PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Card Fail. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3285442
NIHMSID: NIHMS329266

Comorbid Diabetes and End-of-Life Expenditures among Medicare Beneficiaries with Heart Failure

Saul Blecker, MD, MHS,1,2 Robert Herbert,3 and Frederick L. Brancati, MD, MHS1,2

Abstract

Background

Diabetes is associated with increased risk of mortality in heart failure. We examined the association of diabetes with expenditures, hospitalizations, and procedures among Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure during the last six months of life.

Methods and Results

In a 5% national Medicare sample, the prevalence of diabetes was 41.7% among 16,613 beneficiaries who died in 2007 with a diagnosis of heart failure. Diabetes was associated with higher expenditures during the last six months of life (mean $39,042 vs $29,003, p<0.001), even after adjusting for covariates, including age, gender, race, geographic location, comorbidities, and prior hospitalizations (cost ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.05–1.12). For both diabetic and non-diabetic adults, over half of Medicare expenditures were related to hospitalization costs (mean $22,516 vs $15,721, p<0.001). When compared to their counterparts without diabetes, beneficiaries with diabetes had higher rates of hospitalization (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 1.09, 95% CI 1.05–1.12) and days spent in the ICU.

Conclusions

Comorbid diabetes was common in heart failure and associated with higher expenditures, much of which was driven by increased rates of hospitalizations. Programs that focus on prevention of hospitalizations may reduce the substantial costs associated with heart failure near the end of life.

Introduction

Heart failure is associated with nearly $40 billion in direct costs and over one million hospitalizations annually in the United States. [1] Expenditures related to heart failure are particularly concentrated as individuals approach the end of life and have been increasing over time. [2, 3] During the last six months of life, heart failure is also associated with high rates of other markers of resource utilization, including hospitalizations, intensive care unit stays, and cardiovascular procedures.[3]

Diabetes mellitus is common among heart failure patients and its prevalence has been increasing over the past two decades. [4, 5] The high rate of diabetes has clinical importance as comorbid diabetes is associated with increased risk of hospitalization and mortality among heart failure patients. [6] Diabetes may also promote additional expenditures in heart failure, although this association has not been evaluated during the high utilization period near the end of life. [2, 7] The purpose of this study was to examine the association between diabetes and resource utilization among Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure during the last six months of life.

Methods

Study Design

We used a 5% national sample of Medicare claims to develop a cohort of individuals with heart failure. Datasets used were the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) file and the 5% denominator, outpatient, home health agency, hospice, and carrier files for the years 2005–2007.

We included Medicare beneficiaries who died in 2007 with a previous diagnosis of heart failure. Heart failure diagnosis was established with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code of 428 listed either as a hospital discharge diagnosis or in at least two physician claims in the year preceding the last six months of life (i.e. the period of 18 months to 6 months prior to the time of death). Inclusion criteria included age greater than or equal to 67 and at least two years of continuous enrollment in Medicare prior to time of death. We excluded beneficiaries who were enrolled in a health maintenance organization, did not have continuous Medicare Parts A and B coverage, or lived outside the United States.

Exposure

The primary exposure was a diagnosis of diabetes in the year prior to the last six months of life. Individuals were considered to have diabetes if an ICD-9-CM code of 250.xx was listed in either a hospital discharge diagnosis or at least two physician claims between 18 and 6 months prior to the date of death.

Outcomes

The main outcome was resource utilization during the last six months of life. Medicare expenditures were calculated by summing expenditures of the individual files (inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facilities, home health, hospice and carrier files). We evaluated hospitalizations as both a total count and by relevant categories: heart failure related (primary discharge diagnosis code 402.X1, 404.X1, 404.X3, 428.XX), non-heart failure cardiovascular related (primary discharge diagnosis code 390 to 459 other than those listed for heart failure), or non-cardiovascular related (all other discharge codes). Intensive care unit (ICU) utilization was assessed as both a binomial variable, based on any ICU stay, and a count variable, equal to the number of days spent in the ICU during the last six months of life. A beneficiary was considered to have received hospice care if Medicare had covered at least one day of hospice services during the last six months of life. Finally, we measured whether beneficiaries had received certain procedures, including echocardiogram, cardiac catheterization, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), dialysis, non-invasive ventilation, or mechanical ventilations. Procedures were identified using ICD-9-CM codes from inpatient files and current procedure manual (CPT) codes from carrier files.

Covariates

Age, gender, race, region, and end stage renal disease (ESRD) status were obtained from the Medicare denominator file; all other covariates were assessed using the claims files. Age was categorized into five groups: 67–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, and ≥90. Race was categorized as white, black, or other. Comorbidities were considered to be present if listed between 18 and 6 months prior to date of death on one inpatient or two outpatient claims. Comorbid conditions were defined by ICD-9-CM codes based on the Clinical Classification System (CCS) developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, kidney disease, cancer, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, coronary atherosclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, and depression. Prior hospitalizations were tabulated during the period of 18 to 6 months prior to date of death and categorized as no hospitalizations, 1–2 hospitalizations, and three or more hospitalizations.

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics were compared between individuals with and without diabetes using chi-squared tests for categorical variables. Because continuous variables did not meet the normality assumption, they were compared among groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Utilization outcomes were presented as means with standard deviations for continuous variables and percentages for binary variables. Hospitalizations were evaluated both as a binomial outcome and as count. To study the relationship between diabetes and total expenditures, we calculated a cost ratio using a negative binomial regression model, since cost data were overdispersed. The cost ratio provided an estimate of the relative increase in expenditures related to presence of diabetes. [8] We also used a negative binomial regression model to estimate the incidence rate ratio for number of hospitalizations, number of hospitalization days, and number of ICU days for individuals with versus without diabetes. Binomial outcomes, including any hospitalization, any ICU admission, and procedures were compared between groups using a Poisson regression model with robust variance estimates [9, 10] to calculate prevalence ratios. We performed all regression analyses both unadjusted and adjusted for covariates, including age, gender, race, region, comorbidities, and prior hospitalization. Additionally, we calculated the cost ratio for diabetes among subgroups of beneficiaries who had and had not been admitted to the ICU.

We assessed the association between baseline characteristics with Medicare expenditures during the last six months of life among beneficiaries with comorbid heart failure and diabetes. Total expenditures were divided into quintiles among the cohort and unadjusted trends were calculated using chi-squared tests. Beneficiaries with diabetes were then divided into two groups based on median total expenditures. We used Poisson regression with robust variance to determine the association between baseline characteristics and presence in the higher expenditure group, after adjustment for covariates.

Statistical significance was pre-specified with an alpha level of 0.05 (two-tailed). Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 10 (Stata Statistical Software: Release 10, StataCorp, College Station, TX, 2007).

Results

Of the 16,613 Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure included in our study, 41.7% (n=6,922) had comorbid diabetes mellitus. Diabetes was associated with younger age, male gender, and black race (Table 1). As compared to beneficiaries without diabetes, individuals with diabetes were more likely to have other comorbid conditions, including COPD, hypertension, kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, and depression. Beneficiaries with diabetes were more frequently hospitalized than beneficiaries without diabetes in the year prior to the last six months of life.

Table 1
Baseline characteristics of 16,613 Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure who died in 2007, by diabetes status.

Total Medicare expenditures during the last six months of life averaged $10,039 higher for beneficiaries with diabetes versus those without diabetes (Table 2). For both groups, the majority of expenditures were related to inpatient costs, with inpatient costs representing a higher percentage of total expenditures among diabetic as compared to non-diabetic individuals (57.7% vs. 54.2%, p<0.001). Diabetes was associated with higher expenditures for inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing, and home health services, but lower expenditures for hospice care. Although the higher expenditures among decedents with diabetes were attenuated in multivariate analysis, diabetes remained independently associated with an 8% increase in total expenditures. (Table 3) Diabetes was associated with similar increases in expenditures among subgroups of beneficiaries who had been admitted to the ICU (cost ratio 1.06; 95% CI 1.03–1.10) and those who had not had been admitted to ICU (cost ratio 1.07; 95% CI 1.02–1.12).

Table 2
Healthcare utilization among Medicare Beneficiaries with heart failure during the last 6 months of life, by diabetes status.
Table 3
Association of diabetes with healthcare utilization among Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure during the last 6 months of life.

Individuals with diabetes experienced a mean of 0.6 more hospitalizations during the last six months of life, with over half of the additional hospitalizations due to non-cardiovascular causes. (Table 2) Diabetes was associated with a 3% increased of ever being hospitalized, a 9% increase in the rate of hospitalization, and a 14% increase in the number of hospitalization days, after adjustment for covariates (Table 3). Beneficiaries with diabetes spent 19% more hospital days in the ICU as compared to beneficiaries without diabetes. Conversely, diabetic individuals were 7% less like to use of hospice services during the last six months of life.

In unadjusted analysis, diabetes was associated with higher utilization of all procedures evaluated, including echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy, dialysis, and noninvasive and mechanical ventilation. However, after multivariate adjustment, only echocardiography and mechanical ventilation were independently associated with comorbid diabetes (Table 3).

Among individuals with comorbid heart failure and diabetes, a number of baseline characteristics were associated with Medicare expenditures. Beneficiaries who were of younger age, male gender, black race, or from Northeast region had lower expenditures in the unadjusted analysis (p-trend=0.03 for gender, p-trend <0.001 for age, race, and region). All comorbid conditions was associated with increased expenditures with the exception of dementia, which was associated with reduced Medicare expenditures (p-trend <0.01). After adjusting for all other covariates, younger age, region, prior hospitalizations, hypertension, ESRD, and absence of dementia remained strong predictors of increased expenditures among individuals with comorbid heart failure and diabetes (Table 4).

Table 4
Association of baseline characteristics with higher than median expenditures during the last 6 months of life, among 6,922 Medicare beneficiaries with comorbid heart failure and diabetes.

Discussion

In our nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure near the end of life, comorbid diabetes was present in 42% of decedents. This prevalence was similar to findings from a number of other contemporary studies of heart failure patients, in which diabetes prevalence has ranged from 20 to 45%. [35, 1113] The presence of diabetes was associated with increased expenditures in Medicare during the last six months of life, primarily related to increases in hospitalizations and inpatient expenditures. We found diabetes to be associated with some, but not all, cardiovascular procedures, while beneficiaries with diabetes had higher rates of intensive care unit stays than beneficiaries without diabetes. Conversely, diabetes was associated with reduced hospice use.

We found that Medicare expenditures for beneficiaries with diabetes were on average $10,000 higher than those for their counterparts without diabetes in the last six months of life. Following adjustment for covariates, diabetes was associated with an 8% increase in total expenditures. This associated increase in expenditures was similar to results from a prior study of heart failure patients at a single hospital center, although the prior findings were aggregated over a two-year period and did not specifically evaluate end-of-life expenditures. [7] Similarly, other studies have found diabetes to be associated with increased expenditures following incident heart failure although have not examined the high cost period near the end of life. [2, 14] In a general Medicare population, diabetes was recently shown to be associated with a 16% increase in expenditures near the end of life. [15] We found diabetes to be associated with increased expenditures among a cohort of individuals with heart failure, a chronic disease known to be associated with high costs, particularly near the end of life. [16, 17]

In our study, diabetes was associated with increased hospitalization rates and days spent in the hospital. Previous studies have shown diabetes in heart failure to be associated with poor outcomes, including increased rates of hospitalizations and increased hospital length of stay. [6, 11] Nonetheless, comorbid diabetes has not consistently predicted hospitalization-related costs in adults with heart failure. [14, 18] We found that diabetes was associated with increased inpatient related expenditures in a cohort of Medicare decedents with heart failure. Furthermore, costs related to hospitalizations appeared to be the primary driver of increased total expenditures observed among beneficiaries with diabetes as compared to those without diabetes.

Our findings suggest that strategies to keep individuals with heart failure and diabetes out of the hospital may be a promising approach to reduce costs. Clinical trials have shown medical interventions including beta-blocker therapy and blockade of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system to be efficacious at reducing hospitalizations among individuals with both heart failure and diabetes. [19, 20] From a health delivery standpoint, close physician follow-up may be associated with lower rates of hospitalization among individuals with heart failure near the end of life. [21] Outpatient disease management programs have been shown to reduce hospitalizations in heart failure. [22] In particular, we found that certain demographic and clinical characteristics were associated with increased expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes and heart failure. These characteristics, which included reduced age, race other than white, increased number of prior hospitalizations, and certain comorbidities, may be useful to help identify which patients may most benefit from intensive multi-disease management.

Our study focused on individuals near the end of life, a population for whom hospice care has been shown to reduce hospitalizations [23] and may reduce total expenditures, [24] although this has not been consistently shown. [25] While Medicare data does not include end of life preferences, more than one-third of beneficiaries in our study had chosen to enroll in hospice care, a notable finding given the older age and high rate of comorbidity of beneficiaries in this study. However, decedents with comorbid diabetes had lower rates of hospice use than their counterparts free of diabetes. Given the high rates of hospitalizations observed among beneficiaries with diabetes and heart failure coupled with the potential economic and non-economic benefits of palliative care, improvement in end of life discussions in this population might help reduce expenditures.

Diabetes was associated with increased prevalence of comorbidities other than dementia. Among beneficiaries with diabetes, most comorbidities were associated with increased costs. Therefore, the association between diabetes and increased utilization may have been partially mediated by other conditions. Nonetheless, after adjustment for these covariates, diabetes was still associated with increased expenditures and hospitalizations.

Our study has several limitations. First, our use of diagnostic coding may have led to errors in misclassification, although we used a validated algorithm to define both heart failure [26] and diabetes. [27] Our reliance on claims data limited our ability to identify certain clinical factors that may have affected outcomes in our study, including markers of disease severity such as functional status, glycosylated hemoglobin, and ejection fraction. As a result of lack of data on ejection fraction, we were unable to characterize beneficiaries as having heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. This distinction may have led to additional confounding. Nonetheless, some studies have found diabetes to be similarly prevalent in heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction, [28, 29] so the difference in heart failure classification between beneficiaries with and without diabetes may have been small. The claims data did not allow us to fully evaluate differences in treatment uptake between beneficiaries with and without diabetes. In particular, we could not determine frequency of enrollment in disease management programs nor adherence to heart failure medications, both of which have been shown to be efficacious in heart failure patients. Claims were also limited to direct Medicare costs and thus our results do not reflect data on both direct and indirect costs to patients and their families. We did not have available patient reported outcomes or patient preferences, which are particularly important in end-of-life care. This study specifically addressed resource utilization near the end of life, a period often characterized by high intensity of care. Our findings of an association between diabetes and utilization may not be generalizable to beneficiaries with heart failure who are not in the last six months of life.

In conclusion, diabetes is common in heart failure near the end of life and associated with increased expenditures, hospitalizations, and other markers of utilization. Comorbid diabetes should be specifically considered in programs aimed at improving care and reducing unnecessary hospitalizations and costs for patients with heart failure.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Blecker was supported by NHLBI grant 5T32HL007024. Dr. Brancati was supported by NIDDK grants K24DK62222 and P60KD079637.

Footnotes

Disclosures

None

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:e46–e215. [PubMed]
2. Dunlay SM, Shah ND, Shi Q, Morlan B, VanHouten H, Long KH, et al. Lifetime costs of medical care after heart failure diagnosis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:68–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Unroe KT, Greiner MA, Hernandez AF, Whellan DJ, Kaul P, Schulman KA, et al. Resource use in the last 6 months of life among medicare beneficiaries with heart failure, 2000–2007. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:196–203. [PubMed]
4. Wong CY, Chaudhry SI, Desai MM, Krumholz HM. Trends in comorbidity, disability, and polypharmacy in heart failure. Am J Med. 2011;124:136–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. From AM, Leibson CL, Bursi F, Redfield MM, Weston SA, Jacobsen SJ, et al. Diabetes in heart failure: prevalence and impact on outcome in the population. Am J Med. 2006;119:591–9. [PubMed]
6. Kamalesh M, Cleophas TJ. Heart failure due to systolic dysfunction and mortality in diabetes: pooled analysis of 39,505 subjects. J Card Fail. 2009;15:305–9. [PubMed]
7. Bogner HR, Miller SD, de Vries HF, Chhatre S, Jayadevappa R. Assessment of cost and health resource utilization for elderly patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus. J Card Fail. 2010;16:454–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Whellan DJ, Greiner MA, Schulman KA, Curtis LH. Costs of inpatient care among Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure, 2001 to 2004. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:33–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:940–3. [PubMed]
10. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702–6. [PubMed]
11. Greenberg BH, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Chiswell K, Clare R, Stough WG, et al. Influence of diabetes on characteristics and outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure: a report from the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF) Am Heart J. 2007;154:277, e1–8. [PubMed]
12. Adams KF, Jr, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo MR, Abraham WT, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) Am Heart J. 2005;149:209–16. [PubMed]
13. Cleland JG, Swedberg K, Follath F, Komajda M, Cohen-Solal A, Aguilar JC, et al. The EuroHeart Failure survey programme-- a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Part 1: patient characteristics and diagnosis. European Heart Journal. 2003;24:442–63. [PubMed]
14. Weintraub WS, Kawabata H, Tran M, L’Italien GJ, Chen RS. Influence of co-morbidity on cost of care for heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:1011–5. A8. [PubMed]
15. Kelley AS, Ettner SL, Morrison RS, Du Q, Wenger NS, Sarkisian CA. Determinants of medical expenditures in the last 6 months of life. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:235–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Liao L, Anstrom KJ, Gottdiener JS, Pappas PA, Whellan DJ, Kitzman DW, et al. Long-term costs and resource use in elderly participants with congestive heart failure in the Cardiovascular Health Study. American Heart Journal. 2007;153:245–52. [PubMed]
17. Russo MJ, Gelijns AC, Stevenson LW, Sampat B, Aaronson KD, Renlund DG, et al. The cost of medical management in advanced heart failure during the final two years of life. J Card Fail. 2008;14:651–8. [PubMed]
18. Titler MG, Jensen GA, Dochterman JM, Xie XJ, Kanak M, Reed D, et al. Cost of hospital care for older adults with heart failure: medical, pharmaceutical, and nursing costs. Health Serv Res. 2008;43:635–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Cohn JN, Tognoni G. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1667–75. [PubMed]
20. Deedwania PC, Giles TD, Klibaner M, Ghali JK, Herlitz J, Hildebrandt P, et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of metoprolol CR/XL in patients with diabetes and chronic heart failure: experiences from MERIT-HF. American Heart Journal. 2005;149:159–67. [PubMed]
21. Kronman AC, Ash AS, Freund KM, Hanchate A, Emanuel EJ. Can primary care visits reduce hospital utilization among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life? J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1330–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Roccaforte R, Demers C, Baldassarre F, Teo KK, Yusuf S. Effectiveness of comprehensive disease management programmes in improving clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. A meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005;7:1133–44. [PubMed]
23. Bergman J, Saigal CS, Lorenz KA, Hanley J, Miller DC, Gore JL, et al. Hospice use and high-intensity care in men dying of prostate cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:204–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Pyenson B, Connor S, Fitch K, Kinzbrunner B. Medicare cost in matched hospice and non-hospice cohorts. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;28:200–10. [PubMed]
25. Campbell DE, Lynn J, Louis TA, Shugarman LR. Medicare program expenditures associated with hospice use. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:269–77. [PubMed]
26. Goff DC, Jr, Pandey DK, Chan FA, Ortiz C, Nichaman MZ. Congestive heart failure in the United States: is there more than meets the I(CD code)? The Corpus Christi Heart Project. Archives of internal medicine. 2000;160:197–202. [PubMed]
27. Birman-Deych E, Waterman AD, Yan Y, Nilasena DS, Radford MJ, Gage BF. Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors. Med Care. 2005;43:480–5. [PubMed]
28. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:251–9. [PubMed]
29. MacDonald MR, Petrie MC, Varyani F, Ostergren J, Michelson EL, Young JB, et al. Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1377–85. [PubMed]