Colorectal Cancer); Grant number: CIHR-CPT79845

The authors thank all study participants of the Colon Cancer Family Registry and Newfoundland Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry and all staff for their contributions to this project.

Abbreviations

BER
base excision repair
CI
confidence interval
Colon CFR
Colon Cancer Family Registry
CRC
colorectal cancer
MAP
MUTYH associated polyposis
MUTYH
the MutY human homologue
SIR
standardized incidence ratio

Footnotes

The content of this manuscript does neither necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or of the Colon Cancer Family Registry nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government or the Cancer Family Registry. Authors had full responsibility for the design of the study, the collection of the data, the analysis and interpretation of the data, the decision to submit the manuscript for publication and the writing of the manuscript.

References

1. Ames BN, Gold LS. Endogenous mutagens and the causes of aging and cancer. Mutat Res. 1991;250:3–16. [PubMed]
2. Cheadle JP, Dolwani S, Sampson JR. Inherited defects in the DNA glycosylase MYH cause multiple colorectal adenoma and carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24:1281–82. [PubMed]
3. Jiricny J, Marra G. DNA repair defects in colon cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003;13:61–69. [PubMed]
4. Jenkins MA, Croitoru ME, Monga N, Cleary SP, Cotterchio M, Hopper JL, Gallinger S. Risk of colorectal cancer in monoallelic and biallelic carriers of MYH mutations: A population-based case-family study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:312–14. [PubMed]
5. Cleary SP, Cotterchio M, Jenkins MA, Kim H, Bristow R, Green R, Haile R, Hopper JL, LeMarchand L, Lindor N, Parfrey P, Potter J, et al. Germline MutY human homologue mutations and colorectal cancer: A multisite case-control Study. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1251–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Lubbe SJ, Di Bernardo MC, Chandler IP, Houlston RS. Clinical implications of the colorectal cancer risk associated with MUTYH mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3975–80. [PubMed]
7. Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA. Association between monoallelic MUTYH mutations and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-regression analysis. Fam Cancer. in press. 0.1007/s10689-010-9399-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Jones N, Vogt S, Nielsen M, Christian D, Wark PA, Eccles D, Edwards E, Evans DG, Maher ER, Vasen HF, Hes FJ, Aretz S, et al. Increased colorectal cancer incidence in obligate carriers of heterozygous mutations in MUTYH. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:489–94. [PubMed]
9. Sieber OM, Lipton L, Crabtree M, Heinimann K, Fidalgo P, Phillips RKS, Bisgaard M-L, Orntoft TF, Aaltonen LA, Hodgson SV, Thomas HJW, Tomlinson IPM. Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:791–99. [PubMed]
10. Nielsen M, Franken PF, Reinards THCM, Weiss MM, Wagner A, van der Klift H, Kloosterman S, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Aalfs CM, Ausems MGEM, Brocker-Vriends AHJT, Gomez Garcia EB, et al. Multiplicity in polyp count and extracolonic manifestations in 40 Dutch patients with MYH associated polyposis coli (MAP) J Med Genet. 2005;42:e54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Kanter-Smoler G, Björk J, Fritzell K, Engwall Y, Hallberg B, Karlsson G, Grönberg H, Karlsson P, Wallgren A, Wahlström J, Hultcrantz R, Nordling M. Novel findings in Swedish patients with MYH-associated polyposis: Mutation detection and clinical characterization. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:499–506. [PubMed]
12. Nielsen M, Poley JW, Verhoef S, van Puijenbroek M, Weiss MM, Burger GT, Dommering CJ, Vasen HFA, Kuipers EJ, Wagner A, Morreau H, Hes FJ. Duodenal carcinoma in MUTYH-associated polyposis. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59:1212–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Buecher B, Baert-Desurmont S, Leborgne J, Humeau B, Olschwang S, Frébourg T. Duodenal adenocarcinoma and Mut Y human homologue-associated polyposis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20:1024–1027. [PubMed]
14. Zhang Y, Liu X, Fan Y, Ding J, Xu A, Zhou X, Hu X, Zhu M, Zhang X, Li S, Wu J, Cao H, et al. Germline mutations and polymorphic variants in MMR, E-cadherin and MYH genes associated with familial gastric cancer in Jiangsu of China. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2592–96. [PubMed]
15. Vogt S, Jones N, Christian D, Engel C, Nielsen M, Kaufmann A, Steinke V, Vasen HF, Propping P, Sampson JR, Hes FJ, Aretz S. Expanded extracolonic tumor spectrum in MUTYH-associated polyposis. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1976–85. e10. [PubMed]
16. Baglioni S, Melean G, Gensini F, Santucci M, Scatizzi M, Papi L, Genuardi M. A kindred with MYH-associated polyposis and pilomatricomas. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;134:212–14. [PubMed]
17. Ponti G, de Leon M, Maffei S, Pedroni M, Losi L, Di Gregorio C, Gismondi V, Scarselli A, Benatti P, Roncari B. Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis and Muir–Torre syndrome linked to compound biallelic constitutional MYH gene mutations. Clin Genet. 2005;68:442–47. [PubMed]
18. Ajith Kumar V, Gold J, Mallon E, Thomas S, Hodgson S. Sebaceous adenomas in an MYH associated polyposis patient of Indian (Gujarati) origin. Fam Cancer. 2008;7:187–89. [PubMed]
19. Barnetson RA, Devlin L, Miller J, Farrington SM, Slater S, Drake AC, Campbell H, Dunlop MG, Porteous ME. Germline mutation prevalence in the base excision repair gene, MYH, in patients with endometrial cancer. Clin Genet. 2007;72:551–55. [PubMed]
20. Rajaraman P, Hutchinson A, Wichner S, Black PM, Fine HA, Loeffler JS, Selker RG, Shapiro WR, Rothman N, Linet MS, Inskip PD. DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of adult meningioma, glioma, and acoustic neuroma. Neuro Oncol. 2010;12:37–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Wasielewski M, Out AA, Vermeulen J, Nielsen M, van den Ouweland A, Tops CM, Wijnen JT, Vasen HF, Weiss MM, Klijn JG, Devilee P, Hes FJ, et al. Increased MUTYH mutation frequency among Dutch families with breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. in press. [PubMed]
22. Tricarico R, Bet P, Ciambotti B, Di Gregorio C, Gatteschi B, Gismondi V, Toschi B, Tonelli F, Varesco L, Genuardi M. Endometrial cancer and somatic G>T KRAS transversion in patients with constitutional MUTYH biallelic mutations. Cancer Lett. 2009;274:266–70. [PubMed]
23. Ashton K, Proietto A, Otton G, Symonds I, Scott R. Genetic variants in MUTYH are not associated with endometrial cancer risk. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2009;7:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Beiner M, Zhang W, Zhang S, Gallinger S, Sun P, Narod S. Mutations of the MYH gene do not substantially contribute to the risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:575–78. [PubMed]
25. Newcomb PA, Baron J, Cotterchio M, Gallinger S, Grove J, Haile R, Hall D, Hopper JL, Jass J, Le Marchand L, Limburg P, Lindor N, et al. Colon Cancer Family Registry: An international resource for studies of the genetic epidemiology of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:2331–43. [PubMed]
26. Cotterchio M, Manno M, Klar N, McLaughlin J, Gallinger S. Colorectal screening is associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk: A case–control study within the population-based Ontario familial colorectal cancer registry. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:865–75. [PubMed]
27. Green R, Green J, Buehler S, Robb J, Daftary D, Gallinger S, McLaughlin J, Parfrey P, Younghusband H. Very high incidence of familial colorectal cancer in Newfoundland: A comparison with Ontario and 13 other population-based studies. Fam Cancer. 2007;6:53–62. [PubMed]
28. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International classification of diseases for oncology (ICD-O) 3. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
29. Out AA, Tops CM, Nielsen M, Weiss MM, van Minderhout IJ, Fokkema IF, Buisine MP, Claes K, Colas C, Fodde R, Fostira F, Franken PF, et al. Leiden open variation database of the MUTYH gene. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:1205–15. [PubMed]
30. R Development Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
31. Lange K, Weeks D, Boehnke M. Programs for pedigree analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE. Genet Epidemiol. 1988;5:471–72. [PubMed]
32. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Storm H. Cancer incidence in five continents. 1988–1992. VII. Lyon: IARC; 2005. CancerBase No.7.
33. Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, Hankey B, Miller B, Clegg L, Mariotto A, Fay M, Feuer E, Edwards B. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2003.
34. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2007.
35. Croitoru ME, Cleary SP, Di Nicola N, Manno M, Selander T, Aronson M, Redston M, Cotterchio M, Knight J, Gryfe R, Gallinger S. Association between biallelic and monoallelic germline MYH gene mutations and colorectal cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1631–34. [PubMed]
36. Kambara T, Whitehall VLJ, Spring KJ, Barker MA, Arnold S, Wynter CVA, Matsubara N, Tanaka N, Young JP, Leggett BA, Jass JR. Role of inherited defects of MYH in the development of sporadic colorectal cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004;40:1–9. [PubMed]
37. Thorstensen L, Qvist H, Heim S, Liefers G-J, Nesland JM, Giercksky K-E, Lothe RA. Evaluation of 1p losses in primary carcinomas, local recurrences and peripheral metastases from colorectal cancer patients. Neoplasia. 2000;2:514–522. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Gadji M, Fortin D, Tsanaclis A-M, Drouin R. Is the 1p/19q deletion a diagnostic marker of oligodendrogliomas? Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2009;194:12–22. [PubMed]
39. Leonard JH, Cook AL, Nancarrow D, Hayward N, Van Gele M, Van Roy N, Speleman F. Deletion mapping on the short arm of chromosome 1 in Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer Detect Prev. 2000;24:620–7. [PubMed]
40. Gorringe KL, Ramakrishna M, Williams LH, Sridhar A, Boyle SE, Bearfoot JL, Li J, Anglesio MS, Campbell IG. Are there any more ovarian tumor suppressor genes? A new perspective using ultra high-resolution copy number and loss of heterozygosity analysis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009;48:931–42. [PubMed]
41. Kleer CG, Bryant BR, Giordano TJ, Sobel M, Merino MJ. Genetic changes in chromosomes 1p and 17p in thyroid cancer progression. Endocr Pathol. 2000;11:137–43. [PubMed]
42. David SS, O’Shea VL, Kundu S. Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage. Nature. 2007;447:941–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Shin E-J, Chappell E, Pethe V, Hersey K, van der Kwast T, Fleshner N, Bapat B. MYH mutations are rare in prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007;133:373–78. [PubMed]
44. Agalliu I, Kwon E, Salinas C, Koopmeiners J, Ostrander E, Stanford J. Genetic variation in DNA repair genes and prostate cancer risk: Results from a population-based study. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21:289–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Al-Tassan N, Eisen T, Maynard J, Bridle H, Shah B, Fleischmann C, Sampson J, Cheadle J, Houlston R. Inherited variants in MYH are unlikely to contribute to the risk of lung carcinoma. Hum Genet. 2004;114:207–10. [PubMed]
46. Gu Y, Parker A, Wilson TM, Bai H, Chang D-Y, Lu AL. Human MutY homolog, a DNA glycosylase involved in base excision repair, physically and functionally interacts with mismatch repair proteins human MutS homolog 2/human MutS homolog 6. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:11135–42. [PubMed]
47. Russo MT, De Luca G, Degan P, Bignami M. Different DNA repair strategies to combat the threat from 8-oxoguanine. Mutat Res. 2007;614:69–76. [PubMed]